If All You See…

…are horrid fossil fueled vehicles that should be banned, except for being used to travel to anti-Keystone XL protests, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Lonely Conservative, with a post on a really alarming debt number.

Read: If All You See… »

Court Strikes Down Key Obamacare Component

Big breaking news on a ruling that has been pending for a couple weeks

(CNN) The battle over Obamacare took a dramatic turn Tuesday with a federal appeals court rejecting subsidies paid by the government to millions of new enrollees.

In a 2-1 ruling, a three-judge panel found the federal money that helped people afford health insurance only could go to those who signed up through exchanges run by states.

That’s what the law specified, the ruling said, meaning those who signed up through the federal government aren’t eligible for the subsidies that helped them afford coverage.

Only 16 states and the District of Columbia set up their own exchanges, meaning that most of the millions who signed up for subsidized health coverage overall under Obamacare could be affected.

Obviously, Team Obama will fight this, so it is surely headed to the Supreme Court. However, in the meantime, until all the legal battles play out, the subsidies will continue to be available to those who have obtained insurance through the federal exchanges.

Allahpundit notes

Plain and simple, if Congress wants to rewrite the law to extend subsidies to federal enrollees, they’re welcome to do it. That’s what legislatures are for. But the law, as written, says what it says, and that’s not the court’s problem.

He also points to an article by  Michael Cannon, which takes the position that this ruling means that the individual mandate would not apply in states without their own exchanges.

https://twitter.com/KevinWGlass/statuses/491590413388873728

Democrats have no one but themselves to blame for refusing to, you know, read the fricking bill.

I wonder if this ruling will get Obama to cancel a fundraiser? Na, but he will certainly give a passionate speech during the fundraisers, more passion than he gave for the civilian airliner shot down in the Ukraine.

More: I truly love how so many liberals are whining about “activist judges”, that the 2 judges are Republican appointees, that it was simply a typo, and how people can now blame Republicans.

Read: Court Strikes Down Key Obamacare Component »

If Everyone Is Not Forced To Go Vegan, We’re Doomed

Cause doom

(HuffPo) “We’re creating irreversibility in areas of global depletion. If we’re going to make it as a civilization or species, we have to change,” says Dr. Richard Oppenlander. “To move the world in the direction that’s truly more sustainable, the most efficient way possible means adopting fully organic, plant-based agricultural systems.”

Oppenlander (pronounced OPENlander, as in open your eyes) admits, “I take a hard line,” but he has reason. His exhaustively researched books “Food Choice and Sustainability” and “Comfortably Unaware” document seven areas of global depletion. “My goal was to create a platform, a timeline,” he says. And time is running out. “Tipping points have already been reached. We have 50 to 60 years of top soil use, and with climate change, we have a 50 to 75 year range before things become unbearable.”

Deforestation, climate change, fresh water shortage and other environmental arenas on the brink of global depletion share a common cause — “our food choice, specifically animal agriculture. Even if we moved to a fully plant-based diet today, 30 percent of the oceans are more acidic than they’ve been in historical times. These figures were not created by me. They came from very respected organizations, scientific organizations. I’m just the messenger.” (big snip)

Oppenlander still believes it’s up to national if not global policymakers to pave the way for real change. “They can’t just put this on the back burner.”

You can’t either. Meatless Monday helps, but Oppenlander doesn’t want people crapping out on the planet the other six days of the week. We don’t have that kind of time. “It’s hard to change our food preferences,” Oppenlander concedes. “But we have to start looking beyond self. We’re not the only thing that lives on earth.”

There you go, Warmists: every single one of you needs to go meatless 7 days a week. If you don’t, it means you hate the planet.

Read: If Everyone Is Not Forced To Go Vegan, We’re Doomed »

Exactly What Kind Of Crisis Does It Take For Obama To Change His Schedule?

And by “schedule”, I’m referring to all the non-POTUS business events, such as golf, campaigning, fundraising, meet and greets, that Obama constantly does

(Daily Caller) White House spokesman Josh Earnest affirmed Monday that the president won’t cancel any of his fundraising events this week despite the major international crises in Israel and Ukraine.

President Barack Obama, who was criticized last week for conducting a burger joint photo op while the downed Malaysian airliner was still smoldering on the ground, will be conducting a series of fundraisers on the west coast in the coming days.

When asked whether the White House was “concerned about the image that the president is going to be sending later this week — that he’s on fundraising trips while these two crises are going on at the same time,” Earnest replied that Obama can do his job “from the road” and that they won’t cancel any of his events.

“When the president travels he travels with an array of staff and advisers and communications equipment that allows him to do his job from where ever he happens to be, and that will be the case this week when he’s traveling,” he explained. “We want to make sure that the president has everything he needs to fulfill his responsibilities as the commander in chief and if it becomes clear that there is a need for him to come back to the White House in order to fulfill those functions then we’ll make a change in his schedule. Right now it’s not apparent that that’s the case.”

Interestingly, Liberals/Democrats assaulted George Bush for being at his home in Crawford, Texas, despite having all the same tools and staff, if not more. At the end of the day, it’s not about having the tools and staff, it’s about the optics. Obama typically had great optics during the campaigns in 2008 and 2012, but he and his political staff just do not seem to care whatsoever about the optics of continuing the non-POTUS events while Big Issues happen.

Now, Big Issues always happen. That said, is it appropriate to be seen shooting pool and drinking beer while avoiding visiting the border to see the “humanitarian crisis”? How about continuing his adulation while having a burger event when a civilian plane is shot down in the Ukraine? Add in a military confrontation between Israel and Hamas, Iraq in meltdown, Syria, and others, and one wonders what it will take to get Obama to focus on his job. Remember, not even the murder of 4 Americans, including our Ambassador to Libya, could get Obama to change his schedule (BTW, I’ve said before and I’ll say again, I believe the “it was a video” talking points were implemented in order to protect Obama refusing to do his job and going on the fundraising trip in the aftermath of Benghazi).

Politics rely heavily on optics. Obama just doesn’t seem to give a damn about his optics when it comes to Doing The Job.

Read: Exactly What Kind Of Crisis Does It Take For Obama To Change His Schedule? »

NY Times Wrings Their Hands Over Whether Israeli Tactics To Protect Civilians Works

Interestingly, we never see these kinds of articles in much of the major world (non-Israeli) media when it is Hamas or some other Islamist group launching attacks which are intentionally intended to target Israeli civilians, using methods such as suicide bombers and rocket attacks

Tactics Questioned as Civilian Toll Climbs

The blast from the Israeli strike was so powerful that it threw an iron door clear over several neighboring houses. It came to rest along with a twisted laundry rack still laden on Monday with singed clothes and a child’s slipper.

When the strike leveled a four-story house in the southern Gaza Strip the night before, it also killed 25 members of four family households — including 19 children — gathered to break the daily Ramadan fast together. Relatives said it also killed a guest of the family, identified by an Israeli human rights group as a member of the Hamas military wing, ostensibly Israel’s target.

The attack was the latest in a series of Israeli strikes that have killed families in their homes, during an offensive that Israel says is meant to stop militant rocket fire that targets its civilians and destroy Hamas’s tunnel network.

The Palestinian deaths — 75 percent of them civilians, according to a United Nations count — have prompted a wave of international outrage, and are raising questions about Israel’s stated dedication to protecting civilians.

Let’s face it, Israel is always going to be condemned by Leftists around the world, who, like the Islamists, despise Israel and Jews (sadly, there are plenty of Jews who feel the same way) and want Israel pushed into the sea. When they are being attacked with rockets, Israel is blamed and told they are the aggressor, that Israel is a terrorist nation, that Israel should stop doing (insert mean thing here) to those poor Palestinians. We hear about “disproportionate responses”. Perhaps Israel should just launch the same types of missiles Hamas uses towards Gaza, let the chips fall whatever way they will. Then they will be condemned.

Israel blames Hamas, saying they have chosen to keep operating among civilians.

But while Israel has in the past killed Hamas members with attacks so precise that others riding in their cars have survived, in this conflict, there have been numerous instances of family homes being struck with residents inside. More and more Palestinians are accusing Israel of trying to inflict maximum suffering to demoralize Palestinians and weaken support for Hamas.

Perhaps if Hamas didn’t embed themselves and their weapons within civilian areas, this wouldn’t be a problem.

The article continues it’s soft condemnation of Israel, but, at the end of the day, all Israel wants is to be left alone. The answers are simple: Hamas and the other Palestinians need to stop the attacks, stop digging tunnels into Israel, and turn Gaza into a nice place to live, rather than an armed Islamist camp. It’s on Gazans to stop perpetuating the cycle of violence. If they stop, Israel won’t respond.

On Monday, the neighborhood was ghostly quiet. Most residents had fled, and where the home had been was a deep bomb crater and piles of rubble.

At the house next door, a little girl, seeing journalists approach in flak jackets, sat on a stoop, put her face in her hands and wept.

And we can blame this on Hamas, and all the Leftist Israel haters who mostly refuse to tell Hamas, Hezbollah, and other Islamist groups, to stop their attacks. The support from international Israel haters emboldens the Islamists to attack. The blood is on their hands.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: NY Times Wrings Their Hands Over Whether Israeli Tactics To Protect Civilians Works »

Obama Makes Everything About Obama

Earlier, I posted on E.J. Dionne whining about Republicans making everything about Obama, and noted

Obama makes virtually every crisis about himself by failing to act as POTUS. He typically speaks in “I” and “me”, rarely “us” and “we”. Then he disappears to do anything but the job.

Well, Obama was 25 minutes late to his own statement today, said nothing of consequence, didn’t seem to give a damn regarding the plane shoot down, and said (via Ace)

“My preference continues to be finding a diplomatic resolution within Ukraine–I believe that can still happen, that is my preference today and it will continue to be my preference…”

He rarely speaks in terms of American policy. Mostly it’s All About Obama. So, when he is criticized, it shouldn’t be a surprise.

Obama’s statement was simply a ohoto-op to show the Low Information Voters that he’s still here. Plus, his narcissism.

Read: Obama Makes Everything About Obama »

What Happens When Almost Everything Is Considered Sexist?

There is real sexism in the world. It’s also a two way street, but, let’s be honest, most sexism is from men towards women. One thing to consider is what is really sexist and what isn’t. Is Augusta National, which pretty much excludes women, sexist? If so, then wouldn’t a women only health club or college be sexist?

(AP) When Laura Bates was followed home one night by a man from her bus, she didn’t think much of it. Incidents like that just seemed to be part of living in London.

But the writer said several other similar situations followed within days: One stranger shouted obscenities at her out of a car window. Another propositioned her forcefully in a cafe. A third groped her on the bus, and commuters looked away when she spoke up. She was startled not so much by the incidents — but how accustomed she had become to brushing such behavior aside and not taking action.

“I started talking to other women, and I couldn’t believe how many stories they had. I think many of us just think ‘maybe I’m unlucky,'” said Bates, 27, in an interview. “Just like me, so many of them said ‘until you asked me, I’ve never talked to anyone about this.'”

The problem here is that not one of those things was sexism. Why were the obscenities yelled, and what were they? Groping? Criminal, but not sexism. A man propositioning her? Not sexism.

Those conversations triggered the birth of the Everyday Sexism project, a website that Bates set up for women to share their experiences of sexism and harassment in their daily lives — in the office, on the train, in school or on the street. Two years on, what started as a simple idea has become a movement that is steadily gaining momentum, galvanizing support from politicians, police and thousands of women and men from Britain and beyond.

The project has collected 70,000 posts from some 20 countries, describing a wide range of unwelcome behavior and offenses from a colleague’s casual comment to unreported rapes. Many tell of assault, threats of violence and verbal abuse in public places. Others report seemingly innocuous behavior and comments: One woman tells how a sales assistant handed back her change to her male friend, after she had paid for the goods.

The problem is that they are labeling everything as sexism. Some things are certainly sexist, like possibly the change incident. Many are inappropriate conduct, but aren’t sexism. Again, many are criminal, but the intent, the mindset, isn’t sexism, or even sexist

“There were men in their office printing off pictures of female applicants and rating them out of ten. Other women say their colleagues went to strip clubs at lunch time with clients and they just missed out on these deals,” she said. Many such incidents go unreported largely because women are afraid of losing their jobs, she said.

Not sexist, but certainly inappropriate.

“People say sexism doesn’t exist anymore,” Bates said. “But it really is one of those things where once you see it, you can’t stop seeing it all around you.”

Sure, it exists. I know a man who was treated in a sexist manner by women. I know a woman who filed suit over pay inequality, and there was a real case (she had been there longer, had a better track record, and a better sales record). But we can’t, or shouldn’t, equate everything as sexism. We also should not regulate all thought. Some people are jerks. In some cases actions and words should mean someone is Held Responsible. We can all agree on that, right? But if I ogle a woman’s derrière, covered in a tight yoga pant with the word juicy, is that sexist, or simply an appreciation of the female form? According to this group, it makes me sexist, and I should be reported.

Is it sexist that men are often treated like doofus’ in TV shows and commercials?

PS: how can men not look and comment when radical feminist want women to wear things like this?

Read: What Happens When Almost Everything Is Considered Sexist? »

If All You See…

…is a horrid CO2 infused beer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Jammie Wearing Fools, with a post on those peaceful Occupy Wall Street nutters.

Read: If All You See… »

We’re Saved: Warmists Come Up With Concept Of Giant PV Duck

Of all the silly spreading awareness things the Warmists come up with, this one is rather amusing

(PV Magazine) A team of London-based artists have come up with a unique renewable energy generator and storage concept for this year’s Land Art Generator Initiative Design Competition in Copenhagen: a giant energy duck that covered in solar panels and equipped with hydraulic turbines capable of producing electricity 24 hours a day.

Designed by Hareth Pochee, Adam Khan, Louis Leger and Patrick Fryer, the public artwork proposal would also serve as an interactive and educational tourist destination while also celebrating local wildlife.

According to the artists’ submission, the Energy Duck is modeled on the eider duck, which is found in the waters of Copenhagen. The fact that the eider duck’s breeding habitat has been at increasing risk from the effects of climate change inspired the team to use its form to raise awareness of the local impacts of the global environmental threat.

Said “duck” is designed to float in Copenhagen’s harbor, and will be 12 stories tall. It’s actually pretty ingenious. A nice energy alternative. Why did they have to ruin it by injecting Hotcoldwetdry?

While the initiative does not guarantee that the winning projects will be realized, it seeks to promote and support the transition to alternative energy by stimulating and challenging public opinion about what clean energy can look like.

In other words, this is pretty much a spreading awareness contest. Nothing more. Shame. Energy Duck would be kinda cool.

Read: We’re Saved: Warmists Come Up With Concept Of Giant PV Duck »

Israel Asks: What Would You Do?

For liberals, the answer would be a bit of navel gazing, wondering “what did we do to make Hamas send a constant rain of rockets which intentionally target civilians?” Remember, they took this tact almost immediately after 9/11.

(Washington Times) The official Twitter account for the Israeli Defense Forces on Monday sent out a picture of the London skyline being bombarded with missiles and the caption “What would you do?” as fighting continued in Gaza.

“Hamas terrorists just fired rockets at southern and central Israel. What if they were attacking your home?” reads the tweet, which is accompanied by a doctored image of incoming rockets and an explosion over the Houses of Parliament.

An IDF spokesman told The Telegraph the picture was crafted by the military’s “interactive media branch” to illustrate what Israel is going through as Hamas launches rockets at targets in the country.

“It’s an iconic image. When people look at the image they realize what country we’re talking about,” said Captain Eytan Buchman. “If a rocket landed near Westminster, it’s not a reality that any country could tolerate.”

From the Telegraph article

James Clappison MP, the Parliamentary Chairman of Conservative Friends of Israel, supported the advert.

“For a long time rockets have been fired into Israel and that hasn’t been reported. We would not permit rockets to be fired at our country. We would take action.”

He added he wanted to see an end to the bloodshed but added: “This is Hamas’ choice. The ball is in their court.”

Obviously, the Typical Hamas Apologists did not like the tweet, and Blame Israel, showing their Israeli hatred and hatred of Jews. Hamas are the ones targeting civilians and surrounding their arms with human shields, including children, yet the Israel haters call Israel the terrorists and bad guys. It wasn’t Israel which tore down the 3,000 greenhouses in Gaza and turned it into a war camp.

https://twitter.com/WilliamTeach/status/490901920748273664

Read: Israel Asks: What Would You Do? »

Pirate's Cove