…is snow caused by an abundance of greenhouse gases, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Sundries Shack, with a post on the recovery that isn’t.
Read: If All You See… »
…is snow caused by an abundance of greenhouse gases, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Sundries Shack, with a post on the recovery that isn’t.
Read: If All You See… »
I think you can forgive me for using “Snap!” Been awhile, and this article deserves it (via Climate Depot)
(Washington Times) Scientists have been studying solar influences on the climate for more than 5,000 years.
Chinese imperial astronomers kept detailed sunspot records. They noticed that more sunspots meant warmer weather. In 1801, the celebrated astronomer William Herschel (discoverer of the planet Uranus) observed that when there were fewer spots, the price of wheat soared. He surmised that less light and heat from the sun resulted in reduced harvests.
Earlier last month, professor Richard Muller of the University of California-Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature (BEST) project announced that in the project’s newly constructed global land temperature record, “no component that matches solar activity†was related to temperature. Instead, Mr. Muller said carbon dioxide controlled temperature.
Could it really be true that solar radiation — which supplies Earth with the energy that drives our climate and which, when it has varied, has caused the climate to shift over the ages — is no longer the principal influence on climate change?
Consider the accompanying chart. It shows some rather surprising relationships between solar radiation and daytime high temperatures taken directly from Berkeley’s BEST project. The remarkable nature of these series is that these tight relationships can be shown to hold from areas as large as the United States.
Hmm, so, there is a big link between solar activity and climate. Let’s look at that chart

As the authors, Willie Soon and William M. Briggs (see the end of the article for their qualifications) point out, no such relationship can be ascertained when saying that CO2 is the primary driver of climate. It can’t. CO2 is a greenhouse gas, so, according to Warmist doctrine, as it goes up, temperature should go up with it. Yet, it hasn’t. Which is of course why Warmists are now blaming cold and snow on a greenhouse gas.
Make sure to read the entire article.
Read: Snap! Sunspots Do Impact Climate »
And you’re a big racist, so says David W. Blight in a NY Times op-ed
SUPPRESSING the black vote is a very old story in America, and it has never been just a Southern thing.
In 1840, and again in 1841, the former Frederick Bailey, now Frederick Douglass, walked a few blocks from his rented apartment on Ray Street in New Bedford, Mass., to the town hall, where he paid a local tax of $1.50 to register to vote. Born a slave on Maryland’s Eastern Shore in 1818, Douglass escaped in an epic journey on trains and ferry boats, first to New York City, and then to the whaling port of New Bedford in 1838.
By the mid-1840s, he had emerged as one of the greatest orators and writers in American history. But legally, Douglass began his public life by committing what today we would consider voter fraud, using an assumed name.
And the obvious conclusion is that if ID was required, Douglass wouldn’t have been allowed to vote, hence, we shouldn’t require ID of anyone, because …. well, just because, you damned dirty racists who just want to stop people from voting
To those potentially millions of young, elderly, brown and black registered voters who, despite no evidence of voter fraud, they now insist must obtain government ID, why not merely offer money? Pay them not to vote. Give each a check for $711 in honor of Frederick Douglass. Buy their “freedom,†and the election. Call it the “Frederick Douglass Voter Voucher.â€
Or, how about they just get an ID? Is Blight actually proposing that Blacks are incapable of getting a proper government ID? It sure seems like Democrats think Blacks aren’t smart enough to get a few bucks to purchase an ID.
Read: Good Grief: If You Support Voter ID, You Hate Frederick Douglass »
Ever notice that Warmists always see the cup as empty?
(Guardian) Periods of the earth’s warming are associated with an increase in biodiversity, according to a study published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. While this may sound like good news, the timescales involved cancel out any benefits they might experience from the rising temperatures.
Mayhew said: “What seems to be happening is that when we get a warming, this coincides with an upward shift in biodiversity in groups of organisms. So it looks like warm periods are boosting the generation of new species and that’s improving biodiversity. However a bit later, and when I say ‘a bit’, I mean several millions of years later, you get extinctions occurring.”
Overall, according to the story, biodiversity generally improves. So, it’s better but not better but maybe better….isn’t this what Darwinism is all about? Weird how Warmists turn into flat earthers, eh?
Read: Increased Biodiversity From Warming Is Apparently Bad »
…is a flooded world made worse by the use of a fossil fueled water vehicle, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The H2, with a post on dirty jobs.
Oh, and there’s a bonus “empty chair” photo below the fold, a bit more risque than I would put on the front page (SFW, though)
Read: If All You See… »
Everybody panic!!!!!!!!!
(Yahoo News) “The zombies are coming!” the Homeland Security Department says.
Tongue firmly in cheek, the government urged citizens Thursday to prepare for a zombie apocalypse, part of a public health campaign to encourage better preparation for genuine disasters and emergencies. The theory: If you’re prepared for a zombie attack, the same preparations will help during a hurricane, pandemic, earthquake or terrorist attack.
Oh. Just a drill that teases us with the coming zombie apocalypse. Crap!
Actually, this isn’t a bad idea. There are a bunch of zombie clubs around the country who mostly do it for pure fun, but they plan for the Z.A., all in fun, and often partner with first responders to help out.
But, yeah, sucks that’s not real. Sniffle. I actually read a ton of zombie books. Love ’em. They’re more about people surviving a calamity rather than about the zombies.
I heard this one yesterday while listening to Rush at the gym, and, unsurprisingly I was unsuprised at many of the answers Democrats provided
(The Blaze) Radio talk show host and erstwhile Senate candidate Peter Schiff has a long track record of trying to reason with his opponents, or at least engage with them fairly. The Connecticut based libertarian has taken on Lawrence O’Donnell on his home turf at MSNBC and most recently, even tried to engage with members of Occupy Wall Street in an 18 minute video that went viral last year.
Now, Schiff is back with a video from the DNC. Except this time, he’s taken on a rather different approach to engaging with his opponents. That is, rather than advocate his own views, he has shot video of himself playing devil‘s advocate for what many would consider to be a completely ridiculous extension of his opponents’ philosophy.
Schiff‘s target in this case is the Democrats’ seeming antipathy to corporate profits, which he attacks by pretending to be a radical Leftist who wants to ban corporate profits altogether, just to see if he can get any Democrats to agree with this economically absurd idea.
So while there’s not nearly universal agreement on the idea, and some people in the video force Schiff to moderate his position and others simply nod along politely, the video certainly shows a high degree of sympathy with the goal. And the immediate positive (and enthusiastic) reactions of several delegates, including one who enthusiastically calls for “corporate losses,†may strike some readers as either entertaining or disturbing.
The story writer, Mytheos Holt, isn’t particularly happy with this line of questioning, saying it isn’t good journalism. Holt misses the point that it’s not meant to be journalism, Schiff is a talk radio host, not a reporter. Anyhow, watch the video, and hear the replies
Peter Schiff’s blog post on this is here.
Peter Schiff’s official blog is here.
Read: Many Democrats Think We Should Ban All Corporate Profits »
Total bummer
(HuffPo) (Climate refugee) has primarily been an academic debate until now. New Zealand immigration authorities have just refused refugee status to a man from the drowning island country of Kiribati. The 36-year-old man sought refuge in New Zealand from climate change related harm, saying on his application that he fears for his children’s future on the coral atolls of Kiribati, which are elevated just slightly above sea level.
The I-Kiribati man has been in New Zealand since 2004. His visa expired recently, so he sought a more permanent solution to his sense of homelessness. During my recent trip to Kiribati, many spoke of New Zealand as a back up option that they would keep in the back of their mind. However, most that I spoke with want to remain in their homeland of Kiribati for as long as they can.
In other words, he didn’t want to go back to the poo infested waters of Kiribati so he decided to apply using the silly “climate refugee” crap. Pun intended.
The waters around Kiribati are not rising. In fact, the islands themselves are growing. Even if the waters were rising, how the heck do these flat earth Warmists think they came into being anyhow? The islands are coral based, hence, the seas had to be higher in the past to allow the coral to build what would become islands when the sea level went down.
But, then, who wouldn’t want to live in a paradise like New Zealand (ignoring that little issue of being on severe fault zones) versus islands that are barely above sea level to start with, are running out of fresh water because they’re tiny islands, and, oh, all that poo infested water?
Read: Bummer: Kiribati Man Denied “Climate Refugee” Status »