Gov. Cuomo Attempted To Silence Sheriffs Over Gun Law

Is it any wonder Conservatives worry about tyrannical government?

(Times Union) The sheriffs thought they were being summoned to the Capitol to discuss ideas for changes to New York’s gun control law, the SAFE Act. Instead, Gov. Andrew Cuomo told them to keep quiet.

In January, the New York State Sheriffs’ Association wrote Cuomo with an analysis, and later suggested tweaks.

Cuomo invited its leaders to the Capitol last month, people briefed on the meeting said. The group included Sheriffs’ Association Executive Director Peter Kehoe and Chemung County Sheriff Christopher Moss.

“We didn’t get a response (to the analysis) from him, but we could tell after the budget was passed that none of those recommendations were taken into consideration,” Moss said. “When we got there, we never got to the contents of the letter.”

Instead, Cuomo pushed the sheriffs to stop publicly speaking out against the act, Moss said.

One person briefed on the meeting said Cuomo threatened to remove sheriffs from office, a little-used power afforded the state’s chief executive under the state constitution. Moss would not confirm this. He did say the meeting was heated at times, but overall he described it as “cordial.”

Progressives are very intolerant towards Constitutionally guaranteed Free Speech and other 1st Amendment Rights.

Via Steven Goddard, who notes that something similar happened in his home state of Colorado.

Read: Gov. Cuomo Attempted To Silence Sheriffs Over Gun Law »

  AddThis Feed Button

NY Times Publishes Op-Ed Supporting The Justice Dept. Going After Reporters

Most in the press are taking a position similar to Brit Hume’s

(Mediaite) “That places this administration in the position of saying normal news gathering activities are criminal. That is chilling.”

Juan Williams, who likes to tick off both sides, said something earlier on Fox News about 20 minutes ago. Others are saying similar things. Former Obama press secretary Robert Gibbs says Team Obama needs to explain this (they won’t. Expect them to engage in their typical behavior, circling the wagons, obfuscation, denial, deflection, and casting blame. Oh, and their newest one “we don’t know”). Even Chris Matthew, Mr. Thrilling Up My Leg, has lost patience.

But not the NY Times, which publishes an op-ed by William P. Barr, Jamie “wall between law and intelligence” Gorelick, and Kenneth L. Wainstein

Stop The Leaks

FOLLOWING the disclosure that the Justice Department obtained the telephone records of Associated Press journalists, The A.P. and other news organizations have sharply criticized the action as investigative overreaching and unwarranted interference with the ability of journalists to report on government operations.

As former Justice Department officials who served in the three administrations preceding President Obama’s, we are worried that the criticism of the decision to subpoena telephone toll records of A.P. journalists in an important leak investigation sends the wrong message to the government officials who are responsible for our national security.

Oh, noes, those poor gubmint officials!!!! How are they going to do their jobs with that pesky 1st Amendment in their way. Hitler, Staling, Chavez, and many other dictators would be proud of these three nincompoops.

While we cannot know all of the facts and considerations that went into the department’s decision, we do know that prosecutors were right to try to find out who gave this damaging information to The A.P. They were right to pursue the investigation with “alternative investigative steps” for eight months first. And ultimately, they were right to take it to the next stage when they still needed more to make a case against the leaker. If the Justice Department had not done so, it would have defaulted on its obligation to protect the American people.

So, these three do not have any facts, but, hey, let’s investigate the Press, which was doing its job. Which is funny, considering that the NY Times was all for publishing serious national security information and programs when Bush was president and protecting reporters. Remember what they called “domestic wiretapping” (which wasn’t)? How about the monitoring of Islamist bank data? The White House begged the Times not to publish this program, as it would cause serious problems and endanger people. And leaking the name of a CIA interrogator. Running the stolen Wikileaks information. And many, many others. The Times loved the Abu Ghraib story, which wasn’t really secret, the DoD just hadn’t released information on what happened because they were engaged in an on-going criminal investigation. The Times found out through a leak.

It was just May 9 that another op-ed contributor, Margaret Sullivan, wrote about the danger of suppressing the leaks. Now, Gorelick et all say something different. They do have a point, that government should protect against leaks. True. But the Government should not attack the 1st Amendment and the Press because the government is incompetent. This op-ed essentially calls for trashing the 1st Amendment because government has “acted stupidly”.

More: Even Eugene Robinson, a hugely huge ObamaZombie, is upset, writing that the “Obama admin mistakes journalism for espionage”.

