Sierra Club Comes Out In Favor Of Amnesty For “Environmental Reasons”

It’s funny how so many “climate change” believers tend to espouse the same political views as hard core leftists, isn’t it?

(Grist) It was notable when Bill McKibben of 350.org and Philip Radford of Greenpeace recently came out in support of immigration-reform legislation.

But it’s really notable that the Sierra Club has now joined them. Over the past decade and a half, the club has had vicious leadership battles over immigration and population. But now the board of directors, which is elected by the group’s 1.4 million members, is unanimously agreed.

Why? Here’s their official position

Currently at least 11 million people live in the U.S. in the shadows of our society. Many of them work in jobs that expose them to dangerous conditions, chemicals and pesticides, and many more of them live in areas with disproportionate levels of toxic air, water, and soil pollution. To protect clean air and water and prevent the disruption of our climate, we must ensure that those who are most disenfranchised and most threatened by pollution within our borders have the voice to fight polluters and advocate for climate solutions without fear.

Which is weird, because so many environmental groups have failed to fight for environmental conditions in low income areas. But, anyway, apparently we need to provide a “pathway to voting Democrat citizenship” to stop hotcoldwetdry.

Read: Sierra Club Comes Out In Favor Of Amnesty For “Environmental Reasons” »

If All You See…

…is a horrendous flooded drought world, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Bookworm Room, with a post on bullying by schools.

Read: If All You See… »

Noted 1%er Complains About Policy Benefiting 1%

Nope, not Obama this time. It’s Paul Krugman, who never met a Big Government spending scheme he didn’t like. He starts out by whining about “austerity” and saying it has failed, because we’ve had just so darned much! You know, with the ever increasing government expenditures, the massive Stimulus, son of Stimulus, 2nd cousin twice removed of Stimulus….I’d love to know just where this austerity is. The federal government is borrowing roughly 43 cents for every dollar it spends. Anyway, here’s a guy with a net worth of over $2.5 million dollars who gets paid more than enough to fit into Obama’s version of rich

(Fish Wrap) And this makes one wonder how much difference the intellectual collapse of the austerian position will actually make. To the extent that we have policy of the 1 percent, by the 1 percent, for the 1 percent, won’t we just see new justifications for the same old policies?

Strange. The Democrats have held the Senate since 2007. They held the House from 2007-2011. Yet, so many of the big money spent benefited….the rich. Who does Obama hang out with and invite to the White House for parties? 1%ers. Obama is a 1%er. Democrat policies have made it harder and harder for small businesses to succeed and thrive. Heck, to even start. Dem policies put businesses down leading to the non-1% being laid off. Dem policy has left record numbers of Americans dropping out of the jobs market in despair.

Oh, and has Paul sent a check to the IRS yet? I bet he’d be pretty darned unhappy if Congress changed the tax rate he pays to a point where he pays lots more.

Read: Noted 1%er Complains About Policy Benefiting 1% »

OFA Launches Campaign To Attack Climate Realists In Congress

The totally independent from Obama (snicker) group Organizing For Action continues the Neverending Campaign

(UK Guardian) The campaign group formed to support Barack Obama’s political agenda has launched an initiative to shame members of Congress who deny the science behind climate change.

In an email to supporters on Thursday, Organizing for Action said it was time to call out members of Congress who deny the existence of climate change, saying they had blocked efforts to avoid its most catastrophic consequences.

The email linked to a video mocking Republicans who reject the science on climate change. “Right now, way too many lawmakers in Washington flat-out refuse to face the facts when it comes to climate change,” Jon Carson, executive director of Organizing for Action wrote in the email. “We’re never going to make real progress on this issue unless members of Congress get serious.”

I’ll write it again: if you are referring to it as “climate change” you aren’t interested in science, but, rather, in politics and social issues. It’s an imprecise and non-scientific term designed to allow the adherents to blame virtually everything on Mankind in any way they want, and to also blame cooling, snow, cold winters and plateau periods on man induced warming.

Surprisingly, the video fails to attack Obama for being a massive climahypocrite, what with all his fossil fueled flights around the country (especially for vacations), for his fossil fueled vehicles, for keeping the White House well about what Warmists think is the proper heating temperature, prolificate waste of food, not buying local, and so on.

Lord Christopher Monckton defends the GOP folks in the video as truthsayers. Marc Morano provides lots of rebuttals to OFA, and makes absolutely no distinction between the supposedly independent OFA and Obama himself. Because there is none except on paper. Twitchy offers up some derisive Tweets back to OFA. And OFA forgot to bring facts

Read: OFA Launches Campaign To Attack Climate Realists In Congress »

GOP Challenges DHS On Ammo Purchases

I haven’t really touched on the massive ammo purchases made by the Department Of groping people letting criminal illegal aliens go deeming Conservatives terrorists Homeland Security over the past 2 years or more. So much of what was out there seemed to be more in the way of conspiracy theories. I’m not particularly concerned with some sort of crackdown by DHS on citizens. But, Congress does have a few concerns….well, Republicans do. Liberals, not so much, because a Dem is in the White House

(Fox News) Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz said Thursday that the Department of Homeland Security is using roughly 1,000 rounds of ammunition more per person than the U.S. Army, as he and other lawmakers sharply questioned DHS officials on their “massive” bullet buys.

“It is entirely … inexplicable why the Department of Homeland Security needs so much ammunition,” Chaffetz, R-Utah, said at a hearing.

..Republicans said the purchases raise “serious” questions about waste and accountability.

Chaffetz, who chairs one of the House oversight subcommittees holding the hearing Thursday, revealed that the department currently has more than 260 million rounds in stock. He said the department bought more than 103 million rounds in 2012 and used 116 million that same year — among roughly 70,000 agents.

Comparing that with the small-arms purchases procured by the U.S. Army, he said the DHS is churning through between 1,300 and 1,600 rounds per officer, while the U.S. Army goes through roughly 350 rounds per soldier.

A DHS spokesman said that DHS was not trying to purchase 1.5 billion rounds over 5 years, just 750 million. And that they weren’t trying to stockpile. Republicans complain about the sheer waste.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., who chairs the full Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said he suspects rounds are being stockpiled, and then either “disposed of,” passed to non-federal agencies, or shot “indiscriminately.”

I suspect that DHS is doing this for two reasons: 1st, because they can, and like any government agency, they like wasting money that’s not theirs because they can. Second, I suspect that they are trying to purchase lots of ammo in order to do what they can to dry the private market up and increase consumer costs. Let’s not forget that when Obama assumed the Presidency the military started destroying used cartridges instead of selling them back to the market, and are still doing it. Brass is the most expensive part, and this is a huge waste of taxpayer dollars.

(The Blaze) Republicans in the Senate and House are expected to introduce a joint bill Friday that would limit the amount of ammunition that federal agencies are allowed to buy and stockpile over the next six months, the Washington Free Beacon reports.

The bill, titled the Ammunition Management for More Accountability or “AMMO” Act, is being proposed after several lawmakers have voiced concerns about some federal agencies, like the Department of Homeland Security, seemingly stockpiling large quantities of ammo.

Expect a lively discussion in the House, with Democrats trotting out looney tune speeches. The norm.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: GOP Challenges DHS On Ammo Purchases »

Good Grief: Al Franken Uses Cheetos Metaphor To Push “Climate Change”

Hey, has anyone asked Al how he gets to D.C. from Minnesota and back? (via Tom Nelson)

(HuffPo) Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) attacked climate deniers with a Cheetos metaphor on the Senate floor on Monday, saying those who take money from big coal and also reject global warming should be ignored.

“If 98 out of 100 doctors tell me I’ve got a problem, I should take their advice,” he said. “And if those two other doctors get paid by Big Snack Food, like certain climate deniers get paid by Big Coal, I shouldn’t take their advice.”

Well, what of those who push hotcoldwetdry? Should we ignore those who fail to practice what they preach? Particularly since there are way, way, way more of those than Climate Realists who take money from Big Coal (or any other group).

Read: Good Grief: Al Franken Uses Cheetos Metaphor To Push “Climate Change” »

If All You See…

…is an evil pump spewing evil fossil fuels, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Patterico’s Pontifications, with a post wondering just what the motivation could be for a violent attack involving “Allahu Akbar!”

Read: If All You See… »

An ObamaCare Waiver For Congress, White House, And Staff?

Otherwise, their might be a “brain drain”

(Politico) Congressional leaders in both parties are engaged in high-level, confidential talks about exempting lawmakers and Capitol Hill aides from the insurance exchanges they are mandated to join as part of President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul, sources in both parties said.

The talks — which involve Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), the Obama administration and other top lawmakers — are extraordinarily sensitive, with both sides acutely aware of the potential for political fallout from giving carve-outs from the hugely controversial law to 535 lawmakers and thousands of their aides. Discussions have stretched out for months, sources said.

We certainly can’t blame the Republicans, who want the law gone in the first place. Democrats, though, could be in a bit of trouble if they vote to exempt Congress, the White House, and their staffs.

There is concern in some quarters that the provision requiring lawmakers and staffers to join the exchanges, if it isn’t revised, could lead to a “brain drain” on Capitol Hill, as several sources close to the talks put it.

Read: An ObamaCare Waiver For Congress, White House, And Staff? »

Hooray! Warmists Conveniently Say Ocean Is Eating 90% Of The Warmth

It’s all so very convenient that the New Climate Deniers come up with a way to proclaim that Mankind is still the main culprit, it’s just that the heat is disappearing into the deep oceans (which they can’t really prove). Since it has been exposed that there has been a pause in warming, with no statistically significant warming since 1997 (really, 1990, since the global temp has gone up just .28F since 1990 and .14F since 1997), Warmists have trotted out lots of “theories”, such as soot, that the melting Arctic is causing a dip in the jet stream which causes it to get cold, and others. Over the past month or so they’ve tried the “deep ocean” prognostication, and here’s more

(UK Guardian) The rate of heat building up on Earth over the past decade is equivalent to detonating about 4 Hiroshima atomic bombs per second. Take a moment to visualize 4 atomic bomb detonations happening every single second. That’s the global warming that we’re frequently told isn’t happening.

.28F since 1990. Those bombs must be some serious duds. Oh, and what the Guardian is writing doesn’t provide Human causation.

There are periods when the ocean heats up more quickly than the surface, and other periods when the surface heats up more quickly than the oceans. Right now we’re in a period of fast ocean warming and overall, global warming is continuing at a very fast pace.

.14F. Hard facts are pesky.

The confusion on this subject lies in the fact that only about 2 percent of global warming is used in heating air, whereas about 90 percent of global warming goes into heating the oceans (the rest heats ice and land masses). But humans live at the Earth’s surface, and thus we tend to focus on surface temperatures. Over the past 10–15 years, Earth’s surface temperature has continued to rise, but slowly. At the same time, the warming of the oceans – and the warming of the Earth as a whole – has accelerated.

It’s all so convenient. Have I pointed out that correlation is not causation? The Warmist doctrine of Mankind’s release of CO2 has not abated, yet, the warming has not continued, and there are plenty of natural forces at play in terms of ocean heat. The author, a typical Warmist, mentions La Nina’s and El Nino’s, but still wants to blame Mankind. But, the point here is simply to find a convenient scapegoat to blame for the lack of warming and the failure of the computer “models”. John Abraham even trots out the GIF from the far left Skeptical Science (often trotted out in the comments at Right Wing News)

If anything, this little chart further proves that the warming since the end of the Little Ice Age is natural, otherwise you wouldn’t have all these fits and starts, and even cooling. Warmists will never change their tune because ‘Climate change” is not about science, but about politics and pushing their far left fascistic big government redistributive policies.

