For Paris Climate Agreement, Countries Made Promises They Aren’t Keeping

By William Teach February 21, 2018 – 3:26 pm

I know everyone is very, very shocked. We saw the same thing for the Kyoto Protocol, where few countries were even close to their goals. This has made the Warmists at the Washington Post very sad that this super historic agreement is a sham

Countries made only modest climate-change promises in Paris. They’re falling short anyway.

Barely two years ago, after weeks of intense bargaining in Paris, leaders from 195 countries announced a global agreement that once had seemed impossible. For the first time, the nations of the world would band together to reduce humanity’s reliance on fossil fuels in an effort to hold off the most devastating effects of climate change.

“History will remember this day,” the secretary general of the United Nations, Ban Ki-moon, said amid a backdrop of diplomats cheering and hugging.

Two years later, the euphoria of Paris is colliding with the reality of the present.

Global emissions of carbon dioxide are rising again after several years of remaining flat. The United States, under President Trump, is planning to withdraw from the Paris accord and is expected to see emissions increase by 1.8 percent this year, after a three-year string of declines. Other countries, too, are showing signs they might fail to live up to the pledges they made in Paris.

In short, the world is off target.

Really, like most Warmist articles in the news, they aren’t written as journalism, but as blog posts one might find at Think Progress or The Daily Kos.

Read: For Paris Climate Agreement, Countries Made Promises They Aren’t Keeping »

Posted in Collapsing Science, Global Warming | 5 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach February 21, 2018 – 1:00 pm

…are trees that will soon die from too much water or sunlight from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Political Clown Parade, with a post on Pelosi’s border security solution.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

Doom Today: Seas Will Totally Rise For 300 Years Because You Had A Burger

By William Teach February 21, 2018 – 10:23 am

Or maybe it’s Michael “Robust Debate” Mann’s fault

Here’s what Mann has caused

Seas Will Rise for 300 Years
And the longer it takes to reduce carbon emissions, the higher they will go

It’s a given of climate change that greenhouse gases emitted today will shape the world for future generations. But new research underscores just how long those effects will last.

A striking new study published yesterday in the journal Nature Communications suggests that sea-level rise—one of the biggest consequences of global warming—will still be happening 300 years from now, even if humans stop emitting greenhouse gases before the end of the current century.

What’s more, the longer it takes to start reducing global emissions, the higher those future sea levels will be. The study suggests that for every additional five years it takes for emissions to peak and start falling—for instance, if emissions were to reach their maximum levels in the year 2030, as opposed to 2025—sea levels will rise an additional 8 inches by the year 2300.

“The Paris Agreement calls for emissions to peak as soon as possible,” researcher Carl-Friedrich Schleussner of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, one of the study’s co-authors, said in a statement about the new paper. “This might sound like a hollow phrase to some, but our results show that there are quantifiable consequences of delaying action.”

In other words, this is about government funded scientists backing a government solution to a made up issue.

Within these scenarios, the new study finds that sea levels will likely rise by between 2.3 and 4 feet by the year 2300—and they’ll likely continue to rise even beyond that point.

Of course, this is all just un-scientific scaremongering, because they can’t actually prove this, there’s no control group, and no one will remember this garbage in 2300.

There’s still a great deal of uncertainty associated with sea-level projections, particularly so far in the future, that largely hinges on scientists’ developing understanding of how the world’s ice sheets will respond to continued warming and the physical processes that mold those responses. Recent research tends to suggest that the future may carry more risks than previously suspected and that human societies should be planning accordingly.

Ya think? It’s all guesswork from Cultists, based on wishful thinking, crystal balls, and computer models.

Read: Doom Today: Seas Will Totally Rise For 300 Years Because You Had A Burger »

Posted in AGW Scaremongering, Global Warming | 8 Comments | Trackback URL

Bummer: Single (Illegal Alien) Mom Is Totally Paralyzed With Fear

By William Teach February 21, 2018 – 8:08 am

Suppose you’re a single mom or dad and make the conscious decision that you’re going to commit a crime. You get away with the crime, but now you’re living in fear that law enforcement will catch up with you, arrest you, then put you in jail, separating you from your kids. Who’s at fault?

A single mom, undocumented, living in the shadows of Ice

…

Maria – a pseudonym – says “it’s the little details you don’t think about” that make life difficult for her and other 11 million undocumented people living in the US. She routinely sees her three children noticing the differences between them and their classmates. “Other people get in the car, buckle the kids up, put the heat up and drive. I can’t do that.”

In Portugal, Maria was a professional seamstress. A fine career, but she still couldn’t make ends meet. Working seven days a week only covered the basic bills and rent, even with a joint income. Her then husband sometimes worked construction or other odd jobs. “Anything else I grew on my own, like fruits, vegetables … I had animals”.

Portuguese citizens are one of 38 nationalities exempt from needing a tourist Visa. As a part of the Visa Waiver Program, they can lawfully remain in the US for up to 90 days. The family flew to New Jersey in 2002.

Once there, Maria and her family made the decision to stay. She hoped to find a stable job that could afford them savings, and schooling for herself and her daughter. They settled well into Newark’s Portuguese community, and soon Maria found consistent work as a housecleaner through a friend. She had two other boys.

She and her family made the conscious decision to violate U.S. federal law. This is not the fault of the United States and its citizens. We bear no responsibility for her criminal behavior. This is on her head.

Today, she is a single mom of three and her household’s sole source of income. She starts her day at 5:15am six days a week by watching the news before heading to the gym where she works maintenance. It pays substantially better than housecleaning.

How is this gym employing her? She has no authorization to work. Either they’re employing her illegally or she has committed identity theft, which can harm actual U.S. citizens. She claims she has no social security number later in the article, which, of course, is meant to be a tear jerker and tell us all how wonderful illegal aliens are and that we should simply reward them with citizenship for breaking our laws.

Living in New Jersey, and with her ex-husband in prison, Maria feels safe and at home – but the fear of deportation, and being separated from her children, is paralyzing. She also fears for her personal safety. “If I have to go back, he’s going to be there and I’m going to be dead,” Maria says, referring to her ex- husband.

Though she has never committed a crime – in fact, she has filed her taxes every year since 2002 – she and her daughter are on Ice’s radar. The morning after Maria returned home from the hospital, two officers knocked on her door. She let them in.

“I was terrified. I thought that they were there for me. I didn’t think I had a choice. They demanded me to give them my ex-husband’s passport”. She did.

At the end of the day, she put herself in this position. And every illegal seems to have a Story Of Woe (he ex-husband is a nutjob who raped her 17 year old daughter and threatened to kill people). But, this is Not Our Problem. The illegals, like “Maria”, put themselves in this position. Are we supposed to reward 11 million plus illegals with citizenship, or even just resident status, for their bad behavior?

Perhaps we could take care of our own, first. Our homeless, our veterans, our poor, our downtrodden.

Read: Bummer: Single (Illegal Alien) Mom Is Totally Paralyzed With Fear »

Posted in Illegal Immigration | 9 Comments | Trackback URL

Shameless: NY Times Trots Out A “Won’t Someone Think Of The Children” Meme On Guns

By William Teach February 21, 2018 – 7:40 am

Just because some nutjob went nutjob doesn’t mean you get to take away my Constitutional Rights. That’s the whole purpose of the Bill of Rights: it’s about restricting what the Federal government cannot do, not saying what We The Citizens can do. And because the government dropped the ball doesn’t mean you can take away my rights.

People thought MSNBC’s Katy Tur was bad with this one

https://twitter.com/LizWFB/status/966029271025283072

Well, this is the NY Times Editorial Board, and, regardless of their utter bias, the NY Times is one of the top newspapers in the world

Will America Choose Its Children Over Guns?

As surely as there are camels’ backs and straws to break them, moments arrive when citizens say they’ve had enough, when they rise up against political leaders who do not speak for them and whose moral fecklessness imperils lives. We may be witness to such a moment now with the protests by American teenagers sickened — and terrified — by the latest mass murder at the hands of someone with easy access to a weapon fit for a battlefield, not a school.

Yeah, you’d be in big trouble with a single shot rifle on a battlefield. But, then, the handguns the armed security at the NY Times building are also weapons one finds on a battlefield. And military members carry knives into battle. Do we ban them?

These kids have had enough. They’ve had enough of empty expressions of sympathy in the wake of the sort of atrocities they’ve grown up with, like last week’s mass shooting that took 17 lives at a high school in Parkland, Fla. Enough of the ritualistic mouthing of thoughts and prayers for the victims. Enough of living in fear that they could be next in the cross hairs of a well-armed deranged killer, even with all the active shooter drills and lockdowns they’ve gone through. Enough of craven politicians who kneel before the National Rifle Association and its cynically fundamentalist approach to the Second Amendment.

They’d have a lot more classmates if the craven politicians, and editorial boards, who kneel before Planned Parenthood, did something to reduce murdering the unborn. I’m not going to slam the kids: they’re being whipped up into a frenzy by adult groups. Most have zero idea how the world works. But, they should remember, when you enter the big game of politics, when you’re trying to take away people’s rights, you make yourself fair game. There are some who go to far (such as Gateway Pundit), and have been slammed by fellow people on the Right, but, just because they’re kids doesn’t exempt them from criticism when deserved.

Anyhow, let’s see what the NY Times is proposing

To be effective, any movement needs a realistic program, not mere emotion. Otherwise, it risks coming and going in a flash with little to show for itself. A tighter federal system of background checks is a start, to better monitor would-be gun buyers with mental illness, for example, or histories of gun violence. Such a program should also include reinstating a nationwide ban on assault weapons — a state measure died in the Florida Legislature Tuesday — and ending an absurd prohibition against using federal public health funds to study gun violence.

Um

How about we start with enforcing our existing laws? How about they start properly reporting people to the FBI database as they’re supposed to? A ban on scary looking guns won’t make a difference. It didn’t last time, and won’t this time. However, this is not what the Times really wants

What the young protesters are saying now is: Put down the guns. We’re your children.

How can anyone not heed their pained voices?

What the Times wants is banning guns. And end to the 2nd Amendment. Just because voices are in pain doesn’t mean you get to take away my Rights.

Read: Shameless: NY Times Trots Out A “Won’t Someone Think Of The Children” Meme On Guns »

Posted in 2nd Amendment, Barking Moonbats | 31 Comments | Trackback URL

‘Climate Change’ (scam) To Accelerate Wacky Weather In Near Future Or Something

By William Teach February 20, 2018 – 4:40 pm

When in the near future? They don’t say

Climate change to accelerate extreme weather events in near future

Heat waves are expected to become more frequent and more intense, if we continue to emit these warming greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. The unprecedented extreme weather that we’ve seen over the past year is clearly a result of human activities.

Unprecedented!!!!!1!!!!!

The types of events that occurred in 2017 was long back predicted by the scientists. Warming of the earth and oceans would supply more energy to intensify hurricanes and killer storms, there would be fewer rainfall events, creating more widespread drought. Moreover, more moisture in the atmosphere would increase the amount of heavy rainfall leading to Harvey and Irma like floods that the world has seen in the past few years.

So, drought and flood! More rainfall and less rainfall. Do we need to even discuss their completely failed prognostications regarding tropical systems and “killer storms”, as they dried up for over a decade?

Looking at the unprecedented events, clearly the impact these of climate changes is no longer subtle as the cost of inaction is already far greater than the cost of action. It is sure that soon, the Greenland ice sheet and the west Antarctic Ice Sheet will be seen melting and sea levels will be seen rising.

Things are seen getting worse day by day, we need to do is to take the steps earliest possible in the form of decreasing our emissions and transitioning from fossil fuels to renewable energy to save the earth.

Day by day! And in the near future, doom! And there was even a handy dandy graphic of what will happen sometime in the “near future”

Read: ‘Climate Change’ (scam) To Accelerate Wacky Weather In Near Future Or Something »

Posted in AGW Scaremongering, Global Warming | 6 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach February 20, 2018 – 1:00 pm

…is a horrible fossil fueled vehicle, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Small Dead Animals, with a post on media collusion.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

Surprise: Humans Reversed Global Cooling Per Pollen Data

By William Teach February 20, 2018 – 10:50 am

If we did, that would be a good thing, would it not? Remember the 75 million killed by the Black Plague during the beginning of the last cool period? How about all the wars, famine, strife? And how Mankind jumped ahead in technology, life expansion, medicine, women’s rights, and so forth during this warm period?

Pollen data shows humans reversed natural global cooling
Current temperatures are hotter than at any time in the history of human civilization

That subhead is astounding. Human civilization has charitably been around for 6,000 years, and modern humans for around 200,000 years. Can they prove it has never been hotter? Meh, that doesn’t matter to cultists, it’s all about the Narrative.

In order to understand today’s global warming, we need to understand how Earth’s temperatures varied in the past. How does the rapid warming we see now compare with past natural climate changes? Also, how long have humans been having an impact on the climate? These are some questions that can be answered through paleoclimate studies. Paleoclimate research uses natural measurements of the Earth’s temperature. Clever scientists are able to estimate how warm or cold the Earth was far back in time, way before we had thermometers.

An estimate is not hard data.

What the authors found was very interesting. Using data from 642 sites across North America and Europe, the temperatures they found closely matched those expected from computer simulations. They found that throughout most of the Holocene period (the last ~11,000 years), the Earth was warming very slightly. Only in the last ~2000 years has the Earth been in a cooling period (which probably would have continued except that human emissions of greenhouse gases have now reversed the cooling).

Probably? So, they don’t actually know? Hmph.

The authors attempted to put the recent warming (last century or so) into context. They found that the recent temperatures are much higher than temperatures over the past 11,000 years. In fact, according to their calculations, 2016 was warmer than 99.41% of all simulated Holocene years.

So, this is all based on computer models?

This finding is profound. First of all, it means that human greenhouse gas emissions were easily able to overturn what should be a natural cooling trend. Second, the warming we have caused is far outside of the natural range.

Which is funny, since Warmists tend to blame nature when their prognostications fail to materialize.

We have now pushed the Earth’s environment outside of where it should be. There are consequences for this disruption. Those consequences will include significant sea level rise, changes to rain/drought patterns, acidification of ocean waters, and a warmer atmosphere and ocean. There is still time to stop some of the coming climate change, but we are rapidly running out of time. The longer we delay, the worse things will get.

Right! Let’s get back to the time we all lived in huts with no electricity, had unreliable food, women died a lot during child birth, and we all prayed to the gods for a good harvest and pleasant weather.

Read: Surprise: Humans Reversed Global Cooling Per Pollen Data »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, AGW Scaremongering, Global Warming | 10 Comments | Trackback URL

Illegal Alien Trying To Go Through Correct Process Is Arrested By ICE And This Is Mean Or Something

By William Teach February 20, 2018 – 8:03 am

We have another poster child for the illegal alien supporters, one who was just trying to do the Right Thing, you guys, as Jeff Gamage and the Philly Inquirer show their bias

Seeking legal status in America, immigrant grabbed in Philly by ICE and jailed

Let’s write that correctly: “Attempting to game the system, previously deported illegal alien in Philly picked up by duly tasked ICE and jailed.”

Paul Frame says his husband, Jose “Ivan” Nunez, was doing exactly what immigration critics always demand — “getting in line,” filing papers “the right way” so he could live in America legally.

Three weeks ago, the married couple were in the middle of an interview with officials at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in West Philadelphia, Frame and his supporters say, when ICE agents showed up, locked Nunez in handcuffs, and took him away.

He is now in custody at the York County Detention Center, where federal authorities frequently hold undocumented immigrants.

Frame is lucky that law enforcement rarely ever charges citizens with violation of federal statutes on illegal immigration, such as 8 US Code 1324 about sheltering illegal aliens. Anyhow, what we mean about “getting in line” is going through the whole legal process, not sneaking into the country, marrying a citizen, then trying to game the system

Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials said in a statement that Nunez had been previously removed from the United States in August 2010. People who reenter the U.S. after being removed or deported can be charged with a felony offense — although that can be rare. Nunez, for instance, was never charged.

What occurred in his case, his supporters said, is what commonly happens at the Mexico-U.S. border: Nunez was stopped when he attempted to enter the country, briefly detained, then quickly sent back. It’s common enough that people who are returned to Mexico often don’t even realize the U.S. government may consider them to have been deported. Many of them attempt to return within a day or so — as Nunez did, and succeeded.

ICE officials said in their statement that while the agency focuses on people who pose a threat, “all of those in violation of the immigration laws may be subject to immigration arrest, detention, and, if found removable by final order, removal from the United States.”

It really is that simple. Why is this so hard to understand?

Frame and Nunez met at a wedding in 2014, and were married in Chester County on April 9, 2016.

“He is the love of my life,” Frame said.

OK, then you can apply for citizenship in Mexico. They have a process, too. And will throw you in jail immediately if you violate it.

Frame described himself as scared and nervous over his husband’s fate. He can understand, he said, how people here without legal documents would be afraid to try to become citizens.

“I’m mad,” he said, “because we were trying to do the right thing.”

No, you didn’t. The right thing would have been Nunez going back to Mexico and applying for citizenship.

Read: Illegal Alien Trying To Go Through Correct Process Is Arrested By ICE And This Is Mean Or Something »

Posted in Illegal Immigration, Wonky Media | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

Dan Rather Network Gives “5 Things More Difficult To Buy Than Guns” The Old Pre-School Try

By William Teach February 20, 2018 – 7:44 am

The network that brought you fabricated documents that weren’t verified in the least due to political bias is doing stupid things yet again. I wonder if they plan to give up the armed security at all their properties, as well as stop using guns in their TV shows? Anyhow, this is about as click-baity as click bait goes, where average, rational people are going to say “you people are nuts”

5 things that are more complicated than buying a gun in Florida

…

To get an AR-15, gun store owner Moto Adika told CBS News correspondent Adriana Diaz: “If you are a law-abiding citizen, then we can sell you that gun. The whole process can take no more than 15 minutes.”

Yes, after filling out a federal background check form and showing your ID. And you can’t take it with you unless you already have a concealed carry permit. How long does cBS think it takes to fill out a form with your name and address, then enter it into a website? Anyhow, it’s supposed to be easier to buy cold medicine

Don’t expect to be able to stockpile Sudafed for your winter sniffles. Florida State law prohibits consumers from purchasing more than nine grams of common cold medication like Sudafed within a 30-day period. It’s also illegal to purchase more than three packages at once. This is because the medication contains an ingredient called pseudoephedrine, used to create the illegal drug methamphetamine. In 2016, 327 people died from methamphetamine use in Florida. That same year, 2,559 gun deaths were recorded in the state. You can buy as many guns as you like at one time in Florida — most gun purchases are not registered.

In order to purchase common cold medication, like Sudafed, customers are required to show a form of photo identification that proves they are at least 18 years old. Each purchase is recorded within a store’s database to monitor the amount sold over the counter.

You don’t have to fill out a federal form for which you can be prosecuted for lying, nor do you need to wait 5 days to take possession of your purchase. Hey, perhaps liberals could have not glorified the production of meth in the show Breaking Bad. Oh, and then there’s a marriage license

Hoping for a shotgun wedding in Florida? Hold your fire. (oh, that was cute) State residents must either attend a premarital course or wait the mandatory three days before the marriage license takes effect. There is no waiting period for shotgun purchases in Florida but there is a three-day cooling-off period for handgun purchases, and a five-day waiting period for guns like the AR-15 in certain counties. That’s waived if you have a concealed carry license.

To obtain a marriage license in Florida, both parties must be at least 18 years old. Minors must provide consent from both of their parents or a legal guardian. Photo identification is required for all ages.

Still sounds harder to get a gun permit. They then cover fertilizer, for anyone buying more than 25 pounds (you can make bombs with it), and one must be screened on the terrorist watch list. Did you know that happens when you buy a motor vehicle? Hmph. But, that’s it. Somehow, that’s harder than buying a gun. Which would also see you checked on the terrorist watch list.

And buying large amounts of anti-diarrhea medicine? The FDA might want to talk to you. And we all buy large quantities, am I right?

Medical marijuana is available for purchase in Florida, however, it is illegal under federal law. Licensed dispensaries are only allowed to sell medical marijuana to qualified customers.

One must get your doctor’s permission. ZOMG! Of course, you’re still a criminal under the eyes of the feds.

As Red State points out, this is just garbage reporting, making things up, which shows this isn’t about reporting, it’s about a Narrative.

Say, you know what’s a lot easier to do than purchase a gun in every state? Or killing a person convicted and sentenced to die?

Killing an unborn baby.

Read: Dan Rather Network Gives “5 Things More Difficult To Buy Than Guns” The Old Pre-School Try »

Posted in 2nd Amendment, Journalistic Malpractice | 12 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove