…is a world drying out from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Vlad Tepes, with a post wondering if the yellow vest protesters are moving to Germany.
Read: If All You See… »
…is a world drying out from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Vlad Tepes, with a post wondering if the yellow vest protesters are moving to Germany.
Read: If All You See… »
Washington’s Initiative 1639 is all about strongarming citizens into giving up their 2nd Amendment Right
Using gun safes under Washington’s newest gun control regulation
When Initiative 1639 goes into effect, gun owners can be charged with a crime if their firearms end up in the wrong hands. That has a lot of gun owners asking about their options. What about gun safes?
The initiative was approved by about 60 percent of Washington voters this November. It is already facing legal challenges and one Washington police chief refuses to enforce it.
But other arguments have emerged around the issue of gun safes — one method of keeping firearms secure. I-1639 does address safe storage of firearms. It holds gun owners accountable if their deadly weapon gets into the wrong hands and is used in a crime.
The article goes on to describe the different types of safes one can use to store your firearm. A firearm locked in a safe is one that cannot be used to protect oneself nor one’s family. A quick explanation of I1639
Enter I-1639, a measure that represents the most sweeping, comprehensive gun control legislation in any state. It will enact waiting periods and background checks on the purchase of semiautomatic weapons, an increase to the minimum age for purchasing semiautomatic weapons from 18 to 21, storage requirements for firearms, and a class-C felony for any gun owner whose firearm is used by an unlicensed party.
So, if your gun is stolen and used in a crime, you’re going to jail. What this really does is force citizens with firearms to either store firearms used for self defense in a safe all the time, making them worthless for their purpose. Or just get rid of them.
Now, if you’re an idiot and just leaving your gun in the glovebox, under the seat, etc, while you walk away from your vehicle, OK, fine, that is not a proper way to leave a firearm. It’s not a toy. You should lock it up. Keep a special safe in your vehicle. But, you leave it in your nightstand or on a top shelf in the closet for a reason. Regardless, this is stealth gun grabbing
Initiative I-1639 is an important step in the right direction
Initiative 1639 has passed in Washington State, which is a step in the right direction for gun control. However, with the current political climate, it is time to stop thinking of guns as a fundamental freedom and see them as they are: lethal, volatile weapons that need to be out of the hands of as many Americans as possible.
In other words, getting creative to force people to give up their firearms. And this is just the first step towards a total gun ban for private citizens, leaving Government with the guns. Be careful what you wish for, gun grabbers.
The same state also has no problem protecting illegal aliens, including those who commit crimes.
There are obviously lots and lots of thinly veiled opinion pieces and stated opinion pieces running through the news with last Friday’s release of a ‘climate change’ study. It’s a yearly thing, as at least one Big Study is released shortly before the late November/early December UN IPCC Conference On the Parties meeting. The NY Times has multiple pieces, including Paul Krugman is yammering about the “depravity of climate change denial.” Hmm. In my opinion, if you haven’t given up your own use of fossil fuels but say you believe in anthropogenic climate change, then you’re actually a denier
The Washington Post has multiple pieces, including the Editorial Board of a paper which uses vast amounts of fossil fuels and has a big carbon footprint for their news operations, stating that future Americans won’t forget Trump and the GOP’s climate negligence. And then we come to Catherine Rampell pimping one of my favorites, the notion that carbon taxes are totes free market
Republicans say they want free-market innovation. Then they should want a carbon tax.
(lots of paragraphs of doom and gloom and what she calls “Republican excuse making”)
On NBC’s “Meet the Press,†Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) also acknowledged that “the burning of fossil fuels†isn’t the “healthiest for Planet Earth.†Asked if he supported a carbon tax, though, he said no. The reason: “If we’re going to move away from fossil fuels, it’s got to be done through innovation. And innovation can be choked out through excessive government regulation.â€
Here’s the thing. Taxing carbon is exactly how you get faster innovation. That’s kinda the point.
A carbon tax prices in, upfront, the hidden costs of burning fossil fuels, including pollution and the warming of the planet. In the near-term, a carbon tax disincentivizes the purchase of carbon-intensive products, of course. But over the longer-term, it also increases demand for — and thereby incentivizes the development of — cleaner, less-carbon-intensive technologies. If you want to accelerate innovation in batteries, electric cars, solar, wind, etc., a carbon tax is a no-brainer.
