Democrats Have A Plan To Lower Gas Prices Or Something

Unsurprisingly, the plan is about taking profits from companies and redistributing it

Dems push plan to tax oil companies’ profits, send checks to Americans during Russia-Ukraine price spike

unintended consequencesRep. Ro Khanna and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse are pushing a bill they say will help bring relief from high gas prices to Americans – as energy industry critics argue it would do the exact opposite.

The proposal, which comes as Russia’s war on Ukraine delivers a shock to global energy prices, is called the “Big Oil Windfall Profits Tax.” According to Khanna, D-Calif., and Whitehouse, D-R.I., the bill would levy a tax on oil barrels sold by large producers “equal to 50 percent of the difference between the current price of a barrel of oil and the pre-pandemic average price per barrel between 2015 and 2019.”

The money from that tax would be sent to consumers as a quarterly rebate, according to a description of the bill, with a cutoff for single people making $75,000 or more and families making $150,000 or more.  (snip)

The tax would only affect to companies that extract over 300,000 barrels of oil per day, applying to oil extracted both domestically and worldwide, according to a press release from Khanna’s office. That threshold would exempt “[s]maller companies accounting for roughly 70 percent of the domestic production… so oil giants like Exxon Mobil and Chevron cannot simply gouge consumers further without the threat of losing market share,” it said.

“We’ve seen this script before, and we cannot allow the fossil fuel industry to once again collect a massive windfall by taking advantage of an international crisis,” Whitehouse said. A press release from Whitehouse and Khanna said the increase in gas prices, “is not justified by increases in the cost of domestic production, but is driven by international markets controlled by fossil fuel cartels.”

Tell me you don’t know how the commodities market works without telling me you don’t know how it works. Oil companies are not setting the prices. They generally make around 10 cents on the dollar. And this bill would be immediately litigated, and the 1983 Ptasynski v United States may well be revisited on the constitutionality. Don’t think the oil companies will sit there atnd take it.

Energy industry representatives, however, are pushing back against the proposal, arguing that it may have the exact opposite of its intended effect.

“Policies like a so-called windfall profits tax are misguided and would likely backfire by further driving up energy costs for American families and businesses,” American Exploration and Production Council CEO Anne Bradbury said.

Well, this is what Democrats think is wise policy, and, really, they do not care if it drives prices up, because they get to redistribute money, gaining voters who are beholden to government.

Read: Democrats Have A Plan To Lower Gas Prices Or Something »

Climate Doom Demands Same Attention As Ukraine Or Something

But, of course the climate cultists will continue to use Russia invading Ukraine to push their cult doctrine

Climate change demands same kind of attention, collaboration as war in Ukraine

Three serious dangers have confronted the world in recent years: COVID, the Russian invasion of Ukraine and climate change. Although the COVID death rate worldwide remains over 5,000 a day, international efforts to control it have met with considerable success. But the other two threats are rapidly worsening and need immediate and continued attention.

On Feb. 28, while the world was horrified by the brutal invasion of Ukraine by Vladimir Putin’s military forces, the latest report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was published.

Hoesung Lee, chair of the IPCC, described it as “a dire warning about the consequences of inaction. It shows that climate change is a grave and mounting threat to our wellbeing and a healthy planet.” United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres called the report “a damning indictment of failed climate leadership.”

Unfortunately, Putin’s invasion of Ukraine has largely crowded out other news in most of the world. The invasion, following the long, divisive battle to control COVID, has left people with frayed nerves, too burdened with worries to think about climate change. But the radically worsening climate cries for our immediate and continued attention. (snip)

The unwillingness of many Americans to do their part in controlling COVID raises the deeply concerning possibility that too many of us may also refuse to do what’s needed to stop the world’s temperature rise and the increasingly catastrophic weather events it causes. But our failure would allow a transformation of the world into one that humans have never known and in which we were not designed to exist.

