Jaguar Land Rover Boss: St. Greta, Extinction Rebellion Offer No Ideas

By William Teach March 8, 2020 – 9:08 am

Outgoing Jaguar Land Rover boss Ralf Speth is free to have Real Talk, since he is leaving JLR, so, he doesn’t have to worry about the typical verbal and written assaults and threats from members of the Cult of Climastrology which would occur against himself, his family, and JLR

Jaguar Land Rover boss says Greta Thunberg’s criticism ‘not justified’

The boss of Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) has hit out at Greta Thunberg, saying that climate activists like the Swedish teenager and Extinction Rebellion make “no contribution” and have “no ideas”.

Speaking to the Sunday Times (which is behind a paywall), Ralf Speth, JLR’s outgoing boss, described Thunberg’s campaigning as “doing wrong in many areas” by raising issues but not coming up with solutions on climate change.

Speth, whose decade-long tenure at the top of the luxury carmaker has seen the UK automotive industry battle the twin headwinds of Brexit and climate change, said her criticism was “not justified” because businesses had also created a better world.

“Greta created the wake-up call for many companies and people. But on the other hand, this kind of very populistic criticism — we destroyed her life, killed this and that — is not justified because we also created a better life. Wealth, health, education — the world is getting better”, he said.

Think quick: what has St. Greta offered to solve the (fake) climate crisis? Very, very little. She screeches quite a bit, as do her disciples, but, they demand that adults Do Something. Because coming up with ideas would be too much, apparently.

Speth is certainly correct that companies and people have made the world a better place, as have fossil fuels. No need to go into long details, because you’ll either immediately understand this, or you are a Warmist who will never believe any evidence.

“There is still a lot to do. But populism should be combined with ideas to make it better. There is no contribution, no ideas, just: ‘You’re all stupid.’ ”

She’s pretty much on a long “how dare you” moment, but, if you aren’t offering ideas and solutions, you’re just whining. St.Greta and her disciples run around, holding signs, chanting, marching (destroying the grass and leaving trash), but, they do not offer solutions for the crisis they believe is real and the apocalypse. Nor does Extinction Rebellion. But, then

It may have started with St. Greta attempting to do something about her anxiety by attempting to force her ideas on Everyone Else (instead of taking up a hobby or sport or something. Someone buy her a guitar), but, she has now learned that the CoC is not about climate, but hardcore Stateist politics. Extinction Rebellion isn’t much better.

Read: Jaguar Land Rover Boss: St. Greta, Extinction Rebellion Offer No Ideas »

Posted in AGW Scaremongering, Global Warming, New Climate Deniers | Comments Off on Jaguar Land Rover Boss: St. Greta, Extinction Rebellion Offer No Ideas | Trackback URL

Bummer: Our Pursuit Of Happiness Is Killing The Planet

By William Teach March 7, 2020 – 4:20 pm

You know, if these doomsday cultists would restrict their fearmongering to actual environmental issues, they’d have a point. Consumerism certainly causes damages. Disposable everything that ends up in landfills isn’t exactly the greatest, right? Smartphones are designed for you to get a new one every 1-3 years. They aren’t made to last like they used to. Today’s TVs are meant to be replaced every 4-5 years. I just too an old 30 inch square TV from 1988 to the recycling center, having replaced it with a small 1080p flat panel in the spare bedroom. The 30 inch TV actually still worked.

But, the cultists make everything about ‘climate change’

Our ‘Pursuit of Happiness’ Is Killing the Planet

As the coronavirus continues to spread, the chances that any one of us will be placed in quarantine goes up considerably. I know that being locked away like that would drive me nuts. Two weeks subtracted from my life! Still, I’d accept the justice of my confinement because I would recognize that my liberty had come to pose a real danger to my fellow humans.

Now, let’s ratchet up the sacrifice: Suppose you were required by law to turn the thermostat up to 75 in the summer, and down to 66 in the winter, in order to reduce your carbon footprint. The principle is the same: Your freedom to live as you wish turns out to jeopardize public well-being. I, for one, would bristle; I can’t stand being hot in summer. Maybe you wouldn’t mind. But what if you were also told that you had to eliminate most or all of the red meat from your diet? What if Greta Thunberg persuades President Sanders that we need to ration jet travel? At some point you’ll begin to think that the increasing globalization of bad things like climate change and infectious diseases is threatening liberal society.

Of course, that’s what the CoC wants: government telling you how to live your life, but unhappy when government tells themselves the same. Anyhow, writer James Traub talks about John Stuart Mills and the foundation of Classical Liberalism, vegetarian and vegans diets, about “The First Amendment doesn’t protect your right to eat steak”, and many other things, all warmups to get to the meat

Constant wasn’t thinking of Marie Antoinette’s right to play at shepherdess while her subjects starved, but the right to open a shop and build yourself a home rather than be drafted into Napoleon’s army spreading republicanism across the face of Europe. We moderns build institutions, and establish tacit norms, to guarantee the security of such private pleasures. That’s liberal individualism. But what do we do once we see that some of those choices threaten the health and lives of others? We will have to strike a new equilibrium between what society has the right to demand of us and what we have a right to retain for ourselves.

One is reminded of the old maxim “be careful what you wish for: you might get it.” Anyone thinking that giving government a bit more power won’t see government taking even more power is a fool.

The Dutch can reach consensus on painful social questions because they’ve spent the last thousand years working cooperatively to build dikes; the climate accord adopted last year came after a full year of discussion among representatives of all interest groups. That’s not how American democracy works, and especially so in recent years. We allow those interest groups to wage a pitched battle using all the money and influence they can muster against one another. Legislation emerges only after a war of attrition. That’s a very self-defeating way of doing business when all parties must be called on to sacrifice. At some point, presumably, things will get so bad that President Ocasio-Cortez

manages to ram a green-enough new deal through Congress. Then we’ll adjust our thermostats and go two-thirds vegan the same way we got used to the chaos and tedium of airport security check-ins: We’ll have no choice.

James seems rather taken by AOC and the Green New Deal. You can’t talk about freedom and choice in the same sentence as the GND, as it is all about Authoritarianism. But, then, that’s what the ‘climate change’ movement is about. Amazingly, after discussing Classical Liberalism and freedom, James fails to acknowledge how dangerous the movement is to freedom.

Read: Bummer: Our Pursuit Of Happiness Is Killing The Planet »

Posted in AGW Socialism, Global Warming, Unhinged Tools | 19 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach March 7, 2020 – 1:00 pm

…is a world turning to desert from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Brass Pills, with a post on Feminists demanding all men get screened by police after a breakup or divorce.

Double shot below the fold, so, check out Bustednuckles, with a post on why he likes President Trump.

Read More »

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 32 Comments | Trackback URL

Climate Cultists Seem Upset That Governments Are More Concerned Over Coronavirus Than ‘Climate Change’

By William Teach March 7, 2020 – 10:30 am

Apparently, both Coronavirus and ‘climate change’ are evil, as espoused by people with degrees in spreading awareness rather than science. Supposing they have degrees and aren’t blowing off their education

Climate change or coronavirus? ‘Pick your evil’, protesters say

Protesters at a rally led by climate activist Greta Thunberg on Friday denounced governments for taking urgent action against the coronavirus outbreak but failing to treat global warming as an emergency.

Several thousand people braved the rain in Brussels with the 17-year-old Swede, marching through the city that is home to the European Union’s main institutions.

“It is shameful that for so long the climate and environmental emergency has been ignored. We are still in a crisis that has never once been treated like a crisis,” Thunberg told the demonstrators in a speech.

Some supporters said they had put aside concerns about being infected with the coronavirus in a crowd to join the march.

“It’s pick your evil. Do you want to die from global warming or from coronavirus?” said Gorkem, 40, wearing a face mask.

“One of them gets much more attention than the other, so we are trying to raise a bit more awareness about what is already affecting all our lives.”

Flo, a filmmaker from the Belgian city of Ghent who attended with her baby daughter, said the rapid spread of the coronavirus had demonstrated that governments can respond to crises.

“You see people all crazy with coronavirus and you see that governments can do things to make everybody aware about a situation, to make things happen … But they do so little about climate change,” she said.

Because one is real, the other is fake. Of course, it really doesn’t help when the message is muddled.

So, Hotcoldwetdry, no war, Iran is cool, Marxism, and Coronavirus all in one photo. What’s the message? If you want to convince someone to buy your product, do you stay on message, or yammer on about all sorts of different things?

Read: Climate Cultists Seem Upset That Governments Are More Concerned Over Coronavirus Than ‘Climate Change’ »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

Reproductive Justice Needs To Be Part Of Hotcoldwetdry Research Or Something

By William Teach March 7, 2020 – 7:30 am

Warmists keep claiming that ‘climate change’ is all about science when Skeptics say it’s all about politics, then Warmists prove us right again and again

Integrating a Reproductive Justice Framework in Climate Research

Climate change is reshaping weather patterns, economies, and social structures and fundamentally altering the planet. The question is no longer why or if climate change is happening but how communities around the world will respond in order to safeguard human health, safety, and freedom.

While climate change affects both women and men, the way it is experienced differs significantly by gender. As a result, academic researchers, government agencies, and think tanks are making efforts to integrate a gender-specific lens into their climate research—an approach known as gender mainstreaming. While gender mainstreaming has led to more extensive research on the connection between climate change and women’s health and well-being, there is still more work to be done to capture these intersecting issues. Specifically, there is a dearth of research that uses a reproductive justice framework to better understand and respond to the inequitable effects that climate change has on women. Indeed, not all women experience climate change similarly, so simply applying a gender lens is oftentimes insufficient.

Coined by women of color activists in 1994, the term reproductive justice refers to a human rights framework that emphasizes a person’s right to have children or not and to parent the children they do have with dignity and in a safe environment. It links reproductive rights with social justice and demonstrates how the intersecting forms of oppression that some women—particularly Black, Latina, and Indigenous women—experience can affect their bodily autonomy and parenting decisions. These forms of oppression include facing discrimination in the health care system; being denied access to services based on income or immigration status; living in unsafe and unhealthy environments; or experiencing disparities in pay and overall economic security.

Let’s put this in plain English, rather than Barking Moonbat: they want to have the right to get pregnant through unsafe, irresponsible sex, then abort that baby willy nilly. And they’re linking the abortion on demand movement with doomsday Cult of Climastrology. Everything else mentioned later in the article, such as “poor menstrual health and hygiene,” are all diversions from the real issue, abortion, which is no surprise, being that this screed comes from the Center For American Progress, about as far left as you’re going to get.

And, pretty much everything the mention requires massive amounts of Big Centralized Government. Surprise?

Read: Reproductive Justice Needs To Be Part Of Hotcoldwetdry Research Or Something »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Global Warming, Unhinged Tools | 14 Comments | Trackback URL

Good Grief: Stores Have To Limit Toilet Paper Purchases From Panic Buying

By William Teach March 7, 2020 – 7:14 am

Down here in the South, and, let’s face it, many other places, if a winter storm is predicted people run to the store and buy milk, bread, water, and eggs. Same thing for a potential tropical storm. One time I saw the cookie aisle wiped out. Oh, and don’t forget to get the beer. The funny one is people buying microwave meals, when the power can go out. Also, I’ve been through plenty of storms, hurricanes, tropical storms, snow storms, ice storm, big thunderstorms, where the power goes out, and never needed to buy water. On several occasions there was no power, no cable, no phone (landline and wireless), yet, water stays on. Anyhow

‘It’s crazy’: Panic buying forces stores to limit purchases of toilet paper and masks

Rationing supplies. Overwhelmed delivery workers. Toilet paper protected by security guards.

This is the new reality for some retailers that are having to take drastic action to limit the number of toilet paper rolls, face masks and hand sanitizer bottles each person can buy as customers stockpile goods over fears of the novel coronavirus outbreak.

Australian supermarket chains Woolworths and Coles both began limiting toilet paper purchases to four packs per person this week. Costco Australia is also restricting how much toilet tissue, disinfectant, milk, eggs and rice each customer can buy.

In the United States, Kroger (KR) says it is capping individual purchases of “sanitization, cold and flu-related products,” while Home Depot (HD) is curbing the number of face masks in single orders placed online and in stores.

In the United Kingdom, Boots is limiting the purchase of hand sanitizer to two bottles per customer, and UK online grocer Ocado has advised customers to place orders further in advance in the wake of “exceptionally high demand.”

I can see wanting disinfectant, but, the rest? How is all that TP going to help you? Hand sanitizer won’t protect you. Face masks are for people who already have the flu (pretty smart to go to Home Depot for them, but, are they medically sound, or just to protect from dust and stuff during home building?).

At a Coles supermarket in Brisbane, Australia on Wednesday, toilet paper was completely sold out. One worker at the store told CNN Business that his shift had been hectic as customers mobbed the aisles.

When a new delivery of toilet rolls arrived that afternoon, workers didn’t even have time to unpack the goods before shoppers swooped in, he said.

Is this an Australian thing?

Sigh.

Read: Good Grief: Stores Have To Limit Toilet Paper Purchases From Panic Buying »

Posted in Current Affairs, Good Move Slick | 5 Comments | Trackback URL

Surprise: “More Accurate” Climate Model Projects Worse Doom

By William Teach March 6, 2020 – 3:22 pm

Funny how things always get more and more doomy with this cult, eh?

More accurate climate change model reveals bleaker outlook on electricity, water use

By 2030, global warming alone could push Chicago to generate 12% more electricity per person each month of the summer.

If the city generated any less electricity, it would be risking a power shortage that may require drastic measures to avoid rolling blackouts, according to projections from a model designed by Purdue University researchers.

That estimated increase is larger than previous projections because it takes into account how consumers use electricity and water at the same time. The model also considers a wider range of climate features that affect this mixed use, such as humidity and wind speed, making predictions more accurate. (snip)

In a study published Thursday (March 5) in the journal Climatic Change, the collaborative team applied this model to five other cities in the U.S. Midwest: Cleveland; Columbus, Ohio; Indianapolis; Madison, Wisconsin; and Minneapolis.

As a whole, the model projected that the Midwest will be using 19% more electricity and 7% more water. And that’s just during the summer.

So, doom? Anyhow, the “model” looked at this and that and some more, all in order to prognosticate doom

The model uses artificial intelligence to make predictions on climate change impact. As a learning algorithm, the model is fed years of data from a region’s utilities and weather services and then trained to predict changes in electricity and water use given certain climate-change scenarios.

These scenarios are when the earth’s temperature increases by 1.5 or 2.0 degrees Celsius above its mean temperature during the pre-industrial period, approximately 1881-1910.

So, grab your crystal balls, kids!

Read: Surprise: “More Accurate” Climate Model Projects Worse Doom »

Posted in AGW Scaremongering, Global Warming | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach March 6, 2020 – 1:00 pm

…is a climate killing dog, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Moonbattery, with a post on shopping in San Francisco.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 10 Comments | Trackback URL

Why Aren’t Young Folks Voting? Voter Suppression Or Something

By William Teach March 6, 2020 – 10:30 am

Every election cycle we are treated to all sorts of young folks who want Stuff Done and say they’ll vote this time and we know that they tend to vote Democrat because life hasn’t smacked them around yet, but, their votes tend to disappear come election day. Why?

Young People Aren’t Turning Out to Vote — but It’s Not Because They Don’t Care

The short answer? Voter suppression — which takes countless forms, including voter I.D. restrictions, inflexible work and school schedules that prevent citizens from taking time to vote, lack of civics education in schools, the sudden closing (or changing) of polling places, lack of childcare or eldercare, and hours-long wait times to cast a vote. A plethora of factors make voting in America less a thing everyone participates in, and more a competitive sport that seems to demand more training and planning than our systems currently offer.

