Obama Extolls Independence Day In US While Expressing Concern Over Freedom In Egypt

Mr. “Hi Everybody” trots out his weekly address

Hi everybody.  I hope you all had a safe and happy Fourth of July, filled with parades, cookouts, fireworks and family reunions.

We celebrated at the White House with a few hundred members of the military and their families. And we took a moment amid the festivities to remember what our Independence Day is all about – what happened 237 years ago, and what it meant to the world.

On July 4th, 1776, a small band of patriots declared that we were a people created equal – free to think and worship and live as we please.  It was a declaration heard around the world – that we were no longer colonists, we were Americans, and our destiny would not be determined for us; it would be determined by us.

It was a bold and tremendously brave thing to do.  It was also nearly unthinkable.  At that time, kings and princes and emperors ruled the world.  But those patriots were certain that a better way was possible.  And to achieve it – to win their freedom – they were willing to lay it all on the line.  Their lives.  Their fortunes.  Their sacred honor.

They fought a revolution.  Few would have bet on our side to win.  But for the first of many times to come, America proved the doubters wrong.

Of course, does anyone actually believe Obama believes this? He surely would have allied himself with King George and the over-bearing and unaccountable Colonial governors. But, anyhow, he’s not quite as concerned about Egyptians wanted a non-Islamist democratic model government

(The Hill) President Obama late Wednesday declared himself “very concerned” by the Egyptian military’s overthrow of the country’s democratically elected president and said his administration was reviewing U.S. military aid as a result.

In his first statement since the Egyptian army and the opposition overthrew President Mohamed Morsi and his Muslim Brotherhood government, Obama repeated that the United States was not taking sides in the dispute and avoided using the word “coup.” He called on the military to quickly restore power to a “democratically elected civilian government.”

“The United States is monitoring the very fluid situation in Egypt, and we believe that ultimately the future of Egypt can only be determined by the Egyptian people,” Obama said in a statement. “Nevertheless, we are deeply concerned by the decision of the Egyptian Armed Forces to remove President Morsy and suspend the Egyptian constitution.

It is actually the law to cut off aid after a coup. Will Team Obama deem this a coup? They seem to have more in common with Morsi (or is it “Morsy”?) than with those who would prefer not to have a tyrannical (and Islamist) government. The Daily Beast (surprisingly) takes a harsh look at Obama’s revisionist history regarding Egypt.

Obama has a terrible record when it comes to the Arab Spring, starting with the Iranian Green Revolution. He was always too late, if involved at all…well, except for Libya, where he used US military force to make sure France and Britain continued to get oil from Libya. And how’s Libya looking now? As far as America goes, Obama has virtually eliminated US influence in Egypt, and the Egyptian people showed their derision.

BTW, out of the top ten favorite July 4th moments for the White House, of course 6 of them are about Obama (and the one about visiting the troops in Iraq featured Joe Biden, not Obama).

Read: Obama Extolls Independence Day In US While Expressing Concern Over Freedom In Egypt »

If All You See…

…are the wonderful colors of the United States Flag, you might just be an American Patriot

The blog of the day American Glob, with an awesome patriotic cartoon.

And, yes, more pics below the fold

Read More »

Read: If All You See… »

Independence Day Patriotic Pinup

Happy Independence Day! An excellent day to remember what this nation was founded on. I’ve always liked the above pinup, just seems to encapsulate the holiday. There are a few more of my favorites below the fold.

What’s happening in Ye Old Blogosphere? The Fine Patriotic 21 (worked my way down the feedreader)

  1. American Perspective has patriotic bunnies
  2. Blogs For Victory has the Declaration
  3. Bookworm has Madison Rising’s Star Spangled Banner
  4. Cold Fury notes what it’s all about
  5. Dioneges’ Middle Finger has cheesecake
  6. Flopping Aces also has the Madison Rising SSB, plus more
  7. Jihad Watch discusses the choice between freedom and slavery
  8. Maggie’s Farm has July 4th links
  9. Maggie’s Notebook notes how America became America
  10. Michelle Malkin has thoughts on the day
  11. Political Clown Parade has good wishes
  12. Powerline has the eternal meaning
  13. Randy’s Roundtable has Independence Day wishes
  14. Reaganite Republican has July 4th Funnies
  15. The Astute Bloggers have July 4th music
  16. The Camp of the Saints has July 4th 2013 style
  17. The First Street Journal has Happy Dependence Day
  18. The Jawa Report has birthday wishes
  19. The Daley Gator has the Declaration
  20. The Lonely Conservative wants the government out of your grill
  21. Theo Spark has a somewhat patriotic pic dump
  22. More: The Victory Girls offer Independence Forever
  23. Ninety Miles From Tyranny has freedom from tyranny day
  24. Proof Positive has Ronald Reagan on the price of freedom

Do you have a patriotic post today? Celebrating July 4th? Women in patriotic bikinis? Linkback or drop me an email (wteach(at)thepiratescove.us) and I’ll add you to the list!

