Federal Judge Rules Kentucky Church Restrictions Violate 1st Amendment

If Home Depot is allowed to be open, why not churches? If you can walk into a car dealership, why not a church? If you can go into a grocery store, why not a church? Especially when some churches are willing to do service outside, and even have in-car service

Federal judge gives churches major victory amid strict lockdown restrictions by Dem governor

A federal judge ruled Friday that all Kentucky churches will be allowed to hold in-person gatherings beginning this weekend so long as congregations abide by social distancing and other health guidelines from the CDC.

Tabernacle Baptist Church in Nicholasville, Kentucky, filed a lawsuit against Gov. Andy Beshear, a Democrat, this week to allow for in-person worship services. The church’s attorney said Beshear’s order prohibiting in-person services violates the First Amendment.

On Friday, U.S. District Judge Gregory Van Tatenhove agreed — at least for now.

According to the Lexington Herald-Leader, Van Tatenhove granted a temporary restraining order that prevents Beshear from “enforcing the prohibition on mass gatherings with respect to any in-person religious service which adheres to applicable social distancing and hygiene guidelines.”

Kentucky’s Constitution does mention freedom of religion, Bill of Rights, section 5

No preference shall ever be given by law to any religious sect, society or
denomination; nor to any particular creed, mode of worship or system of ecclesiastical
polity; nor shall any person be compelled to attend any place of worship, to contribute to
the erection or maintenance of any such place, or to the salary or support of any minister
of religion; nor shall any man be compelled to send his child to any school to which he
may be conscientiously opposed; and the civil rights, privileges or capacities of no person
shall be taken away, or in anywise diminished or enlarged, on account of his belief or
disbelief of any religious tenet, dogma or teaching. No human authority shall, in any case
whatever, control or interfere with the rights of conscience.

So, it’s mostly about no one being forced to engage in religion by anyone or government. But, notice that last line on conscience. In his ruling Judge Tatenhove wrote

But the governor, by executive order, has put a stop to that. He can do that, but he must have a compelling reason for using his authority to limit a citizen’s right to freely exercise something we value greatly—the right of every American to follow their conscience on matters related to religion. Despite an honest motive, it does not appear at this preliminary stage that reason exists.

Huh. He further wrote

“There is ample scientific evidence that COVID-19 is exceptionally contagious. But evidence that the risk of contagion is heightened in a religious setting any more than a secular one is lacking,” Van Tatenhove wrote. “If social distancing is good enough for Home Depot and Kroger, it is good enough for in-person religious services which, unlike the foregoing, benefit from constitutional protection.”

One can easily see many more lawsuits being filed this coming week, particularly in Democrat led states which all seem to have gone overboard on their restrictions.

Read: Federal Judge Rules Kentucky Church Restrictions Violate 1st Amendment »

Humidity And Heat On The Verge Of Being Beyond Human Survivability Or Something

It’s coming soon! Maybe! Possibly! They Think! We can solve this with a tax

Humidity and heat extremes are on the verge of exceeding limits of human survivability, study finds

Welcome to “Steambath Earth,” featuring sauna-like temperatures and humidity too high for humans to tolerate.

Extremely humid heat that is more intense than most Americans have experienced — approaching a crucial, immovable human survivability limit — has more than doubled in frequency in some coastal subtropical regions of the world since 1979, according to a study published Friday.

The study is the first to find that wet-bulb temperatures of 95 degrees Fahrenheit (35 Celsius) — which render ineffective the human heat response of sweating to shed heat through evaporation, leading to hyperthermia — are already occurring for short periods of time at a few weather stations.

These tend to occur in parts of the Persian Gulf shoreline and coastal southwest North America, where sizzling lands border sultry seas, as well as in northern South Asia, where extreme heat and humidity combinations overlap just before the annual monsoon season begins.

Doom!

With computer-model projections showing the world will continue to warm rapidly in response to increasing amounts of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, the study, published Friday in the journal Science Advances, warns that highly populated regions of the world will be rendered uninhabitable sooner than previously thought for parts of each year.

They don’t really say when “sooner” is. So, this is politics, not science. Further, there is nothing unusual going on than any other Holocene warm period.

Read: Humidity And Heat On The Verge Of Being Beyond Human Survivability Or Something »

If All You See…

…are wonderful trees which could stave off sea rise if we plant enough, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Legal Insurrection, with a post on Joe Biden’s youth enthusiasm problem.

Read: If All You See… »

Poll: 48% Say No In Person Religious Services Should Be Allowed During Bat Soup Virus

We’re apparently dictating Constitutional Rights by polls now

Poll: Most in US back curbing in-person worship amid virus

While the White House looks ahead to reopening houses of worship, most Americans think in-person religious services should be barred or allowed only with limits during the coronavirus pandemic — and only about a third say that prohibiting in-person services violates religious freedom, a new poll finds. (snip)

Just 9% of Americans think in-person religious services should be permitted without restrictions, while 42% think they should be allowed with restrictions, and 48% think they should not be allowed at all, the poll shows. Even among Americans who identify with a religion, 45% say in-person services shouldn’t be allowed at all.

White evangelical Protestants, however, are particularly likely to think that in-person services should be allowed in some form, with just 35% saying they should be completely prohibited. Close to half – 46% — also say they think prohibiting those services violates religious freedom.

Um, it rather does violate it. It’s baked into the First Amendment, and every state Constitution says something similar. Notice that the 1st Amendment actually starts out with Freedom of Religion (Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof) before speech, press, protesting. Government has no authority to stop worship. They can certainly ask the leaders to only hold services using social distancing, but, dictating it? No.

The Justice Department last month sided with a Mississippi church in its legal challenge to local limits on drive-in worship. Still, the poll found 56% of Americans say prohibiting drive-in services does not violate religious freedom.

Are Constitutional Rights are not up for polling.

Read: Poll: 48% Say No In Person Religious Services Should Be Allowed During Bat Soup Virus »

Prognostication: Global Seas Could Maybe Possibly Rise By 4 Feet By 2100

This won’t happen if you stop eating meat, stay home and only use solar power, only flush once a day, and give up your money and freedom to Government, you know

Climate crisis: Sea level ‘on course to rise by one metre by 2100’ if global emissions targets are missed

Sea levels could rise by more than one metre by the year 2100 and 5m by 2300 if global emissions targets are not achieved, according to a study.

Scientists at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore modelled projections from over 100 international experts for the global average sea level changes based on two climate scenarios.

In the low emissions scenario, in which global warming is limited to 2C above pre-industrial levels, experts estimate a rise of 0.5m by 2100 and 0.5m to 2m by 2300.

That’s 1.6 feet by 2100, despite sea rise being exactly average, 7-8 inches, over the 20th Century, and not accelerating at all so far in the 21st. Oh, and the temps not even rising by 1C over the last 170 years, since the end of the Little Ice Age.

In a high emissions scenario where global warming rises by 4.5C, the estimates surged between 0.6m and 1.3m by 2100 and 1.7m to 5.6m by 2300.

The study, which was published in science journal Nature, notes that melting ice shelves in the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets are the “largest potential contributors” to global mean sea level rise, as the biggest reservoirs of land-based ice on earth.

Of course, the high emission scenario is what all the articles yapping about this are pushing in their headlines.

It adds: “The multimeter global mean sea level rise (GMSL) rise projected by some experts… would expose up to hundreds of millions of people to coastal flooding and devastate coastal ecosystems.

“However, the expert projections also clearly illustrate the potential for evading such large GMSL rise through successful reduction of emissions.”

See? If you are made to cooperate things will only get slightly bad, not really bad. BTW, are there ever any penalties for scientists and such making prognostications that never materalize?

Read: Prognostication: Global Seas Could Maybe Possibly Rise By 4 Feet By 2100 »

Transcripts Show Obama Officials Knew There Was No Russia Collusion

OK, place your bets on the first Democrat to proclaim this is all a distraction from Bat Soup Virus? Democrats love trotting out the distraction meme when they know they are in trouble

Ex-Obama official, in released transcript, admits she didn’t know about Trump-Russia collusion despite prior claims

Evelyn Farkas, a former Obama administration official who previously encouraged congressional staffers to gather evidence of alleged collusion between President Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia and said she “knew” there was additional such information out there, admitted she did not know such information existed in a 2017 interview with congressional investigators.

Transcripts from dozens of such interviews were released Thursday by the House Intelligence Committee.

Farkas, who previously served as the deputy assistant secretary of Defense for Russia/Ukraine/Eurasia, said on MSNBC in 2017 that she “was urging my former colleagues, and, frankly speaking, the people on the Hill… Get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can, before President Obama leaves the administration, because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior people that left. So it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy.”

She continued to say she was concerned “the Trump folks, if they found out how we knew what we knew about their, the staff, the Trump staff’s dealing with Russians, that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we would no longer have access to that intelligence. So I became very worried, because not enough was coming out into the open, and I knew that there was more.

Yeah, but

But the tranche of transcripts from 2017-2018 House Intelligence Committee interviews showed that several top Obama officials, including Farkas, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes and former National Security Adviser Susan Rice all said they had or knew of no hard evidence of Trump-Russia collusion.

Farkas’ interview with the committee took place just a couple of months after her comments on MSNBC.

So, when they were under oath they said that this whole collusion thing was a bunch of mule fritters, unlike when they were talking to friendly media outlets. Surprise?

Of course, most of the media outlets aren’t covering the release of the transcripts and what they really show, except in a few cases where they are spinning themselves to cover for Adam Schiff and the other unhinged Democrats. Mostly, though, no coverage. CNN’s front page at 650am has zero stories on the transcripts after being balls to the wall on collusion. Nor at ABC News, CBS News, or NBC News. But, remember, they’re credentialed! They have no bias! Of course, President Trump will drag them kicking and screaming into covering it, as he always does, since he promises “more to come“.

My money is on Nancy Pelosi being the first to trot out “distraction.”

Read: Transcripts Show Obama Officials Knew There Was No Russia Collusion »

Democrat Mad Over Beaches Opening Caught At Private Beach

Well, see, this is OK, because he is one of our Betters, so he’s allowed to do things you are not supposed

Democratic congressman said opening California beaches was ‘reckless.’ Then he was seen at a private beach.

Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) ordered all California beaches and state parks to close last week. However, photos of Democratic Congressman Harley Rouda reportedly show he was at a private beach last weekend despite saying that opening the beaches was “reckless.”

“Keeping Orange County beaches open during a heat wave is reckless,” Rouda tweeted April 21. “We need leaders who will prioritize public health and make the tough calls to keep our families safe.” (snip)

“Opening beaches to thousands of Southern Californians during a weekend heat-wave without adequate social-distancing protocols was a reckless action that put the families of California’s 48th district in harm’s way,” Rouda said last Thursday.

CBS News found photos of Rouda “spending time at a private beach in Southern California” last weekend.

CBS doesn’t actually show the photo. Others do

Read: Democrat Mad Over Beaches Opening Caught At Private Beach »

If All You See…

…is an umbrella needed for too much sunshine and too much rain from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is IOTW Report, with a post on a 1996 document confirming Tara Reade told of Biden’s assault.

Read: If All You See… »

Biden Promises To Get Rid Of Due Process For Those Accused Of Sexual Misconduct In Schools

Of course, he wants due process for himself

Biden Promises to Scrap New Devos Rule on College Sexual Assault

Former Vice President Joe Biden is promising to scrap newly proposed guidelines by Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos meant to ensure that individuals being accused of sexual misconduct on college campuses receive due process.

