If All You See…

…is a wonderful planet healing bike, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day Moonbattery, with a post looking back at Hopey McChangey

Read: If All You See… »

Good Grief: Now Climate Change Is To Blame For Violent Crime

They really can’t help themselves

(Washington Post) After this summer’s many shooting incidents — the massacre in Aurora, Colo., followed by attacks near Texas A&M, at a Sikh temple in Wisconsin, at the Family Research Council in Washington and at the Empire State Building on Friday — Americans have pondered possible explanations. Gun laws. Psychological problems. Economic distress.

Consider one more. July was, after all, the hottest month on record (WT-except, it really wasn’t) Might higher temperatures and global warming spur more violent crime?

“There is good reason to believe that climate change will become one of the major forces driving crime as the century progresses,” Emory University sociologist Robert Agnew writes in “Dire Forecast: A Theoretical Model of the Impact of Climate Change on Crime,” a study published in Theoretical Criminology last year. Citing droughts, famine and extreme weather, Agnew predicts that “as individuals, groups, and states struggle to cope with the effects of climate change, their ability to legally adapt to further effects will decline.”

Anyhow, supposedly when the temps hit 90F and above, violent crime goes down. What we’re looking at is a nebulous relationship between crime and temperature. Especially since most violent crimes occur during the night time, when temps are down. But, hey, anything to continue to push the cult of climate change.

Read: Good Grief: Now Climate Change Is To Blame For Violent Crime »

Report Finds Christians Under Assault From Government And Secular Groups

Anyone who is surprised, raise your hand

(Fox News) A new report by the Family Research Council and the Liberty Institute claims that there’s been a rising pattern of hostility toward Christians in America over the past decade.

The 140-page “Survey of Religious Hostility in America,” prepared by the Liberty Institute and the Family Research Council, highlighted more than 600 examples illustrating what it characterized as religious animosity shown by judges, government bureaucrats, schools and secular groups. From ObamaCare mandates that force religious entities to pay for contraception, to children being punished for uttering prayers in school, the report’s findings shocked even those who commissioned it.

“It’s a conflict of world views,” Tony Perkins, president of Family Research Council, told FoxNews.com. “These groups want people to check their faith at the door of the public square.”

There’s no doubt that those who practice Christianity are under assault, with the intention to make sure that Christian religious views have no place out in public. Hence the terming of Christian groups who espouse their opinions as “hate groups” from those who have a different view, and attempt to shut down free speech and put those Christian groups on the defensive.

One critic said the report is guilty of blurring the line between attacking religion and upholding the Constitution. A.J. Johnson, development director of American Atheists, Inc., said no one condones hate crimes such as the FRC shooting. But many other examples cited are simply cases in which advocates called for the separation of church and state,” Johnson said.

What’s amazing is how utterly clueless these anti-Christian people are. A letter from Jefferson to some northern Baptists, which makes a lot of sense when you read it, and doesn’t mean what these people think, doesn’t decide the Constitution. The entire point of the religion cause, as most of us know, was to restrict the federal government from enacting law that forces people to practice one brand of religion. Many, many people came to the New World to escape a government which worked hand in hand with one branch of Christianity. It never said there couldn’t be religion in government, nor religious symbols on government property. And many of the examples cited in the report do not have anything to do with government.

“The Family Research Council distorts court cases upholding the First Amendment as examples of “religious hostility,” she said. “In reality, they are imposing their beliefs onto others and claiming to be victims of religious persecution when they do not get unique Christian privilege.”

Yet, what of these secular groups and government? Are they not forcing their views on others? The thing is, these anti-religion groups tend to target Christians. Interestingly, when there are Islam days in government schools, we never hear about the groups going after the schools. These secular and government forces tend to be against Christianity, not other religions, and are entirely intolerant of other people’s points of view.

You can read much more at the FRC website Religious Hostility in America.

Read: Report Finds Christians Under Assault From Government And Secular Groups »

Obamanomics: Most Unemployed Unable To Find A Comparable Job

Obviously, this must be the fault of George Bush, Ronald Reagan, Republicans, international issues, tornadoes, tsunamis, earthquakes, and ATMs. Nothing is ever the fault of Obama’s pathetic, uninformed, far left policies based on imaginary economic notions

(Washington Post) Many workers are nervous about their livelihoods despite the economic recovery — and for good reason, it turns out.

Among those workers who lost a good job because of the struggling economy over the past three years, roughly one in four found a job that pays as well, according to data released Friday by the Labor Department.

The others remained unemployed, stopped looking for work or accepted jobs at lower wages.

“This data is telling a story of unemployment inflicting long-term damage for a lot of people,” said Michael Mandel, an economist at the Progressive Policy Institute, a centrist think tank. “This won’t turn around until wages overall start rising — and so far, we haven’t seen any strong signs of that.”

We can argue till we’re blue in the face regarding who/what is to blame for this recession (which officially ended in June, 2009) and the terrible conditions that have persisted ever since: the question to ask is “exactly what have Obama’s policies done to fix it?” In every case, the deeper the recession the stronger the recovery. For most Americans, there has been no recovery. The economy is chugging along like a slug on a pie chart.

The 6.1 million such workers who lost their jobs between 2009 and 2011 were surveyed in January of this year. Of them, roughly 30 percent took jobs that paid less, about 27 percent remained unemployed at the time of the survey and 17 percent stopped looking for work.

Cute puppies and kittens surely are to blame. Obama surely has a super duper wonderful awesome plan that will kick in any day now!

According to a report released this week, incomes have dropped more since the beginning of the recovery than they did during the recession.

Still Bush’s fault? Or the fault of a guy who had no experience in business, never had to hire someone or make a payroll, and has surrounded himself mostly with people whose economic experience was in the classroom, not the boardroom?

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Obamanomics: Most Unemployed Unable To Find A Comparable Job »

Wait, Obama’s America 2016 Could Be #1 Movie This Weekend?

Granted, it’s kind of a lame weekend for new movies, but, this is rather impressive

(Deadline) The anti-Obama movie 2016 Obama’s America went into wider release around America today and is opening right now in first place at the domestic box office. That’s quite a feat since the Rocky Mountain Pictures political documentary is still playing in only 1,090 North American theaters – or about 1/3 as many theaters as big-budget actioner The Expendables 2 (3,355 theaters).

It’s making some respectable money. And probably putting the Left into apoplexy level 10.

Read: Wait, Obama’s America 2016 Could Be #1 Movie This Weekend? »

Hmm: Majority Of Obama’s Twitter Followers Fake?

Much like Obama’s qualifications and policies

(USA Today) President Obama’s Twitter account has 18.8 million followers — but more than half of them really don’t exist, according to reports.

A new Web tool has determined that 70% of Obama’s crowd includes “fake followers,” The New York Times reports in a story about how Twitter followers can be purchased.

“The practice has become so widespread that StatusPeople, a social media management company in London, released a Web tool last month called the Fake Follower Check that it says can ascertain how many fake followers you and your friends have,” the Times reports.

“Fake accounts tend to follow a lot of people but have few followers,” said Rob Waller, a founder of StatusPeople. “We then combine that with a few other metrics to confirm the account is fake.”

So, we can thusly assume that only 30% of Obama’s Twitter followers are in the category of “bat guano crazy zombies”. Good to know!

 

Read: Hmm: Majority Of Obama’s Twitter Followers Fake? »

If All You See…

…is a CO2 infused evil bottle can of beer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Proof Positive, who discusses the Bill Clinton for Obama commercial

Read: If All You See… »

Hotcoldwetdry: Humans Won’t Be Able To Habitate Vast Swaths Of Earth In A Few Decades

So says “trans-partisan activist” (whateverthehell that means) Duane Elgin at the HuffPo

Humanity is converting the Earth into a gas chamber by pouring lethal amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The consequences are profound: Scientists estimate that in less than a single lifetime from now, we will be living in a planet far different from anything that our ancestors have experienced over the past two million years. Bill McKibben’s widely read article, “Global Warming’s Terrifying New Math,” tells our story with the stark simplicity of three numbers:….

In the past, the Earth’s atmosphere was filled with a benevolent and congenial mixture of oxygen, nitrogen, carbon dioxide and other gases that have enabled life to flourish. We are radically changing the mixture and tipping the Earth into a new condition…

Yet, the atmospheric CO2 content for most of the lifespan of the Earth has been much, much higher. Yet, life flourished! Imagine that! Life!

Within a matter of decades, vast areas of the Earth are expected to no longer support human habitation or the plants and animals that have lived there for millennia.

I suggest each and every Warmist immediately dispose of all modern conveniences and live like it’s 2500…..B.C.

This is runaway insanity!

Yes, we have read Warmist prognostications, and I agree, you folks are insane. And massive hypocrites.

What words are adequate to awaken ourselves?

I’d go with “practice what you preach.” Interestingly, throughout the long rant by Duane, he offers exactly zero ideas. Weird.

Read: Hotcoldwetdry: Humans Won’t Be Able To Habitate Vast Swaths Of Earth In A Few Decades »

Polls Find Tight Race, People Want Government To Leave Them Alone

In case you hadn’t noticed, I rarely ever post national polls, because in my mind they mean very little when it comes to the presidential election. Yes, they can give a snapshot of the mood of the nation, but, while we may know the D/R/I samples, we do not know what states these people represent, and the state polls are the ones that matter, due to our Electoral College system. But, a little red meat for a Friday morning

(Fox News) Less than a week before the Republican convention begins, the race for the White House is a virtual tie. According to a Fox News poll of likely voters, the Mitt Romney-Paul Ryan ticket receives the backing of 45 percent, while the Barack Obama-Joe Biden ticket garners 44 percent.

The poll, released Thursday, is the first Fox has conducted among likely voters this year, which means an apples-to-apples comparison can’t be made to previous polls. Likely voters are eligible/registered voters who will most likely cast a ballot in this year’s presidential election.

Romney/Ryan beat out Obama/Biden on handling the economy 45/43 among likely voters. We also learn that among LVs

  • 50% disapprove/46% approve of the job Obama has done.
  • On the economy, the breakdown is 54% disapprove/42% approve of Obama.
  • 46% say the country has been changed for the worse
  • 57% say America is on the decline
  • There’s not a lot of confidence that either candidate would improve a family’s financial situation, though Obama fares several points worse
  • Paul Ryan beats out Joe Biden in every question asked about being VP.

It would be worthwhile digging into the poll and seeing the breakdowns, especially since the D/R/I sample in this poll of likely voters is 42/38/18, with 3% not identifying. We also learn

A Fox News poll asks which of two messages voters would send to the federal government. A 54-percent majority would tell Uncle Sam to “leave me alone,” while 35 percent would ask Washington to “lend me a hand.”

Democrats (59 percent) are nearly four times as likely as Republicans (15 percent) to say they would tell the government to “lend me a hand.”

Likewise, Republicans (80 percent) are about three times as likely as Democrats (27 percent) to say “leave me alone.”

Among independents, the message would be “leave me alone” for more than twice as many as it would be “lend me a hand” (63 percent and 25 percent respectively).

Is anyone particularly shocked that Democrats mostly suffer from needing Big Mommy Government to help them out? The danger for Obama is among independents, who mostly want government to leave them along, and what Obama is pushing is Big Mommy Government.

Read: Polls Find Tight Race, People Want Government To Leave Them Alone »

Politico Offers 4 Roadblocks To Romney’s Energy Plan

Romney just released his detailed energy plan Thursday morning, a 21 page plan that outlines how America can strive for energy independence. Fortunately, Politico is there to attempt to shoot it down just a few hours after it was released, offering four roadblocks

Energy experts say Mitt Romney’s goal to achieve North American energy independence by 2020 would be almost impossible to reach — and anyway, there’s not much in what the Republican candidate laid out Thursday that counts as a concrete plan.

Really? Perhaps we can compare that to the plan released by the Obama administration……pretty weak tea, and no details. And more like a sticky note than a plan. I’m sure the Politico will get right to fisking Obama’s plan. Anyhoo, let’s see those four “roadblocks”

Nursing the oil addiction

Because oil is obviously evil, and they know this by talk to someone in…..the nuclear power industry, who would obviously prefer nuclear power.

But the study’s co-author, Houston-based Pavel Molchanov, said in an interview that even if Romney met his 2020 goal, it wouldn’t be because of anything the Republican did as president.

“It’s due to the U.S. oil industry, which has mastered the very technically sophisticated skill set of developing these unconventional oil resources,” Molchanov said. “President Obama will take credit for an increase in oil supply. Gov. Romney will insist he can accelerate the trend. In actuality these are issues the U.S. government has very little effect on.”

Actually, the policies of government can highly effect the ability to drill and explore. When the private sector is allowed to do these things, we get, shockingly, more energy.

  • Offshore problems would persist – somehow, if they push for more offshore drilling, there will be more problems. And those problems? Enviroweenie groups, who take fossil fueled travel methods to protest and file lawsuits.
  • Drilling plan a ‘nonstarter’ – why? Two words: “Democrat opposition”
  • The rest of North America doesn’t need to cooperate – The Politico actually thinks that Mexico and Canada wouldn’t be interested in pushing towards independence from Middle East oil suppliers, countries that are bound to Islamic terrorism. And, when you add a savvy President and his administration which treats allied countries with respect and honor, and works with them rather than dictating to/blowing them off, things can happen. Good things.

So, let’s sum up: the problems are partly imaginary and partly because of Democrats/liberals. The 5 real roadblocks to energy independence are

  • Democrats/liberals
  • Rewarding campaign contributors with government money to create “green” energy projects which are bound to fail, and even those few that don’t collapse provide little energy and few jobs for huge costs
  • Left side energy policies which increase the price of energy and decrease the availability
  • Enviroweenies who block energy projects, including green energy projects
  • Unicorns don’t actually exist

Also, President Obama, who’s energy plan seems to revolve around properly inflating your tires and telling car companies to raise their fuel standards. Also, refer back to “unicorns don’t actually exist.” Fortunately, this might be a problem that will disappear come January.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Politico Offers 4 Roadblocks To Romney’s Energy Plan »

Pirate's Cove