House Supposedly Revenue Neutral Carbon Tax Bill Is A Trillion Dollar Tax Hike

Just like when you read about Warmists saying a carbon tax is “free market”, be beyond skeptical when they say it is “revenue neutral”

A NEW ‘CARBON FEE’ PROPOSAL COULD HIKE TAXES BY MORE THAN $1 TRILLION

The bipartisan House Climate Solutions Caucus claims it is pushing a “revenue-neutral” carbon tax, but legislation proposed Thursday would hike taxes by at least $1 trillion over the next decade, according to Paul Blair, director of strategic initiatives for the right-leaning policy institute Americans for Tax Reform.

Florida Reps. Ted Deutch, a Democrat, and Francis Rooney, a Republican, reintroduced a bill Thursday that would place a $15-per-ton tax on carbon emissions in 2019. The tax would rise by $10-a-year increments until it hits nearly $100 per ton.

“To let the free market price out coal we should consider value pricing carbon,” Rooney saidin a statement. “A revenue-neutral carbon fee is an efficient, market- driven incentive to move toward natural gas and away from coal, and to support emerging alternate sources of energy.”

Though Rooney claims the tax is “revenue-neutral,” the plain text of the bill does not include any reciprocal tax cuts to balance out the burden of the added tax on emissions, Blair told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

The Climate Solutions Caucus, co-led by Deutch and Rooney, claims the bill is “revenue-neutral” through carbon dividends. The IRS will pay out the funds raised by the tax to U.S. households, giving “100 percent of net revenues to the American people” and maintaining the bill’s revenue neutrality.

“Historically and for anyone engaged in tax policy, the definition of ‘revenue-neutral’ is and always has been if you increase a tax, the amount of revenue it generates must be offset by an equal tax cut elsewhere,” Blair said.

The left-leaning Tax Policy Center shares Blair’s view, defining a “revenue-neutral” tax proposal as one “in which provisions that raise revenues offset provisions that lose revenues so the proposal in total has no net revenue cost or increase.”

Essentially, people are going to pay more in taxes even if the government refunded 100%. Which we all know will never happen. Oh, some people will get some money back, which makes them more reliant on government. Funny how that works, eh? First, government programs cause an increase in the cost of living in all aspects, energy, food, transportation, housing, and so much more. Plus taking more money directly out of your pocket. Then, they give you some of that money back to offset what the government caused. But, you need that money, so now you look more towards government help.

Really, if it is predicted to be $1 trillion over 10 years, you can bet that in the Real World it will be many times more than that.

BTW, gotta love the double shot of free market and revenue neutral.

Read: House Supposedly Revenue Neutral Carbon Tax Bill Is A Trillion Dollar Tax Hike »

If All You See…

…is horrible carbon pollution in the sky from evil fossil fueled airplanes, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Chicks On The Right, with a post on “Republican” Ana Navarro trying to get the Dems to pick a candidate to beat Trump.

It’s Australia week!

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

patriotic pinup Walt Otto

Happy Sunday! Another gorgeous day in America. The Sun is shining, the birds are singing, and consumer confidence is up. This pinup is by Walt Otto, with a wee bit of help.

What’s happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Ice Age Now covers global warming politicians causing more problems then global warming
  2. Jo Nova discusses the insane cost of energy in Australia due to renewables
  3. Not A Lot Of People Know That covers the climainsanity at Davos
  4. 357 Magnum catches the NY Times discussing Venezuela without mentioning Socialism
  5. Blazing Cat Fur notes the CBC yammering about white privilege during the Indigenous People’s March
  6. Bunkerville discusses Washington considering a statewide rent control
  7. Creeping Sharia notes another refugee arrested for plotting terrorism in Canada
  8. DaTechGuy’s Blog has thoughts on the shutdown deal
  9. Geller Report highlights another Islamist bombing of Christians in the Philippines
  10. Hogewash has a cool shot of a supernova (this is not a euphemism for something political. It’s real)
  11. Jihad Watch highlights another wonderful sexual assaulting refugee in Germany
  12. Legal Insurrection discusses Trump’s only real choice on the wall
  13. Moonbattery covers pronouns as thoughtcrimes
  14. Pacific Pundit is bummed out that Ocasion-Cortez will miss the Sundance Festival due to the shutdown
  15. And last, but not least, Political Clown Parade discusses Socialism running its course once again

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Good Luck, Germany: All Coal Plants To Close, Will “Rely” On Renewables

This should be fun. The green grid in Australia collapsed under the weight of the heat wave, which is typically the norm when “relying” on energy that is called “the renewable supply duck neck (power only arrives when it isn’t needed).” Solar doesn’t work at night when people are home and trying to sleep with air conditioning (something Warmsts are trying to eliminate for Other People). Wind turbines do not supply energy when the wind isn’t blowing between 5 to 30 miles per hour. Damns are only available in certain areas, and extreme enviros not only block new ones, they want old ones torn down. And they also want no new nuclear plants, and are getting old ones turned off

Germany to close all 84 of its coal-fired power plants, will rely primarily on renewable energy

Germany, one of the world’s biggest consumers of coal, will shut down all 84 of its coal-fired power plants over the next 19 years to meet its international commitments in the fight against climate change, a government commission said Saturday.

The announcement marked a significant shift for Europe’s largest country — a nation that had long been a leader on cutting CO2 emissions before turning into a laggard in recent years and badly missing its reduction targets. Coal plants account for 40% of Germany’s electricity, itself a reduction from recent years when coal dominated power production.

“This is an historic accomplishment,” said Ronald Pofalla, chairman of the 28-member government commission, at a news conference in Berlin following a marathon 21-hour negotiating session that concluded at 6 a.m. Saturday. The breakthrough ended seven months of wrangling. “It was anything but a sure thing. But we did it,” Pofalla said. “There won’t be any more coal-burning plants in Germany by 2038.”

The plan includes some $45 billion in spending to mitigate the pain in coal regions. The commission’s recommendations are expected to be adopted by Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government.

“It’s a big moment for climate policy in Germany that could make the country a leader once again in fighting climate change,” said Claudia Kemfert, professor for energy economics at the DIW Berlin, the German Institute for Economic Research. “It’s also an important signal for the world that Germany is again getting serious about climate change: a very big industrial nation that depends so much on coal is switching it off.”

The decision to quit coal follows an earlier bold energy policy move by the German government, which decided to shut down all of its nuclear power plants by 2022 in the wake of Japan’s Fukushima disaster in 2011.

Now, perhaps there will be some great breakthrough between now and 2038. You never know. But, probably not

The plan to eliminate coal-burning plants as well as nuclear means that Germany will be counting on renewable energy to provide 65% to 80% of the country’s power by 2040. Last year, renewables overtook coal as the leading source and now account for 41% of the country’s electricity.

This has also led to more people relying on a the original renewable: wood. The use of wood, particularly wood pellets, has skyrocketed in German homes over the last 10 years as they’ve gone on this climalarmist journey. Which means more trees cut down. Which also leads to more particulate pollution. And this will all lead to an increase in the cost of energy to go with the unreliability, which means the cost of living will skyrocket.

Of course, one has to wonder if what will happen instead of solar and wind (where will it all go? The footprints of these are huge) is that the use of natural gas will skyrocket, and one of Germany’s biggest suppliers is….Russia.

Anyhow, good luck, Germany.

Read: Good Luck, Germany: All Coal Plants To Close, Will “Rely” On Renewables »

A Government Created Carbon Tax Is The Ultimate Free Market Solution Or Something

Here we go again. The Cult of Climastrology just can’t give up a good talking point, and these Statists think things implemented and run by the government are free market. Not sure who Erik Kobayashi-Solomon is and what he really stands for, but, as a big time investor (I worked as a hedge fund risk manager, an investment banker in Tokyo and New York, a Market Strategist for Morningstar and as the Director of Research for a financial data start-up in Chicago) you’d think he would understand the difference

Carbon Tax: The Ultimate Free Market Solution To Climate Change

Thanks to a particularly odious little troll of a man and to a writer whose two major works the late, great Christopher Hitchens describes as “transcendently awful”, the word “tax” has a nearly obscene connotation.

Nonetheless, it is clear to me that a carbon tax, similar to those implemented in major economies throughout the world, should be broadly implemented here in the United States – the second largest emitter of carbon dioxide in the world.

Well, sure, he’d probably make a lot of money off fleecing middle and lower class citizens.

Unlike a lot of mush-minded Greenies, I am under no illusion that a tax on carbon emissions will discourage people from burning carbon-based fuel or will serve just retribution on wasteful capitalists. Nor do I think that the taxing authority will use the collected funds for anything other than a typically idiotic boondoggle. In fact, I do not even believe that a carbon tax will do anything to stop the near-term effects of climate change (there is plenty of heat stored in the ocean, and those chickens will take decades to come home to roost).

Not a very convincing argument, eh?

No. My reasoning is based completely on free market considerations.

Humans do one thing phenomenally well: adapt to obstacles. If there is a mountain in front of us, we’ll climb it, build a tunnel through it, construct a road around it, and throw up a scenic overlook on the side of it.

The pure expression of human adaptability is the free market system.

Before June 2007, no one even realized that not being able to watch their favorite superhero movie while commuting to work was even an obstacle to overcome. Now, try to take a commuter train or subway (or even an elevator) without taking your smart phone out of your pocket.

OK, you’re welcome to read the rest of this silliness, but, let it be noted that it was really the private sector which developed the ability to watch that movie, not government placing taxes on your entire life, jacking up your cost of living to finance the movies and development of the technology.

Again, the government passing any type of carbon tax legislation, then setting the terms and pricing while running the whole thing has nothing to do with a free market. It is forcing the market to respond. It is rather what is called Socialism.

Read: A Government Created Carbon Tax Is The Ultimate Free Market Solution Or Something »

If All You See…

…is a walkway needed to cross a flooded world*, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Moonbattery, with a post on limerick thoughtcrime.

*yeah, yeah, perhaps a bit of a stretch, but, I’ve said I could find a link with just about any photo, and someone sent me this one to do just that.

Read: If All You See… »

Democrats Worried That Border Battle Distracts From ‘Climate Change’ Fight

Right, right, they’re very worried about an issue that many Americans care about in theory, but, in practice? Not so much

DEMOCRATS WORRY BORDER WALL BATTLE IS DISTRACTING FROM THEIR CLIMATE AGENDA

House Democrats are concerned that President Donald Trump’s fight for wall funding and the government shutdown is derailing their attempts to target the administration’s climate agenda, Politico reported Thursday.

Nearly a dozen Democrats admit that dealing with the partial shutdown is distracting from their ultimate objective: wrapping the administration in probes and resuscitating a wayward climate push. Democratic Rep. Paul Tonko of New York, for instance, believes a lot of unfinished business is being placed on the back burner.

“It’s holding back everything and it’s terrible because there’s lot of unfinished business and a lot of important work to do,” Tonko, the chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Environment and Climate Change Subcommittee, told reporters. “The shutdown is causing that disruption.”

House Energy and Commerce Chairman Frank Pallone of New Jersey backed away from a plan to place climate change front and center.

“I had previously announced our first three hearings never believing that this shutdown would still be going on when this Committee had a chance to organize,” the Democratic congressman said in a statement. “Those critical hearings on climate change, the future of the Affordable Care Act and oversight of the Trump Administration’s inhumane Family Separation Policy will still occur, but they will not be next week.”

Democrats are itching to jump on board the so-called Green New Deal (GND). More than 40 Democratic lawmakers support the GND, a broad plan to tackle climate change and build green jobs. It remains to be seen what role a prolonged shutdown will have on the deal.

Well, good news, the shutdown is over, for at least three weeks. Then they can get back to their mission of using “environmental” concerns (has to be in quotation marks, since ‘climate change’ has little to do with the environment) in order to force through their big government ways, with lots of taxes and fees along with restrictions on citizen’s lives. All while refusing to give up their own use of fossil fuels and make their own lives carbon neutral.

Read: Democrats Worried That Border Battle Distracts From ‘Climate Change’ Fight »

Bummer: Wyoming Makes It “As Hard” To Get An Abortion As Get A Firearm

The gun grabbers constantly tell us how super easy it is to purchase a firearm. Apparently, they now do not think it’s that easy in Wyoming (via Twitchy)

https://twitter.com/JustEric/status/1088591473828872192

The link in the first tweet shows

A bill restricting women’s access to abortion received initial approval Tuesday from the House Judiciary Committee.

House Bill 140 requires a woman seeking an abortion to first meet with a provider and then wait 48 hours before terminating her pregnancy.

The bill was introduced by Sheridan Representative Richard Tass. He told the committee that unlike a clothing purchase, women can’t change their minds about an abortion. He said the bill gives women time to consider the gravity of the decision.

It still takes longer to get a handgun, but, this highlights the murderous nature of Big Abortion.

