Shock: NY Times Offers Good Relief Idea On Coronovirus Response

This isn’t the first time the NY Times editorial board has offered a good relief idea. They offered one about paying up to 90% of worker’s salaries a couple weeks ago, along with other measures. And now they note something similar

‘We’re Going Down, Down, Down, Down, Down’

The federal government is struggling to deliver financial aid to faltering employers — and workers are suffering the consequences…..

The federal government was slow to react to the pandemic. Local officials began ordering businesses to shut down weeks before Congress moved to provide those businesses with the lifeline they so obviously needed. Timely action by itself could have saved millions of jobs.

Wait a minute. What’s this about the federal government being slow to act? That’s shocking, isn’t it? Kinda puts the whole federalism thing into the idea pool, eh, where we should rely more on states, counties, and municipalities, where the power belongs.

European nations, including France, Germany and Britain, are fighting mass unemployment by paying companies to hold on to their employees. The government gives money to the companies, which give it to the workers; the workers stay home and get paid.

Senator Josh Hawley, Republican of Missouri, has proposed an American version. Under his plan, the government would pay up to 80 percent of payroll costs for each employee up to the median wage — which the Social Security Administration pegged at $32,828 in 2018.

OK, so the idea is really that of EU nations and Josh Hawely, but give the NYTEB credit for pushing this

The most important shortcoming with Mr. Hawley’s program is that it’s still not big enough. It would provide a maximum of about $500 per week per employee, which is less than the $600 per week in extra unemployment benefits that Congress authorized in March.

Representative Pramila Jayapal, Democrat of Washington, proposed on Friday that the government pay 100 percent of weekly wages for workers making up to $100,000. That’s overly generous. The payment is basically an unemployment check with the added bonus that people will eventually return to the same jobs.

The government doesn’t need to carry workers making $100,000 at their full salaries to get them through the crisis. But it shouldn’t be hard to find a sensible middle ground between the two schemes.

Of course, there’s a couple big problems with this: first, Democrats are trying to use these relief bills to push all sorts of their pet policies, including abortion funding, instant contact tracking, transforming to mail in ballots (with no security measures), doing away with student loan debt, giving money to illegal aliens and legal non-citizens, raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour, and more. Rather than a targeted focus, they see this crisis as a way to implement their wish list.

The NYTEB is missing one big problem

Pelosi: House May Not Reconvene Until May — Or Longer

And here we thought they ran for office to actually lead. In an interview with Politico, Nancy Pelosi warned Donald Trump against reopening businesses too soon, even though the federal government has no real authority to shut them down in the first place. Pelosi also announced that she won’t be re-opening the House any time soon either, certainly not by their April 20 return date:

It’s rather hard to do something when the Democrat run House is absent, especially when Queen Nancy has not interest in virtual voting. Let’s be honest, Democrats want the pain to go on as long as possible and make any recovery tepid, in order to defeat Trump in November.

Read: Shock: NY Times Offers Good Relief Idea On Coronovirus Response »

Cow Poop Could Power California’s Clean Energy Future Or Something

Well, hey, the People’s Republik Of California needs something for when the solar panels and wind turbines are not supplying power, right? Something to limit the rolling brown and blackout? Let’s go old school with cow poop

Cow poop could fuel California’s clean energy future. But not everyone’s on board

Lyle Schlyer grinned as a river of frothing manure oozed down a concrete channel, the murky greenish fluid soon disappearing into a storm drain-like hole.

It was a sunny March afternoon, a few days before the novel coronavirus began shutting down much of California, and the smell of cow dung was doing nothing to dampen Schlyer’s enthusiasm. He stood atop a towering contraption that separated the manure into solid and liquid parts. A conveyor belt deposited the brown solids at the top of a stinking mound. The fluids filtered through narrow slits in a metal screen before continuing down the concrete channel.

The liquids would eventually reach a double-lined holding pond, larger than a football field and covered by a thick black tarp. A stew of gases — mostly methane and carbon dioxide — bubbled up under the tarp, creating enough pressure that you can walk across the undulating surface with sinking steps, like an open-air bounce house or a bizarre sand dune.

A few steps away, thousands of Holstein cows looked on, their moos audible over the industrial whir of the manure separator.

“It’s the grittier side of renewable fuel,” Schlyer said.

It wasn’t that many years ago when a major paper like the LA Times would have deemed this disgusting and put it in the strange news section, not propped it up as awesome. Let’s use an energy source from the B.C. era.

Of course, this probably smells less than the poop filled streets of San Francisco.

Read: Cow Poop Could Power California’s Clean Energy Future Or Something »

If All You See…

…are plants that will soon die from carbon pollution induced temperature rise, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Daley Gator, with a post on the statism of Ezekiel Emanuel.

Read: If All You See… »

Whiny People Are Whiny About UK Surfers Having A Good Time

Checking out the beach cams for North Carolina (also has Manasquan NJ and a few others), there haven’t been that many out surfing, because there really haven’t been waves. Swellmagnet shows beaches in the Los Angeles area, and, there are still people going out, though less than would be normal with some good waves (no one out right now, looks like crummy weather plus blowing out the waves at high tide). But, when I do see them, they are staying apart. And they are exercising. Now we have

From the Yahoo UK article

People are furious after pictures showed surfers flouting social distancing and taking to the waves at a Newquay beach during the coronavirus lockdown

Next week, the government is due to carry out its first review of the draconian lockdown measures introduced two-and-a-half weeks ago.

But as the Easter weekend approaches, dozens of people were pictured in the sea at Fistral Beach in Newquay on Thursday – in defiance of the social distancing measures.

Surfing has been officially banned in countries such as Portugal, Spain and Italy – but no direct legislation has been brought in for the UK.

Sounds like they are jealous. The photos of the folks in the water show them at least 6 feet apart.

Members of the surfing community claim they are entitled to be out on the water as part of their permitted daily exercise.

Exactly.

Stunned on-lookers said the scene in the sea and around Newquay town was no different to what they would normally expect to see on a sunny day.

One said: “I could not believe it. Walking around Newquay there were people everywhere dressed in wet-suits and holding surfboards.

“You wouldn’t have thought there was a pandemic. It feels more like a hot sunny day.

What were these nags doing out and about themselves? They can mind their own business.

“Although some are social distancing, it is very difficult to know when riding a wave who is near you, or who you might bump into.”

Believe me, you know where the other people are in the water the vast majority of the time, because you want to be in position to grab the wave. Some people just need to mind their own lives.

This missed the scheduled posting yesterday, so, let me add this on

Read More »

Read: Whiny People Are Whiny About UK Surfers Having A Good Time »

People In Wake County Love Them Some Bat Soup Virus Snitching

This is going on all over, but, so far here in Wake County, law enforcement hasn’t rolled out fines

Nearly 500 stay-at-home order complaints filed in Wake County

Law enforcement agencies throughout Wake County have received hundreds of complaints since county commissioners implemented a stay-at-home order two weeks ago to curb the spread of the coronavirus.

Gov. Roy Cooper issued a similar statewide order that took effect March 30. Sit-down service at restaurants was banned in an earlier order that took effect March 17.

Area police departments and the Wake County Sheriff’s Office say they have chosen to educate and warn people and businesses about the restrictions under the orders before issuing citations.

On March 24, Rolesville police issued two citations to employees at Main Street Tavern after warnings to shut down were ignored.

Does it disturb anyone else that a governor can simply order businesses to close without getting specific permission from the duly elected lawmakers? Obviously, not just Roy. If people want to take the chance, isn’t it “my body my choice”?

On Thursday, Fuquay-Varina police announced they will begin issuing citations for repeat offenders of the stay-at-home order. Records show officers in Fuquay-Varina have received 75 complaints. (snip)

The Raleigh Police Department has received 139 calls since March 19.

“The RPD has not had to issue any citations or warnings,” department spokeswoman Donna-maria Harris said in a statement. “People have been very responsive to our educational approach and complied immediately.”

Most people are smart enough to comply in the moment.

Cary police have received 164 compliance calls since March 28, the most of any jurisdiction in the county.

