Surprise: Charlotte’s First EV Fire Truck Not Working After One Month

If only someone had warned that doing this stuff was a Bad Idea

Charlotte’s first electric fire truck is out of commission after a month

A little more than a month after the Charlotte Fire Department held a ceremony celebrating the city’s first all-electric fire station and fire truck, the city’s electric fire truck is in the shop.

A spokesperson for Charlotte Fire confirmed to Channel 9 that the city’s electric fire engine is currently out of service while warrant-related items are being addressed. (they proofread as well in the story as I often do in my headlines)

“As with any newly delivered, highly specialized apparatus incorporating emerging technology, minor adjustments and corrections are handled in coordination with the manufacturer under warranty,” a Charlotte Fire spokesperson said.

A spokesperson for Charlotte Fire says response coverage has not been impacted. A reserve engine is in service to ensure an uninterrupted response.

In 2022, the Charlotte City Council spent $1.9 million to purchase the electric fire truck.

A new fossil fueled fire truck typically goes for $750K to $2 million, with that upper range being the big hook and ladder types. The one Charlotte purchased is your standard sized truck. So, about double the cost. If I’m spending $1.9 million I’m kinda expecting it to, you know, work from the get go. Not need “minor adjustments and corrections” after a month. This is not a base model, assembly line built sedan. It’s not a $700 guitar which I will take over to Harry’s to get it set up (not always necessary out of the box). If I buy a $1400 Warren Demartini blood and skull, I’m not going to be upset if I need to get it set up a little bit. Floyd Rose, string height without buzz. If I have to polish the frets it’s going back. If it’s the $3,700 version, it better be f’ing perfect.

Funny, though, that the EV truck is down right after that big snow and freeze in the Charlotte area. Let’s not forget this piece from January 2024

There is a two word phrase to accurately describe the electric buses sold to transit agencies, and the first of those two words is “cluster”.

e Biden Administration and the global warming climate change activists want to force all new vehicles sold in the United States to be zero-emission come 2035, because they believe that our personal choices don’t matter, but even now they are pushing plug-in electrics, seemingly unconcerned with the possible drawbacks. From Fox Business:

Electric buses are sitting unused in cities across the US; here’s why

(snip)

I did snag an image from the article, which amusingly tells us that the zero emissions are “Clearly Better,” which I suppose is true . . . because buses sitting parked truly are zero emission!

True, true, are zero emissions. There’s more to that article. And here’s from a couple days ago

The story practically wrote itself: a northern state buys electric buses, winter arrives, and the fleet ends up parked behind the depot. The Daily Mail framed Vermont’s experience as an ideological failure – “a liberal stronghold wasting $8 million on buses that freeze in the cold.” It’s a sharp headline, but it obscures more than it reveals.

The underlying facts are real enough. Green Mountain Transit sidelined five electric buses after a manufacturer-identified battery-welding defect raised fire-safety concerns. Cold weather didn’t help; range loss in sub-freezing temperatures is well-documented across the industry. But the narrative that Vermont’s buses “froze” because of political naïveté misses the technical and operational context that actually matters.

Electric buses in cold climates face three predictable stresses: battery heating loads, hilly terrain, and charging logistics. These aren’t ideological problems—they’re engineering challenges. Transit agencies in Minnesota, Québec, and Alberta have been wrestling with the same physics, often successfully, by pairing larger battery packs with depot pre-heating, on-route chargers, and route redesigns. Vermont’s buses weren’t undone by winter so much as by a manufacturer recall layered on top of an early-stage pilot program.

They paid $8 million for the 5 buses and infrastructure. For over a million a pop they should damned will work like the aforementioned Blood and Skull guitar. Like a $4000 Les Paul Supreme (love the wine color, almost a Blood Moon, hate gold pickups, stopbar, etc), $1800 for a Fender American Professional II (that’s about the price point for a “don’t need to do a thing” Fender). Really, buying these buses and fire trucks is like going to the Fender or Gibson custom shops, getting a custom made Jackson or Charvel, a super top end ESP. You do not expect any issues. Not for that money. Of course, the guitar stores and makers are not forcing people into the expensive ones. I can get a nice Epiphone Prophecy or Jackson Adrian Smith in green (seriously considering that one along with a demo Charvel Sunburst) for a good price.

Read: Surprise: Charlotte’s First EV Fire Truck Not Working After One Month »

If All You See…

…is an area flooded by too much carbon pollution Bad Weather, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is No Tricks Zone, with a post on the greening of the Sahara.

Read: If All You See… »

Ul Duce Starmer Thinks Ukraine Is Most Important Issue Of Our Age

I thought he said ‘climate change’ was the most important issue? Or, was that importing Islamists and 3rd worlders to change the UK into a completely different nation? Or, was it destroying free speech for British citizens, taking their flags away, arresting them for silently protesting abortion, sending Mean Tweets?

UK’s Starmer: Ukraine war the most critical issue of our age

Keir Starmer has offered fresh support for Kyiv on the fourth anniversary of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Britain announced Tuesday it will provide £20 million for emergency repairs to energy supplies damaged by Russian attacks over the winter, as well as help to resist so-called “Russification” tactics, and helicopter training for Ukrainian pilots in the U.K.

The announcement comes ahead of a a virtual “coalition of the willing” meeting of Ukraine’s allies Tuesday — the first since Britain and France signed a declaration to send troops to Ukraine if a peace deal is agreed.

Starmer will co-chair the meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron to discuss plans in the event of a ceasefire.

“This war remains the most critical issue of our age. It asks the question of whether Ukrainian and European freedom will endure. Our answer, together, is unequivocal. Russia is not winning this war. They will not win this war,” Starmer said in a statement announcing the extra support.

So important that they’re sending $27 million? That’s it? It’s the whole part about talking about freedom that is funny. Of course, their version of freedom is different then ours. They just mean Europe isn’t under the foot of authoritarian Russia, not the foot of authoritarian EU politicians.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy told the BBC in an interview to mark the anniversary he believes Russian President Vladimir Putin has already started a third world war. “The question is how much territory he will be able to seize and how to stop him,” he said.

Well, so far, Russia isn’t trying to invade any other nations: they’re having enough trouble with Ukraine. But, if Ukraine is the most critical issue, then why are there so few articles about it? Most are far down the page, certainly not front page news. The war just keeps grinding on 4 years in. No real movement. Most want Russia out. How’s that going to happen? It really made no difference when Europe and the Biden admin were feeding massive amounts of weapons and money to Ukraine.

Quite frankly, there’s been less chance of WWIII since Trump took office.

If EU leaders want freedom, when does Ukraine have elections?

Zelenskyy denies plan to announce elections in Ukraine soon despite pressure from Trump

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy does not plan to make an announcement about looming presidential elections in an upcoming speech commemorating the four-year mark of the war, the Ukrainian leader said late Wednesday, after a report suggested he would schedule a national vote due to pressure from President Trump.

Zelenskyy told reporters that Ukraine would “move toward elections when all the relevant security guarantees are in place.”

He’s cancelled them all during war. Maybe these people can vote?

Read: Ul Duce Starmer Thinks Ukraine Is Most Important Issue Of Our Age »

The Massive Northeastern Snowstorm? Your Fault

You knew this had to be coming, right?

The Science Behind NYC’s Severe Snow Storm: Arctic Air, Atlantic Winds and a Historic Nor’easter

NYC Snow Storm: The snowstorm that recently struck New York City was far from an ordinary winter event, as it was driven by an unusual and powerful combination of atmospheric conditions. Millions of city residents in the New York area and the Northeast are under mandatory road travel restrictions as a strong blizzard moves through the area.

In the New York City area, a travel ban has been issued for all non-emergency travel until noon Monday, while similar bans have been issued in Rhode Island and New Jersey. Emergency alerts were issued to cell phones warning of dangerous blizzard conditions, while Mayor Zohran Mamdani has declared Monday a serious snow day, canceling all public school classes. (snipping all the way to the end)

Although experts warn that individual storms cannot be specifically attributed to climate change, scientists have observed that warmer ocean temperatures can lead to more intense storms as a result of increased moisture. When this increased moisture interacts with cold air, snowfall can become heavier and more hazardous. This particular storm demonstrated how warmer Atlantic waters and intense Arctic air outbreaks can combine to create more extreme winter weather events.

New York City’s intense snowstorm was the result of a unique combination of weather factors, including heavy Arctic cold, strong Atlantic winds, and a slow-moving nor’easter that fed on ocean moisture. Taken together, these factors made it one of the most serious winter storms to hit New York City in years.

Sigh. They really can’t help themselves. Was the Great Blizzard Of 1888 caused by ‘climate change’? The photo above is from then. More here.

Brian Krassenstein tried one, but, I guess he was getting to abused to keep it up. Not just because of the ‘climate change’ crap, but, saying that it was 65 mph winds prior to the 11am time frame he posted at for Plymouth, Mass was utterly wrong. Winds were hitting around 55 mph gusts around 1-4. This is what he posted

It’s impressive, but, no weather station recorded anything close to that at 6am.  Anyhow

Read: The Massive Northeastern Snowstorm? Your Fault »

NY Times Seems Upset That Restaurants Having Trouble Due To Immigration

A couple days ago the Raleigh N&O whined about local Raleigh area eateries having issues. Now we have the NY Times

Worse Than the Pandemic’: Restaurants Say ICE Presence Imperils Business
In several cities where immigrants are being detained, owners say they’re struggling to stay open as fear keeps customers and workers from leaving home.

Even as the Covid pandemic shut down every dining room across the country in April 2020, Americans were still ordering takeout, and millions of restaurant employees were getting paychecks funded by government assistance.

Now, as that same government is rounding up immigrants it believes to be in the country illegally — about 70,000 are currently in detention — Cecelia Lizotte, the owner of two Nigerian restaurants called Suya Joint, in Boston and Providence, R.I., says many of her customers are afraid to come in. She can’t even get people in her neighborhood to pick up free meals.

Several of her employees are nervous about coming to work, though Ms. Lizotte says they are in the country lawfully. Her brother, Paul Dama, a Nigerian immigrant who is the restaurant’s manager and was in the process of applying for asylum, was detained on the way to church by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in June and held for three months at a detention center in New Hampshire.

See, that link the Times offers fails to mention relevant information

Asked about the case, ICE spokesman James Covington said in a statement, “Paul Naanman Dama is an illegally present, 46-year-old Nigerian alien who has been unlawfully residing in the United States since August 2019, when he violated the terms of his lawful admission. Dama has two prior convictions for operating a motor vehicle under the influence of liquor. ICE Boston arrested Dama in Brockton, Massachusetts June 15 and placed him into removal proceedings.”

We do have laws. If he had gone through the normal system of becoming a US citizen those convictions would have disqualified him.

In interviews over the past few weeks, restaurant owners in several cities where ICE agents are out on the streets echoed that sentiment: Their businesses are not only teetering on insolvency, they said, but feel even more vulnerable than during the pandemic.

You know, forget the rest of the pro-illegal alien article, let’s cut to the chase: if your business model relies upon hiring illegal aliens and serving illegal aliens, well, any problems are ones you created. They’re lucky the feds aren’t charging the owners with violating federal law in hiring the illegals. It is a federal crime.

Read: NY Times Seems Upset That Restaurants Having Trouble Due To Immigration »

SCOTUS To Hear Lawsuit From Fossil Fuels Companies Against PRCII

That would be the People’s Republik of Colorado, not People’s Republik Of California. You know, the state that relies heavily on fossil fuels to clear all the snow, to bring all those tourists to ski. The airport in Denver is the largest in the US (by land). 2nd largest in the world. 3rd busiest in the US. And 9th busiest in the world.

Supreme Court takes up oil companies’ plea to end climate change lawsuits

The Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear an attempt by energy companies to throw out a lawsuit filed in Colorado seeking to hold them accountable for the costs of climate change.

The court’s ultimate ruling in the case will have national implications, likely determining whether similar lawsuits filed by cities and municipalities across the country seeking billions of dollars in damages can move forward.

Exxon Mobil and Suncor Energy are appealing a May 2025 Colorado Supreme Court ruling that said the lawsuit brought by the city of Boulder and Boulder County could move forward in state court.

The lawsuit claims that the companies, via their marketing, production and sale of fossil fuels, bear responsibility for the harms caused by climate change, including extreme temperatures and more frequent wildfires. The plaintiffs allege violations of various state laws, including consumer protection provisions.

The companies argue that climate policy is a purely federal issue, in part because pollution crosses state lines and cannot be addressed on a piecemeal basis. Air pollution is regulated via the federal Clean Air Act, but more comprehensive efforts to combat climate change at the national level have stalled, with President Donald Trump’s administration particularly opposed to addressing the issue.

And I still maintain that the companies being sued by Colorado, and specifically Exxon Mobil and Suncor since they are countersuiting, should stop selling their products to Boulder and Boulder County. Why would you provide your goods/services to an entity that is suing you? The suit may involved the city and county, but, the State is backing the suit against the fossil fuels companies so it should be involved in full. Boulder has a municipal airport. Lots of people fly in or drive in to go skiing at Eldora Mountain Resort. And they’re all wearing clothes made from petroleum. Plus bags, ski goggles, and skis and boards made with petroleum.

Now we have to wonder how the suit will be ruled.

Read: SCOTUS To Hear Lawsuit From Fossil Fuels Companies Against PRCII »

If All You See…

…is horrible carbon pollution infused beer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Cold Fury, with a post on liberalism/Leftism in a nutshell.

Read: If All You See… »

Democrat Candidates Debate Immigration In NC, Answers Are Unsurprising

They really just do not get what a majority of Americans want. Nor do they care. They’re just playing to their unhinged base, even though the 11th district is the far western tip of NC

5 Democratic candidates for NC’s 11th District debate border security, immigration

On Tuesday, March 3, voters from both parties will head to the polls to choose their party’s nominees in several key races across North Carolina.

One of the most closely watched races is for North Carolina’s 11th Congressional District, which represents much of western North Carolina.

To help voters better understand where the Democratic candidates stand, each was asked the same five questions on issues important to western North Carolinians. This week’s coverage highlights one question per day.

The first topic: Border Security and Immigration

Jamie Ager focused on constitutional concerns in his response. He said the country needs clarity in its border policies and criticized what he described as troubling behavior by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the current administration.

Ager emphasized the importance of due process and the rule of law. He said immigration enforcement officers should be clearly identified and operate within constitutional boundaries.

Same old same old. Funny how Democrats weren’t complaining when Obama was simply catching and deporting, eh?

Lee Whipple emphasized the need for congressional action, stating that immigration reform must come through legislation. He voiced full support for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program and for legal pathways that allow people to come to the United States to work.

Whipple also said he supports creating pathways to citizenship, but stressed that Congress must take responsibility for passing clear and effective immigration policy.

Obviously, congressional action wasn’t necessary to shut the border. And, amnesty! Shocker

Paul Maddox said he supports what he calls a “controlled border,” but not a closed one. He argued that immigrants play a vital role in the country’s future and economic growth.

Maddox pointed out that most Americans are descendants of immigrants and suggested it is hypocritical to deny opportunities to others seeking to come to the United States today.

So, shut the border like Biden? Those immigrants came in mostly through legal means.

Richard Hudspeth strongly criticized current immigration enforcement tactics, calling what he sees happening in the country “abhorrent.” He expressed concern about what he described as government-sponsored military-style actions in cities, arguing that such approaches conflict with the nation’s founding principles.

Hudspeth said he believes borders should not be open or closed, but rather, controlled. He supports what he calls a more “humane, charitable, valuable” immigration program. He argued that the issue is not being effectively addressed by the current administration or by the district’s current representative in Congress.