Let me ask: if you start thinking about buying a car, does it pop in your head one day and you just get it done? A few people do, and they often live to regret it. I would see them bringing in their car within a month to get out of it. It is typically a multi-day, even week or several weeks long process. When I made the decision, kinda pushed into it due to a leak in the radiator, I looked at what we had, decided on a lease. Then did even deeper research on the same vehicles I sell day in and day out (also knocked Jeep out). I took 4 test drives. Knocked one car out except as a last resort. Had a large spreadsheet. Coworker mentioned a lease special. I can deal with red for 3 years. And actually love it.

But, it wasn’t a quick process. This is a Big Decision. This is a 3 year commitment. Heck, people will take 48 hours to decide which smartphone they want, even if they have an iPhone and are going to get another. An abortion is a big life decision, and one should think hard on it.

Read: Bummer: Wyoming Makes It “As Hard” To Get An Abortion As Get A Firearm »

Trump Signs Three Week Continuing Resolution, Vows Either To Get Money Or Do It On His Own

Democrats should think hard about calling this a cave, and running up their refusal to negotiate talking points. If they haven’t been watching Trump since he started running for President, they should know that Trump won’t give up, he won’t stop, he’ll keep pushing, and attacking him on it will make him dig in further and find a way to stick it in their faces

Trump signs bill to end partial government shutdown

President Trump on Friday signed a short-term spending bill to re-open the government, ending the longest partial federal government shutdown in U.S. history. Trump signed the stop-gap spending bill just hours after the measure passed the Senate and House, respectively.

“On Friday, Jan. 25, 2019, the president signed into law: H.J. Res. 28, the ‘Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2019,’ which includes a short-term continuing resolution that provides fiscal year 2019 appropriations through Feb. 15, 2019, for continuing projects and activities of the Federal Government included in the remaining seven appropriations bills,” the White House said in a statement late Friday. “Also included in the enrolled bill are provisions regarding retroactive pay and reimbursement, and extensions of certain authorities.”

Despite an end to the 35-day partial government shutdown, Trump on Friday night felt the need to defend the move, insisting that he had not caved on his sought-after funding for border security.

The deal for a short-term spending bill, which would keep the government open until Feb. 15, was agreed on to help those affected by the partial shutdown, the president said in a tweet.

“I wish people would read or listen to my words on the Border Wall,” Trump tweeted. “This was in no way a concession. It was taking care of millions of people who were getting badly hurt by the Shutdown with the understanding that in 21 days, if no deal is done, it’s off to the races!” (snip)

During his announcement, Trump made reference to his previous threats to declare a national emergency to secure the border, calling it a “very powerful weapon,” and noted that if no deal was reached to fund border security and construction of a wall before Feb. 15, he would use his presidential powers to declare an emergency.

“Walls should not be controversial,” he said. “As commander-in-chief, my highest priority is the defense of our great country.”

In other words, he will either get his money or do something like declare a national emergency. Don’t make the mistake of thinking he doesn’t have a plan.

And part of that plan is exposing Democrats as people who are unserious about securing the border. They’ve all been saying that they would negotiate once government was reopened. Yet

https://twitter.com/esaagar/status/1088900251753345027

We’ll wait and see if something happens over the next three weeks. If Democrats won’t negotiate money for a border barrier, they will surely be shocked at what Team Trump does, you can count on that. And don’t think that Trump won’t find a way to scapegoat Pelosi, Schumer, and the Democrats and get the national media to cover it.

Read: Trump Signs Three Week Continuing Resolution, Vows Either To Get Money Or Do It On His Own »

Fake News: NY Times Writer Solicits Stories On Christian Schools

As many responded to Dan, when will they solicit stories on public schools?

Also, when will they do it on Muslim schools, which are hotbeds for extremist Islam?

Regardless, Dan tried to respond a few times in claiming he wanted good stories, too.

https://twitter.com/DanielBranon830/status/1088572764896854017

Think any of the good stories will show up? This is essentially a witch hunt due to the Covington affair. If only the same media had spend a 10th of the same time investigating the Obama administration. When they weren’t avoiding, they were surrounding the wagons.

No, it is an attempt to do a hit job on Christian based schools due to far left bias because of one small incident in which kids involved weren’t the ones at fault.

Read: Fake News: NY Times Writer Solicits Stories On Christian Schools »

Pirate's Cove