…is a forest that shall soon die from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Victory Girls Blog, with a post on the American Biased Broadcasting Company.
Read: If All You See… »
…is a forest that shall soon die from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Victory Girls Blog, with a post on the American Biased Broadcasting Company.
Read: If All You See… »
If you’ve enjoyed the special emoticons for the comments, well, you won’t be seeing anything other than the base ones you see right now. The plugin, called WP-Monalisa, will not allow for the uploading of the extra ones I added in, and believe me, I’ve tried. I can’t even deleted the plugin. Maybe things will change during the next update.
More: This update to WordPress has allowed the older quicktags (bold, link, italic, etc) to start working again. Only real big difference is allowing strikeouts, and the ability to use other HTML code to do things like changing the color of the font and such.
It’s these kinds of unhinged screeds that make it hard to take the Cult of Climastrology seriously
NOAA just confirmed the last 400 months were all warmer-than-average global temperatures…
For 400 months in a row, our planet has been unusually hot
Our overheating planet just reached another staggering — maybe even astronomical — new milestone.In a report out Thursday, NOAA confirmed that April was the 400th consecutive month of warmer-than-average global temperatures. The last month cooler than the 20th century average was December 1984, back in the days of big hair and Michael Jackson’s “Thriller.â€
We’ve come a long way since then. Somehow, though, we’re still debating whether human activity is behind the warmer atmosphere, not to mention what the hell we’re going to do about it.
Either the last 400 months were all an incredible coincidence — we’ll get to that in a second — or something else is going on. I’m thinking it’s the latter.
I’ve rather ignored the pointless silliness on 400 months, something most Skeptics have ignored, a claim involving 33.33 years. It’s a silly argument, and utterly made up. Especially when the same people who are making these prognostications are the ones controlling the data. And you have articles that blow this talking point away, like
Of course, Warmists will say “but, this is just the U.S.!!!!! If we look at temps around the world, it means melting!”
Many places around the world had below average winters. And cooler than normal summers. And not in just 2018. So, there is, statistically, no way that ever single one of those 400 months were above the average, even when said average is typically from 1961 to 1990, a period of cooling (61-78) and warming (79-90). And, even so, we’re only talking about tenths and hundreds of a degree.
And, still no proof of anthropogenic causation.
Read: A Friendly Reminder That The Planet Is Melting Or Something »
…is a sea that will soon rise hundreds of feet, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Last Tradition, with a post on the sham Starbucks training day.
Read: If All You See… »
Personally, it’s a tough choice between allowing scientists with agenda muck with the data, manufacture data, spin data, and so forth, or not pushing members of the Cult of Climastrology to practice what they preach from the top down. The Sydney Morning Herald’s Ross Gittins has a different idea
The biggest mistake we’ve made on climate change
…..
The biggest mistake we’ve made is to allow our politicians to turn concern about global warming into a party-political issue, and do so merely for their own short-term advantage.
The initial motives may have been short term, but the adverse effects have been lasting. These days, for a Liberal voter to worry about climate change is to be disloyal to their party and give comfort to the enemy.
Apparently, only socialists think their grandkids will have anything to worry about. The right-thinkers among us know the only bad thing our offspring will inherit is Labor’s debt.
Global warming used not to be, shouldn’t be and doesn’t have to stay a right-versus-left issue. In Europe it’s bipartisan. Margaret Thatcher was a vocal fighter for action on climate change, and the Conservative Party is anti-denial to this day.
See, politicizing it is bad, so, hey, let’s politicize it! Thatcher may have originally been a anthropogenic climate change believer, but, as evidence came out, she became a skeptic. Funny how Ross forgets to mention that, eh? Why? Because that wouldn’t fit the Narrative.
Further, Gittins seems to be placing most of the blame on Skeptics, rather than people on the political left (who are really on the right of the political scale, in the Authoritarian models, like Fascism. In theory, Socialism and Communism are to the left, because of the limited roles of government. In practice, way to the right, bigger and strong and more centralized government) who hijacked what might have been actual science to use it to push their hardcore government control policies. This especially happened with the fall of the Soviet Union, and so many of the Commies and Commie lovers invaded and hijacked the environmental movement and started using anthropogenic global warming as their base platform.
And this has been political ever since, so you get things like this
We must take on science-deniers who insist climate change doesn’t exist. Even those in the White House. https://t.co/kTBKhKB1f8
— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) May 28, 2018
What does she mean by “take on”? So many of her Warmist comrades mean silence, jail, and even murder Skeptics. Does she feel that way? Crazy Uncle Bernie had an official policy during his run for president of “bringing climate deniers to justice.” So, even going well beyond Kamala’s threat of infringing on 1st Amendment rights.
Making the issue political was never a bug: it was a feature.
Read: Say, What’s The Biggest Mistake We’ve Made On ‘Climate Change’ (scam) »
No. One of the things leftists have been going hog wild over the past few days in regards to illegal immigration (also on kids in cages and prison bus for toddlers, both of which happened under Obama, but they still tried to Blame Trump) is Trump losing 1,500 illegal alien kids, which Is The Worst Thing Ever!!!!!!. In Liberal World, it’s 20 times worse than something like running over 2,500 guns, losing them, and having them be implicated in the shootings up to death of Mexicans, Mexican kids, and US Border Patrol agents. Surprisingly, the NY Times actually pours cold water on this (but, Monday was a holiday, so an actual reporter, probably an intern, did Journalism)
Did the Trump Administration Separate Immigrant Children From Parents and Lose Them?
President Trump over the weekend falsely blamed Democrats for a “horrible law†separating immigrant children from their parents. In fact, his own administration had just announced this policy earlier this month.
His comments followed days of growing alarm that federal authorities have lost track of more than 1,000 immigrant children, mostly from Central America, giving rise to hashtags like #WhereAreTheChildren and claims that children are being ripped from their parents’ arms at the border and then being lost.
But the president is not the only one spreading wrong information. Across social media, there have been confusing reports of what happened to these immigrant children. Here are some answers.
Did the Trump administration separate nearly 1,500 immigrant children from their parents at the border, and then lose track of them?
No. The government did realize last year that it lost track of 1,475 migrant children it had placed with sponsors in the United States, according to testimony before a Senate subcommittee last month. But those children had arrived alone at the Southwest border — without their parents. Most of them are from Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala, and were fleeing drug cartels, gang violence and domestic abuse, according to government data.
So, not ripping them from their mother’s breast and placing them with utter strangers and stuff? Huh.
Officials at the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees refugee resettlement, began making calls last year to determine what had happened to 7,635 children the government had helped place between last October and the end of the year.
From these calls, officials learned that 6,075 children remained with their sponsors. Twenty-eight had run away, five had been removed from the United States and 52 had relocated to live with a nonsponsor. The rest were unaccounted for, giving rise to the 1,475 number. It is possible that some of the adult sponsors simply chose not to respond to the agency.
Surprise! People not responding to calls. Weird, eh? How many calls do you blow off? One has to wonder how many were just bad numbers.
But, wait, it gets better
Losing track of children who arrive at the border alone is not a new phenomenon. A 2016 inspector general report showed that the federal government was able to reach only 84 percent of children it had placed, leaving 4,159 unaccounted for.
So this happened under Obama, and there was no freakout from the Credentialed Media nor Democrats. Anyhow
https://twitter.com/MaxMisal/status/1001228704457125888
Fancy THAT! This puts the Left's selective outrage over immigrants in DAMNING perspective https://t.co/ZRj7aswKzz
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) May 28, 2018
That’s a good thread to read.
Read: Say, Did The Trump Admin Really Lose A Bunch Of Illegal Alien Kids? »