ZOMG, Trump’s Saturday Night Massacre Is Totally Happening Before Our Eyes!

I ran across a post at Sad And Useless yesterday about Modern Journalism. Go ahead and click the link first…..OK, now you have an idea of the over-the-top, unhinged, make everything beyond rationality journalism of today. Moving forward, we get this bit of insanity by Norman Eisen, Caroline Fredrickson, and Noah Bookbinder at Politico

Trump’s Saturday Night Massacre Is Happening Right Before Our Eyes

The FBI issued an extraordinary statement on Wednesday, pushing back on the release of a partisan congressional memo alleging the bureau used improper evidence to obtain legal permission to surveil a Trump campaign adviser. We’ve never seen anything like it. “[T]he FBI was provided a limited opportunity to review this memo the day before the committee voted to release it,” the bureau said. “As expressed during our initial review, we have grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.”

As John Hinderaker explains, he has grave concerns, too. Concerns that the FBI and DOJ acted beyond improperly in the runup to the 2016 elections, and have become beyond politicized.

The memo, written by Congressman Devin Nunes and barreling toward public circulation at the president’s discretion, has already created a firestorm, and it is not even out yet. Nunes fired back at the FBI hours later, claiming, “It’s clear that top officials used unverified information in a court document to fuel a counterintelligence investigation during an American political campaign.”

Let’s be clear about what’s happening here: This memo is the latest escalation in an eight-month effort to tarnish the Russia investigation that might be the most significant smear campaign against the executive branch since Joe McCarthy—only here, the effort is being led by the head of that branch himself. As the New York Times reported, the Nunes memo seems like a dagger aimed by President Trump at Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who is supervising the Russia probe for the Justice Department.

Interestingly, that 8 month effort has brought forth nothing that shows collusion, and no wrong-doing in line with the whole idea of the investigation. There have been a few process issues, and Mueller and his team have gone way off track in looking at things that have nothing to do with Russian interference. After all this time, one would think there would be something. Something that says “hey, there was collusion!” Which, while despicable, would not be illegal.

Unlike the investigation into Watergate, which is where the Saturday Night Massacre comes from, when “Nixon fired fired Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox and accepted the resignations of Attorney General Elliot Richardson and Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus.”

Hinderaker wrote

I’m so old, I can remember when liberals were in favor of revealing corruption in institutions like the FBI. Those days, of course, are long gone.

Yes, they are. They know there are serious problems in the FBI and DOJ. The Nunes memo will expose some of that corruption and politicization. And it could be the start of exposing Obama and his cronies. Which is why you get turn the volume to 11 articles like the Politico one.

Read: ZOMG, Trump’s Saturday Night Massacre Is Totally Happening Before Our Eyes! »

Washington Post: Trump Poisoned The Debate On Legalizing 11 Million Illegals Or Something

The Washington Post Editorial is rather vexed at Trump’s position on illegal immigration, and, much like Jorge Ramos, lets the cat out of the bag

Trump could’ve embraced an immigration deal. Instead, he poisoned the debate.

IN HIS State of the Union address, President Trump seemed intent on burying any chance of enacting legislation to protect the “dreamers.” Instead of reaching out to Democrats to fashion a readily achievable compromise, the president injected more ethno-nationalist venom into a debate he already has done much to poison.

Eleven million immigrants are living in this country without legal documentation, but the vast majority of them are otherwise law-abiding. In fact, they are overwhelmingly employed, long-term residents who contribute to their communities in all manner of ways……

If they’re employed, they aren’t doing it legally. One needs a social security number or a work permit to do that: illegal aliens aren’t eligible for those. Plus other documents for an I9, which would knock them out. So, they’re either using someone else’s identity, or they’re working off the books. Either way, they’re taking jobs from Americans. And could be ruining the credit and identities of legal U.S. citizens.

…That is especially true of the dreamers, young people brought to this country as children by their parents. Very few Americans want to see the dreamers rounded up and deported, so you’d think a president would search for common ground to prepare the way for their eventual path to citizenship.

He did. He laid out a path for way more than the 800K Dreamers we typically hear about, to the consternation of his base. And, it included a path to citizenship, no just legalization. But, it is interesting that the WPEB is now discussing all 11 million illegals getting legal status, is it not?

Instead, Mr. Trump chose in the most inflammatory way possible to associate immigrants with a horrific crime committed by a vicious gang. Rather than reminding Americans of their common roots as immigrants and stressing that immigration is the cornerstone of the American story, Mr. Trump vilified them. He would have Americans believe that compassionate treatment for unaccompanied minors who cross the border, often fleeing violence and poverty, or family-based immigration is somehow akin to acquiescing in the homicidal nihilism of MS-13.

Much like many Democrats, the WPEB heard what they wanted to hear, and it’s also interesting that they chose to hear that violent illegal aliens are the same as all illegal aliens. That’s pretty racist/bigoted/prejudicial, is it not? Regardless, for most of us, our forebearers came to this country in a lawful manner, rather than sneaking across the border or overstaying visas, then Demanding citizenship for free.

Mr. Trump could have sought a constructive way forward. He could have urged Congress to forge a straightforward deal — a shield for the dreamers in return for border security. Some Democrats would be reluctant to give the president his “beautiful wall”; some Republicans would balk at “amnesty” for dreamers. But if Mr. Trump embraced the deal, so would Congress.

Instead, he attempted to expropriate the grief of four of his guests in the gallery: parents still mourning the brutal 2016 murder of their teenage daughters on Long Island. That won’t earn him the moral high ground, but it may well deepen the nation’s divisions and further complicate the fate of nearly 2 million young immigrants about whom Mr. Trump has said, “I love these kids.”

It’s interesting that the WPEB is simply blowing off the concerns of these people who had their teenage daughters brutally murdered by illegal aliens. During the gun debate, they’re often the ones saying “if we could save just one life…”

Maybe the saddest moment of the speech came when Mr. Trump tried to knock the dreamers off their sympathetic perch with the cleverly contemptuous line, “Americans are dreamers, too.” Yes, of course, Americans are dreamers. But he should finish the thought. For most dreamers, the United States is the only country they know. Dreamers are U.S. soldiers, high school valedictorians, the young couple living next door. Yes, Americans are dreamers — and dreamers are Americans. If only we had a president who understood as much.

Then perhaps the “Dreamers” should have come here legally. Perhaps they could have applied for legal status the lawful way. Not demanding that America give them food, healthcare, education, money, jobs, a place to live, and citizenship.

If the WPEB wants to poison the well, by all means keep this assault up on Trump, which will cause him to say “eh, never mind. Moving on. Could have been a beautiful bill, beautiful.” And interjecting 11 million illegals into the debate will cause a backlash from Republicans, much less Trump’s base, and the whole thing will be scuttled.

Read: Washington Post: Trump Poisoned The Debate On Legalizing 11 Million Illegals Or Something »

Say, What’s The Dreamer Fight Really About?

And that’s pretty much it in a nutshell. This is why they want a “clean” DACA bill, whereby all the Dreamers are given legalized status up to free citizenship with no border or interior security measures. That way the open borders continue, and then they want more amnesty.

And, again, why would we give any legalized status to the parents who brought the kids illegally? If they were the ones who “sinned”, and we shouldn’t punish the kids, then we need to punish the parents.

So, maybe it’s time to just move on from all this silliness, and just enforce federal law, and start deporting all of them. Democrats do not want to work in good faith. The Dreamers are demanding. Deport them all.

(Via Twitchy)

Read: Say, What’s The Dreamer Fight Really About? »

Whelp, This Is Gonna Leave A Mark

That’ll make Nancy Pelosi’s frown so deep she’ll no longer have wrinkles.

Read: Whelp, This Is Gonna Leave A Mark »

If All You See…

…is a world flooded from carbon pollution because Other People ate a burger, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Evil Blogger Lady, with a post on Americans being dreamers, too.

Read: If All You See… »

Bummer: Climate Change Pretty Much Ignored During SOTU

This has made many members of the Cult of Climastrology Very Upset. Many are freaking out on Twitter and other social media, as one would expect. Then there are the articles, like this rant by Robinson Meyer at The Atlantic

Trump Doesn’t Mention Climate Change in His State of the Union

President Donald Trump didn’t mention climate change or global warming in his State of the Union address on Tuesday night.

(lots of whining)

Indeed, the president came about as close as possible to mentioning climate change—without saying the magic words. “We have endured floods, and fires, and storms,” he said early in his speech. “We saw the volunteers of the Cajun Navy racing with their fishing boats to save people from the aftermath of a totally devastating hurricane.” Later, he praised Americans’ ability to “push the bounds of science and discovery.”

Those passages would have been sharper, more accurate, and more befitting the scale of the problem if the president recognized the single issue uniting them. But saying the name of that problem is now verboten—a sacrifice to a particularly Republican form of political correctness. And so the country winds into another year, with a federal government that can utter the name of any number of threats to Americans—except the one that is already inundating its shores, scorching its homes, and shaping the lives of its children.

We used to call this “weather” and “nature” before some people decided to use it to blame Mankind and attempt to institute taxes, fees, and Big Government policies that control the lives of citizens.

But, hey, it wasn’t just Trump who ignored Hotcoldwetdry

(HuffPost) The Democratic Party omitted any mention of climate change in its rebuttal Tuesday to President Donald Trump’s first State of the Union address.

In his speech, Rep. Joe Kennedy (D-Mass.) didn’t bring up global warming, sea-level rise or the surge in global greenhouse gas emissions, which threaten to become worse as the Republican White House ramps up fossil fuel production to unprecedented levels.

People paid more attention to his Chapstick.

Even the State of the Union statement issued by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), considered one of the most hawkish Democrats on climate issues, snubbed climate change. He did, however, rail against the Trump administration’s plans to open nearly all federal waters to oil and gas exploration, nothing that the proposal put “the local commercial fishing industry and the Ocean State’s coastal economy in harm’s way.”

However, Comrade Bernie, who had an official position on his presidential campaign website to “bring climate deniers to justice”, a rather ominous call to infringe on the rights of citizens for Wrongthink, did mention it

“How can a president of the United States give a State of the Union speech and not mention climate change?” he said in his own rebuttal. “No, Mr. Trump, climate change is not a ‘hoax.’

Says the guy with three homes who takes lots of fossil fueled trips. Anyhow, there could be a good reason why most ignored the “issue”

Read: Bummer: Climate Change Pretty Much Ignored During SOTU »

‘Climate Change’ Might Possibly Maybe Force Tabasco To Find A New Home Or Something

Not Tabasco! Oh, noes, this is horrible! One of the premiere hot sauces out there! Terrible!

Climate Change Might Force Tabasco to Find a New Home

The nation’s oldest hot-sauce maker may soon be headed to drier ground. For 150 years, Louisiana’s McIlhenny family has manufactured its beloved Tabasco sauce on a geological salt dome called Avery Island that’s just a few miles inland from the Gulf of Mexico. Despite its name, it’s not a true “island,” though the area is surrounded by water, in the form of bayous and swampland, and has served the McIlhennys just fine since their hot sauce business began back in 1868.

Problem is, climate change is making the McIlhennys’ home more precarious by the day: The New Orleans Times-Picayune reports it was once “an ideal spot” for manufacturing, with convenient access to the coast, while 163 feet above sea level and on some 2,200 acres, which protected the site from bad Gulf storms. However, thanks to rising water levels, Avery is now “disappearing at a rapid pace.”

The Darwinist Warmists sure hate that nature changes, eh?

As described by the paper, the situation sounds quite dire:

The marsh protecting the island is losing about 30 feet per year. Saltwater is seeping into the marshes, killing freshwater plants and causing soil to loosen and dissolve. Nearby ship canals grow busier and wider, hastening erosion. Storms are more frequent and hit with more force.

The land is sinking as well. Subsidence drops the Louisiana coast by nearly an inch per year.

Building in a marsh area probably isn’t the greatest place, because conditions change. They aren’t stagnant. And this has nothing to do with man-caused climate change. Climate changes. Things change. That’s the nature of the planet.

What the article forgets to mention in it’s scaremongering is available at the NOLA link in the first paragraph

Demand for Tabasco outpaced the island’s capacity to grow peppers years ago. Seeds are raised there, but now about 99 percent of the peppers are cultivated in Latin America and South Africa. Once shipped to Avery, the peppers undergo a process identical to the one established by Edmund in 1868. The peppers are ground into a salted mash and then stored in reused bourbon barrels for three years. The mash is hauled to the blending facility, where it’s mixed with Tabasco’s third and last ingredient, vinegar.

So, no problems getting Tabasco no or in the future. Just scaremongering Warmists trying to scaremonger.

Read: ‘Climate Change’ Might Possibly Maybe Force Tabasco To Find A New Home Or Something »

Leave It To The NY TImes To Go Barking Moonbat On Trump’s SOTU

I did not see the State of the Union address, as I got home very late from working with a client. I do see that he called for bipartisanship

President Trump appealed for unity in his first State of the Union speech, declaring a “new American moment” even as many glum Democrats in the audience sat on their hands and refused to acknowledge economic gains or calls to honor veterans.

While Trump held firm on his demands for border security and used the grand setting to tout his first-year accomplishments, his call for bipartisanship on the thorny immigration debate met with stonefaced stares from top Democrats such as House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.

Democrats mostly sat on their hands, refusing to stand for the man who escaped from North Korea, a boy who planted flags on veteran’s graves, for the National Anthem, economic successes for Blacks and Latinos, or anything else. There were even some boos. Remember when Democrats and their pet media castigated Joe Wilson for yelling “you lie”? (and he was correct). Anyhow, here’s the unhinged NY Times Editorial Board take, for which they softened the web version of the sub head from “the reaction against his authoritarian impulses, assault on truth and cruelties great and petty has revealed abiding American strengths” to “The reaction against his presidency has revealed abiding American strengths.”

What the President Doesn’t Get About the State of the Union

There’s a level at which — when you consider that the president of the United States has cozied up to a foreign power that tampered with an American election, has repeatedly assaulted the country’s courts and its law enforcement and intelligence agencies, has defended neo-Nazis, has cried “fake news” while provably lying, and has been revealed so credibly to have paid off a porn star that it made news when his own wife chose to attend his biggest speech of the year — it’s hard to believe that the state of the union is strong.

Remember when Obama was caught on hot mike telling Russia’s President Dmitry Medvedev to tell Putin that he’d have more flexibility after the election? Remember when Obama blasted the Supreme Court during a SOTU when they were sitting in front of him? When he said the police “acted stupidly?” Perhaps the Times’ board members missed that Stormy Daniels denied the affair. Let’s continue the fun

Yet Mr. Trump was correct to take note of the continued strength of the American economic recovery. He was right to note that the unemployment rate has continued to drop, and that some big employers have been raising wages. That’s all good. It means that Mr. Trump has done nothing so far to derail the slow, steady recovery that began under Barack Obama nine years ago. If growth continues or accelerates under this president, he will eventually, like Mr. Obama and the Federal Reserve, deserve a lot of credit.

You have to know that if the economy was down, they’d be blaming Trump, not Obama. Since Trump took office, the economy has started roaring, where it was just meandering on during Obama’s years, the worst post-recession recovery since the Great Depression. The Times is so #resist that they can’t even give Trump a bit of credit.

Mr. Trump deserved to take a bow for the degradation of the Islamic State — again, a result of wise continuity with the policy of the previous administration — and for tightening sanctions on North Korea. That’s progress, much as we might wish he’d refrain from bragging about the size of his nuclear button.

That’s about as much of throwing a bone as they can offer, a backhanded compliment.

Mr. Trump can’t be blamed for all the country’s woes. Yet after a year in office, he can now fairly be held accountable, together with the feckless and cynical congressional leadership, for making many of them worse.

Interesting. During Obama’s first term, all bad things were the fault of George Bush. They then go on a five paragraph rant about everything they hate about Trump, too much too excerpt. It’s the kind of unhinged one would witness more at Salon or MSNBC, particularly Excitable Joe Scarborough or Mika, than one would expect from the editorial board of one of the world’s leading newspapers.

How, then, can we say with Donald Trump as president that the state of the union is strong? Here, Mr. Trump deserves much of the credit: So far, the reaction against his authoritarian impulses, assault on truth and cruelties great and petty has revealed abiding American strengths. Despite the strong economy, Americans overwhelmingly disapprove of this presidency. Most Americans say immigrants strengthen the country, according to the Pew Research Center. A profound national reckoning is underway over the status and treatment of women. Voters have streamed to the polls in off-year elections, defying suppression efforts even in Alabama to register their revulsion at Trumpian politics.

What, exactly, does that national reckoning have to do with Trump? The majority of those caught up in sexual harassment and worse have been Democratic Party voters in industries that tend to lean Democrat.

If not exactly “woke,” this country might certainly be described as awakening, with a shot at shedding the civic apathy that has afflicted it for far too long. It is with backhanded gratitude that we might all thank President Trump for that.

Read: Leave It To The NY TImes To Go Barking Moonbat On Trump’s SOTU »

Portland Warmists Look To Push A Sort-Of Carbon Tax On Other People

Isn’t interesting how members of the Cult of Climastrology always want to create a tax for Other People? That they always seem to exclude themselves…well, directly, of course, because these same taxes will end up hitting everyone negatively

(KOIN6)  A coalition led by environmental groups filed an initiative petition with the city of Portland on Jan. 18 to enact a sales tax on large retailers to fund projects that will decrease carbon emissions.

They call their measure the Portland Climate Action Community Benefits Initiative 2018 and are shooting for the November city ballot. The chief petitioner is Adriana Voss-Andreae, chairwoman of 350PDX, an affiliate of an international group working to avert dramatic climate change.

The measure aims to enact a new sales tax of 1 percent on retailers with more than $1 billion in gross revenues and more than $500,000 in Portland revenues. Retailers selling basic groceries, medicines and health care services are exempted.

Right there, it would see a lawsuit because it unfairly taxes certain businesses over others, but, regardless, it would drive those businesses out of Portland proper. For those who can’t, they’ll simply pass that 1% on to customers.

Of course, they’re going to play the redistribution game with Other People’s money

Money collected would be deposited into a Portland Climate Action Community Benefit Fund, which would be disbursed for renewable energy and energy efficiency projects, with a particular focus on projects that benefit low-income people and communities of color.

Portland is totally diverse, you know. Just 6.6% of the population is Black. 6.8 is Hispanic/Latino. Do these Leftist Warmists think that all Blacks and Latinos are poor? Pretty racist attitude, wouldn’t you say?

Read: Portland Warmists Look To Push A Sort-Of Carbon Tax On Other People »

If All You See…

…is a world turning to desert from Other People using ice makers, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Newsbusters, with a post on the perverted show “The Alienist.”

Read: If All You See… »

Pirate's Cove