NY Times, Obama Admin. Expose Secret Cyberwarfare Program Against Iran

Surely, everyone could guess that the United States was involved in the cyber attacks on Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Just like we can all guess that Iran is looking to create a nuclear weapons program, not use those reactors for peaceful energy production. Fortunately, the NY Times and the Obama administration are there to make sure that the guy running for re-election continued and expanded the program President Bush started

Obama Order Sped Up Wave of Cyberattacks Against Iran

See? He’s awesome!!!!!!!1!!!!!

From his first months in office, President Obama secretly ordered increasingly sophisticated attacks on the computer systems that run Iran’s main nuclear enrichment facilities, significantly expanding America’s first sustained use of cyberweapons, according to participants in the program.

There’s that pesky “secret” word. You know, a program that should not be confirmed.

Mr. Obama decided to accelerate the attacks — begun in the Bush administration and code-named Olympic Games — even after an element of the program accidentally became public in the summer of 2010 because of a programming error that allowed it to escape Iran’s Natanz plant and sent it around the world on the Internet. Computer security experts who began studying the worm, which had been developed by the United States and Israel, gave it a name: Stuxnet.

Yeah, it was a real tough call to continue a program put in place by his predecessor. Oh, and when a secret program is given a code name, it’s kinda supposed to be kept secret.

Told it was unclear how much the Iranians knew about the code, and offered evidence that it was still causing havoc, Mr. Obama decided that the cyberattacks should proceed. In the following weeks, the Natanz plant was hit by a newer version of the computer worm, and then another after that. The last of that series of attacks, a few weeks after Stuxnet was detected around the world, temporarily took out nearly 1,000 of the 5,000 centrifuges Iran had spinning at the time to purify uranium.

Brave, Brave Sir Obama! Look at how awesome he is!!!!!!!! Gutsy!

This account of the American and Israeli effort to undermine the Iranian nuclear program is based on interviews over the past 18 months with current and former American, European and Israeli officials involved in the program, as well as a range of outside experts. None would allow their names to be used because the effort remains highly classified, and parts of it continue to this day.

“Highly classified.” But, there’s an election to win.

Mr. Obama, according to participants in the many Situation Room meetings on Olympic Games, was acutely aware that with every attack he was pushing the United States into new territory, much as his predecessors had with the first use of atomic weapons in the 1940s, of intercontinental missiles in the 1950s and of drones in the past decade. He repeatedly expressed concerns that any American acknowledgment that it was using cyberweapons — even under the most careful and limited circumstances — could enable other countries, terrorists or hackers to justify their own attacks.

Even The Politico can make the connection to what is a very long article (5 webpages, more like a Sunday front page article) which features the tag line at the bottom “This article is adapted from “Confront and Conceal: Obama’s Secret Wars and Surprising Use of American Power,” to be published by Crown on Tuesday.”

One of the staples of Mitt Romney’s foreign policy critique of the president has been that Obama has stood by passively and allowed Iran’s nuclear program to advance. Along with the Times’s story on the Obama administration’s “kill list,” this is the second report this week that would tend to reinforce the president’s politically valuable image as an aggressive war-on-terror leader. Of course, the trouble for Obama is, this probably isn’t the kind of thing you get to talk about at the next campaign stop, and it’s hard to say if this information will end up getting amplified to the point that it matters in electoral terms.

Fortunately, the Obama administration is there to expose highly secret code-named programs to the world for political purposes.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: NY Times, Obama Admin. Expose Secret Cyberwarfare Program Against Iran »

Greenest President Evah! Flies Barber In From Chicago Every 2 Weeks Or So

Via NoTricksZone we see that Obama cares more about getting his hair cut than his carbon footprint

Not only does he not feel bad about the tab taxpayers have to pick up for his haircuts, President Obama obviously also does not care much about the massive carbon footprint his haircuts are leaving on our planet which, we are told, is tipping precariously.

With each passing day, Barack Obama is looking more and more like the Imelda Marcos President.

German public radio here has a gossip report on how the world’s most likable Commander-in-chief gets his haircut, and about the cool dude who trims his hair. The President is a man of the common people, the report tells its listeners. He hangs out with regular folks, like his barber for example. Obama’s Chicago barber, who goes by the name Zariff, has been cutting the Chief Executive’s hair 17 years.

It’s no wonder he avoids talking about climate change as of late, what with his barber taking unnecessary fossil fueled flights every 10-14 days.

Read: Greenest President Evah! Flies Barber In From Chicago Every 2 Weeks Or So »

If All You See…

…is an evil fossil fueled plane, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is American Power.

Read: If All You See… »

Nanny Bloomberg Wants To Ban All Large Sugary Drinks

Having solved all of NYC’s problems, Bloomberg continues to go after Other People’s lifestyles

(CNBC) New York City plans to enact a far-reaching ban on the sale of large sodas and other sugary drinks at restaurants, movie theaters and street carts, in the most ambitious effort yet by the Bloomberg administration to combat rising obesity.

The proposed ban would affect virtually the entire menu of popular sugary drinks found in delis, fast-food franchises and even sports arenas, from energy drinks to pre-sweetened iced teas.

The sale of any cup or bottle of sweetened drink larger than 16 fluid ounces — about the size of a medium coffee, and smaller than a common soda bottle — would be prohibited under the first-in-the-nation plan, which could take effect as soon as next March.

The vast majority of bottled drinks, at least for soda, tend to be 20oz nowadays. This wouldn’t apply to sales at grocery and convenience stores.

“Obesity is a nationwide problem, and all over the United States, public health officials are wringing their hands saying, ‘Oh, this is terrible,’ ” Mr. Bloomberg said in an interview on Wednesday in the Governor’s Room at City Hall.

“New York City is not about wringing your hands; it’s about doing something,” he said. “I think that’s what the public wants the mayor to do.”

Do they? Or would they prefer dealing with crime and drugs?

Original story from NY Times, who appear to be cheerleading, but will be shocked when it effects themselves.

Wizbang: “New YorkCity –Where You Can Drink 23 Hours A Day, But Soon You Won’t Be Able To Buy A 24Ounce Coke”. And hookers and p0rn.

Even far left Booman Tribute finds this a step too far.

Read: Nanny Bloomberg Wants To Ban All Large Sugary Drinks »

England Considers Slapping Green Drivers With Fees And Taxes

One of the results of people going “green” when it comes to driving is that these vehicles use less gas, meaning that there is less tax collected. I discussed this same thing happening in the USA in terms of money lost from the use of hybrid, electric, and fuel efficient vehicles last November. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with going “green” by driving more fuel efficient vehicles. It saves you money. But, it annoys the government, because they receive less tax money, and God forbid they have to learn to do more with less. And now Britain is having serious conversations intent on Doing Something

(Telegraph) The Daily Telegraph has learnt that government officials have begun private discussions with the motoring industry and drivers’ groups about an overhaul of the Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) rules.

The talks come as ministers try to prevent a fall in tax revenues as more motorists choose smaller, cleaner cars that incur a lower rate of duty. Labour has accused the Coalition of planning a “stealth tax” on drivers, effectively punishing them for going green.

Ministers say that while they have not finalised their plans, changes may be necessary to ensure the “sustainability of the public finances”.

One option being considered would replace the annual tax on cars with a one-off up-front charge on new vehicles when they are sold.

It’s not just gas tax fees that are dropping

Annual road tax for cars ranges from zero for those with the lowest CO2 emissions — which include electric and hybrid cars — to more than £200 for those with larger and less efficient petrol and diesel engines.

VED raises almost £6 billion a year for the Treasury, but official forecasts show that the revenue from the tax will fall as more people chose to drive low-emission cars.

So, they put in place these “carbon” taxes expecting to nail the citizens and put more money into the government coffers along with making people change their behavior, and are upset when people change their behavior resulting in less taxes.

To make up the shortfall would cost every British motorist about £20 a year ($30US). Not a whole lot. But, these taxes would seem to be aimed at those with more fuel efficient vehicles. One of the ideas is to simply add a large fee on to the price of purchasing a vehicle. No good deed goes unpunished. And it’s hilarious when government decrees designed to change behavior cause government to freak out over having less money because people actually change their behavior.

Read: England Considers Slapping Green Drivers With Fees And Taxes »

Politico Annoyed By Republicans Attacking Obama Admin. Stammering

The Politico claims that the GOP emails targeting the Obama administrations Solyndra deal has annoyed Democrats. The only problem is, they can only name one Democrat who represented failed candidates. The article is surely meant to simply show that the RNC are just big meanies and schoolyard bullies

Republicans are hammering Democrats for stammering — a bit of election-year bullying that the recipients think is a little, well, uh, childish.

In a series of emails to reporters over the last couple of days, the Republican National Committee has hit White House spokesman Jay Carney and Obama deputy campaign manager Stephanie Cutter for their delivery as much as their substance on questions involving Solyndra and Bain Capital.

Asked on Tuesday how the president’s view of Solyndra — that some investments pan out and others don’t — differs from Mitt Romney’s defense of his time as the chief of Bain, Carney said: “Look … there, there, there is the … the … difference in that, your overall view of what … huh, your responsibilities are as president and what your view of the economic future is,” according to a transcript sent out by the RNC.

Cutter, asked a similar question Wednesday by Chuck Todd on MSNBC’s “Morning Rundown,” gave what the RNC termed an “agonizing 104 second answer” that prompted Republicans to send around both a video link and a full transcript of her response.

Republicans labeled both Carney and Cutter “tongue-tied.”

Well, I’m sure the Democrats are annoyed. As the story points out, those kinds of stammers are usually removed in ads and such, but not in this case. But, are the email wrong? No.

And both Democrats and Republicans have had their share of political figures whose raw utterances would appear off-kilter on the printed page. Barrels of ink were spilled on George W. Bush’s linguistic lapses.

Interestingly, the MSM has failed to do the same to Obama. His stuttering as he attempts to speak without a teleprompter is legendary. He makes plenty of gaffes. Heck, he makes gaffes when speaking with the teleprompter. Poland is still waiting for an apology over the “Polish death camps” comment.

For months, Democrats have been trying to fend off Republican efforts to hang Solyndra around the president’s ankle as a counter to the Obama team’s Bain attacks.

How sad is it that The Politico changed what is a common place saying simply because Obama is half-black? I think people would have understood there was no racism involved if they had wrote “neck.”

“Um, silly ah, nonsense um … I would think, um, that the RNC can do better … or um, ah maybe they can’t,” said Chris Kofinis, a Democratic strategist who worked for presidential candidates Wes Clark and John Edwards. “It’s not effective. Voters don’t care, and it’s a waste of time. It’s about playing the press and it’s about playing mind games with staff.”

In other words, it’s working.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Politico Annoyed By Republicans Attacking Obama Admin. Stammering »

If All You See…

…is a seashore flooded by climate change, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Gay Patriot.

Read: If All You See… »

Is Mitt Romney A Unicorn?

Perhaps it’s time to give up the Birtherism folks, and focus simply on voting Barack H. Obama out of office. No one can provide proof that Obama was, in fact, born outside of the US and is ineligible to be POTUS as a natural born citizen. Of course, let’s not forget that the Democratic Underground tried this back in February 2008, with the NY Times following suit two weeks later, and then again in July of 2008. And, Birtherism was started by the Hillary Clinton campaign. Interestingly, Lefties have come up with an interesting way to compete against this

(Washington Post) The time has come for Mitt Romney to prove it once and for all: Is he or is he not a unicorn?

Let me stipulate that I have no proof that Romney is a unicorn, and indeed I want to believe that he is not. But I have not seen proof of this because he has not released the original copy of his long-form birth certificate.

Actually, Mitt did release his BC, Dana Milbank. But, Dana wrote posted this on the 29th, so, we’ll give him a pass. With Obama, it took forever to release his, which is why so many folks were wondering just what in the heck was on it. Perhaps Obama thought he would distract folks on the Right. Alas, we are capable of paying attention to more than one thing.

There are many others who feel as I do — 18,000 people to be precise. I first began to consider the possibility that Romney might be a unicorn when I heard that LeftAction, an online petition operation created by Democratic PR guy John Hlinko, was campaigning to get the Arizona secretary of state to certify that the presumptive Republican nominee is not a mythical beast before allowing his name to be on the presidential ballot.

“There has never been a conclusive DNA test proving that Mitt Romney is not a unicorn,” the group wrote last week. “And if Mitt Romney is or may be a unicorn, he is not Constitutionally qualified to be president.”

The mittromneyisaunicorn­.com campaign came about because Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett, citing allegations that the birth certificate President Obama released is a fraud, threatened to take the incumbent off the ballot.

Cute. And funny. As for Romney, he needs to either to Donald Trump to STFU or GTFO when it comes to Birtherism. The Donald is not helping. Of course, let’s not forget that a good chunk of Obama’s base are 9/11 Truthers, a far more serious and deranged conspiracy theory, one which blames Bush, the US government, and sometimes the Israeli’s for killing 3,000 of our friends, neighbors, and loved ones.

So, please, Birthers, stop it. It was fun to “just wonder” why Obama wouldn’t release the BC (versus the Certificate of Live Birth), much like the media was always “just wondering” about Republicans (such as when they were “just wondering” whether John McCain had an affair). The time has ended. Move on. If you don’t have rock solid proof, you won’t find it. He was born in Hawaii to an American born mother. That’s all that is needed to be considered a natural born citizen. Find something else to focus on, like why Obama is turning America into the same type of Marxist state as we see in Greece.

BTW, what do these people have against unicorns? As long as the unicorn is natural born and of at least 35 years of age, the unicorn would be eligible. Nothing in the Constitution says the president can’t be a unicorn.

Read: Is Mitt Romney A Unicorn? »

Poland Incensed Over Obama “Polish Death Camps” Remark, Still Waiting On Apology

Here’s the Smartest President Ever® insulting yet another ally. Does the Democrat White House even bother to do any research? It’s really easy with this wonderful new invention call the Internet

(ABC News) Poles and Polish-Americans expressed outrage today at President Obama’s reference earlier to “a Polish death camp” — as opposed to a Nazi death camp in German-occupied Poland.

“The White House will apologize for this outrageous error,” Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski tweeted. Sikorski said that Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk “will make a statement in the morning. It’s a pity that this important ceremony was upstaged by ignorance and incompetence.”

The president had been trying to honor a famous Pole, awarding a Presidential Medal of Freedom to Jan Karski, a resistance fighter who sneaked behind enemy lines to bear witness to the atrocities being committed against Jews. President Obama referred to him being smuggled “into the Warsaw ghetto and a Polish death camp to see for himself.”

Sikorski also tonight tweeted a link to an Economist story noting that “few things annoy Poles more than being blamed for the crimes committed by the Nazi occupiers of their homeland. For many years, Polish media, diplomats and politicians have tried to persuade outsiders to stop using the phrase ‘Polish death camps’ as a shorthand description of Auschwitz and other exemplars of Nazi brutality and mass murder. Unfortunately this seems to have escaped BaracK Obama’s staff seem not to have noticed this.”

Instead of just saying “sorry, we should not have put it that way”, the Smartest Administration Ever! decided to equivocate

(CBS News) National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor said: “The president misspoke. He was referring to Nazi death camps in Poland. We regret this misstatement, which should not detract from the clear intention to honor Mr. Karski and those brave citizens who stood on the side of human dignity in the face of tyranny.”

Anxious to quell the controversy, the White House also noted that the president had visited the Warsaw Ghetto Memorial while in Poland and that he has repeatedly discussed the bravery of Poles during World War II.

How about just saying “whoops, we goofed, and we apologize”? Would that be so difficult? Instead, Obama can’t even admit he was wrong, and instead attempts to say “but, hey, I’ve spoken nicely about Poles once or twice.” And let’s not forget he hit Poland with his extra-large (made in Canada) bus over missile shield defense before.

Yes, we all know what Obama meant, but, words have meaning, and it is sometimes not what you say, but how you say it.

Buzzfeed features lots of leading Polish politicians expressing outrage, including

Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski, a longtime pro-American voice, tweeted: “The White House will apologize for this outrageous error. [Prime Minister Donald] Tusk will make a statement in the morning. It’s a pity that this important ceremony was upstaged by ignorance and incompetence.”

We’re used to it, FM Sikorski. We’re sorry you had to be pulled into our world.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Poland Incensed Over Obama “Polish Death Camps” Remark, Still Waiting On Apology »

Today’s Hyperventilating AGW Story: “Climate change ‘will cause civilisation to collapse'”

We’re dooooooooomed. Or something

(Independent) An effort on the scale of the Apollo mission that sent men to the Moon is needed if humanity is to have a fighting chance of surviving the ravages of climate change. The stakes are high, as, without sustainable growth, “billions of people will be condemned to poverty and much of civilisation will collapse”.

There is simply too much unfettered alarmism to cover without making this post massive. You’ve got to read the whole thing for a good chuckle. So, let’s jump to the end

Jerome Glenn, director of the Millennium Project and one of the report’s authors, said: “There are answers to our global challenges, but decisions are still not being made on the scale necessary to address them. Three great transitions would help both the world economy and its natural environment – to shift as much as possible from freshwater agriculture to saltwater agriculture; produce healthier meat without the need to grow animals; and replace gasoline cars with electric cars.”

Meatless meat? Gross. As for electric cars, where does all the electricity come from? Furthermore, Warmists are welcome to live their lives without meat and fossil fuels. Show us the way. What’s that, Mr./Ms. Warmist? That would be inconvenient? Hump.

Read: Today’s Hyperventilating AGW Story: “Climate change ‘will cause civilisation to collapse'” »

Pirate's Cove