…is carbon pollution created snow spreading to warm Asian nations, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is 90Ninety Miles From Tyranny, with a post on the 90 Miles Mystery Box.
Read: If All You See… »
…is carbon pollution created snow spreading to warm Asian nations, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is 90Ninety Miles From Tyranny, with a post on the 90 Miles Mystery Box.
Read: If All You See… »
You just knew this stuff was coming, right? That the Cult of Climastrology would use Christmas to push their own cultish beliefs? (all the bold was from the article)
(Blasting News) Outspoken former Oasis lead singer #Liam Gallagher has been giving his backing to #climate change awareness recently, as he demonstrated an acute appreciation for the #Global Issues facing humanity through a new project for the festive period. His seasonal contribution to a heart-warming cartoon entitled ‘The Very Hot Snowman’ saw the strongly opinionated singer/songwriter lend his distinctive voice to the narration of the timely tale.
The younger of the often-argumentative Gallagher brothers has been keen to push the underlying theme that the children’s cartoon seeks to promote, as the story centres on a snowman whose very existence is endangered by rising temperatures across the globe.
A modern-day spin on a classic Christmas tale maybe, but 45-year-old Liam is vehement in his message that “the Earth is too hot, and it’s getting hotter.â€
Man, if only Gallagher hadn’t used so much in the way of fossil fuels to travel around the world playing concerts.
(Mashable) “It’s winter, and it’s cold this time of year isn’t it?†Gallagher says in the clip with his northern accent. “Maybe you want to snuggle up with a hot chocolate or wrap up warm and wear your biggest coat. But in the grand scheme of things, our Earth is too hot, and it’s getting even hotter.”

These people
Read: Former Oasis Frontman Cuts Ad On ‘Climate Change’ And Christmas »
It looks like the United Nations has gotten a bit too big for their britches, thinking they can nullify U.S. law and presidential decisions
UN to vote Monday on call for US Jerusalem decision to be withdrawn
The United Nations Security Council is due to vote on Monday on a draft resolution calling for the withdrawal of U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, diplomats said, a move likely to face a Washington veto.
The one-page Egyptian-drafted text, seen by Reuters, does not specifically mention the United States or Trump. Diplomats say it has broad support among the 15-member council, and while it is unlikely to be adopted, the vote will further isolate Trump on the issue.
To pass, a resolution needs nine votes in favor and no vetoes by the United States, France, Britain, Russia or China.
Trump abruptly reversed decades of U.S. policy this month when he recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, generating outrage from Palestinians. Trump also plans to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv.
The Jerusalem Embassy Act was passed in 1995, and declared that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel, and that the U.S. embassy would be moved to the city. In fact, it was Bill Clinton, George Bush, and Barack Obama who failed to uphold the law. Trump is following the law.
Arab foreign ministers agreed to seek a UN Security Council resolution on the issue. The draft UN text expresses “deep regret at recent decisions concerning the status of Jerusalem.”
It “affirms that any decisions and actions which purport to have altered, the character, status or demographic composition of the Holy City of Jerusalem have no legal effect, are null and void and must be rescinded in compliance with relevant resolutions of the Security Council.”
The draft also calls upon all countries to refrain from establishing diplomatic missions in Jerusalem. (snip)
The draft council resolution “demands that all states comply with Security Council resolutions regarding the Holy City of Jerusalem, and not to recognize any actions or measures contrary to those resolutions.”
Huh. So the UN thinks it can change U.S. law? Morons. Further, we see the typical Israel Derangement Syndrome/hatred on display. Via Twitchy
That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works. https://t.co/JaCQEemPB5
— Jazz Shaw (@JazzShaw) December 16, 2017
It’s not, because the U.S. could simply veto the resolution in the Security Council. And can utterly ignore any General Body vote.
Excellent, because this will give @nikkihaley another great opportunity to torch the hypocrites in her veto speech. #UN https://t.co/WWliwdNONA
— David Cohen (@DavidBCohen1) December 17, 2017
More: the vote was 14-1, with the U.S. shooting the idiocy down and
Nikki Haley on UNSC vote:“The United States will not be told by any country where we can put our embassy. What we have witnessed here is an insult. It won’t be forgotten. It is one more example of the UN doing more harm than good in addressing the Israeli Palestinian conflict."
— columlynch (@columlynch) December 18, 2017
Read: U.N To Vote On Nullifying U.S. Jerusalem Decision Or Something »
Today’s latest scary prognostication
Rising seas will displace 150 million people by 2100, says climate report
Lands inhabited by more than 150 million people could be submerged in water by the end of this century. That’s according to the latest projections from a group of US researchers.
A new study published in the journal Earth’s Future used the latest information from the Antarctic ice sheet and combined it with existing models on the expected rise in sea levels.
The academics behind the report found that if levels of greenhouse gas emission remain high, the median global average sea-level rise could be 4ft 9ins (1.5 meters) by 2100. Astonishingly, this is double the estimate of 2ft 5ins (736cm) projected by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2014.
Astonishingly, this is over seven times the actual recorded sea rise that was measured using actual measuring instruments, vs computer models.
One has to wonder, if we’re all so doomed, why do all the elites have homes at the sea shore, and keep acquiring more.
Read: Rising Seas Will Displace 150 Million By 2100 Or Something »
…is snow that will soon never be seen on Christmas ever again, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Moonbattery, with a post on some serious gender confused people.
It’s Christmas week on IAFY.
Read: If All You See… »

Happy Sunday! Another gorgeous day in America. The sun is shining, the squirrels are squirreling, Christmas is a bit over a week away. This pinup is by Mayo Olmstead, with a wee bit of help.
What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15
As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets†calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me
Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!
Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list.
Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »
https://twitter.com/WilliamTeach/status/942367577791254528
Yes, we have survived. No zombie outbreaks, no invasions from Mars, people aren’t scrolling through their social media looking for things to be Outraged over at speeds we haven’t seen since dial-up was the only game in town. You know, back when we had no net neutrality, and the loose regulations saw the ‘net go from speeds of under 52kbs to ones in the megabites per second in less than 10 years. I’m running 200mbs. It’s great! But, of course, California (via Jazz Shaw at Hot Air)
(CBS SanFran) California state Sen. Scott Wiener vowed Thursday to introduce a bill that would require net neutrality in California.
Following the Federal Communication Commission’s repeal of net neutrality Thursday, Wiener (D-San Francisco) wrote on a Medium post:
“There are several ways we can bring net neutrality to California. California can regulate business practices to require net neutrality, condition state contracts on adhering to net neutrality, and require net neutrality as part of cable franchise agreements, as a condition to using the public right-of-way for internet infrastructure, and in broadband packages.â€
Net neutrality, a principle that Internet service providers should provide equal access to web content, has been fiercely championed by tech entrepreneurs.
Wiener said he is working with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the American Civil Liberties Union on crafting a bill and said they “are exploring all of these options and welcome additional ideas as we work over the next 60 days to craft the bill and formally introduce it.â€
Looking at Wiener’s statement, his whole idea seems to be (surprise!) massive government intervention in how the Internet runs in California. In controlling the companies who spent billions of dollars crafting the ‘net. In turning the Internet into a public utility. Why does every policy prescription from Democrats revolve around more government control? Because you know this won’t be a light touch. Obamacare started as an idea to make sure that the 30-45 million without health insurance could get it at an affordable price. Look what we ended up with.
Oh, and don’t forget how expensive the insurance became, quite often with deductibles that make said insurance virtually unusable.
As Jazz Shaw points out
California doesn’t have their own internet. (Which is kind of a shame because if they did, the rest of us could simply filter them out.) So if they’re going to impose state-level regulations on entities which operate on a national and, in most cases, international basis, that means that those providers and associated entities are going to need to set up an entirely separate service structure for users inside that one state. (Well… possibly two states, since Washington is talking about it too.) That’s going to cost extra most likely. And who is going to pay those additional costs for special services? If you said the service providers will just suck it up, buy yourself a ticket to Venezuela where such thinking is all the rage.
So, Californian’s will have to pay a whole lot more thanks to Democrats (provided it passes) to complain about Trump’s FCC getting rid of the federal net neutrality. Which, again, since Liberals do not listen and retain anything other than anti-Trump slogans, only killed off the rules initiated in 2015, not the light touch rules put in back in 2005. And were not necessary the previous 15 years.
Crossed at Right Wing News.
Read: California Looks To Do Its Own Big Government Controlled Net Neutrality »
The NYT Team Climate mascot is in place above our new home on the third floor of the newsroom… pic.twitter.com/2MyRJLfmPK
— John Schwartz (@jswatz) December 15, 2017
What happened to your hammer and sickle? https://t.co/Rq0yyZZ4kU
— Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) December 15, 2017
Meanwhile, the San Francisco Chronicle is TDS
Editorial: A global push on climate change thrives without Trump
Though the Trump White House ignores climate change, the rest of the world isn’t neglecting the doomsday issue. A top-level gathering of global leaders in Paris is pushing ahead with plans to cool temperatures and shift economies at a hurry-up pace. (big snip)
The determined spirit can’t disguise the political challenges that remain. The Paris accords reached in 2015 are built on regular progress in ratcheting down emissions in five-year increments. That ambitious direction was to be underwritten by billions in subsidies from wealthy, polluting nations, a circle that no longer includes the U.S.
And full stop: we have global elitists attempting to control economies for their beliefs and redistribute money, which will end up harming the U.S. middle and lower classes. It’s good that Trump isn’t involving the U.S. in this scam.