Biden, who most notably led the Obama administration’s “It’s On Us” campaign as vice president, criticized the education secretary on Wednesday for making college campuses “less safe.” In particular, the former vice president claimed DeVos’s “new rule gives colleges a green light to ignore sexual violence and strip survivors of their rights.”

“Survivors deserve to be treated with dignity and respect, and when they step forward they should be heard, not silenced,” Biden said in a statement.

Hmmm. Nah, moving on

Under prior Obama administration guidelines, colleges were allowed to use a “preponderance of the evidence” standard when determining the guilt of those accused. Such regulations often led to lawsuits alleging the infringement of civil liberties, as many of the accused were not allowed to cross-examine witnesses.

Devos’s new regulations will allow representatives for not only victims but also the accused to call witnesses and challenge evidence. Such hearings, which will be either conducted in-person or virtually, will have to now to rely on a “clear and convincing” standard, rather than just a “preponderance of the evidence.” When investigating complaints, colleges will also have to rely on trained personnel to evaluate evidence and make final decisions.

What Biden wants to do is get rid of Due Process, as required by the US Constitution (as well as state constitutions). Guilty until proven innocent. People’s lives ruined because of accusations that often cannot be proven, that are based on regret over consensual sex, where Feminist friends talk someone into thinking they were assaults. If they really were assaulted, then the complaints need to go through the criminal justice system, not a kangaroo court at a college.

Read: Biden Promises To Get Rid Of Due Process For Those Accused Of Sexual Misconduct In Schools »

Some Warmists Pushing For A “Teal New Deal”

Why teal? And do they think this will have any more chance of passing than the Green New Deal, which Democrats refuse to vote on?

Surf and turf: Green new deal should be a ‘teal new deal’

Debates around the Green New Deal have largely centered around climate change concerns on land. But a group of scientists are calling on policymakers to include oceans in the deal.

The Green New Deal is a legislative proposal to tackle climate change and boost the economy, while also supporting equity and social justice.

“There is an opportunity to enact policy that can make meaningful change to help our country both economically and environmentally,” said San Diego State University ecologist Rebecca Lewison, one of the co-authors of a new paper on the subject. “It’s critical that oceans are part of that policy framework.”

It’s almost like this really has nothing to do with science and everything to do with Modern Socialist politics.

“Integrating Oceans into Climate Policy: Any Green New Deal Needs a Splash of Blue” was published in April in Conservation Letters. Lead authors are Lewison, whose work focuses on sustainable resource and land use, and Arielle Levine, an SDSU geographer specializing in human-environment interactions in marine and coastal systems, in collaboration with Oregon State University environmental economist Steven Dundas.

The authors recommend a policy that integrates terrestrial and ocean approaches to create a robust portfolio of climate adaptation and mitigation measures supporting communities, the environment and the economy.

And that’s why it’s teal, and it still looks like this is mostly about politics. Giving government even more power. Controlling the economy and people.

“As we come out of this pandemic, policymakers will be looking for ways to jump start the economy, and we have a unique opportunity to develop policies that promote economic development in an environmentally sustainable manner,” Levine said. “Including the oceans in Green New Deal policies will expand opportunities for sustainable economic development in both inland and coastal communities, while addressing the ongoing threat of climate change that we can’t ignore.”

Never let a good crisis go to waste, eh? They want to implement controls on shipping, fishing, anything involving the seas, along with more wind turbines in the oceans. Which is interesting, since so many liberal coastal cities invoke NIMBY )not in my backyard) when anyone tries to put them up. They will supplement power during peak hours. What provides power during the other times? They don’t want coal (me neither), nor natural gas, and are against nuclear. Solar, which they want increased, won’t do it. They want lots of high speed rail. Good luck with that.

Read: Some Warmists Pushing For A “Teal New Deal” »

Pirate's Cove