…is a mountain missing it’s icecap due to global boiling, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is Powerline, with a post on when Minnesota was a normal place.
Read: If All You See… »
…is a mountain missing it’s icecap due to global boiling, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is Powerline, with a post on when Minnesota was a normal place.
Read: If All You See… »
Real, or, are they just glomming on to the trend?
Cryptocurrency group takes responsibility for green sex toys thrown at WNBA games
After more than a week of WNBA games being interrupted by neon green sex toys, a cryptocurrency group has claimed responsibility.
A spokesperson for the group behind a meme coin called Green Dildo Coin spoke to USA Today in an interview published Thursday, taking credit for what the group called “pranks” at six different WNBA games since July 29. The spokesperson remained anonymous for the interview, with USA Today citing “the sensitive nature of the issue.”
The latest incident arrived later in the day, with a pair of sex toys thrown at a game between the Chicago Sky and Atlanta Dream. One made it to the court.
Per USA Today, the supposedly “lighthearted” meme coin was launched on July 28 as a counter to what the group considers a “toxic environment” in the crypto world. The group coordinated plans to enter WNBA arenas with green sex toys to promote the launch, according to text messages obtained by USA Today. The first sex toy incident took place on July 29, the day after the launch.
Of course, regarding the two who were arrested for disorderly conduct and other charges, the company says “they weren’t ours!” Weasels.
And, really, “toxic environment” in the crypto world? WTF? That’s very silly. Throwing dildos at women, no matter what your opinion of the WNBA, is rude and obnoxious, something drunk college kids might do. But, their less drunk friends would probably stop them.
The spokesman said
“We didn’t do this because like we dislike women’s sports or, like, some of the narratives that are trending right now are ridiculous,” he said. “Creating disruption at games is like, it happens in every single sport, right? We’ve seen it in the NFL, we’ve seen it in hockey, you know, . . . fans doing random things to more or less create attention.
“We knew that in order to get a voice in the space … we had to go out and do some viral stunts to save us from having to pay that influencer cabal, sacrifice our souls and the fate of the project, more or less.”
It’s just crypto coins, bruh. Something most people do not understand.
“It’s super disrespectful,” Chicago Sky center Elizabeth Williams said after a sex toy was thrown at a home game on Friday.”It’s really immature. Whoever is doing it needs to grow up.”
“It’s ridiculous. It’s dumb. It’s stupid,” Los Angeles Sparks coach Lynne Roberts said on Tuesday after the object was thrown at a Sparks game.”It’s also dangerous, and you know, player safety is No. 1, respecting the game, all those things. I think it’s really stupid.”
I have to agree. It also means others will try their own hand at it.
Read: Green Dildo Coin Crypto Company Claims Responsibility For Dildos At WNBA Games »
Certainly some of those rich Warmists could pony up to do it, right?
Trump moves to end NASA missions measuring carbon dioxide and plant health
The Trump administration is moving to shut down two NASA missions that monitor a potent greenhouse gas and plant health, potentially shutting off an important source of data for scientists, policymakers and farmers.
President Donald Trump’s budget request for fiscal year 2026 includes no money for the Orbiting Carbon Observatories, which can precisely show where carbon dioxide is being emitted and absorbed and how well crops are growing.
NASA said in an emailed statement Wednesday that the missions were “beyond their prime mission” and being terminated “to align with the President’s agenda and budget priorities.”
But the missions — a free-flying satellite launched in 2014 and an instrument attached to the International Space Station in 2019 that include technology used in the Hubble Space Telescope — still are more sensitive and accurate than any other systems in the world, operating or planned, and a “national asset” that should be saved, said David Crisp, a retired NASA scientist who led their development.
You know who knows how the crops are growing? Farmers. The Warmists have used the data to fearmonger for their cult, claiming that crops are doing bad per the satellite in contradiction of real world data.
Read: Bummer: Trump Admin Looks To End NASA Monitoring Of CO2 »
Well, certainly all the folks in Chicago would be willing to see their taxes raised, right?
Mayor Brandon Johnson says Chicago finances have reached “point of no return”
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson sounded the alarm Tuesday about Chicago’s finances.
“We have reached a point of no return,” Mayor Johnson said Tuesday. “The systems that people rely upon — education, health care, housing, our transportation — they are woefully underfunded, and everyone knows that. Everyone knows what, you know, my commitment is to progressive revenue. I can’t do this by myself.”
The mayor’s statement came in response to a question about a pension bill signed into law by Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker last week.
The law will increase retirement benefits for police and firefighters, adding more than $11 billion to Chicago’s long-term pension liability.
Johnson said the state needs new progressive revenue options, but he did not name any specific plans.
Taxes. That would be taxes. And fees.
The city of Chicago has a massive $1.1 billion budget gap to fill for 2026. Mayor Johnson promising has promised not to once again pitch a property tax hike — which the City Council unanimously rejected for 2025 — but said last week he’s looking at creative ways to raise tax dollars.
Obviously, this would be the ultra-rich, who will just leave the city, as they have the means, and take their money and businesses with them. But, hey, maybe if the city hadn’t spent more than $400 million since 2022 on illegals they’d be in a better financial position.
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Announces Plans To Expand $10M Sustainable Community School Program
…
“We said the only way we’re going to truly transform our public school system in Chicago is by serving the entire child. We are never going to make any real progress until we reckon with the fact that the struggles of our students primarily result from the fact that 72% of students are from low income families,” Johnson said during the press conference. “The overwhelming majority of our students are Black and brown, and they come from poor and working class communities. Until we start to bring the community into our schools, in fact, until our schools become community hubs in every single neighborhood, we will not see real transformation. But that’s what we are so excited about today.”
Where’s the money coming from for the schools that consistently underperform? $1.1 billion in the hole.
Read: Surprise: Mayor Johnson Of SCC Says Cities Finances Are Horrible »
Well, if they were taking public money then they’re at the whim of whomever runs the government
Dozens of Wind and Solar Projects Stall as Trump Cracks Down on Renewables
The Trump administration has sharply escalated its attacks on wind and solar power in recent days, issuing a barrage of policies that could halt the construction of renewable energy projects on public and private lands across the country.
The Interior Department is now requiring dozens of formerly routine consultations and approvals for wind and solar projects to undergo new layers of political review by the interior secretary’s office, a policy that is causing significant permitting delays. The agency is also opening investigations into bird deaths caused by wind farms and withdrawing millions of acres of federal waters previously available for leasing by offshore wind companies.
The Interior Department also signaled that it would review wind projects that have already been approved by the federal government but are being sued by opponents, and consider rescinding their permits, a step that could halt projects already under construction.
On Wednesday, the agency said it was reversing a Biden administration decision to approve the Lava Ridge Wind Project, a giant wind farm planned for southern Idaho that was opposed by state lawmakers because, among other things, it would be visible from the Minidoka National Historic Site, a World War II internment camp for Japanese Americans. The Trump administration said it had discovered “legal deficiencies” in the original approval but did not provide details.
Man, it’s a real shame when the tactics Democrats use to stop things they do not like are used against them, eh?
Dozens of wind and solar projects that sit on both public and private lands nationwide are now stalled while waiting for what were once ordinary approvals from the federal government, Mr. Grumet said. While fewer than 5 percent of solar and wind projects are on public lands directly overseen by the Interior Department, many projects on private lands often need federal approvals to comply with wildlife protections or other laws.
One planned solar facility on private land in the Upper Midwest is currently delayed because federal agencies have halted all discussions over a needed water permit. Another large solar farm on private land in the West is being held up because it must now undergo three layers of political review, including by Mr. Burgum’s office.
Hmm, that whole “well, it’s your land, but, Los Federales will dictate what you can do on it” sure has come full circle, eh?
Elizabeth Peace, a spokeswoman for the Interior Department, declined to comment on the delays but defended the agency’s stricter reviews. “Evaluating land use efficiency and environmental impact isn’t partisan, it’s responsible governance,” she said.
That’s going to leave a mark.
Read: Bummer: Trump Admin Stalling Wind And Solar Through New Permitting Requirements »
…is horrible carbon pollution infused beer, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is The Gateway Pundit, with a post on the FBI firing a whole bunch of people involved in investigating Trump and J6ers.
Read: If All You See… »
Realistically, in most cases, why are there unions for federal agencies? The whole point of a union was to protect workers from harsh, unsafe working conditions, from bad bosses, and to negotiate for better wages and benefits. Well, in most cases, federal workers do not have harsh, unsafe working conditions (except for Gen Z, who thinks a 40 hour work-week an having to come into the office is mean). Democrats tell us that Government Is Good, so, why would they have bad bosses, especially when most are also liberals? And federal workers have much higher wages and benefits than most private workers. But, that is what the unions are really doing: negotiating with Dems to get more and more at the expense of the federal taxpayer, then donating back to Dems
Trump Administration Begins to Strip Federal Workers of Union Protections
The Trump administration has moved forward with a plan to end collective bargaining with federal unions across a swath of government agencies, even after arguing in federal court that it would not do so until a legal battle over an order President Trump signed was over.
The Department of Veterans Affairs said on Wednesday that it had moved to strip labor protections for more than 400,000 of its workers — most of whom are represented by the American Federation of Government Employees, the largest union for federal employees.
The department’s announcement included attacks on union activities and leadership, and Doug Collins, the head of the agency, argued in a statement that the “unions that represent V.A. employees fight against the best interests of veterans while protecting and rewarding bad workers.”
Everett Kelley, the president of the A.F.G.E., said in a statement that the V.A.’s decision was “another clear example of retaliation” against unions that have opposed Mr. Trump’s plans to slash the federal bureaucracy. Mr. Kelley accused Mr. Collins of choosing to “rip up the negotiated union contract” of the majority of his work force.
Well, not really: Republicans have long wanted to end most federal unions, or, at least, strip most of their power. Government unions should not be negotiating with friendly government to get more and more while doing less and less.
With few exceptions, union employees at the Department of Veterans Affairs have now lost the rights and protections provided by a 308-page collective bargaining agreement between the agency and the federal employees union. Those include the right to have work disputes resolved by a neutral arbitrator, and to have union stewards and leaders be granted official time on the job to work on cases and participate in contract negotiations.
How many work disputes are there? Upset because they were written up for coming in late a lot? Weren’t allowed to take a “mental health day” because they were triggered by seeing a Trump hat?
(Thomas Jefferson Institute) Private-sector unions fight with management over an equitable distribution of profits. Government unions negotiate with friendly politicians over taxpayer’s money putting the public interest at odds with union interests, just as we have seen in states such as California and Wisconsin, exploding the cost of government until we are at the breaking point today. California’s public sector pension costs soared 2000 percent in the last decade thanks to unions.
Huh. How about this from 2011
(NY Times) The founders of the labor movement viewed unions as a vehicle to get workers more of the profits they help create. Government workers, however, don’t generate profits. They merely negotiate for more tax money. When government unions strike, they strike against taxpayers. F.D.R. considered this “unthinkable and intolerable.”
Government collective bargaining means voters do not have the final say on public policy. Instead their elected representatives must negotiate spending and policy decisions with unions. That is not exactly democratic – a fact that unions once recognized.
Interesting.
(City Journal) Even if the Trump administration prevails against the unions in court, however, its victories could be undone by a future White House. The most effective way permanently to curb public union power in Washington—and restore accountability in the bureaucracy—is for Congress to repeal federal employees’ collective-bargaining rights. (snip)
To that end, Trump should push the GOP-controlled House and Senate to pass legislation banning federal workers from collectively bargaining. He and other leaders should frame that policy as a way to save taxpayers’ money. As the Institute for the American Worker has shown, the collective-bargaining process costs taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars yearly.
Not sure if they can get that through the barely controlled Senate. They could maybe leave working conditions clauses in, especially when it comes to protecting law enforcement, but, collective-bargaining needs to end.
Read: Trump Admin Looks To Terminate Union Protections For Federal Workers »
Sadly, the judge didn’t say to the city in the lawsuit “You don’t like fossil fuels? Don’t use them”
Charleston’s Climate Lawsuit Against Oil Giants Is Dismissed
A judge in Charleston, S.C., dismissed on Wednesday the city’s lawsuit against oil and gas companies over their role in climate change, ruling that the case raised questions that were far beyond the bounds of state laws.
During two days of hearings in May, lawyers for the city argued that the companies, ranging from giants like Exxon Mobil and Chevron to local firms, had covered up what they knew about the dangers of greenhouse gas emissions. They accused the companies of mounting a disinformation campaign to cast doubt on climate science and failing to warn the public about the dangers ahead.