See? A carbon tax is totally free market! And it has nothing to do with Government trying to harm one sector while helping another!
Additionally, if Republicans truly want to walk the walk on reducing “excessive government regulation,†there’s plenty for them to do. There are tons of regulations and subsidies that  encourage use of fossil fuels — and slow down innovation in greener technologies.
There are, for instance, the enormous tax breaks and other subsidies for oil and coal. Or Trump’s proposed bailouts for failing coal plants. Or his tariffs on solar panels.
Policymakers could also take action to crush the NIMBYism that impedes offshore wind farms. Or they could discourage or even preempt lots of other stupid state and local rules and regulations. These include building codes that inhibit solar, or the unstandardized, jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction permitting process that makes installation more difficult.
All of which is to say that prioritizing innovation and the cutting of red tape are not actually an excuse for inaction on climate change. In fact, they’re key to the solution.
On one hand, she has a point: there are lots and lots of government rules and regulations at the federal, state, and local level that make things difficult for commerce. On the other, most of those tax breaks are the same ones other companies use. They aren’t specific for oil and coal. The tariffs are because China has been dumping cheap panels in the U.S. in order to undercut U.S. solar panel makers. Most of the wind farm NIMBYism comes from coastal elites who say they believe in man-caused climate change and vote Democrat.
Slapping massive federal regulations on states and municipalities doesn’t quite sound free market, does it? Nor does a government run carbon tax.
Read: Washington Post: Free Market Republicans Should Totally Want A Carbon Tax Or Something »
This is the kind of thing that the media were running with in regards to the migrants getting gassed for rushing the border and throwing rocks and other things
https://twitter.com/LisaMei62/status/1067031604781035520
A woman with two kids. Wonder if it was staged? And then this happened to MSNBC
MSNBC REPORTER BUSTS NARRATIVE, ADMITS MIGRANTS ARE MOSTLY MEN
MSNBC reporter Gadi Schwartz, who is on the ground in Tijuana, Mexico, said Monday that most of the caravan members he’s encountered are males — many of whom are not seeking asylum.
MSNBC anchor Stephanie Ruhle asked Schwartz to characterize the group of migrants he’s encountered, stating, “Some people look at these images and they listen to the president, who says, ‘It’s not women and children, it’s stone cold criminals.’â€
“Give us the profile of who’s there mostly and what they’re looking for,†Ruhle added.
Schwartz explained that there are a lot of families “in the inner sanctum of the shelter,†but revealed that outside of the tent city there are scores of men trying to cross the border.
“The truth is, the majority of the people that are in this caravan, especially outside — if we can make our way all the way over there, we’ll show you the majority of them are men,†Schwartz said. “From what we’ve seen, the majority are actually men and some of these men have not articulated that need for asylum.â€
Schwartz said that a lot of the men in the caravan have shared economic reasons for migrating or have expressed a desire for a “better life.â€
But, MSNBC did not want to give up its Narrative
Despite Schwartz’s reporting, MSNBC anchor Katy Tur asked “how much lower†the U.S. can go and insisted border agents were throwing tear gas at primarily women and children.
“These are the images. A mom pulling her two daughters away from the tear gas,†Tur said. “The very people in charge are treating these people as an invading army, including these moms, including these kids.â€
In other words, Tur was looking at the same photo (probably staged) that the rest of the media was running. And the mostly male migrants (reminds one of what was happening in Europe, where all these “refugees” were appearing and were mostly males 45 and under) were using the few women and children as shields.
And people wonder why Trump keeps calling them fake news?
Read: Narrative Fail: MSNBC Exposes That Migrants Are Mostly Male And Not Seeking Asylum »
Hey, why not? Virtually every one their predictions has failed to materialize, and most of the scientific community and the news media fail to call them out on it
Climate change to make UK summers more than 5C hotter by 2070, Met Office warns
Extreme heatwaves will scorch the UK as rising sea levels swallow large expanses of the coastline within just a few decades, experts have warned.
In the first major analysis of the nation’s changing climate for nearly a decade, government and Met Office scientists concluded that summer temperatures could shoot up by 5.4C by 2070 if fossil fuel pollution is not slashed.
Winters will also be considerably hotter, with average temperatures increasing by up to 4.2C.
The scientists outlined a far more extreme version of Britain’s climate in which this year’s weeks-long heatwave becomes the norm while winter rainfall increases by more than a third.
Flooding will also be a major issue as sea levels around the country rise, and coastal communities will have to adapt rapidly or abandon homes to the rising tides.
Sea levels affecting London could rise by up to 1.15 metres by 2100 if climate-warming emissions continue to climb.
Even if emissions are cut in line with the Paris climate agreement to curb temperature rises to well below 2C above pre-industrial levels, sea levels could still be up to 70cm higher in the capital by 2100.
First, 5.4C equals a 9.72 Fahrenheit increase in less than 50 years, when the Earth has only seen a reported 1.5F increase since 1850. They’re claiming that winters will be 7.56F hotter. This is beyond insane, and has zero basis in science nor reality.
A 1.5 meter increase is 4.92 feet. 70cm is 2.29 feet. Despite the 20th Century only having seen eight inches of sea rise, and there being zero acceleration in sea rise. It’s all about trying to scare people into giving up their money and freedom.
Oh, and
How about if
A) You haven't given up your own use of fossil fuels;
B) Haven't made your own life carbon neutral
C) Are given donations by groups with a vested interest in taxing other peoplethen you shouldn't have a seat at the table w/ people addressing 'climate change'
— William Teach2 ??????? #refuseresist (@WTeach2) November 26, 2018
Read: Nutters Prognosticate U.K. Being 5 Degrees Celsius Warmer By 2070 »
…is a horrible evil leather jacket from horrible evil cows, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Sonoran Conservative, with a post on the dumbest tweet of the day.
Read: If All You See… »
Who wants to tell her and John Sarbanes, a Democrat, represents Maryland’s 3rd Congressional District, who cowrote this? Also, there are a few other things she needs to be told
The Democratic majority’s first order of business: Restore democracy
Earlier this month, Americans went to the polls and sent a powerful message: The election not only was a resounding verdict against Republicans’ assault on Americans’ health care and wages, but it also was a vote to rescue our broken democracy.
In the face of a torrent of special-interest dark money, partisan gerrymandering and devious vote-suppression schemes, voters elected a House Democratic majority determined to bring real change to restore our democracy.
During the campaign, Democrats declared unequivocally that we would clean up corruption to make Washington work for the people. We pledged to reduce the role of money in politics, to restore ethics and integrity to government, and to strengthen voting laws.
Really? Because a) the House switch very often happens during a president’s first term, and b) they didn’t run on this at all
Anyway, here are her ideas
First, let’s end the dominance of money in politics. For far too long, big-money and corporate special interests have undermined the will of the people and subverted policymaking in Washington — enabling soaring health-care costs and prescription drug prices, undermining clean air and clean water for our children, and blocking long-overdue wage increases for hard-working Americans.
So let’s rein in the unaccountable “dark money†unleashed by the Supreme Court’s Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision by requiring all political organizations to disclose their donors and by shutting down the shell game of big-money donations to super PACs. We must also empower hard-working Americans in our democracy by building a 21st-century campaign-finance system — combining small-donor incentives and matching support — to increase and multiply the power of small donors. Wealthy special interests shouldn’t be able to buy more influence than the workers, consumers and families who should be our priority in Washington.
Interesting, considering the huge amounts of cash Democrats receive from Hollywood, news media and other lefty industries, plus single donors like George Soros and Tom Steyer. Also interesting, Pelosi is recommending legislation that basically has already been declared unconstitutional.
Next, let’s make sure that when public servants get to Washington, they serve the public. Restoring the public’s trust means closing the revolving door between government and private industries, and imposing strong new ethics laws to stop officials from using their public office for personal gain. To do so, we will expand conflict-of-interest laws, ban members of Congress from serving on for-profit boards, revamp the oversight authority of the Office of Government Ethics and prohibit public servants from receiving bonus payments from their former employers to enter government. We’ll curb the influence of high-powered Washington insiders by closing lobbyist registration loopholes that allow big-money power brokers and foreign actors to operate in the shadows. That way, well-connected special interests won’t be able to steer the policy agenda away from the priorities of the American public.
Not bad ideas, I can mostly agree with this, but, notice two big ones that are missing: restricting members of Congress and their staffs and families from engaging in trading and other economic activity based on insider knowledge of legislation. Also, implementing term limits for the House. How bad is it for “democracy” that some serve as elected officials for decade after decade after decade? Pelosi has been in the House since 1987, having zero connection with working people, never having to go home and live under the laws she votes for.
Finally, let’s make it easier, not harder, to vote. Since the Supreme Court took the teeth out of the Voting Rights Act, Republican political operatives have increasingly turned to blatant schemes to make it more difficult for the Americans left behind to participate in elections — a narrow agenda all too often targeted at communities of color.
We must renew the Voting Rights Act to protect every citizen’s access to the ballot box and restore the vital safeguard of pre-clearance requirements for areas with a history of voter suppression. We will promote national automatic voter registration, bolster our critical election infrastructure against foreign attackers, and put an end to partisan gerrymandering once and for all by establishing federal guidelines to outlaw the practice. No American should face hours-long lines, broken voting machines or rules rigged to keep their vote from being counted in our elections.
So, she wants to re-implement something SCOTUS has already whacked as unconstitutional? Interestingly, the majority of voting precincts that have issues election after election are those run by Democrats.
As for gerrymandering, consider that Pelosi’s congressional district is considered one of the safest Democrat strongholds in the country. And the gerrymandering is one reason for that.
Read: Nancy Pelosi Is Super Enthused To Restore Democracy! »
You’ve heard about the protests in France, where citizens are unhappy that the Macron government is implementing the very taxes on fossil fuels that Warmists thought would hit Other People, not themselves. But, there are also protests in London, which I mentioned previously in regards to gluing their hands to doors
Britain’s climate protests: ‘We are rebelling on behalf of life itself’
As consumers all over the world scrambled to buy discounted goods in the Black Friday sales, campaigners from a newly formed civic society group in the United Kingdom took to the streets of London to protest against their government’s failure to act on climate change—and are urging citizens in other countries to do the same.
Extinction Rebellion (ER), a mass civil disobedience group in the style of the Occupy movement, has been protesting since 31 October. The movement came to a head over the weekend, when it blockaded areas all over the capital, including Downing Street, the residence of the prime minister, Oxford Street, Britain’s busiest main shopping district, and Buckingham Palace. Some areas of London were brought to a standstill.
An estimated 1,000 people took part in the protests holding banners that read “System change not climate changeâ€. A number of protesters were arrested, including an elderly lady who glued her hands to the railings of Buckingham Palace.
First, look at all their clothes and smartphones and stuff. They sure appear to be using consumer created stuff by big companies. Second, you might not want to compare them to Occupy Wall Street, as that devolved into sexual assault, rape, violence, stabbings, murder, rampant drug use, pooping on cop cars and people’s door steps, and attempted bombings, not too mention people living in filth. Third, perhaps using a symbol that reminds people of the Anarchy one and screwing up people’s days won’t get them on your side.
ER is demanding that the government be honest about the dangers of climate change, and produces a credible plan to rapidly decarbonise the world’s fifth largest economy. “Our government is complicit in allowing greenhouse gas emissions to rise and ignoring the constraints of a finite planet in favour of an economic system demanding rampant consumerism,†the group states on its website.
Their demands are hilarious. One is a total decarbonization of Britain by 2025. They forget to offer any ideas to do this, nor have any pledged any changes in their own lives, but, they also demand that a “Citizens Assembly” be given the power to make the changes, because the government can’t be trusted. Last I checked, a citizens assembly” is called “Parliament.”
The protesters say that when a government does not protect its citizens from harm, and does not ensure a liveable future for generations to come, it has failed in the most basic of its functions as a government. â€We understand that it is not only our right, it is our duty to rebel on behalf of life itself,†the group says.

Read: British ‘Climate Change’ Protesters Are “Rebelling On Behalf Of Life Itself” Or Something »
The goings on at the border have made the Credentialed Media and Democrats, but I digress, Very Upset
Caravan crisis escalates with tear gas and entry closure at the border
U.S. authorities closed off the busiest port of entry along the U.S. border with Mexico on Sunday and fired tear gas at members of a Central American migrant caravan who had rushed the fencing that separates the countries.
Although the number of people at the border was relatively small, the unrest — with migrants attempting to climb fences and run through car lanes to reach the United States, and scenes of mothers and children choking on tear gas — represented a serious escalation of the crisis.
