USA Today Wants Supreme Court To Strike Down Qualified Immunity For Police

By William Teach October 1, 2021 – 10:30 am

I wonder if the editorial board of the USA Today realizes that if SCOTUS kills off qualified immunity for police they would be doing the same for politicians and government employees? Nah. This is really about some cop hatred

Not above the law: Supreme Court can protect citizens by striking down qualified immunity

Even before bipartisan Senate negotiations on advancing the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act recently broke down after months of negotiations, a key reform of police accountability was off the table: qualified immunity.

The judge-invented notion protects police officers from civil suits even if they violate someone’s constitutional rights, unless those rights have been upheld by the relevant federal appeals court in a similar case.

Reform of qualified immunity is key to holding police officers responsible for misdeeds on the job. Cops can kill, rape and steal and never face accountability in civil court as long as the Supreme Court continues to enforce this misguided legal doctrine.

Actually, that is not correct. They can face criminal and civil penalties for certain misconduct that is not covered. But, the editorial board doesn’t want you to know that.

Fortunately, the court has several cases before the justices that offer the chance to reshape qualified immunity or to abolish it and related rulings that give federal officers even stronger protection from civil suits.

Among those waiting for the Supreme Court to decide whether to hear arguments are:

The piece gives a few examples of some misconduct, conveniently forgetting that the vast majority of officers are good people who do not do wrong, but, will be accused and sued personally for bullshit of QI is removed. How many hate hoaxes do we see? How many people are accused of misconduct that never occurred, which destroys their life? Some gets pulled over, given a ticket, and then will get accused of racism or sexual misconduct or something.

The Supreme Court should take these opportunities to overrule its misguided decisions that shield police officers from lawsuits when they violate citizens’ constitutional rights.

No one, especially the police, should be immune from accountability when they harm another person.

Well, that’s interesting, because papers like the USA Today hide behind their 1st Amendment shield when they’ve done wrong. And a major national newspaper can ruin someone in a heartbeat, and, even if that person manages to win their case, it’s too late. And, the editorial board forgets to make a case as to why the Supreme Court should kill off QI. Not one shred of Constitutional qualification. Zip. Nothing. And, they’re trying to say that QI is a creation of the court. Nope

(NCSL) The doctrine of qualified immunity protects state and local officials, including law enforcement officers, from individual liability unless the official violated a clearly established constitutional right.

The evolution of qualified immunity began in 1871 when Congress adopted 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which makes government employees and officials personally liable for money damages if they violate a person’s federal constitutional rights. State and local police officers may be sued under § 1983. Until the 1960s, few § 1983 lawsuits were successfully brought. In 1967, the Supreme Court recognized qualified immunity as a defense to § 1983 claims. In 1982, the Supreme Court adopted the current test for the doctrine. Qualified immunity is generally available if the law a government official violated isn’t “clearly established.”

Created by Congress. And, officers can be sued. It’s just difficult. Same with government employees. Even harder with elected officials. Why do groups like the USAEB always forget about those latter ones? If you do something dumb at your business, the business can be sued. It would be tough to go after you personally. Most states have their own laws about QI. Which means SCOTUS cannot rule them unconstitutional, especially when there is no argument that QI is unconstitutional.

This is all about cop hatred, though. Which is rather gauche, and so 2020’s.

Read: USA Today Wants Supreme Court To Strike Down Qualified Immunity For Police »

Posted in Unhinged Tools | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

Hotcold Take: Politicians Can Raise The Birth Rate By Passing ‘Climate Change’ Legislation

By William Teach October 1, 2021 – 7:00 am

The ravings of a cult. This is what you get, blithering idiocy. Things that no one was thinking about turned into big productions, all based on the notion of more Progressive (nice Fascism) government

If Politicians Want to Raise Birth Rates, They Should Pass Climate Policy

Because of the climate crisis, other young people often ask Luisa Neubauer whether she would choose to bring children into the world. The fact that people are even asking this question, 25-year-old Neubauer said at a recent online panel, is “a tragic moment for humanity. I don’t think there yet exists in English a word to express how dramatic that is.” Neubauer, who founded Germany’s chapter of the global climate youth movement Fridays for Future, has a point: Surely, it’s a fairly monumental development when a species starts rethinking its most basic instinct to procreate.

It is tragic, because so many youngsters have been indoctrinated into a doomsday cult, and the people who should be doing interventions are actually the ones helping propagate the cult doctrine.

Once upon a time, environmentalists might have cheered falling birth rates. After all, babies born in wealthy countries, particularly, have a large carbon footprint. (Even though they look so innocent! It’s like the Christian doctrine of original sin.) Labeling procreation an ecologically destructive consumer choice—like buying an SUV—has at points been a staple of liberal guilt-tripping over climate.

There is that, because the same cult also pushes for lower numbers of humans and population control, and some of their more extreme even want population reduction (usually involving reducing the number of icky black and brown people in 3rd world countries, because the climate cult is rather racist and bigoted, preaching from their 1st World perches)

It’s not the first time in history that people have questioned the wisdom of bringing children into a screwed-up world. But this moment is unusual: People don’t usually forgo reproduction en masse out of apocalyptic fear. There is no evidence that Cold War anxieties around nuclear war shaped Americans’ family planning, for example.

One reason today is different is that although the idea of nuclear war was undeniably scary, it was only a possibility. Climate disaster, on the other hand, is a current reality with a grim trajectory: A study published in Nature this week found that if the planet keeps warming at its current pace, a child who was six years old in 2020 will live through 36 times more heat waves, twice as many wildfires, three times more river floods, and twice as many droughts as an adult born in 1960, all increasing the risk of crop failures, as well.

Sherman Potter Bull Cookies

The political implications and potential of the birth rate is a touchy subject, because we’re used to framing reproduction as a personal choice (except for the far right, which is happy to let the government force people in Texas into child-rearing labor). And low birth rates aren’t only a sign of anxiety and pessimism about the future, or poor social supports; when women are more educated and have more career options, they tend to have fewer kids. Having no children—or fewer than your foremothers—can be a sound life choice. But when almost two in five young people say they may not have children of their own because of the climate crisis, that’s not progress. It’s a sign of pain and distress—and a call for help. It may not move congressional Republicans and moderate Democrats into investing in sound climate policy this month—but it should.

It’s a cult. And it’s better if these people do not have children, so as to not infect their children with doomsday cult beliefs.

Read: Hotcold Take: Politicians Can Raise The Birth Rate By Passing ‘Climate Change’ Legislation »

Posted in AGW Socialism, Democrats, Global Warming | Comments Off on Hotcold Take: Politicians Can Raise The Birth Rate By Passing ‘Climate Change’ Legislation | Trackback URL

Democrats Want Americans Tested And Mandated, Against Testing Illegals

By William Teach October 1, 2021 – 6:49 am

This is the type of vote that needs to be brought up by Republicans next year for the mid-terms: what should have been something simple and commonsense had the Democrats blocking it

House Democrats Block COVID Testing Mandate for Illegal Immigrants

On Wednesday afternoon Representative Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA) attempted to bring her REACT Act — which would require a negative Wuhan coronavirus test for any illegal immigrant before they are released from custody — to the House floor for consideration, but 217 Democrats voted to block consideration of the proposal.

“Today, I offered my REACT Act on the House floor, which would require DHS to give a COVID test to everyone crossing our border illegally,” Miller-Meeks Tweeted. “The majority chose to block this commonsense bill that would ensure the health and safety of border patrol and border communities.”

Speaking on the House floor about her bill, Miller-Meeks noted “I have traveled to the U.S.-Mexico border twice this year. On both trips, I spoke with the brave men and women serving in Customs and Border Protection and also the physicians that are stationed there. I saw firsthand the crisis they are facing. I believe that it is our congressional responsibility to address this and support our officers,” she added.

Miller-Meeks first introduced the REACT Act in March of this year, but House Democrats blocked it then, too. Since its introduction, more than 950,000 illegal immigrants crossed America’s southern border, yet Democrats in the House nor President Joe Biden will admit the gravity of their border crisis or its impact on the health and safety of Americans.

This is something that Customs and Border Control, along with other agencies and officials, have asked for. They cannot do it without federal authorization. What is so controversial about this? Why are Democrats blocking it? There should be no politics about it. Why do Democrats not want them tested? What would it hurt? Perhaps they do not want data about how many are coming across with COVID?

