Good News: Prince Charles Extends His Doom From Climate Change Prediction!

High flying, fossil fuels using, big carbon offender Prince Charles has changed his mind on when doom comes

(Washington Times) Prince Charles is warning that there are only 35 years left to save the planet from climate disaster, which represents a 33-year extension of his previous deadline.

In March 2009, the heir to the British throne predicted that the world had 100 months “before we risk catastrophic climate change,” as pointed out by Climate Depot’s Marc Morano.

“Prince Charles gives world reprieve: Extends ‘100-Month’ climate ‘tipping point’ to 35 more years,” says the Tuesday headline on the Climate Depot website.

The British blog Not A Lot of People Know That announced in a July 19 post, “Charlie Gives Us a Reprieve!

He had predicted doom by 2017.  Yet another failed prognostication from a Cult of Climastrology bigwig. Pushing it out 35 years means no one will remember the updated prognostication.

Read: Good News: Prince Charles Extends His Doom From Climate Change Prediction! »

Bill To Defund Planned Parenthood Fast-tracked In Senate

The latest undercover video regarding Planned Parenthood is even more shocking

(Life News) After two shocking videos caught Planned Parenthood doctors discussing and arranging the sale of body parts of aborted babies, a third video has been released today catching a Planned Parenthood vice president negotiating the sale of aborted babies and attempting to get as much money as possible from the deal.

Abortion supporters (how did it come to pass that a Party supports unfettered abortion, allowing no restrictions, even on late term and parental notification?) whine about the videos being “heavily edited”, even though the full videos for numbers 1 and 2 have been released. The news heavily edits all their videos. Maybe we should complain. Anyhow

(The Hill) Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is fast-tracking a bill to cut off federal funding for Planned Parenthood, after senators huddled in his office Tuesday to work out the details of a bill.

Speaking on the Senate floor, the Republican leader started the process, known as Rule 14, which allows the bill to skip over being sent to a committee and go directly to the Senate floor for a vote.

“The horrendous videos of senior executives from Planned Parenthood discussing in callous tones and shocking detail their role in a national scandal requires a congressional response,” the Republican leader said in a statement.

“This legislation would ensure taxpayer dollars for women’s health are actually spent on women’s health — not a scandal-plagued political lobbying giant.”McConnell is expected to finish the fast-track process Wednesday.

The bill itself would redirect federal funds to other women’s health organizations. The vote will take place by the end of next week. I would suspect that it would occur in a time that would allow the House to take it up. Obviously, if passed, Obama will veto it, showing just how extreme he is.

On one hand, it might be better to restrict Planned Parenthood to not using federal money for abortions. The organization does provide much, much more than just abortions, and certainly helps with actual health for low income women (or, does it?). On the other hand, there are 12 good reasons to defund PP. Here are a few

2. Planned Parenthood is an independently wealthy entity. According to its latest annual report, it has over one billion dollars in net assets.[ii] In 2014 alone, data shows that Planned Parenthood’s revenue has exceeded their expenses by over $90 million.[iii]

Looks like they can afford to operate without federal money. Wait, aren’t they a “not-for-profit” organization? They say they are.

3. Planned Parenthood is America’s largest abortion provider. One out of every four abortions in the U.S. is performed in a Planned Parenthood facility. Data shows that since 1970, Planned Parenthood has performed at least 5.3 million abortions. In 2013 alone, Planned Parenthood performed a record 357,653 abortions.[iv]

We are constantly told that PP’s abortion business is just a small fraction of what they do. Why, though, do citizens pay for other people’s abortions?