“Instead of blaming young people and assuming they are tuned-out due to narcissism or apathy, we should work together across generations and institutions to remove voter impediments and implement best practices,” said Yael Bromberg, Chief Counsel for Voting Rights of The Andrew Goodman Foundation and Principal, Bromberg Law LLC. She explained that there are a range of obstacles placed in young peoples’ paths to vote, including the “over-reliance by young people on provisional ballots,” voter identification laws, and the issue of accessible polling locations. Bromberg conducted studies on youth voting rights and the twenty-sixth amendment, which also cited cuts to early voting and same-day registration, voter intimidation by election officials sharing misinformation, and gerrymandering as factors that threaten the youth vote.

Dismissing the 18 to 29-year-old voter demographic as apathetic or lazy does a disservice to the country: Instead of acknowledging the barriers that make it difficult or even impossible to vote, critics take the simpler route, rejecting a demographic as non-participatory rather than grappling with solving the systemic issues.

I’m 52: I’ve never had a problem getting to the voting booth. I’ve never had an issue with having a proper ID. Never had an issue with school or work schedules, especially with early voting. “A lack if civics in schools”? Which Party runs most of the education system? I never needed teachers to teach me how to vote, because it is freaking easy. You do research, which is a lot easier now than back in the 80’s and early 90’s, then you go vote. How hard is that? Why is it that people 30+ can deal with all these factors, including childcare and long wait times and such, yet, 29 and under can’t?

BTW, if you’re 21+, you aren’t a young person. You are a pure adult. And, with all this whining and Victimhood, we’re supposed to extend the vote to 16 and 17 year olds?

Mercedes Molloy, 19, a student at The New School, had her mother mail her the absentee ballot after it was sent to her parents’ house. After informally polling her peers at school, she found a lot of her college classmates were registered, but they didn’t vote because their ballot wasn’t sent to their college address it was sent home. The lack of guidance around absentee voting proves to be a “challenge for out of state students, specifically first-generation college students and first-time voters,” she said.

I had zero problem getting and mailing my ballot, attending ECU in NC while still being registered in NJ.

What this is really about is creating Excuses for when Trump wins in November.

Read: Why Aren’t Young Folks Voting? Voter Suppression Or Something »

Posted in Democrats, Elections | 5 Comments | Trackback URL

I Agree With St. Greta: EU Should Set Their Hotcoldwetdry Targets For 2020

By William Teach March 6, 2020 – 7:16 am

No, really, I think this is a great idea

Greta Thunberg tells EU to set emissions reduction goals for 2020

The EU’s executive unveiled a planned climate law to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions to zero by 2050.

“We cannot just have goals for 2030 or 2050. We also need them for 2020 because right now, if high emissions continue like today’s business as usual, then the remaining budget will be gone before we will even have a chance to deliver on those targets,” Thunberg said.

She’s right, you know, at least in terms of setting goals for 2020. Not for her Reasons, but, simply because the EU should be required to practice what it preaches. It’s super-easy to set these far flung goals, which so often get ignored or done away with. Walking the climatalk right now? That’s hard.

Anyhow

Thousands expected to join Greta Thunberg in Brussels climate march

Teen climate activist Greta Thunberg will be among the 5,000 demonstrators expected to march in the latest school strike for the climate in Brussels.

Organisers called for the participants to gather at Gare Centrale as they prepare to set out through Brussels at around 2:00 PM.

Police said traffic disruptions were to be expected from 1:30 PM and last until around 4:30, as the demonstrators make their way from downtown Brussels to the Parc Du Cinquantenaire.

I wonder what kind of environmental mess they will leave, and how many will be coming to the march in fossil fueled vehicles.

Read: I Agree With St. Greta: EU Should Set Their Hotcoldwetdry Targets For 2020 »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove