…is a lawn dying from too much carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Bunkerville, with a post on a report that Dr. Ford had no fear of flying and was coached for the polygraph.
Read: If All You See… »
…is a lawn dying from too much carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Bunkerville, with a post on a report that Dr. Ford had no fear of flying and was coached for the polygraph.
Read: If All You See… »
REMINDER: Tomorrow, 10/3 at 2:18 PM EDT, there will be a nationwide test of the Wireless Emergency Alert system, in coordination w/ @FCC. You’ll get a message on your phone with a tone & vibration. This is not a text & your phone number is not shared with anyone. pic.twitter.com/317vmFA1vY
— Homeland Security (@DHSgov) October 2, 2018
I really just wanted to post this tweet
— Caprice Conley ???????? (@CapriceFilms) October 3, 2018
Read: Don’t Forget The Test Of The Emergency Alert System Today »
One has to wonder why all the Warmists in California aren’t giving up their own use of fossil fuels and buying fully electric vehicles
How fighting climate change will raise California gas prices even higher
Last year the California Legislature raised gasoline taxes by 12 cents a gallon, and conservatives were so outraged they launched an effort to repeal it at the ballot box. Proposition 6 comes up for a vote in November.
Now, with considerably less fanfare, the state’s air-pollution agency has enacted a regulation that will raise gas prices as much as 36 cents a gallon by 2030 – and diesel by 44 cents. Californians already pay an average $3.73 a gallon for gas, or 85 cents above the national average.
The projected increases are part of the latest effort by the California Air Resources Board to fight climate change. The board last week voted to strengthen the state’s “low carbon fuel standard,†a fairly obscure regulation that requires oil refiners and makers of other fuels to reduce the “carbon intensity†of their products, including the greenhouse gases generated during production and distribution of the fuels.
As it is, the seven-year-old regulation costs California motorists an estimated 12 cents a gallon at the pump, according to Irvine energy consultant Stillwater Associates. The oil industry, which has been fighting the Air Resources Board over the rule for years, said the latest decision makes a bad regulation even worse.
It might not seem a lot, but, consumers won’t just be paying this directly, but, also through businesses passing on those extra costs via increase prices of goods and services. Then you combine this with all the other things and the middle and lower classes get hosed by the moneyed class which runs the government and the rich folks pushing this nonsense. I wonder when these governments and rich Warmists will practice what they preach?
The lone comment at the article notes
One of the greatest sources for carbon is Humans, spewing out carbon dioxide, by breathing, 24 hours a day. 365 days a year! Multiply that by 40 million people, all breathing at the same time!
California is wasting a great taxing opportunity here, but I’m sure they’ll rectify that in the future, calling for a breathing tax to mitigate the damage you’re causing by just being alive….Welcome to California!
Don’t give them ideas.
Read: Surprise: Californians To Pay Even More To Fight ‘Climate Change’ »
Remember, this is the same paper that couldn’t be bothered with anything in Obama’s background, such as his years at college. Nor could they really be bothered about Operation Fast and Furious, IRS targeting, Obama’s buddy domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, and so much more. Nor could they really be bothered about Hillary Clinton’s background. Her lies, her smears, her potential illegal activity. They didn’t care much about her illegal use of an outside, unsecured server for her email and all the classified documents and content. Nor about things like the allegations of rape and sexual assault against her husband, with her as a participant who worked to destroy the women. Nor shady land deals. We were told that was “old news”. Now, here’s Molly Hemingway of The Federalist
The New York Times Preparing Hit Piece On Brett Kavanaugh For Party Planning
Having failed to corroborate any allegations of rape against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, The New York Times is now preparing to smear him for organizing party planning and logistics more than 30 years ago. This comes on the heels of a blockbuster Times report alleging that Kavanaugh might have thrown ice at someone at some point in the 1980s.
The Times is calling around to classmates asking them about a letter Kavanaugh allegedly wrote to a classmate to organize a week at the beach during the 1980s, according to multiple sources. The letter notes the location on the Maryland shore where the classmates planned to stay, the estimated costs for each organizer, and items they should bring with them, such as “sheets, pillowcases, blankets, etc.â€
The letter noted that a total of eight friends, including Kavanaugh, were “in charge†and that they would each get to have beds to sleep in at the designated rental property and a say in who else was invited. The tongue-in-cheek note, infused with inside jokes, said they should talk to neighbors of the property ahead of time and give them a heads up that a party would be hosted there and that alcohol and obnoxious students would be involved.
“P.S. It would probably be a good idea on Sat. the 18th to warn the neighbors that we’re loud, obnoxious drunks with prolific pukers among us,†the letter said. The note also joked that “the danger of eviction is great and that would suck because of the money and because this week has big potential.â€
The Times wouldn’t actually run with this, right? A piece on party planning with boys bragging, right?
Exclusive: We obtained a handwritten 1983 letter that Brett Kavanaugh wrote to his high school buddies: "We're loud, obnoxious drunks with prolific pukers among us." My story with @katekelly @RebeccaRuiz @SteveEder https://t.co/wLkn7T5nlL
— David Enrich (@davidenrich) October 2, 2018
The web front page headline is “We’re loud, obnoxious drunks,” Judge Kavanaugh wrote of his high school clique in 1983
The beachfront property was rented, the guests were invited and an ever-organized Brett M. Kavanaugh had some advice for the seven Georgetown Preparatory School classmates who would be joining him for the weeklong escapade.
In a 1983 letter, a copy of which was reviewed by The New York Times, the young Judge Kavanaugh warned his friends of the danger of eviction from an Ocean City, Md., condo. In a neatly written postscript, he added: Whoever arrived first at the condo should “warn the neighbors that we’re loud, obnoxious drunks with prolific pukers among us. Advise them to go about 30 miles…†(snip)
Recent interviews with more than a dozen classmates and friends from that time depict Judge Kavanaugh as a member of a small clique of football players who dominated Georgetown Prep’s work-hard, play-hard culture. His circle celebrated a culture of heavy drinking, even by the standards of that era.
Seriously, this is what the NY Times has come to, trying to embarrass the judge over a beach trip in 1983
We told Kavanaugh's lawyers everything we planned to report. This was their only comment: pic.twitter.com/H4ZjINwGjV
— David Enrich (@davidenrich) October 2, 2018
And that’s what the White House notes. Heck, a lot of private school kids, especially if it was a boarding school, didn’t drink that much, they smoked a lot of marijuana. And sometimes other drugs like microdots (lower grade LSD mixed with other stuff, often called mescaline or mesc. It wasn’t. Looks like a small piece of cut up large spaghetti), blotters (paper with higher power LSD on it), psychedelic mushrooms, and hash. It’s a lot harder to hide the smell of alcohol. And a lot harder to purchase for weekends. During the summers, it was still harder to get a hold of.
But, none of that matters, because this is what it has come to. The NY Times is invested in stopping Judge Kavanaugh, and there is no proof that the Judge committed any of the sexual assaults he’s accused of.
Do you have any conception of how deranged you sound to non-insane people? The NYT’s uncovers … a high school letter that describes typical teenage behavior. https://t.co/yOqGtW3UJl
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) October 2, 2018
Read: NY Times Is Super Concerned About Kavanaugh’s Party Planning »
If only you had given up your fossil fueled family vacations and agreed to pay carbon taxes
Baseball fans dodging more cold snaps, heavy rainfall as climate patterns change
The seats were sparse at last week’s rain-delayed match against the Pittsburgh Pirates, rain ponchos were the attire of the day and the tarp over the infield was peppered by driving rain. It’s been a common sight at Wrigley Field and ballparks across the country this year.
In the 2018 season, 53 games have been postponed because of weather, tied for the second most since Major League Baseball began keeping track in 1986. It wasn’t just rain-outs that disrupted the schedule but a lingering April cold snap in the Midwest and Northeast that resulted in 28 games postponed that month — an all-time high.
Of course, no one can control the weather. But some fans wonder how much these postponements could be mitigated by increased attention to forecasts and scheduling around regional weather. The climate is changing, and as the atmosphere warms, scientists say extreme weather events are becoming more frequent and, in some cases, more pronounced. (snip)
In a sport that spans three seasons, fans like Al Yellon say MLB needs to address the weather.
Heat waves and heavy rainfall events are on the rise, scientists say. Hurricane season is more active and storms more intense. Rising temperatures in the Arctic may also be causing the polar jet stream — a current of air that acts as a barrier between the south and cold air masses to the north — to slow and allow cold air to ooze farther south as it did this past spring.

Scientists have pointed to climate change as a contributing factor to the warming of the atmosphere, carrying the chance for more rain in some areas since warmer air can hold more moisture. According to state climatologist Jim Angel, northern and central Illinois are experiencing warmer, wetter springs. But some scientists believe the rapid warming of the Arctic is causing fluctuations in the polar jet stream that can bring unusual bouts of cold like the region saw in April, Angel said.
No one really kept track of the weather and temperature prior to 1980, so there’s no real note of comparison, but, here’s 1982
April 9, 1982, Cubs 5, Mets 0, game time temperature 34
This was the home opener after the Cubs had split a pair in Cincinnati, the very first home opener for the team under Tribune Co. ownership after decades of Wrigley family ownership.
And just four days before this game, a huge snowstorm clobbered Chicago:
On April 5, 1982, the Chicago area was hit by a major late-season storm that officially delivered 9.4 inches of snow.
Doesn’t matter, still your fault.
Read: Your Fault: Baseball Fans Are Dodging More ‘Climate Change’ Cold Snaps And Rain »
…is a sea that will soon rise hundreds of feet, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Animal Magnatism, with a post on your daily confirmation vote news.
Read: If All You See… »
It’s all about attempting to protect those who are illegally present in the U.S. while also enticing more to come illegally
Bill would block ICE from arresting immigrant child sponsors
A bipartisan group of lawmakers are seeking to prevent the Trump administration from arresting undocumented immigrants who come forward to take care of undocumented immigrant children who are in the country alone, after CNN reported such arrests were happening.
A bill set to be introduced Tuesday comes as both the number of immigrant children in government custody and the length of time those children are being detained are skyrocketing. The Trump administration’s own policies are at least partly responsible for the increase in both numbers and hundreds of children are being sent to a temporary tent facility in Texas set up to accommodate them.
The bill would bar the government from using a sponsor’s undocumented status as a reason to deny releasing a child to them, and it would prevent the Department of Homeland Security from using information provided by a potential child sponsor to arrest or deport an undocumented immigrant.
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Florida Democrat, said CNN’s reporting had prompted her to draft the legislation, which will be introduced with at least a dozen other Democrats and GOP Rep. Carlos Curbelo of Florida.
Oooooh, one Republican, who is about as squishy as it gets on illegal immigration. Think CNN would call it bipartisan if a dozen Republicans and one Democrat were set to introduce a bill on limiting late term abortion?
CNN confirmed last month that dozens of immigrants who came forward to sponsor children out of custody had been arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement from July to September, 70% of whom were arrested only on immigration violations.
Perhaps it’s not the best idea to place children with people who have already shown that they’ll violate the laws of the U.S., especially when we know nothing about them. This bill by DWS is actually amending the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 to make it so that DHS can never use the information about the sponsors being illegal against them ever. And, it’s interesting that she would use this Act in placing children who were sent by their parents, or trafficked, with people who are unknown.
Christine Todd Whitman, formally governor of New Jersey totally convinces me that man-caused climate change is real, and that mankind is mostly/solely responsible! The original headline was something about Republicans reclaiming our tradition
Gov. Whitman: I’m glad to see Republicans recognizing climate change. Now they must do something
During my time as both governor of New Jersey and administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, I knew that I’d be judged by my actions. All the speeches and public appearances in the world won’t convince people you’ve done your job unless you produce results.
That’s how we need to judge our elected officials when it comes to climate change.
Because climate change has become needlessly partisan, I am always heartened when a fellow Republican recognizes the seriousness of the issue. More elected Republicans are now publicly acknowledging the truth: climate change is real and humans are the leading cause of it.
However, too many Republican elected officials who know better — even those who have publicly recognized the problem of climate change – are still refusing to go beyond words. The Climate Solutions Caucus in Congress has 44 Republican members, but the vast majority of them continue to vote against real solutions or in support of measures damaging to our environment and health. A recent vote brought before the House of Representatives saw Republicans overwhelmingly reject the idea of making major industries pay for the dangerous pollution they emit in our air. Most frustratingly, these same members have offered no suggestions of their own.
Funny that she’s totally for making Someone Else pay, yet refuses to give up her own big carbon life. Oh, and all this about making major industries pay means those costs trickle down to the consumers, who aren’t rich like Whitman.
Like most Republicans, I am a firm believer in free market solutions. And hearteningly, there are a small number of Republicans bringing market-based approaches to address climate change. Rep. Carlos Curbelo of Florida did just that when he introduced a bill over the summer calling for a price on carbon pollution that would bring about infrastructure investment, regulatory stability, and tax reforms based on conservative, free market principals. But unfortunately plans like Curbelo’s have been the exception, and not the rule.

She’s using a phrase I don’t think she understands. Implementing a government run tax/fee is 180 degrees away from being a free market solution (though she tries to weasel a bit by leaving out “free”). Free market solution means the market does it, not the government. When the few Republican Warmists out there go down this road, they’re even more disingenuous than the leftists who push this, because the Republicans are supposed to be for an actual free market, not yammer out weasel words in an attempt to increase the size and scope of government.
I am not saying that conservatives should simply adopt the policies of Democrats on climate change. Republicans can stand for a clean environment and market principles. But we can’t stand on the sidelines. We must enter this debate with our own ideas, and push for policies that cut the pollution intensifying havoc across our country and world. And token cuts are not enough, we must reduce emissions and move toward clean energy as fast as the science of climate change demands.
First, this is exactly the Democrats idea. Most aren’t positioning a carbon tax/fee as a free market solution (except for those few who are lying about it being a FMS). Next, why would we do anything when the proof of mankind being mostly/solely responsible is beyond weak and doesn’t rely on the scientific method and testable and reproducible facts. Third, intensifying havoc? Good grief. Wackadoodle.
And to my fellow Republicans who are in the Congress, we must do better. Our party has a great history of environmental protection. Let’s reclaim that.
Ah, that’s where the original headline came from. CO2 is plant food. It’s necessary for life. It isn’t dangerous to humans until you get into the thousands of parts per million in a closed environment. Earth has survived much higher levels, and is doing fine at just over 400ppm.
But, if she’s worried about the environment, then let’s demolish all those big liberal cities with all their fossil fueled vehicles, cities which tend to have much higher carbon footprints than suburban/rural areas, and cause a massive urban heat island effect, and have erased nature.
Read: Christine Todd Whitman: A Carbon Tax is Totally The Free Market Or Something »