Well, you know, cultists could be as intense as they were with Wuhan flu, wearing their masks everywhere when not required, double masking, going Karen on people Not Complying, and stop using fossil fuels. Make their own lives carbon neutral. They won’t, of course.

Working together, we can preserve much of the world’s climate that we have known, the range of temperature, precipitation, and dryness in which we evolved to best exist and flourish. We must admire Svitlana Krakovska’s unwillingness to surrender to Putin and share her hope that the world will also not surrender in building a climate-resilient future.

Humanity has survived warm periods, cool periods, even a glacial period. A minor uptick of 1.5F since 1850 is no big deal.

Read: Climate Doom Demands Same Attention As Ukraine Or Something »

If All You See…

…are horrible cow steaks which create carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Bunkerville, with a post noting that Russia’s attack on Ukraine has halted the production of half the world’s neon output for chips.

Read: If All You See… »

Oops: There Could Be A Big Problem With Brandon’s Test To Treat COVID Idea

This sounded good, but, the Brandon admin apparently didn’t give it a good think nor ask pharmacies for their input

Test to Treat: pharmacists say Biden’s major new Covid initiative won’t work

A major new Biden administration initiative to facilitate access to Covid-19 antivirals will have a limited impact and fail to mitigate certain health inequities, major pharmacist groups argue, because pharmacists are restricted from prescribing the pills.

Announced in Joe Biden’s State of the Union address, the “Test to Treat” program is meant to address the maddening difficulty Americans have had in accessing Covid-19 treatments. The administration will channel newly increasing stocks of antiviral pills to major retail pharmacies that have in-house clinics, providing one-stop testing and antivirals access.

The program, which the administration aims to provide for free (in the face of fierce Republican opposition to new Covid-19 spending), is also slated to roll out in Veterans Affairs clinics, community health centers and long-term care facilities.

Major participants include some 250 Walgreens stores, 225 Kroger Little Clinics and 1,200 CVS MinuteClinics. CVS clinics in particular are staffed by nurse practitioners and physician assistants, authorized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to prescribe the two currently available Covid antivirals, Pfizer’s Paxlovid and Merck and Ridgeback Biotherapeutics’ molnupiravir.

In a 9 March letter to Biden calling for pharmacists to be granted authority to prescribe these pills, 14 organizations representing pharmacies and pharmacists insisted Test to Treat’s impact will be compromised by the fact that such in-house clinics are relatively limited in number and largely in urban areas.

It surely doesn’t help that pharmacies are closing in major Democratic party run cities, due to rampant theft and danger to employees. This is a major blindspot in that, unless there is a nurse practitioner or PA, they cannot be prescribed. It looks like the Brandon admin said “here’s a great idea, let’s go with it!” without asking professionals.

Meanwhile, this is interesting, in that China is admitting a big outbreak

Covid-19 cases continue to rise in China’s worst outbreak since Wuhan

China reported thousands of new local Covid-19 cases Sunday amid the worst outbreak in the country since Wuhan in early 2020, according to the National Health Commission (NHC).

Health officials said 2,125 cases were reported across 58 cities in 19 of 31 mainland provinces, marking the fourth consecutive day China reported more than 1,000 daily local cases. More than 10,000 cases have been reported since the latest outbreak began in early March, the NHC said.

Saturday, the commission reported 3,122 local cases — the highest number of daily infections since the Wuhan outbreak and the first time new cases have exceeded 3,000 in a day, NHC data showed.

Throughout the pandemic, China has adhered to a strict zero-Covid policy that aims to stamp out all outbreaks and chains of transmission using a combination of border controls, mass testing, quarantine procedures and lockdowns.

Nearly half of the total infections in the latest outbreak have been reported in northeastern Jilin province, with 4,605 cases since March 1, when the first clusters of cases in Jilin’s border city Yanbian were identified, according to the provincial government.

