If All You See…

…is an ocean that will soon rise 100 feet, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Israel Matzav.

Read: If All You See… »

Bummer: Polar Bears Doing Just Fine

I’m wondering how Warmists will spin this

(Globe And Mail) Healthy polar bear count confounds doomsayers

The debate about climate change and its impact on polar bears has intensified with the release of a survey that shows the bear population in a key part of northern Canada is far larger than many scientists thought, and might be growing.

The number of bears along the western shore of Hudson Bay, believed to be among the most threatened bear subpopulations, stands at 1,013 and could be even higher, according to the results of an aerial survey released Wednesday by the Government of Nunavut. That’s 66 per cent higher than estimates by other researchers who forecasted the numbers would fall to as low as 610 because of warming temperatures that melt ice faster and ruin bears’ ability to hunt. The Hudson Bay region, which straddles Nunavut and Manitoba, is critical because it’s considered a bellwether for how polar bears are doing elsewhere in the Arctic.

So, polar bears are doing fine? Hmph. That’s probably bad for the seal populations, so the Warmists will probably soon trot out a meme about seals being decimated due to starving polar bears, and bears are starving due to climate change. And there are too many bears because Republicans are against providing no-copay contraceptives to the bears. And Bush is a Republican, so it’s all Bush’s fault.

Read: Bummer: Polar Bears Doing Just Fine »

Obama Looks To Patronize Women With A “Female Forum”

Yesterday, The Washington Post wondered whether there is a war on women, or simply a battle for their votes. Obama and the Democrats can’t run on their records: their Stimulus measures were a disaster, they really do not want to talk about Obama’s signature legislation, Obamacare, and Obama’s foreign policy has been weak and, well, a disaster. The only thing he can point out as a success is killing Osama and other jihadis, which pisses off the liberal base. So, Team Obama and their Democrat sycophants have to create phony issues in an attempt to distract from their pitiful record. He chimed in on Augusta National’s men only policy, and now he’s going to have a female forum

(CBS News) The White House will host a forum on women and the economy, just as the latest political buzz focuses on the growing gender gap in America.

It’s the talk of cable news – whichever Republican candidate President Obama faces starts from behind with one of the most important group of voters: women.

The White House is clearly aware of the president’s gender advantage – but insists that has nothing to do with today’s Forum on Women and the Economy.

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said in recent briefing with the press, “We’re focusing on women because there are a number of issues that important with regards to women in the economy, women’s safety, women in education, that are very distinct and important. And we’re proud to host the conference.”

Sure thing. This is the same guy who played 23 rounds of golf before bothering to invite a woman to join in

“Women are Obama’s base, and they don’t seem to have enough people who look like the base inside of their own inner circle,” former Clinton press secretary Dee Dee Myers told the Times.

In a 2011 article titled “The White House Boys’ Club: President Obama Has a Woman Problem,” TIME magazine’s Amy Sullivan detailed the president’s fondness for male-dominated environments.

The Obama White House has been called “hostile environment to women that treats them like meat. But, no, the forum is simply coincidental. And will stick women in the same old boxes, treating them as a voting block, rather than individuals.

Unfortunately, women still voter more for the Democrats than the GOP: the question for women is “do you want to patronized, or empowered?”

Read: Obama Looks To Patronize Women With A “Female Forum” »

You Refused To Use Just One TP Square, So Anthrax Will Be More Prevalent

It’s all your fault. You flushed your toilet, wasted water while shaving in the shower, and drove a fossil fueled vehicle to work this morning, so, pathogens like anthrax will kill us all

(The Daily Climate) Diarrhea, cholera and tick-borne illness: As the climate changes, a host of health threats are predicted to escalate, experts say.

Everybody panic!!!!!!1!!!!!

Environmental changes already underway are allowing public health experts to establish stronger links between global warming and infectious disease.

An analysis of pathogens in Europe that pose a serious threat to humans or animals, such as anthrax and cholera, found that climate change could influence 60 percent of these diseases. That’s “a remarkably high number,” said Matthew Baylis, an epidemiologist at the University of Liverpool in the UK, who presented his work this week at a symposium on infectious diseases and climate change at the University of Georgia.

He predicts temperatures and rainfall will have an “overwhelming” effect on tick-borne disease. Strong winds could spread anthrax. West Nile virus is susceptible to changes in temperature and rainfall.

I told you that leaving your DVR plugged in while at work was evil, but, did you listen? Nooooooooo! You thought it would be a hoot to record Cheaters while at work. And, because you did that, the climate, which had never changed prior to 1980, will now be hotcoldwetdry and make diseases worse. Just like back in 14th century, when the Black Plague killed an estimated 75 million people as the world entered the Little Ice Age. But, don’t worry, because anthropogenic global warming is making things hotter, so disease will be worse

In developing countries, diarrhea, which is a symptom of gastrointestinal infection, is one of the biggest health concerns. Diarrhea kills 2.5 million children each year, but little data about diarrhea and climate exists. Karen Levy, an environmental epidemiologist at Emory University in Atlanta, found that rotavirus, which causes diarrhea, becomes more active in tropical regions when the climate is cooler and drier. Levy will soon focus on predicting how other triggers of diarrhea – norovirus, a highly contagious bug and the leading cause of food-borne disease outbreaks in the United States, is her group’s next target – will change with the climate.

Wait, wait, it’s worse when cooler and drier? So, what we want is to make the climate hotter and wetter. Interesting.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: You Refused To Use Just One TP Square, So Anthrax Will Be More Prevalent »

Another ObamaFail, This Time Regarding UN Internet Regulation

As usual, Obama has been a bit too preoccupied with stuff, like golf, vacations, campaigning, impugning the Supreme Court, campaigning, to do the job he voluntarily ran for

(Politico) Faced with the prospect of United Nations regulation of the Internet, the United States has yet to appoint a leader for an upcoming battle with other countries over Web management.

Less than a year from a historic treaty negotiation that will redefine international agreements on Internet management, the U.S. has yet to name someone to head up the American delegation. The absence of an American point person in a process that will pit the United States, and other nations, against countries that would like to give the U.N. greater authority has started to worry lawmakers.

“It’s a mistake, and I think it’s a bad mistake,” Rep. Greg Walden, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications and Technology, said in a recent interview. “I’m pretty concerned that they haven’t designated a lead person yet.”

The Oregon Republican and other officials are worried about efforts by Russia, China, India and Brazil, among other countries, to give the U.N. new and unprecedented powers over the Web. The fear is that the treaty might end up giving governments more of a say about Web content and infrastructure.

Perhaps, instead of ObamaFail, we should term this “dereliction of duty”. One has to wonder, since Obama, like most good little lefties, believes that the United Nations is super awesome and can do no wrong and should be in charge, along with Obama’s “world view”, if he has intentionally ignored this issue, in an attempt to give the UN more power over the Internet, and the United States.

Read: Another ObamaFail, This Time Regarding UN Internet Regulation »

If All You See…

…is an appliance that should be unplugged when it is not being used, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Maggie’s Farm.

Read: If All You See… »

Warmists Suggest Peeing In The Shower To Save Gaia

No, the article wasn’t written by Sheryl “One Sheet” Crow, but our favorite Greenie Pig, who also learned not that long ago that living the “carbon neutral” lifestyle was hard work, really sucked, and generally failed. But, she has some other ideas on how to regulate your bathroom functions

(Grist) You guys, I just can’t use a pee rag.

Yes, I love the trees. No, I don’t want to waste paper. Yes, I want to green up my life, bathroom habits included. But the conventional go-wipe-flush routine has served me well since toilet training, and I’ve gotta say, switching to an old strip of cloth in lieu of toilet paper isn’t an easy transition. Today’s hardcore greenies have dreamed up plenty of other TP alternatives, but you know, none of those look so great, either.

I know I’ve pledged to try out green lifestyle practices, but when an editor suggested the ol’ pee rag, I hit a serious brick wall. Still, while researching the many other low-waste bathroom habits I could be adopting instead, it struck me that perhaps these TP tricks fall into a natural progression. One can’t be expected to go from 0 to 60 immediately. Better to identify your comfortable cruising speed first, then gradually amp it up, step by step.

Seriously, a “pee rag”? What the hell is the matter with these people? Oh, right. They’re Warmists. Synonym is “bat shit crazy”.

Anyhow, Greenie Pig has some ideas to help out with your biological functions, which includes buying recycled and rationing TP (all in all, not bad ideas, both from a real environmental standpoint and from a “don’t clog your toilet up” standpoint). Then we get

  • Pee in the shower (Most guys do this now and then, but, we don’t make it a habit)
  • DIY toilet paper (like old phone books and stuff)
  • Eat more fiber – Because it, uh, firms things up, thereby reducing the need to wipe … You know what? Nevermind. (yeah, nevermind)
  • Bidets and wannabe bidets (um, doesn’t that then waste water?)
  • Peeing in a bucket (live like it’s 1499. As someone who’s had to do this while in the hospital for a week at a time with a broken ankle and a broken leg, it’s not particularly fun.)
  • Hand and water (I don’t think you want to read how this works over at the article. But, hey, some people pay….stopping here)
  • Leaves (hey, neighbor, what ya doing? Gathering leaves for toilet paper. Well, yeah, you have fun, and please don’t go out in public)

Don’t forget, these people are the base of the Democrat Party. Anyhow, Warmists, that’s how you save Gaia. So, get cracking!

Read: Warmists Suggest Peeing In The Shower To Save Gaia »

Oops: Dems “War On Women” Meme Not Particularly Successful

Ever since the Democrats trotted student professional activist Sandra Fluke up to a fake Congressional hearing, in which she told us that law students needed to spend a whopping $1,000 a year on birth control, which they couldn’t afford, despite attending a fancy, expensive law school, the Democrats have been attempting to paint a picture of some kind of Republican war on women, especially after the comments Rush Limbaugh made. Then it was shown that liberals tend to make some pretty misogynistic comments, particularly about Conservative women.

And, what did we learn? Well, besides Limbaugh gaining viewers and new stations, well, the Politico grudgingly tells us that the war on women meme is failing, at least in a bluer than blue state

Brown’s continued strength in Massachusetts should alarm Democrats banking on demonizing those on the right as complicit in a “war on women.” Even many voters in the bluest-of-blue state of Massachusetts aren’t buying this line.

Independent Women’s Voice led an independent expenditure ahead of the special election in 2010 to redefine the Brown-Coakley contest as a consequential event deciding the fate of federal legislation on health care and “the critical 41st Senate vote.” And now, in a poll of 505 likely voters in Massachusetts, conducted by the polling company™ and IWV finds Brown now leads 47 percent to 39 percent, while 12 percent of respondents remain undecided. Asked to recall their voting preferences from one month ago, 43 percent said they had supported Brown compared with 34 percent who had supported Warren.

This suggests that Brown’s lead narrowed by a statistically insignificant one point, during a month in which the media-narrative was a moderate Republican’s nightmare. Democrats turned public concern about the Obama administration’s mandate that employers (including those with religious affiliations) must provide health insurance covering abortion-inducing drugs and sterilization into a national discussion of Republican attitudes regarding contraception. GOP missteps — from failing to showcase women at prominent congressional hearings about religious liberty versus the mandate, recast by the left as being about women’s health, to conservative icon Rush Limbaugh, misled by an inaccurate report, insulting a Georgetown law student/contraceptive activist (for which he apologized, but by then the narrative was set) — allowed Democrats to twist opposition to the unprecedented government mandate into a “GOP War on Women.” Elizabeth Warren, the prominent, feminist Harvard professor, seems particularly well positioned to seize this narrative and find a sympathetic audience in the Bay State.

What they determine is that those who bought into the Democrat narrative were those who were predisposed to vote Democrat anyhow, and, as for others

More than half of those who have increased support for Brown in the past month say the health care, birth control mandate debate influenced their vote “a great deal” or “some” compared with only 39 percent of those who recently increased support for Elizabeth Warren.

I’d suggest the increase is because women aren’t stupid. Without attempting to be insulting, women can be very emotional in their beliefs, causing men consternation, because we tend to be practical and try and solve problems when we should be comforting (right now, every man is remembering that time when they got in trouble for this). But, they can also inherently tell when someone is trying to pull the wool over their eyes, when they are completely full of mule fritters. And women prefer to be treated as individuals, not as a group. Democrats expected women as a group to buy into their bat guano narrative regarding the mandate that Catholic religious organizations provide contraception, sterilization, and abortifacients with no copays to those one their insurance plans. They haven’t, because women can smell bullsh*t a mile away, and,also, women do not like to be patronized.

The article does suggest that Republicans need to frame this issue appropriately. Also, that voters want to hear about the real consequences of policy decisions, not overwrought emotional appeals, which, face it, is pretty much all Democrats have left. They sure do not want to talk about the results of their policies.

Read: Oops: Dems “War On Women” Meme Not Particularly Successful »

KSM, 4 Other Jihadis, To Face Military Tribunal For 9/11 Attack

The in-the-bag-media is working hard to forget that this is the final point of a complete capitulation by Obama and Holder, both of whom wanted these al Qaeda members tried in a federal civilian court blocks from Ground Zero, and ran into a massive outcry over that idiotic plan. Perhaps if he had announced a civilian trial in, say, South Dakota, he could have gotten away with it, but, probably not. Obama tried to showboat, and it came back and slapped him around the head with the stupidity bat

(CNN) The United States on Wednesday announced charges against Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, accused of orchestrating the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and four others accused of involvement in the plot.

“If convicted, the five accused could be sentenced to death,” the Defense Department said in a statement.

Along with Mohammed, the others are Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin ‘Attash, Ramzi Binalshibh, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali, and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi.

The charges allege that the five are “responsible for the planning and execution of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, in New York, Washington, D.C., and Shanksville, Pa., resulting in the killing of 2,976 people,” the statement said.

This begs the question, which will be completed first, the trials or the Shanksville Memorial/Freedom Tower? Over ten years later and neither is close to completion. And perhaps some apologies to the Islamists around the world when they start rioting.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

The ACLU has issues with this, and decides to insult the military

The American Civil Liberties Union opposes the military tribunals.

They “are sure to be subject to continuous legal challenges and delays, and their outcomes will not be seen as legitimate. That is not justice,” the group said Wednesday.

ACLU Executive Director Anthony D. Romero said the administration is making a “terrible mistake by prosecuting the most important terrorism trials of our time in a second-tier system of justice.”

Besides insulting the military, they’ve also shown their hand that they will do everything in their power to muck up the trials of these jihadis. Firedoglake, good jihadi sympathizers that they are, double down on insulting the military.

KSM and the others must be arraigned within 30 days, which will occur at Guantanamo Bay detention facility, which is still open, despite closing it being Obama’s first act in office. Expect a speedy trial, ending sometime in October, so Obama can claim victory for their sentencing. We all know he’ll claim credit.

Read: KSM, 4 Other Jihadis, To Face Military Tribunal For 9/11 Attack »

MSM Liberal Suggests Impeaching Justices Who Rule The Mandate Unconstitutional

Sadly, this is not the Onion, this is what passes for serious thought in Liberal World

(Daily Beast) Impeach the Supreme Court Justices If They Overturn Health-Care Law

The Roberts Court’s rulings appear to be a concerted effort to send us back to the Gilded Age. If they dump the Affordable Care Act, writes David Dow, we should dump them.

You think the idea is laughable?

Thomas Jefferson disagreed with you. Jefferson believed Supreme Court justices who undermine the principles of the Constitution ought to be impeached, and that wasn’t just idle talk. During his presidency, Jefferson led the effort to oust Justice Samuel Chase, arguing that Chase was improperly seizing power. The Senate acquitted Chase in 1805, and no Justice has been impeached since, but as the Supreme Court threatens to nullify the health-care law, Jefferson’s idea is worth revisiting.

See, the problem with the Left …… well, one of them…. is that to them, the Constitution should always be made to fit their preconceived notions. They should always triumph. And, if not Bad Things should hapoen to others.

They do not like that the Constitution does guarantee rights and stuff to the citizens from the government. It makes them really angry that that document limits the power of the government, particularly the Central Government, and grants everything to the States and the People.

Protein Wisdom says an all-out coup is being attempted. Instapundit calls this pre-emptive war on SCOTUS. The Jawa Report highlights that you should be scared that the writer is a law professor.

Read: MSM Liberal Suggests Impeaching Justices Who Rule The Mandate Unconstitutional »

Pirate's Cove