Hooray! Goverment Wastes $100k On Video Game About Hotcoldwetdry And Gender

By William Teach January 11, 2013 – 7:54 am

When conservatives talk about responsible spending and limited government, this is an example of what we’re talking about. It’s also a good example of Government being in the business of propaganda

(Daily Caller) A taxpayer-funded computer game produced by Spelman College features a black female protagonist battling the evil forces of climate change and gender issues.

Spelman College, a historically black women’s college in Atlanta, won a $100,000 grant from the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) to create an interactive computer game featuring a black female superhero. The game, which is called “HERadventure,” will be released on March 8 in celebration of International Women’s Day.

Spelman College did not respond to requests for comment, but a press release from the college describes the game as “a science fiction-based, multimedia platform project that… tackles social issues that permeate the daily reality of many women.”

What a fantastic use of taxpayer money! Some might say “it’s only $100,000, a drop in the bucket compared to what Los Federales spend.” True. Then add this to other wasteful projects and pork, and we’re talking about “real” money. Will the profits from the sale of this game…..ha, made myself laugh, like there will be any profits….reimburse the government taxpayer?

“Although it is the smorgasbord of politically correct elements that makes this project entertaining to write about, the bottom line is that the government has taken $100,000 from the taxpayers and given it to someone to develop a video game,” wrote Jeryl Bier of Speak With Authority, a conservative blog.

If the makers of the game were serious, they would have given up their fossil fueled lifestyles, sold their cars, and used the proceeds to make it. Or, better yet, not make it, because it causes the usage of lots of electricity to produce it and play it.

Read: Hooray! Goverment Wastes $100k On Video Game About Hotcoldwetdry And Gender »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Barking Moonbats, Global Warming, Liberal World | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

NRA Responds To White House Meeting: An Attack On The 2nd Amendment

By William Teach January 11, 2013 – 7:14 am

Apparently Joe Biden’s task force is looking to do exactly what we thought: restrict the rights of law abiding citizens

(NRA) The National Rifle Association of America is made up of over 4 million moms and dads, daughters and sons, who are involved in the national conversation about how to prevent a tragedy like Newtown from ever happening again.  We attended today’s White House meeting to discuss how to keep our children safe and were prepared to have a meaningful conversation about school safety, mental health issues, the marketing of violence to our kids and the collapse of federal prosecutions of violent criminals.

We were disappointed with how little this meeting had to do with keeping our children safe and how much it had to do with an agenda to attack the Second Amendment.  While claiming that no policy proposals would be “prejudged,” this Task Force spent most of its time on proposed restrictions on lawful firearms owners – honest, taxpaying, hardworking Americans.  It is unfortunate that this Administration continues to insist on pushing failed solutions to our nation’s most pressing problems.  We will not allow law-abiding gun owners to be blamed for the acts of criminals and madmen.  Instead, we will now take our commitment and meaningful contributions to members of congress of both parties who are interested in having an honest conversation about what works – and what does not.

Remember, back in 2007 and 2008 Obama told people that he believed in the 2nd Amendment and wasn’t coming for people’s guns. But, all Obama promises has expiration dates. Then there was Joe Biden, who railed against having his shotgun taken away (the NY Times called this his “Gunsmoke moment“).

It seems that as more time goes on we’re seeing that gun control advocates are looking to go after legal gun owners, rather than the criminals and finding ways to keep kids safe. You want to “close the gun show and private sale loopholes”? No problem. You want to start restricting the types of guns law abiding citizens can own and slapping all sorts of restrictions and creating more barriers for law abiding citizens? Problem. Restricting scary looking guns, ie, assault weapons? Didn’t make a difference last time. Magazine size down to 10? Won’t make a difference. Make violations of “gun free zones” more strict? Criminals intent on murder ‘n suicide won’t care.

And to expand on yesterday’s post about Obama’s strategy, Politico expands on that and points out Team Obama is going to run a divisive campaign, similar to his election campaigns, rather than attempting to convince American’s overall that common sense gun control is needed. We even find that Biden is breaking the liberals favorite “separation between church and state”

During one session with a dozen religious leaders on Wednesday, Biden made a specific request to those gathered to preach to their congregations about the importance of enacting stronger gun control laws, said the Rev. Michael McBride, a participant in the meeting and a community organizer for the PICO Network, an alliance of faith-based organizations.

The demonization of gun owners should start shortly.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: NRA Responds To White House Meeting: An Attack On The 2nd Amendment »

Posted in 2nd Amendment, Barry Obama, Democrats, Joe Biden | 4 Comments | Trackback URL

Hooray! Wake County School Board To Waste $45k Of Taxpayer Money

By William Teach January 10, 2013 – 4:08 pm

Yeah, something a bit local, which I do not do much of, but, anyhow, let’s put this in context: Republicans had captured control of the Wake County School Board, and looked to do a few things, which included doing away with “diversity” busing all over the county (which was really based on economic diversity rather than race), pushing for more local schooling, and reducing all the constantly changing school assignments. Then, Democrats regained control, and immediately fired the guy in charge of making things happen, Tony Tata, for no reason other than the Dems didn’t like him. So, now their is no school superintendent. What to do, what to do?

(WRAL) Nearly four months after firing Tony Tata, the Wake County Board of Education on Tuesday took the first step toward finding a new superintendent to lead North Carolina’s biggest school district by hiring a search firm.

The board approved a motion to hire Omaha, Neb.-based McPherson & Jacobson, LLC, a move that will cost the school system about $45,000. Details of the firm’s bid to lead the search were not made available Tuesday.

First of all, they couldn’t spend that money on a North Carolina company? Second of all, imagine what $45k could have done for the school system. Just another case of elected officials, particularly Democrats, making decisions that waste taxpayer dollars.

Read: Hooray! Wake County School Board To Waste $45k Of Taxpayer Money »

Posted in NC News | 7 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach January 10, 2013 – 1:00 pm

…is snow that’s a thing of the past but can be created by too much warmth, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Fire Andrea Mitchell, which notes 6 Islamists in the Obama administration.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 6 Comments | Trackback URL

NHL Lockout: Commish Bettman Apologizes To Fans

By William Teach January 10, 2013 – 11:27 am

In case you weren’t aware, the NHL locket is pretty much over. The Board of Governors has approved the new deal, and we’re just waiting on the Players Association to ratify it (which should come Sunday). Over the past few days I’ve read about some team owners apologizing to the fans, such as with the Buffalo Sabres and Carolina Hurricanes (more on this in a bit). Now we have Gary Bettman, the commissioner of the NHL, doing the same

(NJ.com) “To the players who were very clear they wanted to be on the ice and not negotiating labor contracts, to our partners who support the league financially and personally, and most importantly to our fans, who love and have missed NHL hockey, I’m sorry,” Bettman said in a press conference at a midtown hotel.

“I know that an explanation or an apology will not erase the hard feelings that have built up over the past few months, but I owe you an apology nevertheless.”

Blah blah blah, just like they did after the last work stoppage. I’ve heard rumors that the NHL and owners plan on running a “thank you” program as the season starts. Which is just like last time. I do not want to hear it. I don’t want to see it. Last time I didn’t even get flowers, this time I want diamonds. Supposedly, ticket prices were somewhat reduced last year. Here in Raleigh, they were. And then they jacked up the price of parking.

When it comes to the NHL, and particularly my NJ Devils, I am not a fan, I’m a fanatic. Yes, I will eventually come back. But, I think it would be very incumbent on the NHL and the owners to treat the fans well. No patronizing commercials and platitudes. Some, including me, have suggested that the NHL give their Center Ice programming away free. I’d say that if you were a subscriber last year, give Center Ice for free, or at least half of the price it would be for half a season. Better, why not half price and give away a practice jersey for the team of choice?

At the stadiums, more give away programs, discounted merchandise, contests to win signed and/or game worn apparel. Pucks. Sticks. Autographs. Take a bit off the top of tickets. Why not drop the price of all tickets 15-20% for the first 20 games?

The owners and players need to show that they really do care. There were no rule changes, so there isn’t anything super exciting coming down the pike like last time.

Otherwise, I’m really not excited. Usually as the season approaches I am psyched. Not so much now. And, listen, I’m a guy who has a ton of hockey paraphernalia. Lots of hats, shirts, and sweatshirts. I have a Canes and Devils jersey. I have 2 Devils jackets. Two watches. Pucks. Signed posters. Banners. And other stuff. A good chunk ended up around the living room the deeper the Devils went into the Playoffs last year. Hook me up, NHL!

More: BTW, I love how all the NHL prognosticators are beating up on the Devils. Every year it seems to be the same thing. They’re old. They’re boring. They won’t win. And almost every year the Devils make the Playoffs.  Remember, the Devils have missed the Playoffs twice since 1989. They’ve won 3 Cups, and made it to the Stanley Cup finals 5 times. They are in the top 3 for winning teams since 1990 (Red Wings #1, other team is Penguins). Fans of other hockey teams call them “boring”. Yeah, I guess they’d say that when the Devs just keep winning and beating those teams, especially with a great defense and a hall of fame bound goalie. Haters will be haters.

Read: NHL Lockout: Commish Bettman Apologizes To Fans »

Posted in Devils!!!!!, NHL, Sports | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

Warmist Idea To “Climate Proof” Cities Revolves Around Big Government

By William Teach January 10, 2013 – 9:51 am

I can tell, you’re shocked. And I’m sure that you’ve noticed that pretty much every idea to solve “climate change” revolves around bigger, more intrusive, and more domineering government. Here’s Warmist David Roberts at Grist

Climate-proofing cities: Not something conservatives are going to be good at

The notion of preparing cities for climate disruption is somewhat novel, though of course cities have always been built to adapt to natural conditions. What’s new is that almost all cities must now plan for changes in the natural conditions they take for granted — changes likely to be substantial but which, in their specifics, are maddeningly difficult to predict with precision or confidence. (snip)

As I was reading the piece — which is excellent, well worth tracking down — it struck me that the signal features of good climate-proofing have something in common: Conservatives are going to hate them.

1. Climate-proofing costs a lot of (government) money. (WT-shocker!)

2. It requires a lot of (government) planning. (more fascism)

3. It requires both physical and social density. (essentially, this would revolve around forcing people into big cities)

4. It requires decentralized systems. (government being able to change things without the input of pesky citizens)

5. It requires openness and adaptability. (changing things up regardless of whether it breaks existing laws, moors, and that pesky Constitution)

Dave goes on to give his own reasons for why Conservatives would hate these ideas, but misses that American Conservatives are actually Classical Liberals, and aren’t big on authority and government. On numbers 3 and 4 he writes

3. Conservatives are individualists, not communitarians

4. The conservative mind is, perhaps above all else, drawn to hierarchy and authority.

Number 3 is correct. Number 4 then contradicts. Number 4 would be about Classical Conservatives and, interestingly, Classical Socialists. Classical Conservatism is also referred to as Daddy Government in terms of involvement in people’s lives. American Conservatives are against that.

Finally, what’s missing is the notion of Warmists actually changing their own lives voluntarily to match their belief set.

Read: Warmist Idea To “Climate Proof” Cities Revolves Around Big Government »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Collapsing Science, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

Obama Attempts To Change Public Opinion On Gun

By William Teach January 10, 2013 – 9:23 am

Alas, public opinion is of no consequence, Barry, when the Right to own a weapon is enshrined in that pesky constitution thing. But, yapping is what Obama does best

(Washington Post) The White House is working with its allies on a well-financed campaign in Washington and around the country to shift public opinion toward stricter gun laws and provide political cover to lawmakers who end up voting for an assault-weapons ban or other restrictions on firearms.

With President Obama preparing to push a legislative agenda aimed at curbing the nation’s gun violence, pillars of his political network, along with independent groups, are raising millions of dollars and mapping out strategies in an attempt to shepherd new regulations through Congress.

I do find it interesting that Obama has railed against outside groups and their influence on government. And what these groups, and Obama, will attempt to do will be to come up with all sorts of scary stories as well as methods for demonizing anyone who stands in the way of what they deem “sensible gun control measures”.

Along the way, there will be all sorts of fundraisers and “spreading awareness” campaigns, along with attempts to intimidate legal gun owners, like the way the Journal News and Gawker attempted with their release of information about legal gun owners (which really put criminals in the drivers seat).

Then you have the possibility of Obama using executive orders to ram through his people-control, er, gun control agenda

Biden’s comments sparked an immediate and sharp backlash from Republicans. “The Founding Fathers never envisioned Executive Orders being used to restrict our Constitutional rights,” Rep. Jeff Duncan (S.C.) said in a statement. “We live in a republic, not a dictatorship.”

Not in Obama and Liberal World. Progressives are fascists, and love that Big Government dictatorial style.

Some of the groups plan to use television and newspaper advertisements to paint laws restricting guns as a mainstream, common-sense idea. Some advocates have also stopped calling their efforts “gun control,” preferring “gun-violence prevention” instead.

Yet, the majority of the proposed ideas and legislation is really aimed at law abiding citizens. Some lefties ask “why do you need a 19 round clip for your handgun? 10 should be enough” to which I’d reply “why do you need a 50 inch TV? Wouldn’t a 37 be fine?” Alternatively, I could go with “why? What’s it to you? Mind your own business.”

If Democrats were serious, they would be looking at solutions to protect people from criminals, and go after criminals. Make punishments harsh. Corporal punishment and hard labor would help. Instead, they want to make it harder for good citizens to have a gun for protection.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Obama Attempts To Change Public Opinion On Gun »

Posted in 2nd Amendment, Barry Obama, Current Affairs, Democrats | 7 Comments | Trackback URL

Why Obama’s Picking A Fight With Congress

By William Teach January 9, 2013 – 4:44 pm

My guess would be it’s because he’s an asshole. An intolerant, hyper-partisan, delusions of king-hood asshole. Also, because that’s who he is, a person who has never looked to work together, to bring people together. And, basically an asshole

(Politico) Barack Obama is looking for a few good fights.

Obama, the same president who campaigned twice on breaking the cycle of conflict in Washington, sees the utility — even the necessity — of rattling Republican cages as he plunges into a succession of upcoming battles over the nomination of Chuck Hagel as secretary of defense, the debt ceiling, $1 trillion in automatic budget cuts, immigration reform and gun control.

We’ve all known that what Obama says and what Obama does are two different things, at least in terms of governing and working together with people who disagree with him. And, because he’s an asshole. With delusions of king-hood

(CNN) President Barack Obama is exploring executive orders to help prevent mass shootings in America, Vice President Joe Biden said Wednesday.

“The president is going to act. Executive orders, executive action, can be taken,” Biden told reporters before meetings with groups representing survivors of mass shootings. “We haven’t decided what this is yet, but we’re compiling it all with the help of the attorney general and all the rest of the Cabinet members.”

Granted, this is Joe Biden saying it, and he could be going off the reservation (again). Yet, does anyone think that Obama isn’t thinking about bypassing the duly elected legislative branch?

Read: Why Obama’s Picking A Fight With Congress »

Posted in Barry Obama, Current Affairs, Democrats | 18 Comments | Trackback URL

Government Really Concerned About Regulating All The New Tech

By William Teach January 9, 2013 – 2:00 pm

When Conservatives talking about reducing the impact of Big Government, this is the kind of thing we are referring to

(Politico) What happens here at the annual Consumer Electronics Show certainly doesn’t stay here, at least not as far as Washington is concerned.

Stuffed into the seemingly endless Las Vegas Convention Center isn’t just a raft of new hi-def televisions, cutting-edge tablets and more — but a sea of federal lawmakers and regulators, many of whom return home leery to learn there’s a gap between the new tech on display and the laws that are supposed to govern their use.

The in-car computers populating the show floor may woo audiences. But they also should remind regulators there’s work to do to ensure the old rules of the road — literally — apply to cars that are as much computers as they are engines.

And the explosion of startups — many of which aren’t device manufacturers but app makers — represents the front lines of many debates over spectrum, e-health policy, venture capital and more now happening on Capitol Hill.

This reminds me of a Ronald Reagan quote

Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.

In today’s hyper regulatory government-space, we can also add in “if it might move, regulate it”. America is one of the most innovative countries over the past few centuries, yet, Government seems to do all it can to strangle everything with regulation. Sometimes “for your own good”, sometimes simply “because it’s there.”

Read: Government Really Concerned About Regulating All The New Tech »

Posted in Good Move Slick, Web/Tech | 13 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach January 9, 2013 – 1:00 pm

…is the flag of one of the world’s most evil carbon polluters, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Lonely Conservative, with a post on how Government is making your car less safe.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 3 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove