Gore Takes Long Fossil Fueled Flight To Scaremonger About “Rain Bombs” And “Flying Rivers”

And leaders in the Cult of Climastrology wonder why after 25+ years of spreading awareness most care about ‘climate change’ only theoretically

Climate change triggering ‘flying rivers, rain bombs’, Gore warns

Dubai: Bizarre weather such as “flying rivers” and “rain bombs” are just some of the recent effects of climate change, warned former US vice-president Al Gore at the Global Education and Skills Forum (GESF) in Dubai on Sunday.

Gore, who is the founder and chairman of The Climate Reality Project, a non-profit establishment “devoted to solving the climate crisis”, told GESF delegates global weather is becoming “extreme” and “disruptive”, mainly because of global warming.

Gore said we are using the atmosphere as an “open sewer” for “heat trapping” emissions from burning fossil fuels for our energy needs.

Well, thank goodness he took a sailing ship to Dubai, a nation whose primary industry is oil.

He described flying or atmospheric rivers as long streams of rain-bearing clouds that carry huge amounts of water vapour over long distances, ending as heavy rain bombs over a small, concentrated area. Gore said a city in California was recently hit by such weather, with the ‘river’ in the air having flown thousands of kilometres from an area in the Pacific Ocean.

Read: Gore Takes Long Fossil Fueled Flight To Scaremonger About “Rain Bombs” And “Flying Rivers” »

If All You See…

…is horrible wood building materials made from killed trees, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is This ain’t Hell…, with a post on your Sunday feel good stories.

It’s construction women week!

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Happy Sunday! Yet another great day in America. The sun is shining, the birds are singing, the Devils are doing great on their road trip. This pinup is by Rolf Armstrong, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. JoNova notes another big Green political loss in Australia
  2. Bizzy Blog covers networks forgetting to say why McCabe was fired
  3. Blazing Cat Fur discusses government spying on patriots concerned about radical Islam
  4. Creeping Sharia notes whistleblowers trying to expose child rape in Britain were silenced
  5. DaTechGuy wonders if social justice cost Mizzou in the NCAA’s
  6. Free North Carolina notes that FBI agents lying requires firing
  7. Geller Report covers some more peaceful Muslim migrants in Vienna
  8. Legal Insurrection discusses collateral damage for California’s culture war
  9. Moonbattery notes that it is now raaaaacist to deny being racist
  10. neo-neocon covers the Gina Haspel “fake, but inaccurate” torture story
  11. Pacific Pundit notes a liberal claiming that yelling at Alexa is part of #MeToo
  12. Right Wing News discusses not telling a man “no” as not being sexual assault
  13. Small Dead Animals posts on Climate Barbie
  14. The Lid covers more bombshells in the Strzok texts
  15. And last, but not least, The Other McCain discusses The Crazy State Of California

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Surprise: NY Governor Looks To Make It More Difficult For Law Abiding Citizens To Purchase Firearms

Remember, Democrats tell us they want to make it harder for criminals to purchase firearms, yet, their policies always seem to harm law abiding citizens

(NY Daily News) Gov. Cuomo wants to increase the background check waiting period for the purchase of firearms in New York to a maximum 10 days, the Daily News has learned.

“We need to do everything in our power to keep guns out of the hands of people too dangerous to have them,” a Cuomo administration official said Saturday.

Cuomo intends to make the issue a priority in the final weeks of the state budget talks with the Legislature, which are set to conclude by April 1, the administration official said.

“In light of the school shooting tragedy in Florida, the governor is seeking to make the SAFE Act, which is already the strongest gun safety law in the country, even stronger,” the Cuomo source said. “This is about the safety of New Yorkers and the safety of our children.”

Who is this going to affect? Essentially, the system should come back with a response immediately, as it is called the National Instant Criminal Background System (NICS). Instant. Under federal law, if the FBI hasn’t responded within 3 days, then the application is approved by Los Federales. States are allowed to enact their own waiting periods. That’s fine. Certain people do need a cooling off period.

But moving this out to 10 days in the worst state for gun owners in the U.S. (only D.C. is worse) smacks of just another attempt to deny law abiding citizens their Constitutional Right.

Under current law, anyone seeking to purchase a pistol, shotgun or rifle in New York must undergo a background check. That check has three possible outcomes. The first allows the purchase to proceed immediately. The second is a denial of the sale. And the third is a call for a delay in the delivery of the gun.

That delay, under current law, can last only up to three days and then the gun can be delivered to the buyer.

Cuomo will seek to push that maximum delay to 10 days. Doing so would give the FBI more opportunity to let the dealer know if they found something in the database that should kill the sale, supporters say.

How many will suddenly find themselves on that delay list? Could it end up being 100%? In fact, there’s no real evidence that waiting periods stop crime.

Meanwhile, a whole bunch of kids who are apparently super smarter with all their worldly experience are calling for more and more restrictions

“This idea is not to prevent responsible and law abiding citizens from legally obtaining their weapons,” she said, adding she’s tired of hearing gun reform framed as “a bunch of brainwashed liberals coming into our homes and stealing our guns.”

