…is a sea that will soon rise hundreds of feet, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Last Tradition, with a post on the sham Starbucks training day.
Read: If All You See… »
…is a sea that will soon rise hundreds of feet, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Last Tradition, with a post on the sham Starbucks training day.
Read: If All You See… »
Personally, it’s a tough choice between allowing scientists with agenda muck with the data, manufacture data, spin data, and so forth, or not pushing members of the Cult of Climastrology to practice what they preach from the top down. The Sydney Morning Herald’s Ross Gittins has a different idea
The biggest mistake we’ve made on climate change
…..
The biggest mistake we’ve made is to allow our politicians to turn concern about global warming into a party-political issue, and do so merely for their own short-term advantage.
The initial motives may have been short term, but the adverse effects have been lasting. These days, for a Liberal voter to worry about climate change is to be disloyal to their party and give comfort to the enemy.
Apparently, only socialists think their grandkids will have anything to worry about. The right-thinkers among us know the only bad thing our offspring will inherit is Labor’s debt.
Global warming used not to be, shouldn’t be and doesn’t have to stay a right-versus-left issue. In Europe it’s bipartisan. Margaret Thatcher was a vocal fighter for action on climate change, and the Conservative Party is anti-denial to this day.
See, politicizing it is bad, so, hey, let’s politicize it! Thatcher may have originally been a anthropogenic climate change believer, but, as evidence came out, she became a skeptic. Funny how Ross forgets to mention that, eh? Why? Because that wouldn’t fit the Narrative.
Further, Gittins seems to be placing most of the blame on Skeptics, rather than people on the political left (who are really on the right of the political scale, in the Authoritarian models, like Fascism. In theory, Socialism and Communism are to the left, because of the limited roles of government. In practice, way to the right, bigger and strong and more centralized government) who hijacked what might have been actual science to use it to push their hardcore government control policies. This especially happened with the fall of the Soviet Union, and so many of the Commies and Commie lovers invaded and hijacked the environmental movement and started using anthropogenic global warming as their base platform.
And this has been political ever since, so you get things like this
We must take on science-deniers who insist climate change doesn’t exist. Even those in the White House. https://t.co/kTBKhKB1f8
— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) May 28, 2018
What does she mean by “take on”? So many of her Warmist comrades mean silence, jail, and even murder Skeptics. Does she feel that way? Crazy Uncle Bernie had an official policy during his run for president of “bringing climate deniers to justice.” So, even going well beyond Kamala’s threat of infringing on 1st Amendment rights.
Making the issue political was never a bug: it was a feature.
Read: Say, What’s The Biggest Mistake We’ve Made On ‘Climate Change’ (scam) »
No. One of the things leftists have been going hog wild over the past few days in regards to illegal immigration (also on kids in cages and prison bus for toddlers, both of which happened under Obama, but they still tried to Blame Trump) is Trump losing 1,500 illegal alien kids, which Is The Worst Thing Ever!!!!!!. In Liberal World, it’s 20 times worse than something like running over 2,500 guns, losing them, and having them be implicated in the shootings up to death of Mexicans, Mexican kids, and US Border Patrol agents. Surprisingly, the NY Times actually pours cold water on this (but, Monday was a holiday, so an actual reporter, probably an intern, did Journalism)
Did the Trump Administration Separate Immigrant Children From Parents and Lose Them?
President Trump over the weekend falsely blamed Democrats for a “horrible law†separating immigrant children from their parents. In fact, his own administration had just announced this policy earlier this month.
His comments followed days of growing alarm that federal authorities have lost track of more than 1,000 immigrant children, mostly from Central America, giving rise to hashtags like #WhereAreTheChildren and claims that children are being ripped from their parents’ arms at the border and then being lost.
But the president is not the only one spreading wrong information. Across social media, there have been confusing reports of what happened to these immigrant children. Here are some answers.
Did the Trump administration separate nearly 1,500 immigrant children from their parents at the border, and then lose track of them?
No. The government did realize last year that it lost track of 1,475 migrant children it had placed with sponsors in the United States, according to testimony before a Senate subcommittee last month. But those children had arrived alone at the Southwest border — without their parents. Most of them are from Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala, and were fleeing drug cartels, gang violence and domestic abuse, according to government data.
So, not ripping them from their mother’s breast and placing them with utter strangers and stuff? Huh.
Officials at the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees refugee resettlement, began making calls last year to determine what had happened to 7,635 children the government had helped place between last October and the end of the year.
From these calls, officials learned that 6,075 children remained with their sponsors. Twenty-eight had run away, five had been removed from the United States and 52 had relocated to live with a nonsponsor. The rest were unaccounted for, giving rise to the 1,475 number. It is possible that some of the adult sponsors simply chose not to respond to the agency.
Surprise! People not responding to calls. Weird, eh? How many calls do you blow off? One has to wonder how many were just bad numbers.
But, wait, it gets better
Losing track of children who arrive at the border alone is not a new phenomenon. A 2016 inspector general report showed that the federal government was able to reach only 84 percent of children it had placed, leaving 4,159 unaccounted for.
So this happened under Obama, and there was no freakout from the Credentialed Media nor Democrats. Anyhow
https://twitter.com/MaxMisal/status/1001228704457125888
Fancy THAT! This puts the Left's selective outrage over immigrants in DAMNING perspective https://t.co/ZRj7aswKzz
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) May 28, 2018
That’s a good thread to read.
Read: Say, Did The Trump Admin Really Lose A Bunch Of Illegal Alien Kids? »
When you control the education system and the news media, you can forcefeed young stupid minds anything you want
Young Americans Want Solutions To Climate Change
It was one of the largest youth-led protests since the Vietnam War, as hundreds of thousands of Americans took to the capital to protest gun violence. But it wasn’t the size or scale of the March for Our Lives that made it remarkable. As Robinson Meyer of The Atlantic wrote, it was that “adults paid attention to the everyday lives and traumas of young people — not out of fear, anxiety or frustration — but out of respect.â€
I thought the march was about gun grabbing and disarmament of law abiding citizens gun control. No? How is this part of Hotcoldwetdry?
Youth organizers from Parkland, Florida, made gun violence into a personal issue, and in so doing, they mobilized millions. Now, their peers in high schools and colleges across the United States are vying to do the same for climate change.
“Seeing it from that perspective, it isn’t a partisan issue. These children are fearing for their lives, and they just want change. That’s what we want to do with our movement,†said Zanagee Artis, a high school senior from Clinton, Connecticut and founding member of Zero Hour, a youth-led climate advocacy group. “Some people might not believe in climate change, but we’re asking them to believe in us. We want change as well.â€
Ah. That’s how. As usual, the Cult of Climastrology attempts to infiltrate if not hijack everything else.
And I’ll “believe in you” when you walk the talk.
Around nine in 10 millennials understand that the climate is changing, the highest proportion of any age group, while nearly eight in 10 think humankind must work to stem the rise in temperature. That includes a majority of Republicans. Most young Republicans recognize that humans are altering the climate and want the government to tackle the problem.
And all their solutions involve force by government, rather than changing their own behavior. Go figure.
Read: Young Americans Totally Want ‘Climate Change’ (scam) Solutions On Other People »
…is a flood stream from too much carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Bunkerville, with a post on Bugler’s Holiday for Memorial Day.
Some others with Memorial Day posts at time of writing this in the morning (7:15).
I’m sure there will be more for those I follow on Feedreader.
Read: If All You See… »
Doom, guys, total doom
Study: Climate change could turn streams into carbon polluters
A new study has found that if the climate warms as projected, warmer streams could compound the effects of global warming by adding more heat-trapping carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.
Scientists tested the carbon output of streams at seven locations across the globe, including watersheds in Oregon, Puerto Rico, Alaska and Australia.
Seven! Doom!
They used that data to simulate how much more carbon dioxide streams would emit if their temperatures were warmer by 1 degree Celsius. Overall, they found that small increase in temperature resulted in a 24 percent increase in carbon dioxide emissions.
In other words, the just got the results they wanted from computer models.

Read: Everybody Panic: Hotcoldwetdry Could Turn Streams Into Carbon Polluters »
Over at A View From The Beach (which has a great morning post on swimming), Fritz has a long running series on Reasons Trump Was Elected, like this one. Many of them revolved around shoddy, idiotic, unhinged, Trump Derangement Syndrome media reports. Like this one by Excitable Noah Berlatsky at NBC News
The Trump effect: New study connects white American intolerance and support for authoritarianism
Since the founding of the United States, politicians and pundits have warned that partisanship is a danger to democracy. George Washington, in his Farewell Address, worried that political parties, or factions, could “allow cunning, ambitious and unprincipled men” to rise to power and subvert democracy. More recently, many political observers are concerned that increasing political polarization on left and right makes compromise impossible, and leads to the destruction of democratic norms and institutions.
A new study, however, suggests that the main threat to our democracy may not be the hardening of political ideology, but rather the hardening of one particular political ideology. Political scientists Steven V. Miller of Clemson and Nicholas T. Davis of Texas A&M have released a working paper titled “White Outgroup Intolerance and Declining Support for American Democracy.” Their study finds a correlation between white American’s intolerance, and support for authoritarian rule. In other words, when intolerant white people fear democracy may benefit marginalized people, they abandon their commitment to democracy.
Miller and Davis used information from the World Values Survey, a research project organized by a worldwide network of social scientists which polls individuals in numerous countries on a wide range of beliefs and values. Based on surveys from the United States, the authors found that white people who did not want to have immigrants or people of different races living next door to them were more likely to be supportive of authoritarianism. For instance, people who said they did not want to live next door to immigrants or to people of another race were more supportive of the idea of military rule, or of a strongman-type leader who could ignore legislatures and election results.
You can see kinda where this is going, right? Part of it is that if you do not want illegal aliens in the U.S., well, then you support authoritarianism and white nationalism. But, hey, I wonder if their survey includes anything on gentrification, which is really about “minority” racists not wanting whites to move into their neighborhoods and rehabilitate them.
Anyhow, you know this is All About Trump, right?
The World Values Survey data used is from the period 1995 to 2011 — well before Donald Trump’s 2016 run for president. It suggests, though, that Trump’s bigotry and his authoritarianism are not separate problems, but are intertwined. When Trump calls Mexicans “rapists,” and when he praises authoritarian leaders, he is appealing to the same voters.

So, a meager 17 years of data, take during the time of two Democrat presidents and one Republican one, long before Trump, but, this is about Trump? Sigh
“Social intolerance isn’t just leading to GOP support as we know it and see it now,” Miller says. “It’s leading to preferences in favor of the kind of candidate the GOP ultimately nominated and supported for president.” In embracing the politics of white identity, then, the GOP made a Trump possible — and is likely to make more Trump-like candidates successful in the future.
Another meme running around the Right-O-Sphere is “this is why Trump won in 2016 and will win in 2020”. And this type of TDS article is exactly why Trump will win in 2020.
Read: New Study Links Trump With White American Intolerance And Authoritarianism Or Something »
The UK has already pretty much banned most privately owned firearms, but, they’ve never had anything like a 2nd Amendment (and Britain is rather the reason the U.S. has said Amendment). Now they are working hard on knife control
A judge has called for a drastic rethink on the way we use knives in kitchens in a bid to reduce the number of young men dying on our streets because of knife crime.
And he has come up with an idea for a scheme that could be rolled out across the UK where members of the public could take their kitchen knives to be ‘modified’ and the points ground down into rounded ends.
This comes from Judge Nic Madge, who last month jailed Jordon Worth, of Stewartby, Bedfordshire, for seven-and-a-half years after she inflicted a catalogue of injuries on her boyfriend Alex Skeel.
Judge Madge has now come out to say that the use of headline grabbing Rambo knives and samurai swords was relatively rare and it was was the points of ordinary kitchen knives that was causing the soaring loss of life among youngsters.
‘But why we do need 8′ or 10′ kitchen knives with points? Butchers and fishmongers do, but how often, if at all, does a domestic chef use the point of an 8′ or 10′ knife? Rarely, if at all,’ he said.
At the moment police forces hold ‘amnesties’ where bins are placed outside police station and members of the public can get rid of lethal weapons – no questions asked.
I mean, seriously, people, do you actually need a long pointed knife for your home kitchen? If you’re like me, you usually use one of the smaller knives when you need a point to cut something open. And you just know that you feel a little bit of the old Jack the Ripper when you’re holding that long, pointed, knife, and that you could go on a stabbing spree at anytime. Because it’s obviously the fault of the knife.
Judge Madge’s idea is for everyone to be able to take the knives from their kitchen drawers to centres where the points could be filed down.
‘I would urge all those with any role in relation to knives – manufacturers, shops, the police, local authorities, the government – to consider preventing the sale of long pointed knives, except in rare, defined, circumstances, and replacing such knives with rounded ends,’ he said.
Of course, the ones who are using the knives to stab other people aren’t going to do this. And, this being the UK, where they arrest, detain, and even jail people for things like words and reporting on pedophole grooming gangs (but the same government tends to overlook Muslim violence and crimes), you might actually see the government pass a law against pointed kitchen knives, banning them from manufacture and importation.
Because no one could possibly sharpen one. So, things like wet-stones would have to be banned, too.
(graphic from Edward Dentzel)
Read: Knife Control: UK Judge Wants 10 Inch Knife Points Ground Down »