If All You See…

…is an awesome Gaia compliant bike which could make the seas stop rising, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Daley Gator, with the anti-Obama picture of the day.

Read: If All You See… »

“New” Obama Ad: “It’s a scary time to be a woman”

Apparently, “it’s a scary time to be a woman” because Romney might want to reduce the amounts of abortions because some people are irresponsible when having sex

The Washington Post’s Rachel Weiner calls this a new add, though I’ve seen it run a few times here in North Carolina. I even mentioned this in a tweet a few weeks back.

“I’ve never felt this way before, but it’s a scary time to be a woman,” says 30-something “Jenni.” “Mitt Romney is just so out of touch.”

A female narrator chimes in: “Romney opposes requiring insurance coverage for contraception and Romney supports overturning Roe vs. Wade. Romney backed a bill that outlawed all abortion, even in cases of rape and incest.”

I wonder if Jenni is related to Julia, who was able to have irresponsible sex paid for by other people?

Politifact rates the abortion claim as “Pants on Fire,” noting that Romney does support exceptions for rape and incest in abortion bans. He has endorsed a constitutional amendment that declares that life begins at conception, and fetuses must be protected accordingly. However, recent versions of that amendment allow for abortions in cases of rape or incest. Other “human life” legislation makes no such exceptions.

Politifact really rates the video as “pants on fire.” Team Obama must be pretty darned desperate to fire up their infanticide and free contraception base if they are actually mentioning the “a” word.

Read: “New” Obama Ad: “It’s a scary time to be a woman” »

Business Owners Not Big Fans Of Obama

Is it any wonder? Obama trots out his “you didn’t build that” quote and has been trying to saddle them with higher taxes, as well as being largely dismissive of the private sector economy (via The Lonely Conservative and Hot Air)

(Gallup) U.S. business owners’ approval of President Barack Obama fell in the second quarter of 2012 to 35%, essentially tying farmers and fishers for the lowest approval among major occupational groups. Overall, professional workers remain the most approving, at 52%. …

Obama’s job approval ratings by occupational group clearly relate to election preferences. Gallup previously found that Obama does best compared with likely Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney among voters who are professionals and service workers. Romney does best among voters who work in farming and fishing or construction, or are business owners.

In the overall average for the second quarter of 2012, 47% of working Americans approved of the job Obama is doing as president, and 47% disapproved. This is slightly improved from 45% approval and 48% disapproval in the first quarter.

On one hand, Obama is doing a tiny bit better overall, but, clearly it is not because of Obama doing anything himself (he didn’t build that), but having a stable Republican controlled House keeping the economy from falling off the cliff.

59% of business owners disapprove of Obama. In fact, out of 11 categories, Obama gets negative ratings in 8 of them.

Read: Business Owners Not Big Fans Of Obama »

Democrat Senate Passes Tax Bill To Stick It To Job Creators

Interestingly, if they really cared about the middle class, they’d call for a reduction in taxes on those making less than $200k individual/$250 joint

(Washington Post) The Senate on Wednesday narrowly approved a plan to preserve tax cuts for the middle class while letting them expire for the wealthy, a powerful if largely symbolic victory for Democrats who have been pushing to raise taxes on the rich for more than a decade.

The measure is dead on arrival in the Republican-controlled House, where leaders are preparing to vote next week on their own plan to extend the George W. Bush-era tax cuts for households at every income level through 2013.

The vote was symbolic, because all tax measures must originate in the House. But, the vote shows that Democrats are willing to raise taxes on small business owners in the middle of terrible economic conditions, an increase that is comparable to spit in a large bucket of federal spending.

Vice President Biden presided over the late-afternoon vote, though with only 99 senators present, there was never much chance that he would be called upon to break a tie. His appearance highlighted the importance of the issue for President Obama, who has made tax “fairness” a centerpiece of his reelection campaign against GOP challenger Mitt Romney.

If Team Obama really wanted tax fairness, they’d ask that the tax laws be changed so that 50% of US taxpayers would no longer be paying effectively a 0% tax rate.

This is all the typical class warfare from the Democrat Party, even as Obama attends numerous $30K+ fundraisers. Perhaps he should ask those rich folks to pay their fair share directly to the federal treasury rather than the Obama re-election fund.

Read: Democrat Senate Passes Tax Bill To Stick It To Job Creators »

Obama Brings Up Gun Control, Wants Others To Do The Work

We’ve learned many things about (NMP) Obama during his 3 1/2 years in office: one of them is that he loves to make pronouncements about something needing to be done, but he’s rarely willing to do the hard work himself, instead, outsourcing the job to others, whether they want to or not. Obviously, doing the work would interfere with his campaign, vacation, and golf time, plus, it’s good to be the king and not have to lift a finger to actually lead. He does the same thing as he discusses gun control

(Politico) President Obama touched the sensitive issue of guns here on Wednesday, pivoting off last week’s Colorado movie theater shootings to call for a “consensus around violence reduction” in the country.

With the last public event of a four-day trip that started with a visit to the Aurora, Colo., hospital where almost two dozen victims were brought after the shootings, Obama said he supports measures to conduct background checks to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, fugitives and the mentally ill.

Criminals and fugitives tend not to care about the law. That’s why they’re “criminals” and “fugitives”.

“I – like most Americans – believe that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual the right to bear arms,” Obama said. “I think we recognize the traditions of gun ownership passed on from generation to generation, that hunting and shooting are part of a cherished national heritage.

Interesting that he leaves out gun ownership for protection.

“But I also believe that a lot of gun owners would agree that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers and not in the hands of crooks. They belong on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities,” he added.

Some might disagree, like…..Senator and 2oo4 Democrat presidential nominee John Kerry, who seems to own a Chinese variant of an AK-47. Also, most people who own them legally do not go on shooting rampages like James Holmes did: they tend to be gang bangers and other criminals, who do not own them legally.

Perhaps he should also look towards his own administration which ran assault rifles down to Mexico, handing them over to criminals bent on using them for non-battlefield related purposes. Anyhow, here we go

Obama bemoaned the lack of political will to tackle gun issues, noting how congressional leaders have so far shown little interest in advancing new legislation following the Colorado shooting.

“When there’s an extraordinarily heartbreaking tragedy like the one we saw, there’s always an outcry immediately after for action,” Obama said. “There’s talk of new reforms. There’s talk of legislation. And too often those efforts are defeated by politics and by lobbying and eventually by the pull of our collective attention elsewhere. But what I said in the wake of Tucson is we’re going to stay on this persistently.”

Obama said he’d “continue to work with members of both parties and with religious groups and with civic organizations to arrive at a consensus around violence reduction.”

In other words, Obama will talk and talk and talk, but His Majesty expects Someone Else to do the hard work in submitting legislation for Him to sign. Of course, even his own party will ignore them, because gun control is a losing issue. Perhaps he should try giving this talk in his hometown of Chicago, where people are being gunned down by illegal guns because law abiding citizens aren’t allowed to legally carry guns to protect themselves.

It’ll also be interesting to see if he stays on this subject “persistently”, or if his attention is drawn elsewhere. I’m betting that you never hear about this subject again.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Obama Brings Up Gun Control, Wants Others To Do The Work »

The Dark Knight Rises – To See Or Not See?

Like many other movies, such as Prometheus, The Dark Knight Rises had a ton of hype around it, and was widely anticipated to be a summer blockbuster. Well, mission accomplished! But, how good is it, really? Over at Rotten Tomatoes, it gets very high marks, but one thing you seem to see a lot is “it was great, but I expected more.” And that’s the problem with a highly anticipated movie.

I’m not much of a fan of the first one, but really liked the second one. Like with the Michael Keaton Batman, it was the Joker taking over the movie, with Heath Ledger doing what Jack Nicholson did, albeit in a much darker, more deranged manner. It’s hard to meet those expectations, which is why I’ve held off in writing despite getting out around 5pm.

So, I’ll give it a B-. I’m torn on whether or not it is really an evening full price movie or just an afternoon matinee and save a few bucks movie, but, since it is, what, 5 hours long (well, 2:45), I’ll give it the “it’s worth seeing at night” endorsement.

The bad guy, Bane, was good, but can’t live up to the Joker. Really, almost no character could have. It was more drama than Batman kicking the crap out of everyone. And, unfortunately, Ann Hathaway was wasted. Not really “The Catwoman”, it was like she was thrown in as some eye candy, and they forget to make her eye candy, because her lines were kinda lame, and she really didn’t add much. She’s sorta bad, sorta there. Might have been more fun if they had used Harley Quinn instead. That said, it was still well worth the time and money.

There’s a nice little twist at the end that you should enjoy. Leave your expectations at home, and just enjoy.

BTW, not sure if the preview for Total Recall makes it worth seeing or not. The short TV commercial is booooooring. Somewhat better for longer theater trailer.

Read: The Dark Knight Rises – To See Or Not See? »

If All You See…

…is a fossil fueled boat raising sea levels, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Other McCain, which provides some context on Mitt’s “Anglo-Saxon” comment.

Read: If All You See… »

Whiny President Whines About People Talking About Him As He Talks About Other People

Quick, someone get the Waaaaaa-mbulance. Or the Hypocrisy Mobile

(Politico) President Barack Obama said Tuesday that he’s losing his patience over the Republican attacks aimed at his “you didn’t build that” comment.

“I have to tell you, I generally have patience with what the other side says about me, that’s a requirement of this job,” Obama said during a $5,000-per-plate fundraiser here, according to the pool report.

“And if you don’t like folks talking about you, you probably shouldn’t run for president. The one thing I do have no patience for is this argument that somehow what I’m criticizing is success… I want to promote success,” Obama said.

Uh, you are, chump. Meanwhile, chump is constantly complaining about Mitt Romney succeeding and raising taxes on those who have succeeded. Go figure.

Jammie Wearing Fool: He generally has patience, except for sniveling and whining any time he receives the slightest bit of criticism.

Ed Morrissey eviscerates Obama on this. Darleen Click is obviously a raaaaacist for calling Obama “thin skinned”. And via The Lonely Conservative we get this new American Crossroads video

Notice, per JWF, that the clock is stuck at 11:06, the date of the election.

I’m wondering if I should add a “Whiny Bitches” category under “Democrats”.

Read: Whiny President Whines About People Talking About Him As He Talks About Other People »

Full Proposed UN Arms Control Treaty Released

Is it really as bad as some are making it out to be?

(CBS News) The first draft of a new U.N. treaty to regulate the multibillion dollar global arms trade sparked criticism Tuesday from campaigners seeking to keep illegal weapons from fighters, criminals and terrorists – and demands for changes before Friday’s deadline for action.

Peter Herby of the Geneva-based International Committee of the Red Cross said that every element in the draft has “major loopholes,” and he warned that if it’s adopted there’s “a very high risk” the treaty would continue the status quo and allow countries to just continue doing what they’re doing now or even do less.

But Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Washington-based Arms Control Association and Suzanne Nossel, executive director of Amnesty International USA, said that with a few key fixes the treaty could reduce the impact of the illicit arms trade and save lives and should be supported by the Obama administration.

At the Examiner we read

The proposed United Nations international Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) is out, and it is already running into trouble as many of the tenets are apparently contrary to United States law, to say nothing of the collision they might have with the Second Amendment.

Julianne Versnel-Gottlieb with the Bellevue-based Second Amendment Foundation reports from the U.N. headquarters in New York that the head of the U.S. delegation, Thomas Countryman, was quick to point out that provisions in the proposed treaty will run into trouble with existing law.

The thing is, I’ve read through the proposed treaty multiple times, looking for hidden nuggets, and really cannot find anything to get upset over. The treaty as written focuses on international arms sales and transfers, and it is all about exports, not domestic purchases. This would not effect the domestic purchasing of arms, of which handguns, rifles, and shotguns are mentioned. It’s not going to create a huge database of gun owners which would end up in UN hands.

Of course, as the drafts change, that could still happen, but right now it looks simply like a way to eliminate the sale of arms to crazy regimes, terrorists, people bent on genocide, etc, not the reduction of sales for legitimate purposes.

PS: If the Obama regime had been following these same rules as laid out in the Treaty, they would be in big trouble vis a vis Fast and Furious, as the treaty would have made that type of arms transfer illegal.

Read: Full Proposed UN Arms Control Treaty Released »

97% Of Greenland Ice Sheet Melts: Everybody Panic!!!!! (Every 150 Years)

Via a Memeorandum pull, the Guardian, along with many mouth breathing moonbats, are screaming about doom and gloom

Greenland ice sheet melted at unprecedented rate during July

We’re doomed. Or something

The Greenland ice sheet melted at a faster rate this month than at any other time in recorded history, with virtually the entire ice sheet showing signs of thaw.

The rapid melting over just four days was captured by three satellites. It has stunned and alarmed scientists, and deepened fears about the pace and future consequences of climate change.

In a statement posted on Nasa’s website on Tuesday, scientists admitted the satellite data was so striking they thought at first there had to be a mistake.

My goodness, melting in the middle of the summer? Weird!

About half of Greenland’s surface ice sheet melts during a typical summer, but Zwally said he and other scientists had been recording an acceleration of that melting process over the last few decades. This year his team had to rebuild their camp, at Swiss Station, when the snow and ice supports melted.

And, damnitall, unprecedented…..oh, wait

Lora Koenig, another Goddard glaciologist, told Nasa similar rapid melting occurs about every 150 years. But she warned there were wide-ranging potential implications from this year’s thaw.

So…..it happens? Anthony Watts chimes in, noting the melting is right on time

I had to laugh at the title of their press release, where they cite “Unprecedented Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Melt”,  then contradict themselves when the main researcher goes on to say “melting events of this type occur about once every 150 years on average. With the last one happening in 1889“. Do these guys even read their own press releases? Climatologist Pat Michaels concurs saying: “Apparently NASA should start distributing dictionaries to the authors of its press releases.”

Steven Goddard provides photos of Greenland before and after. Not a whole lot of difference. More from the Guardian

In this instance of this month’s extreme melting, Mote said there was evidence of a heat dome over Greenland: or an unusually strong ridge of warm air.

Ah. So weather happened. Hey, remember when Vikings colonized Greenland and grew grapes and lived an agrarian lifestyle? Until the climate changed and the world was plunged into the Little Ice Age. Darned Vikings must have been using fossil fueled combines to harvest their crops, causing it to get cold.

More: Bruce McQuain discusses, and provides some interesting charts.

Steve Bennan, posting at the Maddow Blog, conveniently forgets to mention the 150 year thing. Oh, and that Maddow’s TV show uses enormous amounts of energy, which, according to Warmists, is bad for globull warming.

Read: 97% Of Greenland Ice Sheet Melts: Everybody Panic!!!!! (Every 150 Years) »

Pirate's Cove