Good News: Trump’s EPA Head Pick Is Worse Than You Think

Worse, that is, if you are a member of the Cult of Climastrology, but, hey, the pick of Scott Pruitt will afford Warmists the extra ability to jump in their fossil fueled vehicles to go protest fossil fuels, plus, we know Lefties love living in apoplexy

Scott Pruitt, Trump’s Climate-Denying EPA Pick, Is Worse Than You Think

Every scientist not on the corporate dole is upset about Scott Pruitt, Donald Trump’s pick to head the Environmental Protection Agency.

This would be all those on the Public Dole.

Like Betsy DeVos, who wants to destroy public education, and Jeff Sessions, who wants to destroy the Voting Rights Act, Pruitt is against the very laws he will soon be in charge of enforcing.

He’s going to Destroy The Environment!!!!!

Now the shoe is on the other foot. Now it’s arch-conservatives who will be controlling the EPA, with exactly the same level of authority as the environmentalists who preceded them.

And make no mistake: Pruitt’s nomination is historic. No one has ever headed the EPA with his level of anti-science, anti-environmental record, which includes multiple lawsuits against the EPA intended to prevent the EPA from doing its job. Which is now supposed to be his job. He is also a state attorney general with no experience managing an organization like the EPA (budget: $7.7 billion), no scientific background, and close ties to the very industries he is supposed to be regulating.

Doom! This little unhinged Snowflake names 5 things that Pruitt will damage, but, this is typical asinine hysteria. The only thing Pruitt has been consistent on destroying are Hotcoldwetdry regulations. He has no record of wanting to destroy actual clean air, clean water, and clean land regulations. He certainly does want to reign in the consistent over-reaches and tyranny of the EPA. Nor can the article cite any sources to back up it’s hysteria that Pruitt will do what the article is proposing.

Read: Good News: Trump’s EPA Head Pick Is Worse Than You Think »

Mass Attorney General Maura Healey Really Doesn’t Want To Be Questioned On Her Climate Change Fascism

Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey is one of the leaders in the assault on Exxon, demanding all their documents in a stunning abuse of power in order to silence dissenters from the Cult of Climastrology. Exxon has sued her and the others involved, and she really doesn’t want to cooperate and transparent herself

(Inside Climate News) Without waiting for a ruling by a federal judge in Texas who has consistently sided with ExxonMobil, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey has filed an appeal to block her deposition scheduled for Tuesday.

Healey explained in a motion filed Thursday with the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that a stay is warranted because the judge who issued the deposition order has refused to properly consider her arguments and has not ruled on her pending motion to stay her deposition.

That judge, U. S. District Judge Ed Kinkeade, had earlier sided with Exxon in its request to depose Healey. He said he suspected the attorney general’s climate fraud investigation of the company may be biased. (snip)

At the same time Healey appealed the deposition order, she also filed an appeal to toss out Exxon’s entire case that seeks to block her investigation.

The Warmists like Healey are more than happy to demand everything from companies, but, are very unhappy when the Public demands the same from them.

“Requiring the Attorney General to explain her investigatory rationale at this stage would make a shambles of the investigation and stifle her gathering of facts,” according to the motion to dismiss the case.

“The only likely outcome of the discovery that the court has ordered is an improper and vexatious investigation into privileged or protected information.”

Interesting. Healey, along with her fellow AGs, want privileged and protected information, and beyond, from Exxon and lots of companies, citizens, and groups in this matter, forgetting that it is the government that must be transparent and non-dictatorial. That The People are innocent till proven guilty, and that it is illegal to go on witch hunts. That The People have rights from abusive government officials.

What will most likely happen is that the judge will deny her motions, and she may very well decline to be deposed, leading to contempt charges.

Crossed at Pirate’s Cove. Follow me on Twitter @WilliamTeach.

Read: Mass Attorney General Maura Healey Really Doesn’t Want To Be Questioned On Her Climate Change Fascism »

Duplicitous NY Times Suddenly Enthused By States Rights On Illegal Aliens

The Editorial Board of the NY Times really, really likes the notion of States and cities leading the resistance to something that hasn’t even happened in attempting to protect people who are….unlawfully present in the United States, people who decrease wages, take jobs from Americans, gum up the works at hospitals and cause emergency rooms to close, choke up the criminal justice system and prisons, commit identity fraud, kill and rape citizens, and so much more

California Looks To Lead The Trump Resistance

Nobody knows yet what Donald Trump is going to do to immigration enforcement. Only a month has passed since the election, and the president-elect is no different from the candidate: erratic, self-contradictory, hazy on principles and policies.

But states and cities that value immigrants, including the undocumented, do not have the luxury of waiting and hoping for the best. They are girding for a confrontation, building defenses to protect families and workers from the next administration.

That’s a nice bit of mental jujitsu, equating legal immigrants with illegals, proposing that Trump will go after the legals, which he has never discussed. Here’s where it gets cute, because they probably read their own previous work

Nothing in the [bills protecting illegals offered in California] would obstruct the federal government. This is not a nullification of federal laws or a rebellion against the Constitution. It’s upholding the Fourth Amendment, preventing unreasonable search and seizure, so mothers and fathers can go to work and children go to school without fear of losing one another. It’s upholding the First Amendment, so day laborers can solicit work on a sidewalk. It’s allowing the local police to keep the trust and cooperation of crime victims and witnesses, who will not fear every encounter as a prelude to deportation. (snip)

But the opposite is true: By drawing a bright line between federal immigration enforcement and local policing, the California Values Act would promote smarter, more effective law enforcement. Local officers would continue to keep the peace, and in the face of criminal threats — as validated by a warrant from a judge — would cooperate with federal agents. But if the Trump administration begins roundups of those who pose no danger, of minor offenders and noncriminals, staking out schools, churches, businesses and homes — they will not do its job for it.

Let’s jump back in time to 2010, to another NY Times editorial board piece

The Constitution Trumps Arizona

The Obama administration has not always been completely clear about its immigration agenda, but it was forthright Tuesday when it challenged the pernicious Arizona law that allows the police to question the immigration status of people they detain for local violations. Only the federal government can set or enforce immigration policy, the government said in its lawsuit against the state, and “Arizona has crossed this constitutional line.”

There is nothing terribly complicated about this principle, which is based on several aspects of the Constitution, acts of Congress, and Supreme Court decisions over the years. A patchwork of state and local immigration policies would cause havoc.

Well, the NYTEB seemed pretty clear in their notion about immigration policy, did it not? But, now that the law might actually be enforced by the Trump administration, the same NYTEB is enthused by this State’s Rights thing. They’ve done a bit of parsing in order to find a way for states and cities to blow off federal law, citing the 4th, forgetting that the law allows people to be arrested for being an illegal alien, and the 1st applies if the person is lawfully present in the U.S. or a citizen.

There’s always an excuse of duplicitous actions and thought in Liberal World.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Duplicitous NY Times Suddenly Enthused By States Rights On Illegal Aliens »

U Of Maryland Promises To Protect Illegals, Special Snowflakes Meltdown

This is possible one of the silliest Snowflake meltdown. Seriously, they’re getting what they want, and they’re still Outraged

(Daily Caller)  University of Maryland (UM) students were distressed and demanded an apology after the school’s president stood up for illegal immigrants, and used the Spanish language to do it.

The incident occurred Tuesday night, when UM president Wallace Loh delivered his annual state of the campus address. During his speech, Loh took a moment to defend illegal immigrants who attended the school, and used both English and Spanish to do it.

Several Snowflakes took exception to Loh actually speaking in Spanish, because, in the words of one who will be getting lots of rejection emails from employers, “does not represent the entire immigrant community here.” Another was upset because this implied a “Latinix” background. I guess there are a bunch of non-Latino illegal aliens at UM who need to be deported.

On the bright side, Loh refused to apologize, since Spanish is his first language. The article at The Diamondback paints Loh as a progressive Social Justice Warrior himself, but, even that is not enough for these Special Snowflakes, who are trying to out-Snowflake each other. And tell Human Resources to immediately trash their resumes. The Internet is forever.

Read: U Of Maryland Promises To Protect Illegals, Special Snowflakes Meltdown »

If All You See…

…is a sea that will soon rise hundreds of feet, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Primordial Slack, with a post on the fake spin cycle of “fake news”.

Read: If All You See… »

The Classic Canadian Winter Is Totally ‘Climate Change’ Or Something

It used to be that all that cold and snow was just a part of the natural order, but, Warmists have decided that it is now caused by greenhouse gases which “trap” heat

The weather outside is frightful thanks to climate change and the polar vortex

With cold, blustering snowstorms battering the West Coast and thePrairies, you might be tempted to say “What global warming?”

But climate change may, in fact, be to blame for this oh-so-Canadian winter.

“Doesn’t global warming mean that we’re going to get warmer, shorter winters? Well, in some areas, yes, but it actually could mean we could see colder episodes,” Environment Canada senior climatologist David Phillips told CBC News.

It’s all part of a bigger puzzle that has to do with melting Arctic ice, extreme ocean temperatures, a travelling polar vortex and a weird, roller-coaster-shaped jet stream.

Read: The Classic Canadian Winter Is Totally ‘Climate Change’ Or Something »

Washington Post Wants Congress To Protect “Dreamers” From Trump

This would be a case of “fake news”, per the media’s definition, which involves scaremongering and hysteria

It’s up to Congress to protect ‘dreamers’ from deportation

WHEN THE Obama administration established a program in 2014 for “dreamers” — young undocumented immigrants brought to the United States as children by their parents — the deal was simple: They would register with the Department of Homeland Security and submit to a background check. If their records were clean and they met certain criteria, they would receive work permits and be shielded from deportation on a two-year, renewable basis.

This was another in a long set of Obama overreaches, doing something that was legally dubious, if not utterly against the Constitution. Expect that if Trump tries something in the same vein, the Washington Post Editorial Board will have a snit fit.

Since then, some 750,000 people have registered for the program, known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), and most are studying or working in this country, leading peaceable and productive lives. Yet along with feeling relief and gratitude for having been offered a reprieve, and a way out of the shadows, many feel nervous — and for good reason. Will President-elect Donald Trump, who has threatened to deport all illegal immigrants, use information they willingly gave the federal government, including addresses, to track them down and deport them?

Trump hasn’t threatened to do this specifically, hence, fake news (yes, yes, it’s on the opinion pages, but, really, there’s not a lot of daylight between the news and opinion nowadays.)

That, says Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), would be “the worst outcome.” He’s right. What possible advantage would be gained by targeting and tracking down this group of immigrants, who grew up in the United States, attended American high schools, live thoroughly American lives and in many cases have no memory of any other country?

Here’s the problem: so many of these same “Dreamers” have been demanding, Demanding!!!! that the United States give them money, schooling, free college, healthcare, and be made citizens. Not asking. Demanding. Yet, many of them are out there flying the flags of their country, particularly Mexico, and slamming the US. We don’t owe them a thing. Nothing. Zip. One would think they would be humble and conciliatory and use the word “please”.

Immigration hard-liners will regard Mr. Graham’s bill as amnesty; it is nothing of the sort. He is proposing neither citizenship nor indefinite legal status for dreamers; rather, he would simply allow them to continue leading the lives they have made for themselves in this country, to which they were brought through no fault of their own.

And, along with that, what we’ve gotten and will get are two things. First, the parents who brought them will of course have to stay, because we can’t separate the kids from the parents, even though it is acknowledged within DACA that the parents are at fault. And, of course, all the relatives have to come, too.

Second, this further incents people to come to the U.S. illegally and demand they be given amnesty (it is amnesty). Unless the bill cracks down heavily on those who would come illegally now, we’ll continue to have this problem. And, based on past performance, the bill won’t.

Mr. Trump has promised to repeal Mr. Obama’s executive actions on immigration, including the one from which dreamers have benefited. He is empowered to do so. Similarly, Congress is entitled to pass legislation that would lift the threat of deportation from a cohort of young, promising and energetic immgirants who will be a benefit to this country and its economic prospects for decades to come.

Cool. The economic prospects of taking jobs from actual American citizens. Let’s face it, if Congress does pass something legalizing DACA, the next step for liberals like the WPEB is to make sure that these people can vote. Because they’ll vote Democrat. And that’s the ultimate endpoint.

Read: Washington Post Wants Congress To Protect “Dreamers” From Trump »

Surprise: Two Teens Charged With Setting Gatlinburg Wildfire

There’s a reason for the “surprise” in the headline. We’ll get to that in a moment in this discussion where 14 people died, 175 were injured, and thousands of homes and businesses were destroyed

(CNN) Two juveniles face charges of aggravated arson in connection with a deadly Tennessee wildfire that began in late November and spread to Gatlinburg, Tennessee, according to Mark Gwyn, director of the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation.

Additional charges are being considered, 4th District Attorney General James Dunn said, including the possibility of seeking a transfer to adult criminal court.

He said the youths were from Tennessee, but not from Sevier County, where the fires started. Neither their ages nor genders were released.

The fire itself is reportedly 82% contained (NY Mag claims 64%), and over 17,000 acres have been burned. So, why the “surprise”? Remember this post from November 30th

Surprise: Climate Ghouls Blame Tennessee Fire On ‘Climate Change’

The Tennessee wildfires have killed at least three and forced over 14,000 out of their homes, destroying over 250 buildings. The cause of the blaze is unknown. Except to the Climate Ghouls, Warmists who take advantage of everything bad that happens to push their cultish beliefs

I then went on to highlight numerous articles and tweets from the Climate Ghouls who blamed/linked the fire to ‘climate change’. George Soros’ Think Progress was blaming climate change on December 1st. And there’s plenty more where that came from. Plenty. Here’s Cult of Climastrology high priest Bill McKibben

I’ve asked him if he has any response now that we know it’s arson. I’m more likely to get blocked. And we get idiocy like this

https://twitter.com/ashleyahodges/status/806640128093523972

No, arson. Spell it with me, Warmists, A R S O N. Of course, what the Climate Ghouls will say now is that the wildfires were made worse by anthropogenic climate change. Because that’s what they do. Anything for their cult.

Will any Warmists retract their insanity? Of course not.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Surprise: Two Teens Charged With Setting Gatlinburg Wildfire »

Trump Picks Scott Pruitt For EPA Head

This has made Warmists very, very upset

(NY Times) President-elect Donald J. Trump has selected Scott Pruitt, the Oklahoma attorney general and a close ally of the fossil fuel industry, to run the Environmental Protection Agency, a transition official said, signaling Mr. Trump’s determination to dismantle President Obama’s efforts to counter climate change.

I love the fossil fuels part, as if the NY Times doesn’t use vast amounts to gather the news.

Mr. Pruitt, a Republican, has been a key architect of the legal battle against Mr. Obama’s climate change policies, actions that fit with the president-elect’s comments during the campaign. Mr. Trump has criticized the established science of human-caused global warming as a hoax, vowed to “cancel” the Paris accord committing nearly every nation to taking action to fight climate change, and attacked Mr. Obama’s signature global warming policy, the Clean Power Plan, as a “war on coal.”

Mr. Pruitt, 48, who has emerged as a hero to conservative activists, is also one of a number of Republican attorneys general who have formed an alliance with some of the nation’s top energy producers to push back against the Obama regulatory agenda, a 2014 investigation by The New York Times revealed.

As Oklahoma’s top law enforcement official, Mr. Pruitt has fought environmental regulations — particularly the climate change rules. Although Mr. Obama’s rules were not completed until 2015, Mr. Pruitt was one of a handful of attorneys general, along with Greg Abbott of Texas, who began planning as early as 2014 for a coordinated legal effort to fight them. That resulted in a 28-state lawsuit against the administration’s rules. A decision on the case is pending in a federal court, but it is widely expected to advance to the Supreme Court.

Sounds like Pruitt is a great pick The thing is, Pruitt hasn’t fought against environmental regulations, he has fought against ‘climate change’ regulations. The two are not the same.

This should make for some fun hearings.

Read: Trump Picks Scott Pruitt For EPA Head »

If All You See…

…is an evil fossil fueled vehicle that No One Else should be allowed to drive, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Right Scoop, with a post on a new Democrat theory on the Electoral College.

Read: If All You See… »

Pirate's Cove