AOC Explains That Impeachment Is About Defeating Trump In 2020

This isn’t really surprising, though, as we all know that this whole thing is the Democrats Trump Derangement Syndrome going back to when they were calling for Trump to be impeached as soon as he won the election. It’s just an extension of Russia Russia Russia.

AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.” (snip)

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”

She concluded, “We also need to move quite quickly because we’re talking about the potential compromise of the 2020 elections. And so this is not just about something that has occurred; this is about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Interesting. Democrats have been saying for years that they wanted to stop outside interference in our elections (not going to happen. We interfere in the elections of other nations, they interfere in ours, welcome to the world, Dems) and wanted to get to the heart of what happened in 2016. Well, Trump was trying to find out what happened. And Ukraine was a central player. Why is it only OK to investigate Trump and his team? When will we get the investigations into the Obama administration spying on presidential candidate Donald Trump and his campaign, then on president-elect Donald Trump and his team?

But, anyone, per AOC, this whole impeachment theater is about damaging Trump for the 2020 elections, essentially using a very serious measure in the U.S. Constitution to attempt to change the outcome of the election. We all know this, she’s just letting the cat out of the bag.

Seriously, impeachment theater was pretty bad on day 1

When your main witnesses on day 1 were actually not witnesses, good luck!

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

13 Responses to “AOC Explains That Impeachment Is About Defeating Trump In 2020”

  1. Doom and Gloom says:

    Hold on to your hats.

    The Whistleblower was recruited from YALE and when he was he was marching in the streets on behalf of the MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD. He was brought into the White House, handpicked by The NSA with very limited knowledge of the Ukraine to be their go to guy on the Ukraine and Russia, according to ex CIA official who is not anonymous but on record with his face exposed detailing information about this guy.

    Don’t be shocked. HRC’s main adviser worked for the Muslim Brotherhood as did her mother. You remember the woman married to Anthony Weiner to gain inside power.

    This Whistle Blower was: A radical far left wing activist which would certainly fit a pattern that is emerging from the CIA and NSC.

    This in a nutshell is your Whistle blower. Now its pretty clear what Obama meant when he told his supporters after Trump was elected. Don’t worry I have assets in place to prevent Trump from doing harm to the country. (Paraphrasing here since his quote has been scrubbed from the radical leftist search engines).

    He does not fit the actual Criteria of a Whistle bower. He is NOT A WHISTLE BLOWER NOR DOES HE FIT THE CRITERIA OF ONE. He simply despises the president and disagreed with his policies.

    This is so egregious, that it is certainly an attempted coup to overthrow the president of the United States to protect dozens of high level people including ex elected officials.

    • Doom and Gloom says:

      Remember Schiff says the whistleblower will not testify. This goes against the very foundation of the Constitution. To be able to face your accuser.

      They know this guy will be picked apart and destroyed on LIVE TV. He does not fit any of the criteria of a whistle blower.

      According to TAF, in order to qualify as a whistleblower under the False Claims Act, certain conditions must be met, including: The whistleblower should have actual knowledge of the fraud, not just a suspicion. The whistleblower should be able to provide hard evidence of the fraud, such as emails and other documentation.

      And voilla this guy has none of this. that is why he bypassed the chain of command and went Straight to Adam Schiff and hired a lawyer. So Egregious in every imaginable way.

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Note: The Sixth Amendment applies to criminal prosecutions.

        Amendment VI
        In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

        Should Congressional Dems have the right to question all the witnesses they wish? Bolton? Mulvaney? Rick Perry? Giuliani? Eisenberg, Blair, Ellis and McCormack? Michael Duffey and Russell Vought? A number of Key officials are refusing to or being told not to testify.

        Consistent with Intelligence Community Whistleblower Statute procedures, the whistleblower submitted their complaint to the Inspector General (Michael Atkinson), who in this case determined that the allegations were credible and of “urgent concern.”

        IG Atkinson properly passed the complaint to acting DNI Joseph McGuire who is required to contact Congress within 7 days. In consultation with the DOJ, McGuire determined he didn’t have to notify Congress.

        Clearly the whistleblower and IG were correct to be concerned as evidenced by the President’s telephone call and subsequent information. Even if trump has the whistleblower murdered, or Gym Jordan wrestles him to the floor, the case will go forward based on the evidence. There is no question that trump tried to bribe President Zelensky to at least announce a corruption investigation of trump’s likely chief opponent. The question is whether these are impeachable acts.

        • formwiz says:

          Should Congressional Dems have the right to question all the witnesses they wish?

          Maybe if the whole thing wasn’t such a laughable farce and an assault on due process. Most of these people have access to classified info that an Administration wouldn’t want made public, thus the invocation of executive privilege.

          Clearly the whistleblower and IG were correct to be concerned as evidenced by the President’s telephone call and subsequent information.

          No, because, as yet, no one has come up with a crime, high or otherwise, demeanor, miss or otherwise, that applies here and it’s become so patently obvious they’d like as many “witnesses” as possible since the ones who supposedly knew all about this didn’t.

          Even if trump has the whistleblower murdered, or Gym Jordan wrestles him to the floor, the case will go forward based on the evidence.

          They would still have to find some, so it looks like this is all going nowhere.

          There is no question that trump tried to bribe President Zelensky to at least announce a corruption investigation of trump’s likely chief opponent.

          If so, why couldn’t Kent and Taylor say so? They supposedly are the “star” witnesses, they’re the ones in the know. Yet, when asked, they drew a blank.

          And there was already a corruption investigation. Gropin’ Joe tried to shut it down.

          The question is whether these are impeachable acts.

          No question at all. They aren’t.

        • Doom and Gloom says:

          Deflecting the main issue. He is not a whistleblower and therefore is not afforded the protections of a whistleblower. He does not have any of the pertinent information that gives him protections.

          Secondly he went to Schiff first. Before going to the DNI. A clear violation.

          I ask you Elwood why should the whistleblower not testify?

          The left is using deception just like this:::::::

          However, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer blocked the Affordable Prescriptions for Patients Act because he thinks it doesn’t go far enough.

          The objection runs contrary to opinions by members of Sen. Schumer’s own party such as Sen. Richard Blumenthal. The Connecticut legislator has begged Congress before to partner with Republicans, so the bill can become law.

          “If we pass this legislation, millions of Americans may no longer have to choose between food on the table, rent payments, and the medicine they need and deserve,” Blumenthal once stated. “That’s a choice no one should ever have to make.”

          WHY? BECAUSE the left won in 2018 on healthcare. IF THEY DO SOMETHING TO HELP PEOPLE IT WILL HELP TRUMP…….God forbid they help people despite politics.

          The left needs to be defeated in historic fashion for making lives miserable for their own people and then pretending it is the RIGHT and GOP causing the problems.

      • Liljeffyatemypuppy says:

        Now Schiff says he does not know the identity of the whistleblower.

        And the whimpering little sissybitch is full of shit.

        BWAHA. LOLGF

        • formwiz says:

          Full of Schiff, actually.

          And I’d like somebody to get up on the floor of the House and say his name. It’s all over the ‘Net.

          This is Baghdad Bob stuff. Or Baghdadi Schiff.

  2. Chumpchange says:

    New York Times

    California Today
    California Today: Sexual Misconduct Claims Roil the State’s Democratic Party

    Who pray tell are they talking about?

    Well, one would be Adam Schiff among others.

    L.A. Times: Adam Schiff’s Gay Lover Makes Claims Of Abuse

    Oh no the gay lover of Schiff is a black man who was beaten up. I guess Schiff didn’t get the memo that he’s a WHITE MAN and that’s a bad thing.

    From Politifact

    We found the RUMOR posted all over Twitter, and one December 9, 2018 tweet in particular from a QAnon CONSPIRACY THEORY ACCOUNT (IGNORING OTHER TWITTER POSTS AND FOCUSING ON THIS ONE), which simply claimed the information came from “congressional sources,”

    OH NO…..SOURCES????? DID THEY SAY UNNAMED SOURCES??? SAY IT AINT SO!!!! We all know that UNNAMED SOURCES ARE ONLY RELIABLE IF THEY WORK FOR DEMOCRATS……. was picked up and retweeted tens of thousands of times. The rumor seems have emerged as Congress worked toward the bipartisan passage of a bill that requires members to pay their own sex misconduct settlements.

    What. No. The house has a slush fund. STAND BY FOR MORE CONSPIRACY THEORIES….This fund is used to pay of bitches and whores who don’t like being treated like Muslim women or gays in the middle east. Say it ain’t so!!! Please. Say it ain’t so!

    Schiff is a vile plague on the house of representatives and he is in charge of investigating Trump. Who boy, what next. Perhaps they will grant him sainthood if he gives a speech and shouts how dare you to accuse a gay man of sexual harassment!!!!

    • John says:

      The GOP in 2016 elected 3 House Reps who were under federal indictment
      Beat that with a stick

    • John says:

      I would strongly suggest that you do more research on this
      Try Snopes
      Do you tank Breitbsrt is covering this up also?
      Or do you know they have already determined this to be fantasy

  3. John says:

    Mexico will not pay for the wall if it is so poorly built you can cut though it with a cordless sawsall

Pirate's Cove