Shocking News: $4 Billion In “Green” Booty Flowed To Obama Donors

The Washington Post’s Carol D. Leonnig and Joe Stephens, along with a few editors, are probably soon to receive a screaming, profanity laced tirade from the White House for this story

(WP) …. During the next three years, the department provided $2.4 billion in public funding to clean-energy companies in which Wagle’s former firm, Vantage Point Venture Partners, had invested, a Washington Post analysis found. Overall, the Post found that $3.9 billion in federal grants and financing flowed to 21 companies backed by firms with connections to five Obama administration staffers and advisers.

Obama’s program to invest federal funds in start-up companies — and the failure of some of those companies — is becoming a rallying cry for opponents in the presidential race. Mitt Romney has promised to focus on Obama’s “record” as a “venture capitalist.” And in ads and speeches, conservative groups and the Republican candidates are zeroing in on the administration’s decision to extend $535 million to the now-shuttered solar firm Solyndra and billions of dollars more to clean-tech start-ups backed by the president’s political allies.

Consider, that’s just the amount “with connections….”: that’s certainly not the total amount that we can assume went to companies that include people who were big donors. We recently learned that yet another solar company, Genesis, is going bust, after soaking the taxpayers with an $825 million loan guarantee.

Read: Shocking News: $4 Billion In “Green” Booty Flowed To Obama Donors »

  AddThis Feed Button

Bummer: Sierra Nevada Snow Consistent With Past 130 Years

I’m sure this will be waved away as an “anomaly”, or perhaps we’ll hear that the study authors are in the pay of Big Oil or something

(SF Gate) Snowfall in the Sierra Nevada has remained consistent for 130 years, with no evidence that anything has changed as a result of climate change, according to a study released Tuesday.

The analysis of snowfall data in the Sierra going back to 1878 found no more or less snow overall – a result that, on the surface, appears to contradict aspects of recent climate change models.

John Christy, the Alabama state climatologist who authored the study, said the amount of snow in the mountains has not decreased in the past 50 years, a period when greenhouse gases were supposed to have increased the effects of global warming.

The heaping piles of snow that fell in the Sierra last winter and the paltry amounts this year fall within the realm of normal weather variability, he concluded.

“The dramatic claims about snow disappearing in the Sierra just are not verified,” said Christy, a climate change skeptic and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. “It looks like you’re going to have snow for the foreseeable future.”

Interesting that they used the word “skeptic”. I don’t recall alarmists being called “alarmists” or “True Believers”, do you?

Anyhow, the Warmists end the story stating that this is entirely compatible with their conjectures, that it won’t get warm everywhere due to um, global warming.

Read: Bummer: Sierra Nevada Snow Consistent With Past 130 Years »

  AddThis Feed Button

If All You See…

…is drought turning everything to sand, you might just be a Warmist

Read: If All You See… »

  AddThis Feed Button

Kids Won’t Know What Shipping On The Danube Looks Like

Poor little kids

At least four Balkan nations suspended shipping on the Danube today (Feb. 14) because of heavy ice on the river, according to news reports.

They also won’t know what the Jammu-Srinagar Highway looks like.

Read: Kids Won’t Know What Shipping On The Danube Looks Like »

  AddThis Feed Button

Rep. Issa Close To Finding Holder In Contempt Of Congress

Now, that would be a hell of a thing, the top “law enforcement” agent in the country slapped with a contempt charge

(Daily Caller) On Tuesday Rep. Darrell Issa, chairman of the House committee on Oversight and Government Reform, took a major step toward holding Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress for his failure to provide subpoenaed documents and other information about Operation Fast and Furious.

In a Jan. 31 letter, Issa had threatened Holder with such a move if he failed to provide all the subpoenaed documents relating to the Fast and Furious gunwalking scandal by Feb. 9. That deadline has come and gone, and Holder’s Department of Justice still hasn’t provided most of those documents. Issa’s subpoena dates back to Oct. 12, 2011.

On Tuesday in a seven-page letter, Issa revealed that Deputy Attorney General James Cole begged Congress to extend the Feb. 9 deadline. Issa wrote that the request was “ironic” and “ignores the reality that the Department has unreasonably delayed producing these documents to the Committee.”

“On its face, the requested extension demonstrates a lack of good faith,” Issa wrote to Holder. “With one exception, the Department has only produced documents responsive to the subpoena on the eve of congressional hearings in which senior Department officials testified. The Department appears to be more concerned with protecting its image through spin control than actually cooperating with Congress.”

That last paragraph is the way the letter starts. In the letter, Issa has multiple questions for Holder, including

  • Exactly how and when did senior Department officials learn the truth of what happened?
  • Did Department officials retaliate against whistleblowers?

Issa also demands early in the letter, because “we cannot wait any longer for the Department’s cooperation”  that Holder “specify a date by which you expect the Department to produce all documents responsive to the subpoena.” The bold and underline was not mine, but Issa’s.

The letter ends thusly

It is impossible to end our investigation with the current level of cooperation we are receiving from the Department. Rather, the Committee requires the full cooperation of the Department Of Justice. This is not an “election year political ‘gotcha’ game,” but rather a bipartisan sentiment. As Ranking Member [Elijah] Cummings (D-MD) promised the family of slain Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry, “we will not rest until every single person responsible for all of this, no matter where they are, are brought to justice.” I applaud his revolve, and I want to make it clear that Congress will not give up until this accountability has been achieved. (note: bold is Issa’s)

It’s time to hold Holder in contempt, and get to the truth of what would be a major scandal had this operation occurred under Bush or a Republican president.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Rep. Issa Close To Finding Holder In Contempt Of Congress »

  AddThis Feed Button

Congress Reaches Tentative Deal On “Temporary” Payroll Tax Extension

Of course, many in the media and the Democrat Party (but, I repeat myself) are portraying this as Republicans caving. Pretty much because this is about the only thing that Obama has done that is actually popular, to a degree. Why removing money from the Social Security fund is popular, I’m not sure

(Washington Post) Congressional negotiators reached a tentative deal Tuesday to extend a payroll tax holiday, unemployment benefits and Medicare payment rates for doctors, while finding more than $50 billion in cuts to reduce the effect on the federal deficit.

While President Obama and congressional leaders publicly jousted over the negotiations, senior Democrats and Republicans worked behind the scenes toward a compromise that would extend the tax and unemployment benefits through the year. A deal also would mean that doctors would not see a drop in rates paid by Medicare, according to senior aides in both parties.

Aha! Republicans are helping the Medicare system from the Democrats past legislation that reduced doctor reimbursements, which saw doctors refusing to take on more Medicare patients

Obama was alluding to a payroll tax debate in December, when Senate leaders forged a bipartisan agreement on a two-month extension only to have House GOP leaders balk at the plan. His aides have said this package probably is the last major piece of legislation that the West Wing would focus on until the November elections.

If I’m reading this correctly, the White House is saying that they just dumped their own budget on Congress, and aren’t going to bother with it for the rest of the year. Way to abdicate leadership and Constitutional responsibility, guys and gals!

The tax holiday, which is set to expire at the end of this month, saves the average worker more than $80 a month. Budget officials estimated that an additional 10-month extension would cost the Treasury about $100 billion.

In Washington, $100 billion is chump change, and means $100 billion will have to be financed through China to pay out Social Security benefits. I can understand why a bare majority of 54% favor the cut: most of them are unlikely to actually see benefits when they retire, as the system is pretty close to being insolvent. However, if Obama thinks he can pander to young folks, he can think again: only 48% support, 45% against, in the 18-34 age group. They typically have lower salaries, and see less benefit from this tax.

But, Obama cautioned, “you can’t take anything for granted here in Washington until my signature is actually on it,” and he encouraged Americans to lobby their representatives in Congress to approve the measure “without drama, without delay.”

“Let’s keep making sure the American people’s voices are breaking through until it’s finally, absolutely done,” he said.

He wasn’t too keen on listening to the American people’s voices when it came to (no)Stimulus and ObamaCare. And, interestingly, as the Hill delves into the CNN poll cited above

Democrats are evenly split on the issue, with 48 percent favoring a tax cut and 49 percent opposing. Nearly six in 10 Republicans support reducing the payroll tax, while 38 percent do not believe in doing so.

Wait, most Dems do not want the tax cut? Someone tell Obama. Someone should also tell him that support for the cut has dropped from a high of 65% in September. Probably because people understand what this cut actually does.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Congress Reaches Tentative Deal On “Temporary” Payroll Tax Extension »

  AddThis Feed Button

Globull Warming “May” Cause 100 Year Storms Every 3 Years

Of course, this is positioned as being caused by “climate change”, because the climate had always been static and predictable prior to 1980

(Treehugger) When Hurricane Irene made landfall along the Eastern seaboard last summer, crippling dozens of communities with record flooding, many folks called the storm a ’100-year event’ — but a new study suggests that it will be much sooner than century until we see the next one.

A team of scientists from MIT and Princeton University utilized hurricane simulators to determine with what frequency powerful storms could lead to flooding under a variety of climate model projections, and what they found makes all previous usage of the term ‘storm of the century’ mere hyperbole. According to researchers, climate change’s effects on weather systems might mean storms like Hurricane Irene, once considered rare, occur every 3 to 20 years.

You mean that little storm that wasn’t really a hurricane, and had a top wind speed of 9mph in Central Park? The first supposed hurricane to hit the continental United States in 3 years? Of course, that is not to diminish the large amounts of rain it dumped. But, it “may” mean dooooooom! Perhaps. Maybe. Might. I’d be more impressed if they would predict what would happen over the next 5 years. Certainly, with all their computer programs, they could do that, instead of decades in the future

From MIT News Office:

To simulate present and future storm activity in the region, the researchers combined four climate models with a specific hurricane model. The combined models generated 45,000 synthetic storms within a 200-kilometer radius of Battery Park, at the southern tip of Manhattan.

They studied each climate model under two scenarios: a “current climate” condition representing 1981 to 2000 and a “future climate” condition reflecting the years 2081 to 2100, a prediction based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s projections of future moderate carbon dioxide output. While there was some variability among the models, the team generally found that the frequency of intense storms would increase due to climate change.

So, they’re using discredited and unscientific computer models which can only be used to predict the past, but have failed spectacularly to predict the future, as their basis? Garbage in garbage out. Except, IPCC models often fail to predict the past. This is all so similar to going to see a psychic.

Read: Globull Warming “May” Cause 100 Year Storms Every 3 Years »

  AddThis Feed Button

If All You See…

…is evil beer releasing CO2, you might just be a Warmist

Read: If All You See… »

  AddThis Feed Button

Kids Won’t Know What Montenegro Looks Like

Won’t someone think of the kids?

(CBS News) The heaviest snowfall in Montenegro in 63 years has sealed off hundreds of villages, shutting down roads and railways and closing the main airport in the tiny Balkan state on Saturday.

The government has said it is considering introducing a state of emergency throughout the country.

The snow virtually sealed off the capital Podgorica, closing its airport and hampering rail and road traffic. At 52 centimeters (20 inches) high, it was the worst fall in the capital since 1949.

They also won’t know what un-damaged historic sites in Italy look like.

Read: Kids Won’t Know What Montenegro Looks Like »

  AddThis Feed Button

Media Matters Looked To Destroy Fox News Employees Personally

The Daily Caller continues its expose on far left Soros monkeys Media Matters For Amerika, and in part 2 we learn stuff that pretty much won’t shock anyone

(Daily Caller) A little after 1 p.m. on Sept. 29, 2009, Karl Frisch emailed a memo to his bosses, Media Matters for America founder David Brock and president Eric Burns. In the first few lines, Frisch explained why Media Matters should launch a “Fox Fund” whose mission would be to attack the Fox News Channel.

“Simply put,” Frisch wrote, “the progressive movement is in need of an enemy. George W. Bush is gone. We really don’t have John McCain to kick around any more. Filling the lack of leadership on the right, Fox News has emerged as the central enemy and antagonist of the Obama administration, our Congressional majorities and the progressive movement as a whole.”

“We must take Fox News head-on in a well funded, presidential-style campaign to discredit and embarrass the network, making it illegitimate in the eyes of news consumers.”

What Frisch proceeded to suggest, however, went well beyond what legitimate presidential campaigns attempt. “We should hire private investigators to look into the personal lives of Fox News anchors, hosts, reporters, prominent contributors, senior network and corporate staff,” he wrote.

After that, Frisch argued, should come the legal assault: “We should look into contracting with a major law firm to study any available legal actions that can be taken against Fox News, from a class action law suit to defamation claims for those wronged by the network. I imagine this would be difficult but the right law firm is bound to find some legal ground for us to take action against the network.”

Those on the Left have always despised Fox because they refuse to walk the same far left line as the other 99% of the media. They really do not like Americans being offered an alternative viewpoint, nor seeing actual Conservatives on TV destroying the liberals they debate with. They do not want to see people like Hannity, Beck (obviously, he has moved on), Ingraham, O’Reilly, et all, expounding Conservative views. So, instead of telling us why the Leftist point of view is better for America, Media Matters is intent on destroying the people who work for Fox in a personal manner.

This revelation isn’t particularly new: David Brock has as much as said he is out to destroy Fox News last year, which puts their tax exempt status in jeopardy. The above mentioned memo itself highlights that MMFA has violated their 501(c)3 status, which prohibits MMFA from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. Why do they want a tax exempt status anyway? If memory serves, Liberals think everyone should pay their “fair share” in taxes. They should walk the talk.

Read: Media Matters Looked To Destroy Fox News Employees Personally »

  AddThis Feed Button

Bad Behavior has blocked 5204 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE