The Parameters Of Warming

Let’s go back to basics, shall we?

  1. I believe that the Earth has warmed since 1850: I know this as a scientific fact. The warming is about 1.4 Fahrenheit in that time frame
  2. CO2 has increased in that time. Some believe that the danger threshold was 350ppm. If so, then why did warming spikes occur prior to that metric? Why were multiple Holocene warm period periods warmer than the current one? What cause the end of the last glacial period (which, technically, is still occurring, since there are glaciers)? Could there not be a more natural explanation?
  3. I believe Man does play some small part in the warming, mostly from things other than CO2. Land use, UHI, agriculture, landfills, even ocean pollution and ozone depletion. Consider that it is a fact that much of the warming is occurring at night, or, I should say, we do not get the radiative cooling that should occur.
  4. Let’s skip all the other random thoughts, and go to the big one: the argument is not about warming, it is about causation. Period. I have had arguments, not discussion, argument, with folks on the Right who claim there has been no warming. They’re deluded. I don’t believe in Creationism, but I’m willing to listen to them (not believe them, mind you) because at least they are arguing from a religious POV. The scientific facts show warming.
  5. The argument is about what has caused the Modern Warm Period warming.
  6. And, finally, the Earth has warmed around 1.4F, but what has caused this to occur. This is the crux of the debate.

Oh, by the way, I’m arguing causation, not warming. Hope that clears it up.

Read: The Parameters Of Warming »

Good News: “Climate Change” Causes More And Less Antarctic Ice

Because “climate change” causes everything

(Daily Mail) Earlier this year, global warming was blamed for the ‘irreversible retreat’ of west Antarctic glaciers.

But now scientists claim that warming of the planet is in fact behind a paradoxical growth in South Pole sea ice.

The comments come as Antarctica’s sea ice set a record this week, reaching 815,448 square miles (1,312,000 square km) of ice above its normal range.

Scientists believe the shift is caused by water melting from beneath the Antarctic ice shelves and re-freezing back on the surface.

‘The primary reason for this is the nature of the circulation of the Southern Ocean — water heated in high southern latitudes is carried equatorward, to be replaced by colder waters upwelling from below, which inhibits ice loss,’ Mark Serreze, director of the National Snow and Ice Data Centre, told Harold Ambler at Talking About the Weather.

Did the word “cult” just cross your mind? As all Skepetics know, there is no way to win a debate with Warmists, as Warmists will always have an excuse.

However, as reported in a separate blog post by Mr Ambler, Nasa scientist Walt Meier said that growing Antarctic sea ice coverage is less significant a measure than declining Arctic sea ice coverage when assessing climate change.

But, of course. If the reverse was happening, we’d hear that the Arctic didn’t matter. Of course, none of this proves anthropogenic causation. Just a typical Holocene warm period.

Read: Good News: “Climate Change” Causes More And Less Antarctic Ice »

If All You See…

…is a wonderful bike creating non-carbon polluted air, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Black & Right, with a post wondering if women will save Democrats in 2014.

BTW, how in the heck is she going to peddle in those shoes? Sheesh!

Read: If All You See… »

BBC Staff No Longer Allowed To Give Equal Time To Skeptics

They can dress it all up and take it to dinner, but at the end of the day Warmists are scared to allow their cult to be challenged, because they pretty much lose every time they are forced to debate

(Telegraph) BBC journalists are being sent on courses to stop them inviting so many cranks onto programmes to air ‘marginal views’

The BBC Trust on Thursday published a progress report into the corporation’s science coverage which was criticised in 2012 for giving too much air-time to critics who oppose non-contentious issues.

The report found that there was still an ‘over-rigid application of editorial guidelines on impartiality’ which sought to give the ‘other side’ of the argument, even if that viewpoint was widely dismissed.

Some 200 staff have already attended seminars and workshops and more will be invited on courses in the coming months to stop them giving ‘undue attention to marginal opinion.’

Excellent. Re-education.

“The Trust wishes to emphasise the importance of attempting to establish where the weight of scientific agreement may be found and make that clear to audiences,” wrote the report authors.

“Science coverage does not simply lie in reflecting a wide range of views but depends on the varying degree of prominence such views should be given.”

Consensus is not science. By BBC standards, scientists like Galileo Galilei and Issac Newton would have been considered cranks and banned. Heck, a favorite of the Left, Charles Darwin, would be banned, for failing to be part of the consensus. This is the state of Progressivism in the media, banning those they do not agree with.

Of course, the hyper-progressives at Salon love this type of fascism.

Read: BBC Staff No Longer Allowed To Give Equal Time To Skeptics »

Are Feds Bringing Riot Squads To Block Illegal Alien Protesters?

If this Breitbart report is correct, this is a dangerous escalation of the federal government’s use of blatant power, which violates multiple 1st Amendment Rights

As illegal immigrants continue to spill across the U.S.-Mexico border, federal authorities are attempting to relocate the migrants from South Texas to housing facilities in states across the nation. One such facility is located in Murrieta, California, where a large group of protesters recently blocked a bus full of migrants from arriving. The protesters remain there, adamant that illegal immigrants don’t get dumped in their town. But soon the concerned citizens may be forced to step down–Breitbart Texas has learned that federal agents plan to arrive in Murrieta on Monday with riot gear to ensure that another busload makes it to the housing facility.

Jeremy Oliver, a resident of Temecula, California–a town that neighbors Murrieta–told Breitbart Texas that local police officers warned the protesters that “it’s going to get ugly.”

Oliver said, “The feds are pissed that they haven’t been able to use this facility. Officers out there warned people that federal agents will be in Murrieta on Monday–they are going to get the next bus through no matter what. Riot gear and shields will be used to push the crowd back.”

John Henry, a Murrieta resident since 1991, was told the same thing by local officers.

“We’re being told that federal Marshals or ICE will be here in the next few days and that they are bringing riot gear,” Henry said. “They’re apparently going to be blocking off the street with concrete blockades so that no vehicles can get through. The River County Sheriff’s Department showed up last night and brought a huge watch tower that shoots up into the air 35 feet.”

Henry also noted that when Americans break laws, they are immediately arrested. But illegals are being treated with kid gloves, and, rather than being immediately deported, they are being relocated. One US citizen was arrested at the protest for crossing the yellow tape line. Huh. Think about that.

The Lonely Conservative points out

Didn’t someone from the administration previously promise that they would not send these immigrants to communities where they aren’t wanted? So much for that promise. They’re sending them to cities without even consulting with city leadership. Numbers USA has an interactive map showing where they’re planning to ship the illegals and where they’ve already sent them.

Furthermore, DHS Head Jeh Johnson is unable to say whether the illegals will be deported or not. Fortunately, Los Federales may be about to deploy riot gear encased federal Stormtroopers to deal with those pesky American 1st Amendment users.

American Power has lots of pictures and information on the ground in Murrieta.

Everyone should be very concerned about the use of federal agents in this manner. Liberals used to be concerned about the Central Government flexing its muscles against the Citizenry.

Fortunately, Obama is heading to Texas, a border state which is one of those seeing a huge influx of the illegals. As usual, though, Obama isn’t going there to Do His Job. Oh, no. He’s headed to multiple fundraisers. This isn’t leading from behind. It’s an abdication of responsibility.

Read: Are Feds Bringing Riot Squads To Block Illegal Alien Protesters? »

Team Obama Already In Spin Mode Ahead Of Obamacare Rate Hikes

Politico refers to the coming rate hikes as a “September Surprise“. How is it a surprise when ever already knows that Obamacare rates are going to take a nice little spike?

Obamacare open enrollment closed March 31. The White House’s Obamacare war room did not.

Most state health insurance rates for 2015 are scheduled to be approved by early fall, and most are likely to rise, timing that couldn’t be worse for Democrats already on defense in the midterms.

The White House and its allies know they’ve been beaten in every previous round of Obamacare messaging, never more devastatingly than in 2010. And they know the results this November could hinge in large part on whether that happens again.

So they’re trying to avoid — or at least, get ahead of — any September surprise.

Aware that state insurance rate hikes could give Republicans a chance to resurrect Obamacare as a political liability just weeks before the midterms, the White House’s internal health care enrollment outreach apparatus immediately redirected into a rapid-response, blocking-and-tackling research and press operation geared toward preempting GOP attacks on the issue.

Premiums are expected to rise. Some in double digits, some not. Rather than rates going down, per the million and one times Obama and the Ocare supporters stated it would reduced family costs by $2500, they are going up. Rates are going up, despite it being called the “Affordable Care Act”. And what is Team Obama doing? Something to fix the rising costs? Nope. Spinning.

For months, the half-dozen White House communications and policy aides have been assembling state-by-state histories of health insurance rates before the Affordable Care Act was implemented, the drop-offs between initial rate proposals and final rates, and an analysis of the law’s effects and projections for 2015 — all condensed to fit on a two-page background and talking points document tailored for each state.

The law might be popular if costs were down. Of course, the costs would be worse if the deductibles weren’t so high. There’s no attempt to fix any of this, just an attempt to provide political spin.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Team Obama Already In Spin Mode Ahead Of Obamacare Rate Hikes »

Democrat Sugar Daddy Tom Steyer Is Massive Climahypocrite

But, then, aren’t most Warmists hypocrites? Some are just more hypocritical than others. What’s most shocking is that this article was published in the NY Times

To environmentalists across Australia, it is a baffling anachronism in an era of climate change: the construction of a 4,000-acre mine in New South Wales that will churn out carbon-laden coal for the next 30 years.

The mine’s groundbreaking, in a state forest this year, inspired a veteran to stand in front of a bulldozer and a music teacher to chain himself to a piece of excavation equipment.

But the project had an unlikely financial backer in the United States, whose infusion of cash helped set it in motion: Tom Steyer, the most influential environmentalist in American politics, who has vowed to spend $100 million this year to defeat candidates who oppose policies to combat climate change. (snip)

Over the past 15 years, Mr. Steyer’s fund, Farallon Capital Management, has pumped hundreds of millions of dollars into companies that operate coal mines and coal-fired power plants from Indonesia to China, records and interviews show. (snip)

Mr. Steyer sold his ownership stake in Farallon in late 2012, but he has not cut ties with it entirely. He remains a passive investor, his aides said, though they declined to describe the size of his investment. Employees at Farallon screen out any fossil-fuel-related holdings from his portfolio, and he no longer earns a share of the profits from the fund, the aides said.

He made his money, and now he can be free to pretend to care about “climate change”. All those coal projects will last for 15-30 years, minimum, and Steyer can pretend he’s all sorts of concerned about “climate change”, much like how Al Gore can be “concerned”, despite selling Current TV to fossil fuels backed Al Jazeera. All while looking to shutter plants here in America, causing our cost of living to skyrocket while making energy more unstable. Of course

In interviews, several prominent environmentalists argued that Mr. Steyer’s unrivaled spending to support climate-change policies outweighed the impact of the carbon pollution unleashed by his past investments.

“This is precisely what we want people to do: sell investments in fossil fuels and get to work solving the problem of climate change,” said Bill McKibben, a founder of the group 350.org, which pushes financial institutions to divest from fossil fuels.

Of course many Warmist groups (who use lots of fossil fuels themselves) will forgive him: he’s pumping lots of cash into their causes.

Read: Democrat Sugar Daddy Tom Steyer Is Massive Climahypocrite »

If All You See…

…are awesome carbon friendly bikes which Everyone Else should be forced to ride, you might just be a Warmist

It’s Bike Week, and the blog of the day is American Power, with a post on stalker trolls.

BTW, since I may not get to it, apparently riding bikes is now racist.

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup – 150th Edition!

Happy Sunday! Another gorgeous day in the awesome nation of America. This pinup is by Gil Elvgren, with a wee bit of help. Can you believe this is the 150th edition of this weekly post? 150 straight Sundays!

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Yid With Lid wonders about pot being a basic human right in The People’s Republic Of Berkley
  2. Wild Thing discusses what pro-illegals did to the American Flag on the 4th
  3. The People’s Cube features a really awkward jihadi moment
  4. The Other McCain delves into gender theory
  5. The Jawa Report notes what a judge told CAIR
  6. The Camp Of The Saints discusses American fascism
  7. White House Dossier covers Obama’s shameful politicization of the 4th
  8. Rio Norte Line wonders if sex is a right
  9. No Tricks Zone notes destruction of climate data
  10. Not A Lot Of People Know That covers strange data in Ohio
  11. Patterico wonders about “natural rights”
  12. Moonbattery has enraged moonbats on Hobby Lobby
  13. Legal Insurrection notes the number of new pages of Obamacare regulations released
  14. House Of Eratosthenes wonders about Progressives on the Founding Fathers
  15. And last, but not least, Fire Andrea Mitchell discusses the 300k diseased illegals

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup – 150th Edition! »

Whiny College Students Claim Discrimination Over NC Voter ID Law

The funniest part about all these voter ID lawsuits is that the groups suing could use all the money they’re spending to purchase legal state ID cards for everyone

(NY Times) Joining a challenge to a state law alongside the N.A.A.C.P., the American Civil Liberties Union and the Justice Department, lawyers for seven college students and three voter-registration advocates are making the novel constitutional argument that the law violates the 26th Amendment, which lowered the voting age to 18 from 21. The amendment also declares that the right to vote “shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of age.”

Hmm, there’s another Amendment which uses the word a similar word to abridged, “infringed“, but these same Leftist groups have no qualms about violating that. They also do not mind violating Free Speech with all sorts of “code of conduct” style restrictions at colleges. Nor free expression of religion.

“There’s an unprecedented effort nationally by Republican-controlled legislatures to restrict the franchise in a way we haven’t seen in a long time,” said Marc Elias, the Democratic election lawyer bringing the age-discrimination claim. “Young voting in particular is a part of that effort.”

What about all the Democrat states, such as Hawaii, that require ID? Voters are also required to sign a book verifying they cast a vote!!!!

Under the North Carolina law passed last year, the period for early voting was shortened and same-day registration was eliminated. Beginning in 2016, voters will need to show photo identification, and student ID cards, including those issued by state universities, will not be acceptable. In most instances, neither will an out-of-state driver’s license.

The law also eliminated a program in which teenagers filled out their voter-registration forms early and were automatically registered when they turned 18.

“For people like me, it makes what should be a simple process very difficult,” said Josue Berduo, 20, an economics major at North Carolina State University and a Democrat who is one of the plaintiffs.

Sniffle, poor little snowflakes, actually having to go and register when they turn 18. Such a burden! And obtaining a legally recognized ID card? Goodness, it would be so burdensome to have to pay *GASP* $10 for an ID, and, oh, yeah, have a document that proves they are a North Carolina resident. I’m pretty certain that most students have at least a state ID card or driver’s license, which are necessary to get into bars, even if one is not old enough to drink.

Mr. Berduo, who is from Asheville, N.C., has a state identification card. But many students do not, he said, and no matter how much attention the law gets, some students will be unaware of the changes and will arrive at polling places carrying out-of-state licenses or student identification cards.

Well, if they have an out of state ID, then are they North Carolina residents and eligible to vote in North Carolina elections? Should they not be voting in their own states? I was a New Jersey resident for most of my undergraduate time at ECU. I voted in NJ. Not NC. If students who are North Carolina residents want to vote, there is a simple solution: obtain a valid ID card. It’s super easy. But the point of all the suits is to make it easier for Democrats to cheat, in this case to make it easier for out of state students to vote in North Carolina and their home states.

And, in a big shocker, the students can go to the DMV and obtain a free, yes, free, Voter ID Card. All you have to do is prove a few things, including that you are a NC resident. Democrats want more and more and more rules, regulations, and laws that impact our lives on a daily basis, yet freak out over voter ID (in Red states, of course, not where required in Blue states).

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Whiny College Students Claim Discrimination Over NC Voter ID Law »

Pirate's Cove