Democrat Jay Inslee, Running On ‘Climate Change’, Realizes That No One Really Cares In Practice

In theory, Democrats care about ‘climate change’, so he’s released his own 5 point plan, which is primarily about taking away your use of fossil fuels while he and other big wigs run around the country using a lot of fossil fuels

Jay Inslee unveils 5-point plan to fight climate change

Democratic presidential hopeful Jay Inslee announced a five-pronged plan Monday that’s geared to fight climate change change by ending fossil fuel pollution.

The Washington governor’s plan calls for the end of fossil fuel subsidies, would ban new federal leases for drilling, phase out fossil fuel production, reject new fossil fuel infrastructure and improve corporate climate transparency.

The Democrat’s plan puts climate action at the heart of US. foreign policy, and its goal would be to create 100 percent clean electricity, energy efficient cars and buildings while phasing out all coal plants. It will also create 8 million new jobs in infrastructure, manufacturing and innovation over the next decade, Inslee said.

Most of Inslee’s plans did not work to well while he was actually pretending to be the governor of Washington. Most were shot down in referendums. It is a silly plan, but, then, what would you expect.

But, here’s also Jay

Jay Inslee: ‘I Got a Whole Nother Story to Tell’

On Monday afternoon in the Everglades, Governor Jay Inslee of Washington was on a boat, using his phone to take a photo of an alligator. He was on his way to unveil his latest 2020 campaign initiative: a plan to completely end America’s use of fossil fuels—very on-brand for the Democratic candidate who’s all about climate change. Come Wednesday night, when he takes the stage for the first Democratic debates in Miami, Inslee will try to expand that brand.

Running as the Climate Guy helped Inslee make a splash in a primary field crowded with almost every type of Democrat. He picked a losing fight with the Democratic National Committee over its refusal to host a climate-change-only debate, a fight that has helped him win attention among environmentalists and stick-it-to-the-man enthusiasts alike. But Inslee knows that for as much as primary voters say they care about climate change, he’d probably have trouble getting them to support a single-issue presidential nominee, particularly in a field as diverse as this one.

So Climate Guy knows it’s time to branch out. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts is the only top-polling candidate who’ll be on stage with Inslee Wednesday night, and his campaign believes he has an opportunity to stand out, one that he wouldn’t were he sharing the stage with former Vice President Joe Biden, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, Senator Kamala Harris of California, and South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, who are all slated for Thursday night’s debate.

“Climate change is not a single issue, number one,” Inslee told me, sitting at a picnic table in a park outside Cedar Rapids, Iowa, recently, as he ticked through climate change’s impacts on health, national security, food, and more. “And number two, I got a whole nother story to tell,” he began. “Which is one of the most, if not the most, successful governors—with the most successful economy, with the most progressive successes. I got notches on my belt. I got bills to pass, and jobs I’ve created. And every single thing that the other aspirants have talked about, almost everything I can think of, I’ve done. So every speech they’ve given, I’ve passed a bill. I put somebody to work. I’ve financed a college education. I got the Dreamers paid for. I’ve done criminal justice reform. I’ve even made it safe for composting after you’ve passed from this earth.”

In other words, Jay has realized that this Hotcoldwetdry schitck is not working. In most polls he’s at a whopping 1%. And a guy with his experience would be polling higher, you would think, right? He is a governor. He’s been the Guy In Charge.

But, then, in practice, most Democrats do not care that about ‘climate change’, they want candidates who screech at Trump and push insane policies in an insane manner. Jay is rather mild mannered. Will he start yammering about eliminating college loans debt and medicare for all and amnesty and stuff? Might as well. ‘Climate change’ ain’t working.

Read: Democrat Jay Inslee, Running On ‘Climate Change’, Realizes That No One Really Cares In Practice »

Democrats Badly Divided Over Emergency Aid For Illegals At Border

They caterwaul about how bad the conditions are in the detention facilities, yet, they want to play games with the funding

Emergency Aid for Migrants Badly Divides Democrats

Congress is trying to rush $4.5 billion in emergency humanitarian aid to the southwestern border while placing new restrictions on President Trump’s immigration crackdown, spurred on by disturbing images of suffering migrant families and of children living in squalor in overcrowded detention facilities.

But with a House vote on the package planned for Tuesday, some Democrats are revolting over the measure, fearing that the aid will be used to carry out Mr. Trump’s aggressive tactics, including deportation raids that he has promised will begin within two weeks. Republicans are siding with the White House, which on Monday threatened a veto. They oppose restrictions in the measure that are meant to dictate better standards for facilities that hold migrant children and to bar the money from being used for enforcing immigration law.

Those twin challenges have left the fate of the bill up in the air, even as evidence of deplorable conditions at the border underscores both the urgent need for the money and the bitter rift over Mr. Trump’s policies.

“Democrats distrust this president because we have seen his cruel immigration policies and lawless behavior terrorize our constituents,” Representative Nita M. Lowey of New York, the chairwoman of the House Appropriations Committee, said on Monday evening as she pleaded with fellow Democrats to support the package. “That is why we have language to stop transfers of money for immigration raids and detention beds. But we cannot allow our anger at this president to blind us to the horrific conditions at facilities along the border as the agencies run out of money.”

Funny, the Democrats weren’t concerned when Mr. Obama was doing the same thing. He just had the luxury of not seeing the border being totally over-run with people in caravans demanding asylum, which requires detaining them till the case can be adjudicated. Do Democrats want to let them go with a pinky promise to return? Where will they live then? Lowey is correct, though, in that Democrats should put away their Trump Derangement Syndrome for a few minutes and do the right thing.

Hispanic-American lawmakers are particularly split; some are arguing that it is crucial to get the aid to agencies and outside groups assisting migrants at the border, while others say they will not be complicit in sending any money to the very departments that have carried out Mr. Trump’s harsh initiatives against immigrants.

“I will not fund another dime to allow ICE to continue its manipulative tactics,” Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Democrat of New York, said on Monday evening on her way into the meeting in Ms. Pelosi’s Capitol office.

ICE isn’t the one operating most of the facilities, that would be Customs and Border Control. Further, ICE must be funded by law. But, hey, when will AOC offer to house the illegals herself?

Essentially, Democrats and all their little groups are all over the place on what they want, and

(The Hill) The White House on Monday threatened to veto House Democrats’ proposal on how to meet its request for $4.5 billion in funds to address the influx of migrants on the southern border.

The House and Senate are considering competing bills this week to meet the Trump administration’s request.

While the Senate version is bipartisan, House Democrats are still trying to round up the votes for their bill amid concerns from Hispanic and progressive lawmakers wary of funding the Trump administration’s immigration policies.

In a statement on Monday, the Office of Management and Budget called the House measure a “partisan bill that underfunds necessary accounts and seeks to take advantage of the current crisis by inserting policy provisions that would make our country less safe.”

That statement is well worth the read, and highlights just how loopy the Democrats are.

Read: Democrats Badly Divided Over Emergency Aid For Illegals At Border »

Hotcold Take: Winters Are Colder Because The Earth Is Heating Up

I’m kinda shocked the always excitable Salon is running this as summer begins. It’s usually reserved for winter time, but, hey, there’s been a bunch of late spring snow, so…

From the screed

But will all of this disastrous news make global warming and climate change more difficult to deny? Probably not, because when winter comes, it may be colder than ever, and last longer.

And try to explain this to the denier: the winters are colder — because the planet is heating up.

First, virtually no one is denying that it has gotten warmer since the end of the Little Ice Age. We disagree on causation,

Second, they’re actually arguing that a warming planet will now make winters colder and longer. Remember when they were saying that they would be shorter and not as cold? It’s a cult. It has no resemblance to science.

Read: Hotcold Take: Winters Are Colder Because The Earth Is Heating Up »

If All You See…

…is a sea rising from carbon pollution and encroaching on forests, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is 90Ninety Miles From Tyranny, with a post on banning guns being a slippery slope.

Read: If All You See… »

Slate Spins Wheel And Decides That Deodorant Is Now Part Of The Patriarchy

There are some days I think that Trump should start a big war with Iran, because it would mean that the nutters would stop inventing things to whine about. The thing about Peak Wokeness is that you never get there: the virtue signaling barking moonbats will always be able to find some minor, tiny thing and turn it into a mountain

From the “article“, which is nominally about the rise of natural deodorants, but, goes all woke

The answer is a little bit of both. We don’t need aluminum-free deodorant, but the social implications of products that allow women to sweat are good anyway. Deodorants were first sold in the late 1800s, with antiperspirants following shortly thereafter. But it took a bit of time for the concept of masking and/or stopping sweat to take off. Early marketing campaigns, as journalist Sarah Everts has reported, were designed to make women—and they were first marketed just to women—embarrassed about the entire concept of perspiration. A few years ago, Everts dug up sponsored newspaper stories from an early antiperspirant company called Odorono (that expands to: odor-o-no). They had titles like “The most humiliating moment in my life: When I overheard the cause of my unpopularity among men” (spoiler: it was sweat) and “If you long for romance don’t let your dress offend with ‘armhole odor.’ ”

Nowadays, it’s practically expected that women aren’t supposed to sweat through their armpits, which is why I’ve been using antiperspirants since I was in middle school. Using Clean Queen would be something of a sweating experiment for me, and one I was embarking on during the beginning of a new relationship. He’s a nice guy, but thanks to a literal century of the kinds of ads in the vein of the above, it felt fundamentally unwise. So, I planned my outfits carefully to not show pit stains: a tank top paired with a billowy cover-up, a jumpsuit in a dark color.

Sorry, chickie Shannon Palus, men aren’t expected to sweat through their non-workout clothes, either. And, yes, controlling odor. I use it every day even though I’m not much of a pit sweater, nor do I get stinky (more of a head and foot sweater). Some people need to use it more than others.

So, me and my luxury deodorant are not exactly bucking the patriarchy. Either way, our week together was a little slimy, but overall it exceeded my expectations. I’ve been using antiperspirants for so many years that I was surprised at how little I sweated, and I quickly stopped worrying so much about if my clothing would hide it. Plus, the Clean Queen kept my pits smelling like baking soda, though I’m now curious if I’d even smell that bad with nothing. The best part: I texted the new boyfriend, whom I had spent a significant chunk of my experiment hanging out with, to ask if he had even noticed the switch. A firm “nope.”

Read: Slate Spins Wheel And Decides That Deodorant Is Now Part Of The Patriarchy »

Say, What Will It Take To Win A Green New Deal Or Something

Remember, folks, that the Green New Deal has nothing to do with Socialism nor politics, they just want to save the planet from having a fever

What Will it Take to Win a Green New Deal?

The push for a Green New Deal (GND) that’s become a big topic of political discussion in the US has come north. At the beginning of May 2019, the Pact for a Green New Deal was launched publicly in Canada. It was endorsed by a range of organizations and prominent individuals. Behind the scenes, staff from a number of major NGOs including Greenpeace and Leadnow are playing key roles in the initiative.

The Pact calls the GND “a vision of rapid, inclusive and far-reaching transition, to slash emissions, protect critical biodiversity, meet the demands of the multiple crises we face, and create over a million jobs in the process. It would involve the full implementation of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) including the right to Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), dozens of other pieces of legislation, new programs and institutions, and a huge mobilization calling on the creativity and participation of all of us.”

The Pact sets out “two fundamental principles” for a GND: “1. It must meet the demands of Indigenous Knowledge and science and cut Canada’s emissions in half in 11 years while protecting cultural and biological diversity”, and “2. It must leave no one behind and build a better present and future for all of us.” (snip)

It does matter what the specific GND policies will be – but not only or mainly for the reason that some anti-capitalists think. Some radicals in the US have dismissively criticized the GND championed by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and other Democratic politicians for not targeting the capitalist system itself. In a much more constructive reflection, British socialist Richard Seymour has asked if the GND depends “on magical thinking about technology and capitalism? Are the legislative tools it looks to adequate? Is it internationalist, or can it be? Does it risk further commodifying the natural world?” Seymour suggests “we need the GND plus something else.”

In other words, they want to make sure they target the capitalist system itself. In case you missed it, the link goes to The Socialist Project, which is pretty much as far Modern Socialist as you would think, and was originally published in The New Socialist

It’s more useful to think about a GND in the way McDonald suggests: “what a Green New Deal must do is begin to establish the political and cultural conditions in which this scale of transition becomes possible.” As US socialist Thea Riofrancos puts it (quoting left critic of the GND Jasper Bernes): “‘shifting the discussion, gathering political will, and underscoring the urgency of the climate crisis.’ If, through the vehicle of the amorphous Green New Deal, left forces might achieve these three tasks, that strikes me as an exceedingly important development; not an end in and of itself, of course, but it’s unclear to me how a pathway to radical transformation wouldn’t pass through these three crucial tests of political capacity.”

Put simply, what matters most about a GND is that it can serve as a tool that people can use to start to build a larger and more powerful movement for climate justice. What we need is many more people in motion. Another document that, like the Leap Manifesto of 2015, gets some people talking and influences left politics but doesn’t lead to mass action won’t cut it.

They want to use the manufactured “climate crisis” to institute all their Modern Socialism ideas. That Leap Manifesto is a doozy of far, far, far left ideas, which are actually far, far right ones, since they involve more and more government, moving into the Authoritarian model.

A clearer strategy for winning a GND has been proposed by 350.org’s new Our Time campaign. Our Time aims to mobilize young people “to vote for Green New Deal champions and against politicians in the pocket of Big Oil” in the federal election this fall and then “be ready after the election with a mass movement.”

They want the people who do not really understand Real Life yet, who do not understand the implications of their beliefs, and how they would be giving up their modern lifestyle, money, and freedom to Government.

We’ll need a really powerful movement because we’re not just up against the fossil fuel companies. The banks and other large corporations with significant investments in fossil fuels will also oppose any GND worthy of the name. So too will other capitalists who hate the idea of FPIC, massive public sector spending that doesn’t boost their profits, and a government job guarantee for anyone whose job is lost in a transition to renewable energy. In other words, supporters of a GND are up against the Canadian capitalist class (although some sectors are more hostile than others). We also have to contend with political parties that enthusiastically defend or, in the case of the NDP, accept the system that has us on a path to catastrophic climate change: capitalism.

Nope, this has nothing to do with Socialism at all.

Read: Say, What Will It Take To Win A Green New Deal Or Something »

Surprise? After Trump Delays Deportations Operation Pelosi Calls For Amnesty For Illegal Aliens

President Trump reportedly spent twelve minutes talking with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi about the planned operation to pick up roughly 2,000 illegal aliens who are under final deportation orders as signed by federal judges. He supposedly wanted to give Congress time to get something done on funding to deal with the current crisis at the border. The House and Senate have slightly different ideas on how the $4.5 billion would be allocated, and need to reconcile their two bills. So, of course, we get this garbage

Nancy Pelosi to Donald Trump: Thanks for Halting a Few Deportations, Now Give Us a Giant Amnesty

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi responded to President Donald Trump’s decision to delay the deportations of a few hundred recent illegal migrants by asking for a nationwide amnesty for millions of migrants living in the United States.

“Mr. President, delay is welcome,” she tweeted, adding, “Time is needed for comprehensive immigration reform.”

In recent weeks, Democrats have been stepping up their calls for “comprehensive immigration reform,” usually by praising the 2013 “Gang of Eight” amnesty and cheap-labor bill. Democrat’s use of “comprehensive immigration reform” is shorthand for a political deal that would promise better border security for Americans in exchange for an immediate nationwide amnesty that would provide Democrats at least 10 million new voters in a decade.

Pelosi’s tweet is a direct response to Trump’s tweet

Democrats say they aren’t for open borders, but, they entice people to come illegally, they’re against the Border Patrol, ICE, any border barriers, requiring asylum seekers to show up in court, nor deporting any illegal, even those that are clearly criminals. And they want to give them cheap and easy amnesty, jumping the line that lawful citizenship seekers are waiting in, following the rules, and paying the money.

Oh, and here’s this schmuck

https://twitter.com/ArthurSchwartz/status/1142824856809037824

Read: Surprise? After Trump Delays Deportations Operation Pelosi Calls For Amnesty For Illegal Aliens »

Police Arrested 70 Hotcoldwetdry Protesters Outside Of Evil Carbon Polluting NY Times Building Or Something

Who can blame them? The NY Times building has a huge carbon footprint, and the company itself uses vast amounts of fossil fuels to gather, create, and disseminate their version of the news

Police arrest 70 climate change protesters outside New York Times

Police arrested 70 environmental protesters outside the New York Times headquarters who laid down in the street and climbed onto the building to demand the newspaper start referring to climate change as a climate emergency, police and media reports said.

New York police arrested 67 people and Port Authority police arrested three others, a police spokesman said. Charges were pending.

Protesters blocked the street by lying down in a “die-in” and affixed a banner to the skyscraper in midtown Manhattan saying “climate change = mass murder,” with the word “change” crossed out and replaced with “emergency,” according to pictures posted by the website of 1010 Wins radio.

Another banner was attached to the Port Authority Bus Terminal across the street saying simply “climate emergency.”

Demonstrators chanted “tell the truth,” a reporter for The Guardian on the scene tweeted.

According to 1010 Wins, a spokeswoman for Extinction Rebellion, Eve Mosher, said the group wants the media to report on “the climate emergency” so that “people can start pushing for more radical responses.”

Another protester, Donna Nicolino, told The Guardian she was ready to be arrested because “we want the New York Times as well as all the other media to treat climate change as the crisis it is.”

Yup, these are the American offshoot of the UK created Extinction Rebellion nutters, who apparently think that the NY Times, which has propagated all sorts of climate hysteria through the years, is part of the problem.

Read More »

Read: Police Arrested 70 Hotcoldwetdry Protesters Outside Of Evil Carbon Polluting NY Times Building Or Something »

If All You See…

…is

The blog of the day is The Lid, with a post wondering if you really want you daughter to read Teen Vogue.

It’s ladies on the water week! As always, these posts are open discussion.

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Patriotic Pinup Marina Kmet

Happy Sunday! Another fantastic day in America. Summer is in the air, there’s a hawk that keeps flying around behind my townhouse (which is cool), and the Dodgers keep on winning. And, if you’re going to have a touch of insomnia, it’s great when it happens on a night were you can sleep in. This pinup is by Marina Kmet, with a wee bit of help (and, yes, I know she’s Russia. I’ve hijacked pinups from artists from other countries, as well)

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Powerline discusses the crazy documents about Ilhan Omar’s marriages
  2. Climate Etc. covers climate science’s “masking bias” problem
  3. Ice Age Now wonders when we start burning “witches” to solve ‘climate change’
  4. Adrienne’s Corner notes that Trump is damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t on Iran
  5. American Power covers decriminalizing magic mushrooms in California
  6. Brass Pills notes that almost no straight people want to date the gender confused
  7. Chicks On The Right covers what the father of a man killed by an illegal has to say to AOC on “concentration camps”
  8. Creeping Sharia explains the Muslim Brotherhood’s Muslim Students Association
  9. Datechguy’s Blog re-answers the question of why the left loves Islamism
  10. DC Clothesline covers LGBT people intentionally contaminating the blood supply
  11. Flopping Aces notes pervy Democrats sexually harassing Hope Hicks
  12. Jihad Watch discusses the UK finally arresting rape gang members (who are Muslims)
  13. Just One Minute covers NY’s crazy green new deal
  14. Legal Insurrection notes Anarchists threatening to dox any freshman who joins a Conservative group at UT Austin
  15. And last, but not least, Maggie’s Farm discusses human hazards of conservation

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page (nope, that’s gone, the newest Apache killed access, and the program hasn’t been upgraded since 2014). While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Pirate's Cove