If All You See…

…is carbon un-friendly dog, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Vulgar Curmudgeon, with a post on what comes after gun grabbers have exploited their own children.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

20 Responses to “If All You See…”

  1. Phil says:

    Wow. This is quite the surprise.
    Thanks a ton for the link love!

  2. Jeffery says:

    Now That The Gun Grabbers Have Exploited Their Own Children, What New Low Will They Stoop To?

    Just because that astroturf bullshit yesterday was a new low for those fvcking cvnts doesn’t mean they don’t have something even scuzzier planned.

    I’ll tell you what, you thick headed motherfvckers.

    While we are all waiting to see what kind of shit you have coming up next, why don’t you all break out your dictionaries and look up the word RESOLUTE.

    MM’K?

    I’ll wait because I know some of ya are a little slow on the uptake over there.

    Ya got that now?

    Good.

    That’s what you are up against, ya commie cucksvckers.

  3. Jeffery says:

    Wow. Asswipes cursing kids that protest being shot, but no criticism of the shooter. It’s not enough that your kind slaughters innocent children. Now you even attack the survivors who object to your kind shooting them.

    Look up the word RESOLUTE.

    MM’K?

    Ya got that now?

    Good.

    That’s what you are up against, ya fascist ammosexuals.

  4. Jeffery says:

    We finally get it. But it’s complicated.

    Men need high-capacity magazine AR-15s to defend themselves from children who want men with high-capacity magazine AR-15s to stop shooting them.

    #Moron Labe

  5. Jl says:

    As I saw, if the protest would have been during after school hours, how many kids would have participated? Exactly
    Or if tomorrow, say, a Ford Explorer mows down and kills 17 children, would these same children leave school during the middle of the day to demand Ford Explorers be banned?

    • Jeffery says:

      Again, Ford Explorers are not designed to, or intended to, kill humans wholesale. Large capacity AR-15 type rifles are.

      Large capacity AR-15 type rifles toys for white men – and have an unfortunate set of characteristics that make them perfectly useful to the few white men who want to kill other humans in large numbers.

      Here’s a long, sensitively written article about a gun confiscation case. The subject made a specific threat, the police followed protocol and confiscated his 81 firearms, and the court rapidly gave them back.

      Nearly every one of our 100 million or so gun owners is responsible. How do we detect and pre-empt those that are not? We harken back to the case of Dylann Roof’s sister who made a tangential threat to protesting students who walked out AND was charged with two counts of carrying weapons in a school (a knife and pepper spray). IF she also possessed a firearm, should it be confiscated by police, at least temporarily, while a court reviewed her case?

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/after-his-family-died-he-threatened-to-kill-himself-so-the-police-took-his-guns/ar-BBKlRfC?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=edgsp

  6. Jeffery says:

    In America, every day, over 5000 Americans die. Most from old age and disease; a few from accidents; fewer still result from firearms, and only a tiny fraction from mass shootings. Yet mass shootings appear to harm the American psyche and disrupt our feeling of control more than all the other causes together. Why is that and what can we do about it, if anything?

  7. Jl says:

    That’s a good one, J. Dead is dead-If one’s is going to blame the gun then one should blame the truck. Both are inanimate objects. I saw recently where 15 teens are killed a day (which sounds way too low) while texting while driving. Cellphones weren’t made to kill, either, so do we get rid of cellphones or place the blame where it belongs, on the person?

    • Jeffery says:

      Really? You think 3000 Americans who died on 9/11 from Alzheimers, cancer, heart disease, strokes, COPD and infection had the same impact on American psyche as the 3000 who died the same day from the attacks on the WTC? Really? You’re just being silly.

      Guns are made to kill and based on that they deserve greater scrutiny than cars and cell phones, which have other uses. You’re just being silly.

      Terrorists have used autos and trucks for terrorist attacks, most famously the right-wing terrorist group run by McVeigh. In response we’ve hardened targets with fences, barriers, stricter scrutiny of bomb ingredients… We suspect if Martyr Motors manufactured a truck strictly intended for killing people gathered in groups we’d enact laws banning them, leaving Toyotas, Chevys and Fords alone. The American right would push that more Americans have access to bomb carrying trucks to fight the terrorists!

      What again is the societal benefits of high capacity magazines in semi-auto AR-15 type rifles in the hands of civilians again? And why do you accept limits on machine guns?

      • david7134 says:

        Jeff,
        Thought process is fairly stupid. Bad guys will always get a weappn. Thus any effort on restricting the rights of law abiding folks is useless. We need to take these nuts out of our society. And remember it was liberals that put crazy people in the general population. You do realize you can make a machine gun real easy with hardware materials? No, you have little knowledge.

  8. Jl says:

    You’re missing the point. Ban all the guns you want or raise the age all you want, but those who want a firearm will always be able to get one. Therefore, the best way of protection is having others armed. Just look at how few shootings there are in Chicago with relatively strict gun control laws….

    • Jeffery says:

      Why don’t crooks in the other advanced that restrict weapons have guns?

      • drowningpuppies says:

        Ahem. They do, little dumbass.

      • david7134 says:

        Jeff,
        Have you been out of the US? If you had you would know the people with guns are the bad guys. All the countries with strict gun laws ruled by the crooks.

        • Jeffery says:

          Yet, even if what you typed was true (it’s not), mass shootings are rare in other advanced nations and their homicide rates are a action of ours. (If you want to discuss John Lott’s propaganda on European mass shootings, we can.)

          That’s not to say our unfettered access to semi-auto firearms is the only reason we are more violent.

  9. Jl says:

    “The American right would push that more Americans have access to bomb carrying trucks to fight the terrorists..”. Now that’s a funny analogy, because in that instance a rifle would be the perfect tool to take out someone driving a truck. But anyway, trucks aren’t in the Constitution, the right to bear arms is.

    • Jeffery says:

      Our Supreme Court has ruled that it’s Constitutional to “infringe” the right to bear arms. Do you consider the infringement on machine guns to be Constitutional? The Constitutional was agnostic on machine guns, AR-15s, hand grenades, 30 round magazines… as if they thought common sense would prevail.

      The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, said “assault weapons with large-capacity magazines can fire more shots, faster, and thus can be more dangerous in the aggregate. Why else are they the weapons of choice in mass shootings?”

      The Supreme Court did not take the case allowing the lower court ruling supporting the ban to stand.

Bad Behavior has blocked 6199 access attempts in the last 7 days.