The Democrats’ double standard on Wuhan coronavirus prevention protocol could not be more obvious. As Democrats on Capitol Hill and in the Biden administration roll out vaccine mandates for foreign travelers who come to the country legally and require tens of millions of Americans who work for the government or private companies to get vaccinated, they somehow turn a blind eye to the public health crisis brewing amid the illegal immigration crisis along our southern border.

Let’s not forget, Surrender Joe came out with an order, one which is not fully formed yet, to require visitors from other nations to have had the COVID vaccine, and even Americans returning to the country need negative tests. Biden is going to attempt to force companies with 100+ employees to be vaccinated. He’s forcing all federal employees, including the Border Patrol, to be vaccinated. Yet, the people they’re dealing with do not even have to take a test? Where’s the Science in this?

They want to blast Red states like Florida and Texas for not requiring masks and having lower vaccination rates, yet, let illegals not even get a test.

Read: Democrats Want Americans Tested And Mandated, Against Testing Illegals »

Posted in Bat Soup Virus, Democrats, Illegal Immigration | Comments Off on Democrats Want Americans Tested And Mandated, Against Testing Illegals | Trackback URL

We’re Saved: Spain Trots Out “Drowning Girl” Sculpture

By William Teach September 30, 2021 – 3:00 pm

We’re still on the spreading awareness and scaremongering, rather than Warmists practicing what they preach

A dramatic new sculpture of a drowning girl in a Spanish river hints at a dark future. It’s titled, ‘Tomorrow.’

On Spain’s northern coast, residents awoke to a shocking sight last week. The head of a young girl was nearly submerged in Bilbao’s Nervion River as the water rose, covering her mouth, nose, and eyes.

The fiberglass sculpture is the work of Mexican hyperrealist artist Ruben Orozco Loza. It’s titled “Bihar,” meaning “Tomorrow” in Basque, the language spoken in the region.

“At first it gave me a feeling of stress, when more of the face was out of the water, but now to me she communicates sadness, a lot of sadness,” Triana Gil, a visitor viewing the sculpture, told Reuters on Tuesday. “She doesn’t even look worried, it’s as if she is letting herself drown.”

Loza does not explicitly say that the “Bihar” refers to climate change — in an email to Insider, he described the piece as a reflection on the decisions we make for future generations more broadly. But it’s hard not to make the connection. The latest report from the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found that from 1901 to 2018, the world’s seas rose by half a foot on average, and the annual rate of sea-level rise nearly tripled.

If the seas rose half a foot, that is on the lower end of average for the Holocene era, when it should be double to triple that during a warm period.

It took Loza three months to complete the artwork, which he designed and crafted in Mexico with the help of his wife. He then flew it to Bilbao in eight parts, where it was later assembled and brought to the river by boat. A steel structure keeps the 3.5-ton girl submerged, Loza explained.

Hmm, they flew it on a fossil fueled jet?

The survey, which was released by the journal Nature this month but has not yet been peer reviewed, also found that 57% of respondents described climate change as making them feel “powerless.” Another 30% said it made them feel “indifferent.” That’s where Loza’s piece might come in.

“Art leaves no one indifferent. That’s its function,” he said.

You know what’s not indifferent? Data. The closest station to Bilboa, which is on the northern part of Spain at it’s most eastern point, is Santander

La Coruna, also on the north coast of Spain, is similar. Vigo, way down but still on the Atlantic, is similar. All the stations in the Mediterranean are similar. Average rise, no acceleration. So, where does the drowning come into play? Oh, right, doomsday cult.

Read: We’re Saved: Spain Trots Out “Drowning Girl” Sculpture »

Posted in AGW Scaremongering, Collapsing Science, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach September 30, 2021 – 1:00 pm

…is an Evil fossil fueled vehicle, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is 357 Magnum, with a post on Aussies giving up their guns leading to the end of liberty.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

Ohio Bill Would Make It Easier For Employees To Claim Exemptions To COVID Mandates

By William Teach September 30, 2021 – 10:30 am

This bill takes the middle road

Ohio House bill would expand COVID-19 vaccine mandate exemptions

A new bill that aims to ban employers from requiring workers to get the COVID-19 vaccine is being considered by lawmakers in Ohio.

H.B. 435, also called the “Ohio COVID-19 Fairness Act,” aims to make it easier for people who do not want to get the COVID-19 vaccine to avoid getting one. The bill says public and private employers cannot require it’s employees to get a COVID-19 vaccine that has not received full federal approval.

“Though Pfizer’s vaccine has FDA approval for adults, the bill would allow exemptions for medical reasons, natural immunity defined as “presence of COVID-19 antibodies in an amount at least equal to those conferred by a COVID-19 vaccine,” and religious beliefs.

The exemptions would not apply to people who work in children’s hospitals, intensive care or critical care units or people who start a job after the bill goes into effect.

“Some people want to take away an employer’s right to dictate how people act in the workplace. Others feel like it’s that businesses prerogative like they want you to wear a suit to work,” said Thaddeus Hoffmeister, a law professor at the University of Dayton.

The bill doesn’t ban employers from mandating, as the article makes it seem, it makes sure that people can be exempt for medical and religious reasons, as well as having natural immunity due to having the antibodies from having had COVID, something forgotten so much with all the vaccine mandates. One big component is the religious exemption

In other words, Citizens do not have to jump through hoops to make the claim. And, this seems aimed more at government institutions than private businesses, because Government can be overbearing

Carfagna said the same exemptions apply for students at K-12 schools, public higher education institutions, and private higher education institutions. But they would not apply at children’s hospitals, or for those who work in ICU or critical care.

Only the Pfizer vaccine can be mandated under the bill, since it has full FDA approval and the Moderna and J&J shots are still under emergency use. The exemptions don’t apply at people who work children’s hospitals, or for those who work in ICU or critical care. That’s similar to a law that takes effect October 13 blocking schools and universities from requiring COVID vaccines that don’t have full FDA approval.

The bill also bans proof of vaccinations to come into state buildings or agencies, but allows businesses to use those so-called vaccine passports. The law would expire in June of 2023.

The bill was referred back to committee rather than being voted on, so, we’ll see what happens with it.

Read: Ohio Bill Would Make It Easier For Employees To Claim Exemptions To COVID Mandates »

Posted in Bat Soup Virus | 12 Comments | Trackback URL

Warmist George Monbiot Says All Growth, Including Green Growth, Has To Go

By William Teach September 30, 2021 – 8:33 am

It’s funny, because myself and other Skeptics were saying well over a decade ago that one of the things the hardcore Warmists were advocating was a massive reduction in economic activity, turning the clock back to centuries ago, and people said we were nuts. Yet, climate cultists keep telling us they want to do just that

‘Green growth’ doesn’t exist – less of everything is the only way to avert catastrophe

There is a box labelled “climate”, in which politicians discuss the climate crisis. There is a box named “biodiversity”, in which they discuss the biodiversity crisis. There are other boxes, such as pollution, deforestation, overfishing and soil loss, gathering dust in our planet’s lost property department. But they all contain aspects of one crisis that we have divided up to make it comprehensible. The categories the human brain creates to make sense of its surroundings are not, as Immanuel Kant observed, the “thing-in-itself”. They describe artefacts of our perceptions rather than the world.

Nature recognises no such divisions. As Earth systems are assaulted by everything at once, each source of stress compounds the others. (snip through all the yammering about things that are Man’s fault, but, are environmental things, not ‘climate change’)

When we box up this predicament, our efforts to solve one aspect of the crisis exacerbate another. For example, if we were to build sufficient direct air capture machines to make a major difference to atmospheric carbon concentrations, this would demand a massive new wave of mining and processing for the steel and concrete. The impact of such construction pulses travels around the world. To take just one component, the mining of sand to make concrete is trashing hundreds of precious habitats. It’s especially devastating to rivers, whose sand is highly sought in construction. Rivers are already being hit by drought, the disappearance of mountain ice and snow, our extraction of water, and pollution from farming, sewage and industry. Sand dredging, on top of these assaults, could be a final, fatal blow.

Or look at the materials required for the electronics revolution that will, apparently, save us from climate breakdown. Already, mining and processing the minerals required for magnets and batteries is laying waste to habitats and causing new pollution crises. Now, as Jonathan Watts’s terrifying article in the Guardian this week shows, companies are using the climate crisis as justification for extracting minerals from the deep ocean floor, long before we have any idea of what the impacts might be.

So, the “green” economy will trash the environment.

Everywhere, governments seek to ramp up the economic load, talking of “unleashing our potential” and “supercharging our economy”. Boris Johnson insists that “a global recovery from the pandemic must be rooted in green growth”. But there is no such thing as green growth. Growth is wiping the green from the Earth.

We have no hope of emerging from this full-spectrum crisis unless we dramatically reduce economic activity. Wealth must be distributed – a constrained world cannot afford the rich – but it must also be reduced. Sustaining our life-support systems means doing less of almost everything. But this notion – that should be central to a new, environmental ethics – is secular blasphemy.

Cool, a doubleshot of killing off economic activity and Modern Socialist redistribution of Other People’s wealth. He is right one one thing: all these “green” technologies and such are rather bad for the actual environment, a real issue, while meant to solve the fake issue of ‘climate change.’

Read: Warmist George Monbiot Says All Growth, Including Green Growth, Has To Go »

Posted in AGW Socialism, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

China Joe Admin Prepares For Massive Border Surge If COVID Restriction Lifted

By William Teach September 30, 2021 – 8:10 am

The number of people showing up at the border is already massive, highest in 21 years. These people know that Democrats will do all they can to make them American citizens and Democratic Party voters for free. That they don’t have to do anything but show up. And now

U.S. officials think massive surge at southern border possible if Covid restriction is lifted Thursday

illegal alien DemocratU.S. officials are quietly preparing for what they think could be the biggest surge in traffic at the southern border in decades if a Covid restriction that has blocked most migrants for almost two years is lifted Thursday.

On a call this week with senior Department of Homeland Security officials, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas asked whether the department was prepared for a worst-case scenario in which 350,000 to 400,000 migrants cross the border in October, according to two DHS officials familiar with the conversation.

A number that high would nearly double the 21-year record reached in July, when more than 210,000 migrants crossed the border.

The two DHS officials stressed that the estimate is not based on internal intelligence or calculations, saying it is meant to prepare the agency for what could be an overwhelming number of migrants who cross if a court order that lifts the Covid restriction, known as Title 42, takes effect at the end of the week, as is possible.

U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled Sept. 16 that use of Title 42, a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention authority implemented by the Trump administration to mitigate the spread of Covid-19 in March 2020, did not give the Biden administration the authority to block asylum-seekers from crossing the U.S.-Mexico border.

Interestingly, it didn’t stop US officials from blocking the movement of Americans. Also, the Biden admin was mostly using that Title 42 to stop the Haitians, not other border crossers. And, really, all of the border crossers are claiming asylum, despite less than 10% being qualified.

Under Title 42, the Trump administration blocked most asylum-seekers from entering the U.S. and turned them back into Mexico, regardless of their nationalities.

The Biden administration lifted the policy for children who arrived unaccompanied, but it kept it for families and single adults.

In recent months, however, the majority of families and some single adults have been allowed to stay to claim asylum simply because Mexico lacked the capacity to take them back.

Stop enticing them to come. That would be a start, right? But, that cat is already out of the bag, based on decades of Democrats talking about amnesty. If you have to, build big tent cities with big fences and hold them till they get their asylum hearing, then kick them out. Rather than release them with a wink-wink promise to return, especially when so many are sick

Mayorkas: 1-in-5 Border Crossers Arrive to U.S. Sick with Illnesses

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas says about 1-in-5 border crossers arriving at the United States-Mexico border are sick with illnesses.

During remarks at Georgetown University this week, Mayorkas revealed the extent to which federal immigration officials are encountering sick border crossers who are carrying viruses and diseases.

“We are confronted with a population of people that, as a general matter, that have a rate of illness of approximately 20 percent,” Mayorkas said, according to the Daily Mail.

He wasn’t particularly clear whether he was talking specifically about COVID, or with other diseases such as measles, varicella, mumps, tuberculosis, and others, but, the context of the discussion seemed to be about COVID.

Anyhow, this surge should work out well

Border Patrol agents must be vaccinated by Nov or face being fired: Whistleblower

U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents have been put on official notice by the Biden administration that they must be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 by Nov. 1 or face being fired, according to a whistleblower who sounded the alarm to House Judiciary Committee ranking member Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio.

“The people who have been busting their tails, enforcing our law, doing their job on the border – they’re gonna get fired if they don’t take the vaccine,” Jordan told Fox News’ Laura Ingraham.

Jordan pointed out that migrants entering the U.S. illegally are given the choice as to whether or not to be vaccinated against the coronavirus, saying of the double standard, “That is how ridiculous the Biden administration has become.”

Well, perhaps we could give the illegals non-citizen status if they’ll work all those food industry and other low pay jobs that aren’t being worked now?

Read: China Joe Admin Prepares For Massive Border Surge If COVID Restriction Lifted »

Posted in Bat Soup Virus, Illegal Immigration, Joe Biden | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

Bummer: China Joe Climate (scam) Agenda Hangs In Balance

By William Teach September 29, 2021 – 3:04 pm

Perhaps Surrender Joe could simply put the climate scam stuff in another bill, vote for it on it’s own merits, rather than sticking it in a massive, highly partisan piece of legislation that even has a few Democrats bowing out? Perhaps Joe, his people, and the elected Democrats could show the way and practice what they preach?

Biden’s climate change agenda hangs in balance as Congress debates budget

If Congress passes President Biden’s ambitious plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, he will go down in history as the nation’s first leader to usher in a transformative climate change agenda. But with the scope of the federal budget in limbo, should those measures be cut from the final package, the U.S. will, once again, come up short on helping to avert climate change catastrophe, according to environmentalists.

“The urgency couldn’t be greater,” Matthew H. Davis, senior director of government affairs at the League of Conservation Voters, told Yahoo News. “We need to get our emissions cuts on track to go down by 50 percent by the end of this decade or we will see more summers like this one, in which 1 in 3 Americans experienced a climate-related natural disaster.”

No one is stopping you or the rest of the Warmists. Have at it. Give up your own use of fossil fuels and all the other stuff. If it does pass, Joe will go down in history as the president who cratered the economy, destroyed the energy sector, instituted the biggest increase in federal government power in over a decade, and possibly split apart the Union. Because Republican states will not comply.

While its ultimate fate is unclear, the president’s Build Back Better agenda contains a variety of measures to limit greenhouse gas emissions and move the national economy away from a reliance on fossil fuels. The most significant, in terms of limiting climate change, include the clean electricity performance program, which would reward utility companies for shifting rapidly to renewable energy sources such as solar and wind and penalize them for failing to do so. It would also incentivize the purchase of electric vehicles, put a fee on leaking methane in oil and gas production and give tax breaks for boosting clean electricity production. Failure to sign on to any of those options would likely cause the U.S. to fall short of Biden’s emissions reduction target, according to modeling by a coalition of environmental advocacy organizations and think tanks.

Biden’s goals. Not the goals of the citizens. Let him do something in his own life. He could have taken the train from D.C. to NYC to attend the United Nations meeting, but, instead, took a fossil fueled jumbo jet then flew back, and that trip included a backup jet, multiple fighter jets, helicopter rides, and huge convoys of fossil fueled vehicles, along with a jet which brought his fossil fueled limo.

“Low-cost clean energy and American-made electric cars and trucks are coming off the assembly line,” said Rep. Kathy Castor, D-Fla., who chairs the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis.

How many members of Congress drive one, and have sold all their fossil fueled vehicles?

In theory, not every policy to address climate change needs to be crammed into a budget bill. However, because congressional Republicans won’t provide any votes for climate action and Senate Republicans now filibuster every significant bill they don’t support, efforts to transition the nation to renewable energy can realistically pass only as part of the budget reconciliation process, in which Democrats can legislate with a simple majority.

It must not be a very popular agenda if they cannot pass this stuff on its own, eh? It’s supposed to be very hard to pass big legislation.

“The Biden-Harris administration and Congress are lining up to do something transformational on climate change,” Davis said. “We believe that negotiations have been positive in the past few days, and we look forward to continuing to highlight for members of Congress and members of the Biden-Harris administration just how important these policies are and just how much the public supports them.”

Transformation is supposed to be extremely hard, and what the Constitution is set up to avoid at a federal level.

Read: Bummer: China Joe Climate (scam) Agenda Hangs In Balance »

Posted in AGW Socialism, Climahypocrites, Global Warming, Joe Biden | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach September 29, 2021 – 1:00 pm

…is an evil can of a carbonated beverage causing the seas to rise, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Free North Carolina, with a post on the threat of China invading Taiwan.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 1 Comment | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove