Gang Of 8 Amnesty Bill Runs Into Problems With Back Taxes, Border Security

Quick, when you think of the Marco Rubio radio commercials, constantly broadcast on talk radio and TV, does the phrase “pay back taxes” come to mind? It shouldn’t, because Amnestyites have dropped any sort of tough posture from the bill, and Rubio has moderated his language just to say “pay taxes”

(Politico) The question of whether lawmakers should force immigrants to ante up what they owe Uncle Sam on any money they were paid off the books might seem easy at first.

After all, it was one of the Gang of Eight’s main talking points when it unveiled the immigration blueprint in January. Sponsors vowed that their proposal would include a back tax requirement to ward off critics’ claims that their bill would be “amnesty.” Citizenship would come with a price, they said.

But the gang has all but dropped that talking point. The immigration legislation currently moving through the Senate includes a scaled-back provision that relies almost entirely on immigrants coming forward to the Internal Revenue Service voluntarily. Critics call it “toothless.”

It is mostly toothless. The language of the bill leaves all the power of making the rules to collect from those who feel like it in the hands of the IRS. Usually, one can count on the IRS being the only agency that works really hard to collect, but, as we’ve seen, they’ve become pretty darn prone to hyper-partisan political manipulation.

Schumer also argued that a strong back tax requirement could deter immigrants from coming out of the shadows but said that the group would try to come up with some sort of compromise on the floor.

Yeah, the “compromise” was to leave it up to the Illegals, but somehow The Politico puts the burden of not getting something done on the Republicans if they dare to push for tougher measures. Then there’s the border security part

The Gang of Eight’s hopes for a Senate supermajority is running into the GOP’s push for a dramatic crackdown on border security — testing the limits of the bipartisan coalition that’s propelling the bill through Congress.

With Congress back this week to work on the measure, Senate negotiators want to pick up as many as two dozen Republican votes in a show of force that compels the House to act. But the result has to be much stricter than the current version of the bill to give it any hope of passing there either. They’ve got to do it without alienating the vast majority of Senate Democrats who like the bill as it is.

And whatever happens, it has to keep Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) satisfied.

Rubio, a key member of the Gang of Eight, is shopping around a proposal to have Congress — not the Department of Homeland Security — write the border control strategy that would be a prerequisite for most of the other elements of reform. Rubio hasn’t yet landed on specific parameters, but, arguing that Americans don’t trust their government to get it right, Rubio wants lawmakers to craft the plan at the outset, rather than leave the details up to the Obama administration.

Sorry, Marco, but having Congress write the border control strategy isn’t much better than having DHS write it….wait, you missed that border security has been vastly watered down, too?

Under the bill passed by the Judiciary Committee, unauthorized immigrants could not transition into a probationary legal status until DHS has laid out a strategy for the Southern border. And most of those immigrants would not be allowed to apply for green cards until several security benchmarks — such as implementation of a system for employers to check workers’ immigration status and an electronic exit system at major airports and ports of entry — are met over the next decade.

Remember when the border had to be secure? Rubio told and tells us this time and again, ad nauseum. Now they get probabtionary status just by DHS coming up with a strategy. What if the strategy is “hey, it’s good! Things are fine.”? The security measures will surely be weakened further, or be no more than token measures. Others will be ignored. All in the name of creating more Democrat voters quickly.

Remember this op-ed by Rubio?

There are also far-left activist groups that see citizenship for illegal immigrants as a “civil right” and will push to water down border security and enforcement measures that are critical to reform’s long-term success. These groups view immigration reform as something that should quickly legalize as many people as possible. That idea—which is manifest throughout the current administration—has done more to poison the well of immigration reform than anything that restrictionist groups could ever manage on their own.

Well, the Leftists in the Senate have already watered it down. Many Republicans on the Gang Of 8 have helped. Rubio is the face of this crap-sandwich. Now the GOP will be blamed and demonized for attempting to strengthen it.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Gang Of 8 Amnesty Bill Runs Into Problems With Back Taxes, Border Security »

Is It CFCs, Not CO2, That Caused This Warm Period?

Obviously, I’m not a scientist. I’ve never claimed to be. But, that’s OK, because this whole “climate change” issue is mostly a political one, not a scientific one. I can get into the science, but I do not go as deep as, say, Anthony Watts or Dr. Roy Spencer. So, I’ve been trying to work my way through the new study that says it is CFCs that have driven warming, not CO2

(Daily Caller) Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) — not carbon emissions — are the real culprit behind global warming, claims a new study out of the University of Waterloo.

“Conventional thinking says that the emission of human-made non-CFC gases such as carbon dioxide has mainly contributed to global warming. But we have observed data going back to the Industrial Revolution that convincingly shows that conventional understanding is wrong,” said Qing-Bin Lu, a science professor at the University of Waterloo and author of the study.

“In fact, the data shows that CFCs conspiring with cosmic rays caused both the polar ozone hole and global warming,” Lu said.

The DC article is mirrored by lots and lots, searching Google News. Switching to the “study” link above

The findings are based on in-depth statistical analyses of observed data from 1850 up to the present time, Professor Lu’s cosmic-ray-driven electron-reaction (CRE) theory of ozone depletion and his previous research into Antarctic ozone depletion and global surface temperatures.

Now, over at Climate Depot, Marc Morano is linking to an article by The NO CARBON Tax blog saying the game is up, CO2 is innocent. Well, yeah, it is mostly innocent. But, let’s consider: the study is only discussing CFCs and warming since the 1970’s. What about the warming before than? Of course, Warmists themselves like to limit themselves to only the warming since the late 1970’s, as well (except when it suits their discourse). But, then the paper flips around discussing warming since 1850 (the end of the Little Ice Age) and 1950 and other dates. Which is it?

Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are to blame for global warming since the 1970s and not carbon dioxide, according to new research from the University of Waterloo published in the International Journal of Modern Physics B this week.

That’s the first paragraph of the Waterloo News article (can’t get into the actual study, not a member). So, which is it? The study seems to be saying that something caused the warming since 1850, but that CFCs controlled the temperature since the late 1970’s,

By proving the link between CFCs, ozone depletion and temperature changes in the Antarctic, Professor Lu was able to draw almost perfect correlation between rising global surface temperatures and CFCs in the atmosphere.

Certainly, CFCs are a much more potent GHG than CO2, and ozone depletion was a danger.

But, what of the explosion of CFC usage from the late 1800’s on? They were heavily used in devices to extinguish fires starting in the late 1880’s on, spreading to many other uses, such as with air conditioning, refrigerators, medicinal aerosols, blowing agents, solvents, cleaners, and degreasing agents, among others. The use of CFCs explode in the mid-1900’s, yet the Earth saw flat or reducing temperatures from the 1940’s through late 1970’s. Was it simply a case of there not being enough in the atmosphere to make a difference? Perhaps the study discusses this. It’s not in the abstract.

Many CFCs have been banned from usage since the late 1970’s, with the big bans starting worldwide in the mid to late 1990’s, so there is some correlation between CFC usage and global temperatures, and could certainly explain warmer temps in many 1st World nations, such as the US. But, it does not track perfectly, and needs more study. Is it causality or anecdotal? Is it coincidental or the anthropogenic precipitor? The article discusses correlation. But, is it definitive proof? I’ll be the first to tell you that not all anthropogenic causes can be discounted, as I’ve said time and again.

Finally, it is interesting that the authors do not immediately discount the effects of the Sun and solar wind, including the natural properties and saying that they are part of the warming equation, and not just as how they effect the CFCs.

Read: Is It CFCs, Not CO2, That Caused This Warm Period? »

Watcha Reading?

reading

I finished Clone Hunter by Victor Methos, excellent, excellent book. 4 1/2 Pirate Flags out of 5. Hoping there will be a follow up.

Deep into Under Foot (Outside Context Problem) by Christopher Nuttall, the 2nd book in the series. I’m finding it a bit better than the first, where the United States is under the foot of the alien invaders and having to deal with all sorts of Quislings. Not even close to being done, it’s 489 pages.

I’ve also been slowly reading The Mad, Mad, Mad World Of Climatism. I’ll provide a write up once I finally finish, but, let me say that this should be the one book that every Warmist, and those on the fences, should read. Heck, even if you do not buy into “climate change”, you should read it. The facts and figures, along with the history, of “climate change” is put in an excellent format that anyone can easily understand.

Read: Watcha Reading? »

Anthropomorphic Globull Warming?

Back during centuries and millennia past humans used to blame witches and gods for bad weather. Today’s Warmists have gone further in think the weather is a living being (via Tom Nelson, who provided that part in italics)

“There’s now rather convincing evidence [like what, specifically?] that climate change has brought about, if not more frequent, at least more vehement expressions from nature, and that we should be prepared for this,” UN Deputy Secretary General Jan Eliasson said at the conference.

Read: Anthropomorphic Globull Warming? »

If All You See…

…is a horrible fossil fueled vehicle making it so hot it snows, you might just be a New Climate Denier

The blog of the day is Nice Deb, with a great post on what should happen to Eric Holder, per Judge Jeanine Pirro.

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Happy Sunday! Another gorgeous day to remember the once and future nation of America. Let’s say a prayer for all our fellow citizens who’ve been affected by the severe storms and tornadoes. This pinup is by Gil Elvgren, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. protein wisdom notes that suddenly a few rogue IRS agents became 88
  2. Ice Age Now covers the coldest UK spring in 50 years
  3. Not really a blog, but Science Daily has info on Hubble capturing the result of a galactic collision. Geeky cool!
  4. Wake Up America covers the Obama legacy of Americans giving up citizenship
  5. Victory Girls discusses Common Core
  6. The Lonely Conservative points out that the EPA is killing people with their regs
  7. Sister Toldjah (phineas) notices issues with the Ohio voter rolls
  8. Sentry Journal discusses why the Left hates the Founding Fathers
  9. Rhymes With Right features a profile in hypocrisy
  10. Right Truth notices that the happiness index plunged for a few Hopenchange groups
  11. Right Wing News covers Marco “Amnesty” Rubio getting hammered
  12. Legal Insurrection notices that Occupiers like bombs
  13. Joshua Pundit features Russia sending high end jets to Syria
  14. Hotair Pundit has more insanity from MSNBC’s Melissa Harris-Perry
  15. And last, but not least, Gay Patriot features Eric Holder promising not to spy anymore.

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts

6pm: added a few more in bold

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

The posts do take a long time, so, if you want to send me your links for Rule 5 babeage or links, use ye olde email in the header bar (remove the NOSPAM part). Preferably, create the html link so I can copy and paste how you want it to read.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

NY Times: Holder Won’t Leave Because That Might Embolden Obama’s Critics

What this all shows is that Obama and his top people are more concerned with politics than doing what is right. The original headline, per the URL and the webpage header was “Goals to fulfill and foes to foil keep Holder going, changed to

Seeking a Fresh Start, Holder Finds a Fresh Set of Troubles

Over the course of four and a half years, no other member of President Obama’s cabinet has been at the center of so many polarizing episodes or the target of so much criticism. While the White House publicly backed Mr. Holder as he tried to smooth over the latest uproar amid new speculation about his future, some in the West Wing privately tell associates they wish he would step down, viewing him as politically maladroit. But the latest attacks may stiffen the administration’s resistance in the near term to a change for fear of emboldening critics.

The White House views the attacks on Mr. Holder as a “political agenda” and “would not hasten the departure of someone who’s competent and runs the department and is a friend because there’s a drumbeat,” said William M. Daley, a former White House chief of staff under Mr. Obama. “Whoever Barack Obama puts in there, these people will try to drumbeat him out of there, no matter what.”

Well, if they run guns to Mexico and the program results in the deaths of American and Mexican citizens, well, yes, we would try and run him out.

If he intentionally targets members of the media in a manner beyond anything ever done, then lies about it, yeah.

If his department says that people who criticize Islam, engaging in Free Speech, can be charged with “civil rights violations”, yeah.

When he and his department attempt cover ups on multiple fronts, including Fast and Furious, voter fraud, prosecutorial misconduct, when he is found in contempt of Congress, when he doesn’t seem to bother with the Constitution, and when he doesn’t seem to know anything that is going on, well, yeah.

But that does not mitigate the frustration of some presidential aides. “The White House is apoplectic about him, and has been for a long time,” said a Democratic former government official who did not want to be identified while talking about friends.

Some advisers to Mr. Obama believe that Mr. Holder does not manage or foresee problems, the former official said. “How hard would it be to anticipate that The A.P. would be unhappy?” the former official said. “And then they haven’t defended their position.”

Oh, but they have defended the position, in the same way that the other administration officials had, by claiming ignorance and uninvolvement. It’s what Mark Steyn calls the “Lois Lerner Defense“. Mark writes that you should try it with the IRS if they come calling. Better yet, try it with your boss if you’re ever called on the carpet, or even just asked to provide some information. “I don’t know“. “I can’t recall”. “I don’t have that information”. “I’m not sure”. “I was not the person involved”. And then consider that this is the person in charge of the entire Department Of Justice.

Under his leadership, the department scaled back a voter-intimidation lawsuit from the Bush era involving the New Black Panther Party, a decision that conservatives used to portray the black-nationalist fringe group as a political ally of the Obama administration. He reopened criminal investigations into the Central Intelligence Agency’s interrogations of terrorism suspects and tried to prosecute five men accused of plotting the Sept. 11 attacks in civilian courts rather than military tribunals, which provoked accusations that he was soft on terrorism. And he abandoned the legal defense of a law barring federal recognition of same-sex marriage that social conservatives viewed as a bulwark against attacks on the traditional family.

Despite the NY Times writers putting it in an anti-conservative manner, Holder is the Attorney General, and has certain duties, of which the above shows a profound lack of caring about The Law. Fortunately, you know, raaaaacism, per the comments

psk – From main-stream to lame-stream to blame-stream: how the American media (and certain members of Congress) refuse to respect African-American leaders and/or give them the benefit of the doubt.

Liberals are more concerned with politics and political power than with a trustworthy government that follows the law and Constitution, so find ways to change the topic.

That all said, keeping Holder around “emboldens Obama’s critics” even more than getting rid of him. Obama could choose to bring in a new AG who’s interested in following the law and Constitution.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: NY Times: Holder Won’t Leave Because That Might Embolden Obama’s Critics »

Minor Budget Cuts And Hotcoldwetdry Doom America This Hurricane Season

Like, super duper doomed!!!!!1!!!!, per Soros funded Climate Progress

How Climate Change And Budget Cuts Could Make This The Most Dangerous Hurricane Season Ever

The Atlantic hurricane season officially begins tomorrow and despite warnings of an above-average season and increasingly intense storms driven by climate change, key agencies are facing mandatory cuts that threaten their ability to prepare and protect at-risk communities.

Don’t you find it interesting that so much of Warmist propaganda syncs perfectly with the Far Left Progressive notion of bigger and bigger government and bigger and bigger spending? Add treating citizens like children who need Government to tell them what to do.

In addition, climate change is fueling more intense and destructive storms. As Kerry Emanuel, professor of atmospheric science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, explains, “Climate change is causing a greater number of intense storms. The total number of storms has remained constant, but the proportion of high-intensity events has gone steadily upward in most parts of the world. Scientific models and real-world observations both suggest that the frequency of intense storms is going up.”

Really? Not only is the US not seeing more intense hurricanes (no Cat 3 has hit the continental US since Wilma in October 2005, 2,777 days), we aren’t see them around the world. It’s been business as usual. In some cases, much less.

The National Weather Service, already cash-strapped and under scrutiny for sub-par computer modeling, will be grappling with a hiring freeze and mandatory furloughs as it heads into a potentially daunting hurricane season. The NWS office in Tallahassee, which typically has 18 meteorologists on staff, is down to 14 due to the cuts.

Oh, noes, 4 less? The horror! Must be tough looking at computers with 4 less employees.

And, of course, Superstorm Sandy is blamed on “climate change”. Warmists can’t help themselves.

Watts Up With That? has some thoughts on the current period of hurricane drought.

Read: Minor Budget Cuts And Hotcoldwetdry Doom America This Hurricane Season »

If All You See…

…is snow created by fossil fueled helicopters, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Riehl World View, with a post on Obamanomics.

Read: If All You See… »

Marshall Islands Foreign Minister: Climate Change Is Killing Us

It’s the number 1 threat or something

After a prolonged and unseasonable drought that began late last year, the severe lack of drinking water in our northern atolls led my government to declare a disaster area on May 7. This humanitarian crisis is climate-induced. About 6,000 people are affected by severe water shortages and are surviving on less than one liter of water per day. All of the affected communities have lost the staple crops that provide their daily food.

My people are not only thirsty and hungry, they are also getting sick. The drying water wells are contaminated with bacteria and salt. Diarrhea, pink eye, flu and other drought-related diseases are on the rise, particularly among children, and we are on the brink of a much wider outbreak. With no significant rain forecast until at least July, the situation is likely to get worse.

Gee, who would have thought fresh water would be so difficult on coral atolls, especially when you pollute them? But, hey, it has to be Hotcoldwetdry, right? Could not be anything else, right? So Other People have to be forced to give money and

While we struggle to respond to today’s crisis, we know that further crises lie ahead. Climate change has become the No. 1 threat to my country.

Seems like it would be to stop polluting your islands and.realize that they’re in the middle of the ocean, not the most conductive place to live.

I had really wanted to stop after the last excerpt and drop a facepalm GIF, but

In early September, we will host the 44th Pacific Islands Forum summit, bringing together leaders from the Pacific islands, Australia and New Zealand, as well as dialogue partners from many of the world’s biggest emitters of greenhouse gases, including the United States, China, the European Union, India, Japan and Canada…

So they say that “climate change” from GHGs is killing them, yet they’re going to host a conference to which people are going to take lots of fossil fueled flights?

Read: Marshall Islands Foreign Minister: Climate Change Is Killing Us »

Pirate's Cove