If All You See…

…are wonderful plants taking carbon pollution out of the atmosphere, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Sister Toldjah, with a post wondering if Obamacare’s pro-choice record will doom Kay Hagan.

This post was meant for two days ago, but I guess I hit “save draft” instead of “schedule post”, so, here’s a second post from ST, on Obama being toxic to Dem Senators.

Read: If All You See… »

Bummer: Still No Smoking Guns Against Chris Christie

First, this sounds like what the Left termed “uncivil discourse”, linking guns with a politician (hey, I don’t make the rules). Second, the Liberal Media has been investigating Christie non-stop since the day this “scandal” broke in a manner more reminiscent of a teen boy searching to see every video of their favorite porn star

No Smoking Guns Yet, But the Noose is Tightening Around Chris Christie

The New York Times is pretty clearly expending a lot of resources on the various Chris Christie scandals. So far they haven’t produced any smoking guns, but they’re sure digging up some stuff that doesn’t look good for Team Christie. First up is a look at the Christie political team, which was apparently obsessed with winning votes in Democratic-leaning towns. This wasn’t because the votes themselves were all that critical to Christie’s 2012 reelection campaign, but because winning in these places “would validate the governor’s argument that he would be the most broadly appealing Republican choice for president in 2016”:

Very violent laden headline. Second, Mother Jones’ Kevin Drum is surprised that a politician would be obsessed with winning votes?

The story doesn’t contain even a speck of proof that Christie had anything to do with the bridge closure. But it sure paints a suggestive picture. There’s obviously more to come on this.

After all these weeks and there is no proof of Christie wrongdoing, just proof that, shock!!!!!1!!! Christie is a *gasp* politician.

Read: Bummer: Still No Smoking Guns Against Chris Christie »

Stockman Considers Filing Articles Of Impeachment

It’ll never go anywhere, but the liberal media would have an opportunity to circle the wagons and be outraged…unlike when Democrats constantly talked about impeaching George W. Bush, and John Conyers (D) even held a mock impeachment in the basement of the Capital Building

(The Blaze) Just hours after he stormed out of President Obama’s State of the Union address Tuesday, Rep. Steve Stockman (R-Texas) announced he’s considering filing articles of impeachment against the president.

“I’m considering filing Articles of Impeachment against Barack Obama,” Stockman announced on a website backing his senate run.

“You see, I walked out of Obama’s State of the Union address last night,” Stockman’s announcement added. “Obama defiantly vowed not only to radically expand the reach of government from cradle to grave, but to smash the Constitution’s restrictions on government power while doing it.”

The Texas congressman explained that he left the president’s speech early because he was upset after “hearing how the president is further abusing his Constitutional powers.”

That post is entitled “Should I impeach Obama?”, and asks supporters whether he should file articles of Impeachment. This leads to a petition, which, quite frankly, is weak tea.

WHEREAS, Barack Obama openly declared war on the Constitution in his
State of the Union address Tuesday night; and

WHEREAS, Last year Congressman Steve Stockman said he would consider
filing Articles of Impeachment as a last resort to stop Obama; and

WHEREAS, Obama’s continued defiance of the Constitution and lawless
behavior has left Congress with few options; and

WHEREAS, Congress will not agree to impeach Obama unless millions of
Americans demand it;

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I hereby sign my name to this CITIZENS
PETITION TO IMPEACH BARACK OBAMA

Arkansas State Senator Jason Rapert also called for impeachment. If these folks want to do this, they need concrete reasons. For instance, violating the Constitution and law regarding the military action against Libya. And Teaparty.org has a long list of specific complaints.

Meanwhile, MSNBC is having a snit fit over Republicans walking out and referring to Obama as a dictator. Funny, they didn’t have an issue when Democrats were referring to Bush the same way. But, then, holy cow, have you seen MSNBC’s website as of late? Talk about spoonfeeding a far left partisan agenda.

Read: Stockman Considers Filing Articles Of Impeachment »

GOP 2016 Contenders Push To Decriminalize Marijuana

This isn’t so much about legalization, but decriminalization

(Washington Times) Republicans eyeing the White House in 2016 are pushing their party to change its stance and accept a softening of federal marijuana laws — a dramatic shift from the GOP’s most recent contenders who railed against the drug and questioned its medicinal value.

Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky has arguably been the most vocal on the subject, saying the federal government should leave the issue entirely to the states. Texas Gov. Rick Perry also argues that marijuana’s legal status should be a state issue, and he points to drug courts in his state that he said have helped move Texas toward decriminalization.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, meanwhile, has vowed to scrap the “failed war on drugs” altogether — more than four decades after President Nixon, a Republican, set it into motion by naming drug abuse as “public enemy No. 1 in the United States.”

Paul’s stance is no surprise, being more of a Libertarian, and certainly understanding the Constitution regarding State’s rights. Perry is a little bit more surprising, what with his “compassionate conservative” and social conservative leanings, though his is also a big State’s Rights guy. Christie, there is no surprise, he is for all intense purposes a Democrat, or at least an old-school Democrat. Much of his opposition to the criminalization of pot is due to having to incarcerate and waste time on pot offenses.

Perry, it should be noted, is not in favor of legalization, but understands that it is his job to look towards policies that reduce the load on the criminal courts.

Will this be a big issue during 2016? Doubtful. But, it would set up an interesting issue if either Paul or Perry won the White House. Both of them are big law and order guys. Pot is considered a Schedule I drug at the federal level. Would they work to get it removed from that classification, or simply ignore what the States are doing?

This could be an interesting issue to soft-pedal to the younger crowd.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: GOP 2016 Contenders Push To Decriminalize Marijuana »

Good News: Paul Ryan, GOP Leadership Set To Push Another Bad Immigration Plan

First off, there’s this

(Washington Times) Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus said Wednesday that there’s a “general consensus” in his party that something big needs to happen on overhauling the country’s immigration laws and that more specifics would be unveiled this week at House Republicans’ annual retreat.

“I think politically speaking it’s a mixed bag, but the question is whether or not it’s something we have to do as a country, and I think that’s what’s trumping the political answer,” Mr. Priebus said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” “You see in our party, whether it’s [Kentucky Senator] Rand Paul, who’s called for massive immigration reform, or [Florida Senator] Marco Rubio, I think you have general consensus that something big has to happen.”

Earlier in the day I noted a WSJ/NBC poll on American priorities, in relationship to “climate change” being dead last. Well, passing new immigration legislation was second to last. But, the GOP feels that they need to Do Something, and rather than getting tough, taking a stand for being a Nation Of Law over a Nation Of Men, it appears as if they’re moving down Squishy Lane towards Democratville (via Hot Air)

Ryan confirms GOP “principles” will include legal status for the 11 million, but he also says this will be a ”probationary status” to make sure the 11 million will not be “preferenced over people who did follow the laws.” It’s important to have confirmation that there will be a way out of the shadows. But the probationary period idea is problematic. Details will matter, but it would probably allow for people to get the right to work up front, but they could be kicked off of probationary status if certain security benchmarks aren’t met.

Advocates see this as bad policy: Why would undocumenteds step forward, if they know they can lose work status and get deported later because of nothing that they did, but only because Washington failed to decide certain metrics had been fulfilled?

However, Ryan also says the undocumented will be allowed to work as part of “probationary” status before security benchmarks are met. “You can be on probation,” Ryan says, “while the border is being secured.”

Ed Morrissey notes

Solution: No one comes out of the shadows until the border’s secured. The status quo on legalization holds in the meantime. There’s no rational reason why a country needs to make concessions to illegals before, or concurrent with, strengthening its borders, just as there’s no rational reason to think the GOP would use the security trigger to delay legalization ad infinitum. Everyone understands the demographic realities of the last election. Everyone knows how eager the Republican establishment is to attract Latino voters. And everyone knows how gleefully Democrats will demagogue them for dragging their feet on legalization while the border saga is playing out. Left to their own devices, Republicans would legalize illegals sooner rather than later. There’s no similar reason to believe that Democrats, left to their own devices, would eventually get around to tackling the border once legalization happened.

He also points out that this is pretty much the same kind of mule fritters encapsulated within the Gang Of 8 bill. But, really, don’t think Democrats will allow this to happen

(The Hill) House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Wednesday amplified the Democrats’ insistence that an immigration reform package include a pathway to citizenship for the nation’s illegal immigrants.

All Dems want are new voters beholden to the Dem Party. Republicans seem to think they’ll get some out of it. Neither of them are serving the purposes of the Constitution and law, nor the legal citizens of the USA

Read: Good News: Paul Ryan, GOP Leadership Set To Push Another Bad Immigration Plan »

If All You See…

…is a world killing bottle of water made from plastic!!!!!!!, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Nice Deb, with a post noting that Obama may have plagiarized part of Bush’s 2007 SOTU.

Read: If All You See… »

What Say To The TSA Being More Polite As They Grope You?

There could be legislation for that

(The Hill) Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) is threatening to introduce a bill requiring the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to be more polite to airline passengers.

During a hearing about the TSA’s Screening Partnership Program that took place this week, Connolly said passengers would likely cooperate more with TSA agents if the agency’s workers used better manners when they deliver their instructions.

“There’s no excuse for someone barking orders continuously at the public at any airport in America who is an employee of the federal government, or a contractor for the federal government,” Connolly said. “I’d lose my job if I treated the public that way and rightfully so. My staff would be fired if I find that they treated my public that way.”

In the public sector, you’d lose your job for groping people, much less being rude. You might face criminal charges and/or a lawsuit. Heck, there have been plenty of lawsuits where law enforcement officials have been sued for groping citizens. Would it really make any difference if they were more polite as they grope you? It might a little bit. When I received an enhanced pat-down at LAX back in 2010 (I have a stainless steel rod in my leg which usually sets off the machines), the TSA agent avoided “personal” areas and had the good sense to be polite and contrite. I had the feeling that he really, really did not want to be doing this.

Do we really need legislation to tell the TSA to be polite to citizens? If so, that should tell you something about the culture of the TSA. Now, if Connolly really wants to do something, he should add in that the enhanced pat-downs should be done behind screens, rather than having everyone in the airport watch people get groped. Second, there needs to be some serious common sense in exactly who gets the EPDs.

And maybe understand who we really need to be worried about are not the ones getting groped. But should be.

Also, to diverge a bit, perhaps he could have a talk with Mr. Obama, who seems to like to treat American’s who disagree with him in a rather shoddy manner.

Read: What Say To The TSA Being More Polite As They Grope You? »

Climate Change Is Dead Last On List Of American’s Priorities

Surprise? This comes via The Hockey Schtick, a Wall Street Journal poll on the state of the union and what Americans care about, along with Obama’s approval rating. Here’s the chart

Humorously, when Obama started yammering about “climate change” the Gore Effect kicked in, with light snow starting in D.C.

And why should people care? Warmists refuse to make their own lives “carbon neutral”. They won’t give up their own fossil fueled vehicles and travel. And Warmists continuously change the data

Multiple U.S. government bureaucracies including NOAA, NASA, and the Department of Energy are again being accused of inappropriately manipulating temperature data — or “adjusting” it, as officials at the agencies implicated in the scandal put it — to show global warming. While the accusations are not new, the latest scandal, sparked by an in-depth analysis of the data by independent analyst Steven Goddard at Real Science, relies on official records to suggest that federal agencies have been fudging temperature measurements to make past decades seem colder and recent years appear warmer.

Numerous scientists and experts confirmed Goddard’s explosive findings, but in separate responses to The New American, both NOAA and NASA attempted to downplay the significance of the accusations. The major problems identified by Goddard in the temperature records of federal bureaucracies relate to the U.S. Historical Climatology Network (USHCN), the official data-set covering the continental United States. While the agencies admit the records are adjusted, Goddard and multiple scientists suggested that biased methodology was used to adjust the data to show an unjustified and “spurious” warming trend.

The data is constantly being changed, typically cooling the past and warming the most recent years. The data is the data. If you change it again and again and again, that certain opens up the allegation that this is no longer science. But, then, it isn’t: “climate change” is about politics. Period.

Read: Climate Change Is Dead Last On List Of American’s Priorities »

Unsurprisingly, Obama Uses SOTU To Vow To Go It Alone

He literally created obstructionism by declaring that everyone hates his agenda. Because that’s what he does. Even on the few occasions he’s supposedly reached out (remember the “charm offensive”?) he’s coupled that with the same bitter, confrontational tone. And, no, I did not watch the his wish-list of partisan rancor, there’s no way I could take 45 minutes or so of him, and the NJ Devils were hell bent on losing to the Blues, but I can read a transcript

(NY Times) After five years of fractious political combat, President Obama declared independence from Congress on Tuesday as he vowed to tackle economic disparity with a series of limited initiatives on jobs, wages and retirement that he will enact without legislative approval.

Promising “a year of action” as he tries to rejuvenate a presidency mired in low approval ratings and stymied by partisan stalemates, Mr. Obama used his annual State of the Union address to chart a new path forward relying on his own executive authority. But the defiant “with or without Congress” approach was more assertive than any of the individual policies he advanced.

He’s essentially declared that he won’t work with Congress. So, the only difference between now and before is his openly declaring this during a State Of The Union speech. Because he’s been declaring this off and on since 2011. Doing it during the SOTU, though, was a direct shot that Mr. Obama, a supposed Constitutional scholar, will burn the Constitution in favor of a unilateral dictator-lite manner.

Furthermore, declaring that he won’t work with Congress gives Congress no reason to want to work with him. As it is, even his fellow Democrats in Congress typically want him to stay away during negotiations, as Obama tends to gum up the works. He’s a poor negotiator with, surprisingly for any politician, poor interpersonal people skills. He has no real network to the elected officials of either Party.

“I’m eager to work with all of you,” a confident Mr. Obama told lawmakers of both parties in the 65-minute nationally televised speech in the House chamber. “But America does not stand still — and neither will I. So wherever and whenever I can take steps without legislation to expand opportunity for more American families, that’s what I’m going to do.”

Building a contradiction into a pledge to work with Congress as poor leadership. Is anyone surprised in the least that Obama’s leadership skills have improved not a whit since his 2009 coronation?

The rest was mostly the typical Obama idiocy. While there were some nice points, such as the honoring of Army Ranger Cory Remsburg, an true hero, there were also lots of inaccuricies. And some like this

He touched on foreign policy, asserting that “American diplomacy backed by the threat of force” had forced Syria to give up chemical weapons and that “American diplomacy backed by pressure” had brought Iran to the negotiating table.

On Syria, it was, sadly, Soviet strongman Vladimir Putin who rescued Obama’s bacon, but the war still rages, and they haven’t actually given up their real WMD. As for Iran, the supposed gains were done by giving the house away. Per Iran, this deal essentially means nothing, that they can make a nuclear weapon at any time, and Team Obama refuses to release the text of the deal, meaning no one can see if Iran is full of it or the deal is super awesome for Iran.

But Mr. Obama’s message centered on the wide gap between the wealthiest and other Americans as he positioned himself as a champion of those left behind in the modern economy. “Those at the top have never done better,” he said. “But average wages have barely budged. Inequality has deepened. Upward mobility has stalled.

“The cold, hard fact is that even in the midst of recovery, too many Americans are working more than ever just to get by, let alone to get ahead,” he added. “And too many still aren’t working at all. So our job is to reverse these trends.”

Funny, because this is happening under Obama’s economic policies. He’s admitting his policies are terrible. Good thing he’s planning on making it worse.

He barely touched on his signature legislation, Obamacare, waiting til 40 minutes into his grandstanding. His yammering on “climate change” was typical Warmists idiocy. As I noted at WUWT

Obama: “Climate change is a fact. And when our children’s children look us in the eye…”

…they’ll wonder why a guy with a carbon footprint estimated at 41,000 tons, who sends his family and dogs off on separate flights for vacations in far off ritzy spots, who takes crosscountry flights to give 30 minute speeches, who keeps the White House at a toasty 77F, and who goes to the golf course every couple of weeks in a 17 vehicle motorcade has the cajones to lecture anyone.

Ted Cruzhttp://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-admin/post-new.php

The president’s taste for unilateral action to circumvent Congress should concern every citizen, regardless of party or ideology. The great 18th-century political philosopher Montesquieu observed: “There can be no liberty where the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or body of magistrates.” America’s Founding Fathers took this warning to heart, and we should too.

Rule of law doesn’t simply mean that society has laws; dictatorships are often characterized by an abundance of laws. Rather, rule of law means that we are a nation ruled by laws, not men. That no one—and especially not the president—is above the law. For that reason, the U.S. Constitution imposes on every president the express duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”

Obama doesn’t care. He’s from the Progressive school, what Jonah Goldberg terms “nice fascism”. He cares little for anything other than Obama. And if one vows to go it alone, to isolate themselves, they shouldn’t be surprised when that’s exactly what happens, and no one wants to play with him anymore.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Unsurprisingly, Obama Uses SOTU To Vow To Go It Alone »

Global Warming To Close Florida Schools

Won’t somebody please think of the children?

(Click Orlando) Schools, courts and government offices throughout the western Florida Panhandle plan to close because of anticipated snow and ice as a polar vortex grips much of the country.

The National Weather Service has issued a winter storm watch for the region. Forecasters say a mix of freezing rain and snow is expected Tuesday through Wednesday.

Schools in Santa Rosa and Escambia counties will be closed those days. Courts and many government offices also announced closures in advances of the wintry weather.

Those are the two western-most counties in Florida, up in the Panhandle. There are also closings in New Orleans and Mississippi from global warming created snow, ice, and cold. When Warmists told us that snow would be a thing of the past, I didn’t realize they were referring to the time when the Earth was in a cold age.

Read: Global Warming To Close Florida Schools »

Pirate's Cove