Does anyone actually believe there have been no outbreaks since the initial one? And believe the numbers are not particularly high for such a populous country? It must be really bad if the ruling Chinese communist party are allowing this to be broadcast, and if it could threaten half their economy. It won’t be good for Apple fanboys

Foxconn Halts iPhone Shenzhen Site Due to Covid Lockdown

Apple Inc. supplier Foxconn is halting operations at its Shenzhen sites, one of which produces iPhones, in response to a government-imposed lockdown on the tech hub city.

The Taiwanese company, also known as Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., has its China headquarters in the area and a key manufacturing site in Guanlan. It is suspending operations at the two campuses and has reallocated production to other sites to reduce impact from the disruption, the company said in a statement. Foxconn didn’t specify the length of the suspension. The measures from the Chinese government call for non-essential businesses in Shenzhen to halt until March 20.

I’m sure iPhone users will argue that the this is an essential business.

Read: Oops: There Could Be A Big Problem With Brandon’s Test To Treat COVID Idea »

Nevada Climate Cultists Are Good With Action As Long As Nothing Is Done

Like I’ve said, Warmists are all excited for action in theory. Once it comes to practice? There’s always a Reason

Climate change demands action, but Nevada activists say not at the cost of species and fragile ecosystems

In the Mojave Desert, Shannon Salter walks past creosote bushes and Mojave yucca, the plant’s spiky, dagger-like leaves sticking up toward the sky.

Wearing a heavy down jacket and a floppy hat, she comes up to a fence line and stares at the construction of a project she fought hard to stop.

Salter, a poet and part-time teacher, has been camping since October near the Yellow Pine Solar Project, about a 20-minute drive from Pahrump. She was a staunch opponent to the project, wanting to protect the more than 90,000 old-growth yucca and desert ecosystem.

Once it got approved, she decided to stick around to watch the bulldozers clear the 3,000 acres of land to make way for a large-scale solar field that will provide power for 100,000 homes in California.

“I’m there making a presence in the valley,” she said. “I’m keeping watch. I wanted somebody to bear witness to the destruction. … I don’t think people realize the enormity of it.

Once the projects get the green light, the Warmists/enviro-weenies always try and shut them down

Near Beatty, a town of around 900 residents about two hours away from Las Vegas, there’s a slew of proposed solar projects that the residents fear will alter the views and drive away tourists.

There are six projects around Beatty that would cover thousands of acres, said Erika Gerling, a Beatty resident and chair of the Beatty Advisory Board. Beatty, known as the “gateway to Death Valley,” has been working for 10 years to promote itself as a recreation destination, Gerling said.

“Tourism is a huge thing for us,” Gerling said. “It’s our bread and butter.”

Someone has to pay for this, right? Besides, I thought all these green projects would bring jobs and prosperity? No?

“It’s frightening,” Gerling said. The projects are in very early stages, having been submitted to the Public Utilities Commission. “We want to preserve the history and the nature of our area. That’s what we’re for.”

“We are not against renewable energy,” she said. “We are not against solar energy. We are just not in favor of the location of these projects.”

So, where do they want them?

The desert also sequesters carbon, and when heavy machinery disturbs and lifts the desert soil, that carbon is released back into the atmosphere, Cunningham said. And with many projects proposed in the Mojave Desert with gaps in between, conservationists worry the ecosystem will be fragmented.

“There’s got to be better alternatives than destroying these ecosystems,” Cunningham said.

Name it. Their support of renewables always hits a wall when it is in their own backyard. And the piece continues on and on with all the projects that these people are against. Surprise!

Read: Nevada Climate Cultists Are Good With Action As Long As Nothing Is Done »

With Inflation, High Gas Prices, And War, Leftist Now Discussing “Changing The System”

It was only a matter of time before the Usual Suspects started to use the current crises for their nefarious purposes, just like they’ve attempted to use a slight increase in the global temperature in the last 170 years, attempted to use COVID

Incessant crises show old economic model is running on empty

First it was a financial crisis. Then a decade of slow growth that bred political anger. After that came a pandemic. Just as the threat of Covid-19 appeared to be receding, along came a European war. Welcome to the era of incessant crises.

Comparisons are often made between today and the 1970s, and in some respects they are appropriate. A global economy already exhibiting plenty of inflationary pressure has been hit by an oil price shock, just as it was in late 1973.

Almost half a century ago, the Opec oil cartel ratcheted up the price of crude during the Yom Kippur war. The sanctions imposed on Russia’s energy exports are having a similar – albeit so far less dramatic – impact. The cost of crude climbed to almost $140 (£107) a barrel at one point last week but it would need to rise a lot further – to $180 a barrel – to beat the 2008 record, once allowance is made for inflation.

Even so, higher energy prices are something western governments could do without. US inflation has already hit 7.9% and will rise further in the coming months. Pretty much each month since last summer, UK inflation has been higher than expected, and it would be no real surprise to see it rise above 10% this spring. That’s still some way short of the peak in 1975, when inflation climbed above 25%.

So, what is The UK Guardian’s David Elliot proposing, after a long discussion of past doom?

There is, though, an unmistakeable sense that the old model is running on empty, while the talk of levelling up and greening the economy suggests that the equivalent of the economic settlement that brought stability to the postwar decades is lurking out there somewhere. The current era of permanent crisis has highlighted the faults of the current system and the difficulties involved in returning to the pre-2007 status quo. It hasn’t yet given way to a fully fledged alternative, although history suggests that sooner or later it will.

Like with most of the climate cultists, Elliot isn’t quite ready to name what the new model should be, as that would scare people. When some Warmists actually say what they want, full on Modern Socialism with the government in charge of everything, people typically go “whoa, whoa, whoa there”, even your average Warmist. That said, expect more Modern Socialists to start making Recommendations for a New Model as the problems continue.

Here in the U.S., a poll like that would usually have pundits and politicians changing their tunes. These days, it will incent them try and jame more Leftism down our throats.

Read: With Inflation, High Gas Prices, And War, Leftist Now Discussing “Changing The System” »

If All You See…

…is horrible carbon pollution causing meat, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Not A Lot OF People Know That, with a post on Boris Johnson plotting a way out of Net Zero.

It’s grilling week!

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Patriotic Pinup Runci

Happy Sunday! Another great day in the Once and Future Nation of America. The sun is shining, the birds are singing, and baseball is coming back! Though, this whole “DH in the NL” has to go. This pinup is by Edward Runci, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Outside The Beltway discusses the death threat to Mike Pompeo from Iran (who Biden is negotiating with)
  2. Pacific Pundit covers Kamala finally telling the truth
  3. Powerline notes the madness of Slow Joe when it comes to Iran
  4. Sister Toldjah covers Tulsi Gabbard discussing why Kamala was sent overseas
  5. The America Conservative digs deep into Florida’s anti-grooming bill
  6. White House Dossier notes the Brandon admin paying bounties for private groups to “find” info on Israeli human rights abuses
  7. The Daley Gator discusses how any criticism of Kamala is raaaaacist
  8. The First Street Journal says that a 12 year old shooting at cops is not a martyr
  9. The Last Refuge features Clueless Kamala saying Ukraine is part of Ukraine
  10. The Lid covers 14 states suing Brandon over labeling parents terrorists
  11. Virtual Mirage has your Sunday sermonette
  12. Weasel Zippers features Kamala laughing over Ukrainian refugees
  13. Watts Up With That? discusses misery for ordinary Britons
  14. Real Climate Science notes Europe to be soon powered by unicorns
  15. And last, but, not least, No Tricks Zone highlights Franklin’s expedition contradicts Mann’s hockey stick

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page (nope, that’s gone, the newest Apache killed access, and the program hasn’t been upgraded since 2014). While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your Pinups for Vets calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me. I’ve also mostly alphabetized them, makes it easier scrolling the feedreader

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. And do you have a favorite blog you can recommend be added to the feedreader?

Two great sites for getting news links are Liberty Daily and Whatafinger.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

The Worst Thing About Nuclear War Wouldn’t Be The Tens Of Millions Killed But How It Would Affect ‘Climate Change’

This is the type of piece you get when a doomsday cult is in charge: their first thought is “how does this affect the climate?” With a side of Trump Derangement Syndrome

From the screed

When we talk about what causes climate change, we usually talk about oil and gas, coal and cars, and—just generally—energy policy. There’s a good reason for this. Burning fossil fuels releases carbon dioxide, which enters the atmosphere, warms the climate, and … you know the drill. The more fossil fuels you burn, the worse climate change gets. That’s why, a couple of years ago, I spent a lot of time covering the Trump administration’s attempt to weaken the country’s fuel-economy standards. It was an awful policy, one that would have led to more oil consumption for decades to come. If pressed, I would have said that it had a single-digit-percentage chance of creating an uninhabitable climate system.

Don’t you just love how “reporters” make personal judgements, rather than just writing the news?

Since Russia invaded Ukraine two weeks ago, that threat has become a lot more real: Many Americans, including artists, climate-concerned progressives, and even a few lawmakers, have come out in support of a “no-fly zone.” But despite its euphemistic name, a no-fly zone means that NATO and the United States issue a credible threat that they will shoot down any enemy plane in Ukrainian territory. This would require U.S. bombing runs into Russian territory to eliminate air defenses, bringing the U.S. and Russia into open war, and it would have a reasonable chance of prompting a nuclear exchange. And it would be worse for the climate than any energy policy that Donald Trump ever proposed.

Oh, artists and climate concerned progressives! And, more Trump Derangement Syndrome

I mean this quite literally. If you are worried about rapid, catastrophic changes to the planet’s climate, then you must be worried about nuclear war. That is because, on top of killing tens of millions of people, even a relatively “minor” exchange of nuclear weapons would wreck the planet’s climate in enormous and long-lasting ways.

I mean, tens of millions killed right off, and, don’t forget all the later problems to people with radiation, but, that’s chump change compared to what could happen to the climate!

The hot, dry, hurricane-force winds would act like a supercharged version of California’s Santa Ana winds, which have triggered some of the state’s worst wildfires. Even in a small war, that would happen at dozens of places around the planet, igniting urban and wildland forest fires as large as small states. A 2007 study estimated that if 100 small nuclear weapons were detonated, a number equal to only 0.03 percent of the planet’s total arsenal, the number of “direct fatalities due to fire and smoke would be comparable to those worldwide in World War II.” Towering clouds would carry more than five megatons of soot and ash from these fires high into the atmosphere.

All this carbon would transform the climate, shielding it from the sun’s heat. Within months, the planet’s average temperature would fall by more than 2 degrees Fahrenheit; some amount of this cooling would persist for more than a decade. But far from reversing climate change, this cooling would be destabilizing. It would reduce global precipitation by about 10 percent, inducing global drought conditions. In parts of North America and Europe, the growing season would shorten by 10 to 20 days.

You mean nuclear winter? A term we’ve heard since not long after the nuclear bomb was used, and became a term in the 1980’s? Anyhow, because this is a cult, all that soot and ash, much of which used to be humans, is now “carbon”. Cult. And then there would be a “global food crisis”, a cute leftist catchall term, which really just means starvation.

The cult freakout continues on, ending with

The worst fears of that era, thankfully, never came to pass. Or at least, they haven’t happened yet. It is up to us to make sure that they don’t.

By worst fears, the Atlantic means anthropogenic climate change. Nuclear war is secondary.

Read: The Worst Thing About Nuclear War Wouldn’t Be The Tens Of Millions Killed But How It Would Affect ‘Climate Change’ »

LA Times: EVs Are Perfect, But, Drivers Are Glad They Paid Through The Nose For Them

Buying an EV is like buying a premium vehicle. You could have gotten an Accord, Camry, CRV, RAV4, etc, but, instead, you got a BMW X5, a Range Rover, a Jaguar. You wanted to save money on gas, but, bought an Audi A4 instead of an Accord. It’s a choice. Because some people can afford one. Spending $10k, $20K, etc on a vehicle doesn’t save you money. But, they’re sure smug about themselves

Opinion: Electric cars aren’t perfect, but we EV drivers are glad to have one now

electric vehicleIf you’re paying for gasoline right now, you probably don’t want to hear from smug electric car drivers — but I am one of those people, so please accept my apologies at the outset. We’re the ones who were surprised by fuel prices (if we happened to notice them driving past a gas station) long before most people began paying $5 or $6 per gallon for the stuff.

Of course, electric cars are not the solution to climate change and any number of woes they’re often made out to be. They too exact an environmental toll and perpetuate all the problems of car culture, minus the local emissions. But they are undeniably less awful for the world than internal-combustion vehicles — and they are plainly better cars, as any EV driver can tell you. All this was true before the recent spike in gas prices.

Wait, they aren’t a solution to ‘climate change’? It almost seems like the Elites want to force us out of privately owned vehicles. And, yes, all the mining is bad for the actual environment.

To the editor: Now is the time to purchase an electric vehicle. Between climate change, high fuel costs and dependence on foreign oil, most drivers can make the move painlessly.

If you are a two-car household, replace your gas guzzler with an electric car. Use your EV for all close-range driving, and save your gas car for long trips. You will be shocked at how much you will save without auto repairs and gas consumption.

I purchased an EV nine years ago. Since then, my second gas vehicle has averaged 3,000 miles a year.

Wait, what? The writer is saying that EVs are bad for long trips? That they’re only good for around town? That’s not much of an endorsement.

To the editor: As a recent college graduate, one of the things on my to-do list is choosing my first car. In the past, this would have been a relatively simple task, but as I researched recent car prices and maintenance costs, I was shocked. (snip)

Electric vehicles are not subject to the same price fluctuations on oil. On average it takes between $10 and $45 to fuel your electric car at a power station, versus roughly $150 to fill some gas-powered cars now. Are we going to wait to switch to EVs as the war drags on and prices rise to $8, $9, $10 per gallon?

Electric vehicles are the answer now and tomorrow.

Except, the letter writer doesn’t seem to have purchased any vehicle, including an EV. Here’s another piece from the LA Times

Ariana Escalante, 34, owns a marketing and video production company called Vydeomedia.com. Transportation: Tesla Model 3 long range.

I think just the experience of getting gas has always felt a little yucky, a little dirty. It smells bad and sometimes it drips on your shoes. I was like, “Oh, you know what? I don’t think I would miss that.” I thought that Tesla was totally inaccessible. And I’m just like a regular working-class person, but then when I actually looked at the cost comparisons, it made tons of sense.

If it’s dripping on your shoes you’re doing it wrong.

So, I decided to buy one new. I put in my deposit in November and I got delivery of the car in February. My car gets 358 miles on a charge. I think the Hyundai Sonata I drove for 10 years was around 360 or 370 miles per tank. So, almost an exact match.

That Tesla 3 costs around $51K. A Sonata SEL, almost the top end, costs $32K. Are you going to save $19K? That’s roughly 4500 gallons of gas at $4.20. If you plan to keep it long enough to drive 138K miles, you’ve hit the break-even point. Not accounting for the cost of charging the Tesla.

By the way, insuring an EV is also more expensive, anywhere from 15% to 23% higher than a regular vehicle. But, look, if you want one, get one. That’s your choice. Like buying a Range Rover over a Highlander. But, they won’t save you money.

Read: LA Times: EVs Are Perfect, But, Drivers Are Glad They Paid Through The Nose For Them »

Pirate's Cove