If All You See…

…is a world flooded from carbon pollution because Other People ate a burger, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Evil Blogger Lady, with a post on Americans being dreamers, too.

Read: If All You See… »

Bummer: Climate Change Pretty Much Ignored During SOTU

This has made many members of the Cult of Climastrology Very Upset. Many are freaking out on Twitter and other social media, as one would expect. Then there are the articles, like this rant by Robinson Meyer at The Atlantic

Trump Doesn’t Mention Climate Change in His State of the Union

President Donald Trump didn’t mention climate change or global warming in his State of the Union address on Tuesday night.

(lots of whining)

Indeed, the president came about as close as possible to mentioning climate change—without saying the magic words. “We have endured floods, and fires, and storms,” he said early in his speech. “We saw the volunteers of the Cajun Navy racing with their fishing boats to save people from the aftermath of a totally devastating hurricane.” Later, he praised Americans’ ability to “push the bounds of science and discovery.”

Those passages would have been sharper, more accurate, and more befitting the scale of the problem if the president recognized the single issue uniting them. But saying the name of that problem is now verboten—a sacrifice to a particularly Republican form of political correctness. And so the country winds into another year, with a federal government that can utter the name of any number of threats to Americans—except the one that is already inundating its shores, scorching its homes, and shaping the lives of its children.

We used to call this “weather” and “nature” before some people decided to use it to blame Mankind and attempt to institute taxes, fees, and Big Government policies that control the lives of citizens.

But, hey, it wasn’t just Trump who ignored Hotcoldwetdry

(HuffPost) The Democratic Party omitted any mention of climate change in its rebuttal Tuesday to President Donald Trump’s first State of the Union address.

In his speech, Rep. Joe Kennedy (D-Mass.) didn’t bring up global warming, sea-level rise or the surge in global greenhouse gas emissions, which threaten to become worse as the Republican White House ramps up fossil fuel production to unprecedented levels.

People paid more attention to his Chapstick.

Even the State of the Union statement issued by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), considered one of the most hawkish Democrats on climate issues, snubbed climate change. He did, however, rail against the Trump administration’s plans to open nearly all federal waters to oil and gas exploration, nothing that the proposal put “the local commercial fishing industry and the Ocean State’s coastal economy in harm’s way.”

However, Comrade Bernie, who had an official position on his presidential campaign website to “bring climate deniers to justice”, a rather ominous call to infringe on the rights of citizens for Wrongthink, did mention it

“How can a president of the United States give a State of the Union speech and not mention climate change?” he said in his own rebuttal. “No, Mr. Trump, climate change is not a ‘hoax.’

Says the guy with three homes who takes lots of fossil fueled trips. Anyhow, there could be a good reason why most ignored the “issue”

Read: Bummer: Climate Change Pretty Much Ignored During SOTU »

‘Climate Change’ Might Possibly Maybe Force Tabasco To Find A New Home Or Something

Not Tabasco! Oh, noes, this is horrible! One of the premiere hot sauces out there! Terrible!

Climate Change Might Force Tabasco to Find a New Home

The nation’s oldest hot-sauce maker may soon be headed to drier ground. For 150 years, Louisiana’s McIlhenny family has manufactured its beloved Tabasco sauce on a geological salt dome called Avery Island that’s just a few miles inland from the Gulf of Mexico. Despite its name, it’s not a true “island,” though the area is surrounded by water, in the form of bayous and swampland, and has served the McIlhennys just fine since their hot sauce business began back in 1868.

Problem is, climate change is making the McIlhennys’ home more precarious by the day: The New Orleans Times-Picayune reports it was once “an ideal spot” for manufacturing, with convenient access to the coast, while 163 feet above sea level and on some 2,200 acres, which protected the site from bad Gulf storms. However, thanks to rising water levels, Avery is now “disappearing at a rapid pace.”

The Darwinist Warmists sure hate that nature changes, eh?

As described by the paper, the situation sounds quite dire:

The marsh protecting the island is losing about 30 feet per year. Saltwater is seeping into the marshes, killing freshwater plants and causing soil to loosen and dissolve. Nearby ship canals grow busier and wider, hastening erosion. Storms are more frequent and hit with more force.

The land is sinking as well. Subsidence drops the Louisiana coast by nearly an inch per year.

Building in a marsh area probably isn’t the greatest place, because conditions change. They aren’t stagnant. And this has nothing to do with man-caused climate change. Climate changes. Things change. That’s the nature of the planet.

What the article forgets to mention in it’s scaremongering is available at the NOLA link in the first paragraph

Demand for Tabasco outpaced the island’s capacity to grow peppers years ago. Seeds are raised there, but now about 99 percent of the peppers are cultivated in Latin America and South Africa. Once shipped to Avery, the peppers undergo a process identical to the one established by Edmund in 1868. The peppers are ground into a salted mash and then stored in reused bourbon barrels for three years. The mash is hauled to the blending facility, where it’s mixed with Tabasco’s third and last ingredient, vinegar.

So, no problems getting Tabasco no or in the future. Just scaremongering Warmists trying to scaremonger.

Read: ‘Climate Change’ Might Possibly Maybe Force Tabasco To Find A New Home Or Something »

Leave It To The NY TImes To Go Barking Moonbat On Trump’s SOTU

I did not see the State of the Union address, as I got home very late from working with a client. I do see that he called for bipartisanship

President Trump appealed for unity in his first State of the Union speech, declaring a “new American moment” even as many glum Democrats in the audience sat on their hands and refused to acknowledge economic gains or calls to honor veterans.

While Trump held firm on his demands for border security and used the grand setting to tout his first-year accomplishments, his call for bipartisanship on the thorny immigration debate met with stonefaced stares from top Democrats such as House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.

Democrats mostly sat on their hands, refusing to stand for the man who escaped from North Korea, a boy who planted flags on veteran’s graves, for the National Anthem, economic successes for Blacks and Latinos, or anything else. There were even some boos. Remember when Democrats and their pet media castigated Joe Wilson for yelling “you lie”? (and he was correct). Anyhow, here’s the unhinged NY Times Editorial Board take, for which they softened the web version of the sub head from “the reaction against his authoritarian impulses, assault on truth and cruelties great and petty has revealed abiding American strengths” to “The reaction against his presidency has revealed abiding American strengths.”

What the President Doesn’t Get About the State of the Union

There’s a level at which — when you consider that the president of the United States has cozied up to a foreign power that tampered with an American election, has repeatedly assaulted the country’s courts and its law enforcement and intelligence agencies, has defended neo-Nazis, has cried “fake news” while provably lying, and has been revealed so credibly to have paid off a porn star that it made news when his own wife chose to attend his biggest speech of the year — it’s hard to believe that the state of the union is strong.

Remember when Obama was caught on hot mike telling Russia’s President Dmitry Medvedev to tell Putin that he’d have more flexibility after the election? Remember when Obama blasted the Supreme Court during a SOTU when they were sitting in front of him? When he said the police “acted stupidly?” Perhaps the Times’ board members missed that Stormy Daniels denied the affair. Let’s continue the fun

Yet Mr. Trump was correct to take note of the continued strength of the American economic recovery. He was right to note that the unemployment rate has continued to drop, and that some big employers have been raising wages. That’s all good. It means that Mr. Trump has done nothing so far to derail the slow, steady recovery that began under Barack Obama nine years ago. If growth continues or accelerates under this president, he will eventually, like Mr. Obama and the Federal Reserve, deserve a lot of credit.

You have to know that if the economy was down, they’d be blaming Trump, not Obama. Since Trump took office, the economy has started roaring, where it was just meandering on during Obama’s years, the worst post-recession recovery since the Great Depression. The Times is so #resist that they can’t even give Trump a bit of credit.

Mr. Trump deserved to take a bow for the degradation of the Islamic State — again, a result of wise continuity with the policy of the previous administration — and for tightening sanctions on North Korea. That’s progress, much as we might wish he’d refrain from bragging about the size of his nuclear button.

That’s about as much of throwing a bone as they can offer, a backhanded compliment.

Mr. Trump can’t be blamed for all the country’s woes. Yet after a year in office, he can now fairly be held accountable, together with the feckless and cynical congressional leadership, for making many of them worse.

Interesting. During Obama’s first term, all bad things were the fault of George Bush. They then go on a five paragraph rant about everything they hate about Trump, too much too excerpt. It’s the kind of unhinged one would witness more at Salon or MSNBC, particularly Excitable Joe Scarborough or Mika, than one would expect from the editorial board of one of the world’s leading newspapers.

How, then, can we say with Donald Trump as president that the state of the union is strong? Here, Mr. Trump deserves much of the credit: So far, the reaction against his authoritarian impulses, assault on truth and cruelties great and petty has revealed abiding American strengths. Despite the strong economy, Americans overwhelmingly disapprove of this presidency. Most Americans say immigrants strengthen the country, according to the Pew Research Center. A profound national reckoning is underway over the status and treatment of women. Voters have streamed to the polls in off-year elections, defying suppression efforts even in Alabama to register their revulsion at Trumpian politics.

What, exactly, does that national reckoning have to do with Trump? The majority of those caught up in sexual harassment and worse have been Democratic Party voters in industries that tend to lean Democrat.

If not exactly “woke,” this country might certainly be described as awakening, with a shot at shedding the civic apathy that has afflicted it for far too long. It is with backhanded gratitude that we might all thank President Trump for that.

Read: Leave It To The NY TImes To Go Barking Moonbat On Trump’s SOTU »

Portland Warmists Look To Push A Sort-Of Carbon Tax On Other People

Isn’t interesting how members of the Cult of Climastrology always want to create a tax for Other People? That they always seem to exclude themselves…well, directly, of course, because these same taxes will end up hitting everyone negatively

(KOIN6)  A coalition led by environmental groups filed an initiative petition with the city of Portland on Jan. 18 to enact a sales tax on large retailers to fund projects that will decrease carbon emissions.

They call their measure the Portland Climate Action Community Benefits Initiative 2018 and are shooting for the November city ballot. The chief petitioner is Adriana Voss-Andreae, chairwoman of 350PDX, an affiliate of an international group working to avert dramatic climate change.

The measure aims to enact a new sales tax of 1 percent on retailers with more than $1 billion in gross revenues and more than $500,000 in Portland revenues. Retailers selling basic groceries, medicines and health care services are exempted.

Right there, it would see a lawsuit because it unfairly taxes certain businesses over others, but, regardless, it would drive those businesses out of Portland proper. For those who can’t, they’ll simply pass that 1% on to customers.

Of course, they’re going to play the redistribution game with Other People’s money

Money collected would be deposited into a Portland Climate Action Community Benefit Fund, which would be disbursed for renewable energy and energy efficiency projects, with a particular focus on projects that benefit low-income people and communities of color.

Portland is totally diverse, you know. Just 6.6% of the population is Black. 6.8 is Hispanic/Latino. Do these Leftist Warmists think that all Blacks and Latinos are poor? Pretty racist attitude, wouldn’t you say?

Read: Portland Warmists Look To Push A Sort-Of Carbon Tax On Other People »

If All You See…

…is a world turning to desert from Other People using ice makers, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Newsbusters, with a post on the perverted show “The Alienist.”

Read: If All You See… »

Doom: ‘Climate Change’ Could Maybe Possibly Bring More Venomous Sea Snakes To California

Everybody Panic!!1!!!!

Could Climate Change Bring More Venomous Sea Snakes to California?

When an extreme El Niño weather pattern raised Pacific Ocean temperatures off the coast of Southern California three years ago, extremely venomous yellow-bellied sea snakes — a creature that had only been seen once before, in 1972 — washed up on three Southern California beaches.

The yellow-bellied sea snake (Hydrophis platurus), a descendant from Asian cobras and Australian tiger snakes, is the most widespread snake species in the world. These snakes spend their entire lives in the water – but normally in warm, tropical habitats.

There have been no additional sea snake sightings on California beaches until this year, and there’s no El Niño weather pattern this time around. On Jan. 11, someone walking along the sands of Newport Beach nearly tripped over a 2-foot-long female sea snake.

Due to climate change and rising ocean temperatures, “the species that respond to that change will be those that are the most mobile,” Greg Pauly, associate curator of herpetology at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (NHMLA), told the Los Angeles Times. “So the big question now is this: Are sea snakes swimming off the coast of Southern California the new normal?”

Since this all about Science, well

It could very well be. On its website, the NHMLA says “the phrase ‘sea snake on a California beach’ may be the new ‘canary in a coal mine’ for climate change.”

This is how science works in Warmist World: something happens, and they immediately trot out Doomsaying without facts.

Read: Doom: ‘Climate Change’ Could Maybe Possibly Bring More Venomous Sea Snakes To California »

Illegal Alien Tells Congress It Must Reject Trump’s Immigration Plan

Newsweek gives Cristina Jiménez a platform to rail against Trump’s immigration plan. Who is she? Well, she’s an illegal alien, one who was brought by her parents from Ecuador when she was 13. She’s the co-founder of United We Dream, an advocacy group for other illegal aliens. She was given DACA status by Obama, an executive order that even Obama said was un-Constitutional. Now, she thinks she can demand that the U.S. government do things her way

CONGRESS MUST REJECT TRUMP’S IMMIGRATION PLAN —IT IS A CRUEL SOPHIE’S CHOICE

Every minute that has passed since Trump’s decision to kill Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, back in September, more immigrants living in this country have become vulnerable to deportation.

More than 16,000 young people have already lost their DACA status.

The Trump administration created the current crisis that Congress must now address.

Really? I’d say it’s the parents of the kids that created the crisis. According to Cristina’s bio, she knew she was illegal back when her parents brought her.

From day one, Trump’s anti-immigrant agenda has ripped families apart and his latest proposal, crafted by political advisor Stephen Miller, pits immigrant youth against our parents and our family members who want to reunite with us and build lives here.

In other words, they know they’re illegal, but they are demanding not only legalization, but the ability to bring all their family members to the U.S., as well as legalization for the parents who brought them illegally. People breaking the law usually only have demands in the movies, not real life.

It’s the definition of divisive. It’s a white supremacist ransom note, and we are ripping it up.

Let me be very clear on what I mean by that: Immigrant youth and our families will not be held hostage by Trump’s racist policies in this political moment.

Guess what, toots? It’s not your choice. You’re here, say it with me, illegally. In contradiction of federal law. You do not get to dictate the terms. And if you keep pushing, you might find that Trump and the GOP move on from dealing with DACA. Why should whiny, demanding people throwing around insults be rewarded? Would you reward a recalcitrant child? No.

How can we accept this Sophie’s choice? Trump is telling us that in order to be safe ourselves, we must watch our parents get deported and see our family members lose the opportunity to be reunited with us. It is cruel, it is wrong and all people of conscience must reject it.

This is where they want it both ways. First they say that they shouldn’t be punished for the sins of the parents, then they want their parents left off the hook. Cristina continues on with her inflammatory language for a while, finally getting to the heart of what she wants

Democrats and moderate Republicans of conscience have the power to pass the dream to get a Dream Act done as part of a federal spending package.

But it must be a clean Dream Act that protects immigrant youth and DACA beneficiaries without harming our families through increased immigration enforcement, deportations and exclusion of immigrants of color from the United States.

In other words, citizenship for Dreamers, and no risk of deportation for their parents who brought them illegally, nor for any aunts, uncles, cousins, that person they knew back in 3rd grade in El Salvador.

It really is this type of attitude that makes many immigration hard-liners like myself who are willing to make some accommodations to say “nope. Never mind. You illegals do not get to dictate the terms, and I don’t appreciate your demands at the same time you are insulting me. So, never mind. Let’s just deport you.”

Read: Illegal Alien Tells Congress It Must Reject Trump’s Immigration Plan »

House Intel Committee Votes To Release Surveillance Memo

This is either going to end with a thud, or it will create a huge issue. Republicans best be right about the memo being “explosive”

(Fox News) The House Intelligence Committee on Monday evening voted to release a classified memo circulating in Congress that purportedly reveals government surveillance abuses.

The vote was announced to reporters by California Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the committee, who called it a “very sad day, I think, in the history of this committee.” The motion passed on a party-line basis, he said.

President Trump now has five days to decide whether he has any objections before the memo can be publicly released.

Last week, a top Justice Department official urged House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes not to release the memo, saying it would be “extraordinarily reckless” and could harm national security and ongoing investigations.

The four-page memo has being described by GOP lawmakers as “shocking,” “troubling” and “alarming,” with one congressman likening the details to KGB activity in Russia.

Those who have seen the document suggest it reveals what role the unverified anti-Trump “dossier” played in the application for a surveillance warrant on at least one Trump associate.

Democrats, of course, are poo pooing the memo, but, then, they’ve been in Trump Derangement Syndrome since even before Trump won the election, and have just gotten worse since. What will the memo show? I guess we’ll wait and see. There are a lot of questions that need answering.

Read: House Intel Committee Votes To Release Surveillance Memo »

Democrats Super New Tax Idea: Charge Higher Taxes For Property Near Subway Stations

Do Democrats sit around all day thinking “what else can we tax?” Probably so

(NY Times) Ever since August Belmont Jr. arranged the financing for a four-track “underground railroad” more than a century ago, the subway has fueled New York City’s economy, delivering workers from homes in distant neighborhoods to jobs in Manhattan and enriching landlords and real estate developers near stations.

Today, with the subway in precipitous decline and the city enjoying an economic boom, some policymakers think the time has come for the subway to profit from the financial benefits it provides, including its considerable contribution to property values.

Proponents point to the Upper East Side of Manhattan, where co-op and condominium prices in a 10-block stretch near the Second Avenue subway have risen 6 percent since it opened in January 2017, according to figures from the Corcoran Group, a large real estate firm. In Manhattan’s main business corridors, from 60th Street south, the benefit of being near a subway adds $3.85 per square foot to the value of commercial property, according to calculations by two New York University economists.

And because the Democratic run government has done a poor job of managing the money to keep the subway in good repair, they feel they need to tax tax tax

The notion that property owners should pay extra for their proximity to the subway is called “value capture” and has long been debated in urban planning circles. Now Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, a Democrat, has made value capture a prominent part of his plan to salvage the subway system by proposing to give the Metropolitan Transportation Authority the power to designate “transit improvement subdistricts” and impose taxes.

Of course, the reality is that those taxes will get passed along, and will, in fact, hit the middle and lower class residents of NYC.

Here’s an idea: use the money already taken from citizens responsibly.

Read: Democrats Super New Tax Idea: Charge Higher Taxes For Property Near Subway Stations »

Pirate's Cove