Those actions increased demand for fossil fuels, which led to emissions and the grave risks linked to climate change that the historic coastal city now faces, including flooding and sea-level rise, they argued. The case cited state tort laws and the state’s Unfair Trade Practices Act and sought funds for adaptation and mitigation projects.
In his 45-page decision, Judge Roger M. Young wrote that while the lawyers argued the claims were about deception, “they are premised on, and seek redress for, the effects of greenhouse gas emissions.” He said that those issues fall squarely under federal and not state law, and that the court lacked jurisdiction over out-of-state companies.
We’re increasingly seeing this as the response of the judges. But, really, Charleston wouldn’t run without fossil fuels. City services, including the FF vehicles for the mayor and other city officials. All the cruise ships. The airports. All the boats and ships. All the people driving to Charleston in FF vehicles. All the residents. Maybe Charleston should try banning them, see how that works out.
Read: Bummer: Climate (scam) Lawsuit From City Of Charleston Against Big Oil Dismissed »
Category 5 Moonbattery incoming
‘Speedway Slammer’ immigration jail set to be Trump’s next ‘Alligator Alcatraz’
The motorsports company behind the Indy 500 says it was caught off-guard by the Trump administration branding a new immigration detention center as the “Speedway Slammer.”
Following an Aug. 5 announcement that Indiana house up to 1,000 detained immigrants at a maximum-security prison, Homeland Security touted the agreement online with a mash-up photo that features an IndyCar with an imposing detention center in the background.
The Republican-led state volunteered to host the Trump administration’s next immigration detention center after Florida created a detention facility dubbed “Alligator Alcatraz.”
DHS Secretary Kristi Noem has been touting the administration’s efforts to rapidly expand immigration detention capacity amid a surge in immigrant arrests.
“If you are in America illegally, you could find yourself in Indiana’s Speedway Slammer,” Noem said in an Aug. 5 post on X. “Avoid arrest and self deport now using the CBP Home App.”
Well, at least the weather is nicer than Florida, and no alligators. Pythons. Scary spiders. But, it is in Indiana. And they can all avoid this by getting the hell out of the U.S.
Immigrant advocates say the nicknames obscure the harrowing conditions that have been documented in ICE detention in recent months and dehumanize the people held there.
No one cares. If they leave they have no worries. BTW, no one really listens when other criminals are sent to jail.
Meanwhile
L.A. officials, Penske trucks decry federal agents’ use of vehicle in immigration raid
An immigration raid at a Westlake Home Depot has raised the temperature on simmering tensions in Los Angeles.
Video posted to social media shows what appears to be a squad of federal agents loading into a Penske truck, with the video’s caption saying the scene was recorded at 6:40 a.m
Obviously, all sorts of lefties are having conniption fits, even threatening to no longer rent from Penske, not that Penske had anything to do with this, and whined that their trucks shouldn’t be used to transport people.
Read: Indiana To Build “Speedway Slammer” Immigration Detention Center »
Remember back when we were told we should only listen to climate scientists? About taht
Law professor says Oregon can take action if federal climate change regulations go up in smoke
With the Trump administration’s dismantling of environmental regulations and total reversal of policies to combat climate change, activists have filed lawsuits and requests for injunctions all over the country. The latest development is the Trump-led Environmental Protection Agency reversing the long-standing “endangerment finding” that greenhouse gases threatened human health and welfare. One environmental law professor at Harvard called it “an assault on the foundation of all federal climate policy.”
Well, yeah, it is, because the Constitution really didn’t give the Congress the power to do this, hence, the Executive Branch wouldn’t have laws to Do Something. But, it is what it is, hence, what Obama and Biden can put into regulation Trump can kill
Lewis & Clark environmental law professor Melissa Powers says Oregon — and other states — do have options to fight climate change, besides filing individual lawsuits. She says one viable strategy would be for Oregon to create a Climate Superfund. We talk with her about what the unraveling of environmental regulations is likely to mean in Oregon and more about the potential for an Oregon Climate Superfund.
Hmm, notice she fails to say that the Warmists in Oregon can practice what they preach? Give up their own use of fossil fuels, live in tiny homes, don’t use hair dryers and ice makers, only buy second hand clothes, not use plastics, and more? Weird, right?
Read: Law Professor Says Oregon Can Take Steps As Trump Kills Federal Climate (scam) Action »