What had begun Sunday morning as a migrant protest of the slow pace of the U.S. asylum claims process devolved into a chaotic scramble in which hundreds made their way to the border hoping to cross onto U.S. soil. To block that from happening, and as some threw rocks and bottles, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers took the rare step of firing tear gas into Mexico as well as closing all legal vehicle and foot traffic to the San Ysidro border crossing, which U.S. officials say normally has about 100,000 visitors per day.
Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen said in a statement that the port of entry was closed “to ensure public safety in response to large numbers of migrants seeking to enter the U.S. illegally.â€
Some of the migrants tried to breach the border fencing and “sought to harm CBP personnel by throwing projectiles at them,†the statement said.
Although the majority of the group approached and gathered at the fence peacefully, Mexico’s Interior Ministry said that hundreds tried to cross the border in a “violent manner.†Mexican authorities said they would deport anyone who tried to cross illegally.
“Peacefully”. The groups was in the hundreds, so, if hundreds tried to cross the border in a violent manner, that blows out that most approached and gathered peacefully.
“Desperation has led some people to really believe that crossing is possible,†said Alex Almendares, 22, a member of the caravan from Colón, Honduras. “The U.S. has given us no response, and the situation at the shelter keeps getting worse.â€
We did not invite you. You decided to trek thousands of miles and Demand that the U.S. let you in and give you food, shelter, education, healthcare, and money, among others. And now y’all are rushing the border and throwing objects at U.S. law enforcement personnel.
“The U.S. isn’t letting us through and I can’t live in those conditions in the shelter,†she said. “I want to go to the U.S. and not stay in Mexico, because there are more opportunities.â€
Mexico has offered asylum. The migrants want to take advantage of the richer country to Get Stuff.
Here’s what it looked like (more tweets with video at the link)
https://twitter.com/WendyFry_/status/1066791682899959808
This has driven many liberals right off the edge of sanity, like Alyssa Milano, who is representative of what other libs are saying. Interestingly, none of them nor the media folks who are linking this all to Trump (forgetting that Mexican federal police showed up to stop the rioting on their side of the border, as well) are mentioning this happened under Obama
2013: "A group of about 100 people trying to illegally cross the border Sunday near the San Ysidro port of entry threw rocks & bottles at U.S. Border Patrol agents, who responded by using pepper spray & other means to force the crowd back into Mexico, federal officials said." pic.twitter.com/78SGfElqMQ
— Jeryl Bier (@JerylBier) November 25, 2018
And none of them said boo back then.
Read: ZOMG: Mostly Peaceful Migrants Hit With Tear Gas By Border Agents! »
If we’re discussing #TrumpDerangementSyndrome, it pretty much applies to people going full on Moonbat to anything Trump related. Usually, we can apply this to Sarah Sanders, since she is his press secretary, and utterly drives liberals nuts. But, this bit of insanity is enough to bring out #SandersDerangementSyndrome on its own
Busy Philipps gives Sarah Sanders a dirty look after seeing her at Disney World
Mickey, Minnie and … Sarah Sanders?
For Busy Tonight host Busy Philipps, 39, a normal vacation to Disney World had an interesting plot twist when she ran into White House press secretary Sarah Sanders.
Describing herself as “truly shook,†Philipps announced on her Instagram Stories that she spotted Sanders after exiting the Rock ’n’ Roller Coaster, an enclosed thrill ride located in Disney’s Hollywood Studios.
“Guys we just went on the rock and roll roller coaster,†said Philipps, wearing bright red lipstick and oversized blue sunglasses. “Scarier than that, when i got off, Sarah Huckabee Sanders was there. And she had a security guard so we didn’t see anything, but i did do this.†Philipps gave a dirty look to the camera, furrowing her brow and scrunching her forehead.
“Honestly I didn’t want to say anything because I didn’t want to get kicked out of the park, and we were not with our kids because they were waiting with someone else. I gave her such a mean look,†said Philipps, with a drop of humor. “She saw it. She saw it.â€
She also mentioned it on Twitter
Just gave Sarah Huckabee Sanders a very dirty look at DisneyWorld. Just doesn’t seem fair that she gets to enjoy it with her family while families are suffering because of the lies she spreads.
— Busy Philipps (@BusyPhilipps) November 23, 2018
How deranged is this? She was “shook”? “Scarier”? Gave a mean look? I’d ask what’s the matter with these people, but, we all know they’re deranged.
Read: SDS: Busy Phillips Claims To Have Given Sarah Sanders Dirty Look At Disney »