Read More »

Read: Independence Day Patriotic Pinup »

Bummer: Sea Rise Worse Than We Thought

And by worse, I mean worse for the disciples of the Cult Of Climate Change

(Daily Caller) When Barack Obama promised to slow the earth’s rising sea levels and heal the planet during the 2008 campaign, he probably had no idea that curbing carbon dioxide emissions might not lower the sea levels.

A study published in the Journal of Geodesy found that the sea level has only risen by 1.7 millimeters per year over the last 110 years — about 6.7 inches per century — all while carbon dioxide concentrations in the air have risen by a third, suggesting that rising carbon concentrations have not impacted the rate at which sea levels are rising.

The study used data from the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment satellite mission and analyzed “continental mass variations on a global scale, including both land-ice and land-water contributions, for 19 continental areas that exhibited significant signals” over a nine-year period from 2002 to 2011.

The results echoed a study conducted last year, which also found that sea level has been rising on average by 1.7 mm/year over the last 110 years. This was also suggested by two other studies conducted in the last decade.

“The latest results show once again that sea levels are not accelerating after all, and are merely continuing their modest rise at an unchanged rate,” said Pierre Gosselin, who runs the climate skeptic blog NoTricksZone. “The more alarmist sea level rise rates some have claimed recently stem from the use of statistical tricks and the very selective use of data. Fortunately, these fudged alarmist rates do not agree with real-life observations. Overall the latest computed rates show that there is absolutely nothing to be alarmed about.”

Well, that’s just a fastball to the groin, wouldn’t you say, Warmists?

Of course, Warmists will say “see? We were right. The sea level is going up!” Yes, yes it is. Alas, what this confirms is that global sea level rise is pretty much within the statistical norm. What does that mean? Essentially, over the last 7,000-8,000 years the sea rise has been estimated to be an average of 6-8 inches per century. The reason that time frame is used is due to the effects of the ending of the last glacial age leveling off. From around 20k years ago, the sea rose roughly up to 140 meters (459 feet) in roughly 13,000 years, heading into the Holocene.

Now, think back to math class: how does one arrive at an average? We take a bunch of numbers, add them together, and divide by the number of data points. What this means is that during the past 7-8K years, there have been times where sea rise has been much higher warm periods), and times where much lower, perhaps even negative (cool periods). Yet, this warm period is simply average regarding sea rise.

Of course, what Warmists will tell us … if they even acknowledge the study… is that maybe it’s at the lower edge of average now, but in the future, dooooooom! And then they’ll jump in their fossil fueled SUVs to run errands.

PS: Just to be perfectly clear, the Earth is currently in a warm period, which could last for another couple hundred years, but, once again, we see that it is primarily natural, not driven by CO2.

Read: Bummer: Sea Rise Worse Than We Thought »

On Independence Day, Liberals Can’t Help Being Jerks

What is it about July 4th that brings out the worst in Liberals? For a party that says they are “progressive” and future looking, they sure seem to focus on all the bad that has occurred, and whine and whine and whine. The Washington Post features not one, not two, but three negative pieces (in fairness, they have a few positive pieces, but why bother with the negative on this day?). First, here’s the Editorial Board whining about the Declaration of Independence

“WE HOLD THESE truths to be sacred and undeniable,” Thomas Jefferson wrote in his first draft of the Declaration of Independence (the composition of which was regarded as something of a minor administrative chore, as noted by the historian Joseph Ellis). He showed the draft to John Adams and Benjamin Franklin, who suggested “self-evident” instead — perhaps a polite way of saying to the British crown: “as any fool can plainly see.” Although Jefferson (uncharacteristically) accepted the change without complaint, the “truths” that all men are created equal and endowed with certain unalienable rights were not self-evident to everyone, even in the American colonies, where a sizable part of the population was loyal to Great Britain and a great many more simply wanted the revolutionary turmoil to end so things could get back to normal.

The obvious contradiction of the Declaration’s fine sentiments — the institution of slavery — had to be swept under the rug in 1776 lest southerners withdraw from the fragile and sometimes fractious coalition that was forming behind the idea of independence….

Here’s E.J. Dionne Jr calling for Marxism

Last week, the Aspen Institute gathered a politically diverse group of Americans under the banner of the “Franklin Project,” named after Ben, to declare a commitment to offering every American between the ages of 18 and 28 a chance to give a year of service to the country. The opportunities would include service in our armed forces but also time spent educating our fellow citizens, bringing them health care and preventive services, working with the least advantaged among us, and conserving our environment.

Yes, he does mean the military, in terms of Lefties joining in order to liberalize the institution. Add in the far left service stuff. And here’s the kicker: The American Revolution Was a Flop

The easiest way of assessing whether the United States would have been better off without its revolution is to look at those English-speaking countries that rejected the American Revolution and retained the monarchy, particularly Canada, which experienced an influx of American refugees after the British defeat. The U.S. performance should also be assessed against the ideals the new country set for itself — namely, advancing life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Lot’s of whines about slavery, which the writer, a Canadian, acknowledges was defeated during the Civil War. Complaints about citizens being incarcerated (no mention that liberal justice system policies makes this worse). Whines about this, whines about that.

Which brings us to the related matter of the revolution’s long-term impact on politics. While the Canadian, Australian and British governments have shown they can get things done, including passing tough austerity budgets in recent years, the norm in Washington has become paralyzing partisanship and gridlock.

In these senses, the American Revolution was a flop. Perhaps it’s time for Americans to accept that their revolution was a failure and renounce it. (For their part, many Russians have.)

I’ll resist the notion to smack this Canuck around while insulting Canada: it’s not Canada’s fault that the WP published this drivel for Independence Day.

Many other papers have pulled the same thing, negative articles and op-eds. Kudos to the NY Times for avoiding this (except for one linking slavery to the American Revolution.) Here’s their Editorial Board

There is something self-evident about the Fourth of July. We know its origin and its meaning. Its iconography is straightforward, even if the text behind it — the Declaration — is complex. It retains a simplicity that resembles no other major holiday. It celebrates a vital principle, but it is lacking in rites and ritual. We set aside the day, which seems to include a bit of everything — family, patriotism, parades, and simply doing nothing. Yet you could say its significance can be found in the doings of any ordinary American day — something that’s all too easy to forget until July Fourth comes along as a reminder.

I’m going to avoid what the loonies at the Left wing blogs say, however, if you want the most loony tunes piece, here you go

That’s why I’ll do no flag waving or banner display. I’ll recite no Pledges of Allegiance, nor stand for the Star Spangled Banner. Patriotic speeches and other jingoistic claptrap will draw no applause from me.

There’s so much loony (in some cases, wrapped around real issues) in the piece that I couldn’t even figure out what to excerpt, so I simply went with the the above. Whines about Vietnam, complaints about America in 3rd world countries, drones, rendition, Dick Cheney, Bush, the 2000 Election, and so much more (but never mentions Obama by name) from Mike Rivage-Seul, who is a liberation theologian (read: far far left moonbat), who, really, just put into words what so many Liberals think. Yet, he’s still here living in the United States, a country he seems to hate. Much like other Lefties, who never seem to leave the country they despise.

Want to piss a liberal off today? Wave the flag

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: On Independence Day, Liberals Can’t Help Being Jerks »

Delaying The Employer Mandate Was A Huge Mistake By Team Obama

Like you, I’ve had time today to listen to the talking heads and read the blog posts on Obama delaying the rollout of the employer mandate (read Gabriel Malor’s discussion of what the mandate is). Erika Johnson has a good breakdown as to the massive job losses that will now be put off till after the 2014 midterms. Team O and the Democrats surely do not want the optics of lots and lots of layoffs couple with employees being downgraded from full to part time, plus all the lawsuits that would be filed, as they attempt to retake the House.

However, I believe Team O made a huge, huge mistake. First, it violates the law. The January 1, 2014 date is not a deadline that can be pushed off. It’s Christmas, it’s your birthday, your anniversary, tax day. It’s a scheduled court date. It’s “your power bill is due on..” There is no latitude. I’m interested to see what their excuse is for violating the very law they pushed for and extolled for years.

Second, this gives Republicans a huge talking point for the mid-terms. I suspect that Team O thought they were picking the lesser of two evils, the other being to let it start and deal with the fallout, and see a big Tea Party turnout. However, Conservatives will be out in force either way: this might bring lots more independents and moderates out to vote against Democrats, will leaving Dems sitting at home. Think of this talking point from Republicans:

Folks, you have a choice: you can vote for the Party which passed a bill that was so huge, so unwieldy, so damaging, so job killing, so impossible to implement that Democrat President Obama decided to violate the hard implementation date and push it off till 2015, after the elections occur, telling people that this was really, really hard to implement. Who would have thought a 2,000+ page bill which has generated over 20,000 pages of regulations (it will probably be more by election day) would be so difficult to implement?

Obamacare was opposed by the majority of Americans before it was passed, and hasn’t become anymore popular since. Sure, there are some parts that are popular, designed in the same way one might grind up horrible tasting medicine and mixing it with honey. Republicans have stood with you and attempted to repeal and replace Obamacare with common sense solutions. Democrats have stood with Mr. Obama on Obamacare, except when they need to get elected, then they don’t want to talk about it. “Obamacare? What’s that? Never heard of it” they’ll say.

Obama and the Democrats told us if we didn’t pass this citizens would die. Yet, they provided waiver after waiver for their campaign donors. Now they push the employer mandate off for a year….after the election….so doesn’t that mean, by their own talking points, that they want citizens to die?

Democrats are either playing games, trying to minimize the true pain that is caused by Obamacare in order to win the elections, or they’ve created a monstrosity that is impossible to implement. More than likely, both. Are these the types of people you want to trust in government?

Or something like that. I’m not a politician, I don’t speak politician.

I also have to wonder if Congressional Democrats were blindsided by this, and not just the rank and file, but Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid too boot. Obama’s relationship with them hasn’t been much better than his relationship with Congressional Republicans. Heck, Bush might have had a better relationship with Pelosi than Obama does. And their strategists might well be saying this is worse. If employers were laying people off and/or reducing hours down to part time, they could demonize the private sector. Not now.

We’ll see if Republicans have the fortitude to attack and demonize when election season is upon us. Or whether they’ll get squishy.

Read: Delaying The Employer Mandate Was A Huge Mistake By Team Obama »

If All You See…

…is snow that is caused by too much heat because someone used their hair dryer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is All American Blogger, which notes that regulations may have killed Google Reader.

Read: If All You See… »

Bummer: NY Times Says Planet To Burn Up If We Don’t Switch To Expensive Alternatives

Now we have Thomas Friedman hyperventilating

But I would not get caught up in the anti-carbon pollution details of the president’s speech. I’d focus on the larger messages. The first is that we need to reorder our priorities and start talking about the things that are most consequential for our families, communities, nation and world. That starts with how we’re going to power the global economy at a time when the planet is on track to grow from seven billion to nine billion people in 40 years, and most of them will want to live like Americans, with American-style cars, homes and consumption patterns. If we don’t find a cleaner way to grow, we’re going to smoke up, choke up and burn up this planet so much faster than anyone predicts. That traffic jam on the Beijing-Tibet highway in 2010 that stretched for 60 miles, involved 10,000 vehicles and took 10 days to unlock is a harbinger of what will come.

Doom. I guess Thomas missed that there has been no statistically significant warming in over 15 years, and, really, since there’s been a minor 0.28F increase since 1990, despite the increase in atmospheric CO2, we can almost say no significant warming since 1990. Much of it was due to naturally occurring El Ninos occurring during what is a primarily natural long term warming trend since the end of the Little Ice Age.

But there is one more huge caveat: We also have to ensure that cheap natural gas displaces coal but doesn’t also displace energy efficiency and renewables, like solar or wind, so that natural gas becomes a bridge to a clean energy future, not a ditch. It would be ideal to do this through legislation and not E.P.A. fiat, but Republicans have blocked that route, which is pathetic because the best way to do it is with a Republican idea from the last Bush administration: a national clean energy standard for electricity generation — an idea the G.O.P. only began to oppose when Obama said he favored it.

It could be that Republicans are blocking this because we’ve seen Obama waste tens of billions on these projects while sending the federal taxpayer money to campaign donors with “green” companies. Then the companies shut down. The jobs do not appear. And then we see this

The US has had wind farms since 1981, what the left and the green movement don’t want to talk about regarding windmills is (as usual) the truth. The truth is: windmills, like solar panels, break down. And like solar panels, windmills produce less energy before they break down than the energy it took to make them. That’s the part liberals forget: making windmills and solar panels takes energy, energy from coal, oil, and diesel, energy that extracts and refines raw materials, energy that transports those materials to where they will be re-shaped into finished goods, energy to manufacture those goods. More energy than those finished windmills and solar panels will ever produce.

There are many hidden truths about the world of wind turbines from the pollution and environmental damage caused in China by manufacturing bird choppers, the blight on people’s lives of noise and the flicker factor and the countless numbers of birds that are killed each year by these blots on the landscape. The symbol of Green renewable energy, our saviour from the non existent problem of Global Warming, abandoned wind farms are starting to litter the planet as globally governments cut the subsidies taxes that consumers pay for the privilege of having a very expensive power source that does not work every day for various reasons like it’s too cold or the wind speed is too high.

The US experience with wind farms has left over 14,000 wind turbines abandoned and slowly decaying, in most instances the turbines are just left as symbols of a dying Climate Religion, nowhere have the Green Environmentalists appeared to clear up their mess or even complain about the abandoned wind farms.

As pointed out in the Mad, Mad, Mad World of Climatism, wind power requires the highest ground footprint of any energy source, yet still cannot generate the same power. It’s capacity factor is about 37%, versus natural gas with is about 87%, meaning that a 1,000 megawatt facility will generate about 370 megawatts. The same natural gas facility would generate 870 megawatts, yet take up less than 1 square mile to over 90 square miles for the wind farm. Wind is dependent on, well, the wind blowing within a certain range. If it is too windy they do not work, same as when not windy. The storage capacity for wind farms is virtually non-existent (hence the reason I say the research should go more into single home/small building style projects). The turbines last, at best, 30 years, leaving a rusting hulk sitting on a massive concrete slab blighting the landscape.

Eventually the alternatives will work and displace oil, coal, natural gas, even perhaps nuclear. They aren’t ready for primetime as of yet, and what all these government decrees will do is skyrocket the cost of living.

Read: Bummer: NY Times Says Planet To Burn Up If We Don’t Switch To Expensive Alternatives »

Surprise! Obama Delays Employer Mandate Until After 2014 Midterms

First Democrats wrote Obamacare to make sure that the painful parts would start after the 2012 election, now Team Obama looks to make sure that the employer mandate kicks in after the midterms. Kudos to The Hill for pointing this out in their headline.

The ObamaCare employer mandate requiring businesses to provide their workers with health insurance will be delayed by a year, the administration said Tuesday in a stunning announcement.

Delaying the requirement until 2015 is an enormous victory for businesses that had lobbied against the healthcare law.

It also means that one of healthcare reform’s central requirements will be implemented after the 2014 midterm elections, when the GOP is likely to use the Affordable Care Act as a vehicle to attack vulnerable Democrats.

In a White House blog post, senior adviser Valerie Jarrett wrote that the administration believed it needed to give employers “more time to comply with the new rules.”

As some Tweeters have pointed out, what about the delay for individuals? Consider, the Supreme Court just offered their ruling on DOMA, which noted that everyone should be treated equally under federal law in striking down part of DOMA. Does this not seem like inequality? Others note that, as Obama put it, it’s the law

Now why would you expect Obama and the Dems to follow the law they passed?

“This allows employers the time to test the new reporting systems and make any necessary adaptations to their health benefits while staying the course toward making health coverage more affordable and accessible for their workers,” Jarrett wrote Tuesday evening.

Jarrett also wrote that the delay would help in “cutting red tape and simplifying the reporting process.”

HHS and other federal government agencies under Obama’s rule have failed time and time again to meet their deadlines, plus they keep adding thousands and thousands of pages of regulation to what was already a 2,000 page bill.

What this also means is that the deep pocketed businesses will have to wait an extra year before they can file lawsuits. Remember, what the SCOTUS ruling meant (thanks, John Roberts) was that individuals/enities had to have standing to file a suit, whereby they have actually been hit with the effects of Obamacare. It’s easier for big companies to file and maintain suits than individuals.

Read: Surprise! Obama Delays Employer Mandate Until After 2014 Midterms »

NC Senate Adds Common Sense Abortion Restrictions To Sharia Law Bill

When I first saw this article at both WRAL and the Raleigh News and Observer, I was really hoping that there would be a Memeorandum thread, with a whole bunch of liberals freaking out over what are common sense restrictions. I got the first, but not the second. From the N&O

A bill restricting abortions that popped up in the state Senate without public notice Tuesday evening and received swift approval would force clinics to meet expensive license requirements and make it more difficult for doctors to perform the procedures.

Hmm, license requirements for what are medical procedures? Scary!

Under the bill, which was tacked onto another measure dealing with Islamic law, abortion clinics would have to meet license standards similar to those of ambulatory surgical centers. According to legislative staff, only one clinic in the state currently meets that standard. The state’s four Planned Parenthood clinics don’t meet it. The bill would also require doctors to be present when women take drugs that induce abortions.

One would think that the liberal abortionistas would want to make sure women are protected while having a medical procedure. Just the tone of the N&O story tells me that’s not the case.

Democrats said Republican arguments about safety were a sham, and the real incentive is to restrict abortions.

“This is really about limiting women’s rights,” said Sen. Angela Bryant, a Rocky Mount Democrat.

Over half the article is about Democrat whining over the proposed legislation and being “outraged”, which requires one more vote in the Senate before heading to the House. But, what does it all do? To the WRAL article, which lists a few of the provisions

  • CONSCIENCE PROTECTION: Any health care provider, not just doctors and nurses, would be allowed to opt out of providing abortion-related services.
  • ABORTION FUNDING LIMITS: The bill would prohibit health plans offered on the federal health care exchanges from offering abortion coverage. It would also prohibit state funds from being spent for abortions, except to save the life of the mother or in cases of rape or incest. (and no state or county taxpayer funded abortions)
  • SEX-SELECTIVE ABORTIONS: The measure prohibits doctors from performing an abortion if they know the woman seeking it is doing so because of the gender of the baby.
  • DOCTORS: Doctors would be required to remain in the room for the entire abortion procedure, whether surgical or medical / chemical.
  • TRANSFER AGREEMENTS: Abortion clinics would be required to have “transfer agreements” with local hospitals.

Added to this is the licensing provision previously mentioned. Do any of those provisions actually restrict abortion on demand? Or do they simply make sure that the procedures are safer and that women are protected? As one of the comments at WRAL notes “There should not be any objections to these practical requirements… unless the health and safety of the mother is not really important.” The N&O commenters, mostly far lefties, barely mention the abortion issues, and instead focus on the main idea of the bill, noting that foreign laws, like Sharia law, will not be applied in North Carolina.

The Raw Story, another good reliable moonbat site says the bill would force all but one infanticide, er, abortion clinic to close. First, why do liberals hate women so much that they do not want the clinics to be safe? 2nd, is anyone surprised that none of the states’ four Planned Parenthood offices would meet the licensing guidelines? Liberals want lemonade stands licensed, but not abortion clinics.

Buzzfeed has copies of the bills.

What we see here as that, except for a small minority of Democrats, such as Kirstin Powers, Democrats will not except any common sense solutions to abortion whatsoever. They yammer on about “common sense gun laws” and try and pass those, even though there are already lots and lots and lots of laws about guns, yet, allowing health care providers to refuse to perform an abortion? Heresy!

As a sidebar, an Ohio right to life group trolls the heck out of a few Ohio Democrats who voted for abortion restrictions.

More: here we go, more unhinged abortion on demanders chime in.

  • Dave posting at Alan Colmes’ spot: Irony: NC Republicans Sneak Fundamentalist Anti-Choice Amendment Into State ‘Anti-Sharia’ Bill (I’m guessing Dave has no idea what is in the bill, and will not reply to my comment to his post)
  • Crooks and Liars is freaking, especially in the comments and tweets from Senator Kay Hagin (D-NC)
  • No More Mister Nice Blog fails to notice that abortion clinics can, in fact, upgrade to pass the licensing provision. You know, like how Obamacare throws provision after provision after provision at citizens, companies, insurance companies, health care providers…

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: NC Senate Adds Common Sense Abortion Restrictions To Sharia Law Bill »

Pirate's Cove