MSNBC: Seriously, The Last Thing We Need Is A COVID19 Vaccine

By William Teach December 8, 2020 – 3:00 pm

Some goalpost shifting from MSNBC’s Hayes Brown

A Covid vaccine is the last thing we need to think about right now

The good news is a given at this point: A Covid-19 vaccine is going to be available to Americans. You will eventually get it if everything stays on its current course. The bad news is that any vaccine that gets approved won’t help you personally for at least months.

It’s probably for the best that you try to forget that a vaccine has been discovered at all. At least for a while.

I repeat: You will not benefit from the vaccine directly for a good long while, because “a vaccine is approved” isn’t the same as “the pandemic is over.”

I know it’s hard to accept. I get it. We’ve been stuck in purgatory for months, unable to plan for — or even picture — the future. The pandemic has kept us unsure about when — or whether — things will ever be normal again.

With news of an imminent vaccine, the fog is starting to clear. It’s easy to make the mental leap that since things will be much better soon, the danger has abated now. As that’s not the case, it’s probably for the best that you try to forget that a vaccine has been discovered at all. At least for a while.

On one hand, this is true. Until most are vaccinated things will still be dangerous. Hey, you could get it and be asymptomatic, or, you could be one of the deaths. But, let’s be honest, the Fear Porn brokers at MSNBC, an arm of the Democratic National Committee, want to to continue living in fear, the better to control you. Remember when they were all saying things would get back to normal with a vaccine?

Even if the vaccine were ready for every man, woman and child today, the line to get vaccinated is already lengthy. Doctors and other health-care workers are predicted to receive the first doses because of their constant exposure to people who’ve tested positive for the coronavirus. Then will likely come nursing home residents, first responders, people with health risks associated with Covid-19, essential workers and on and on until you get to the rest of the population.

The better to keep you locked down and getting used to being Told What To Do by your political masters.

Estimates now indicate that there may not be enough vaccine for the general public until May or June — and that was before the news that the government may have problems ordering more from Pfizer. That hasn’t stopped people from already asking their doctors when they can get vaccinated. New York University’s Langone Hospital had to send out a text Monday saying that, essentially, its patients’ guesses were as good as its was. (snip)

And all that doesn’t mean the pandemic is over. We still need to see whether, as Fauci said, people who are immune to the virus can still spread it after being vaccinated. Which means that until you and everyone you know has had both shots, it’s probably best that you take the fact that a vaccine exists at all and lock it up in the back of your head. Instead, keep acting as though it’s still dangerous to see your friends and families as we head into the Christmas season. It’s all around for the best.

See, the idea here is to make it so Government can shut down your Christmas (but, don’t expect Government employees to forgo their holiday pay day off, you peons), and then shift the goal posts as the vaccine is coming out.

Trump should have talked to all the GOP governors and got them to declare the news business a “non-essential service”. Shut them down and see how quick they change their tune.

Read: MSNBC: Seriously, The Last Thing We Need Is A COVID19 Vaccine »

Posted in Bat Soup Virus, Wonky Media | 11 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach December 8, 2020 – 1:00 pm

…is a wonderful carbon sucking tree, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is a rare link for The Gateway Pundit, with a post on 2060 dead people votes in one county in Michigan.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 11 Comments | Trackback URL

Texas Files Suit With Supreme Court Over Election Rules In Four States

By William Teach December 8, 2020 – 10:30 am

This is a rather interesting move

Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over Election Rules

The State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday challenging the election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution.

Texas argues that these states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures. Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above.

Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors. The lawsuit says:

Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.

…

This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.

Ultimately, this will not succeed even if the suit wins, because the fix is in. There are so many irregularities with the elections, so many cheats, and the group that is supposed to be the watchdog of government, the news media, couldn’t care less, and are protecting the Democrats. If the situation was reversed, and it was quite obvious there was cheating all around for Trump, they would be investigating non-stop.

Pennsylvania’s mail in ballot changes were unconstitutional. There is no question on that. It’s black and white. It doesn’t matter if there is a COVID pandemic, we are either a nation of Law or a nation of Men. The standards for the mail-in ballots was significantly lowered. Signatures were ignored. Etc and so on, you’ve heard this all before. Unfortunately, the fix is in, and has been for quite some time. Why did we see all these changes in the swing states that Biden needed to beat Trump in, and all the irregularities? And those who are in on it are saying “what are you going to do about? Go on home, boy, you bother me. Get over it.”

Read: Texas Files Suit With Supreme Court Over Election Rules In Four States »

Posted in Democrats, Election Fraud, Joe Biden | 8 Comments | Trackback URL

Will Biden’s HHS Pick Turn Agency Into Cult of Climastrology Member?

By William Teach December 8, 2020 – 7:51 am

We aren’t quite sure what California AG Xavier Becerra, nominated to be Biden’s head of Health and Human Services pick, is planning on doing, other than making sure there are zero restrictions on abortion and strengthening the Obamacare failures. Will he do something about climate change (scam)? Warmists hope so

Will Biden’s top health nominee prescribe a better climate?

Xavier Becerra, the first Latino attorney general of California, has been a thorn in the Trump administration’s side since President Donald Trump moved into the White House nearly four years ago.

Becerra and a battalion of Democratic attorneys general have taken Trump to task over health care, immigration, and much else, but time and again Becerra singled out the environment as his issue of choice, leading challenges against the administration’s assaults on the National Environmental Policy Act, regulations limiting methane emissions from oil and gas facilities, and California’s vehicle efficiency standards, among other things. He filed more than 50 lawsuits against the Trump administration over its handling of the environment. (snip)

Once he’s done with that, Becerra could turn to an even trickier crisis: the public health effects of climate change. Last week, a major report in the medical journal The Lancet outlined the myriad ways in which rising temperatures and other consequences of climate change are worsening public health around the globe. The researchers found that heat, wildfires, infectious disease, livestock production, and other climate-related risks are straining healthcare systems already buckling under the weight of the COVID-19 pandemic. In the longer term, the report demonstrated that climate change threatens to undo the past 50 years of gains in global public health.

There’s that garbage Lancent study again.

Becerra could go beyond those recommendations. On Monday, Evergreen Action, a climate policy and advocacy group started by former presidential campaign staffers for Governor Jay Inslee of Washington, unveiled five ways the department could help mobilize a national climate change response, some of which build on parts of the Biden campaign’s platform. “Biden’s choice of Attorney General Becerra signals that HHS is prepared to prioritize climate like never before,” the group said.

Inslee’s group (let’s not forget that Inslee was the climate change candidate, and his primary campaign flamed out very, very early) says that “every federal agency must become a climate agency.” Start with doing away with all fossil fueled vehicles for employees of HHS.

Evergreen Action suggests Becerra could use the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, a federal program aimed at helping low income families with energy costs, to help states pay for renewable energy projects, energy efficiency, home electrification, and weatherization. Such a directive would help low-income Americans through the economic fallout of the pandemic, the group says, by lowering energy bills. Becerra could also tap the National Institutes of Health, the largest public funder of biomedical research in the world, to fund more research into the consequences of rising temperatures on public health. The NIH currently spends less than 2 percent of its budget on climate-related research.

I’m sure those low income families would be pretty appreciative of some weatherization, eh? Maybe getting back to work would be a bit better.

Read: Will Biden’s HHS Pick Turn Agency Into Cult of Climastrology Member? »

Posted in Democrats, Global Warming | 18 Comments | Trackback URL

California: You May No Longer Gather Socially With Your Friends, Even Outdoors

By William Teach December 8, 2020 – 7:30 am

California dictators gotta dictate

Under California’s stay-at-home order, can I gather with friends outdoors?

The answer is no, according to the state guidelines.

Previously, the state requirement for private gatherings was to keep them outdoors and small, with people from no more than three households attending. Now, if your county or region falls under the order, “all gatherings with members of other households are prohibited,” according to the state.

Here’s how Santa Clara County puts it: “You may no longer gather socially (even outdoors).”

And this is what Berkeley Health Officer Dr. Lisa Hernandez said about it: “If you have a social bubble, it is now popped.”

Does this apply to state lawmakers and bureaucrats attending fancy conferences, or the Gov dining at a fancy restaurant? Anyhow, it doesn’t sound too authoritarian, does it?

While social gatherings aren’t permitted, religious worship, protests and demonstrations are allowed but only outdoors with health protocols in place.

Just claim that every gathering is a protest.

“So this is really important to take care of your physical health, to take care of your mental health, to get the kind of exercise that is required to get us through this temporary moment,” Gov Gavin Newsome said. “This is not a permanent state. This is what many had projected. We had predicted the final surge in this pandemic. There is light at the end of the tunnel. We are a few months away from truly seeing real progress with the vaccine, real distribution, real accessibility, real availability.”

That’s what they told us in March. How’s that health when so many are out of work, losing their business, massively behind on their rent and mortgages and car payments, and more?

Many aren’t buying public officials’ ‘stay-at-home’ message. Experts say there’s a better way

….

Some 33 million Californians are now under a new regional stay-at-home order that began Sunday night, a last-ditch effort to turn the corner on an alarming rise in coronavirus cases statewide. The blunt messaging worked to bend the curve in the spring, when fear of the novel virus and the insidious ways it might spread kept many indoors. But nine months later, the words seem to have lost their meaning. (snip)

“It’s not because the public is irresponsible; it’s because they are losing trust in public health officials who put out arbitrary restrictions,” said Dr. Monica Gandhi, an infectious-disease specialist at UC San Francisco. “We are failing in our public health messaging.”

There’s definitely COVID19 fatigue. People are tired of the Dictates from government, especially with many of the government officials failing to practice what they Mandate. Mandates that don’t seem to end, ones that keep coming back. Lots of people have become lax with things like social distancing, washing hands, not touching their face, not touching other people. If wearing a mask, lots don’t bother to wear it correctly. Leaving the nose uncovered is common. It would have been a lot better early on to cajole citizens, to ask, and, quite frankly, for the GOP and Dems to work together, but, we know that the Democrats wanted to use this against President Trump. Using the authoritarian stick has created too much resistance.

Read: California: You May No Longer Gather Socially With Your Friends, Even Outdoors »

Posted in Bat Soup Virus | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

Climate Cult Students Push For Climate Change (scam) Divestments

By William Teach December 7, 2020 – 1:00 pm

When will they give up their own use of fossil fuels and make their own lives carbon neutral?

Students push for university climate change divestments

When environmentalist Bill McKibben hit the road in 2012 to preach the gospel of sustainable investing, few would have guessed that his bio-fuel-powered bus tour of US universities would spark a worldwide divestment movement.

But eight years later, the work of Mr McKibben and others has led more than 1,250 institutional investors with $14.5tn in assets to commit to cut fossil fuels from their portfolios, and inspired a new generation of activists to take the fight to companies profiting from climate change.

Their message caught on quickly with students. If the world was going to keep global warming in check, energy companies would need to leave the vast majority of their fossil fuel assets in the ground. Therefore, university endowments that held fossil fuel stocks, as Mr McKibben argued in Rolling Stone magazine, are investing in a way “that guarantees [their students] won’t have much of a planet on which to make use of their degree”. (snip)

Students have kept up the pressure and things are changing. By January 2020, more than half of the public universities in the UK had committed to divest, and both Cambridge and Oxford joined the group later in the year.

In the US, Brown University became the first Ivy League school to sign up in March 2020. Cornell University followed suit in May.

You get the idea. That said, how do these institutions of higher learning run without fossil fuels? The construction, bringing in food and supplies, all the offsite conferences, all the sports? How about heating and cooling? Remember this one from earlier in the year?

The students weren’t particularly happy with having to practice what they preach. And the professor responded further

Read More »

Read: Climate Cult Students Push For Climate Change (scam) Divestments »

Posted in Climahypocrites, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

Sports Illustrated Names The Activist Athlete Sportsperson Of The Year

By William Teach December 7, 2020 – 10:30 am

This is really great. Multimillionaires who talk a big game but don’t actually do anything, well, other than drive fans away with their politics

SI’s 2020 Sportsperson of the Year: The Activist Athlete

Lakers star LeBron James, WNBA’s Breanna Stewart, Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes, tennis champ Naomi Osaka, and former Chiefs lineman Laurent Duvernay-Tardif were named 2020 Sportspersons of the Year by Sports Illustrated (SI) for being “champions on the field, and champions for others off it.”

James, who SI called “already a contender for GOAT,” and said “there is debate over whether he’s the greatest NBA player ever,” was also given the Muhammad Ali Legacy Award by SI for putting “his considerable energy into inspiring young people to go to the ballot box in the face of voter suppression.” (snip)

Taylor, a forward for the Seattle Storm, “spoke loudly against racism and for women’s equality,” according to SI. “Her support of Black Lives Matter never wavered, from the season’s opening tip to the Storm’s title celebration.”

Super Bowl MVP Mahomes “used his platform as the NFL’s transcendent star to push the league to recognize the Black Lives Matter movement and players’ rights to protest,” according to SI.

SI said that Osaka “embraced her fame and found her voice in the fight against social injustice,” and that Super Bowl champion Duvernay-Tardif “left the NFL to join the front lines of the battle against COVID-19.”

The publication said they will provide more of the athlete’s stories in detail on Monday.

How much of their own money are they giving to the causes? How much of their own time is being spent going out and actually helping? It’s really easy to write some words on Instagram and such, it’s a lot hard to get out there, and, say, spend time in the poor, crime ridden, poorly educated black neighborhoods as they were set up by the Democratic Party, attempting to get kids to move forward.

But, hey, if they want to call people who drive sports fans away from sports, have at it.

Read: Sports Illustrated Names The Activist Athlete Sportsperson Of The Year »

Posted in Sports, Unhinged Tools | 8 Comments | Trackback URL

Bummer: Snowy UK Winters For Children Could Maybe Possibly Become A Thing Of The Past

By William Teach December 7, 2020 – 7:15 am

Remember back to 2000 when The Independent, another UK news outlet, declared that snow was a thing of the past and that “Children just aren’t going to know what snow is”. Well, of course that prognostication didn’t materialize, so The Independent memory holed it, but, it led to lots of meme and derision. Now, the BBC gives it a shot

Climate change: Snowy UK winters could become thing of the past

Snowy winters could become a thing of the past as climate change affects the UK, Met Office analysis suggests.

It is one of a series of projections about how UK’s climate could change, shared with BBC Panorama.

It suggests by the 2040s most of southern England could no longer see sub-zero days. By the 2060s only high ground and northern Scotland are still likely to experience such cold days.

The projections are based on global emissions accelerating.

It could mean the end of sledging, snowmen and snowball fights, says Dr Lizzie Kendon, a senior Met Office scientist who worked on the climate projections.

“We’re saying by the end of the century much of the lying snow will have disappeared entirely except over the highest ground,” she told Panorama.

Oh, good, projections of doom 20, 40, and 80 years out. What happens when they fail to pan out? Right, nothing, because no one will remember these cult prognostications. The idea is to scare people now to get them to give up their money, freedom, liberty, and choice. Hey, I wonder if the people in the news broadcasting this garbage ever considered that the Government control will effect them, too?

And, yes, the above picture was part of the article.

Read: Bummer: Snowy UK Winters For Children Could Maybe Possibly Become A Thing Of The Past »

Posted in AGW Scaremongering, Global Warming | 10 Comments | Trackback URL

Follow The Science: China Joe Picks California AG For HHS Head

By William Teach December 7, 2020 – 6:51 am

If one were going to follow the science, one would think that someone with a background in health services might be picked to be head of Health and Human Services, someone who knows how healthcare works. Instead

President-elect Joe Biden picks California AG Xavier Becerra to lead HHS amid global coronavirus pandemic

President-elect Joe Biden will nominate California Attorney General Xavier Becerra to lead the health and human services department, a critical appointment amid a global pandemic that has killed more than 280,000 in the U.S. alone.

Separately, Biden picked a Harvard infectious disease expert, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, to replace Dr. Robert Redfield as head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

If confirmed by the Senate, Becerra, 62, will be the first Latino to head the Department of Health and Human Services, a $1-trillion-plus agency with 80,000 employees and a portfolio that includes drugs and vaccines, leading-edge medical research and health insurance programs covering more than 130 million Americans.

Becerra’s nomination, which was first reported by The New York Times and confirmed by The Associated Press, as Health and Human Services secretary comes as Biden has faced increasing pressure to add more diversity to his administration.

Becerra has a BA in economics from and then earned his law degree, both at Stanford. After working a few years as a lawyer, he’s spent the majority of his time working for politicians and as a politician. As AG of California, he’s gone after whistleblowers and journalists. Sure, Trump’s head of HHS, Alex Azar, doesn’t have a degree in anything health related, either, but, at least he’s spent time working previously at HHS. Yet, we are continuously told that Joe Biden will follow the science, which apparently means lawsuits and government restrictions on The People.

Congressional Hispanic Caucus Chairman Joaquin Castro lauded the former congressman’s selection in a statement Sunday.

“In this moment of crisis with COVID-19 devastating Latino communities, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus is proud that California’s Attorney General Xavier Becerra, a dedicated public servant, will be nominated by President-Elect Biden to lead to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,” the statement said.

Apparently, his one attribution is that he’s Hispanic, because identity politics is more important.

Read: Follow The Science: China Joe Picks California AG For HHS Head »

Posted in Bat Soup Virus, Joe Biden | Comments Off on Follow The Science: China Joe Picks California AG For HHS Head | Trackback URL

Climate Cult Still Wants To Take Advantage Of COVID19 Misery To Push Their “Solutions”

By William Teach December 6, 2020 – 5:23 pm

Nothing says “we care, we really do!” like taking advantage of people’s misery, fear, sickness, and death

COVID-19 recovery is an opportunity to tackle worsening climate crisis: New report

We are at a moment of overlapping planetary health emergencies: COVID-19 and climate change. Both have their origins at the intersection of humanity and the rest of the natural world, both exacerbate pre-existing health inequities and both have the ability to bring health systems and economies to their knees.

The health impacts of COVID-19 are well-known — those of climate change less so. A new report by the Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change, an international collaboration among 38 leading academic institutions and U.N. agencies, shows that as the globe warms humans are experiencing increasing heat emergencies, wildfires, severe weather, trouble with food yields and potential for novel infectious diseases.

Watts Up With That? beats up on the horrendous report, and, let’s not forget that The Lancet went for a hard left turn back during the Iraq War, publishing an easily debunked statistical study in 2006 claiming there were over 655,000 Iraqi deaths since the start of the war, a really big shoddy piece of “science” which was nevertheless broadcast by the Credentialed Media as Holy Writ.

We need to “multisolve” — manage COVID-19 and climate change at the same time, looking for the sweet spots where a single measure can deliver the triple-win of improving public health, contributing to a sustainable economy and reducing the drivers of future crises.

I wonder how they intend to do this? They nip around the edges, but, never really answer

With climate set to drive further health-related emergencies as well as economic crises a shift from a culture of efficiency to one of resiliency is required. We could decrease our healthcare-related footprint and reduce the risk of supply disruption by switching to reusable medical supplies such as gowns and blood pressure cuffs.

You getting healthcare is also bad for the climate (another crappy Lancent study). It would be so much easier if billions of you would just die, right?

The proposed national formulary, a good first step towards a pharmacare system, can also serve as a list of essential medicines considered for domestic production. Co-ordinated work between the public and the private sector, potentially including the creation of new crown corporations, could help ensure supply of critical items, as it did during the Second World War.

Hmm, so, government in charge, eh? Wouldn’t you feel great if government was in charge of your medicines? And I bet you feel great about using a global pandemic to push a cult, right?

Read: Climate Cult Still Wants To Take Advantage Of COVID19 Misery To Push Their “Solutions” »

Posted in AGW Scaremongering, AGW Socialism, Bat Soup Virus, Global Warming | 4 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove