Swedish Yutes Sue Government Over Climate Crisis (scam)

Will this be the time when the kiddies are asked in court if they have made their own lives carbon neutral?

Swedish Youth Sue Government Over Climate Inaction

A group of young activists has launched a high-stakes legal challenge against the Swedish government, alleging that the nation’s current climate targets are not only inadequate but a violation of international law.

The lawsuit, filed Friday by youth-led organization Aurora, builds on the argument that Switzerland is not doing its “fair share” to limit global warming to 1.5C. The fair share principle establishes that wealthy, historically high-emitting nations must decarbonize faster than the global average to ensure a just transition.

At the heart of the case is the disparity between Sweden’s domestic goals and what climate science deems necessary. While Sweden has pledged to reach net-zero emissions by 2045, Aurora argues this timeline is at least 15 years too late.

The lawsuit also argues that current national plans exclude high-polluting sectors, meaning the government is only accounting for less than half of the emissions under its actual control.

“Those who pollute the most have a duty to pull their weight in the global effort to fight climate change,” said Ida Edling, Aurora’s spokesperson. “We still have a chance to get out of planetary crises and build a safe and just world, but only if rich and high-emitting states like Sweden stop breaking the law and start immediately transforming their societies. We cannot let the state burn our chance.”

In other words, they want Other People to be forced to Do Something, just not themselves. What they fail to realized, because they are young, brainwashed cultists, is that this will create problems, such as price hikes, in their own lives.

The activists maintain that their chances of victory are higher than ever, given the newfound clarity from international courts on how climate litigation should be structured. However, they emphasize that a legal win is only the beginning.

“What is required is … greater systemic change than ever before,” the group said in a press release.

What’s weird is they never really want to say what that change is. I wonder why.

Read: Swedish Yutes Sue Government Over Climate Crisis (scam) »

If All You See…

…is a seashore that will soon be swamped by sea rise, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Geller Report, with a post on France moving into 3rd World territory.

Read: If All You See… »

Fish Wrap: Neighbors Running Illegal Auto Shop, Worried About Turning Them In

Why wouldn’t they turn them in? This is a letter to the Ethicist, a part of the NY Times I had no idea existed, and something no Fish Wrap writer should be allowed to be involved in

My Neighbors Are Running an Auto Shop in Their Driveway. What Should I Do?

double standardsAbout a year ago, a very nice family moved into the rental home next door. We have shared food and invited them to our pool in the summer, and we always exchange greetings from yard to yard.

About six months ago, the father’s auto-shop location apparently became unavailable. He and his mechanics now work on cars in their yard and driveway. At times, 15 cars line their driveway and fill the front yard, in obvious states of repair — hoods up, engines removed. This “shade tree” business practice is illegal in our city, and the number of cars and the manner in which they are parked violates city codes. We and our neighbors worry it’s driving down the property value of adjacent homes, and we plan to sell within a few years.

I’m uncomfortable raising this with the family because I doubt they can do much without losing income. Moving to a new garage would obviously be costly. And if I talk to them and the outcome is unsatisfactory, I’d be the obvious culprit for any report to the city. Our friendly terms would disappear.

I’m also reluctant to report because the family is from Venezuela. (They mentioned having green cards, though I never asked.) I’m afraid that even a code violation could draw attention from ICE, which has an aggressive, unpleasant presence in my city. Thoughts?

My first thought is that law enforcement or some city worker should have noticed this by now and done something. It’s pretty much illegal to be running an auto shop out of your home, particularly if it is a rental. But, the city might ignore a non-citizen doing this because it might attract the attention of federal authorities. They’d be on your ass if you were an American, you can bet that. Second, this is going to decrease the property values and could attract an unsavory crowd to the neighborhood. If these weren’t, most likely, refugees but US citizens it would have been reported, but, libtards are wackadoodle when it comes to non-citizens.

The “Ethicist” reply

You say that you don’t want to raise the issue with this family and harsh the neighborly vibe you enjoy. But what would really be unneighborly is failing to alert them. As things stand, anyone on your block could blow the whistle — either to the city (as a code violation) or to the landlord/property manager (as a lease violation). Looking out for the family means telling them that what they’re doing could invite scrutiny, so that they have a chance to head this off.

The “Ethicist” is recommending that the letter writer find a way around the law. Nice.

Read: Fish Wrap: Neighbors Running Illegal Auto Shop, Worried About Turning Them In »

Bummer: Washington Post Gutted Its Climate (scam) Division

Man, what a shame

From that Climate Colored Goggles link in the first tweet

The Washington Post produced some of America’s finest climate journalism over the last decade, aggressively covering President Trump’s regulatory rollbacks and winning a Pulitzer Prize for a series about Earth’s fastest-warming places. Alongside the New York Times and the Associated Press, I don’t think any U.S. news outlet published a greater volume of urgent, high-quality climate and clean energy coverage.

Everything changed on Wednesday morning.

The Post sent layoff notices to at least 14 climate journalists, newsroom sources told me, part of a massive round of cost-cutting that will see more than 300 journalists lose their jobs — about 30% of all employees at the Jeff Bezos-owned company.

The climate team layoffs include eight writer/reporters, an editor and several video, data and graphics journalists, I’m told. I’m not publishing their names, since many of them haven’t discussed their situations publicly. But to see the invaluable work they and their colleagues have been doing, check out the Post’s climate page here.

But, what are they really producing? How many articles? Anything of consequence? I rarely use the WP for my climate posts, and I rarely see any other Skeptics using their articles. Sounds like they are cutting a lot of bloat and dead weight. The WP is a business meant to make money, but are losing a ton because the product is bad.

Read: Bummer: Washington Post Gutted Its Climate (scam) Division »

LOL: Boston Mayor Thinks She Can Shield Boston From ICE With An EO

Oh, honey child, bless your heart

Mayor Wu aims to shield Boston from federal immigration tactics through executive order

In the aftermath of heavy federal immigration enforcement nationwide, Mayor Michelle Wu signed an executive order Thursday to protect against unconstitutional and violent federal enforcement.

The order asserts that local police are obligated to protect residents, and says the city refuses to assist federal commandeering of local resources.

“We will not allow the birthplace of American democracy to be knocked off our path by those who have turned their backs on our founding principles,” Mayor Wu said during a press conference on Thursday at City Hall.

“An Executive Order To Protect Bostonians From Unconstitutional and Violent Federal Operations” also bans federal officials from using property owned by the city — including buildings, parks and parking lots — for their operations without a valid court order. Earlier Thursday, Worcester announced a similar order.

Is she trying to get a big operation to come to Boston? Because this is how you do it, by daring Trump and Homan. But, I wonder if they might hold off till it’s warmer out, after dealing with Minnesota in the winter.

Wu said the announcement today was in the “spirit of every Bostonian who refused to back down.”

“From the parents who led the school desegregation movement, to the immigrant activists who work every day to make Boston a home for everyone. We are standing tall, and we are standing together,” she said.

Refuse to back down from protesting enforcing federal law? Did this dipshit just compare illegal immigration to desegregation? I wouldn’t be surprised if Blacks came after her hard for that stupidity.

Carol Rose, executive director of the ACLU of Massachusetts, said it was heartening to see the collective solidarity of elected officials and leaders throughout the state on this order, demonstrating a “shared resolve to hold ICE to account.”

“We urge municipalities across Massachusetts to move quickly to implement protections like Boston’s, sending a unified message that ICE cannot act with impunity in this Commonwealth,” Rose said in a written statement. “We also call on state lawmakers to build upon the important immigration bills filed by Gov. Healey and the Black and Latino Legislative Caucus to enact strong, comprehensive law to keep all Massachusetts communities safe and free.”

Shouldn’t the ACLU be standing for Americans? ICE is doing the job as directed by laws passed by the duly elected legislative branch. Good luck with this. What Trump should do is announce that he won’t arrest illegals in Boston, at least for the time being, so that they stream into Beantown. Let Wu deal with the fallout. You know the Trump admin won’t be sending any federal money to help.

Read: LOL: Boston Mayor Thinks She Can Shield Boston From ICE With An EO »

The Yutes Are Feeling Hopeless About Climate Doom

Do you think the CBC will come to the best solution? The reality solution? Or, something else?

Many kids feel hopeless about climate change. Here’s what helps

Despite being concerned about the high use of fossil fuels and non-renewable resources, 14-year-old Midu Nguyen remains hopeful that the world will take action on climate change.

To her, it’s all about perspective. She takes the same approach to it as she does to tests at school.

“If you have a test and you don’t want to study for it because you think you’re already going to fail it, then you will fail,” she said in an interview with CBC News.

“If you change that mindset and think, I will be able to change this, then I think you can really do that.”

But Nguyen is not a typical kid.

2023 study published in The Journal of Climate Change and Health found that at least 56 per cent of Canadian youth respondents feel afraid, sad, anxious and powerless when it comes to climate change. And 78 per cent reported that climate change impacts their overall mental health.

Those numbers are pretty concerning, are they not? They are a direct result of the news, scientists, politicians, teachers, etc, scaring the ever-lovin’ crap out of the kiddies, telling them the world is going to end because of a slight increase in the global temperature over 170 years, but, SOON! doom is coming. Is it any wonder they have these negative feeling? If a child is constantly ridiculed by their parents, made to feel afraid, anxious, worthless, etc, how are they going to grow up? Will they have mental health issues?

Maybe it’s high time to stop the scaremongering, to stop destroying the kiddies mental health

One way to shift that mindset is to talk about it.

Catherine Malboeuf-Hurtubise, a professor at Université Laval and a Canada research chair in art-based and existential interventions in youth mental health, says kids need to be included in conversations about climate, as they will be the ones suffering the most consequences of climate change.

“I think we underestimate their ability to understand, feel and make sense of what’s happening,” she said.

All that does is perpetuate their mental issues. Assholes. The adults who do this should all be taken to remote islands and dropped off with no way off for their child abuse.

Read: The Yutes Are Feeling Hopeless About Climate Doom »

If All You See…

…is a wonderful low carbon bike which Everyone Else should be forced to ride, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Doug Ross @ Journal, with a post on the Discombobulator.

Read: If All You See… »

NY Times: All Those Illegal Alien Cases In Minnesota Are Pushing The System To The Brink

I wasn’t intending to do another immigration piece today, but, this is the web headline story from the Fish Wrap, and I wonder if they could possibly come to the smart conclusion as to how this could have been avoided

Surge in Immigration Cases in Minnesota Pushes Prosecutors and Judges to Brink

When it all became too much — the crippling case load, the lack of training and, most of all, the immigrants themselves who had been languishing in jail — Julie T. Le let loose in front of the judge.

Ms. Le, a prosecutor for the U.S. attorney’s office in Minnesota, knew that he was angry. She understood that she and her colleagues had violated his orders to release people illegally detained in the state last month. But she had already tried to quit her job, and no one would replace her, so what else could she do?

“The system sucks. This job sucks,” Ms. Le exclaimed. While she wanted to improve things, she was just one person, she explained, working around the clock to grapple with the onslaught of cases stemming from the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown.

“Fixing a system, a broken system, I don’t have a magic button to do it,” she said. “I don’t have the power or the voice to do it. I only can do it within the ability and the capacity that I have.”

The remarks cost her her job at the Justice Department, where she had been working on a temporary basis to help handle habeas corpus petitions, or court filings that compel the government to justify holding someone in custody. But they also opened a window onto a broader problem: how the courts in Minnesota are buckling beneath the weight of a deluge of cases arising from the statewide campaign that the administration has called Operation Metro Surge.

OK, I’ll skip posting lots of excerpts and get to the heart of the Times’ story, which is that Trump is a big meanie for detaining people illegally present in the US and pushing them through court, which Obama mostly didn’t, he just deported them toot sweet, and it’s making judges and prosecutors nuts. Oh, and that illegals are great.

But, you know how this could have been avoided? Giving the illegals who get arrested by local, county, and state police over to ICE. Honoring detainers. Letting ICE pick up illegals when they come on their radar at all times. Like during the Obama administration! Deporting them without this whole long rigamarole of courts and hearings and stuff, because the law says they need to be deported. Period.

Meanwhile, more stupidity from the Times, right below the above story

The Long Goodbye:A California Couple Self-Deports to Mexico

Enrique Castillejos and his wife stopped at a Winchell’s Donut House. It was part of their after-church routine on Friday nights.

That evening’s sermon had been about finding peace in God in turbulent times, and they felt it spoke directly to them. Enrique, 63, and his wife, Maria Elena Hernandez, 55, were undocumented immigrants. Like millions of others in Southern California, they had been looking over their shoulders as federal agents conducted immigration sweeps.

Freedom, they felt, had become impossible in the land of the free. They had made a decision: Leave America and move back to Mexico.

People who’ve broken the law should be looking over their shoulders. They had 30 years to do something, to attempt to get some legal status. They didn’t. That’s on them.

Read: NY Times: All Those Illegal Alien Cases In Minnesota Are Pushing The System To The Brink »

UN Looking For A Global Tax On Fossil Fuels Companies

Once again, I’ll say that the fossil fuels companies should refuse to sell their products to the jackwads coming after them

Fossil fuel firms may have to pay for climate damage under proposed UN tax

Fossil fuel companies could be forced to pay some of the price of their damage to the climate, and the ultra-rich subjected to a global wealth tax, if new tax rules are agreed under the UN.

Negotiations on a planned global tax treaty will resume at the UN headquarters in New York on Monday, with dozens of countries supporting stronger rules that would make polluters pay for the impact of their activities.

But developing countries are worried the current draft of the proposals is too weak, and want more robust backing from the rich world. Clear proposals on taxing the profits of fossil fuel companies have been watered down in their language, and proposals for a global asset registry that would help in taxing wealthy individuals have been removed from the text.

Marlene Nembhard Parker, main delegate for Jamaica at the negotiations for the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, said: “In the context of Hurricane Melissa, which wiped the equivalent of 40% off our GDP overnight, it is time that the draft template text on sustainable development gets fleshed out. A much clearer link now needs to be made to environmental taxation and climate change, with clearer agreements on the actions that must be taken, nationally and internationally, particularly for the countries and industries who are most responsible.”

Oh. So it’s all a shakedown. Without fossil fuels no one would be going to Jamaica. The flights and cruise ships to get there, the vehicles to move people around, air conditioning, food, products, and so much more. People who use a ton of fossil fuels want to make it more expensive for other people, and, let’s be honest, most of the people who push these taxes are rich, and often have taxpayers pick up the tab for their travel.

Read: UN Looking For A Global Tax On Fossil Fuels Companies »

Trump Admin Looking To Slowly Wind Down Minneapolis Immigration Operations

All it took was having state, county, and local authorities work with federal authorities

Trump administration to withdraw 700 immigration agents from Minnesota

The Trump administration will withdraw 700 federal immigration agents from Minnesota, border czar Tom Homan said Wednesday. The move comes weeks after agents killed two U.S. citizens, sparking protests across the country.

“My goal, with the support of President Trump, is to achieve a complete drawdown and end this surge, as soon as we can,” Homan said at a news conference.

He reiterated that immigration efforts would continue and that agents would not solely target undocumented criminals.

“If you’re in the country illegally, you are not off the table,” Homan said. “Let me be clear, President Trump fully intends to achieve mass deportations during this administration, and immigration enforcement actions will continue every day throughout this country.”

Well, really, the operation wasn’t going to continue forever. They picked up a buttload of illegals (around 4,000), put fear in the rest, and move on to another city. No point in keeping 3,000 federal officers in Minneapolis and the surrounding areas.

Homan said that the drawdown is partly a result of cooperation between Minnesota county jails and federal immigration officials, making it easier for immigration authorities to apprehend targets. Homan asked for such cooperation from state and local authorities over the last week.

“This is smarter enforcement, not less enforcement,” he said, adding that local authorities will not be conducting immigration enforcement.

When an illegal is busted just contact ICE. When ICE puts a detainer on an illegal give them up. It’s that simple. They were arrested for a reason.

Meanwhile, the irony

Read: Trump Admin Looking To Slowly Wind Down Minneapolis Immigration Operations »

Pirate's Cove