Good News: Paul Ryan, GOP Leadership Set To Push Another Bad Immigration Plan

First off, there’s this

(Washington Times) Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus said Wednesday that there’s a “general consensus” in his party that something big needs to happen on overhauling the country’s immigration laws and that more specifics would be unveiled this week at House Republicans’ annual retreat.

“I think politically speaking it’s a mixed bag, but the question is whether or not it’s something we have to do as a country, and I think that’s what’s trumping the political answer,” Mr. Priebus said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” “You see in our party, whether it’s [Kentucky Senator] Rand Paul, who’s called for massive immigration reform, or [Florida Senator] Marco Rubio, I think you have general consensus that something big has to happen.”

Earlier in the day I noted a WSJ/NBC poll on American priorities, in relationship to “climate change” being dead last. Well, passing new immigration legislation was second to last. But, the GOP feels that they need to Do Something, and rather than getting tough, taking a stand for being a Nation Of Law over a Nation Of Men, it appears as if they’re moving down Squishy Lane towards Democratville (via Hot Air)

Ryan confirms GOP “principles” will include legal status for the 11 million, but he also says this will be a ”probationary status” to make sure the 11 million will not be “preferenced over people who did follow the laws.” It’s important to have confirmation that there will be a way out of the shadows. But the probationary period idea is problematic. Details will matter, but it would probably allow for people to get the right to work up front, but they could be kicked off of probationary status if certain security benchmarks aren’t met.

Advocates see this as bad policy: Why would undocumenteds step forward, if they know they can lose work status and get deported later because of nothing that they did, but only because Washington failed to decide certain metrics had been fulfilled?

However, Ryan also says the undocumented will be allowed to work as part of “probationary” status before security benchmarks are met. “You can be on probation,” Ryan says, “while the border is being secured.”

Ed Morrissey notes

Solution: No one comes out of the shadows until the border’s secured. The status quo on legalization holds in the meantime. There’s no rational reason why a country needs to make concessions to illegals before, or concurrent with, strengthening its borders, just as there’s no rational reason to think the GOP would use the security trigger to delay legalization ad infinitum. Everyone understands the demographic realities of the last election. Everyone knows how eager the Republican establishment is to attract Latino voters. And everyone knows how gleefully Democrats will demagogue them for dragging their feet on legalization while the border saga is playing out. Left to their own devices, Republicans would legalize illegals sooner rather than later. There’s no similar reason to believe that Democrats, left to their own devices, would eventually get around to tackling the border once legalization happened.

He also points out that this is pretty much the same kind of mule fritters encapsulated within the Gang Of 8 bill. But, really, don’t think Democrats will allow this to happen

(The Hill) House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Wednesday amplified the Democrats’ insistence that an immigration reform package include a pathway to citizenship for the nation’s illegal immigrants.

All Dems want are new voters beholden to the Dem Party. Republicans seem to think they’ll get some out of it. Neither of them are serving the purposes of the Constitution and law, nor the legal citizens of the USA

Read: Good News: Paul Ryan, GOP Leadership Set To Push Another Bad Immigration Plan »

If All You See…

…is a world killing bottle of water made from plastic!!!!!!!, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Nice Deb, with a post noting that Obama may have plagiarized part of Bush’s 2007 SOTU.

Read: If All You See… »

What Say To The TSA Being More Polite As They Grope You?

There could be legislation for that

(The Hill) Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) is threatening to introduce a bill requiring the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to be more polite to airline passengers.

During a hearing about the TSA’s Screening Partnership Program that took place this week, Connolly said passengers would likely cooperate more with TSA agents if the agency’s workers used better manners when they deliver their instructions.

“There’s no excuse for someone barking orders continuously at the public at any airport in America who is an employee of the federal government, or a contractor for the federal government,” Connolly said. “I’d lose my job if I treated the public that way and rightfully so. My staff would be fired if I find that they treated my public that way.”

In the public sector, you’d lose your job for groping people, much less being rude. You might face criminal charges and/or a lawsuit. Heck, there have been plenty of lawsuits where law enforcement officials have been sued for groping citizens. Would it really make any difference if they were more polite as they grope you? It might a little bit. When I received an enhanced pat-down at LAX back in 2010 (I have a stainless steel rod in my leg which usually sets off the machines), the TSA agent avoided “personal” areas and had the good sense to be polite and contrite. I had the feeling that he really, really did not want to be doing this.

Do we really need legislation to tell the TSA to be polite to citizens? If so, that should tell you something about the culture of the TSA. Now, if Connolly really wants to do something, he should add in that the enhanced pat-downs should be done behind screens, rather than having everyone in the airport watch people get groped. Second, there needs to be some serious common sense in exactly who gets the EPDs.

And maybe understand who we really need to be worried about are not the ones getting groped. But should be.

Also, to diverge a bit, perhaps he could have a talk with Mr. Obama, who seems to like to treat American’s who disagree with him in a rather shoddy manner.

Read: What Say To The TSA Being More Polite As They Grope You? »

Climate Change Is Dead Last On List Of American’s Priorities

Surprise? This comes via The Hockey Schtick, a Wall Street Journal poll on the state of the union and what Americans care about, along with Obama’s approval rating. Here’s the chart

Humorously, when Obama started yammering about “climate change” the Gore Effect kicked in, with light snow starting in D.C.

And why should people care? Warmists refuse to make their own lives “carbon neutral”. They won’t give up their own fossil fueled vehicles and travel. And Warmists continuously change the data

Multiple U.S. government bureaucracies including NOAA, NASA, and the Department of Energy are again being accused of inappropriately manipulating temperature data — or “adjusting” it, as officials at the agencies implicated in the scandal put it — to show global warming. While the accusations are not new, the latest scandal, sparked by an in-depth analysis of the data by independent analyst Steven Goddard at Real Science, relies on official records to suggest that federal agencies have been fudging temperature measurements to make past decades seem colder and recent years appear warmer.

Numerous scientists and experts confirmed Goddard’s explosive findings, but in separate responses to The New American, both NOAA and NASA attempted to downplay the significance of the accusations. The major problems identified by Goddard in the temperature records of federal bureaucracies relate to the U.S. Historical Climatology Network (USHCN), the official data-set covering the continental United States. While the agencies admit the records are adjusted, Goddard and multiple scientists suggested that biased methodology was used to adjust the data to show an unjustified and “spurious” warming trend.

The data is constantly being changed, typically cooling the past and warming the most recent years. The data is the data. If you change it again and again and again, that certain opens up the allegation that this is no longer science. But, then, it isn’t: “climate change” is about politics. Period.

Read: Climate Change Is Dead Last On List Of American’s Priorities »

Unsurprisingly, Obama Uses SOTU To Vow To Go It Alone

He literally created obstructionism by declaring that everyone hates his agenda. Because that’s what he does. Even on the few occasions he’s supposedly reached out (remember the “charm offensive”?) he’s coupled that with the same bitter, confrontational tone. And, no, I did not watch the his wish-list of partisan rancor, there’s no way I could take 45 minutes or so of him, and the NJ Devils were hell bent on losing to the Blues, but I can read a transcript

(NY Times) After five years of fractious political combat, President Obama declared independence from Congress on Tuesday as he vowed to tackle economic disparity with a series of limited initiatives on jobs, wages and retirement that he will enact without legislative approval.

Promising “a year of action” as he tries to rejuvenate a presidency mired in low approval ratings and stymied by partisan stalemates, Mr. Obama used his annual State of the Union address to chart a new path forward relying on his own executive authority. But the defiant “with or without Congress” approach was more assertive than any of the individual policies he advanced.

He’s essentially declared that he won’t work with Congress. So, the only difference between now and before is his openly declaring this during a State Of The Union speech. Because he’s been declaring this off and on since 2011. Doing it during the SOTU, though, was a direct shot that Mr. Obama, a supposed Constitutional scholar, will burn the Constitution in favor of a unilateral dictator-lite manner.

Furthermore, declaring that he won’t work with Congress gives Congress no reason to want to work with him. As it is, even his fellow Democrats in Congress typically want him to stay away during negotiations, as Obama tends to gum up the works. He’s a poor negotiator with, surprisingly for any politician, poor interpersonal people skills. He has no real network to the elected officials of either Party.

“I’m eager to work with all of you,” a confident Mr. Obama told lawmakers of both parties in the 65-minute nationally televised speech in the House chamber. “But America does not stand still — and neither will I. So wherever and whenever I can take steps without legislation to expand opportunity for more American families, that’s what I’m going to do.”

Building a contradiction into a pledge to work with Congress as poor leadership. Is anyone surprised in the least that Obama’s leadership skills have improved not a whit since his 2009 coronation?

The rest was mostly the typical Obama idiocy. While there were some nice points, such as the honoring of Army Ranger Cory Remsburg, an true hero, there were also lots of inaccuricies. And some like this

He touched on foreign policy, asserting that “American diplomacy backed by the threat of force” had forced Syria to give up chemical weapons and that “American diplomacy backed by pressure” had brought Iran to the negotiating table.

On Syria, it was, sadly, Soviet strongman Vladimir Putin who rescued Obama’s bacon, but the war still rages, and they haven’t actually given up their real WMD. As for Iran, the supposed gains were done by giving the house away. Per Iran, this deal essentially means nothing, that they can make a nuclear weapon at any time, and Team Obama refuses to release the text of the deal, meaning no one can see if Iran is full of it or the deal is super awesome for Iran.

But Mr. Obama’s message centered on the wide gap between the wealthiest and other Americans as he positioned himself as a champion of those left behind in the modern economy. “Those at the top have never done better,” he said. “But average wages have barely budged. Inequality has deepened. Upward mobility has stalled.

“The cold, hard fact is that even in the midst of recovery, too many Americans are working more than ever just to get by, let alone to get ahead,” he added. “And too many still aren’t working at all. So our job is to reverse these trends.”

Funny, because this is happening under Obama’s economic policies. He’s admitting his policies are terrible. Good thing he’s planning on making it worse.

He barely touched on his signature legislation, Obamacare, waiting til 40 minutes into his grandstanding. His yammering on “climate change” was typical Warmists idiocy. As I noted at WUWT

Obama: “Climate change is a fact. And when our children’s children look us in the eye…”

…they’ll wonder why a guy with a carbon footprint estimated at 41,000 tons, who sends his family and dogs off on separate flights for vacations in far off ritzy spots, who takes crosscountry flights to give 30 minute speeches, who keeps the White House at a toasty 77F, and who goes to the golf course every couple of weeks in a 17 vehicle motorcade has the cajones to lecture anyone.

Ted Cruzhttp://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-admin/post-new.php

The president’s taste for unilateral action to circumvent Congress should concern every citizen, regardless of party or ideology. The great 18th-century political philosopher Montesquieu observed: “There can be no liberty where the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or body of magistrates.” America’s Founding Fathers took this warning to heart, and we should too.

Rule of law doesn’t simply mean that society has laws; dictatorships are often characterized by an abundance of laws. Rather, rule of law means that we are a nation ruled by laws, not men. That no one—and especially not the president—is above the law. For that reason, the U.S. Constitution imposes on every president the express duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”

Obama doesn’t care. He’s from the Progressive school, what Jonah Goldberg terms “nice fascism”. He cares little for anything other than Obama. And if one vows to go it alone, to isolate themselves, they shouldn’t be surprised when that’s exactly what happens, and no one wants to play with him anymore.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Unsurprisingly, Obama Uses SOTU To Vow To Go It Alone »

Global Warming To Close Florida Schools

Won’t somebody please think of the children?

(Click Orlando) Schools, courts and government offices throughout the western Florida Panhandle plan to close because of anticipated snow and ice as a polar vortex grips much of the country.

The National Weather Service has issued a winter storm watch for the region. Forecasters say a mix of freezing rain and snow is expected Tuesday through Wednesday.

Schools in Santa Rosa and Escambia counties will be closed those days. Courts and many government offices also announced closures in advances of the wintry weather.

Those are the two western-most counties in Florida, up in the Panhandle. There are also closings in New Orleans and Mississippi from global warming created snow, ice, and cold. When Warmists told us that snow would be a thing of the past, I didn’t realize they were referring to the time when the Earth was in a cold age.

Read: Global Warming To Close Florida Schools »

Good Grief: Eugene Robinson Blames Cold On “Climate Change”

Of course, there’s absolutely nothing crazy at all about blaming cold on heat trapping gasses, you guys!

Dire signs from a warming world

Another insane cold wave — not the infamous “polar vortex ” but its evil twin — is bringing sub-zero and single-digit temperatures to much of the nation. And global warming may be even more extreme, and potentially more catastrophic, than climate scientists had feared.

This is, of course, no contradiction. The rallying cry of the denialists — “It’s really cold outside, so global warming must be a crock!” — can be taken seriously only by those with a toddler’s limited conception of time and space. They forget that it’s winter, and apparently they don’t quite grasp that even when it’s cold in one part of the world, it can be hot in another.

Read: Good Grief: Eugene Robinson Blames Cold On “Climate Change” »

Al Gore: We Really Need To Control Africa’s Population

Al Gore pops his head up at Davos…say, how’d he get there? A fossil fueled flight?…to make a racist pronouncement (via Climate Depot)

(CNBC) Stopping overpopulation is one way the dangers of climate change can be mitigated, according to two of the most prominent believers in global warming.

Former Vice President Al Gore and Microsoft founder Bill Gates (how did Gates get to Davos? Anyone think he flew commercial?) said at the World Economic Forum in Davos that contraception is a key in controlling the proliferation of unusual weather they say is endangering the world.

“Depressing the rate of child mortality, educating girls, empowering women and making fertility management ubiquitously available, so women can chose how many children and the spacing of children… is crucial to the future shape of human civilization,” said Gore, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007 for his work on global warming.

Gore said Africa’s population is expected to surpass India’s and China’s by the mid-21st century and will be more than both combined by the end of the century.

The video of him speaking is here, starts at the 15 minute mark. Had anyone on the political Right said this, much less a former US Vice President, they would immediately be labeled a racist for wanting to reduce the population of Africa, which is largely populated by Black people and Arabs.

(The Reference Frame) Al Gore started to talk around 14:55 in the video above and advocated “fertility management” in Africa, something that sounds scary. You could think that he has explicitly talked about forced sterilization but he actually hasn’t – he has left the issue of the methods ambiguous. At any rate, it is very clear that he is obsessed with the idea of the reduction of the number of Africans and in this sense, he is no different than the German Nazis who wanted to gradually phase out Slavs on their stolen territories. (snip)

It is impossible not to think that there’s some racism and stunning hypocrisy if a jerk who has produced four children is “working” on the reduction of the number of newborn babies in a completely different nation.

Warmists have long advocated for population reduction for Other People, being extensively linked to the rest of the Progressive agenda, which includes abortion on demand and forced sterilization along racist lines, as the early founders of this movement were eugenicists and racists, particularly against Blacks. Yet, these same Warmists mostly refuse to take themselves out of the gene pool. Many have several children.

“These extreme weather events which are now 100 times more common than 30 years ago are really waking people’s awareness all over the world, and I think that is a game-changer,” Gore said.

Except they aren’t. Unless you count below average temperatures as extreme. And the Gore Effect is in play in Davos, with the daily high temperatures being below average (around 32F-42F for this part of January, depending on the source) for the past few days and expected to be below 27F as a high for the next ten days, with many days into the teens. And snowing every day, which isn’t that unusual.

Anyhow, no one should be surprised that Gore has gone racist.

Read: Al Gore: We Really Need To Control Africa’s Population »

Autocrat-lite POTUS To Unilaterally Raise Minimum Wage For Federal Contractors

I’m sure Team Obama gave long, careful thought to this, weighing the pros and cons, considering the costs….or, really, sat around in a bull session which included political wonks, none with any experience in the private market, saying “how can we pump up he moonbat base”?

(NY Times) President Obama plans to sign an executive order requiring that janitors, construction workers and others working for federal contractors be paid at least $10.10 an hour, using his own power to enact a more limited version of a policy that he has yet to push through Congress.

The order, which Mr. Obama will highlight in his annual State of the Union address on Tuesday night, is meant to underscore an increasing willingness by the president to bypass Congress if lawmakers continue to resist his agenda, aides said. After a year in which most of his legislative priorities went nowhere, Mr. Obama is seeking ways to make progress without cooperation on Capitol Hill.

The Times unintentional includes what could happen

But the minimum wage order will also illustrate the limits of that approach. If Congress increased the federal minimum wage to $10.10 from $7.25 as Mr. Obama has sought, 21 million employees would eventually get a raise unless their jobs were eliminated, according to estimates by a liberal research organization. Mr. Obama’s order at most is likely to affect several hundred thousand workers.

Who will pay for this bump in pay? You the taxpayer. Federal contractors will simply pass on the costs to the Government. Some jobs will also be lost. We could see what’s called “Increased productivity”, meaning fewer workers making up the work, along with increased technological solutions. Think ATMs. We certainly won’t see all the negative effects for these companies that one sees for companies that do not survive at the teet of the federal government, but there is a question in terms of a president unilaterally requiring that anyone who does business with the federal government to pay a minimum of $10.10 an hour. Remember, there is that pesky Constitution to consider, which requires equal protection under the law. Many of these companies do business with the private sector, and will be at a disadvantage with competitors, those who do not deal with Los Federales.

This is simply a populist move based on patronizing the Democrat base, with no bearing on economics or reality. If Republicans were smart they’d point out that the last minimum wage hike was passed by Republicans, with most Dems voting against it. The last one was part of an Iraq spending  bill. That may not be fair, but, hey, life isn’t fair.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Autocrat-lite POTUS To Unilaterally Raise Minimum Wage For Federal Contractors »

Bummer: Too Cold For A Polar Bear Plunge

On the bright side, at least they weren’t doing it to highlight “climate change”

(NBC Washington) Apparently, it can be too cold even for people who, for some reason, enjoy running into icy water, over and over again.

The 18th annual Maryland State Police Polar Bear Plunge at Sandy Point State Park in Maryland was canceled Saturday morning due to bitter cold and winds that whipped drifts of snow and ice onto the shoreline.

Saturday’s plunge was expected to have as many as 7,000 participants. It also features so-called Super Plungers, who dip into the water repeatedly over 24 hours. All the Super Plungers had raised at least $10,000 for charity.

One set of Super Plungers hit the water at 10 a.m. Friday. About 500 law enforcement officers — including some from Prince George’s County — took a dip at noon to raise money for the Special Olympics.

But even those devoted souls said the conditions were challenging. There was ice in the water, which complicated the start of the plunge.

“There’s no running today, because there’s ice in the water and the ice will cut your legs,” one participant said.

It was just too darned cold to do it Saturday. Brutal winds and temperatures. Shame, because they were raising money for the Special Olympics. How is this possible in the era of “climate change”?

Read: Bummer: Too Cold For A Polar Bear Plunge »

Pirate's Cove