Yes, it’s abhorrent to detain illegals for deportation per federal law, right? Not really sure what he means by human etc. In my mind that is more work permits, that are monitored heavily. Where employers pay for health insurance and such for the migrant workers

Zelda Briarwood said she supports comprehensive border control and believes serious dialogue is needed around immigration policy. However, she emphasized that she views current enforcement practices as inhumane.

Briarwood argued that immigration enforcement should focus on removing violent criminals rather than targeting broader groups of people. She expressed concern that enforcement agencies are being used in ways that create fear among communities.

We have comprehensive border control. The Trump admin did this with the existing laws on the books. As for criminals, if sanctuary jurisdictions would give them up there would be less chance of the less criminal illegal getting caught up in sweeps. They’re still going to get caught here and there, because they are in the country illegally.

As for fear, well, yeah. It’s worked. The fear is that they will get caught, detained, and deported. It works.

No one is surprised that not one of the Democrats said “they’re here illegally. We need to stop this”, right?

Read: Democrat Candidates Debate Immigration In NC, Answers Are Unsurprising »

Surprise: Climate Scientists Playing With Labeling El Ninos

This is normal: if things do not cooperate change it

Scientists change how El Nino is labeled to keep up with spike in temperature

The natural El Nino cycle, which warps weather worldwide, is both adding to and shaped by a warming world, meteorologists said.

A new study calculated that an unusual recent twist in the warming and cooling cycle that includes El Nino and its counterpart La Nina can help explain the scientific mystery of why Earth’s already rising temperature spiked to a new level over the past three years.

Separately, scientists have had to update how they label El Nino and La Nina because of rapid weather changes cause by global warming. Increasingly hot waters globally have caused the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration this month to alter how it calculates when the weather pattern has flipped into a new cycle. It’s likely to mean that more events will be considered La Nina and fewer qualify as an El Nino for warming tropical waters. (snip)

In a new study in Nature Geoscience this month, Japanese researchers look at how the difference in energy coming to and leaving the planet — called Earth’s energy imbalance — increased in 2022. An increased imbalance, or more trapped heat, then leads to warmer temperatures, scientists said. The researchers calculate that about three-quarters of the change in Earth’s energy imbalance can be attributed to the combination of long-term human-caused climate change and a shift from a three-year cooling La Nina cycle to a warm El Nino one.

Yeah yeah yeah. Cult cult cult. In a couple years they’ll change the definition again.

Read: Surprise: Climate Scientists Playing With Labeling El Ninos »

DHS Reinstates TSA PreCheck, Tells Congress They Will Be Treated By The Masses

This should be the rule, not the exception

Yes, that is a real tweet from TSA. If members of Congress want to fly they can do it just like the rest of us if going through the TSA checkpoint. Heck, if they voted for Biden’s Green New Deal they should be denied entry and given directions to the train station.

DHS reverses course on suspending TSA PreCheck after outcry

The Department of Homeland Security reversed course Sunday morning after saying that it would suspend TSA PreCheck because of the partial government shutdown.

“TSA PreCheck remains operational with no change for the traveling public,” the Transportation Security Administration said in a statement. “As staffing constraints arise, TSA will evaluate on a case by case basis and adjust operations accordingly.”

A DHS official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal processes, said the change was “based off of conversations the secretary had with the White House and TSA.”

The Global Entry program, however, will remain paused, according to the official.

There are reportedly 20 million enrolled in PreCheck, so, I guess it’s good to keep it. Though, it really only saves about 10 minutes. And, really, most do not ask you to take your shoes off, nor take laptops out of bags anymore. Is keeping your belt and light jacket on worth it? If I flew a lot I’d rather have CLEAR, so you can skip right to the security check, skipping the lines.

What Democrats need to do is fund DHS. Stop playing games in trying to protect illegal alien criminals. ICE is already funded. Morons.

Read: DHS Reinstates TSA PreCheck, Tells Congress They Will Be Treated By The Masses »

Pirate's Cove