If All You See…

…is carbon un-friendly dog, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Vulgar Curmudgeon, with a post on what comes after gun grabbers have exploited their own children.

Read: If All You See… »

It’s Your Addiction To Tasty Burgers That’s Causing Indy’s Pothole Mess

Potholes never happened before CO2 carbon pollution atmosphere cancer went above 350ppm

Letters: Climate change lies behind Indy’s pothole mess

As I swerved down the street today on my way to work, passing over some freshly patched potholes and dodging others, it occurred to me that more potholes may be, for Midwesterners, one of the most obvious signs of how changes in the climate are now affecting our daily lives.

While there are lots of reasons for potholes on our city streets, chief among them are the rapid freezing-warming-freezing patterns that have been the hallmark of Indiana’s recent winters. These conditions are the result of observable changes in Indiana’s climate that scientists predict will continue — and worsen — well into the future.

Our infrastructure has been designed and built with certain assumptions about temperature and precipitation, but facts on the ground are changing, and we need to reassess how to maintain and adapt our transportation and other systems.

One way to fix this is with a tax, and certainly for Believers to give up their own use of fossil fuels and make their lives carbon neutral to stop Cold Weather. Oh, wait

One way to help Indiana communities prepare for the future is to create more robust, relevant and accessible information about how decisions made today are likely to be affected by environmental change in the years ahead.

Nope, more about indoctrination. Can’t expect Warmists to practice what they preach, right?

Indianapolis’ pothole problem provides a painful glimpse into the enormous economic burdens that could result from environmental change. But with concerted and collaborative efforts, we can begin to address these problems, leading to a smoother path forward in every sense.

Wait, I thought this was happening now? No? It’s in the future?

Seriously, these people always find something. But, really, the whole point here is to get people to identify little things with man-caused climate change/global warming in everything they see and do, thereby scaring them into acting on this unscientific cult belief.

Read: It’s Your Addiction To Tasty Burgers That’s Causing Indy’s Pothole Mess »

OMG: Republicans Want To Cut Taxes Again And Let You Keep More Of Your Own Money!

This is horrible. Horrific. Terrible. Abominable. Dreadful. Appalling. Gruesome. So says the Washington Post’s Excitable Catherine Rampell

Get ready. Republicans want to cut taxes again.

Just months ago, Republicans got away with a massive upward redistribution of wealth, raiding $1.5 trillion from the Treasury and sticking future generations with the bill.

Now, they’re going for more.

On Wednesday, President Trump touted his ginormous, sloppily drafted, deficit-financed tax cuts, written under cover of night without benefit of hearings or experts. The whole thing was so much fun, he said, that he hopes to do it all again.

This year.

“We’re actually going for a phase two which will help — in addition to middle class, it will help companies and it’s going to be something I think very special,” Trump said in Missouri. “Kevin Brady is working on it with me, Congress is working, the Senate’s working.”

Brady (R-Tex.), the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, confirmed another tax-cut bill was in the works.

“We think even more can be done,” he gushed on Fox Business News.

Yeah, Catherine isn’t excited about citizens keeping more of the money they earned, because, Democrats believe that your money is actually Government’s money to spend.

The problem for Republicans, of course, is that at this point, tax cuts are the only thing they stand for. As conservative commentator Robert Novak once put it, “God put the Republicans on Earth to cut taxes. If they don’t cut taxes, they have no overriding rationale for existence.”

Well, I suppose that standing for making sure citizens keep more of the money they work hard for isn’t quite as great as making sure unborn babies can have metal objects stuck in their heads then be suctioned out of a womb by a vacuum, the number one sacrament of Democrats. Because abortion on demand is what Democrats are on Earth for.

Oh, and arguing against citizens having more of their own money to spend.

Read: OMG: Republicans Want To Cut Taxes Again And Let You Keep More Of Your Own Money! »

Illegal Alien “Activist” Claims Deportation Action Is Political

Could it be political?

(King5) An immigration judge Thursday gave the government until early next month to respond to the allegations of an immigrant-rights advocate who says she’s been targeted for deportation because of her political activism.

