Bummer: Global Movement To Reduce Carbon Intensity Has Flat-Lined

Much like the global temperature since 1990, but this really, really upsets Warmist Jeff Spross at Joe Romm’s highly partisan and George Soros funded Climate Progress

The global effort to produce less carbon-intensive completely stalled over the last two decades, according to a new reportby the International Energy Agency. The paper put together a measure of carbon intensity — how much carbon is released per unit of energy created — and found its essentially been flat in the United States since 1990, while dropping slightly for Europe and rising for China

The combined result was that the carbon intensity of the world’s energy production dropped 6 percent from 1971 to 1990, but then flat-lined afterwards.

The headline wonders why this has happened. After some blah blah blah and noting that energy usage has double (which is apparently a big problem for the Warmists when it comes to other people, especially the people in “developing countries”, having energy) we get

Instead, thanks to our refusal to put a price on carbon, America remains the single largest subsidizer of fossil fuels in the world. Instead of doing the heavy lifting on renewables ourselves, we’re leaving the less fortunate of the world to carry the burden.

Why would we put a price on carbon? It’s not carbon that Warmists say is the problem, it’s carbon dioxide. There’s a big difference. The very fact that Warmists refuse to use proper terminology shows they care little for science and a lot for social movements.

Read: Bummer: Global Movement To Reduce Carbon Intensity Has Flat-Lined »

If All You See…

…is snow that schoolchildren will now see because it has gotten warm enough, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Nice Deb, with a post on Glenn Beck telling the Obama regime to come clean on the Boston Saudi.

Read: If All You See… »

Here Comes Another “The Science Is Settled (stomps foot)” Opinion Piece

It’s just a little one feature in the Bowdoin Orient by Hugh Ratcliffe, but amusing nonetheless

There is no longer a scientific debate concerning the existence of climate change. Despite what the National Association of Scholars may claim, anthropogenic warming is not a premise to believe in but rather a scientific fact. In the past few weeks the College has seen a frenzy of debates, panels and meetings dedicated to issues of climate change and sustainability. But what seems to be missing from the discussion is an acknowledgement of the gravity of the situation—just what it is that’s at stake.

Climate change is an unscientific term. Warmists have been attempting to shut down debate for decades. A .08C increase in global temps since 1990, and .28F since 1997. Not exactly doom worthy. Warmists are not interested in science, because science is always debatable.

Stopping climate change is not just about saving the polar bear. It’s not about hotter summer afternoons and it’s certainly not about the rise of the Prius. In a 2009 address, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said that climate change “is the greatest collective challenge we face as a human family.” Unfortunately climate change is insidious, and by the time we realized it was occurring, it had already been going on for nearly a century. Yet we have already begun to feel the disastrous consequences of a warming climate all across the globe, and it is only going to get worse.

How much worse can .08C over 20+ years be? Hugh follows up with lots of things Doooooom!!!! in the future. So, what does Hugh recommend?

Sustainability and divestment may indeed be the sacrifices Bowdoin must make to play its part. As an elite institution dedicated to the common good, we don’t do nearly enough to fight against the real effects of climate change.

Ah. Divestment. The current Warmist trope where they want schools and businesses to stop all links with evil fossil fuels companies, yet, Hugh, like most Warmists, refuses to tell us what changes he’s made in his own life, nor does he recommend changes for others. Strange, that, wouldn’t you say? I bet he drinks lots of CO2 infused beer and takes road trips in fossil fueled vehicles.

Read: Here Comes Another “The Science Is Settled (stomps foot)” Opinion Piece »

NY Times Notices Lots Of People Stuck In Part Time/Low Pay Jobs

They can’t quite get over their extreme liberal bias to note that this is the state of the Obama economy, but it’s a start!

(Part-Time Work Becomes Full-Time Wait for Better Job)

The American economy has generated 30 straight months of job growth. But for millions of people looking for more work and greater income, that improvement provides little solace.

In March, 7.6 million Americans who want more hours were stuck in part-time jobs, about the same as a year earlier and three million more than there were when the recession began at the end of 2007.