If they have to put it that way, then what they really want is to take guns away from law abiding citizens.

Read: Surprise: NY Governor Looks To Make It More Difficult For Law Abiding Citizens To Purchase Firearms »

Happy St. Patrick’s Day: Of Course We Have To Talk ‘Climate Change’ (scam)

Is anyone surprised that the Cult of Climastrology is attempting to hijack St. Patty’s day for their un-scientific views?

St. Patrick’s Day, climate change and Congress

What is America’s Irish heritage? Americans love a day that “gives” them a free pass for limitless drinking.

That free pass comes on St. Patrick’s Day and the Irish are thanked. Is this the primary Irish influence on America?

As anyone who has paid the slightest attention to Irish history or visited Ireland knows, the Irish famine devastated the land. Irish refugees flooded our country and worldwide ports, arriving in coffin ships. Sound familiar?

The potato monoculture across Ireland allowed the rapid dispersal of disease, wiping out their food source. That was also a period of shifts in the weather pattern with harsher winters.

That would be the Little Ice Age

Congressman Charlie Dent and House Speaker Paul Ryan previously enjoyed the fellowship of Washington’s Friends of Ireland luncheon. If they lifted a glass of Guinness, were they remembering that climate affects the crops people depend on to live in their own lands?

Congressman Dent should please show the wisdom painfully learned from his proud Irish heritage and join the congressional Climate Solutions Caucus. They put aside Washington blarney and work for solutions. Let the rain fall softly.

Read: Happy St. Patrick’s Day: Of Course We Have To Talk ‘Climate Change’ (scam) »

If All You See…

…is a super bright sun shining down from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Daley Gator, with a post on “diversity.”

I have one more ladies of the IDF pic left over, so, doubleshot, Raised On Hoecakes, with a post on being fined for making too much bread.

Look at those evil world killing puppies!

Read: If All You See… »

Warmists Are Super Unhappy To Base Regulations On Scientific Data

A perfect example of why I call the entire anthropogenic climate change issue political, rather than being scientific

From the link

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reportedly planning to further restrict the use of scientific evidence in rule-making. The plans are inspired by efforts championed by one of Congress’ most notorious climate science deniers, House Science, Space, and Technology Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX).

The EPA’s initiative was discussed during a closed-door meeting on March 15 at the Heritage Foundation — a Washington, D.C. think tank known for promoting climate science denial and which was instrumental in influencing Trump’s transition team — E&E News reported Friday.

If adopted, the plan would require the EPA to rely only on scientific studies where the underlying data used by the researchers is made public. The impact would be to impose a dramatic burden on EPA officials effectively limiting their ability to introduce new protections for health and the environment. (snip)

Last March, the House passed Smith’s latest legislative effort — known as the HONEST Act — that would implement the rule at the EPA requiring regulations be based on data that is public and reproducible. The bill has not gone anywhere since, however. Smith has also tried to push the initiative under the 2019 proposed budget.

Zoinks! The Cult of Climastrology really, really, really doesn’t want their data available for others to see nor attempt to reproduce the outcomes. You know, the whole Scientific Method. If you can’t reproduce it, it is not scientific. And, as far as reproducible, Think Progress yammers on about peer review and stuff. I guess they missed the article on scientists not being able to replicate studies by their peers, published by that ultra-right wing outfit the BBC.

Read: Warmists Are Super Unhappy To Base Regulations On Scientific Data »

Hot Take: Armed Teachers Will Cause More Black Kids Deaths Or Something

It’s rather difficult to determine whether you’re reading Newsweek or Salon these days, but, one has to wonder why teachers who are mostly leftists hate black kids

GIVE TEACHERS GUNS, AND MORE BLACK CHILDREN WILL DIE

In response to the growing calls for action to prevent gun violence in our schools, President Trump has proposed arming teachers to keep kids safe. I’m not alone in being alarmed and terrified at that proposal. As a black mother who has had a child killed by gun violence, I know all too well how this dangerous proposal would add to the worries of other black and brown parents, and entire communities.

My son, George Jr., was shot and killed in 2013 when he was only 20 years old. Like many Texans, his life revolved around his family, football, his horse and country music. He had finished one year of college, and we had big dreams for his future. Losing George, my only son, knocked me down to the point that I thought I’d never get back up.

Like so many black victims in our country, George’s life story was completely rewritten by the defense attorneys for his murderers. They ignored the stories shared by people who knew and loved George, and instead painted my son as a “gang member”—a mischaracterization the media was all too ready to amplify.

Amplify because most in law enforcement thought George was involved in criminal activity, and, yup, he was shot by another Black. Not a teacher. This article is written by Calandrian Simpson Kemp, a volunteer with the Texas chapter of the gun banning/grabbing group Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America

Unfortunately, this kind of bias is the rule in our country—not the exception. Black and brown children are considered more dangerous than white kids. Too often, they face the mistaken belief that they are armed when they’re not.

In classrooms, these beliefs mean that children of color are more likely to be disciplined than white peers. A report from the New York Civil Liberties Union found that 99 percent of children handcuffed in New York City public schools were black or Latino. Research from the National Women’s Law Center shows that African-American girls are more than five times more likely to face suspension and six times more likely to face expulsion than white girls. Meanwhile, only six percent of white male students receive out-of-school suspensions, compared to 20 percent of black male students. And this gap begins in preschool.

Already, students of color are being pushed out of their classrooms and losing out on the education they need to succeed after graduation. When guns are involved, this kind of bias has life or death consequences. Like it did for Tamir Rice, who was playing with a toy gun when he was shot and killed by police at just 12 years old.

If teachers are allowed to carry handguns in classrooms, Trump’s proposal will only make black and brown children like mine less safe—facing an increased risk of gun violence in the places they go to learn and grow.

Well, that’s one hell of a jump in logic. Apparently, Leftist teachers, who are typically gunphobic, have a hankering for shooting Black kids. Who knew?

Even in the face of a school shooting, arming teachers is unlikely to keep any child safe. Armed civilians are almost never successful in active shooting situations and in many instances make it harder for law enforcement to intervene. It’s not surprising that teachers overwhelmingly oppose Trump’s plan.

That’s because armed civilians are typically not armed during these shooting situations, because these active shooting situations tend to occur in gun free zones, and the armed civilians follow the law in disarming themselves in those areas.

Gun grabbing Ms. Kemp offers up some more stuff, but, really, this is a new one: giving teachers guns will mean they are popping caps into the asses of Black kids. Le sigh.

Read: Hot Take: Armed Teachers Will Cause More Black Kids Deaths Or Something »

Surprising: Illegal Alien Accused Of Vehicular Manslaughter Turns Self Into ICE

By surprising, I mean this is surprising. Most who follow illegal immigration fully expected this guy to be gone gone gone after being released on a pitiful $25,000 bond, which means it cost $2500 to be released (FYI, an article I ran into shortly after posting on this illegal stated that Colorado often releases people on low bail for the charge of vehicular homicide)

(KDVR) An undocumented immigrant charged with vehicular homicide after a fiery crash on I-70 on March 3 who bonded out of jail a week later, turned himself in to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Friday.

Ivan Zamarripa-Castaneda, 26, was in ICE custody a little before 5 p.m. Friday, FOX31 learned.

ICE said they will allow him to stay in Denver for the duration of the trial before deciding whether to deport him.

John Anderson of Lone Tree was killed after his semi collided with another vehicle and caught fire.

Of course, this means little in the case of the Denver Sheriff’s Office playing games with an ICE detainer. It’s far past time to force state, county, and local law enforcement to cooperate with ICE detainers.

That said, one has to wonder if Zamarripa-Castaneda is playing some sort of game designed to make sure he doesn’t get deported, possibly as recommended by illegal alien activists. I guess we will see.

 

Read: Surprising: Illegal Alien Accused Of Vehicular Manslaughter Turns Self Into ICE »

NY Times: Say, We Need To Do Away With This Whole Equal Protection Under The Law Thing

Here’s a super hot take from Laurie Rollitt

A Billionaire and a Nurse Shouldn’t Pay the Same Fine for Speeding

If Mark Zuckerberg and a janitor who works at Facebook’s headquarters each received a speeding ticket while driving home from work, they’d each owe the government the same amount of money. Mr. Zuckerberg wouldn’t bat an eye.

The janitor is another story.

For people living on the economic margins, even minor offenses can impose crushing financial obligations, trapping them in a cycle of debt and incarceration for nonpayment. In Ferguson, Mo., for example, a single $151 parking violation sent a black woman struggling with homelessness into a seven-year odyssey of court appearances, arrest warrants and jail time connected to her inability to pay.

Wait, wait, I think I have the answer:

.

.

.

.

Don’t commit a crime or civil violation. Don’t speed. Don’t park illegally.

There. Problem solved.

Across America, one-size-fits-all fines are the norm, which I demonstrate in an article for the University of Chicago Law Review. Where judges do have wiggle room to choose the size of a fine, mandatory minimums and maximums often tie their hands. Some states even prohibit consideration of a person’s income. And when courts are allowed to take finances into account, they frequently fail to do so.

This is because, get this, justice is supposed to be blind. Everyone is supposed to be treated equally under the law. Does it stink that a Zuckerberg could care less about a speeding ticket, while you might find it burdensome? Well, sure. But, what happens when penalties start being applied based on pretty much whim, rather than fixed Law? You might think this is great now, but then you get nailed.

Again, don’t do something illegal. Problem solved.

Of course, the screed goes on and on and on, but, I have to wonder: weren’t these same people decrying that Blacks are treated differently? Shouldn’t everyone be treated equally under the law? But, hey, you know, Progressives.

Or, people could just not break the law. Silly me.

Read: NY Times: Say, We Need To Do Away With This Whole Equal Protection Under The Law Thing »

Pirate's Cove