Heartache for Warmists. Though, he does find a way to blame things for blocking all the massive temperature increase that the computer models (snicker) say should be occurring. He has his talking points down pat
(UK Telegraph) The peer, who first warned the Government of the cost of climate change in his 2006 Stern Report, said that for the last decade global warming has remained stable.
“I note this last decade or so has been fairly flat,†he told the Telegraph Hay Festival audience.
He said the reasons were because of quieter solar activity, aerosol pollution in certain parts of the world blocking sunshine and heat being absorbed by the deep oceans.
Lord Stern pointed out that all these effects run in cycles or are random so warming could accelerate again soon.
It couldn’t possibly be that the Sun controls the vast majority of climate, could it, Lord Stern? Instead of this “missing heat ending up in the deep oceans where we can’t measure it” trope? Take heart, Warmists, because he does think that the world temperature will rise around 4C, and that the Government should spend oodles of taxpayer money and put in all sorts of regulations which give government more power.
Interestingly, the cycles he yammers on about tend to prove non-anthropogenic causation.
