Climate change: Seven indisputable facts

Representative Lamar Smith pens a piece over at the Hill, smacking around Mr. Obama over his idiotic “climate change” policies and recent Alaskan photo-op, which includes 7 facts

1.     For the past 18 years, weather satellites have not measured a global increase in temperatures although carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased over that same period.  Weather satellites are the most advanced instruments for measuring global temperatures.  The fact that these satellites have not detected a measureable temperature increase despite an increased concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere calls into question the correlation climate change alarmists preach between carbon emissions and temperature.

3.     The natural cycle of global temperatures has resulted in both higher and lower temperatures over the past 1,000 years than exist today.  These temperature fluctuations occurred before significant fossil energy use.  So temperatures the Earth is experiencing now have been seen before.

4.     If implemented, the Obama administration’s Climate Action Plan would reduce global temperatures by only 0.01, or one one-hundredth of a degree Celsius.  President Obama’s former Deputy Secretary for Fossil Energy at the Department of Energy, Charles McConnell, said that EPA’s carbon rules will have only a minor impact on global climate change.  Yet regulations will cost billions of dollars and jeopardize thousands of jobs.

7.     Carbon dioxide accounts for a very small part of the Earth’s overall atmosphere and those levels have fluctuated throughout the Earth’s history. Carbon dioxide currently accounts for only .038 percent of our planet’s atmosphere. And human-made carbon dioxide only makes up about three percent of that. Put another way, if all the gases in the atmosphere were represented by the length of a football field, only the last 1/10 of an inch would be carbon emissions caused by humans. It’s hard to believe that such a small amount would supposedly have such huge consequences.

There are three more at the link. I could technically excerpt the whole thing, being from an elected official, but that would still be bad form.

Of course, facts are immaterial to th3 Cult of Climastrology, since this is all about pushing a hardcore Progressive agenda.

The EPA and other government agencies too often fail to present all the facts. Their agenda comes first, accuracy comes second.  Climate change has many explanations – and unanswered questions.  The American people need good science, not science fiction promoted by alarmists.

Calling it science fiction is an insult to science fiction. But, it’s nice to see elected officials finally acknowledging that this isn’t about science, but politics, and arguing in that manner, rather than trying to rebut sloppy, misleading, and false junk science.

Read: Climate change: Seven indisputable facts »

Never Forget. Never Surrender (Will Remain At Top For The Day)

Today marks the 14th anniversary of that dark day, when Islamic jihadis killed 2,996 of our friends, neighbors, and loved ones. Three years ago, the USA Today is wondered if 9/11 is becoming just another day, similar to Pearl Harbor Day. Based on the limited coverage by some news outlets, it may be.

People wonder why we should Remember the day in an overt fashion, unlike, say, Pearl Harbor day. Well, we defeated the Japanese within a few years. It was a different type of war. 9/11 was when we were attacked on our continent by people who will not stop anytime soon, an enemy that is not centralized by a nation, who spread according to their religious tenets.

Why should we never forget? Things like this (click the more tag)

Read More »

Read: Never Forget. Never Surrender (Will Remain At Top For The Day) »

GOP Supposedly Aiming To Make Democrats Pay For Their Iran Deal Support

Thursday, idiot GOP Majority Leader Mitch McConnell attempted to hold a vote on the Iran deal, despite know that Democrats had the votes to stop the GOP from breaking the filibuster. And despite knowing that Congress has yet to receive all the relevant information per the Corker amendment from Obama, which was signed by Obama, hence, the review period cannot have even started. So, we get

Democrats Hand Victory to Obama on Iran Nuclear Deal

Senate Democrats delivered a major victory to President Obama when they blocked a Republican resolution to reject a six-nation nuclear accord with Iran on Thursday, ensuring the landmark deal will take effect without a veto showdown between Congress and the White House.

A procedural vote fell two short of the 60 needed to break a Democratic filibuster. It culminated hours of debate in the Senate and capped weeks of discord since the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China announced the agreement with Iran in July.

In NY Times World, it’s a victory for Obama when Democrats block debate on something as important as the Iran deal, which will have major negative consequences down the road.

Remember, the majority of Americans want, at a minimum, debate and an actual Yea/Nay vote on the deal. Most are against the deal, and want it killed, in almost every single poll. The least McConnell could do would be to force debate on the issue. Use the nuclear option, if Democrats refuse to debate. Will he?

GOP aims to make Democrats pay politically for Iran vote

It may be years before the political fallout of the Senate’s mostly party-line vote Thursday to preserve the Iran nuclear agreement becomes clear. But it’s already a defining campaign issue — and like the Iraq War and Obamacare votes last decade, looks likely to remain a stark dividing line in many election cycles to come.

Republicans are plotting to make Democrats pay dearly for backing an agreement the GOP argues hinges on an historic enemy of the United States playing nice. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell plans to return to the floor next week to force Democrats to take more votes Republicans say they’ll regret as soon as Iran violates the terms of the deal or sponsors terrorist attacks, which critics believe is just a matter of time.

The question is, will these be toothless and worthless sham votes, or will he find a way to force Democrats to actually debate, and take votes that put Democrats on the record with their support of the Iran deal? He’s surely thinking about this in a manner where Dems can be hit over their record during election season, when he should be thinking about a way to kill the deal.

This is a bad deal. Had a Republican president and Secretary of State negotiated it, Democrats would be 100% against it. They would be joined by a majority of Republicans, because it is a bad deal. Just for starters, the basic points of permanently eliminating Iran’s nuclear weapons program and anytime/anywhere inspections are failures. The deal only postpones Iran’s nuclear weapons ambitions, and we see that the inspections are jokes. This deal is a joke. All the Democrats who voted to block debate have the consequences, including any terrorism from the money released, on their heads.

Read: GOP Supposedly Aiming To Make Democrats Pay For Their Iran Deal Support »

How Has Terrorism Changed 14 Years Since 9.11?

CNN wonders just what has changed with Islamic terrorism since 9.11 fourteen years ago

(CNN) In the 14 years since the 9/11 attacks, the face of terrorism has changed out of recognition. To many experts, the threat of Islamist terror is in some ways greater and in some ways diminished. It is geographically more diverse and organizationally more divided, and leverages social media and the internet in a way impossible in 2001.

In the West, Islamist terrorism is often more inspired than organized and directed. Its menace is also more fluid and unpredictable than it was on that bright autumn morning in 2001, but the tools to combat it are also more plentiful, from ever more sophisticated and accurate drones to financial intelligence and algorithms for chewing terabytes of data in the pursuit of suspicious communications.

The likelihood of an attack on the scale of 9/11 has receded. but the probability of more frequent though less devastating attacks has increased.

It’s interesting that CNN even acknowledges that these attacks are being propagated by Islamic radicals.

Anyhow, there’s a bit of a scuffle between ISIS and al Qaeda, but, at the end of the day, they would cooperate to kill the infidel, and

Similarly unimaginable 14 years ago is that a jihadist group — a “nonstate actor” as the academics say — could control a huge amount of territory. Al Qaeda was the guest of the Taliban in Afghanistan, and after 9/11 was dispersed to mountain camps in Pakistan. Al-Shabaab, for a while, controlled parts of central and southern Somalia; al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb briefly held some towns in Mali.

But these groups never had the trappings of a “state” in the way ISIS has Sharia courts, basic social services and now even a currency. And any form of safe haven allows for greater and more ambitious planning.

Remember, it wasn’t that long ago when many politicians, pundits, and leftist news outlets, including Hillary Clinton, were saying that ISIS was not a state. They were also saying, including John Kerry and Barack Obama, that ISIS wasn’t Islamic.

Writing in the latest edition of the Combating Terrorism Center’s Sentinel, Morell says that “all told, some 20 countries now have terrorist groups within their borders espousing the jihadist ideology.”

And ISIS has created “provinces” beyond Syria and Iraq at warp speed.

There are countless more “no-go zones” in the world than there were on 9/11:

— Britain tells its holidaymakers to avoid Tunisia.

— Parts of Kenya and Egypt are off-limits, as is almost all of Libya.

— Boko Haram has turned much of northern Nigeria into a battlefield (as well as some areas of neighboring states.)

— Yemen was never the easiest place to navigate but has imploded in the past four years, becoming yet another theater in which al Qaeda and ISIS compete to kill the most Shiites.

And let’s not forget the cesspool of Syria, nor that these Islamists are operating in many, many Western nation, much less attempting to infiltrate and expand in many African countries. Nor that some countries, such as Turkey, are moving towards a more hardcore Islamist viewpoint.

For the most part, the jihadi attacks on the West (Europe, America, Australia primarily) are not really organized, just “inspired”, as mentioned initially. However, the Islamists are pushing harder and harder to change Western culture without firing a shot. They use out laws, constitutions, societies, and even our compassion against us, pushing Sharia law and hardcore religious beliefs. They create an environment where any complaint, no matter how minor, is considered full blown Islamophobia, hence, many, especially in government, turn a blind eye. How else to explain incidents like the Rotherham sex scandal? Anyhow, people forget that the “peaceful” ones can be just as dangerous, if not more in the long term, to our societies as the periodic jihadi attacks.

By the way, it’s fantastic the way Islamic terrorism has exploded in the era of Obama, eh?

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: How Has Terrorism Changed 14 Years Since 9.11? »

Activists Attempt To Make Racial Issue Out Of Righteous Bust

This arrest, taped on video, has apparently created “tension”, and WRAL isn’t helping

Arrest caught on camera creates tension in Roanoke Rapids

An arrest of a Roanoke Rapids woman that was caught on camera by a bystander this week has created increased tension between law enforcement officers and the community.

Alvina Michelle Moody, 25, was arrested Monday afternoon at a Dollar General and charged with possession of marijuana, possession with the intent to sell and deliver marijuana, drug paraphernalia and resisting arrest. The video of the arrest was posted on YouTube and Facebook with the caption, “police brutality.” As of Wednesday, the video had more than 30,000 views. Viewer warning: The video contains obscene language.

Deputy Chris Boden was just doing his job in arresting a criminal. Said criminal was resisting arrest. The video show him using proper restrain in detaining the perp. Of course, this created some sort of issue

Frances Smith, said she was standing nearby and witnessed the officer grab Moody’s arm behind her back. Smith, 53, of Roanoke Rapids, was one of three people arrested for obstructing the officer.

“I was only trying to help a citizen,” she said. “She was hollering and he was dragging her to the car. When he dragged her to the car, that’s when I ran back and said, ‘Sheriff, please stop beating her.'”

In other words, she was trying to create a racial situation. Instead, she was arrested for obstruction while interfering with the deputy. Many people were yelling disgusting things at a duly sworn officer of the law who was attempting to detain a person selling drugs.

Furthermore, the situation was, in fact, caught on the deputy’s body camera, given to the county prosecutor.

“With this national war against police, a deputy sheriff in Texas can’t even go gas up his vehicle without getting killed execution style, so it’s on the mind of all of our officers,” he said, referring to Deputy Darren GoForth, who was shot while filling his patrol car with gas at a station in suburban Houston on Aug. 28.

Are there bad cops out there? Ones who go over the line? Ones who make bad decisions in the heat of the moment? Sure. Welcome to life. Meanwhile, officers have to deal with scumbags and criminals day in day out, and their job is made that much harder by Left wing activists, especially the #BlackLivesMatter crew, who are targeting all police for attempting to stop criminals. Only in Liberal World.

Read: Activists Attempt To Make Racial Issue Out Of Righteous Bust »

If All You See…

…is a dolphin that will be eradicated, along with all other dolphins, from too much carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Other McCain, with a post on people being shocked that ISIS intelligence was cooked.

Read: If All You See… »

Are We Ready For The Millions Of Coming Climate Refugees? Or Something

MSNBC is trotting out a Scary Story for their minuscule viewership

Europe’s next crisis: Climate change could create millions of new refugees

Nearly 400,000 migrants have streamed into Europe this year, setting off the continent’s largest refugee crisis since World War II. But the tide of desperation is nothing compared to the flood of environmental refugees that could be created by unchecked climate change, experts and elected officials warn.

President Obama set the tone in a speech last week in Alaska, where he summoned images of “desperate refugees,” “entire industries of people who can’t practice livelihoods” and “political disruptions that could trigger conflicts around the world.” Secretary of State John Kerry dubbed them “climate refugees,” and warned of a global fight for food, water and “mere survival.”

Blah blah blah. Typical. Rather than dealing with the real issues that create floods of refugees, the Cult of Climastrology replaces the root causes with their pet beliefs. Yes, climate in all fashions has caused problems throughout the period of life on Earth. Warmists need a reason to Blame Mankind.

Just not enough to give up their own big carbon footprints.

Read: Are We Ready For The Millions Of Coming Climate Refugees? Or Something »

Warmists Want To Track Urban Emissions At Every Level

Remember, most Warmists are members of the same party and belief set that says Government should stay out of all decisions when it comes to abortion, but wants the Green Police to monitor your carbon footprint

Climate change: Track urban emissions on a human scale
Cities need to understand and manage their carbon footprint at the level of streets, buildings and communities, urge Kevin Robert Gurney and colleagues.

…..

Knowing that certain roads, types of vehicle or parts of a city dominate road emissions and why people drive at specific times would tell city planners where and how to lower emissions efficiently. Improvements in traffic congestion, air quality, pedestrian conditions, and noise pollution could be aligned. But tracking emissions road by road and building by building is beyond the capacity of most cities.

Luckily, scientists are gathering the data that city managers need — in studies that match sources of CO2 and methane with atmospheric concentrations. Now the research community needs to translate this information into a form that city managers can use. Emissions data need to be merged with socio-economic information such as income, property ownership or travel habits, and placed in software tools that can query policy options and weigh up costs and benefits. And scientists should help municipalities to raise awareness of the power of detailed emissions data in tailoring climate and development policies.

In other words, merging all our private data with that of the Cult of Climastrology so they can track everything.

Slashing emissions requires mapping them on finer scales of space and time that reflect the human dimensions at which carbon is emitted: by individual buildings, vehicles, parks, factories and power plants. These should be tracked at least yearly. Such granular estimates are needed for several reasons: to verify emissions rates; to confirm progress towards reduction and support carbon trading, permits or taxation; to enable more-targeted and financially efficient decisions about mitigation options; and to identify and fix unintentional releases from, for example, leaking gas pipes or malfunctioning methane-capture equipment in landfills.

So, once they have all that information, they can target the permits and taxation, along with all sorts of restrictions on citizens and private entities.

With detailed knowledge of carbon flows, cities might succeed in reducing global emissions where nations have failed.

One has to wonder why all these cities have such big carbon footprints, when they tend to be run by Democrats, big believers in “climate change”, and stocked with a majority of Democratic Party voters. It’s almost like they don’t really believe their talking points enough to change their own behavior.

I wonder how they’ll respond when they realize that The Government is tracking their every move, invading their privacy, then taxing them over it?

Read: Warmists Want To Track Urban Emissions At Every Level »

Hillary Clinton Totally Eager To Defend Her Record At State

No, not that record regarding her email shenanigans, what with the private server and sending/receiving confidential/sensitive/Secret material. The one where she supposedly Did Something

(The Hill) Hillary Clinton’s Iran speech on Wednesday isn’t a one-time event timed for votes this week on Capitol Hill, the Democratic presidential candidate’s senior aides say.

The speech, in which she outlined a five-point plan on Iran, is part of a larger strategy to use the deal — and the upcoming vote — as a window for telling her story of her four-year tenure as Secretary of State.

But those big meanie Republicans are out their exposing her true record

But Clinton is “eager” to have the debate, according to Jake Sullivan, a foreign policy adviser on the Clinton campaign who worked for her as a senior aide at the State Department.

“Every time she mixes it up with Republicans on these issues, she supplies further evidence of why she stands to prevail in that debate,” he said in an email to The Hill on Wednesday.

OK?

In her speech at the Brookings Institution, Clinton offered support for the Iran deal but also talked about how she would take a tough line with Tehran in a new Clinton administration.

Her message leaned heavily on her tenure at State, and she highlighted how she was a key player for Obama in the negotiations.

“President Obama and I pursued a two-prong strategy” of engagement and pressure, to “significantly raise the cost of Iranian defiance,” she said in the speech. “Meanwhile I traveled the world … twisting arms to help build the global coalition.”

Does it need mentioning that she and Obama completely blew off the Iranian Green Revolution? But, hey, if she wants to take some credit for the horrendous Iran deal, which the majority of Americans are against, go for it!

Clinton also offered comments about how she would offer strenuous military support to Israel, where the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has loudly criticized the deal. This offered Clinton a chance to stand apart from Obama.

So, something she says she will do, which she didn’t do while Obama was president.

In a conference call after the speech on Wednesday, Team Clinton, former State Department colleagues, and foreign policy experts aimed to further break down the former secretary of State’s involvement in the deal, discussing her first trip to Moscow in 2009 and how she and her team persuaded the Russians to get “on board” with sanctions against Iran.

Sanctions Russia failed to implement themselves. More on that in a minute.

And, that’s pretty much it. Maybe she has more information at her website? Well, no. One would think she would be pimping her vast experience as Secretary of State and her time as a Senator. Negative.

In fact, Hillary and her State Dept advocated heavily against many of the sanction placed on Iran. When the sanctions were passed, State used lots of waivers to exempt many countries. Her Pacific reboot was a failure, as was her Russian reboot. Our European allies have lost quite a bit of trust in the U.S. We’ve isolated many allies, including Israel and Poland (missile shield). The Arab Spring was mostly blown off. The uprising in Egypt highlighted just how discombobulated the foreign policy was under Obama/Clinton.

She has no signature doctrine, strategy, or diplomatic triumph. She was super enthused to start a war in Libya, and then ignored what happened after, including the Benghazi fiasco. Iraq has turned into a cesspool, though that is more Obama’s fault. Syria is beyond a mess. Remember when she called Assad a “reformer”? What, exactly, can she look to as a real success? Her supporters can’t name one. Seemingly, neither can she.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Hillary Clinton Totally Eager To Defend Her Record At State »

Climate Change Will Totally Destroy The Planet’s Circulatory System Or Something

Straight out of the movie The Day After Tomorrow, yet another hyperventilating alarmist scary fable

Climate change will destroy the planet’s circulatory system

We can’t have the birds or the bees. We can’t have woolly mammoths. For the love of Gotye, even the red pandas are in danger. And if we keep releasing all these greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, soon we won’t even have water that flows in the right direction: A pair of new studies suggests that warming temperatures and melting Arctic ice sheets could have drastic effects on global ocean currents. Welcome back to Spoiler Alerts, where climate change grayscales all the Nyan Cats.

According to some research, “climate change” did help cause the extinction of the wooly mammoth. Of course, there weren’t any fossil fueled vehicles around back then, nor any of the other things Cult of Climastrology members Blame. Might it have been *GASP* natural, much like most of today’s minuscule 1.4F warming since 1850?

Part of the problem with melting ice, argues the first study, is that it’s mostly freshwater. Don’t get me wrong, I love freshwater — can’t get enough of the stuff— but cold freshwater doesn’t sink the same way cold saltwater does (because it’s not as dense). And part of what helps the currents do their job is the fact that cold water tends to sink. Any disruptions in temperature and salinity are likely to toy with that system in a severely objectionable manner. The Washington Post reports:

Blah blah blah. Realistically, the science is, in fact, sound. This has happened many times before, where changes in the oceanic circulatory systems have changed, moving from warm to cool, just like there are fluctuations from cool to warm. Earth is a very dynamic system. What it doesn’t mean is that mankind is mostly/solely responsible for the tiny warming during the Modern Warm Period.

Read: Climate Change Will Totally Destroy The Planet’s Circulatory System Or Something »

Pirate's Cove