NY Times: Trump’s Fuel Efficiency Rollback Will Hurt Drivers Or Something

See, in Liberal/Warmist World, everything is bad for citizens without the Helping Hand Of Government at the wheel, as we see Paul Bledsoe, who served on the White House Climate Change Task Force under (serial rapist) President Bill Clinton, bloviate in the opinion pages

Trump’s Fuel Efficiency Rollbacks Will Hurt Drivers

President Trump met with auto industry executives at the White House on Friday, arguing for his planned rollback of fuel efficiency and emissions standards, and telling them he wanted them to build “millions more cars” in the United States.

Let’s assume they would. If they did, any cars they made would also be dirtier and more expensive for consumers to drive without the fuel efficiency and emissions rules that the president wants to discard.

How much more expensive? A draft proposal by the Trump administration that emerged in recent weeks would result in additional fuel costs of “$193 billion to $236 billion cumulatively between now and 2035” depending on oil prices, according to an analysis by the Rhodium Group, a research firm that examines the market impact of energy and climate policy.

And those higher gasoline costs are likely to hurt most the very families President Trump claims to care so much about — the ones living paycheck to paycheck.

The fuel efficiency and tailpipe emission standards targeted by Mr. Trump were designed by the Obama administration and require automakers to meet escalating efficiency standards: 41.7 miles per gallon by 2020, and 54.5 m.p.g. in 2025. (Those numbers represent laboratory measures; on the road, they are equivalent to about 32 and 42 m.p.g., respectively.)

Let’s consider 4 of the most popular 2018 sedans

  • Honda Civic 1.5 liter turbocharged: 35 combined MPG
  • Honda Accord 1.5 turbo: 33 MPG
  • Toyota Corolla: 1.8 liter 34 MPG
  • Toyota Camry 2.5 liter 32 MPG

None are even close, right? But, the standards are about overall car lines, so having hybrids and full electric vehicles kick up the overall number. However, it still means that manufacturers have had to do different things to make each vehicle more and more fuel efficient, which has made them more dangerous, and more costly. At what point do the CAFE standards go beyond helping the consumer and making them either less safe and/or spend way more money?

Here’s the thing: does anyone think automakers will suddenly say “Oh, standards are rolled back, so we’re going to make everything super gas guzzly”? Well, Warmists like Bledsoe apparently do. What is more likely to happen is automakers will keep their current standards, and perhaps attempt to improve on them, while potentially coming out with a few vehicles that aren’t so fuel efficient, because Trump rolled them back to pre-Obama, he didn’t get rid of them altogether.

And having more choice is good for consumers. Think people who drive big V8s do not understand that they pay a lot for gas? Why are Warmists/Progressives against choice? If I want to drive a V8 Challenger, Camero, or Mustang, that should be my choice, not Government’s.

President Trump is pushing to reduce fuel efficiency requirements just as global oil prices rise from $50 a barrel to over $70 — in part because the oil markets are nervous about the president’s decision to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal.

These announced changes to the CAFE standards occurred well before withdrawal for the Iran deal. Leftists just making crap up now.

Given rising oil and gasoline prices, fuel efficiency would seem to be a worthy goal, both for consumers and the environment.

It is, but it should be up to the consumer and companies, not government.

Read: NY Times: Trump’s Fuel Efficiency Rollback Will Hurt Drivers Or Something »

NY Dems Latest Anti-gun Idea: Ban Shooting Sports From Schools

When will NY Democrats give up their armed security at their places of government business?

(Daily Caller) New York Democrat Linda Rosenthal introduced legislation to ban shooting sports from New York schools Friday, claiming the sports “spread gun culture.”

If the legislation is passed, high school shooting teams, including air rifle and even archery clubs, would be disbanded, Time magazine reported on Thursday. These programs can lead to violence, Rosenthal claimed, citing the Parkland shooter’s involvement in the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (JROTC) program before executing his mass killing.

“Schools should not be supporting the spread of gun culture in society,” Rosenthal told reporters. “If parents want their children to have shooting instruction, there are opportunities that have nothing to do with the school.”

Interestingly, if parents object to their children receiving sexual instruction on things like oral, anal, and same gender sex, the schools will shame them. If parents object to the gender confused using the bathrooms, showers, and locker rooms of their children, the school will tell them to pound sand. Unsurprisingly, Rosenthal represents a part of Manhattan, so, she’s probably not familiar with the outdoors activities in a goodly chunk of the state of New York.

She should try taking a stroll through the district she represents, which encompasses the Upper West Side and Hell’s Kitchen, in the wee hours of the morning, and see the real “gun culture” in the Democratic Party run areas, versus how safe she’d be in the more suburban/rural areas.

Also, why does she hate female empowerment, as we switch to the TIme Magazine article

Air riflery is currently the smallest varsity sport in New York state, with 28 teams statewide and 266 participants last year. It has also emerged as a very female-dominated sport, with girls winning 19 of the last 31 state individual air rifle championships.

This small sport led to Jillian Zakrzeski gaining a spot in the Junior Olympics. Rosenthal wants to take these chances away from women. And, yes, it does go after archery clubs, because there’s lots of gun crime being committed with bows and arrows.

Meanwhile

The National Rifle Association filed a lawsuit Friday against New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and the state’s financial regulatory bureau for what it labeled a “blacklisting campaign” aimed at the gun advocacy group.

According to NRA attorney William A. Brewer III, Cuomo and the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) attempted to impede the association’s right to “speak freely about gun-related issues and defend the Second Amendment.”

People like Cuomo may not like Other People having firearms for protection, but, we still have a Constitution, and so does the state of NY.

Read: NY Dems Latest Anti-gun Idea: Ban Shooting Sports From Schools »

Woman Playing Race Card After Traffic Stop Shocked To Learn Of This “Body Cam” Thingy

Everyone wants to be a Victim, some more than others. But, in today’s society, they should remember there are tons of different technologies that may well be recording them. An officer having a body cam is kinda shocking, eh?

South Carolina woman’s claims of being harassed by ‘white cop’ are questioned as new footage emerges

A South Carolina woman who said being pulled over for speeding by a “white cop” was a “traumatic experience” is having her story questioned after police body camera footage from the incident showed a less intense series of events unfolding.

Dawn Hilton-Williams, in a Facebook Live video on April 27, accused a Brunswick County Sheriff’s Office sergeant of racism after she was ordered to sign a summons asking her to appear in court or pre-pay a traffic ticket. The officer said he clocked her going 70mph in a stretch of rural Route 58 in Virginia that has a 55mph limit.

“It doesn’t matter how polite you are, it’s all sick, crazy bullying and the police are ridiculous,” Hilton-Williams says in the 11-minute video, at times wiping tears from her face and speaking in a frightened tone.

But in video footage released Monday by the sheriff’s office, when confronted with the summons – Hilton-Williams immediately starts questioning the officer where there are signs that say the area has a 55mph limit.

Here’s an idea: don’t speed and you won’t get pulled over. I’ve had speeding tickets. I was speeding (got away with it one time, long story). And, yes, I’ve also been pulled over by a jerkoff cop in a city in NJ that is renowned for doing just that (also a long story).

Hilton-Williams, after signing the paperwork, then drove off and took to Facebook Live to blast the officer.

“I have had a traumatic experience and I want the people who are not African-American who know me to really get where we are coming from,” she says. “When I saw the police pull up behind me, the state trooper, I was immediately afraid.”

“This is the area I’m in,” she said, panning the camera around to show the rural roadway. “In the middle of, this kind of stuff. This is where I am, so it’s not like I’m not afraid, because this is where we got lynched.”

Drama queen city. But, you were speeding, honey. Bless your heart. It is despicable to accuse the cop of racism, smearing him because you were breaking the law and he was doing his job.

Fortunately, body cam to refute her baseless allegations.

Read: Woman Playing Race Card After Traffic Stop Shocked To Learn Of This “Body Cam” Thingy »

If All You See…

…is a world turning to desert from too much carbon pollution atmosphere cancer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Other McCain, with a post on equality and paying bills.

Read: If All You See… »

FYI On The F Word

Just a note. I was taking a period look at the spam que, because sometimes things end up there that I want to rescue, and noticed a bunch of comments in the trash bin. They’re there because the F word was in the comments. At least one of the tools used for WordPress, could be Bad Behavior, could be Akismet, or something else, automatically tags that word and right to trash bin. I’d find a way to allow it, but, a lot of actual spam is caught that way. If you use it, and think it’s relevant (I see a couple which would have been), email me and I’ll rescue it.

Anyhow, here’s Brian Stettler vs Donald Trump

https://twitter.com/CuteEmergency/status/993917498696392705

Read: FYI On The F Word »

Ant Hill To Mountain: Simple Case Of Employees Being Fired Turned Into “Disturbing Trend”

This is the kind of idiocy we’re dealing with in today’s society of everyone being a Victim and having to have a National Conversation on everything

A ‘disturbing trend’: Duke president issues statement following coffee shop firing

Three days after two baristas were fired from a coffee shop on Duke University’s campus, President Vincent Price issued a statement linking that clash of cultures – a Duke vice president was offended by rap lyrics playing over the coffeeshop sound system – to other recent racially-tinged incidents on campus, saying they illustrate a “disturbing trend.”

I’m going to skip down into the story to give you more of an idea as to what happened first

On Friday, Larry Moneta, vice president for student affairs at Duke, walked into Joe Van Gogh to purchase some items when he heard music lyrics playing from the speakers that he said were inappropriate.

“I expressed my objections to the staff with whom I’ve always had a cordial relationship,” he said in a statement.

Moneta said he then contacted the director of Duke dining to express his concerns, and that was the end of his involvement.

The two employees working at the time were let go from their jobs on Monday.

Missing from this article is that Moneta heard the F and N words streaming from the Spotify playlist.

(Washington Post) Moneta said in a statement to the News & Observer and the Duke Chronicle on Tuesday that he was “shocked” to hear lyrics that he said were “quite inappropriate for a working environment that serves children among others.” He said he was particularly troubled by the line in the song that goes “I …. her up real good,” using the f-word.

The coffee slinger who interacted with Moneta was black. The other employee, who stayed out of it, was white. Now, should they have been fired? In the absence of other issues, I would say no. Put them on notice that playing garbage music like that in a place of business is inapropriate. They should have known that, but, people do things all the time where they go “huh. You’re right. Should not have done that.” Heck, if it was me, I’d love to crank some heavy metal. But, I wouldn’t, because the business is about the customer. Perhaps there were some other issues that caused the terminations. The company is not saying, which is the correct thing to do.

Of course, this caused protesters to do their thing, protesting and dancing and chanting, along with singing the disgusting lyrics to the song, because these kids are totally mature and stuff. But, we expect this kind of stupid stuff from college kids, and they are kids mentally. Back to the beginning of the original story, with the statement by Duke’s president

When we learn a racial slur has been scrawled on a dorm door, a social media posting has used abhorrent language, anti-Semitic posters have been distributed in Durham, or workers on our campus have been treated unfairly, we feel angry, discouraged, and disappointed. Duke should be a place where these things don’t happen. They are a painful reminder that we have more work to do to make our Duke community the dynamic, diverse and welcoming community of students, faculty, and staff we aspire it to be: a place where our daily challenges are grappling with a new concept, a new idea, or a new way of thinking – and not with how someone has behaved, or how we ourselves have behaved, that has caused others pain or hurt.

Something has to change.

I will simply say that I am deeply sorry that we are not where we want to be as a university. I am, in particular, sorry that the words of one of my senior administrators recently resulted in two individuals working for one of our on-campus vendors losing their jobs; and while I am pleased that the vendor has taken steps to reverse this action, I apologize for the precipitous and unfair treatment these employees experienced. We must do better.

At the same time, we cannot and will not succumb to a rush to judgment that demands instant retribution absent context and deliberation.

So where do we go from here? Having now completed my first academic year as president, I am reflecting on these problems of basic decency, and our legacies of racism, intolerance and xenophobia, that continue to follow us, and indeed all of society. They do not lend themselves to easy answers or quick fixes. But they will continue to plague us unless we address them directly, honestly, in good faith, and with a healthy dose of courage.

This is, quite frankly, beyond stupid. It’s a simple thing. Two employees were fired for playing beyond inappropriate music in a company that deals solely with the public in a public venue. There’s no racism. There’s nothing unfair. There’s no reason to link this to other things like a racial slur on a door or anything else. If I was playing hardcore metal and was fired for doing so, no one would shed a tear and complain about racism and being unjustly fired. People need to get over themselves. And, seriously, this became national news. People need to take responsibility for their own actions, rather than becoming Victims.

BTW, here’s another crazy one making the rounds

You’ll have to read the whole thing, there’s so much stupid that it would require another long post. I have to wonder if this child considered that companies will see this, and go “huh. She might be a big problem if we hire her.” And, if someone actually interviews her, will she pitch a fit when told that the company actually has a dress code that she’s expected to comply with?

Read: Ant Hill To Mountain: Simple Case Of Employees Being Fired Turned Into “Disturbing Trend” »

Connecticut Latest State To Dump Solar Subsidies

State after state is finding that this whole “green energy” and net metering thing aren’t working out too well for the consumer

(Daily Caller) Connecticut is about to become the latest state to reform its expensive net metering program, saving money for the vast majority of electricity customers who do not own a solar installation.

Early Wednesday morning, the Connecticut state House passed Senate Bill 9 — legislation calling for a reduction in the amount of money solar panel owners are compensated for the energy they send back to the grid. The bill already passed the state Senate and outgoing Gov. Dan Malloy is expected to sign. Despite vehement opposition from the solar industry lobby, the bill sailedthrough both chambers of Connecticut’s legislature, passing the state Senate by a vote of 29-3 before passing the House 100-45 in the same week. Malloy, the state’s outgoing Democratic governor, is widely expected to turn the bill into law given his office introduced the measure.

Much similar to programs in other states, net metering encourages solar installation usage by forcing utility companies to purchase excess energy a panel owner sends back to the grid. Utility companies typically must purchase this energy at more expensive retail rates, not wholesale rates. The system is lucrative for solar panel owners who get paid more than their energy is worth, but these costs are essentially passed onto non-net metering customers by way of higher electricity bills.

The non-net metering customers are the vast majority of energy customers, who see their energy bills rise because the energy companies are forced to purchase electricity at the high rates, and that energy is virtually worthless, since it is extra energy not used during that time period and an unnecessary. Since solar is dependent on certain light conditions, it’s unreliable, so the energy companies have to have their usual energy (coal, nuclear, natural gas) which is reliable running at proper peak levels, so the solar is not needed.

If this whole solar thing was working super well, the home owners would simply store the energy for use when it’s not sunny.

Two-thousand-eighteen has not been a good year for supporters of net metering. Connecticut will soon become the latest in a growing number of states that have chosen to reform how the program works. On May 8, the Vermont Public Utility Commission determined the high rates given panel owners was costing other electricity customers too much. The Michigan Public Service Commission reached a similar conclusion in April — as did Maine in 2017.

This is yet another part of the Obama legacy that’s slowly being eroded. Sure, you can’t give him all the credit, because some of this stuff was going on before Obama, but, it really was O’s “green” push that jump started the majority of this scam. Will there be any positive achievements of consequence left? I can think of one.

Read: Connecticut Latest State To Dump Solar Subsidies »

TDS Hot Take: Trump’s Iran Move Is Totally Like The Lead Up To Iraq War

Remember how the media said the same thing about Obama while he slapped sanctions on Syria and made all sorts of threats himself and had his people do the same at the U.M.? Oh, wait. Here’s NY Times editorial cartoonist with his hot take

President Trump’s decision to abandon the Iran nuclear deal and his Iran policy reminded some current and former U.S. officials of the buildup to the March 2003 invasion of Iraq.

Sigh. That link leads to a NY Times article that manages to show Trump Derangement Syndrome and the typical Iraq war derangement

Trump’s Iran Move Reminds Some of Run-Up to Iraq War

Fifteen years after invading Iraq over weapons of mass destruction and ties to al Qaeda that both proved non-existent, the United States is again steering toward a possible confrontation with a Middle East power for suspected work on nuclear weapons and support for terrorism.

U.S. President Donald Trump’s Iran policy sounds hauntingly familiar to some current and former U.S. officials who witnessed the buildup to the March 2003 invasion of Iraq, where sectarian and ethnic fractures and some 5,000 U.S. troops still remain.

More than 4,400 U.S. troops and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis died in the conflict, which many analysts have called one of the major U.S. foreign policy debacles of modern times.

“There are disturbing and eerie similarities” in the misuse of intelligence then and now, said Paul Pillar, who was the top U.S. intelligence analyst for the Middle East from 2001 to 2005.

I’m not going to bother relitigating the reasons for the Iraq War, despite the Times getting it wrong. Been there, done that.

And the other people who said it reminded them of the runup to Iraq are…..wait, that’s it. Mr. Pillar and the NY Times writers are it. And the rest of the screed is why Iran is not like Iraq, while still being TDS.

Read: TDS Hot Take: Trump’s Iran Move Is Totally Like The Lead Up To Iraq War »

Global Warming Is Totally Melting Antarctica From Below Or Something

They’re just making it up in contradiction to reality at this point

Global warming is melting Antarctic ice from below

We all know intuitively that in a warmer world there will be less ice. And, since the North and South Pole regions contain lots of ice, anyone who wants to see evidence of climate change can look there. (snip)

With global warming, both of the poles are warming quite quickly, and this warming is causing ice to melt in both regions. When we think of ice melting, we may think of it melting from above, as the ice is heated from the air, from sunlight, or from infrared energy from the atmosphere. But in truth, a lot of the melting comes from below. For instance, in the Antarctic, the ice shelves extend from the land out over the water. The bottom of the ice shelf is exposed to the ocean. If the ocean warms up, it can melt the underside of the shelf and cause it to thin or break off into the ocean.

A new study, recently published in Science Advances, looked at these issues. One of the goals of this study was to better understand whether and how the waters underneath the shelf are changing. They had to deal with the buoyancy of the waters. We know that the saltier and colder water is, the denser it is.

This was the same UK Guardian August of last year

Scientists discover 91 volcanoes below Antarctic ice sheet
This is in addition to 47 already known about and eruption would melt more ice in region affected by climate change

Of course, they still had to throw in ‘climate change’ scam garbage.

Volcano ‘as powerful as Yellowstone’ MELTS ice beneath Antarctica
A GIGANTIC volcano which could be as powerful as the dreaded Yellowstone is melting Antarctic ice from beneath the surface, Nasa scientists have revealed.

I could keep throwing these links out, but, Warmists wouldn’t care. They’re stuck in their little cult world. One last one from 2014

Surprise, West Antarctic volcano melts ice

Who would have thought? Antarctic volcanoes are hot after all.  Having a volcano under an icesheet makes a difference, and some of the sea level rise blamed on CO2 is more likely to be because 1,000 °C lava is not far from sub-zero ice. Right now, according to scientist Dustin Schroeder and co,  it is as if the Thwaites Glacier in West Antarctic is sitting on a “stovetop burner”.[1]

Only last week I wondered if West Antarctic volcanoes had something to do with the Antarctic warming and pointed out this strange coincidence below where almost all the warming seems to occur over the volcanic area which is part of the hot “Pacific rim of fire”. I also wondered why some parts of the media don’t seem to mention the volcanoes. Wait and see if this story gets picked up. So far, Fox, and Business Insider have it.

One day this scam will be over.

Read: Global Warming Is Totally Melting Antarctica From Below Or Something »

If All You See…

…is sea that will soon, totally soon!, rise up and cover the land, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Daley Gator, with a post wondering if it’s time to embrace the whole cultural appropriation thing.

Read: If All You See… »

Pirate's Cove