These almost invisible underemployed workers do not count toward the standard jobless rate of 7.6 percent. A broader measure, which includes the involuntary part-timers as well as people who want to work but have stopped looking, stands at 13.8 percent.

Let’s not forget about all the people who’ve dropped out of the jobs market in despair, sitting at levels not seen since the malaise era of Jimmy Carter.

Even for those who have been able to take advantage of the better job market, the opportunities have not been good. Since the economy began to recover almost four years ago, hiring has been concentrated in relatively low-wage service sectors, like retailing, home health care, and food preparation, and in contingent jobs at temporary-hiring companies. For example, nearly one out of every 13 jobs is at a restaurant, bar or other food-service establishment, a record high.

Remember the good old days during Bush’s presidency when the media and Bush hating liberals whined about all the jobs being “bad jobs” because many were low paying, though the unemployment rate was much lower than today and far fewer people had dropped out of the jobs market? Now we see that the Obama economy is about low paying jobs and part time jobs, despite the massive amount of money, much of it (43 cents on the dollar) borrowed by President Obama and Congressional Democrats.

While increases in part-time and temporary work can sometimes be an early sign that employers will soon take on more permanent hiring, many workers have been trapped in such jobs far longer than they had anticipated.

Not in the Obameconomy, where they are now the new norm, and this condition will get worse as Obamacare kicks in and companies scale back hours and jobs to avoid the draconian requirements (which the Times eventually points out).

But, hey, this is what you voted for, America. You thought Obama was cool and super awesome and forgot that his policies have been disasters. So, suck it up.

Read: NY Times Notices Lots Of People Stuck In Part Time/Low Pay Jobs »

NJ Gov. Christie Announces Lots Of Gun/People Control

Hey, remember when some Conservatives were really hot to trot with Chris Christie, and really wanted him to run for President, or at least be on the ticket as VP? And some said “hey, um, he may have some good qualities for Conservatives, but, really, he’s about as squishy a Republican as it gets?” Yeah, um

(NJ 101.5) Gov. Chris Christie unveiled gun control and violence prevention measures that are as comprehensive as they are ambitious.

Christie acknowledges there is no way to prevent all violence in our society, but he says it is the job of government to question, to scrutinize and to demand more in an attempt to address the problem.

The plan calls for expanding New Jersey’s already strict gun control laws, expanding government-funded mental health treatment, making it more difficult for kids buy or rent violent video games, requiring that would-be gun owners show government-issued IDs and bolstering penalties for gun-related crimes.

“It’s hard for me to sit here today and say, ‘If all these things got imposed we’d see an ‘X’ percentage drop in gin violence in this state.’ I don’t know,” said Christie. “Bad people are going to do bad things and so, would greater penalties deter people? You hope they do.”

So, he has no idea if anything he proposes will do a damned thing, but he’s going to push it anyhow. So, what’s he want to do?

  • Strengthen the state’s existing background check requirement by mandating that mental health records are included in the instant background check process at the time of a firearm purchase (so, make it easier to violate a citizens privacy rights and break doctor/patient confidentiality)
  • Require firearms purchasers to present a valid government photo ID, along with the already mandatory Firearms Purchaser Identification Card. (Hey, if we aren’t allowed to ask for ID to vote, we should we require ID to purchase a firearm, which is a constitutional right?)
  • Limit kids access to violent video games (yeah, that’ll happen in the Real World)
  • He does apparently want to increase penalties on people who use guns in crime, make straw purchases, trafficking, and others. Also potentially violating the Constitution by jacking up the bail requirements. (Now, if he’d add corporal punishment, I might forgive the other stuff.)

But, refer back to the part about him not having a clue in the world if any of this would make a difference. And NJ already has some of the toughest gun laws in the country, so this is simply piling on to the draconian restrictions already placed on law abiding citizens.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: NJ Gov. Christie Announces Lots Of Gun/People Control »

Crazy Uncle Cuomo Links Boston Bombing And Climate Change

Let’s be perfectly clear, Gov Cuomo was stating it’s all kinda the same, but just to bring the two up together is facepalm worthy

(Politicker) “It’s a terrible situation in Boston. And, unfortunately, … one gets the sense that this is more reflective of the ‘new normal,’ if you will,” he explained. “So much of society is changing so rapidly. We talk about a ‘new normal’ when it comes to climate change and adjusting to a change in the weather patterns. ‘New normal’ when it comes to public security in a post-9/11 world. Where these random acts of violence, which at one time were implausible, now seem all-too-frequent.”

Read: Crazy Uncle Cuomo Links Boston Bombing And Climate Change »

If All You See…

…are waves that could get bigger/smaller because Someone Else refuses to pay a carbon tax, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Maggie’s Farm, with a post on the lame duck president.

Read: If All You See… »

Hooray! Hotcoldwetdry Causing “New Kind Of Storm” In Chicago

You know, the kind of “climate change” which has seen a tiny uptick of .08C since 1990

Climate change leaves Chicago area in deep water

It wasn’t a hurricane, but nearly five inches of rain fell in the Chicago area Thursday.

“This is a new kind of storm associated with climate change,” said Tom LaPorte, spokesman for the Chicago Department of Water Management. “It’s been around for five or six years. Other storms are rather local, but in this case the entire region got really walled.”

Interesting that other storms are rather local, but not in Chicago! It’s “climate change”!!!!!!1!!!! Every weather event is now blamed on “climate change”, and, to be clear, they mean Man-induced climate change. All Chicago area Warmists should immediately give up their fossil fueled travel.

Read: Hooray! Hotcoldwetdry Causing “New Kind Of Storm” In Chicago »

Marco Rubio Steps As Squishy Republican Spokesperson For Shamnesty

The more we learn about the Gang Of 8 immigration bill, the more we find out just how flawed it is. Liberals seem to love it, which should be the first clue that when all is said and done, it will simply be an amnesty bill. Shame. They could have done something that made sense, that truly put teeth in securing the southern border, holding those who come legally first and then overstay their visas accountable, and finding ways to do what we can to make sure that people do not become illegal aliens (such as holding companies that hire them accountable with massive fines and criminal penalties and restricting public money and services from them). Alas, no. And Rubio is ruining his brand

(USA Today) Florida Sen. Marco Rubio spent about 15 minutes with conservative radio host Lars Larson on Thursday defending a sweeping immigration bill he and seven of his colleagues unveiled just hours before.

When Rubio was done, Larson’s first three callers complained that the bill would reward people who broke the law to be here, and they didn’t believe the border would be secured as the senators promise.

The interview illustrated that Rubio, a Republican and favorite of the Tea Party, will have difficulty convincing conservatives who have helped kill past attempts at immigration overhauls that the time is right to back his effort.

At this point Rubio is appearing to be more of a John McCain/Lindsay Graham Republican squish. He’s essentially on a “charm offensive” to sell this crap-burger of an immigration bill to Conservatives, a bill which is set up similar to Obamacare. Remember how far left Democrats threw in a few features that were popular, such as not being able to be denied insurance for pre-existing conditions? Yet, those were surface offerings, simply designed to make that crap-sandwich popular while the other 90% of Obamacare was horrific. Same with this Gang of 8 immigration bill.

But other Republicans said that Rubio is just what the party needs right now. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., has been candid about the need to gain ground with Hispanic voters after GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney garnered only 27% of the Hispanic vote in the 2012 election.

Lionel Sosa, a San Antonio-based media consultant who advised the campaigns of the last three Republican presidents, said that with the rise of the Tea Party, it’s become more difficult in recent years to walk the line between courting Hispanic voters while appeasing the “very, very conservative elements” of the party on immigration.

If the price of “courting Hispanics” is to provide amnesty for law breakers, then the price is too high. Particularly since, from all appearances, most will be Democrat Party voters. The mechanisms for securing the border seem weak and politically charged, and what we will see is mostly a token measure. And then we get more ObamaCare styled portions. Here’s the part about getting tax money out of illegals

(Politico) They chose the milder approach and punted the details to the Treasury Department and IRS to hash out down the road.

“Getting back taxes is incredibly difficult, particularly when someone has paid into a fraudulent Social Security number,” Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), a member of the gang, told POLITICO. “You might have a case where the government owes more back than it gets in. So I don’t know. We’ll leave that up to the IRS to figure how we do it.”

Punting on the issue puts the details in the hands of the experts, but it also means leaving a big question mark until after the bill is enacted.

This is the same thing they did with ObamaCare, namely, directing federal agencies to Do Something, leaving the details up to those agencies, rather than actually writing hard law. Which, much like ObamaCare, has created many unintended consequences and given the agencies, filled with hard left Progressives, the ability to make it up as they see fit. How much will the IRS spend to collect this money? Knowing the way the government works, they’ll probably spend more than they collect. If they bother trying.

Rubio may not be “cranky old John McCain”, but that matters little to Conservatives, who tend to look more at substance than flash. He’s putting his “compassion” for illegals over the rule of law, and if he thinks Conservatives are going to buy this legislation, he’s got another thing coming. Conservatives turned on Bush 43 when he pushed shamnesty and will do the same with Rubio.

Read: Marco Rubio Steps As Squishy Republican Spokesperson For Shamnesty »

One Boston Bomber Suspect Dead, 2nd On The Run

A very fluid situation, at least regarding the 2nd suspected Boston Marathon bomber.

(UK Daily Mail) One of the Boston bombing suspects is dead and the second is on the loose and said to be ‘armed and dangerous’ after a dramatic shootout in the suburbs of the city.

The terrorist dubbed ‘Suspect 1’ by the FBI died in hospital with multiple gunshot wounds and possible blast injuries after a fierce gun battle rocked the Watertown area hours after a police officer was shot dead at the nearby MIT campus.

The other, named today as 19-year-old Dzhokhar A. Tsarnaev, of Cambridge, Massachusetts, who was seen on CCTV wearing a white baseball cap, has gone on the run.

Boston Police Chief Ed Davis said: ‘There is a terrorist on the loose who wants to kill people – do not open your door’.

Today, sources said the suspects were believed to be from the Russia region near Chechnya and had lived in U.S. for at least one year.

According to the news coverage I was viewing as I woke up, the 2nd suspect was supposedly throwing devices on the ground for which the Boston bomb squad was called out, though none seemed to have any secondary explosions one would expect from a bomb.

Right now there are quite a few officers surrounding an area in Watertown with more and more officers streaming in, so it appears as if they have him surrounded.

So, it looks like the highly partisan Left will not get their wish that the bombers were Americans, preferably on the Right. Does this have anything to do with Islamic terrorism? Possibly, as there has been quite a bit of a problems with Islamists in Chechnya for quite some time, though it was generally aimed at the local area and at Russia. Why they would do this in Boston? That’s the $25,000 question. There were jihadis from Chechnya found in Iraq and Afghanistan. Is this related? Or just two wackos?

More: the name of the second suspect is nineteen year old Dzhokhar A. Tsarnaev. Everything is pretty much shut down in Boston. Schools, mass transit, you name it.

More: Law enforcement has been surrounding a home, explosions were heard, as were possible shots. Cops do not seem to be on as much edge as they were just 10 minutes ago, so, something happened. Perhaps a 3rd person of interest?

There are conflicting reports on when they came

Some are still saying all came recently. Some say the family came in 2002-2003, and older brother came recently. Wouldn’t change the fact that they are not homegrown domestic bombers, but foreigners linked to a country that is 90% Muslim with lots and lots of them being radicalized.

More: Over at Grist (which, as you might know, I tend to make fun of regarding “climate change” but is still one of my favorite sites), Jesse Zimmerman has some interesting, and disturbing, pictures of an empty Boston.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: One Boston Bomber Suspect Dead, 2nd On The Run »

Pirate's Cove