California Looks To Thwart Federal Immigration Law By Targeting Private Business

Hey, remember when we were told by Democrats that federal law trumps state law? Things like Arizona’s SB1070, anti-gay marriage and anti-gender confused men in girl’s bathrooms bills/referendums, and so forth? Huh

California bills target private business to help immigrants

California Democrats are expanding their efforts to resist President Donald Trump’s crackdown on immigrants in the country illegally with bills aimed at limiting how much private businesses can cooperate with federal immigration authorities.

Democrats control all levels of state government, and leaders have vowed to resist Trump administration policies at every turn. Immigration is among their key issues, but most legislation so far has been aimed at limiting what police can do to help immigration authorities and providing additional state services and support to immigrants in the country illegally.

Now, two bills that advanced in the Assembly in the past week are taking aim at private businesses.

A measure that would bar landlords from disclosing tenants’ immigration status or reporting them to immigration officials passed the chamber. A bill prohibiting public and private employers from letting immigration agents come into their worksites or view their employee files cleared a committee.

Both bills contain exceptions if employers or landlords are complying with a warrant or subpoena.

In other words, this is a crackdown on employers and landlords from complying with federal laws voluntarily, which the law kinda requires that they comply with the law voluntarily.

Assemblyman Kevin Kiley, who opposes the measures, said he thinks they could actually promote fear in immigrant communities, and existing laws already protect tenants. He said the proposals, along with many of the other immigration bills introduced this session, are designed more to make a political statement than to enact good policy.

“If you have a private citizen who provides certain information at the behest of a federal authority, they might end up facing (consequences) just for complying with the request,” the Sacramento-area Republican said. “Measures like that do more harm than good.”

Meanwhile, the California jails are overflowing with criminal illegal aliens. Murderers, rapists, thieves, gang members, etc. Hospital emergency rooms have closed due to illegals using them as doctor’s offices. And so many more issues. It’d be funny as hell if Trump said “we aren’t going to bother going after illegals in California, so all who are here illegally should go there.” Let California deal with the fallout.

Read: California Looks To Thwart Federal Immigration Law By Targeting Private Business »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Patriotic Pinup Ren Wicks

Happy Sunday! It’s a gorgeous day in America, a weekend to remember all those who gave their lives to defend the nation. This pinup is by Ren Wicks, with a wee bit of help.

What’s happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. The Lid discusses yet another stupid lawsuit
  2. The Last Tradition covers the Portland killer Jeremy Christian and who he voted for
  3. The Last Tradition discusses Obama spying on the Trump campaign and the unmaskings
  4. The First Street Journal discusses how the left reacts to a sexist movie screening
  5. The Daley Gator notes that college campuses are the home to fascism
  6. Raised On Hoecakes covers shaming restaurants
  7. Powerline has a lesson in economics and immigration
  8. Neo-neocon covers how the Manchester bomber got his funding
  9. MOTUS A.D. discusses the unreality media
  10. Moonbattery notes what’s being blamed for the Manchester bombing
  11. Legal Insurrection covers the refugees increase by Trump’s State dept
  12. Jihad Watch notes what song got the UK police bent out of shape
  13. Heat Street covers the threat that Trump supposedly represents to the porn industry
  14. Flopping Aces discusses kissin
  15. And last, but not least, Fire Andrea Mitchell notes that three White House leakers have been identified

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Trump Supposedly Ready To Pull Out Of Worthless Paris Climate Agreement

Is this something? Is it real? Axios’ Johnathan Swan and Amy Harder have a bold scoop

Scoop: Trump tells confidants U.S. will quit Paris climate deal

President Trump has privately told multiple people, including EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, that he plans to leave the Paris agreement on climate change, according to three sources with direct knowledge.

Publicly, Trump’s position is that he has not made up his mind and when we asked the White House about these private comments, Director of Strategic Communications Hope Hicks said, “I think his tweet was clear. He will make a decision this week.”

Why this matters: Pulling out of Paris is the biggest thing Trump could to do unravel Obama’s climate policies. It also sends a stark and combative signal to the rest of the world that working with other nations on climate change isn’t a priority to the Trump administration. And pulling out threatens to unravel the ambition of the entire deal, given how integral former President Obama was in making it come together in the first place.

Caveat: Although Trump made it clear during the campaign and in multiple conversations before his overseas trip that he favored withdrawal, he has been known to abruptly change his mind — and often floats notions to gauge the reaction of friends and aides. On the trip, he spent many hours with Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, powerful advisers who back the deal.

Here’s the thing, as mentioned in the “caveat”: Trump made plenty of promises to pull out of Obama’s Paris Climate Agreement prior to the election. Yet, he’s been in office for over four months, and he has still not rescinded Obama’s signature on the document. He had plenty of time post-election to cobble something together in order to terminate America’s participation (due to one climahypocrites decree) in this massive forced taxpayer money distributive scheme which would make almost no difference in the global temperature, a whopping .3C by 2100, at a cost of $1 to $2 trillion per year globally. That’s if the computer models from the Cult of Climastrology can be trusted. And they can’t. It would most likely make no difference to the temperature, but, it would be great for the fascists who want to enable more and more power in centralized governments.

The unnamed official lays out three ways that Trump could do this. First is send a notification that America is pulling out, which could take years, and would give Trump time to change his mind. Second, he could put it up to the Senate for ratification, which would certainly end with it being toast. Even with the Warmist GOP Senators, such as Lindsay Graham and John McCain, it wouldn’t get the 2/3rds necessary.

Third, he could simply pull out of the entire U.N. hotcoldwetdry framework, the entire Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change, the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

There is a fourth option, which few discuss, and could be tricky, and that’s simply to sign an executive order disposing of Obama’s signature on the Paris agreement, since the original signature amounted to an executive order. Despite the document being set up to avoid handing it to the Senate for agreement as a treaty, it still resembles a treaty, which requires the Senate to agree. As that never happened, Trump could whack it with the old John Hancock.

He could also say that while the U.S. will not pull out, we will not participate in anything having to do with the PCC, since it is, essentially, voluntary at its heart. This is dangerous, as it would leave it in force for a future Democrat president.

What happens? I guess we’ll see.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Trump Supposedly Ready To Pull Out Of Worthless Paris Climate Agreement »

Ever Told A Great White To F Off?

When they talk about men being men, they were talking about this guy (via Radass)

Click the more tag, in single post.

Read More »

Read: Ever Told A Great White To F Off? »

Tough Time Sleeping? Blame ‘Climate Change’

This is what cults do. Blame/link everything

From the link

I’s no surprise that a change in our planet’s climate would affect our coastlines, our weather patterns and our food supply. But here’s something you may not have considered before: Global warming might also affect how well we sleep at night.

In a paper published Friday in Science Advances, researchers show that when local temperatures get unusually high people don’t sleep as well as they usually do. And if climate trends continue, we can expect to have more frequent heat waves that also last longer.

How did humans survive all the previous warm periods?

Read: Tough Time Sleeping? Blame ‘Climate Change’ »

If All You See…

…is a wonderful city full of believer in climate change, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Legal Insurrection, with a post on Hillary’s coughing commencement.

It’s actually hard to find shots of Melissa Benoist in skimpy clothes, sexy clothes, heck, even swimsuits. She doesn’t seem to be the kind of celebrity running around doing Instagram stuff, flaunting her body (then complaining about body shaming), or any of the other things we see from celebs. Underneath the fold is the closest you’re really going to find for her, so, a second blog of the day is Maggie’s Farm, with a post on James Watson being blackballed

Read: If All You See… »

Trump Pulling U.S. Out Of Paris Climate Accord Could Cause A Massive 0.36F Rise In Temperatures

It could be time to panic, per uber-Warmist Seth Borenstein

What happens to Earth if the US exits the climate deal?

Earth is likely to hit more dangerous levels of warming even sooner if the U.S. pulls back from its pledge to cut carbon dioxide pollution, scientists said. That’s because America contributes so much to rising temperatures.

President Donald Trump, who once proclaimed global warming a Chinese hoax, will soon decide whether the United States stays in or leaves a 2015 Paris climate change accord in which nearly every nation agreed to curb its greenhouse gas emissions.

Other global leaders have been urging him to stay during high level security and economic meetings in Italy that began Friday. Pope Francis already made the case with a gift of his papal encyclical on the environment when Trump visited the Vatican earlier this week.

In an attempt to understand what could happen to the planet if the U.S. pulls out of Paris, The Associated Press consulted with more than two dozen climate scientists and analyzed a special computer model scenario designed to calculate potential effects.

Yes, those who computer models which have failed 95% of the time.

One expert group ran a worst-case computer simulation of what would happen if the U.S. does not curb emissions, but other nations do meet their targets. It found that America would add as much as half a degree of warming (0.3 degrees Celsius) to the globe by the end of century.

Scientists are split on how reasonable and likely that scenario is.

In other words, they know it is a bunch of mule fritters, but, they’re cool with going along with the doom and gloom

Another computer simulation team put the effect of the U.S. pulling out somewhere between 0.1 to 0.2 degrees Celsius (.18 to .36 degrees Fahrenheit).

While scientists may disagree on the computer simulations they overwhelmingly agreed that the warming the planet is undergoing now would be faster and more intense.

So, in order to supposedly save the Earth from a tiny bit of warming per computer models and soothsaying, we need a massive monetary redistribution scheme, which will have virtually no impact on the climate but cost a $100 trillion, and have devastating effects on economies.

Can you even tell the difference with .18 to .36F?

Read: Trump Pulling U.S. Out Of Paris Climate Accord Could Cause A Massive 0.36F Rise In Temperatures »

Former Durham, NC Illegal Alien Deported, Trump Blamed

This has given Democrats who excuse certain lawless people (see the previous post) a sad and a TDS

Former Durham student deported after struggling to stay in U.S.

A former Durham student struggling to stay in the United States has been deported after a long and highly-publicized fight to stay in the country and marry her high school sweetheart.

Wendy Miranda, 23, was born in El Salvador. She’s been held at the Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center in Louisiana since March.

Indeed, Miranda has kept a clean record since entering the U.S., but she’s been on the government’s radar since she was first caught trying to cross the U.S.-Mexico border in 2008. According to federal officials, Miranda was an unaccompanied teenager, and thus granted temporary entry into the United States, pending deportation hearings.

An ICE official confirmed to ABC11 that Miranda-Fernandez’s “removal was complete” and she is now in El Salvador.

“U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) removed unlawfully present Salvadoran national Wendy Miranda-Fernandez May 26 pursuant to a final order of removal issued by a federal immigration judge in August 2016,” said Bryan D. Cox, a spokesman for ICE. “Ms. Miranda was removed after receiving all appropriate legal process before the federal immigration courts.”

Note the date.

“Her removal today sends her back into the same violence that she fled,” Butterfield added. “Ms. Miranda-Fernandez’s case is a truly unfortunate example of what is now possible under the Trump Administration’s immigration enforcement policies.”

That would be G.K. Butterfield, Congressman for North Carolina’s 1st federal House district, and a Democrat. The order was given back in August, 2016. Who was president then? Could Trump have done something now? Sure. If he wanted to get into micromanaging the deportation of individuals. Chances are, he had no idea who the heck Miranda was. This is just another case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Obama had five months to deal with this. Heck, he could have done something well before the final order. I guess Trump ascends time and space for his anti-illegal immigrants policies.

From the comments at WTVD

“Miranda’s family claimed she fled her native El Salvador after witnessing a crime and worried her life was threatened by gang violence.”

Yet she moved to Durham…..

Well, there is that. It’s one of those “I guess you have to live around here to get it” moments, but, Durham isn’t exactly a safe place. It’s no Chicago, Baltimore, or Detroit, but, yeah, yet another Democratic Party run city with an oversized violent crime issue.

Miranda had a choice if she wanted to escape El Salvador and the violence. Come here legally and do things the proper way, or do it illegally. She chose poorly.

Read: Former Durham, NC Illegal Alien Deported, Trump Blamed »

Washington Post: The House Shouldn’t Tolerate Greg Gianforte Or Something

The Washington Post has a sad moonbattery over Greg Gianforte being elected to the House of Representatives, and thinks the House should Do Something about it

Gianforte’s behavior was inexcusable. The House should not tolerate it.

“GIANFORTE GRABBED Jacobs by the neck with both hands and slammed him into the ground behind him.” That was Fox News reporter Alicia Acuna’s account of how Greg Gianforte allegedly assaulted Guardian reporter Ben Jacobs, the day before Mr. Gianforte won a special election to fill Montana’s at-large congressional seat. Along with an audio recording of the incident, the eyewitness accounts confirm that the now-congressman-elect engaged in brutish behavior. That he subsequently tried to blame Mr. Jacobs for the incident, in which the reporter was merely asking an honest question, makes Mr. Gianforte’s actions all the more inexcusable.

Inexcusable means inexcusable. The House, led by Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.), who said “there’s never a call for physical altercation,” should have made clear that Mr. Gianforte would not be welcome in the chamber. Instead, the speaker said , “If he wins, he has been chosen by the people of Montana.” Other Republicans were even more forgiving. “It’s not appropriate behavior,” Rep. Duncan D. Hunter (R-Calif.) reportedly told the Associated Press’s Mary Clare Jalonick. “Unless the reporter deserved it.” According to Texas Tribune reporter Patrick Svitek, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) held up a bullet-riddled gun-range target sheet and said, “I’m gonna carry this around in case I see any reporters.”

Well, yes, it is inexcusable. Or is it? Everyone makes mistakes. Everyone has a breaking point. Remember, though, this is a paper that preaches tolerance towards Islamic jihadis and terrorist groups. A paper that was extremely supportive towards all those wonderful extremists who run Iran in terms of Obama’s Iran deal. A paper that tended to be supportive of the violence, riots, assault, arson, and theft surrounding the Black Lives Matter movement in the wake of Ferguson and other incidents.

How many Democrats really had a problem with this inexcusable behavior? Both Kennedy and Byrd were lionized during their time in office. The Washington Post’s Jonathan Capehart yammered on about Byrd at least apologizing, in reference to David Duke. Uh huh.

Conservatives react with outrage at stories of intolerant college activists violently protesting right-wing speakers. Members of the Trump administration talk of fighting a war for “civilization,” a term that, if it means anything, stands for the proposition that disagreements are not settled brutally. Republicans must bring the same sense of moral certainty to the case of Mr. Gianforte — or they must admit they care about these essential principles only when it is politically convenient.

People who supported Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd, and hold up abortion on demand as their number one support issue have no right to ever discuss morals.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Washington Post: The House Shouldn’t Tolerate Greg Gianforte Or Something »

Obama’s So Worried About People’s Carbon Footprints, You Guys

It’s always nice to be lectured about ‘climate change’ by this guy

Uh huh

Huh. There’s photos of him drinking from an evil plastic bottle, and think of the carbon footprint from all those who took fossil fueled trips to see him play golf.

https://twitter.com/WilliamTeach/status/868116732199804929

Someone needs a Hypocrisy Offset.

Read: Obama’s So Worried About People’s Carbon Footprints, You Guys »

Pirate's Cove