People who use lots of fossil fuels tell us that we should make them more expensive and install a government Ponzi scheme. Here’s Judy Hindley of the Citizens Climate Lobby UK in the nutty UK Guardian
Stop climate change, don’t ‘adapt’ to it
While I appreciate your work in keeping the spotlight on the global heatwave (World on fire: the rise of the 50C city, G2, 13 August), I’m scared by the emphasis of your correspondents and leader writers on “adapting†to climate change (Letters, 11 July). You don’t “adapt†to a raging fire, do you? You have to stop it. And the first thing you need to do is stop pouring fuel on it.
Leading scientists worldwide now agree that the main cause of the climate crisis is the burning of fossil fuels, and leading economists agree that the solution is to price fossil fuels out of the market. Until that happens, we will be paying – with our health, our lives and our children’s future.
Why don’t we hear more about this? Two main reasons, perhaps: our economy is largely run on fossil fuels, and those on low incomes suffer most from higher energy prices. Yet there’s a solution.
And that solution?
It’s over six years since the leading scientist Dr James Hansen – in a historic TED talk on climate change, which laid out how his warnings had been suppressed in his 30-year tenure as director of Nasa’s Goddard Institute – memorably declared that “the greatest tragedy is that it would be so easy to stop itâ€.
What is needed, he said, is a substantial, rising fee on fossil fuels, imposed at the source (oil well, coal pit, port of entry) – with the revenue not kept by the government but returned to every citizen in equal shares.
This would not only ease the transition for those on low incomes but promote every kind of green behaviour, as well as incentivising the development and deployment of alternative energy sources. It’s an elegant solution – easy to implement, transparent in its operation, immediate in its effect, and fair.
See? It’s so easy. Tax the hell out of fossil fuels companies, and then the government will magnanimously give money to low income people who’ve seen their cost of living skyrocket, making them even more dependent on government. And if you’re dependent on government, they own you. And can force you to engage in said “green behavior.”
https://twitter.com/WilliamTeach/status/1029707197742309376
Now, if only all these Warmists would give up their own use of fossil fuels.
Read: We Should Abolish ‘Climate Change’, Not Adapt To It Or Something »
No telling if writer Kelly Heyboer wrote the headline or someone else did. Let’s see what she did write
On excessively hot days, there are more likely to be fatal car accidents and food safety problems, and police officers and government food inspectors tend to do less of their duties, according to a study published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
An apocalyptic computer model, processed by one of the world’s largest computers in 1973, has predicted 
This shows that the world cannot sustain the current level of population and industrial growth for more than two decades.
(that’s the headline on the web front page. Inside the article it’s “Meet with Mueller already, Mr. President”
The notion of the commons refers to shared land, publicly available for all people to access for leisure and when times get tough, for survival. Publicly shared lands have existed since humans first walked the earth but have progressively been enclosed for individual sustenance or for profit. The most profound period of enclosures came with the introduction of European capitalism, and mass displacement of agricultural people to toil in industrial factories.
Our atmosphere, a publicly needed space containing many vital resources such as nitrogen, oxygen, and carbon dioxide—may seem to the untrained eye to be the tragedy of the commons playing out above our heads. But this is hardly the case, and one must only take their head out of the clouds and refocus on the social developments on-the-ground to see that climate change is really the tragedy of the enclosures, the inevitable consequence of capitalist privatization.