Dozens of supporters greeted Maru Mora-Villalpando, 47, as she arrived outside a downtown Seattle building for her first deportation hearing.

A Mexico City native who overstayed a visa issued in 1996, Mora-Villalpando says she has had no convictions or contacts with police that might normally trigger deportation proceedings. But in December, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement sent her a notice to appear in immigration court.

An officer’s report in her case said she came to the agency’s attention because she discussed her unlawful status in a newspaper interview last year. The report also cited her “extensive involvement with anti-ICE protests and Latino advocacy programs.”

She cited that statement in a motion filed Monday arguing that the proceedings should be dismissed as a violation of her free-speech rights. An attorney for the Justice Department, Brent Campbell, told U.S. Immigration Judge Brett Parchert that the government would oppose that motion, and Parchert gave him until April 9 to file a written response.

Well, yes, it definitely could be political, but, it’s her own politics to blame. If this person who is in the United States in contradiction of federal law, by definition an illegal alien, wouldn’t have constantly opened up her mouth she might not have ended up on ICE’s radar. Because they need no other reason to deport her other than her being illegally present in the United States. If you’re a criminal, is it a good idea to broadcast to the police? If you’re dealing marijuana, should you get your car wrapped saying you sell marijuana illegally?

ICE has repeatedly denied targeting anyone for political reasons and called such allegations “irresponsible, speculative and inaccurate.”

Pro-immigration advocates around the country have cited other cases, including deportation proceedings against Eliseo Jurado, the husband of an immigrant activist in Boulder, Colorado, who sought sanctuary from deportation in a church, and Ravi Ragbir, a citizen of Trinidad and Tobago who leads the New Sanctuary Coalition of New York City.

It’s the exact same thing: if you’re an illegal alien, do not do things that broadcast to ICE that you’re illegal. Being here illegally is already on them: so is broadcasting it.

“We need to be dismantling ICE,” Mora-Villalpando told the crowd Thursday. “ICE has no oversight. ICE is not accountable to anybody.”

Illegal aliens do not get to make that determination, but, I supposed people dealing drugs would like to get anti-drug units dismantled, like the DEA. Gangs would love to get anti-gang units dismantled. People who engage in all sorts of crimes would love to see lots of law enforcement dismantled. Ms. Mora-Villalpando can go back to her home country of Mexico and complain.

But, that talking point about dismantling ICE is becoming a huge talking point by Democrats. This should play well with illegal aliens who can’t vote and the Democrat base who cares more for illegal aliens than Americans.

Read: Illegal Alien “Activist” Claims Deportation Action Is Political »

CNN: Say, Enforcing Immigration Law Is Like Jews Under Hitler

Every day, a new beclowing

(Breitbart) CNN published a news article on Wednesday evening that suggested the enforcement of federal immigration law was equivalent to the murder of six million Jews in the Holocaust.

The article, by Kyung Lah and Alberto Moya, was presented as news, not opinion. Its central premise was that a Jewish woman was inspired by memories of the Holocaust to hide illegal aliens on the run from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials (a federal crime).

CNN posted a tweet to promote the article, declaring: “A Jewish woman heard an undocumented immigrant and her two daughters were on the run from ICE. Driven by thoughts of the Holocaust, she risked her own comfort to offer them shelter.”

The “Jewish woman” in question has no particular link to the Holocaust. She was born after the war and cites no relatives as survivors. She is simply exploiting the symbolism of the Holocaust for a cause.

The implication is that ICE agents are like Nazis or Gestapo secret police ready to arrest illegal aliens for legitimate reason other than their identity. Jews in Germany and in Nazi-occupied Europe were citizens of the countries where they were arrested, and where they were murdered or deported to death camps. They had not violated immigration laws or any other laws except laws preventing them from existing.

Just typical unhinged behavior from Leftists. Who, interestingly, are often calling for the end of the Jewish state and backing murderous Palestinians.

BTW, yes, this actually does bother me. My grandparents on my mother’s side escape from Europe in the late 1930’s as the Nazi party was coming to power, seeing the writing on the wall. They were Jews.

Read: CNN: Say, Enforcing Immigration Law Is Like Jews Under Hitler »

If All You See…

…is horrible evil carbon polluting ice cream, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Other McCain, with a post on Palm Beach jihad, which is being ignored by the media.

Read: If All You See… »

Warmist Recommends Bolshevik Revolution To Stop ‘Climate Change’ (scam)

Funny how Warmists so often recommend the destruction of capitalism in favor of hard left authoritarian governmental economic systems. Here’s Jeff Sparrow at the UK Guardian

Climate change is a disaster foretold, just like the first world war

(you’ll need to read the first 2/3rds yourself for full context)

From a global perspective, the necessity to abandon fossil fuels cannot be denied. But for individual economies, change risks undermining comparative advantages.

If we don’t sell coal, says Malcolm Turnbull, our competitors will – which was, of course precisely the logic of the British fleet expansion in 1908.

The devastation of the first world war eventually engendered a wave of revolt from a populace appalled at the carnage their politicians had wrought.

Climate change has not yet spurred an equivalent of the mutinies in France or the revolution in Petrograd or the uprising in Berlin.

Yet Labor’s appalling equivocation over the Adani mine – a piece of environmental vandalism for which there can be no justification – illustrates the urgency with which we need a new and different type of politics.

The stakes could not be higher. Lamps are going out all over the natural world … and no one will ever see them lit again.

Funny, the UK Guardian wouldn’t be operating without capitalism.

As Eric Worrall points out

Perhaps pseudocryptic demands for a “new and different type of politics” is what fanatics do when they realise ordinary people have stopped listening to their ranting.

Pretty much.

Read: Warmist Recommends Bolshevik Revolution To Stop ‘Climate Change’ (scam) »

Legal Immigration Has Gone Up While Illegal Has Gone Way Down

Dallas Morning News contributor David J. Bier has an interesting article on legal vs illegal immigration at the southern border, but does miss something when he eventually takes a few shots at President Trump

Legal immigration has soared as illegal entries have dwindled

Here’s the paradox of immigration in America right now: The economy is roaring, and wages are rising, yet 2017 was another year of virtually no illegal border crossings. On average, each Border Patrol agent apprehended just 16 people all year — one every three weeks, tied for the lowest rate since World War II. This is down from when Border Patrol agents apprehended an average of 261 crossers per agent in 1996.

Where have the illegal crossers gone? Newly released statistics from the Department of State give a plausible answer: They haven’t disappeared; they’ve become legal.

The 16 apprehensions per agent in the entire year was significantly fewer than the 21 apprehensions that each agent was making in a month throughout the 1990s. This figure actually overstates the agency’s current workload because so many of today’s “apprehensions” are, in fact, asylum seekers, families and unaccompanied children who turn themselves in to the agents. (snip)

From 1996 to 2017, the number of temporary visas issued to seasonal workers on farms and other industries increased tenfold, from 23,204 to 236,695. Even while Congress has done little on other immigration issues, seasonal worker programs have gradually expanded.

Entries using these visas have increased twice as fast as the number of legal documents issued themselves, meaning that each worker is crossing back and forth legally in a way that was much less common in 1996. This is partly because an increasing share of the visas are going to Mexican workers who can easily criss-cross the border. In 1996, Mexicans made just 60 percent of all border crossing entries. In 2016, that figure was 90 percent.

Of course, these aren’t actually legal immigrants: they’re temporary workers. A person who comes to the U.S. for a two week visit, be it for work or vacation, isn’t an immigrant, either. Regardless, most of us have no problem with these temporary work visas, not when they are willing to do the work. It becomes a problem when they overstay those visa, which has increasingly become a problem, hence the reason ICE, as directed by President Trump, is focusing hard on interior immigration enforcement.

Of course, it seems we shouldn’t even bother with border security in Bier’s world

While Border Patrol has tripled its manpower and constructed a system of more than 600 miles of fences and barriers during this period, increased security is not the primary explanation for the reduction in illegal immigration. We know this because it hasn’t actually worked very well.

According to the Department of Homeland Security, the agency caught only half of the people who actually attempted to evade entry in 2014 and 2015 (i.e., not the asylum seekers or children). The best estimate by Princeton University’s Douglas Massey finds that in the 1990s, 95 percent or more border crossers eventually made it across after multiple attempts. All of the increased enforcement decreased the success rate only to 75 percent. In other words, now that the economy has rebounded, many more people ought to be attempting to sneak into the country.

Many are not trying now, thanks to the White House pushing for implementation of the U.S. laws to rid the nation of illegal aliens, for which the leftist media was very helpful in constantly posting breathless articles about how scary this is for illegals, how doomy. Which helped reduce the flow. And Trump allowing ICE, the Border Patrol, and other law enforcement to do their jobs helps.

Instead, potential undocumented border crossers have found their way into the legal system. As the number entering legally has increased, the Border Patrol’s job has become much easier. They have effectively gained control over the border for the first time since the early 1960s, with guest worker programs an important factor. America has two guest worker programs for seasonal laborers, the H-2A for agriculture and the H-2B for other industries, both created in 1986.

Wait, I thought border patrol didn’t work? No? Under Obama, things were rather different, with illegals streaming across the border. That has dipped immensely under Trump.

While anti-immigrant groups on the right and union-founded groups on the left have fought the H-2 trends, a coalition of moderate Democrats and Republicans has defended the programs, citing solid evidence that they don’t displace U.S. workers and do increase economic growth. Trump’s businesses use both programs, and he defended the practice in a GOP primary debate in 2016.

The trends paint a compelling picture of what would happen if the administration does limit the flow: a lot more illegal immigration.

But, Trump isn’t recommending a reduction in these visas. This is conflating a reduction in actual immigrants looking for citizenship to those who actually bring something to the table, rather than bringing in lots who have few work skill. This is the way most of the 1st World countries do it.

And this is why we can’t have an adult conversation on the subjects, because Leftists always muddy the waters.

Read: Legal Immigration Has Gone Up While Illegal Has Gone Way Down »

People Protected By People With Firearms Leave Work To Protest With Kids They Want To Deny Same Proptection

Democrats are so cute when they’re pandering

(The Hill) Democratic leaders in the House and Senate exited the Capitol on Wednesday to march with and speak to students protesting gun violence to mark one month since the Parkland, Fla., school shooting.

Senior members of Democratic leadership joined other lawmakers from the House and Senate on Capitol Hill as thousands of students marched while others around the country walked out of classes or staged other protests.

Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) both spoke to the demonstrators, while other Democrats such as Sen. Richard Blumenthal (Conn.), Rep. Ted Deutch (Fla.) and Rep. Keith Ellison (Minn.) were spotted in the crowd.
“[We are] representing in Congress the students who have sacrificed so much, spoken so eloquently, commanded the attention of the nation,” Pelosi told the crowd. “We are all moved by your eloquence and fearless insistence on action to prevent gun violence.”

“Don’t give up the fight! We will win,” added Schumer.

These are all people who have, at least during the work day, armed security protecting them. And not just with handguns. There are more powerful rifles available to all the security for the various Congressional work buildings (the Capital building and the two office buildings), ones which would be considered “weapons of war”, as the current talking point goes, as they are automatic weapons, which you cannot legally own.

A large crowd of students surrounded progressive Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), whose 2016 presidential campaign was buoyed by support from younger voters. Sanders, speaking through a megaphone, thanked the students for their protest and declared that student protesters were “leading the nation” in the conversation on gun violence.

“All across this country, people are sick and tired of gun violence, and the time is now for all of us together to stand up,” Sanders said.

Un huh

He had at least three armed guards, who kept telling the kids to stay back. Why do Democrats want kids to be denied the same protection they themselves have during the place they spend the day?

Oh, and then we have this

https://twitter.com/RobProvince/status/974040381661859840

Try jumping the fence and see if it is a gun free zone.

Read: People Protected By People With Firearms Leave Work To Protest With Kids They Want To Deny Same Proptection »

Super Late If All You See…

…is a horrible street made for fossil fueled vehicles that is cracking due to carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Moonbattery, with a post on London’s nutty, free speech hating Islamist mayor.

Wrote most of this before heading to work, forgot to finish, and didn’t set it for posting at 1pm. Happy Hump Day!

Read: Super Late If All You See… »

Pirate's Cove