…is an ocean that will soon rise up to destroy cities, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Not A Lot Of People Know That, with a post on lottery funds being used to fight ‘climate change’ (scam).
Read: If All You See… »
…is an ocean that will soon rise up to destroy cities, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Not A Lot Of People Know That, with a post on lottery funds being used to fight ‘climate change’ (scam).
Read: If All You See… »
If you watch the video and read the accounts, it does not look like a good, legal shooting
Police-involved shooting in Wisconsin prompts violent protest: report
A police officer-involved shooting on Sunday of a Black man who was shot in the back set off violent protests in the lakefront city of Kenosha,Wis., that have lasted into the early hours Monday.
Many details of the shooting were not immediately clear, but the following unrest prompted the city to issue a curfew until 7 a.m. on Monday and police asked businesses to consider staying closed “due to numerous arm robberies and shots fired calls.†(snip)
The Journal-Sentinel reported that a large crowd appeared at the scene and small fires were set in the street. One video purported to show a police officer knocked out during a protest. One person could be heard saying, “He got bricked.” (snip)
Marchers also headed to the Kenosha County Public Safety Building, which authorities had mostly blocked off. Protesters marched along lines of cars honking on their way to the station and eventually made their way to the rear parking lot. A man could be seen breaking the window of a patrol car parked along the street. Some police officers were positioned on the roof of the station as people continued toward the building.
How wise of an idea is it to destroy businesses in your own neighborhoods? Or robbing them? How many of them were black owned? Remember just a couple weeks ago when a black man walked into the street and shot a white boy in the head? It was mostly considered a local story, and when the story was run they usually left out that the shooter was black.
So, how long will the riots continue? How many police stations will be attacked? How many black businesses and housing units will be destroyed?
I actually wrote this in the morning for posting at 1030am, deciding to do something else, but, how about this?
Can someone explain why 50 people are OK, but not 175? Especially if they all wear masks?
New York blocked a wedding with 175 expected guests from being held this weekend
A federal appeals court Friday granted New York’s attempts to block weddings from having more than 50 people.
The ruling thwarted efforts by at least one couple to have a large wedding this weekend and leaves in doubt any other weddings that exceed more than 50 attendees.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo on June 24 loosened restrictions on gatherings to allow as many as 50 people to congregate as he slowly reopened the economy due to coronavirus.
Two western New York couples sued, arguing in part that the executive order is inconsistent with other orders that allows restaurants to have up to 50% of capacity.
On Aug. 7, the Buffalo-area couples successfully won a preliminary injunction blocking Cuomo’s order, and on Wednesday, a district court judge denied the state’s motion for a stay of the preliminary injunction.
So the state took its case to the federal appeals court in Manhattan and won an emergency stay Friday of the lower court’s ruling so the case can be heard.
The move blocked a couple who sued from being married Saturday in Erie County with 175 people expected to attend, the court papers said.
The couple’s attorney, Anthony Rupp, told the Times Union the wedding will be moved to a later date.
“We had won every stage of this thing, but the judge in the 2nd Circuit just cavalierly postponed it until Tuesday,” Rupp said. “So we’re very unhappy about this decision.”
At what point do people fight back? There comes a point where the government restrictions are burdensome and arbitrary, especially when the government does nothing about “protests” done by BLM/Antifa. And when the government punishes people and restricts their movement despite breaking no criminal laws. There is a 5th Amendment, you know, and it applies to all government in the U.S. Sadly, there aren’t enough judicial branch judges who believe in liberty and freedom, who believe in the Constitution.
Personally, I think they should implement it, because every experiment needs an experimental group
What to know about Michelle Wu’s ‘Green New Deal & Just Recovery’ for Boston
Boston City Councilor Michelle Wu recently laid out a vision to bring the sweeping call for a Green New Deal heralded by Washington lawmakers to Boston through a tailored, detailed-oriented slate of potential policies.
The city councilor-at-large put forth “Planning for a Boston Green New Deal & Just Recovery,â€Â a 49-page report geared towards combatting the ramifications of climate change and its intersecting issues, ranging from affordable housing and economic opportunity to transportation and racial justice.
Wu’s report also highlights a need to eliminate the disparities exacerbated by the effects of the coronavirus pandemic, which have hit low-income residents and communities of color disproportionately harder than others — the same areas that will bear the brunt of climate-induced problems. The city must have a recovery plan that prioritizes equity, the document says.
I’m getting the idea that this isn’t really about the climate, but, left wing Modern Socialist priorities.
“This is most fundamentally about the fact that no particular policy program or office or individual can do this,†Wu said Wednesday, while introducing the initiative in a virtual council meeting. “It’s really about a mass public conversation and community mobilization and prioritization of what projects should happen, where, when, what the details are.â€
It’s most fundementally about slapping massive restrictions on citizens and private entities, whether they want it or not. Some people are dumb enough/brainwashed enough to give up their freedom
In the report, the Roslindale councilor makes a renewed plea for officials to meet the urgency of the matter at hand. Boston could see as many as 40 days with temperatures above 90 degrees per year by 2030, and as many of those days as an entire summer by 2070. Fifty years from now, sea level rise could hit over three feet, and over seven feet by 2100.
None of those things will happen, but, this is presented to scare people.
“As Boston faces the most dire public health emergency in a generation, we’ve seen the scale of collective action possible when mobilizing for a crisis … Unlike the sudden shock of coronavirus, climate change and systemic inequities are slow, relentless crises,†the report reads.
Da, Comrade, collective.
Wu’s report says Boston must accelerate its decarbonization efforts, adding that eliminating carbon emissions is “the baseline for protecting against the most destructive impacts of climate change.â€
With that, the proposal offers the city should reach total carbon neutrality — meaning sources have no net emissions because emissions are balanced with other efforts to remove carbon, like planting trees — by 2040, a decade earlier than the goal set by the city’s current Climate Plan, updated by Mayor Marty Walsh in October.
Furthermore, Wu says the city should have 100 percent sustainable electricity by 2035 and net-zero municipal buildings by 2024.
OK, here are some policy recommendations for them if they really want go carbon neutral
Just a few ideas, seem reasonable, right?
Weird. It doesn’t include things like bowing to China and Iran, defunding the police, reparations, calling everyone a racist, raising taxes, restricting people’s energy choices, and locking down the economy while making everyone wear a mask. Nor is it doom and gloom
????Check out the first look at President @RealDonaldTrump's second term "Fighting For You" agenda.
Over the coming weeks, the President will be sharing additional details about his plans through policy-focused speeches on the campaign trail.https://t.co/hcPf3cleoz
— Andrew Clark (@AndrewHClark) August 24, 2020
Right now, they are all bullet points, with the headers
JobsCompare that to the hate America and gloomy DNC agenda. Compare that to the Democrats being all about running people’s lives and making them dependent on the government. It’s fun that Trump is attempting to hijack the Democrats reliance on education and healthcare. Trump wants to teach American exceptionalism and offer more school choice (granted, education should be more at the state and local level of control). On healthcare, he wants to lower drug prices, end surprise billing, and cover pre-existing conditions, among others. What he doesn’t want is to put the Government in charge of your health insurance and care, like the Democrats.
Draining the swamp, 2 of the 4 points are Passing Congressional Term Limits and Ending Bureaucratic Government Bullying of U.S. Citizens and Small Businesses. Think those won’t resonate with voters?
He even wants to Partner with Other Nations to Clean Up our Planet’s Oceans, which shouldn’t be a bipartisan thing, but, of course, Democrats want to simply control your behavior by force of law to do things like this. But, at the end of the day, the two biggest things will be COVID19 and Jobs
Compare that with Joe’s sorta Jobs plan of race baiting, clamping down on the economy until COVID19 is gone, giving money to states and municipalities so government workers won’t be laid off, bring back manufacturing for the unions, “green jobs” (say, what happened to all those under Obama’s Stimulus, which Biden was tasked with administering?), government sponsored child care, $15 minimum wage (which will destroy jobs, especially part time), and, of course, racial fear-mongering/patronizing. I love this part
And, Biden will immediately put people to work by enlisting them to help fight the pandemic, including through a Public Health Jobs Corps.
Would these be temporary jobs, or simply become permanent, unionized, impossible to get rid of jobs that don’t really do anything?
Anyhow, you remember that Lindsay Graham was not a big Trump fan prior to the election. He’s now making the case that people should be voting for Donald Trump, not against Handsy Joe Biden. And, it is a strong case
In picking conservative judges, President Trump has nominated, and the Senate has confirmed, over 200 district and circuit court judges, along with two incredibly talented Supreme Court justices.
If you don’t think that is a major thing, just imagine Handsy Joe picking extreme left wing judges and most like at least one Supreme Court Justice.
He has delivered on long-sought-after criminal justice reform, paving the way for mostly young African American and Latino men to be released from long jail sentences for nonviolent offenses so they can return to the workforce. This is a major bipartisan achievement, long sought by many presidents, that became a reality on President Trump’s watch.
Where was Joe during the last 40 years or so of him being in office in doing things like this?
President Trump has cut taxes and massively deregulated the economy so it can grow and breathe.
The number one issue is always people’s pocketbooks. During the RNC people will hear a message of positivity, love of America, and belief in the people, wanting to elevate them, not control them.
Read: Trump Releases 2nd Term Agenda Ahead Of GOP Convention »
Everyone must comply, Comrades
Fight Climate Change With Your Undies — A Hang Drying Manifesto
Hang drying clothes is a simple practice that holds nothing short of immense power and pollution-saving potential. This most humdrumiest of daily chores, in which we simply hang damp clothes over a line or rack and wait for the sun or air to dry them, has the potential to match the herculean efforts of the entire power sector — from its bulldozers, dump trucks, and train cars to its conveyor belts, thousand-degree boilers, massive cooling towers, and overhead power lines.
Yes, line drying is one ace in the hole for a species that needs every single effort to get itself out of a warming-world, 11th hour predicament. It’s a proverbial slingshot stone as we nervously stare down Carbon Goliath. Hanging laundry ranks at the top of the list of life choices we small folk can make for its ease and extraordinary, pollution-eliminating effects.
We could probably discuss how the article goes into a massive climawhine over the use of clothes dryers, but, why bother? These people really do want to kill off so much of the modern world, because their cult demands it. And you just know that the majority who push this do not practice what they preach.

Read: You Can Fight The Climate Crisis (scam) With You Undies Or Something »
…is horrible carbon pollution infused beer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Chicks On The Right, with a post on the Dems featuring a convicted murderer and kidnapper.
It’s beer week!
Read: If All You See… »

Happy Sunday! Another fantastic day in America. The Sun is shining, the flowers are blooming, and the Dodgers are kicking butt. This pinup is by Tanja Doronina, with a wee bit of help.
What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15
As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page (nope, that’s gone, the newest Apache killed access, and the program hasn’t been upgraded since 2014). While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets†calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me.
Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!
Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. And do you have a favorite blog you can recommend be added to the feedreader?
Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »
How do you get authoritarian government? This is how
Michigan appeals court backs Whitmer’s use of emergency powers amid coronavirus pandemic
A Michigan appeals court on Friday ruled in favor of Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, finding that her emergency declarations and orders in response to the coronavirus were legal.
Whitmer implemented strict lockdown measures during the crisis, and has since extended the state of emergency to keep gyms and movie theaters closed. Masks are required in many parts of the state.
Republicans in the state’s Legislature argued that she had overstepped her authority, and can unilaterally extend emergencies only if they are local, not statewide, under the 1945 Emergency Powers of the Governor Act (EPGA). They said a separate 1976 law means statewide emergencies need the Legislature’s approval after 28 days.
The appeals court, in a 2-1 decision, however, upheld a lower court’s ruling that the moves were within her power.
“A declared statewide emergency only ends upon the governor’s declaration that the emergency no longer exists. That has yet to occur in the instant case,†the ruling said.
The ruling stands squarely in opposition to the actual laws, and simply gives Whitmer the ability to just continue her repressive, semi-authoritarian decrees. When is the so-called emergency over? What terms and/or conditions end it? She hasn’t really said. Remember, initially the lockdowns were all about keeping the emergency rooms and hospitals from being overrun. Now it’s….what? Open ended till she unilaterally decides that the peasants can go back to their lives?
Republicans have promised to appeal, arguing the court got it wrong.
“The Court of Appeals ruled today that as long as it’s the opinion of a sitting governor that there’s an emergency, they can take over complete, unilateral control of the state for as long as he or she decides. No checks on power. No separation of power,†Speaker Lee Chatfield said. “This is unconstitutional.â€
The legislature passes laws. The executive implements/enforces those laws. The judiciary rules whether those laws are constitutional. Now the judiciary is deciding to ignore the laws passed. Whitmer has signed 170 executive orders this year, after just 19 in 2019. Not all of them are about Coronavirus, but most are. Now, imagine this was Donald Trump ignoring the law and just issuing restrictive EOs. How would Democrats and their pet media respond? Heck, do you think freedom loving Republicans would be listening to him, or blasting him, similar to the way Republicans blasted George W. Bush when he attempted that “pathway to citizenship”, ie, amnesty, for illegal aliens? He’d lost my potential vote.
Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey also said this week that a group was trying to gather 340,000 signatures to repeal the 1945 law.
If they get the signatures, the Legislature can pass a bill to repeal it, and Whitmer is unable to veto. Shirkey said they currently have more than 200,000.
If Michigan can’t produce 300k signatures, they’re lost as a state.
Read: Michigan Appeals Court Backs Gov. Whitmer Over Actual Law On Emergency Powers »
You remember the Green New Deal, right? It was the one which AOC’s chief of staff said wasn’t even about climate change
Talk to me again about how a Green New Deal “goes too far to address the problem” https://t.co/kgK1A7jLtR
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) August 22, 2020
This would be the same GND that has been around since February 2019, and has not been voted on in the House. I can’t even find any discussion on it in committee. Nor has AOC demanded a vote on it. And, remember, she pitched a fit when it was voted on in the GOP controlled Senate, where every Democrat voted present, including the Senate sponsor, Ed Markey. Heck, she even forgot that Markey sponsored it, wondering why they were voting on HER bill introduced in the House. She also can’t explain how her GND would stop tropical systems. Unless forcing Everyone Else to take the train (you don’t think she takes the train, right? Nothing so plebeian for her, she surely flies first class).
Meanwhile, the Earth will soon be above 130F all the time
Read: Excitable AOC Uses Double Tropical System To Push Her Green New Deal »