4. Planned Parenthood’s business model is centered on abortion. Former Planned Parenthood clinic director Abby Johnson has written that she was given an “abortion quota” and was even told by her superiors to double the number of abortions in order to bring in more revenue.[v] Abortion patients constitute 12 percent of Planned Parenthood clients — 332,000 of 3 million unduplicated clients in its most current report. 37 percent of all Planned Parenthood clinic income revenue is from abortion procedures, according to conservative estimates. Planned Parenthood has issued a directive instructing that all affiliates must have at least one clinic that performs abortion by 2013.[vi]

Oh, hey, I didn’t know this next one

9. Planned Parenthood does not provide mammograms and is not a significant primary care provider to women. Despite claims made by Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards and members of the media, Planned Parenthood does not provide mammograms. They are also not a significant primary care provider in general. In recent reports, Planned Parenthood acknowledges that it provided primary care only to about 19,700 of its 3 million unduplicated clients. These services have been trending downward for years, from 21,247 in 2007 to 20,235 in 2008, to today’s 19,796.[xiii]

Of that’s true, then there is no reason not to defund them. They can solicit donations from abortion on demand supporters. There are many hospitals, medical centers, and others that operate only on donations, rather than government money.

Read: Bill To Defund Planned Parenthood Fast-tracked In Senate »

LA Gang Members Take Note: You’re Banned From Using Magazines That Hold More Than 10 Bullets

The Crips, Bloods, Asian Boyz, Mongols, Surenos, Mexican Mafia, MS-13, Pirus, and so many more, you be good now! No large capacity mags for you!

L.A. City Council bans large-capacity ammunition magazines

Defying sharp warnings from gun rights groups, Los Angeles thrust itself into the national debate over gun control Tuesday, as city lawmakers voted unanimously to ban the possession of firearm magazines that hold more than 10 rounds.

Such magazines have been “the common thread” in almost all the mass shootings that have devastated the country, from Newtown to Virginia Tech to Columbine, said Juliet Leftwich, legal director for the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Backers of the plan said it was a small but meaningful step to minimize the bloodshed, by forcing attackers to at least interrupt their rampages to stop and reload.

I’m sure all the hardcore gang members will immediately change their ways and start using mags that hold no more than 10 rounds. Because gangs follow the law.

The National Rifle Assn. and other gun rights groups have threatened to sue over Los Angeles’ new rules, arguing that they violate the 2nd Amendment and are preempted by existing state law.

California law already generally bans the manufacturing of such large-capacity magazines, as well as offering them for sale or bringing them into the state. But state law does not prohibit people from possessing them, which Krekorian and others argued is a “loophole” that jeopardizes public safety.

Wait, don’t Liberals constantly tell us that laws stricter than higher level government are illegal? Oh, right, that’s only when cracking down on illegal aliens.

“People who want to defend their families don’t need a 100-round drum magazine and an automatic weapon to do it,” said Krekorian, who championed the ban at a rally Tuesday outside City Hall. But if someone wanted to do harm, Krekorian added, “imagine what a gunman on this sidewalk could do with that kind of firepower with a crowd like this.”

Ownership of a fully automatic weapon is mostly illegal. Almost no one bothers with a 100 round mag. This just goes to show that the gun-grabbers are hysterics and really do not know what they’re talking about.

The new ordinance gives Angelenos who own such magazines 60 days to remove, surrender or legally sell or transfer them after it goes into effect. Breaking the law would be a misdemeanor. Garcetti has 10 days to sign the measure, which would take effect a little more than a month later.

Oh, noes, a gang member might get a ticket and a small fine! That’ll learn them! Obviously, this will only cause problems for legal gun owners, who may be left with a gun without a usable magazine. Unless they purchased the weapon prior to January 1, 2000. Which would seem to be a violation of equal treatment under the law.

At the Tuesday hearing, the CalGuns Shooting Sports Assn. also raised concerns. “I don’t think it’s going to have any effect on gun violence,” said the association’s director, Chad Cheung, pointing out that people in neighboring cities such as Burbank or Glendale could still possess the magazines.

“Bad people are going to do bad things, and they’ll do it regardless of whatever laws are in place,” Cheung said.

The problem with all these gun laws are that they go after the legal owners, not those who illegally own them and use them for nefarious purposes.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: LA Gang Members Take Note: You’re Banned From Using Magazines That Hold More Than 10 Bullets »

Bummer: 4 In 10 Have Never Heard Of Climate Change

25+ years of “spreading awareness” and this is what we get

Climate change may be headline news in the United States but it still is barely registering in many parts of the world.

A new study on Monday in Nature Climate Change finds that 40 percent of adults worldwide aren’t aware of global warming. Using data from the 2007-2008 Gallup World Poll, conducted in 119 countries, the researchers found that the proportion of people who have never heard of global warming rises to 65 percent in developing countries like Egypt, Bangladesh and, even big greenhouse emitters, like India.

“This is after decades of scientific research, decades of media coverage, decades of international negotiations and it’s an issue on the agenda at big, geopolitic meetings,” he said.

They say this equates to about 2 billion people. So, big fail.

In all fairness, the study data isn’t exactly current, but it’s doubtful the needle has moved much. And, surely, the first thing that these new people ask is “OK, so, does that mean that everyone who believes in Hotcoldwetdry has given up their own use of fossil fuels and made their lives carbon neutral, as they now want me to do? What? They havent? Oh, they just want me to pay more taxes and restrict my use of AC, heating, energy, and cars, while restricting my life? Huh. “

The sense of urgency increases when people understand that climate change is manmade. But other factors also play into that, including local temperature changes in parts of Asia and Africa, support for government mitigation efforts in the United States and, in China, concern rises with worsening air pollution.

Of course, in reality, there’s very little anthropogenic about it, no matter how many times Warmists say it. If it was, might they not change their own behavior and act like it’s a crisis?

Read: Bummer: 4 In 10 Have Never Heard Of Climate Change »

If All You See…

…is a world being turned into a desert from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Last Tradition, with a post on the Boy Scouts foolishly ending the ban on LGBT leaders.

Read: If All You See… »

CNN Poll Finds 52% Want Iran Deal Defeated

Obviously, CNN tries to spin away the results that aren’t supporting The Precious

A majority of Americans want Congress to reject the recently-negotiated nuclear deal with Iran, even as President Barack Obama’s approval rating continues to stand in net-positive territory for the second month in a row, according to a new CNN/ORC poll.

The new CNN/ORC poll finds 49% approve of the way Obama is handling his job, 47% disapprove, about the same as in a June survey, which found the President’s approval rating at 50% for the first time since 2013. But on the President’s biggest accomplishment since then — the nuclear agreement reached between the U.S., its allies and Iran — most say they would like to see Congress reject it. Overall, 52% say Congress should reject the deal, 44% say it should be approved.

Some opposition to the deal may be fueled by skepticism. A CNN/ORC poll in late June, conducted as the deal was being worked out, found that nearly two-thirds of adults thought it was unlikely the negotiations would result in an agreement that would prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

Some support of the deal may be fueled by Lefties wanting to support The Precious over the security of the United States.

The new poll finds a sharp partisan gap on whether Congress should approve the deal, with 66% of Republicans and 55% of independents saying Congress ought to reject it and 61% of Democrats saying it should be approved. Younger adults, who tend to lean more Democratic, are more apt to favor the deal: 53% of those age 18-34 say approve it, while 56% of those age 35 or older say reject it. There is also an education divide on the deal, with 53% of college graduates saying the deal should be approved, while just 37% of those with a high school degree or less formal education saying they think it should be approved.

So, the takeaway is that those who have more experience, more world knowledge, know better, and think the deal should be scuttled.

Read: CNN Poll Finds 52% Want Iran Deal Defeated »

James Hansen: We’re Totally Living In The Doomy “Hyper-Anthropocene Age” Or Something

If anthropogenic climate change was so utterly real, so dangerous, and the science was so utterly sound, one would think that there would be no need for hyperbolic, over-the-top stories and pronouncements, eh? Here’s hyper-alarmist Joe Romm at Climate Progress

James Hansen Spells Out Climate Danger Of The ‘Hyper-Anthropocene’ Age

James Hansen and 16 leading climate experts have written a must-read discussion paper on what humanity risks if it can’t keep total global warming below 2°C (3.6°F). The greatest risk they identify is “that multi-meter sea level rise would become practically unavoidable.”

This is warning everyone should heed — not just because Hansen’s co-authors include some of the world’s top sea-level rise experts, such as Eric Rignot and Isabella Velicogna, but also given Hansen’s prescience on climate change dating back more than three decades.

In 1981, Hansen led a team of NASA scientists in a seminal article in Science, “Climate Impact of Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide.”

They warned: “Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage.”

Wow. A 35-year-old peer-reviewed climate warning that is 100 percent dead on. Is there anyone else on the planet who can has been right for so long about climate change?

Except, the “fabled Northwest Passage” is not open. Yes, it opened for a brief time, very brief, but, interestingly, it was also open during the “safe” time when CO2 was well below 350ppm, back between 1903-1906. Every prognostication of an ice free Arctic has failed.

Predicting drought? There are always parts of the world, including North America and Asia, that experience drought. Most non-alarmist scientists have noted that the West Antarctic melting is primarily occurring due to thermal heat underneath from volcanic activity.

Hansen has a long history of failed prognostications. His 1988 forecast was off by 150%. Manhattan is not under water. And so many more.

Hansen and co-authors deftly dismiss those ill-informed Pollyannas who use Orwellian terms like “good Anthropocene.” They explain that we are far past “the era in which humans have contributed to global climate change,” which probably began a thousand years ago, and are now in “a fundamentally different phase, a Hyper-Anthropocene … initiated by explosive 20th century growth of fossil fuel use.”

The “Hyper-Anthropocene” is a very good term to describe the unprecedented acceleration in global warming that humanity has set in motion with the explosive growth of fossil fuels and carbon pollution, as the recent science makes clear:

The Hyper-Anthropocene”!!!!!!!! Which has seen Mankind reach highs our ancestors never dreamed of. But, hey, you know, doom

The fact that 2°C total warming locks us in to sea level rise of 10 feet or more has been obvious for a while now. Heck, the National Science Foundation (NSF) issued a news release back in March 2012 on paleoclimate research with the large-type headline, “Global Sea Level Likely to Rise as Much as 70 Feet in Future Generations.” The lead author of that study explained, “The natural state of the Earth with present carbon dioxide levels is one with sea levels about 70 feet higher than now.”

Yeah, this is about the 10 feet of sea rise very very soon paper, not peer reviewed, and may never be, because his compatriots are not enthused by the paper. But, “climate science”needs lots of scary stories about future doom. It’s how they roll. Because the so-called science itself continues to fail spectacularly.

Meanwhile, James Hansen and the rest of the Cult of Climastrology refuse to give up their own use of fossil fuels. Weird, right?

Read: James Hansen: We’re Totally Living In The Doomy “Hyper-Anthropocene Age” Or Something »

Daily Beast Dredges Up Decades Old Divorce Rape Accusation Against Trump

Much like The Other McCain, I’m going to start out by saying I’m not a fan of The Donald, at least in terms of being the Republican presidential nominee. Heck, even running as a Republican. He may hold a few Republican positions, but he also holds, many, many Democrat positions, some that are way, way to the left. He’s the very definition of a RINO (Republican in name only). But, he’s leading in the polls (sigh), so Progressives have their knives out, as published at the Daily Beast by Tim Mak and Brandy Zadrozny

Ex-Wife: Donald Trump Made Me Feel ‘Violated’ During Sex
Ivana Trump once accused the real estate tycoon of ‘rape,’ although she later clarified: not in the ‘criminal sense.’

Donald Trump introduced his presidential campaign to the world with a slur against Mexican immigrants, accusing them of being “rapists” and bringing crime into the country.

“I mean somebody’s doing it!…Who’s doing the raping?” Donald Trump said, when asked to defend his characterization.

It was an unfortunate turn of phrase for Trump—in more ways than one. Not only does the current frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination have a history of controversial remarks about sexual assault, but as it turns out, his ex-wife Ivana Trump once used “rape” to describe an incident between them in 1989. She later said she felt “violated” by the experience.

I’m not going to defend Trump, but, I am going to wonder when the Daily Beast will run a story about Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton’s husband, William J. Clinton, and the women who have credibly accused him of rape and sexual assault. The media is all over Bill Cosby supposedly raping and sexually assaulting lots of women in previous decades, and have found him guilty. Yet, the same media covers for Bill Clinton, and the wife who apparently looked away.

(UK Daily Mail) A woman who has claimed she was sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton during his presidency in 1993 is going after his wife with a website chronicling ‘a scandal a day’ – and she’s looking for more sex-harassment victims.

Kathleen Willey testified in a lawsuit brought by Paula Jones against the former president that he groped her and kissed her in a small room near the Oval Office. The Clintons and their lawyers disputed that claim.

But now Willey says Hillary Clinton is ‘the most corrupt human being, the most corrupt politician that this nation has ever seen, man or woman.’

She’s working overtime to remind Americans – and to teach young voters who weren’t yet born in 1993 – of her husband’s reputation as a legendary lothario.

Willey told radio host Aaron Klein on Sunday that ‘in light of what’s happened with Bill Cosby,’ she plans to use her website to search for more women who might make sex-harassment claims against the former president.

‘If you or any one you know has been harassed, sexually harassed, assaulted or intimidated by Bill Clinton, please send your name and email address and you can be assured that your anonymity will be ensured … and we will make sure that you are safe,’ she said the language will read.

Rape and sexual assault activists have been saying that rape and sexual assault are never, ever, OK. And they’re right. They’ve deemed even little boys kissing little girls as sexual assault. Little boys have even been suspended from school. So, why do these same Lefties ignore Bill Clinton’s record, and how Hillary stood by her man, enabling his activities?

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Daily Beast Dredges Up Decades Old Divorce Rape Accusation Against Trump »

Unruly #BlackLivesMatter Crowd Gets A Taste Of Pepper Spray

This is like totally super horrible because a white cop (isn’t 5hat inappropriate profiling?) Pepper sprayed Blacks

(UK Guardian) A transit police officer has pepper-sprayed a crowd in Cleveland protesting the arrest of a 14-year-old at a Black Lives Matter conference inspired by police brutality.

The incident occurred near Cleveland State University in the city’s downtown where the first Black Lives Matter conference was taking place. More than 1,200 participants spent the weekend organizing and discussing a range of social justice issues.

According to the Greater Cleveland regional transit authority, its officers were taking an intoxicated teenage bus rider to a police station just as the conference was ending about 5pm. A large crowd blocked the squad car and tried to get the youngster out. One of the officers turned and began pepper-spraying the crowd.

 photo simpsons_nelson_haha-1_zpsdt9pbbcm.jpg

The police were trying to help a drunk 14 year old, and the #BlackLivesMatter Crowd impeded official government business. What if the kid had a serious medical emergency? They got what they asked for.

Read: Unruly #BlackLivesMatter Crowd Gets A Taste Of Pepper Spray »

Brain Eating Omeba Invading North Totes Due To Climate Change!

I blame people like Al Gore and Barack Obama for taking tons of fossil fueled travel

Fatal Brain Eating Amoeba Now Invading Northern US, Courtesy Climate Change

Global warming is pushing a dangerous brain eating amoeba north into the US, experts warn.

The recent death of a Minnesota teen has sparked debate whether warmer summers are facilitating survival of amoeba Naegleria fowleri in northern lakes and water holes. According to US News and World Report which quoted Dr Bruce Hirsch of North Shore University Hospital, NY, the ameba prefers warmer waters of the south but climate change is providing just that in northern regions which do not have a record of its presence until recent past.

Though dangerous, Naegleria fowleri infections are rare. There have only been 133 recorded cases of infections in the past five decades. Health officials recommend avoiding nasal rinsing and preventing water in untreated pools from entering the nose. Natural water bodies too are known to host the ameba.

Huh. Warmists are super worried about a few infections, yet, not concerned about the ever rising threat from radical Islam. But, hey, “climate change”!!!!!!!!

Read: Brain Eating Omeba Invading North Totes Due To Climate Change! »

Bad Behavior has blocked 4812 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Optimization WordPress Plugins & Solutions by W3 EDGE