Gun Rights Group That Almost No One Has Heard Of Backs Manchin-Toomey Legislation

This makes the Liberals at the Washington Post really, really happy, though, really, the Manchin-Toomey legislation is not much more than a token bill, which wouldn’t have stopped Newtown, Aurora, the Gabby Giffords shooting, Nidal Hasan, won’t stop the violence in Chicago, etc

In anticipation of Senate votes this week on a proposed expansion of criminal background checks for firearms sales, one gun rights organization broke with the powerful National Rifle Association on Sunday to urge support for a compromise drafted by Sens. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) and Patrick J. Toomey (R-Pa.).

The endorsement by the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms — which calls itself the second-largest gun rights organization in the country, behind the NRA, claiming 650,000 members and supporters — is one of several moves over the past few days that have provided a boost to the hopes of proponents of background checks.

Actually, that number is closer to 600k than 650k. The NRA has 4 million. And, I don’t know about you, but I’ve never heard of them. That’s not to denigrate them, just point out that they are relatively unknown. Interestingly, the Credentialed Liberal Media ignored the CCRKB when they were writing things like

As far as breaking with the NRA, mentioned in the first paragraph, do reporters ever investigate what they write about, or do the just spin? Because the NRA did not opposed the bill, they just said that it would not stop crime. The Wall Street Journal gets it wrong, too, along with a raft of others.

Anyhow, one of the interesting things that the bill might allow would be reciprocity (which, according to the Constitution, should already be in place), but this would formalize it, meaning people would be allowed to bring their guns and their concealed carry permit to more stringent states.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Gun Rights Group That Almost No One Has Heard Of Backs Manchin-Toomey Legislation »

Watcha Reading?

Nothing I mentioned last week was interesting enough to continue reading, so, I ended up heading off to the library to borrow The Twelve by Justin Cronin, his follow up to The Passage. It was one of those expensive E-books that I refused to pay for, and, quite frankly, I’m glad. While it has held my attention, certainly not worth $13.99 on Kindle (interestingly, it is less through Amazon in hardback). It’s kind confusing in the way the TV show Lost was, and it is a slow read. Especially since I’m not able to read on my Droid like usual. Some of the detail of what’s going on seems to be implied, so you’re left wondering. It’s also long, almost 600 pages. A bit over 2/3rds through it, and started on it on Monday. Whew!

Whatca got?

Read: Watcha Reading? »

Good Grief: Joe Romm, Van Jones Link “Climate Change” To Martin Luther King, Jr.

The very fact that Romm and Jones are writing this should tell you everything you need to know, namely that “climate change” is a purely far left issue based on politics, not science. Oh, and that they have no shame

Martin Luther King And The Call To Direct Action On Climate

Van Jones and I have an op-ed in “The Miami Herald” and many other McClatchy newspapers. I will have more on the moral dimensions of climate change in later posts.

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere,” wrote Martin Luther King Jr. from a Birmingham jail on April 16, 1963. “We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. “The Atlanta-based King was explaining why he was in prison for nonviolent demonstrations so far from home, responding to a critical public statement by eight Southern white religious leaders…

They mention King quite a bit, and tipping points, and climate justice and ignoring science by referring to CO2 as “carbon”. But, then, their target audience is entirely too scientifically illiterate and brainwashed to know or care.

Many have criticized the demonstrations against the Keystone XL pipeline, which would open a major spigot to the Canadian tar sands, as unwarranted and untimely – unwarranted given our broad dependence on fossil fuels and untimely because of our struggling economy. We disagree.

We think there has been far too little direct action, given the staggering scale of the threat….

This is their real point: they’re calling for “direct action”, and when the Typical Leftists become violent, when they destroy property, burn things, etc, the usual from the Left, Romm and Jones can say “well, we were saying peaceful direct action, like when MLK, Jr, was directing it”. It’s “get out of jail free” card for Jones and Romm from what they know will occur. And what they really want to occur.

Read: Good Grief: Joe Romm, Van Jones Link “Climate Change” To Martin Luther King, Jr. »

If All You See…

…is a CO2 infused beer causing the atmosphere to hide its heat in the bottom of the sea, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Real Science, which says that the US used to be much hotter.

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Happy Sunday! Another fantastic day to remember the dream that was the freedom loving nation of the USA. This pinup is by, it looks like, Gil Elvgren, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Megan McCardle writes about why she ignored the Gosnell trial
  2. Raised On Hoecakes discusses the Obama “budget”
  3. The Lonely Conservative notes that kids write the darnedest things
  4. The Other McCain wonders if Amanda Marcotte eats dead babies
  5. This ain’t Hell… notes a nutjob attacking an Army officer
  6. Wizbang wonders if the cloture vote violated the 2nd Amendment
  7. The Daley Gator features vets standing up to the nanny state
  8. Wild Thing points out that Obama hates charities
  9. Sister Toldjah provides the fallout for the man who stole TOTUS
  10. Scared Monkeys discusses yet another wackjob leftists teacher who hates Jews
  11. Right Wing News has a disturbing story on a murderous illegal alien
  12. Maggie’s Notebook says Republicans should just walk away from Gang of 8
  13. Jazz Shaw discusses gun confiscation, which is already happening
  14. Bob Owens discusses a vote to give the UN power over the US
  15. And last, but not least, Gay Patriot points out that Hugo Chavez’s death is hitting NPR hard

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check outwhat I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

The posts do take a long time, so, if you want to send me your links for Rule 5 babeage or links, use ye olde email in the header bar (remove the NOSPAM part). Preferably, create the html link so I can copy and paste how you want it to read.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

NY Times Op-Ed: Bomb North Korea

It’s rare that I somewhat find myself agreeing with far left liberals on an issue, but this op-ed piece by Jeremi Suri is absurd

Bomb North Korea, Before It’s Too Late

The Korean crisis has now become a strategic threat to America’s core national interests. The best option is to destroy the North Korean missile on the ground before it is launched. The United States should use a precise airstrike to render the missile and its mobile launcher inoperable.

President Obama should state clearly and forthrightly that this is an act of self-defense in response to explicit threats from North Korea and clear evidence of a prepared weapon. He should give the leaders of South Korea, Japan, China and Taiwan advance notice before acting. And he should explain that this is a limited defensive strike on a military target — an operation that poses no threat to civilians — and that America does not intend to bring about regime change. The purpose is to neutralize a clear and present danger. That is all.

Lots of yammer after that. Let’s skip to the end

Destroying the North Korean missile before it is launched is the best of bad options on the Korean Peninsula. A prolonged crisis would undermine regional security and global efforts to stop nuclear proliferation. And a future war would be much worse. The most prudent move is to eliminate the most imminent military threat in self-defense, establish clear and reasonable limits on future belligerence, and maintain allied unity for stability — not forced regime change — in the region. This is the kind of pre-emptive action that would save lives and maybe even preserve the uneasy peace on the Korean Peninsula.

Lefties like the Booman Tribune, Political Animal, and Lawyers, Guns, and Money attack Suri himself, and forgot to delve into how insane this policy would be. Here’s Booman

My proposal is to load Jeremi Suri in a missile and launch him into the Pacific Ocean. There he can drown. And we can lose the life of one culpable moron instead of the lives of an incalculable number of innocent people who never recommended starting a war with a nuclear-armed country backed by an even better nuclear-armed country.

If Jeremi Suri is allowed to live it will be an act of mercy. But he should then be forced to wear a Depend Adult Undergarment at all times for the rest of his life.

Hmm, advocating life threatening situations simply because Suri espoused an opinion? How tolerant. What I find myself agreeing with the Liberals on is that this is a monumentally stupid idea. You have a relatively new leader in North Korea, and we all know how mentally stable North Korean leaders have been. You have a country with biological, chemical, and nerve weapons, and most likely nuclear weapons (though not necessarily good ones). You have a country with a big, strong military with lots of conventional weapons, and, unlike Iraq, they seem to take care of their weapons and machines (trucks, planes, etc.) The Korean People’s Army, when you include the active, reserve, and paramilitary, is the largest on earth, comprising 40% of the North Korean citizenry. They have lots and lots of short range rockets easily capable of traveling 40-50 miles or more.

Why is that important? The capital of South Korea, Seoul, is a mere 35 miles south of the DMZ. A city of over 11 million people, plus all those in the surrounding countryside. If there was a precision attack on said missile launcher, what would Kim Jong-un do? Are we willing to take the chance of Seoul being attack with possible WMDs along with lots of conventional weapons? There may come a time when it is necessary to take military action, but this is not it.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: NY Times Op-Ed: Bomb North Korea »

Man Steals Pink Motorized Toy Car

I bet you’re utterly shocked that alcohol was involved

(NJ.com) It’s not a pink Barbie truck, but it’s pretty close.

A Plainfield man was arrested Thursday night after, police say, he drunkenly stole a child’s pink motorized “Trail Princess” quad, drove it down the front porch stairs and startled everyone in the home.

Read: Man Steals Pink Motorized Toy Car »

If All You See…

…is an evil fossil fueled boat and a CO2 infused beer in a flooded world, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Flopping Aces, with a post on the Obama’s tax returns.

Read: If All You See… »

People Predicting Doom For Hurricane Season

Doooooooom!

(Grist) Following a tempestuous 2012, another torrent of hurricanes and superstorms is forecast to crash into the Atlantic coastline this year.

Um, we had Superstorm Sandy, the first big superstorm (which was not a hurricane when it made landfall on the US east coast) since 1991. We had one just barely a hurricane (it can be argued Isaac wasn’t at landfall). There have been no major hurricane landfalls on the US since late 2005, and Isaac was really the first hurricane since 2008. There were only a few tropical systems that even made landfall, or did more than provide some slightly rough seas. That’s “tempestuous”, and what Grist calls “wild” in the headline, apparently. A lower than average season. Which is probably due to “climate change” or something. The link to

From USA Today: Top forecasters predict an above-average 2013 Atlantic hurricane season, with 18 tropical storms forecast, of which nine will be hurricanes.

This comes on the heels of a less-than-stellar forecast in 2012, when nearly twice as many storms formed as had been predicted.

A typical year, based on weather records that go back to 1950, has 12 tropical storms, of which seven are hurricanes. A tropical storm has sustained winds of 39 mph; it becomes a hurricane when its winds reach 74 mph.

One of the great things in these modern days is the ability to see storms that would have been missed in the past, like with satellites and modern shipping.

You have the Weather Channel predicting 16 storms, 9 named, and 5 major. Then we get this

With the Atlantic expected to churn up so many storms this season, it’s highly likely that at least one of them will make landfall in the U.S. From the New Orleans Times-Picayune:

[Klotzbach and Gray] say there is a 96 percent chance of a hurricane hitting somewhere along the U.S. coast, compared to a long-term average of 84 percent, and an 80 percent chance of a hurricane hitting somewhere along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico, compared to the long-term average of 60 percent.

So be ready to batten down the hatches, East Coast. Another wild summer may soon be upon us.

Does anyone else get the feeling that Warmists are really, really, really hoping for a devastating hurricane season, the first since 2005, in order to push their Cult? Remember, they were saying that AGW would cause lots and lots more landfalling hurricanes. Well, that prognostication died after 2005. Then they said there wouldn’t necessarily be more, but they would be more powerful. Well, that died, too. If this year is slow one for landfalls, I’ll put on my Madam Zelda hat and say that the Climate Astrologers will blame “climate change” and come out with all sorts of “studies” to prove it in retrospect. Because hurricanes only started when man made the combustion engine or somethin.

Read: People Predicting Doom For Hurricane Season »

Good News: Saving The Environment Through Sex

No, seriously (via Climate Depot)

(Guardian) “Blood and sperm. The perfect mix,” says a tattooed hippy, as he licks both off his hands, having just had sex with a woman in front of a small audience in a Berlin basement. “Life-giving fluids we are all so afraid of. We’re so afraid of ourselves! It’s all organic.” It’s not everyone’s idea of popular entertainment, but this scene can be experienced at a safe distance in a new documentary, F*ck for Forest, detailing the activities of the group of the same name (without the asterisk). They enjoy confronting society with sex, nudity and bodily fluids, but what Fuck for Forest (FFF) really want to do is save the world. So this isn’t just pervy performance art; it’s also fundraising.

Few people would imagine any overlap exists between pornography and environmentalism, but FFF smash the two concepts together right there in their brutally blunt name. It’s a concise signifier of what they do and how little they care about what you think of it. The live displays are a sideline; funds are primarily raised via their website, which has images and videos of its core staff members and whatever volunteers they pick up on the street in myriad sexual permutations, from naked people up trees to chaotic orgies. Subscribers pay about £10 a month, and the proceeds go towards rainforest conservation projects in South America.

It’s difficult to know how to categorise such an enterprise. Is it kinky eco-activism? Porn for foliage fetishists? Exhibitionism with the fig-leaf of a good cause? FFF have a better question: What is more obscene, they ask, the depiction of people enjoying their sexuality or the destruction of our natural environment?

I’m kinda torn here: are they doing good, or are they a bunch of nuts? On one hand, they kinda want people to live the same lives as the indigenous peoples in the rain forests and get a bit militant in their methods of nudity and sex (read the rest of the Guardian story). On the other hand, they are actually using the money they raise to protect the rainforests in South and Central America to the tune of around $130,000 a year. And, while they’re website doesn’t ever seem to mention “climate change”, they do live a rather austere lifestyle.

Just to be clear, according to their website (FYI, as you could imagine, it is NOT safe for work), they are much more than simply being eco-friendly. Things like “body normalization”, “free love”, and “to be sexual is not a crime” are featured.

So, which is worse, these FFFers who tend to actually care about the environment and do it with “pornography” or the Warmists and environmental groups who preach a lot and demand that you comply while they don’t?

Read: Good News: Saving The Environment Through Sex »

Pirate's Cove