It would be very, very bad
India and Pakistan edge closer to war as nuclear-armed rivals trade strikes
India and Pakistan appeared to be edging closer to war on Saturday, as the two nuclear-armed nations both claimed they were provoked by the other before launching strikes against military assets in their rival countries.
Early Saturday, Pakistan’s armed forces said they targeted military sites inside India in response to an Indian missile attack at three air bases in Pakistan’s Punjab province. Hours later, India said its attack — which it claimed had hit four military bases in Pakistan — was in response to Pakistan attacking its civilian infrastructure.
Before Pakistan’s military action early Saturday, Pakistan’s chief military spokesman, Lt. Gen. Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, said India had targeted Nur Khan air base in Rawalpindi, Murid air base in Chakwal and Rafiqui air base near Shorkot with air-to-surface missiles. Most of the missiles, he said in a later appearance, were intercepted and there were no casualties or damage.
India’s actions, he said, were “pushing the whole region toward dangerous war,” and vowed a firm response. (snip)
The Indian government dismissed Pakistan’s claims of destruction of Indian military capacities, including damage to the country’s critical infrastructure such as power systems, as “completely false.” “It is Pakistani actions that have constituted provocation and escalation,” India’s Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said in a late morning news briefing.
Every day this seems to escalate more and more between two countries that despise each other. And have nuclear weapons
Foreign ministers of the Group of Seven nations on Friday issued a call for de-escalation and said the two countries should “engage in direct dialogue towards a peaceful outcome.”
Good sentiment, but, they hate each other
“There is no real historical precedent for what we’re seeing unfold,” said Asfandyar Mir, a senior fellow at the Stimson Center, a D.C.-based think tank. “We are now at a critical height on the escalation ladder.”
I’m rather surprised that no articles discuss what full scale war looks like between the nations.
(Metro UK) In 2019, a team of scientists investigated how a nuclear war between the two countries could start – and what the consequences could be for the rest of the world.
The direct effects of a nuclear exchange in India and Pakistan themselves would be apocalyptic.
Depending on the precise number of weapons used and their respective yields, anywhere between 50 million and 150 million people would be killed.
That is not to mention the cities obliterated, the millions more injured with no hope of immediate help, and the destruction of major infrastructure.
A slightly antiseptic way of saying this would be horrible
The huge amounts of smoke sent billowing into the stratosphere from those burning cities would block out sunlight, sending global temperatures plummeting by up to 10C.
Professor Brian Toon, a leading expert on climate and atmospheric science who co-authored the study, told Metro: ‘Even [nuclear war between] India and Pakistan can produce ice age temperatures with their arsenals.’
Which could cause serious problems with food production around the world, for one. And then all the nuclear fallout. Which could all result in one to two billion being killed around the world. Pakistan has 170 nuclear weapons and India has 164
The study estimates that 95 to 100% of the population would be left starving in Canada.
In Russia, the figure is 75 to 95%, while the proportion of people left starving in China was projected as 50% and 25% in the United States.
So, when JD Vance said this is not the problem of the U.S., which Karoline Leavitt contradicted in calling for de-escalation, he was wrong. This has world wide implications.
Whelp, I wrote this in the early morning for posting at 1030am, and, before it could even post
This has weirdly made many people, meaning Trump haters, upset.
Read: India And Pakistan Edge Closer To Full Scale War »