If All You See…

…are carbon pollution linked clouds making flying more turbulent, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Victory Girls Blog, with a post on the dumbest meme on the Internet.

Read: If All You See… »

We Should Abolish ‘Climate Change’, Not Adapt To It Or Something

People who use lots of fossil fuels tell us that we should make them more expensive and install a government Ponzi scheme. Here’s Judy Hindley of the Citizens Climate Lobby UK in the nutty UK Guardian

Stop climate change, don’t ‘adapt’ to it

While I appreciate your work in keeping the spotlight on the global heatwave (World on fire: the rise of the 50C city, G2, 13 August), I’m scared by the emphasis of your correspondents and leader writers on “adapting” to climate change (Letters, 11 July). You don’t “adapt” to a raging fire, do you? You have to stop it. And the first thing you need to do is stop pouring fuel on it.

Leading scientists worldwide now agree that the main cause of the climate crisis is the burning of fossil fuels, and leading economists agree that the solution is to price fossil fuels out of the market. Until that happens, we will be paying – with our health, our lives and our children’s future.

Why don’t we hear more about this? Two main reasons, perhaps: our economy is largely run on fossil fuels, and those on low incomes suffer most from higher energy prices. Yet there’s a solution.

And that solution?

It’s over six years since the leading scientist Dr James Hansen – in a historic TED talk on climate change, which laid out how his warnings had been suppressed in his 30-year tenure as director of Nasa’s Goddard Institute – memorably declared that “the greatest tragedy is that it would be so easy to stop it”.

What is needed, he said, is a substantial, rising fee on fossil fuels, imposed at the source (oil well, coal pit, port of entry) – with the revenue not kept by the government but returned to every citizen in equal shares.

This would not only ease the transition for those on low incomes but promote every kind of green behaviour, as well as incentivising the development and deployment of alternative energy sources. It’s an elegant solution – easy to implement, transparent in its operation, immediate in its effect, and fair.

See? It’s so easy. Tax the hell out of fossil fuels companies, and then the government will magnanimously give money to low income people who’ve seen their cost of living skyrocket, making them even more dependent on government. And if you’re dependent on government, they own you. And can force you to engage in said “green behavior.”

https://twitter.com/WilliamTeach/status/1029707197742309376

Now, if only all these Warmists would give up their own use of fossil fuels.

Read: We Should Abolish ‘Climate Change’, Not Adapt To It Or Something »

Credentialed Media Seems Rather Upset That Criminal “Immigrant” Was Deported To El Salvador

Look at this headline: do you get the idea that NJ.com is attempting to scapegoat Immigration and Customs Enforcement for being mean and deporting “immigrants”?

This immigrant was arrested multiple times. Now ICE has sent him back to El Salvador.

No telling if writer Kelly Heyboer wrote the headline or someone else did. Let’s see what she did write

An unauthorized immigrant who had been arrested multiple times in New Jersey and New York was sent back to El Salvador last week, where he was wanted on murder charges, federal officials said.

Brian Alejandro Martinez, who has also gone by the name Maximiliano Cornejo, was flown to El Salvador and turned over to local authorities Friday, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials said.

“This individual’s egregious immigration history and serious criminal history in the U.S., as well as being wanted for homicide in his home country, shows that he is a dangerous individual who warranted removal from the community and the U.S.,” said John Tsoukaris, field office director of ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations division in Newark.

He’s been deported several times going back to 2006. He’s been arrested multiple times since 2014, serving time in jail for “multiple local charges”, and was arrested on more local charges in 2016 after posting bond in 2015 pending removal proceedings. We finally get to

In July, nearly two years after his latest arrest, an immigration judge ordered him removed to El Salvador.

So, it wasn’t ICE that deported him, it was a federal judge. But, hey, let’s scapegoat ICE a bit more

Martinez’s removal from the U.S. comes as ICE has been stepping up arrests and efforts to send unauthorized immigrants back to their home countries.

In fiscal year 2017, ICE removed or returned 226,119 immigrants to their home countries, federal officials said. That is about 15,000 more than the previous year.

Here you have an illegal alien who’s already been deported and returned, making him a felony absconder, who committed enough local crimes to get him sentenced to 253 days in jail, who then committed more crimes, and is also wanted for murder charges in El Salvador, but, the media wants to attempt to position ICE as being meanies for deporting more illegals.

Regardless, ICE did their job and got rid of this dangerous criminal, yet, we still have Democratic nutters doing this

https://twitter.com/ZephyrTeachout/status/1029045620504494087

A person running for Attorney General of NY wants to protect law breakers, like the guy above, who was in her state.

Read: Credentialed Media Seems Rather Upset That Criminal “Immigrant” Was Deported To El Salvador »

Bummer: Internet Is Even Faster With The End Of Net Neutrality

Remember the utter doom that was to come with the end of the 2015 Obama Net Neutrality order, which was passed by unelected bureaucrats and turned the Internet into the same type of public utility as a 1940’s wired home phone system? Remember, it was going to be the end of the Internet?

Flash forward to today

The article from the DC highlights lots of apocalyptic tweets on the end of NN, but, you can see in the graphic (larger available at the link) that average broadband speeds jump from just under 80mbs on the day the NN repeal was announced to 96.91mbs when the repeal took official effect in July.

This is likely due to the fact that the repeal of net neutrality rules have allowed the market to dictate itself. This, in turn, has spurred competition and innovation which ultimately creates a better product for consumers.

The United States now trails only Singapore, Hong Kong, Iceland, Romania, and South Korea in overall broadband download speed.

Progressives/Socialists won’t give up on attempting to implement NN, though, because they’re deluded idiots who think having the government in charge of the Internet is a good thing.

Read: Bummer: Internet Is Even Faster With The End Of Net Neutrality »

‘Climate Change’ Causes More Car Crashes And Bad Food Quality Or Something

It’s kinda ironic, because all this is first caused by you, yes, you, driving your fossil fueled vehicle and eating farm animals

Unexpected effects of climate change: worse food safety, more car wrecks

On excessively hot days, there are more likely to be fatal car accidents and food safety problems, and police officers and government food inspectors tend to do less of their duties, according to a study published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology scientists, who analyzed data from across the United States, suggest that if the climate continues to change, by 2050 — and in another 50 or so years beyond that — our world may be less safe than it is today. (snip)

So, do hot temperatures harm government workers’ ability to do their jobs?

Obradovich and his colleagues analyzed data from more than 70 million police stops between 2000 and 2017 and more than 500,000 fatal motor vehicle crashes between 2001 and 2015. They also looked at nearly 13 million food safety violations (for restaurants and food production facilities) recorded across more than 4 million inspections between 2012 and 2016.

The researchers established the usual range of temperatures for cities and states and then examined “what happens if you have, all else equal, just an unusually warm day in that range?” Obradovich explained.

Unsurprisingly, they found that things were worse when it’s warm, and things are going to be doomy by 2050.

“For decades many social scientists have been locked in a polarizing battle over whether the environment or political institutions matter more for determining people’s wellbeing, as if it could only be one or the other,” added Hsiang, who was not involved in the new research. “What this study shows is that the environment directly affects the functioning of political institutions themselves, which in turn then matter to society.

Read: ‘Climate Change’ Causes More Car Crashes And Bad Food Quality Or Something »

If All You See…

…is a an area that is drying up but also flooding, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Other McCain, with a post on Russia Russia Russia and Obama collaboration.

Read: If All You See… »

ZOMG: Trump Stood With A Biker With A Mean Patch!

Things that the Credentialed Media have conniption fits over

(Daily Caller) The Washington Post published an article on Monday complaining that President Trump posed next to a biker wearing a “sexist” patch on his vest.

Trump met with supporters in the “Bikers For Trump” group over the weekend and posed for photos with some of the group’s members at the Trump National Golf Club in New Jersey.

The bikers typically wear vests with dozens of various patches on them, and the Washington Post zoomed in on the photos of the bikers with the president to see what the patches said.

One of the patches seemed to ruffle the feathers of one reporter, who called it “sexist.” The patch in question features an image of a topless woman with guns covering her breasts and the caption, “I [heart] guns and t***ies.”

https://twitter.com/AaronBlake/status/1029021789496782853

Tony Bruno wonders if this is grounds for impeachment. Well, everything is in Liberal World.

These media folks are such prudes. Realistically, this is tamer than half the stuff we see on the Internet. One of the most popular websites out there now is The Chive. You see “worse” stuff daily. You see “worse” stuff in women’s magazines like freaking Teen Vogue. You see “worse” stuff in Hollywood movies and on TV daily. But, this is the age of Trump Derangement Syndrome, so, this is the stuff we get from major newspapers.

Read: ZOMG: Trump Stood With A Biker With A Mean Patch! »

Good News: Climatruther Computer Model Predicts End Of Civilization By 2040

This was apparently a Big Thing back in the 1970’s, when all the media and climate scientists were talking about the coming ice age, but, now that ‘climate change’ that causes all weather, from hot to cold to wet to dry to nice days where you take mom out for a nice lunch to say thanks which is totally doom because nice days lull us into doing nothing, is a big thing they need to bring it back (via Watts Up With That?)

Apocalypse by 2040? Shock as MIT computer model predicts END DATE for civilisation

An apocalyptic computer model, processed by one of the world’s largest computers in 1973, has predicted the end of civilization  by 2040.

The prediction came from a programme nicknamed World One, which was developed by a team of MIT researchers and processed by Australia’s largest computer.

It was originally devised by computer pioneer Jay Forrester, after he was tasked by the Club of Rome to develop a model of global sustainability.

However, the shocking result of the computer calculations showed that the level of pollution and population would cause a global collapse by 2040.

I usually strip most links in articles out unless they are a specific and relevant link. Both of those are to “https://www.express.co.uk/latest/conspiracy-theory”.

This shows that the world cannot sustain the current level of population and industrial growth for more than two decades.

Australian broadcaster ABC has republished its original report from the 1970s, since there is just two years until a major change is expected according to the computer model.

The model based its predictions on trends such as pollution levels, population growth, availability of natural resources and quality of life on earth.

The eerie calculation has been remarkably accurate in certain predictions, such as a stagnated quality of life and diminishing pool of natural resources.

A fascinating forecast shows that the quality of life is expected to drop dramatically right after 2020.

At this time the broadcasters addreses the audience: “At around 2020, the condition of the planet becomes highly critical.

“If we do nothing about it, the quality of life goes down to zero. Pollution becomes so seriously it will start to kill people, which in turn will cause the population to diminish, lower than it was in the 1900.

“At this stage, around 2040 to 2050, civilised life as we know it on this planet will cease to exist.”

I bet we can fix this with a tax. And going to a hardcore Socialist economic society. And giving up our freedom to Government.

Read: Good News: Climatruther Computer Model Predicts End Of Civilization By 2040 »

Washington Post: Trump’s Guilty Till He Proves Himself Innocent

For people who say they’re totally for civil liberties, Democrats sure like to come out against them when a Republican is involved (we’re still waiting for the opinion pieces from the WaPost, NY Times, LA Times, CNN, etc on Keith Ellison), going with the “guilty till proven innocent” belief

There’s no need to fear Mueller, Mr. President — if you’ve nothing to hide

(that’s the headline on the web front page. Inside the article it’s “Meet with Mueller already, Mr. President”

RUDOLPH W. GIULIANI, President Trump’s lawyer, told the Wall Street Journal in an interview published Sunday that Mr. Trump would not sit down with special counsel Robert S. Mueller III if the meeting would fall after Sept. 1, “because we’re not going to be the ones to interfere with the election.” We would accuse Mr. Giuliani of moving the goal posts, except that Mr. Trump’s lawyers have never clearly pledged that the president would meet with Mr. Mueller at any time. Just last week they suggested Mr. Trump would take questions about collusion but not obstruction of justice.

This silly game has gone on far too long. The country was attacked. Mr. Mueller is trying to determine what happened. The president should be eager to help the country learn and move on. Instead, his lawyers have spent the summer hemming and hawing about the right circumstances for an interview.

Perhaps Mr. Mueller should take his politicized investigation which is full of mostly Democrats and has focused on processed crimes with little to nothing to do with Russia blasting a few Facebook posts and tweets and investigate the people who were in office when this was going on.

After more blah blah blah

If Mr. Trump has done nothing wrong and intends to tell the truth, he should welcome Mr. Mueller’s questioning and do everything possible to hasten the special counsel’s final report. Yet , Mr. Giuliani raised the possibility of the Trump side instead preparing its own report to counter whatever Mr. Mueller releases. The effort to create a he-said, he-said situation only heightens the impression that the president has reason to fear the truth. To help dispel that impression, he should answer Mr. Mueller’s questions, and soon.

There’s so much wrong with that, starting with the notion that if you’re refusing to voluntarily throw yourself on the floor in front of a prosecutor (indict a ham sandwich) you must be guilty of something. Even a president has rights.

But, remember, this is the same paper which never wanted Obama nor his team investigated over numerous wrong-doings. Is this a bit “whataboutism”? Well, of course. But, the WaPost never came out and said “give up the info, Mr. President!” when it came to things like Benghazi and Fast and Furious, both of which resulted in actual deaths, unlike this Russian interference, which….what did it do, by the way? Did it make Hillary collapse on 9/11? Forget to visit states she needed? Insult tens of millions of Americans? Or, remember when Team Obama with Hillary at State interfered with Russian elections, along with those in other countries?

Regardless, imagine Hillary was in office and being accused of collusion: think the Washington Post Editorial Board would telling her to testify, or that Mueller needs to show proof or move on?

Read: Washington Post: Trump’s Guilty Till He Proves Himself Innocent »

“Climate Change Is the Inevitable Consequence of Capitalist Privatization” Or Something

Who’s surprised that the Cult of Climastrology is against capitalism? James Delingpole refers to the extreme environmentalists as watermelons, meaning green on the outside, red on the inside, a reference to all the pro-Soviet Union nutters moving from their Communism support to the environmental movement when the USSR collapsed. Here’s Nathaniel Matthews-Trigg at the ultra left Common Dreams, which is able to post this garbage thanks to capitalist created Internet and all the protocols and hosting, and, oh, hey, makes money by engaging in capitalism by selling products

Climate Change Is the Inevitable Consequence of Capitalist Privatization

The notion of the commons refers to shared land, publicly available for all people to access for leisure and when times get tough, for survival. Publicly shared lands have existed since humans first walked the earth but have progressively been enclosed for individual sustenance or for profit. The most profound period of enclosures came with the introduction of European capitalism, and mass displacement of agricultural people to toil in industrial factories.

Throughout European and U.S. colonialism, the genocide, enslavement, and displacement of indigenous people from their lands was “justified” via the pseudo-science concept of Social Darwinism—the notion that humans inherently compete for resources and the most violent and coercive are rightfully in charge. Similarly, the pseudo-science tragedy of the commons was created to justify the privatization of public lands. This “tragedy” was based on the premise that shared resources will inherently be exploited and destroyed by the unruly public. That if left to their own volition people are inherently greedy, they don’t think in the long-term, they don’t communicate, and just like Social Darwinism, they must compete. Economist Elinor Ostrom debunked the tragedy of the commons and in doing so became the first woman to win a Nobel Peace Prize for Economics.

See? Private land ownership leads to genocide, enslavement, and displacement. And this is all linked to people who dare engage in capitalism

Our atmosphere, a publicly needed space containing many vital resources such as nitrogen, oxygen, and carbon dioxide—may seem to the untrained eye to be the tragedy of the commons playing out above our heads. But this is hardly the case, and one must only take their head out of the clouds and refocus on the social developments on-the-ground to see that climate change is really the tragedy of the enclosures, the inevitable consequence of capitalist privatization.

“Capitalism’s grow-or-die imperative stands radically at odds with ecology’s imperative of interdependence and limit. The two imperatives can no longer coexist with each other; nor can any society founded on the myth that they can be reconciled hope to survive. Either we will establish an ecological society or society will go under for everyone, irrespective of his or her status.” —Murray Bookchin

Capitalism is an economic system based on competition, and competition is a state of constant warfare. The competing corporation must always be in the process of growing, strengthening, improving in combat, and always ready to strike—or risk losing everything to someone or something that’s biggest, stronger, or more strategic. For corporations, success is based on profit, and profits are used to continue the cycle of growth, exploitation, and political influence.

And the obvious answer is to install some sort of Socialist/Communistic type of system

But there are other options to consider. A government or community could stop the corporations from being able to purchase the forest in the first place. The workers of the corporation could take over production from the CEO and run the corporation in a way that benefits the local community and local environment. Just as diverse as we humans are, so too are the creative ways we can organize ourselves to create a more sustainable future.

These people. Of course, they always want this for Other People, never themselves. They get mad when others restrict their own engagement in capitalism.

Read: “Climate Change Is the Inevitable Consequence of Capitalist Privatization” Or Something »

Pirate's Cove