Wait, are we allowed to call people a “Karen” nowadays? Isn’t that mean and racist or something? Technically, wouldn’t they all be Susans, except for Fauxahontas?
No Matter Who Biden Picks, His Running Mate Will Be A ‘Karen’
We’re still at least a month away from Joe Biden announcing who his running mate will be for the 2020 election. It’s hard to tell which way he’s leaning, but no matter who he chooses, it will be “Karen.â€
Applying “Karen†as a pejorative is not as fresh as it might seem. Some uses of the name to describe a spiteful, unpleasant woman go back maybe as far as three decades. But the name has been more widely used as a cultural meme in recent months.
With apologies to those named Karen but aren’t “Karens,†a “Karen†in 2020 is, “an entitled, obnoxious, middle-aged white woman,†says dictionary.com. Wikipedia says a Karen “displays aggressive behavior when she is obstructed from getting her way.†She often wants to “speak to the manager†because it’s her nature to complain, hector, and rage. During the pandemic, we’ve seen Karens all over, screeching and nagging about masks, social distancing (both for and against it and on occasion taking both sides simultaneously), and any conduct she doesn’t agree with.
A Karen is a tattletale and a snob, mean girl who got older but didn’t grow up. And her defining traits, bullying, a desire to subjugate others, and rank hypocrisy, fit snugly with progressive-left politics.
The I&I editorial goes on to note the Karen-ness of the possible Biden running mates, such as
Sen. Elizabeth Warren. Maybe the most Karen of them all. Given the pulpit of a vice presidential candidate, and, Heaven help us, possibly the soapbox of the vice presidency, she will constantly howl about economic inequality, Wall Street, profit, and just about any principle that has made America the exceptional nation it is.
“She is a nag. A scold. An ideologue,†law professor Michael Greve wrote in 2012 when Warren was running for U.S. senator in Massachusetts. “An advocate of a nanny state beyond a Swedish socialist’s wildest imagination. A bureaucratic Bruegel who paints an America of victims — pathetic figures in a landscape of unremitting hostility. Also, professor Warren is an economic idiot.â€
And Kamala Harris
“As California attorney general, she and her staff fought to uphold wrongful convictions and prevent potentially exculpatory evidence from coming to light (as has been well documented),†the Washington Monthly reported last year.
And while she “sells herself as a girl from Oakland who grew up to fight powerful interests,†it’s been revealed “that Harris relied on San Francisco elites and cushy appointments from her then boyfriend, former San Francisco mayor Willie Brown, to power her political rise.â€
Also discusses are Amy Klobutcher and Gretchen Whitmer. What about the other potentials? Could Stacey Abrams be a “Karen”?