During periods with more La Niñas, surface temperatures temporarily flatten out. But global warming does not. As long as humans continue to increase the greenhouse effect by burning massive quantities of fossil fuels, the planet will continue to warm, as is clear from the acceleration of global warming since 2000.

OK, there you go, Warmists, give up all your fossil fueled travel. All. Not some. All. You won’t, though. You never do.

Read: Hooray! Warmists Conveniently Say Ocean Is Eating 90% Of The Warmth »

Zakaria: Hey, Those Two Tsarnaev Boys Mean We Need Better Integration Of Muslims

More importantly, the media narrative that Boston was just some minor event with no links to any wider Muslim extremist movement continues, as witnessed in Fareed Zakaria’s op-ed

As we learn more about the brothers Tsarnaev, we are inclined to ask larger questions about their apparent descent into terror. What does it tell us about radical Islam, Russian immigrants, Muslim communities and the breakdown of assimilation? The most accurate answer might turn out to be: not much. Larger phenomena might be at work — but these two young men might not reflect any rise or intensification of trends. It seems they are just two alienated youths who turned toward hate and then, allegedly, to murder.

That was the point the brothers’ uncle Ruslan Tsarni made when he called his nephews “losers.” He was arguing against the notion that the boys represented a larger community. He and his family, after all, were part of the same Chechen migration to the United States and are well-adjusted, law-abiding and thoroughly American.

Of course, there’s the point where the CIA wanted the older brother on a watch list, and Russia was pushing the FBI hard to watch Tamerlan, something they rarely do. There’s lots and lots of material that they continued to radicalize. They were more than just “alienated youths”. Those folks don’t generally fly halfway across the world to an area known to support and train Islamic jihadis. But the point is to attempt to divest this attack from the wider world of Islamic terrorism.

Since 9/11, foreign-inspired terrorism has claimed about two dozen lives in the United States. (Meanwhile, more than 100,000 have been killed in gun homicides and more than 400,000 in motor-vehicle accidents.) One crucial reason the number of terrorism deaths is so low is that America does not have large pools of alienated immigrants. Polls repeatedly have shown that Muslim immigrants to the United States embrace core American values. The American assimilation machine continues to function well.

So, the Leftist cries of “Islamaphobia!!!!!!!” are pretty much a bunch of mule fritters. And, let’s be clear: the government has done a decent job in uncovering plots here in the US. Also, much like in Europe, the Islamists are careful and intent on forcing their hardcore Islam views peacefully. Europe has seen this occur for a much longer period of time, where Sharia has integrated itself into the laws of many countries, or the hardcore Muslims have been allowed to have their own separate legal system from the rest of the nation. That’s what the Islamists push here, taking advantage of the Left’s “multiculturalism” and “diversity” craziness, along with the Left’s willfull blind eye to the actions, which leads Leftists to freak out any time the Islamists are attacked.

Rather than ostracize or embarrass Muslims in the wake of Boston, the smarter move would be even greater outreach — so that the next time someone began to act strangely, community leaders would pick up the phone and call their friends in the police.

That sounds exactly like the argument to legalize the illegal aliens. A better idea would be to attempt to Westernize those who are in danger of going down the road to hardcore Islam, getting them away from that life. The point Zakaria is attempting with this is to get America to change, not to get the Muslims to change. As one person at the WP comments

For a week, Fareed thought about this vicious attack by Jihadis that killed and maimed almost 200 Americans.

You know what he came up with?

Americans aren’t welcoming enough to potential terrorists that we allow to move here.

True: this seems to be another Blame America first article, along with saying that there is no wider meaning with any links to radical Islam. You can bet Fareed would be blaming the whole if these guys had been NRA members, TEA Partiers, or Romney voters.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Zakaria: Hey, Those Two Tsarnaev Boys Mean We Need Better Integration Of Muslims »

Pirate's Cove