A Cary spokesperson said officers responded to at least 35 businesses, and all of them were either exempt from the order or complied with warnings to close. (snip)

The Wake County Sheriff’s Office has received only eight complaints, while Morrisville police got 42 and Wake Forest 27.

Raleigh is the biggest city in the county. The other cities basically surround Raleigh, so have decent populations, as well. Most of the other towns in proximity haven’t reported data. I guess we’re in the age of snitching for being outside. Perhaps Excitable Paul Krugman should worry more about this march to authoritarianism.

Read: People In Wake County Love Them Some Bat Soup Virus Snitching »

The Climate Crisis Could Maybe Possibly We Think Cause Lots Of Extinctions Or Something

I caught this study yesterday, but, didn’t bother posting on it, because I wanted to wait to see where the media went with it

Climate change could cause sudden biodiversity losses worldwide

A warming global climate could cause sudden, potentially catastrophic losses of biodiversity in regions across the globe throughout the 21st century, finds a new UCL-led study.

The findings, published today in Nature, predict when and where there could be severe ecological disruption in the coming decades, and suggests that the first waves could already be happening.

The study’s lead author, Dr Alex Pigot (UCL Centre for Biodiversity & Environment Research): “We found that climate change risks to biodiversity don’t increase gradually. Instead, as the climate warms, within a certain area most species will be able to cope for a while, before crossing a temperature threshold, when a large proportion of the species will suddenly face conditions they’ve never experienced before.”

“It’s not a slippery slope, but a series of cliff edges, hitting different areas at different times.”

Dr Pigot and colleagues from the USA and South Africa were seeking to predict threats to biodiversity over the course of the 21st century, rather than a single-year snapshot. They used climate model data from 1850 to 2005, and cross-referenced it with the geographic ranges of 30,652 species of birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, fish, and other animals and plants. The data was available for areas across the globe, divided up into 100 by 100 km square grid cells.

“Climate model data.” Why not use the actual data? It’s 2020. The actual temperature and other readings are available. And why stop in 2005? Could it have something to do with being deep in a warming pause?

The researchers predict that if global temperatures rise by 4°C by 2100, under a “high emissions” scenario which the researchers say is plausible, at least 15% of communities across the globe, and potentially many more, will undergo an abrupt exposure event where more than one in five of their constituent species crosses the threshold beyond their niche limit within the same decade. Such an event could cause irreversible damage to the functioning of the ecosystem.

If warming is kept to 2°C or less, potentially fewer than 2% of communities will face such exposure events, although the researchers caution that within that 2% includes some of the most biodiverse communities on the planet, such as coral reefs.

There’s been just a 1 degree Celsius rise since 1850: 4C may be the worst case, but even another 1C rise in the next 80 years is silly.

The researchers predict that such unprecedented temperature regimes will begin before 2030 in tropical oceans, and recent events such as mass bleaching of corals on the Great Barrier Reef suggest this is happening already. Higher latitudes and tropical forests are predicted to be at risk by 2050.

And what will these climahysterics do when this doesn’t happen by 2030? Will there be apologies for perpetuating doomsaying prognostications?

Of course we get

Just a smattering of “we’re doomed. Maybe. Possibly.” We can fix this all with a tax and you giving up your freedom, liberty, and choice.

Read: The Climate Crisis Could Maybe Possibly We Think Cause Lots Of Extinctions Or Something »

Hot Take: NY Times Says Authoritarian Rule Is Just Around The Corner

Excitable Paul Krugman is Very Concerned. See, he thinks authoritarian rule is coming, but fails to mention all the people arrested, detained, and fined over failing to social distance. Like that guy on the paddleboard who wasn’t near anyone. Or how about the use of ankle monitors in Kentucky? And using Google data to track where everyone is going? And more? Nope, something different, in a piece that would have been in Prison Planet or the Democratic Underground 10 years ago

American Democracy May Be Dying
Authoritarian rule may be just around the corner.

(info on the really bad unemployment data)

Yet the scariest news of the past week didn’t involve either epidemiology or economics; it was the travesty of an election in Wisconsin, where the Supreme Court required that in-person voting proceed despite the health risks and the fact that many who requested absentee ballots never got them.

Why was this so scary? Because it shows that America as we know it may not survive much longer. The pandemic will eventually end; the economy will eventually recover. But democracy, once lost, may never come back. And we’re much closer to losing our democracy than many people realize.

To see how a modern democracy can die, look at events in Europe, especially Hungary, over the past decade.

What happened in Hungary, beginning in 2011, was that Fidesz, the nation’s white nationalist ruling party, took advantage of its position to rig the electoral system, effectively making its rule permanent. Then it further consolidated its control, using political power to reward friendly businesses while punishing critics, and moved to suppress independent news media.

Until recently, it seemed as if Viktor Orban, Hungary’s de facto dictator, might stop with soft authoritarianism, presiding over a regime that preserved some of the outward forms of democracy, neutralizing and punishing opposition without actually making criticism illegal. But now his government has used the coronavirus as an excuse to abandon even the pretense of constitutional government, giving Orban the power to rule by decree.

Obviously, you can see where Conspiracy Theorist Paul is going. And he links this all to the recent primary in Wisconsin, in which the GOP forced them to vote in person, because that’s kinda what the law requires. And the GOP is only in charge of the legislature because of gerrymandering (the Dems never do that, right?), even though Dems had more votes (funny how they hate allowing other people their voices). And this all means

This November, it’s all too possible that Trump will eke out an Electoral College win thanks to widespread voter suppression. If he does — or even if he wins cleanly — everything we’ve seen suggests that he will use a second term to punish everyone he sees as a domestic enemy, and that his party will back him all the way. That is, America will do a full Hungary.

See, it was Trump who forced Hillary to forgo visiting several states she needed, like Wisconsin. And be a terrible candidate and a terrible person. And pass out on 9/11. And violate all those national security rules, regs, and laws.

What if Trump loses? You know what he’ll do: He’ll claim that Joe Biden’s victory was based on voter fraud, that millions of illegal immigrants cast ballots or something like that. Would the Republican Party, and perhaps more important, Fox News, support his refusal to accept reality? What do you think?

Paul should just come out and write it, having gone this far: he thinks Trump will go dictator and refuse to leave. But, we’ve seen this same thing when it came to George Bush in 2004 and 2008, but those conpiracy theories came more from places like Prison Planet, the Democratic Underground, the Daily Kos, and other hardcore places, not the New York Times

So that’s why what just happened in Wisconsin scares me more than either disease or depression. For it shows that one of our two major parties simply doesn’t believe in democracy. Authoritarian rule may be just around the corner.

See, all those people getting sick and dying isn’t that bad in Paul’s World. The First Street Journal notes that the Supreme Court refused to change the voting laws in Wisconsin, especially when there were no provisions of mail in ballot security. Further

Dr Krugman bemoans his fears of authoritarian rule, yet the left in general, and The New York Times specifically, have been cheering that very same authoritarian rule by Democratic governors and mayors, with our constitutional rights under the First, Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments just blithely swept aside, as the majority of the public seem to support. When we are allowing, with only a few ineffectual protests, state Governors to use the force of law, backed up by police power, to confine people to their homes, to stop cars with out-of-state license plates, and to go door-to-door demanding to know if a resident has been in a certain place, all done without a warrant, all done without any semblance of due process of law, all done without people having a day in court, that is when we are experiencing authoritarian rule, and the esteemed Dr Krugman hasn’t uttered the first peep of protest over it.

Yup. I don’t see Paul complaining about NYC, where the Times is located, raising fines for not social distancing from $500 to $1000.

Read: Hot Take: NY Times Says Authoritarian Rule Is Just Around The Corner »

If All You See…

…are wonderful recycling bins which help stop climate doom (but you don’t actually use yours), you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Pacific Pundit, with a post on Democrats being stuck with Handsy Joe after Comrade Bernie dropped out.

From what I hear, Authorities arrested her for being out and about and stuck her in jail for 6 months.

Read: If All You See… »

Pope Francis Links Bat Soup Virus To ‘Climate Change’

This is a holy week for Christianity, as we approach Easter on Sunday. So, what does the Pope talk about? He could talk about the teachings of Jesus, the concepts of the New Testament, the evils of abortion, on loving each other, on tolerance. Nope

Pope Francis says coronavirus could be ‘nature’s response’ to climate change

Pope Francis likened the coronavirus pandemic to recent fires and floods as one of “nature’s responses” to the world’s ambivalence to climate change.

“There is an expression in Spanish: ‘God always forgives, we forgive sometimes, but nature never forgives,’” the pope said in an interview published Wednesday in The Tablet, a United Kingdom-based Catholic weekly.

The pope, 83, was responding to whether he believed coronavirus could spur ecological conversion, the idea for people to lead more environmentally conscious lives through the understanding that the natural world is a creation of God.

He’s not my pope, I’m not Catholic. He doesn’t seem to care much about the precepts of Catholicism, though. He’s more of a social justice warrior.

The pope went on to say he believed the COVID-19 outbreak that has ravaged the globe could inspire change.

“This is the time to take the decisive step, to move from using and misusing nature to contemplating it,” he said.

With more than 1.5 million coronavirus cases reported across the world, the pope said the virus has shined a “spotlight on hypocrisy” as large outbreaks continue to in the United States and parts of Europe.

“This crisis is affecting us all, rich and poor alike, and putting a spotlight on hypocrisy,” he said.

The only crisis is an imaginary one, spread by charlatans and cultists. It’s appropriate Pope Francis wore red

Read: Pope Francis Links Bat Soup Virus To ‘Climate Change’ »

Bat Soup Virus Is A Dress Rehearsal For ‘Climate Change’ Or Something

Nope, this is not the same article that Bloomberg trotted out, The Nation has their own little spin, and it unsurprisingly involves hardcore Cult of Climastrology politics and economic plans

Coronavirus Is a Dress Rehearsal for Climate Change

The under-reaction by the US government to the coronavirus was not inadvertent, a mistake. It was in part the result of a decades-long campaign to degrade the very idea that government can be a useful, essential aspect of our lives, that it can allow us to collectively accomplish tasks far beyond the capacity of any individual. Today, unfortunately, the dominant view in America, held by essentially all Republican leaders and too many Democratic ones, is that the “free market” always delivers better outcomes than the government.

But that’s the self-serving view of those who benefit most in our “winner-take-all” economy. What we need instead is a healthy, regulated balance between civil society, government, and private enterprise. And if we’re smart, we’ll use this current crisis to rebalance the scales in America. The bailouts this time cannot be like the 2008 variety, in which bankers got bonuses and millions of homeowners got screwed. We don’t just need strings attached to this bailout. We need steel cables. The interests of ordinary people must come first. Period.

Perhaps the most important lesson of the coronavirus is that if we don’t prepare now, and start thinking about how to stop problems before it’s too late, we’re risking everything we care about: our homes, our jobs, and the health of our loved ones. This is where the virus has something very important to teach us—if we’re willing to learn.

The climate crisis is going to be many, many times worse. It may happen more slowly, but let’s not kid ourselves. Greater disease transmission, food shortages, energy blackouts, floods, homelessness, joblessness, species extinction—each will stagger us and then do so again.

And, see, the only way to solve this is by Government forcing a balance between civil society, government, and private enterprise.

It goes without saying that we desperately need to change course in order to avert the worst impacts of climate change. Fortunately, what’s needed is not mysterious, but it is hard and is definitely not short-term. We can save our climate by investing in jobs policies that will transform and improve manufacturing, agriculture, electrification, transportation, housing, infrastructure, care work—and virtually every aspect of our economy. The relevant question is whether we do so in a way that will help working-class, middle-class, and poor Americans first, not last. This is how we take responsibility for the world our children and grandchildren will inherit and inhabit.

The authors of this piece never actually get around to saying what they would transform “virtually every aspect of our economy” to. What it would look like. This is typical climate cultist dissembling, because they know they would scare a lot of people off if they actually explained what would happen, essentially, once again, government controlling all aspects of people’s lives, controlling all private entities. Government taking freedom, liberty, and choice away, along with a lot of money we earn. It would create an authoritarian government.

Read: Bat Soup Virus Is A Dress Rehearsal For ‘Climate Change’ Or Something »

Pirate's Cove