…is an ocean that will soon rise 100 feet, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Israel Matzav.
Read: If All You See… »
…is an ocean that will soon rise 100 feet, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Israel Matzav.
Read: If All You See… »
I’m wondering how Warmists will spin this
(Globe And Mail) Healthy polar bear count confounds doomsayers
The debate about climate change and its impact on polar bears has intensified with the release of a survey that shows the bear population in a key part of northern Canada is far larger than many scientists thought, and might be growing.
The number of bears along the western shore of Hudson Bay, believed to be among the most threatened bear subpopulations, stands at 1,013 and could be even higher, according to the results of an aerial survey released Wednesday by the Government of Nunavut. That’s 66 per cent higher than estimates by other researchers who forecasted the numbers would fall to as low as 610 because of warming temperatures that melt ice faster and ruin bears’ ability to hunt. The Hudson Bay region, which straddles Nunavut and Manitoba, is critical because it’s considered a bellwether for how polar bears are doing elsewhere in the Arctic.
So, polar bears are doing fine? Hmph. That’s probably bad for the seal populations, so the Warmists will probably soon trot out a meme about seals being decimated due to starving polar bears, and bears are starving due to climate change. And there are too many bears because Republicans are against providing no-copay contraceptives to the bears. And Bush is a Republican, so it’s all Bush’s fault.
It’s all your fault. You flushed your toilet, wasted water while shaving in the shower, and drove a fossil fueled vehicle to work this morning, so, pathogens like anthrax will kill us all
(The Daily Climate) Diarrhea, cholera and tick-borne illness: As the climate changes, a host of health threats are predicted to escalate, experts say.
Everybody panic!!!!!!1!!!!!
Environmental changes already underway are allowing public health experts to establish stronger links between global warming and infectious disease.
An analysis of pathogens in Europe that pose a serious threat to humans or animals, such as anthrax and cholera, found that climate change could influence 60 percent of these diseases. That’s “a remarkably high number,” said Matthew Baylis, an epidemiologist at the University of Liverpool in the UK, who presented his work this week at a symposium on infectious diseases and climate change at the University of Georgia.
He predicts temperatures and rainfall will have an “overwhelming” effect on tick-borne disease. Strong winds could spread anthrax. West Nile virus is susceptible to changes in temperature and rainfall.
I told you that leaving your DVR plugged in while at work was evil, but, did you listen? Nooooooooo! You thought it would be a hoot to record Cheaters while at work. And, because you did that, the climate, which had never changed prior to 1980, will now be hotcoldwetdry and make diseases worse. Just like back in 14th century, when the Black Plague killed an estimated 75 million people as the world entered the Little Ice Age. But, don’t worry, because anthropogenic global warming is making things hotter, so disease will be worse
In developing countries, diarrhea, which is a symptom of gastrointestinal infection, is one of the biggest health concerns. Diarrhea kills 2.5 million children each year, but little data about diarrhea and climate exists. Karen Levy, an environmental epidemiologist at Emory University in Atlanta, found that rotavirus, which causes diarrhea, becomes more active in tropical regions when the climate is cooler and drier. Levy will soon focus on predicting how other triggers of diarrhea – norovirus, a highly contagious bug and the leading cause of food-borne disease outbreaks in the United States, is her group’s next target – will change with the climate.
Wait, wait, it’s worse when cooler and drier? So, what we want is to make the climate hotter and wetter. Interesting.
Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.
Read: You Refused To Use Just One TP Square, So Anthrax Will Be More Prevalent »
…is an appliance that should be unplugged when it is not being used, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Maggie’s Farm.
Read: If All You See… »
Ever since the Democrats trotted student professional activist Sandra Fluke up to a fake Congressional hearing, in which she told us that law students needed to spend a whopping $1,000 a year on birth control, which they couldn’t afford, despite attending a fancy, expensive law school, the Democrats have been attempting to paint a picture of some kind of Republican war on women, especially after the comments Rush Limbaugh made. Then it was shown that liberals tend to make some pretty misogynistic comments, particularly about Conservative women.
And, what did we learn? Well, besides Limbaugh gaining viewers and new stations, well, the Politico grudgingly tells us that the war on women meme is failing, at least in a bluer than blue state
Brown’s continued strength in Massachusetts should alarm Democrats banking on demonizing those on the right as complicit in a “war on women.†Even many voters in the bluest-of-blue state of Massachusetts aren’t buying this line.
Independent Women’s Voice led an independent expenditure ahead of the special election in 2010 to redefine the Brown-Coakley contest as a consequential event deciding the fate of federal legislation on health care and “the critical 41st Senate vote.†And now, in a poll of 505 likely voters in Massachusetts, conducted by the polling company™ and IWV finds Brown now leads 47 percent to 39 percent, while 12 percent of respondents remain undecided. Asked to recall their voting preferences from one month ago, 43 percent said they had supported Brown compared with 34 percent who had supported Warren.
This suggests that Brown’s lead narrowed by a statistically insignificant one point, during a month in which the media-narrative was a moderate Republican’s nightmare. Democrats turned public concern about the Obama administration’s mandate that employers (including those with religious affiliations) must provide health insurance covering abortion-inducing drugs and sterilization into a national discussion of Republican attitudes regarding contraception. GOP missteps — from failing to showcase women at prominent congressional hearings about religious liberty versus the mandate, recast by the left as being about women’s health, to conservative icon Rush Limbaugh, misled by an inaccurate report, insulting a Georgetown law student/contraceptive activist (for which he apologized, but by then the narrative was set) — allowed Democrats to twist opposition to the unprecedented government mandate into a “GOP War on Women.†Elizabeth Warren, the prominent, feminist Harvard professor, seems particularly well positioned to seize this narrative and find a sympathetic audience in the Bay State.
What they determine is that those who bought into the Democrat narrative were those who were predisposed to vote Democrat anyhow, and, as for others
More than half of those who have increased support for Brown in the past month say the health care, birth control mandate debate influenced their vote “a great deal†or “some†compared with only 39 percent of those who recently increased support for Elizabeth Warren.
I’d suggest the increase is because women aren’t stupid. Without attempting to be insulting, women can be very emotional in their beliefs, causing men consternation, because we tend to be practical and try and solve problems when we should be comforting (right now, every man is remembering that time when they got in trouble for this). But, they can also inherently tell when someone is trying to pull the wool over their eyes, when they are completely full of mule fritters. And women prefer to be treated as individuals, not as a group. Democrats expected women as a group to buy into their bat guano narrative regarding the mandate that Catholic religious organizations provide contraception, sterilization, and abortifacients with no copays to those one their insurance plans. They haven’t, because women can smell bullsh*t a mile away, and,also, women do not like to be patronized.
The article does suggest that Republicans need to frame this issue appropriately. Also, that voters want to hear about the real consequences of policy decisions, not overwrought emotional appeals, which, face it, is pretty much all Democrats have left. They sure do not want to talk about the results of their policies.
Read: Oops: Dems “War On Women” Meme Not Particularly Successful »
Sadly, this is not the Onion, this is what passes for serious thought in Liberal World
(Daily Beast) Impeach the Supreme Court Justices If They Overturn Health-Care Law
The Roberts Court’s rulings appear to be a concerted effort to send us back to the Gilded Age. If they dump the Affordable Care Act, writes David Dow, we should dump them.
You think the idea is laughable?
Thomas Jefferson disagreed with you. Jefferson believed Supreme Court justices who undermine the principles of the Constitution ought to be impeached, and that wasn’t just idle talk. During his presidency, Jefferson led the effort to oust Justice Samuel Chase, arguing that Chase was improperly seizing power. The Senate acquitted Chase in 1805, and no Justice has been impeached since, but as the Supreme Court threatens to nullify the health-care law, Jefferson’s idea is worth revisiting.
See, the problem with the Left …… well, one of them…. is that to them, the Constitution should always be made to fit their preconceived notions. They should always triumph. And, if not Bad Things should hapoen to others.
They do not like that the Constitution does guarantee rights and stuff to the citizens from the government. It makes them really angry that that document limits the power of the government, particularly the Central Government, and grants everything to the States and the People.
Protein Wisdom says an all-out coup is being attempted. Instapundit calls this pre-emptive war on SCOTUS. The Jawa Report highlights that you should be scared that the writer is a law professor.
Read: MSM Liberal Suggests Impeaching Justices Who Rule The Mandate Unconstitutional »