Bummer: Even Mexicans Are Sick Of Illegal Aliens Invading Their Country

How this got published in the Washington Post is beyond me. Someone must have slipped something by the controlling editors

Unauthorized immigrants face public backlash in Mexico, survey finds

Mexicans are deeply frustrated with immigrants after a year of heightened migration from Central America through the country, according to a survey conducted by The Washington Post and Mexico’s Reforma newspaper.

More than 6 in 10 Mexicans say migrants are a burden on their country because they take jobs and benefits that should belong to Mexicans. A 55 percent majority supports deporting migrants who travel through Mexico to reach the United States.

Those findings defy the perception that Mexico — a country that has sent millions of its own migrants to the United States, sending billions of dollars in remittances — is sympathetic to the surge of Central Americans. Instead, the data suggests Mexicans have turned against the migrants transiting through their own country, expressing antipathy that would be familiar to many supporters of President Trump north of the border.

It’s an amazing poll

Only 7% want to give them residency. 88% want them gone/temporary residence.

But 51 percent of Mexicans support using the country’s newly formed national guard to combat migration of undocumented immigrants in Mexico, a key provision of the agreement. Just under half of Mexicans have heard about the June agreement, but among those who have, 59 percent favor it while 34 percent are opposed.

They’re finding out exactly what bringing tons of low skill people who need government assistance brings, especially when those same people aren’t coming because they love Mexico, they just want the free money, shelter, clothes, food, healthcare, education, housing, etc.

Read: Bummer: Even Mexicans Are Sick Of Illegal Aliens Invading Their Country »

Cult Of Climastrology Is Now Attempting To Hijack People With Disabilities

There really is almost nothing that Warmists won’t attempt to hijack to fold in under the banner of ‘climate change’. Now it is people with disabilities, which I haven’t seen before

The U.N. Is Calling for the Inclusion of People With Disabilities in the Climate Change Debate

A line of elderly citizens unable to board a bus to evacuate a senior home. People with limited mobility sitting helpless by the side of the road. Wheelchairs buried in mud after a flood. Scenes and accounts like these became the norm in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, one of the deadliest natural disasters in United States history.

Ten years later, a documentary called The Right to Be Rescued showed, through the perspective of survivors, what official reports would also confirm: People with disabilities were disproportionately affected by the disaster.

You can thank the Democratic governments in the area for that. They didn’t seem to have problems in Mississippi and Alabama, which were hit just as hard as New Orleans and Louisiana. They were just run by Republicans and weren’t full of people whose whole lives depended on Government

Over the last few years, stories about people with disabilities being left behind have continued to surface after tropical storms and wildfires in Puerto Rico, Texas, and California. Recently, the United Nations warned that climate crisis disasters are happening at the rate of one per week, urging developing countries to prepare for impact and to develop strategies to protect the most vulnerable populations, such as the poor, the elderly, children, and disabled people.

Last Friday, the United Nations Human Rights Council announced a resolutionaddressing for the first time the rights of people with disabilities in connection with climate change. The document urges governments to listen to those who are affectedthe most by environmental changes, by adopting a “comprehensive, integrated, gender-responsive and disability-inclusive approach to climate change adaptation and mitigation policies.”

Anyone with disabilities should think really hard about letting these nutters place their rights and such under the banner of Hotcoldwetdry, because they will always then be secondary to the goals of Hotcoldwetdry. The ‘climate change’ nuts are just using people of disabilities to achieve their own nefarious goals.

Read: Cult Of Climastrology Is Now Attempting To Hijack People With Disabilities »

Ilhan Omar Introduces Pro-BDS Resolution In House, Compares It To Boycott Of Nazis

Now, the text of the resolution as submitted doesn’t mention Israel or the BDS movement, but, come on, the lady hates Israel and Jews, and the BDS movement is, at its heart, anti-Semitic, and the way she introduced it should tell you where she’s going with it

Ilhan Omar invokes boycott of Nazi Germany in resolution supporting Israel boycotts

Rep. Ilhan Omar introduced a resolution in support of the Boycott, Divest, Sanctions movement saying it was in a long tradition of U.S. boycotts.

“Americans of conscience have a proud history of participating in boycotts to advocate for human rights abroad including … boycotting Nazi Germany from March 1933 to October 1941 in response to the dehumanization of the Jewish people in the lead-up to the Holocaust,” Omar said in the resolution introduced Tuesday.

The 1930s boycott by the U.S. Jews of German goods came during the lead up to Holocaust starting in part with Germans boycotting Jewish businesses.

Omar announced her resolution Tuesday in an interview with Al-Monitor.

“We are introducing a resolution … to really speak about the American values that support and believe in our ability to exercise our first amendment rights in regard to boycotting,” the Minnesota Democrat. “And it is an opportunity for us to explain why it is we support a nonviolent movement, which is the BDS movement.”

Omar said she plans on introducing the BDS resolution this week around the same time House Democratic leaders plan on voting on a resolution condemning the movement.

A resolution condemning the movement is not the same as stopping the movement, especially when the BDS movement is inherently anti-Jew, just like its cofounder. It really never was about being against the actions of the state of Israel, it was about hating Jews and wanting them eliminated, just like they want Israel eliminated. And, in context, Omar introducing this is just more of her hatred towards Israel and Jews, especially with her like-minded buddy Rashida Tlaib co-sponsoring it. Per the text of the resolution, she’s comparing Israel and her citizens to those of Imperial Japan during WW2, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union (which so many Democrats supported, especially during the Reagan era), and apartheid era South Africa.

(Washington Examiner) Rep. Lee Zeldin criticized Rep. Ilhan Omar for supporting a movement he said was linked to Hamas after she introduced a resolution supporting the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement.

“My colleague who just spoke used the frequent use of the words ‘honestly’ and ‘honest.’ Let’s just get to a lot of what is left out,” the 39-year-old New York Republican said Wednesday, referring to Omar, who had just given a speech during a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing supporting a resolution promoting the BDS movement. “The BDS movment has not distanced itself from Hamas, a designated foreign terrorist organization. BDS supporters individually are not distancing themselves from Hamas either.”

The Jewish representative then went on to explain that a senior Hamas official has called for the death of all Jews last week.

Zeldin continued to criticize the resolution after the hearing in a statement: “[T]here are Members of this House who continue to prop up the BDS movement and blame Israel for all of its challenges. Israel is our best ally in the Middle East; a beacon of hope, freedom and liberty surrounded by existential threats. Shame on Rep. Omar for bringing her hateful twist of this reality today to the committee and this chamber.”

With the introduction of the resolution, will Israel PM Netanyahu allow Omar and Tlaib into Israel?

(Times of Jerusalem) On Wednesday, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar announced that she will be visiting Israel and the Palestinian territories in the coming weeks.

Omar will be accompanied by Rep. Rashida Tlaib. The two freshman congresswomen have become a focal point of the Jewish community after expressing numerous controversial comments regarding Israel and several statements that were deemed anitsemitic.

Israel has a law the grants the government authority to ban pro-BDS activists from entering the country. The law has been used sporadically over the past two years.

A government official told The Jerusalem Post on Thursday that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s National Security Council was reviewing the issue and would offer him recommendations on how to respond.

Most likely, the two will be allowed access to Israel, particularly since they are, for good or bad, they are elected federal Representatives. Also, Netanyahu and his people understand this would get them criticism in the press (which tends to be Israel/Jew hating Progressives). Instead, Israel will allow them to do their thing, and make sure all their actions are on video, especially the anti-Israel, anti-Jew, pro-Palestinian terrorist stuff. It’s the old meme about not interrupting your enemy when they are making a mistake. You can bet the video will show up for viewing.

Read: Ilhan Omar Introduces Pro-BDS Resolution In House, Compares It To Boycott Of Nazis »

Wokeness: Washington Post Claims Moon Landing Was Sexist And Racist

This is actually in the straight news section, albeit the Lifestyle section. Leftists just can’t help in pooping on everything

Sigh

As NASA worked relentlessly to fulfill John F. Kennedy’s goal of landing a man on the moon by decade’s end, it turned to the nation’s engineers. Many of them were fresh out of school, running the gamut from mechanical to electrical engineers, because that’s mostly what was taught in universities, and almost exclusively to white men.

In archival Apollo 11 photos and footage, it’s a “Where’s Waldo?” exercise to spot a woman or person of color.

“I don’t want to be politically incorrect here, but the workforce, the culture, was white male. In the firing room, we had almost 500 people and we have one female, one black guy and one Hispanic,” says Ike Rigell, 96, chief engineer and deputy director of launch vehicle operations at the Kennedy Space Center in Central Florida. “That was the culture.”

That’s how it opens. After that, a long chunk has nothing to do with the opening, but eventually moves on to sexism, handsy people, wage disparities, and all the rest.

It was a different time, different era, so attempting to place modern day standards is silly. But, then, this is Wokeness.

Of course, it’s all fake, because the moon landings never happened, right?

Read: Wokeness: Washington Post Claims Moon Landing Was Sexist And Racist »

RNC Releases Ad Using The Democrats Own Words

Brutal

Again, this is the type of thing Republicans have been begging for for decades, but especially since the Bush 43 years. Democrats have been free to be as nasty as they want, while Republicans were just “get along go along.” Even Bush 43 himself. Somewhere back in the archives is a post about me refusing to continue to defend him and his administration when they wouldn’t defend themselves. Politics is a verbal sparring sport (which includes some writing), and you cannot always take the high road. Mitt Romney (who’s attacking Trump right now) tried that in 2012: how’d that work out? So did John McCain. If you won’t forcefully stand for your beliefs, why should anyone believe you?

(Fox News) A relative handful of Republicans, meanwhile, spoke out against the president’s attacks on the four women:

Mitt Romney: “Destructive, demeaning and disunifying.” Lisa Murkowski: “There is no excuse for the president’s spiteful comments–they were absolutely unacceptable and this needs to stop.” Tim Scott, the only black Republican in the Senate, chided Trump for “unacceptable personal attacks and racially charged language.”

That’s from a Howie Kurtz article which has a lot more in it with Republicans defending, but, let it be noted, these same Republicans above rarely condemn the language of the Democrats. How does that help?

Read: RNC Releases Ad Using The Democrats Own Words »

If All You See…

…is a horrendous carbon pollution infused beer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Brass Pills, with a post on “Millennial Writer Cries at Work, Puts Mother on Speakerphone after Her Boss Corrects Her Spelling”

Read: If All You See… »

Bummer: Climate Despair Is Making (Crazy People) Give Up On Life

How does this work again?

  1. Manufacture a crisis from normal climate actions of the Earth, blame Mankind
  2. Tell everyone it is a doomy crisis, especially in schools for young minds
  3. Tell people that this tiny increase in the Earth’s average temperature, totally usual, is causing mental illness
  4. When some people start identifying with that mental illness, talk it up and say how bad this is and that we can fix it with a tax

From the lunatic screed

In the summer of 2015—the warmest year on record at the time—it was the literal heat that got to Meg Ruttan Walker, a 37-year-old former teacher in Kitchener, Ontario. “Summers have been stressful to me since having my son,” said Ruttan Walker, who is now an environmental activist. “It’s hard to enjoy a season that’s a constant reminder that the world is getting warmer.”

“I think my anxiety just reached a peak,” Ruttan Walker continued. It felt like there was nowhere to go, and although she had spoken to her primary care doctor about anxiety, she hadn’t sought help with her mental health. Suddenly, she was contemplating self-harm. “Though I don’t think I would have hurt myself, I didn’t know how to live with the fear of… the apocalypse, I guess? My son was home with me and I had to call my friend over to watch him because I couldn’t even look at him without breaking down,” Ruttan Walker said. She eventually checked herself into an overnight mental health facility.

Her case is extreme, but many people are suffering from what could be called “climate despair,” a sense that climate change is an unstoppable force that will render humanity extinct and renders life in the meantime futile. As David Wallace-Wells noted in his 2019 bestseller The Uninhabitable Earth, “For most who perceive an already unfolding climate crisis and intuit a more complete metamorphosis of the world to come, the vision is a bleak one, often pieced together from perennial eschatological imagery inherited from existing apocalyptic texts like the Book of Revelation, the inescapable sourcebook for Western anxiety about the end of the world.”

“Climate despair” has been a phrase used at least as far back as Eric Pooley’s 2010 book, The Climate War: True Believers, Power Brokers, and the Fight to Save the Earth, but it’s been in wide circulation for perhaps as little as two years. In more progressive Sweden, the term klimatÃ¥ngest has been popular since at least 2011 (the year a Wikipedia article with that name was created). In The Uninhabitable Earth, Wallace-Wells notes that the philosopher Wendy Lynne Lee calls this phenomenon “eco-nihilism,” the Canadian politician and activist Stuart Parker prefers “climate nihilism,” and others have tried out terms like “human futilitarianism.” (snip)

But climate despair goes far beyond a reasonable concern that a warming planet will make life more difficult and force humanity to make hard choices. Instead of rallying us, climate despair asks us to give up. In a 2009 study in the UK by researchers Saffron O’Neill and Sophie Nicholson-Cole, climate-related data visualizations were presented to test subjects who were urged, in fear-based terms, to take action or else. Most of the time these appeals produced “denial, apathy, avoidance, and negative associations.” Ultimately, the researchers concluded, “climate change images can evoke powerful feelings of issue salience but these do not necessarily make participants feel able to do anything about it; in fact, it may do the reverse.” In other words, if you tell people something must be done or we’re all gonna die, they tend to take door number two, however irrational that impulse may seem.

Sounding more and more like a doomsday cult by the day, eh? This is what the scaremongering from the Warmists has created: a bunch of people freaking out and giving themselves mental illness over nothing.

Read: Bummer: Climate Despair Is Making (Crazy People) Give Up On Life »

We Are “The Squad” Now Or Something, So Let’s Go Inside A Socialism Conference

Excitable Robert Kagan thinks he’s on to something

We are all ‘the Squad’ now

President Trump has forced us all to take a position on what kind of America this is going to be — in essence, to define again what American “nationalism” means. Is it a white Christian nationalism (or if you’re Jewish and think you can wriggle yourself inside the Trumpian nationalist tent, you can call it Judeo-Christian), in which immigrants of color or other religions are not really Americans and can be told by the president to “go back” to their ancestral lands? Or is it the universalist nationalism of the Declaration of Independence, based on the liberal Enlightenment principles of equality before the law, the inviolable rights of the individual against the state and the conviction that all citizens — regardless of religion, ethnicity or ancestral roots and the timing of their arrival — are equally American?

This is hardly the first time that Americans have been presented with this question, needless to say, and they have often answered equivocally. The popular willingness to denounce and even persecute the “hyphenated” Americans of German and Irish descent during and after World War I, a frenzy spurred by leaders of both political parties; the imprisonment of U.S. citizens of Japanese descent during World War II, upheld by the Supreme Court; and of course the unending horrific treatment of African Americans — these are more than sad episodes in our history. They are as much a part of who we are as the civil rights movement and other triumphs of individual liberties. White nationalism was never just a fringe phenomenon, and it isn’t today. The South was a bastion of the white-nationalist idea for almost two centuries and with support in the last half of the 20th century from conservative thinkers such as Russell Kirk and William F. Buckley Jr. Today, the American conservative movement proudly nurtures a new nationalism, whose intellectual authors openly call on Americans to reject the universal liberal principles of the Declaration of Independence in favor of a nationhood grounded in religion and culture. It is a growth industry.

Amazing gymnastics, eh? See, this is why Trump is correct. No matter what the subject is, Democrats turn it to raaaaacism.

Yet the fight to define our nationalism has continued ever since. And that is what’s at stake in the current confrontation between the president and “the Squad.”

As always in such fights, the battle is not being fought on the clear and solid ground we’d all prefer. Trump himself deliberately picked this murky ground. He knows that a great number of Americans in both parties have little sympathy for the Squad, and for all kinds of reasons, ranging from simple racism, Islamophobia and misogyny, to genuine policy disagreements, to unhappiness with the bigotry and insensitivity that members of the Squad have themselves sometimes displayed. Almost everyone has a reason to temper their support. Professional Republicans are silent because they fear their voters; professional Democrats are still angry at the Squad for challenging House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). Many are inclined to declare a pox on both their houses — they deserve each other.

Yet, somehow, he says we’re all part of The Squad now.

Unfortunately, we don’t have the luxury of equivocation. Trump has given us a binary choice: Either stand with American principles, which in this case means standing in defense of the Squad, or equivocate, which means standing with Trump and white nationalism. It doesn’t matter how you feel about Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.). The truth is, they have done nothing and said nothing about the United States or about an ally (in this case, Israel) that has not been done or said thousands of times. When politicians were denouncing “hyphenated” Americans during World War I, German and Irish Americans were not only denouncing their government. Some were actively working for the German government, engaging in sabotage and espionage, often supported by funds paid through the German Embassy in Washington. Yet even that did not justify a national assault on “hyphenated” Americans.

See, it’s cool to slur America and Israel because lots of Leftists have done it before! Except, now, these are four elected members of the United States Congress (along with some other comrades) who are blatantly doing it.

Our nation won’t be undermined by anything the Squad has said or done. It will be undermined if we don’t fight back against this assault on our universal principles. Disagree with the Squad, refute them, argue with them, vote against them. But also defend them, as the founders intended. The essence of our nation is at stake.

At stake! Well, yes, from the very Squad in question, with their ultra hardcore beliefs to radically change America

I Went to a Socialism Conference. Here Are 6 Shocking Things I Learned.
What’s clear from my observations at Socialism 2019 is that traditional Marxists have successfully melded their ideology with the identity politics and culture war issues that animate modern liberalism—despite still being quite far from the beliefs of the average citizen.

Jarret Stepman attended the conference in Chicago over the 4th of July weekend, and, wowzer, what he learned. Such as

Most of the conference attendees appeared to be white, but identity politics were a major theme throughout—especially in regard to gender.

I’ll let you read the majority, worth the 5-10 minutes, but, here are the 6 things he learned (below the fold)

Read More »

Read: We Are “The Squad” Now Or Something, So Let’s Go Inside A Socialism Conference »

Hot Take: Democrats Invoke Ronald Reagan To Push Illegal Immigration

Seriously

They’re really giving this a shot to protect illegals

Since this is the last speech that I will give as President, I think it’s fitting to leave one final thought, an observation about a country which I love. It was stated best in a letter I received not long ago. A man wrote me and said:

“You can go to live in France, but you cannot become a Frenchman. You can go to live in Germany or Turkey or Japan, but you cannot become a German, a Turk, or Japanese. But anyone, from any corner of the Earth, can come to live in America and become an American.”

Yes, the torch of Lady Liberty symbolizes our freedom and represents our heritage, the compact with our parents, our grandparents, and our ancestors. It is that lady who gives us our great and special place in the world. For it’s the great life force of each generation of new Americans that guarantees that America’s triumph shall continue unsurpassed into the next century and beyond. Other countries may seek to compete with us; but in one vital area, as a beacon of freedom and opportunity that draws the people of the world, no country on earth comes close.

The thing is, The Gipper was talking about legal immigrants

A number of years ago, an American student traveling in Europe took an East German ship across the Baltic Sea. One of the ship’s crew members from East Germany, a man in his sixties, struck up a conversation with the American student. After a while the student asked the man how he had learned such good English. And the man explained that he had once lived in America.

He said that for over a year he had worked as a farmer in Oklahoma and California, that he had planted tomatoes and picked ripe melons. It was, the man said, the happiest time of his life.

Well, the student, who had seen the awful conditions behind the Iron Curtain, blurted out the question, “Well, why did you ever leave?” … “I had to,” he said, “the war ended.” The man had been in America as a German prisoner of war.

Those conditions behind the Iron Curtain are what the Democrats are trying to create. Reagan was very much for legal immigration, and wanted people to be able to come in and out of the country to visit and work. The problem is, Democrats keep giving incentives so that people come illegally as well as come legally and never leave.

(Washington Post) Several influential Hispanic leaders, meanwhile, sounded an unexpected alarm, warning that Democratic candidates are risking moving too far left in their quest to woo Hispanic voters.

“I think there has to be some moderation. I disagree with the candidates’ positions about providing health care to undocumented immigrants, when you have Americans who don’t have health care,” said Domingo Garcia, president of the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), which held its convention here. “I think that was a snap decision by some of those candidates that wasn’t thought through.”

Cecilia Muñoz, a White House aide to President Barack Obama and a former policy advocate at the National Council of La Raza, a Latino advocacy group now known as UnidosUS, said decriminalizing unapproved border crossings would make it harder for Democrats to combat President Trump’s populist appeal.

“It allows him to make a claim that he is already making, which is Democrats are for an open border,” she said. “And it makes it harder to explain why that is not true.” She added that stopping family separations at the border doesn’t require making the crossings civil offenses.

That’s what they want, though. So, they have to attempt to use Reagan to push their extremist agenda.

Read: Hot Take: Democrats Invoke Ronald Reagan To Push Illegal Immigration »

If All You See…

…is a carbon intensive dog causing desertification, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is American Elephants, with a post on Elizabeth Warren being a very bad idea.

Read: If All You See… »

Pirate's Cove