Your Tax Dollars At Work: Only 6% Of Federal Workers Come In To Work

So, does this help or hurt the bureaucrats from enacting burdensome regulations on Americans?

Top DOGE Elon Musk, House speaker balk at Senate report showing only 6% of federal workers show up in person on full-time basis: ‘Absurd’

They’re being remote-ly professional.

A paltry 6% of the federal workforce “report in-person on a full-time basis” while almost one-third of federal workers are remote on a full-time basis, in a sharp turn-around from the pre-pandemic era in which only 3% teleworked daily, a report from Sen. Joni Ernst’s office found.

Ernst (R-Iowa), who has long crusaded against the rise in remote federal work, is planning to reveal the fruits of her office’s year and a half inquiry to Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) co-heads Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy during their visit to the Capitol Thursday.

“The nation’s capital is a ghost town, with government buildings averaging an occupancy rate of 12[%],” Ernst wrote in the blistering report. “If federal employees can’t be found at their desks, exactly where are they?”

How many can we promote to customer? If they do not want to do their jobs, well, it’s time to terminate. And this goes with supervisors all the way up the food chain who fail to make the employees come in. You can’t seriously hold them accountable if you rarely see the employees and cannot watch them work.

The Hawkeye State senator concluded that “taxpayers are getting ripped off” and claimed that her constituents were troubled by the lack of responsiveness from various government entities such as the Social Security Administration, the Food and Drug Administration, and more

The report rattled through a handful of anecdotes to describe the lack of competence from the federal government.

She cited an example of a whistleblower report at the FDA that was unread for months warning about bacteria spreading in baby formula, which ultimately culminated in a national shortage back in 2022.

We’re forcibly having money taken from our paychecks to cover the operations of the federal government and the employees aren’t providing the service we’re forcibly paying for.

To further her point about taxpayers “getting ripped off,” Ernst cited findings that some federal workers are cashing in on higher pay rates from localities where they are not actually working.

“My audits are finding as many as 23[%] to 68[%] of teleworking employees for some agencies are boosting their salaries by receiving incorrect locality pay,” her report found. “Some employees live more than 2,000 miles away from their office and one ‘temporary’ teleworker collected higher locality pay for nearly a decade.”

That seems like a little charge called “defrauding the federal government.” Perhaps it’s time to start prosecuting. After terminating.

Read: Your Tax Dollars At Work: Only 6% Of Federal Workers Come In To Work »

Lead In Gas Made People Dumb And Crazy Or Something

This isn’t quite a climate doom article, but, the underlying thread is that Fossil Fuels Are Bad (even though NBC News and Warmists use a lot themselves)

Lead in gasoline tied to over 150 million excess cases of mental health disorders, study suggests

Exposure to lead in gasoline during childhood resulted in many millions of excess cases of psychiatric disorders over the last 75 years, a new study estimates.

Lead was banned from automobile fuel in 1996. The study, published Wednesday in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, looked at its lasting impact in the U.S. by analyzing childhood blood lead levels from 1940 to 2015. According to the findings, the national population experienced an estimated 151 million excess mental health disorders attributable to exposure to lead from car exhaust during children’s early development.

The exposure made generations of Americans more depressed, anxious, inattentive or hyperactive, the study says.

Interesting. But, most lead was taken out of gasoline voluntarily by 1986. For one thing, lead destroyed catalytic converters. The petroleum companies also knew lead was bad, and there was very few leaded gasolines by the mid-1970s in the U.S.. Say, I wonder what the dangers of all these precious metals like lithium in EVs will be?

The researchers — a group from Duke University, Florida State University and the Medical University of South Carolina — found that the exposure also lowered people’s capacity for impulse control and made them more inclined to be neurotic.

Lead-associated mental health and personality differences were most pronounced for people born between 1966 and 1986, according to the study. Of that group, the greatest lead-linked mental illness burden was for Generation Xers born between 1966 and 1970, coinciding with peak use of leaded gasoline in the mid-1960s and mid-1970s.

Horseshit. Gen X is a pretty darned stable generation. I’d suggest that removing lead has created more of a problem with Millennials and GenZ, who seem batguano wackadoodle, always yammering about needing mental health days and being traumatized by having to do simple homework and their jobs.

“Studies like ours today add more evidence that removing lead from our environment and not putting it there in the first place has more benefits than we previously understood,” Reuben said.

In fairness, all that lead was actually bad for people, just like asbestos. But, baby boomers and Gen X are a hell of a lot more mentally stable than the follow on generations.

Reuben, who was the lead author of that study, said the new research “doesn’t create new information about whether lead causes harm, nor do we say this is a study that proves causation — we’re really just taking existing evidence and applying it to the whole U.S. population.”

So, we already knew lead was bad, and have already mostly banned it. So, what was the point of the study?

I wonder, though, what will a study in 20 years will say about the COVID vaccines, masking, and all the Crazy that came with the over-reaction to the Chinese coronavirus? How it stunted growth, made people mental messes, and such?

Read: Lead In Gas Made People Dumb And Crazy Or Something »

If All You See…

…are horrible pigs and their massive carbon footprints, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Gates Of Vienna, with a post wondering if Trump will support the Greater Idaho movement.

Read: If All You See… »

Dumbest Supreme Court Justice Says Dumb Things During Gender Transition For Kids Hearing

Is she this dumb or this brainwashed into the Progressive cult?

Supreme Court justice sparks social media fire storm for her comments on gender transitions for minors

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was slammed on Wednesday after she compared a Tennessee law banning gender transitions for minors to past laws banning interracial marriage.

Jackson and the other justices heard over two hours of oral arguments during the U.S. v. Skrmetti case, which involves the constitutionality of state laws banning gender transition medical procedures for minors.

U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar argued that state laws have the effect of “sex discrimination,” since the minor’s gender is key when determining specific medical treatments for those seeking to transition.

Prelogar is a wackjob, as well

After Prelogar’s remarks and exchanges with the other justices, Jackson said that she saw a “parallel” between U.S. v. Skrmetti and the landmark Loving v. Virginia case in 1967.

“Interesting to me that you mentioned precedent, because some of these questions about sort of who decides and the concerns and legislative prerogatives, etc., sound very familiar to me,” Jackson said. “They sound in the same kinds of arguments that were made back in the day—50s, 60s—with respect to racial classifications and inconsistencies. I’m thinking in particular about Loving v. Virginia, and I’m wondering whether you thought about the parallels, because I see one as to how this statute operates and how the anti-miscegenation statutes in Virginia operated.”

Jackson also said there was a “potential comparison” between the Loving case and Skrmetti and wondered if Virginia could have banned interracial marriage by following Tennessee’s reasoning.

Got that? She compared banning giving children all sorts of drugs and mutilating their bodies to banning interracial marriage. Now, just imagine a President Harris packing the Court with a bunch of barking moonbats like KBJ.

Oh, and

How did it become so important to mutilate children to Democrats?

Read: Dumbest Supreme Court Justice Says Dumb Things During Gender Transition For Kids Hearing »

NY Times Is Upset Trump Will Have Enormous Power Over Climate (scam) Action

I’ve been told that elections have consequences

Trump Will Have Enormous Power Over Climate Action. Here’s Why.

Why? Because he’s president is my guess

Walking away from treaties. Redrawing the boundaries of national monuments. Repealing pollution regulations.

As Coral Davenport and Lisa Friedman reported, when Donald Trump returns to the White House next month, he is expected to unleash a series of executive actions and other moves that will radically overhaul America’s approach to energy, the environment and climate.

Shockingly, people knew this when they voted for him. A lot of people voted for him to do exactly this. Why can’t Warmists practice what they preach and leave the rest of us alone.

Some of the moves have been well telegraphed. Trump intends to pull the United States out of the Paris climate accord, as he did during his first term. He is also likely to open up lands in the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments to drilling and mining. And he is planning to repeal parts of the Inflation Reduction Act that benefit electric vehicles.

I can see Trump leaving the tax rebates alone, but, taking a chainsaw to the EV mandate. He’s said it many times: if you want one, get one. Government should not force you to get one.

Trump is able to make all of these changes because, in a government designed to have checks and balances, modern-day presidents have an unusual amount of autonomy to shape climate and energy policy.

Suddenly the NY Times is not happy with the Unilateral President. They were constantly blowing a gasket over this when Bush43 was president, but, had no problem when Obama and Biden were in office. Perhaps Biden shouldn’t have gone so far in his use of executive power that allows Trump to roll it back.

During Trump’s first term, he used executive actions to undo much of President Barack Obama’s climate work. President Biden then followed suit, using executive actions to reinstate some Obama policies.

This tit-for-tat exchange has left the United States with a scattershot approach to climate policy during a decade when the effects of global warming have become increasingly clear.

Hopefully Trump will buckle down and forget about all the stuff he did in his first term and just focus on getting things done, like crushing the climate cult in the federal government.

Read: NY Times Is Upset Trump Will Have Enormous Power Over Climate (scam) Action »

Too Good To Check: Biden Regime Discusses Pre-Emptive Pardons For Certain People

Being the Biden regime this is probably happening. Whether they will do it, that’s the big question

Biden White House Is Discussing Preemptive Pardons for Those in Trump’s Crosshairs

President Joe Biden’s senior aides are conducting a vigorous internal debate over whether to issue preemptive pardons to a range of current and former public officials who could be targeted with President-elect Donald Trump’s return to the White House, according to senior Democrats familiar with the discussions.

Biden’s aides are deeply concerned about a range of current and former officials who could find themselves facing inquiries and even indictments, a sense of alarm which has only accelerated since Trump last weekend announced the appointment of Kash Patel to lead the FBI. Patel has publicly vowed to pursue Trump’s critics.

The White House officials, however, are carefully weighing the extraordinary step of handing out blanket pardons to those who’ve committed no crimes, both because it could suggest impropriety, only fueling Trump’s criticisms, and because those offered preemptive pardons may reject them.

If they’ve committed no crimes then why do they need pardons? Perhaps Democrats shouldn’t have tried the Lawfare scheme against Trump and others.

Those who could face exposure include such members of Congress’ Jan. 6 Committee as Sen.-elect Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and former GOP Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming. Trump has previously said Cheney “should go to Jail along with the rest of the Unselect Committee!” Also mentioned by Biden’s aides for a pardon is Anthony Fauci, the former head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases who became a lightning rod for criticism from the right during the Covid-19 pandemic.

The West Wing deliberations have been organized by White House counsel Ed Siskel but include a range of other aides, including chief of staff Jeff Zients. The president himself, who was intensely focused on his son’s pardon, has not been brought into the broader pardon discussions yet, according to people familiar with the deliberations.

Hmm

Hunter can be compelled to answer questions for the time period covered in the pardon, from January 1, 2014 thru December 1, 2024. He cannot be prosecuted for crimes committed during that time period, so, if people want to put him on the stand he must answer. For people like Fauci, he would be required to answer any and all questions about COVID without the ability to take the 5th. Sure, he would be one of the main targets, but, we’d find out quite a bit about what he did and what others did. And, if he lies, well, that’s a criminal offense not covered by the pardon.

It would be tougher with Schiff, since he is still elected, but, Cheney is now a private citizen, and should be hauled up in front of Congress to answer questions. Republican prosecutors should haul her in to court to answer questions.

Read: Too Good To Check: Biden Regime Discusses Pre-Emptive Pardons For Certain People »

Carrboro, NC Sues Duke Energy Over Climate Crisis (scam)

Half of the energy production from Duke Energy in North Carolina comes from nuclear. The rest is coal and natural gas and a smattering of solar

Small North Carolina town sues energy ‘Goliath’ in historic climate action

A small North Carolina town has launched the nation’s first-ever climate accountability lawsuit against an electric utility.

The litigation, filed by officials from Carrboro, North Carolina, on Wednesday morning, accuses Duke Energy of waging a “deception campaign” to obscure the climate dangers of fossil fuels. Those efforts resulted in delayed action to curb planet-heating pollution, which has pushed up the costs of climate action today, the lawsuit says.

“When you’re dealing with something like the existential threat of climate change, that requires us to make bold moves,” said Carrboro’s mayor, Barbara Foushee, who helped bring the suit.

The litigation follows a November report from the non-profit research group Energy and Policy Institute, which found some of the utility companies that comprise today’s Duke Energy Corporation – including Duke Power, Carolina Power & Light, and Public Service Indiana – were cautioned about the climate crisis decades ago.

“Although Duke has understood the dangers of climate change for decades, the company actively participated in a far-reaching, decades-long campaign to deceive the public and decision-makers about these dangers,” the suit says.

OK, so, what will Carrboro do for energy? Has the town invested in solar and wind? How will everyone get to work in Durham, Chapel Hill, and Raleigh (Carrboro is directly to the west of Chapel Hill and just to the southwest of Durham, so, it’s no surprise it is full of Warmists)? There are 5 gas stations (listed) in Carrboro: will they be banned? Will the city stop using fossil fuels for their operations?

The town, which sits about 20 miles (32km) south-west of Durham, is seeking damages for the climate-fueled costs of adapting roads and infrastructure to increased flooding, and for increased energy costs.

“Those costs could add up to millions, many millions,” said Crystal.

The exact amount the case could yield in damages is unclear.

“We’re content to let a jury of our peers determine what we get,” said Foushee.

Ah, so, it’s a shakedown. Too bad Duke won’t say “we will not provide energy during litigation.”

Read: Carrboro, NC Sues Duke Energy Over Climate Crisis (scam) »

If All You See…

…is an island that will soon die from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is 90Ninety Miles From Tyranny, with a post on the mystery box.

Read: If All You See… »

SCNY Mayor Adams Wants Criminal Illegals Deported

Perhaps it wasn’t the best idea of the Biden-Harris administration to go after Adams in the same way they’ve gone after Trump? Because now he’s apparently had an epiphany and thinks that having criminal illegals in his city is a Bad Idea

Mayor Adams wants migrants charged with crimes deported from NYC in major shift as he dares progressives to ‘cancel me’

Americans before illegalsCommit a crime, get deported before doing the time.

Mayor Eric Adams said Tuesday that he’s open to deporting migrants from New York City who have been charged with crimes — a shift from his past stance of waiting for convictions before shipping off immigrant criminals.

Adams said he soon plans to meet with President-elect Donald Trump’s new “border czar” Tom Homan on the incoming administration’s plans to potentially deport accused migrant criminals.

“My position is people who commit crimes in our city, you have abdicated your right to be in our city and I am open to figure out the best way to address that,” he said. (snip)

He added: “Those who are here committing crimes, robberies shooting at police officers, raping innocent people, have been a harm to our country.”

Hizzoner contended many progressives in this era of “cancel culture” have been afraid to put their foot down on deporting criminal immigrants.

“Cancel me, because I’m going to protect the people of this city,” he said.

That is a heck of a switch. What brought this on? Has he truly had a change of heart? Is this a change because the Biden-Harris admin came after him? Was he or someone he knows a victim of crime by an illegal alien? Of course, he’s only talking about going after illegals who committed crimes other than crossing the border illegally, so, that leaves a lot of illegals in Sanctuary City New York who he would seemingly protect. Will Adams allow the NYPD to assist with picking up illegals who weren’t gang members, felons, rapists, murderers, thieves? You know most cops would want to call ICE.

Maybe it’s the cop in Adams who wants those who are actual criminals, and never should have been allowed into the US, to pay the price, since Adams was an NYPD captain. Maybe he sees all the criminality in the streets of SCNY. The prostitution, the theft, the assault, the constant parties and activities that cause issues for the residents of SCNY.

Obviously, this has set the pro-criminal illegals off

(UK Guardian) Immigration advocates condemned the mayor’s comments and called for an apology. Adams is “ripping a page from [Donald] Trump’s playbook, stoking fear and spreading disinformation”, said Murad Awawdeh, president and CEO of the New York Immigration Coalition.

“We should be able to expect that the mayor of New York City has a basic understanding of the constitutional rights of the people he serves,” Awawdeh added.

The city’s public advocate, Jumaane Williams, posted on X that Adams’ comments “scapegoat migrants arriving in our city for his own failure to support policies that benefit New Yorkers”.

“He denigrated immigrants and non-citizens as unworthy of basic rights,” Williams said.

They do realize they are talking about migrants/illegals who committed crimes, right? Serious crimes that hurt other people, right? Is this the hill they want to die on? Do they think most Americans will support the position of protecting criminals from deportation?

Read: SCNY Mayor Adams Wants Criminal Illegals Deported »

A Growing Rat Problem Is Probably Your Fault

See, the problem couldn’t be caused by unsanitary conditions in Democrat run cities, nope, it has to be due to you driving a fossil fueled vehicle and eating meat

Hearing more about rats? Climate change could be to blame.

Rats! New York residents have long had a toxic neighborly relationship with the notorious rodents, and in the city of Ithaca the pest problems seem to be getting more noticeable.

While city and county officials say there has not been a significant increase in reports of rodents, anecdotes traveling via word-of-mouth and online on platforms like Nextdoor claim there has been a rise in rat encounters locally. A few residents have shared hair-raising stories of rodents scurrying through apartments in Ithaca without much sense of what to blame, particularly as the weather cooled in late summer.

But the seasonal change didn’t bring as much cold weather as it typically would. One local expert said the 50-degree days Ithaca saw as late as mid-November this year may have something to do with the seeming uptick.

In Ithaca, warming winters improve rats’ survivability through the cold months, leading to higher reproductive rates in the spring, said Matt Frye, a rodent and structural pest specialist for Cornell University. Frye works with the pest management industry as well as state and federal regulators to address pest problems in or around buildings.

“If we have warmer winters, we have better survival of rat populations through the winter, which means more individuals that are around in the spring, when they really have a peak of reproduction,” Frye said.

See? Your fault. Even though this has happened numerous times during the Holocene.

Temperatures and climate play a role, but there are other factors at play as well. An abundance of food sources can also attract rodents — typically in the form of mismanaged waste or poorly secured animal food, especially in agricultural settings.

“Rats are opportunistic omnivores, which means they take advantage of whatever they can find,” Frye said.

So, basically garbage in the streets. Nope, still your fault.

Read: A Growing Rat Problem Is Probably Your Fault »

Pirate's Cove