Read: NY Times Publishes Op-Ed Supporting The Justice Dept. Going After Reporters »

  AddThis Feed Button

Despicable Liberals Use Bodies Of Dead Children To Push “Climate Change”

It’s like clockwork: there’s some event, be it a holiday or breaking news, and Liberals use it to push one of their unhinged belief sets. If it’s bad weather they push “climate change”. Here’s disgusting and abhorent Senator Sheldon Whitehouse

(Daily Caller) “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care if we Republicans run off the climate cliff like a bunch of proverbial lemmings and disgrace ourselves? I’ll tell you why. We’re stuck in this together. We are stuck in this together. When cyclones tear up Oklahoma and hurricanes swamp Alabama and wildfires scorch Texas, you come to us, the rest of the country, for billions of dollars to recover. And the damage that your polluters and deniers are doing doesn’t just hit Oklahoma and Alabama and Texas. It hits Rhode Island with floods and storms. It hits Oregon with acidified seas, it hits Montana with dying forests. So, like it or not, we’re in this together.”

There’s no point in providing any scientific evidence that shows Whitehouse is bat guano crazy, Warmists will never believe real facts, they have a political position to push, one which gives The Government more and more power over citizens and the private sector.

Democracy Now! discusses the Oklahoma tornado by quoting several leading Warmists, Bill McKibben and Kevin Trenberth, who said tornadoes are all about “climate change”. The Fiscal Times tells us that bad weather related federal government relief costs will continue going up because of “climate change”. Disgusting Daily Show producer Lizz Winstead tries her hand at during-tornado humor, and is beaten like a rented mule.

Red, Green, And Blue says that “climate change” is giving us more and bigger tornadoes. This goes with the meme from the Huffington Post the other day when they published an article “Is Climate Change Increasing Tornado Intensity?” The actual answer was “we have no freaking clue”, because there is no scientific data to prove one way or another. Give Warmists a few more days and they’ll trot out some study to show that people driving fossil fueled vehicles are causing these.

Fortunately, many of the typical suspects are answering the HuffPo question and also saying “no”. Bill Nye, a virulent warmist, and Grist both point out that these types of natural disasters have happened before and will happen again, and that there’s not scientific proof anything is changing. Also a column at NBC.

But, there are still tons of Warmists running around on Facebook and Twitter and other social media yammering on about the link between “climate change” (they mean man-induced, to be clear) and these tornadoes. If anything, a cooler winter and spring would tend to create more and bigger tornadoes, as these are typically created by cool dry air hitting warm moist air. And this spring has been cool.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Despicable Liberals Use Bodies Of Dead Children To Push “Climate Change” »

  AddThis Feed Button

Senate Immigration Bill Requires Fingerprinting

But, it forgets one big thing as the Gang Of 8 pushes amnesty

(CBS News) Foreigners leaving the country through any of the nation’s 30 busiest airports would undergo mandatory fingerprinting under an amendment senators added Monday to a sweeping immigration bill. Lawmakers called it a step toward a more expansive biometric system that would use identifiers such as fingerprints to keep track of immigrants and visitors exiting the U.S. Currently no such system is in place, something viewed as a security weakness, particularly because some 40 percent of the 11 million immigrants in the country illegally overstayed their visas and there’s no good system for tracking them.

“This is an agreement that we need to build toward a biometric visa exit system,” said Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., who offered the amendment by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, who was absent Monday. “Implementing this biometric exit system is long overdue.”

A full-fledged biometric entry-exit system is favored by many senators but was deemed too expensive and unworkable to include in the bill. Current law already requires such a system to be in place, but the Department of Homeland Security has not implemented it. Instead the bill seeks electronic scanning of photo IDs.

Sadly, this is one of the better ideas offered by Republicans looking to strengthen the shamnesty bill. But, exactly how does it reduces illegals to print visitors when they’re exiting the country throught the 30 busiest American airports? How about we track the hell out of them when they arrive?

Read: Senate Immigration Bill Requires Fingerprinting »

  AddThis Feed Button

If All You See…

…is a horrible CO2 infused beer which will make the seas rise and cause islands to tip over, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Sentry Journal, with a post on Obama setting a terrible example.

Read: If All You See… »

  AddThis Feed Button

Democrats Introduce Hotcoldwetdry Preparedness Bill

It’s not the first time they’ve tried this: they attempted to include it in the American Clean Energy and Security Act, but it did not pass

(Noozhawk) Rep. Lois Capps, D-Santa Barbara, joined by Reps. Ed Markey of Massachusetts, Doris Matsui of California and Jan Schakowsky of Illinois, on Friday introduced legislation to improve the nation’s public health response to climate change.

The Climate Change Health Protection and Promotion Act would address the negative health effects related to climate change by supporting research, surveillance, planning, and interagency coordination to develop national plan for action.

Strange, these are all Reps who take fossil fueled flights to get to Washington.

“One of the most troubling and immediate impacts of climate change is its harmful effects on public health,” Capps said. “Regardless of what one believes about its causes, climate change is very real. The heat waves, droughts, wildfires and extreme weather events that are happening with greater frequency and intensity have a profound impact on public health that we’re only beginning to understand. We have to provide our public health officials with the tools and resources they need to effectively track and prepare for these significant public health challenges.”

We have to save you from bad weather. Only Government can Do This. It’s Good And Right And You Should Listen To Your Betters.

Capps’ legislation would help improve the public health response to the challenges posed by climate change by directing the secretary of Health and Human Services to develop a National Strategic Action Plan to assist health professionals in preparing for and responding to the public health effects of climate change.

Hmm, seems it would create more Big Government and government employees, all to tell you what to do (at the force of law). Why does it seem that every prescription is about Progressivism and erosion of liberty? All for a 1.4F increase in temps since the end of the Little Ice Age, with a miniscule 0.28F increase since 1990, 0.14F since 1997, and the reality that it was much warmer during the Global Climate Optimum, when excellent wines were grown in Britain and Vikings turned farmers in Greenland, things that could not happen with today’s temperatures.

Read: Democrats Introduce Hotcoldwetdry Preparedness Bill »

  AddThis Feed Button

Warmist Links Angelina Jolie’s Double Mastectomy To GOP Coming Around On “Climate Change”

I’d love to say this is parody, but, alas, no, this is how wackadoodle the New Climate Deniers are (via Junk Science)

Will Angelina Jolie Help End Climate-Change Denial, And Help The Republican Party?

File this one under unintended consequences. Angelina Jolie, by announcing her preventative double masectomy, will likely have significant influence well beyond women’s health. By modeling how to think with data when data do not tell us what we would otherwise want them to say, she displayed a level of decision-making courage that business and political leaders should strive to emulate. For example, her leadership just may end up helping those fighting in the Republican Party to end ongoing anti-science climate-change denial.

What do I mean by decision-making courage? Jolie started with the data, however imperfect and probabilistic scientific data are. On the basis of this data she embarked on an inconvenient (at times painful) course of action so as to significantly lower the chances of experiencing an absolutely catastrophic outcome. She choose preventive surgery to increase the chances of staying cancer-free.

There’s a hell of a difference between Jolie voluntarily deciding that, because she had the gene which significantly increased her chances to get breast cancer, she’d have a double mastectomy, all based on long term science, versus believing in something that doesn’t even start with a proper scientific term. They call it climate change instead of anthropogenic global warming for several reasons, one of which is to blame any and all happenings on mankind’s modern lifestyle, especially fossil fuels. Which the New Science Deniers refuse to give up themselves.

What would be truly courageous would be Warmists looking at the actual hard data. Looking at the history. Understanding the history of “climate change”, particularly over the past 40 years….oh, see, that’s where it breaks down, because it is not about science, it’s about Progressive policy prescriptions, bigger government, control of people and the private sector.

Also, it would be courageous if they practiced what they preached. Won’t happen.

Read: Warmist Links Angelina Jolie’s Double Mastectomy To GOP Coming Around On “Climate Change” »

  AddThis Feed Button

Obama’s Two Americas

An interesting juxtaposition from The Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza

Can Obama bridge the divide between the two Americas?

John Edwards was right. There are two Americas.

In one America, the events of the past 10 days have exposed the true colors of President Obama and his administration. From edited talking points about the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, to the secret seizure of phone records of Associated Press reporters to the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups, a single message has emerged: This is the inevitable result of government run amok.

In the other America, this is all much ado over nothing. The death of four Americans at the U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi was a tragedy, nothing more. The Justice Department acted legally. And the IRS officials who acted wrongly did so of their own accord and had absolutely no contact with President Obama or senior officials in his administration.

In Obama’s America, Liberals will do any and everything to protect him. Had these scandals come to light during a Republican presidency, there would have been teeth gnashing, wailing, and outrage from the Left. And Republicans would have been outraged as well. This isn’t solely the fault of Obama, who has created an atmosphere that allowed these scandals to occur: it goes back to the impeachment of President Clinton, where lefties did everything they could to protect him, despite being credibly accused of rape and sexual harassment, discarding their long held beliefs about feminism and treating women with respect. Oh, and that Clinton was charged with obstruction of justice, witness tampering, and lying to a federal grand jury. Out of that grew the group MoveOn, designed to attack Republicans and protect Democrats at all costs. Today it has been replaced with other groups.

You take a look at the comments at this story, and see Democrats providing cover. Another good example today is the article at Political Wire highlighting the DOJ targeting a Fox News reporter: with a GOP president, their would be outrage. With an Obama presidency, Liberals care less about this abuse of power and possible 1st Amendment violation.

To get those deals, Obama needs to find a way to speak to both Americas in a way he hasn’t done so far in his presidency. Economic stimulus and health care — the two big accomplishments of his first term — passed on partisan lines. The attempt to change gun laws in his second term failed largely on those same lines.

That’ll happen on the same day hummingbirds start hunting squirrels. Say what you will about President Bush, at least he attempted to be President of all Americans. Obama speaks and acts as President of the Democrats. He can yammer on about bridging divides, but his actions and rhetoric say different. Never before has a POTUS attacked private citizens engaged in their 1st Amendment Rights so much and so consistently. I don’t say Obama is Not My President because of his policies, but because he constantly demonizes and denigrates those who disagree with him, which means, me.

Obama’s rapid ascent up the political ladder was defined by bridging what were thought to be unbridgeable gaps. The question now is whether there is a ladder big enough to bridge the divide between our two opposing political Americas.

Um, no. Obama always worked to keep his hands clean, while his people and “outside” groups mercilessly attacked his opponents using the Chicago style. During campaigns he has always appealed to the weak minded through lofty speeches, but still went after those who wouldn’t toe his far, far left line. And this won’t change. Even though he can’t run again, the neverending campaign continues, he still attacks and demonizes, and perpetuates the atmosphere of a divided America. This is what he wants.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Obama’s Two Americas »

  AddThis Feed Button

Watcha Reading?

Well, let’s see now. I never did start on Darkest Hour (The Lockman Chronicles #3), but I will eventually read it. Instead, I went with A Line In The Sand by Justin Burgess, and excellent book about what happens if the US turns against the military, treating military members and veterans with a complete lack of respect, and a man rises to be President who guts the military. But, there is a conspiracy (won’t tell you more). It involves several characters, most especially a military member railroaded for having a gun (which are mostly illegal, especially for military members and vets). I got it when it was free, but worth it for $3.99 at Amazon.

Finished that, now on to Outside Context Problem, an interesting book in the vein of Larry Niven’s Footfall and Harry Turtledove’s Worldwar series. It’s not the greatest writing style (not that I could do better), a bit sophomoric, but the overall concept is excellent, as are the characters, the plot, and the buildup.

What’s on your radar.

Read: Watcha Reading? »

  AddThis Feed Button

Bummer: AGW May Have No Impact On Tropical Lizards

The same lizards that survived through previous cool and warm (much warmer than today) periods, as well as the last glacial period. It’s almost like they adapt to survive climatic changes or something

(Science) A new Dartmouth College study finds human-caused climate change may have little impact on many species of tropical lizards, contradicting a host of recent studies that predict their widespread extinction in a rapidly warming planet.

The findings appear in the journal Global Change Biology.

Most predictions that tropical cold-blooded animals, especially forest lizards, will be hard hit by climate change are based on global-scale measurements of environmental temperatures, which miss much of the fine-scale variation in temperature that individual animals experience on the ground, said the article’s lead author, Michael Logan, a Ph.D. student in ecology and evolutionary biology.

You mean lizards are able to survive in a range of temps? Weird.

The overall results suggest that global-scale predictions generated using low-resolution temperature data may overestimate the vulnerability of many tropical lizards to climate change.

Life on Earth is able to survive in a wide range of temps. Look at your fish tank. If the temps change a degree or two do the fish immediately die? Or, is thermometer in a wider range? I’ve had tanks for decades, from big to small. Fish do fine in a range between 68 and 82. That’s short term. In the long term, life adapts. Warmists attempt to create studies with “low-resolution variability” in order to make doom worthy prognostications. The reality of life on Earth says different.

PS: Ye Olde NY Times editorial board is whining about “climate change” and hitting CO2 at 400ppm, failing to note that it did not happen. And they really want Obama to use executive action, something they were dead set against when President Bush was in office.

And, dangnabit all, they still use fossil fueled vehicles to deliver their tree killing editions, and refuse to do away with their air conditioning.

Read: Bummer: AGW May Have No Impact On Tropical Lizards »

  AddThis Feed Button

Bad Behavior has blocked 19402 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE